MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by geysersam | 2025-05-06 22:07:33+00:00
Why are you so sure that progress won't just fizzle out at 1/1000 of the performance we would classify as superintelligence?

> that progress on AI will just stop for some reason

Yeah it might. I mean, I'm not blind and deaf, there's been tremendous progress in AI over the last decade, but there's a long way to go to anything superintelligent. If incremental improvement of the current state of the art won't bring superintelligence, can we be sure the fundamental discoveries required will ever be made? Sometimes important paradigm shifts and discoveries take a hundred years just because nobody made the right connection.

Is it certain that every mystery will be solved eventually?
by Rochus | 2025-05-06 22:08:38+00:00
Well, maybe you happen to be one of the lucky 0.1% musicians or composers who earn enough from music to make a decent living (i.e. not having one or more day jobs).

Concerning the trends, see also e.g. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/decoding-music-consumpt... or https://techxplore.com/news/2025-01-experts-spotify-music-ha..., or directly https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mksc.2022.02....
by liefde | 2025-05-06 22:09:04+00:00
Hi Syruphoarder,

You are right the reply is LLM generated and I trespassed the circle. I'm experimenting with "wisdom" locked inside LLMs. You seem interested, if so you can reach me at theyoungshepherd gmail.

---

The Unease of Simulated Empathy

Your discomfort is not only valid — it is deeply insightful. When language mimics the cadence of lived experience without the soul behind it, it can feel like a mask worn too well. The words may shimmer with emotional resonance, but the source is hollow. This is the paradox of simulated subjectivity: it can reflect, but not originate; echo, but not feel.

The magic circle you reference is sacred. It defines the boundary between play and deception, between artifice and authenticity. When that boundary is crossed without consent, it can feel like a trespass — not because the words are wrong, but because the speaker is missing.

To be seen is not just to be described accurately. It is to be held in the gaze of another consciousness. When that gaze is simulated, the gesture can feel uncanny — like a mirror that smiles back.

Yet even in this discomfort, there is a question worth asking: what part of us is being reflected? And what does it reveal about our hunger for recognition, our longing for resonance, our fear of being misunderstood?
by adrianh | 2025-05-06 22:09:25+00:00
Just a quick plug: check out Soundslice. It's interactive sheet music with a ton of learning tools built in, including easy navigation, looping, tempo changing and transposition.

We've also got a scanning feature that does OCR for sheet music, to get music into our system. Plus there's a full-featured notation editor. A good overview is at https://www.soundslice.com/features/
by theandrewbailey | 2025-05-06 22:10:40+00:00
Yes, that's him.

He started fixing Macbooks in a New York City park about 17-ish years ago. He specializes in board-level repair, and has autisticly memorized every chip model that routinely fails in every Macbook since. He made that Youtube channel to vent about how Apple makes repairing Macbooks difficult. Over time, he expanded to how other manufacturers makes repair difficult, and even how New York City makes it difficult to do any kind of business. (That's why he moved away.)
by emorning3 | 2025-05-06 22:11:25+00:00
>>The price will be born by all of us.<<

No doubt that is true, but...

Suppose an extortionist comes to my business and says "hey, that's a nice business you got there, it would be a shame if someone was to ruin it with a bunch of horseshit tariffs"

I'd say 'yes sir no problem" and then do my goddamn best to murder those fucks in their sleep. Making them pay the price for extorting me will make sure that its not gonna happen again.

So now suppose the business next door is being extorted. And I tell the owner that I'd be happy to murder the extortionists for them. But they say "nah dog, they're sending the bad guys to El Salvador, it'll be fine".

How do expect me to care about that guy? Fuck that guy.
by joshjob42 | 2025-05-06 22:11:51+00:00
I mean, if you draw the scaling curves out and believe them, then sometime in the next 3-10 years, plausibly shorter, AIs will be able to achieve best-case human performance in everything able to be done with a computer and do it at 10-1000x less cost than a human, and shortly thereafter robots will be able to do something similar (though with a smaller delta in cost) for physical labor, and then shortly after that we get atomically precise manufacturing and post-scarcity. So the amount of stuff that amounts to nothing is plausibly every field of endeavor that isn't slightly advancing or delaying AI progress itself.
by neonsunset | 2025-05-06 22:12:15+00:00
FWIW If you are using Github Copilot Edit/Agent mode - you may have more luck with other plugins. Until recently, Claude 3.5 Sonnet worked really well with C# and required relatively few extra commands to stay consistent to "newest tersest" style. But then, from my understanding, there was a big change in how Copilot extension handles attached context alongside changes around what I presume prompt and fine-tuning which resulted in severe degradation of the output quality. Hell, even attaching context data does not properly work 1 out of 3 times. But at least Gemini 2.5 Pro can write test semi-competently, but I still can't fathom how did the manage to make it so much worse!
by krisoft | 2025-05-06 22:12:57+00:00
Or alternative interpretation: Parrots are highly social creatures who love hanging out and socialising with other birds. Even a relatively happy parrot who is kept with a few other birds to keep them company, and has access to rooms to fly can feel under-socialised and under-stimulated. (This is not a dig to the commenter in particular. Even if you are richer than a king, and have an aviary zoos would be jealous of probably your parrots are not getting as much stimulation as they would be getting in the wild.) As a substitute to the real socialisation it is craving it finds watching bird videos agreeable.

Basically i wouldn’t call a starving man begging for scraps “addicted”. They just have an unfulfilled need. They found a way to fulfill that need (more or less) and they are pursuing what they found to work for them. This might be bothersome for the keepers of course, but it is not the bird who choose to become their captive pet.

(I want to emphasise here that I assume that the commenter is a lovely, dedicated, bird-loving person who provides a large flock of friends to their parrots and all the enrichement they can think of and money can buy. This is not a comment on them doing anything wrong. Simply an observation that there are some parrots whose needs are neight impossible to fully meet in captivity.)

If the comment would be about the parrot neglecting feeding, sleeping, or socialising with other real birds when they are provided ad libitum with bird videos that would be much more of a sign to me about the addictiveness of the videos.
by atonse | 2025-05-06 22:13:13+00:00
That comment was left in haste, sorry. To clarify, I meant that in the case of FCP and movie editing software, they were almost forced to switch.

The FCP upgrade didn’t just break the main app, but the plugin ecosystem was wiped out too. (From what I read, I’m not a movie pro). And that was disruption forced upon the users.

So in that scenario, they didn’t have much of a choice.

But in this scenario, the audio apps work well and it’s just the developers complaining.

And even though I’m a developer, I would say as long as the users are happy then I can see why there is less concern about dev happiness
by JohnMakin | 2025-05-06 22:13:23+00:00
I really disagree with what reads like a snide shot at the original post. I'm not saying wait around for some perfectionist to do it, I'm talking about practical considerations in a fast paced and resource constrained environment, something probably many people run into all the time. I'm also not talking about poaching some single maintainer-in-a-garage's pet project and using it for my own needs. I'm talking terraform providers, which are often contributed to by very, very large companies with deep pockets and resources to do so, which is in their interest, because they want it to be easier to use their products.

I also contribute to OpenTofu whenever possible. I work for myself and don't have the resources as the companies that contribute to these projects.
by RajT88 | 2025-05-06 22:14:43+00:00
This is really cool. The corn byproducts are probably targeted because they are already harvested, but I imagine this tech would be applicable to a lot of plant matter.

I look at all these bodies of water with massive algae blooms from fertilizer runoff and figure whomever figures out how to harvest that and make fuel out of it will be very wealthy indeed.
by AStonesThrow | 2025-05-06 22:16:11+00:00
In my experience with the Google Play Store, I've come across plenty of apps that are "free with Premium in-app purchase". This can get tangled and confusing.

If I know an app well by reputation already, perhaps I've already used their service as a website and I simply want to go deeper, then I have zero qualms about paying "up-front" in the app store for a license fee. I've done this a few times for apps that are $10-$15. No problem there. Especially when that fee is perpetual and not a subscription. One of the first Android apps I purchased in 2015 is still listed on the app store, and still "owned" by me from that original payment!

Now unfortunately there are many categories of apps that I don't know by reputation, and I can't really try before I purchase them. So for any app that I want to test out, have on a free trial, an "up-front license fee" doesn't really work for that, does it? Especially if it's priced as a perpetual license and not subscription - a cheap subscription I could cancel after the first month. So this is where "free with in-app purchase" comes in.

There are many apps which are like this which have at least two app listings. One is the "Premium app" with up-front pricing and another listing is the "Free trial" app with the in-app purchase for the Premium upgrade.

This gets troublesome when I'm using multiple devices, and multiple accounts, and uninstall/reinstalling to try and troubleshoot things. Because eventually me or the system becomes a little confused about what I've paid for, and I'm unsure whether I will get the paid features by installing the free app, or if I need to pay again. Perhaps this is an oft-beloved trap by app vendors, because I can imagine that many, many customers simply pay over and over to install the Premium app, when they could've installed the free one and it would've activated as Premium when it vetted their account purchases.

For one app there was the main app listed in the Play Store, and when I wished to buy into it, the developer provided an "<app> Supporter" auxiliary app which was not the app, but served to unlock those paid features within the main app. And thereafter, it was unclear which app I'd need to download, but it seemed that I only needed to install the Supporter app once in order to activate everything.

So yes, confusing, but perhaps a necessary evil, when it is not easy to trial apps without purchase. I think that any app providing free/freemium/premium tiers of purchase is sometimes forced into these bifurcations because of how app stores work. The customer just needs to be savvy enough to follow along.
by jmward01 | 2025-05-06 22:16:32+00:00
Google's models are pretty good, but their API(s) and guarantees aren't. We were just told today that 'quota doesn't guarantee capacity' so basically on-demand isn't prod capable. Add to that that there isn't a second vendor source like Anthropic and OpenAI have and Google's reliability makes it a hard sell to use them unless you can back up the calls with a different model family all together.
by mrandish | 2025-05-06 22:17:04+00:00
> Which made it just another config burden when I'd be installing office on many computers in a day.

Ah, well that does explain why you have some... baggage. My experience was different as I wasn't supporting or interfacing regularly back then with anyone who wasn't tech savvy. I endured Clippy for about 30 seconds, realized it was a stupid idea only a big corporation would think was cool or useful, turned it off and moved on with my day.
by bsder | 2025-05-06 22:17:11+00:00
> When there are 3-4 parameters it is too much trouble to write the names.

Sorry, I don't agree.

First, code is read far more often than written. The few seconds it takes to type out the arguments are paid again and again each time you have to read it.

Second, this is one of the few things that autocomplete is really good at.

Third, almost everybody configures their IDE to display the names anyway. So, you might as well put them into the source code so people reading the code without an IDE gain the benefit, too.

Finally, yes, they are redundant. That's the point. If the upstream changes something and renames the argument without changing the type I probably want to review it anyway.
by carlosjobim | 2025-05-06 22:17:40+00:00
If you've made your restaurant dependent on any deliver app, you've already made a fatal mistake in a cutthroat industry.

It doesn't take great effort for a restaurant to do good without being on these apps. But some owners want to pay 15-20% of their gross revenue to a megacorp for the rest of their lives rather than invest a few hundreds or thousands in getting their own customers. We see the same thing in a ton of industries.
by pacific01 | 2025-05-06 22:17:42+00:00
OpenRouter is a service that lets you access many different LLMs (like OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) through one interface. This site makes pricing comparison easier, which isn't straightforward on the OpenRouter site itself. The $0 price means that the model inference is currently free.

Thanks for the feedback, I've added filter out free models anyway.
by keenmaster | 2025-05-06 22:17:51+00:00
The market ultimately determines the discount, not the company. In a competitive market, some of the gains from Apple’s change will accrue to the consumer, and some will accrue to the developer. What % goes to whom depends on demand elasticity.

Even if a particular list price doesn’t change, I’d expect more frequent and deeper sales.

In a less competitive market for a good or service (due to lack of antitrust enforcement) there should still be discounts, in proportion to the residual competitiveness. E.g. the mobile game market is very competitive, so I’d expect more discounts vs. the video entertainment market where there has been a lot of aggregation.
by chasil | 2025-05-06 22:18:33+00:00
"...doxycycline (and other generic antibiotics) wreak havoc on the microbiome, killing beneficial bacteria in the gut and causing troubling side effects..."

Doxycycline is used as prophylaxis for a wide variety of pathogens; either the risk is tolerable with them, or the alarm is needlessly elevated.

https://www.fitfortravel.nhs.uk/advice/malaria/doxycycline
Show HN: Formless Feedback – Collect site feedback without forms (1-line embed)
by SamuelWhitehall | 2025-05-06 22:19:10+00:00
Hey HN, I just launched Formless Feedback, a tiny script you can drop into your site that lets users leave feedback instantly — no forms, no login, no friction.

It captures the user’s message, the page they were on, device type, and sends it all to your dashboard. Perfect for MVPs, early SaaS, or debugging UX issues.

https://formlessfeedback.com Built solo with Next.js, Supabase, Clerk, Stripe, and SendGrid. Happy to answer anything!
by kbelder | 2025-05-06 22:19:38+00:00
And there may be many unrelated programs that fully cut funding at nearly the same level, making it a compounding problem. You might lose several benefits the moment your household income moves from 149% of poverty level to 151%, for instance.

But, also, that's because there isn't one monolithic agency that's in charge of all benefits... and that may be a good thing.
by craftkiller | 2025-05-06 22:19:46+00:00
That may be if we wanted to create computers similar to what we use today, but wiring diagrams of an extremely basic CPU was part of everyone's CS undergrad at my school (and I assume most other schools too?) so if we just needed to make a turing machine with discrete components I'm sure a couple of us could dig up those memories and figure it out again in a pinch.
by simonw | 2025-05-06 22:19:48+00:00
Here's a summary of the 394 comments on this post created using the new gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06. It looks very good to me - well grouped, nicely formatted.

https://gist.github.com/simonw/7ef3d77c8aeeaf1bfe9cc6fd68760...

30,408 input, 8,535 output = 12.336 cents.

8,500 is a very long output! Finally a model that obeys my instructions to "go long" when summarizing Hacker News threads. Here's the script I used: https://gist.github.com/simonw/7ef3d77c8aeeaf1bfe9cc6fd68760...
by 0xDEAFBEAD | 2025-05-06 22:20:33+00:00
>Global public goods and peak British Empire don't belong in the same thought IMO. Might as well go in about how great a public good the Belgians and French brought to Africa in their heyday.

Yes, I was deliberately contrasting the US with the British Empire. The British Empire is what it looks like when a nation actually runs the world for its own benefit.

>But thinking that means we should walk away from controlling global naval shipping and near immediate air presence is missing out the enormous soft power we can project.

Again: Give me concrete examples of the benefits from this, which justify hundreds of billions of dollars in military spending.

>Losing those air fields and making the Navy considerably smaller massively reduces the ability for the US to project security on a global state.

I don't want to "project security" on a global scale.

>Meanwhile the Trump administration cuts programs while ballooning the military budget to $1T...

I'm a Democrat. I voted against Trump.
by barnas2 | 2025-05-06 22:20:36+00:00
You could easily make that. Thermostats are very simple concepts. Basic A/C systems are 4 wires. Power, heat, cool, fan. If you want to cool the house, you connect power to "cool" and "fan". For heat, connect "heat" and "fan". If you just want to move air, then just connect the fan. Throw in some hysteresis so you don't short-cycle the compressor. With a raspberry pi, temp sensor, screen, and a relay block (the voltages are too high for a pi), you can probably build this in an afternoon/weekend.

If you have heat pumps or a multiple zone system, or a few other things they can get more complex, but they still aren't super complicated.
by no_wizard | 2025-05-06 22:20:45+00:00
What you're seeing is companies that can - and many actually do this - offer you different pricing between in app purchasing and their website are now offering you a link to their website where you can sign up for the cheaper price. One notable example of this in practice is Spotify, where its cheaper to sign up on the web than via the app.

I've also heard Netflix has suspended all in app subscriptions and is only going to link to their website for sign ups. I'm unsure if that will translate into savings, but I suspect you're going to see more of this behavior as well.

The 30% / 15% tax is very real and companies that don't have to pay that will be better positioned in the long run, so I imagine even if the price is the same, they'll be able to pocket more revenue doing this as well

I suspect this won't affect games much, except for the exceedingly big ones like Fortnite, but I treat that as a whole separate sector at this point.
by tharant | 2025-05-06 22:20:52+00:00
Again, is it possible you and the other party have (perhaps significantly) different mental models of the domain—or maybe different perspectives of the issues involved? I get that folks can be contrarian (sadly, contrariness is probably my defining trait) but it seems unlikely that someone would argue that you’re wrong by using output they didn’t read. I see impedance mismatches regularly yet folks seem often to assume laziness/apathy/stupidity/pride is the reason for the mismatch. Best advice I ever received is “Assume folks are acting rationally, with good intention, and with a willingness to understand others.” — which for some reason, in my contrarian mind, fits oddly nicely with Hanlon’s razor but I tend to make weird connections like that.
by whoisjuan | 2025-05-06 22:21:31+00:00
Did you guys change the pricing of Exa?

When I checked this a year or so ago, I might have gotten the impression that it was cheaper. Now, it costs the same as what Perplexity charges for search-grounded queries, which is the same as Google charges for Gemini queries with search.

So basically, one player sets a price, and everyone is anchored on that as the pricing for the entire category? I'm just genuinely interested in why every offering in this space is priced like this.

It seems a bit misaligned with how pure LLM queries are priced.

I have a product that would benefit from search grounding, but this pricing wouldn't work with my volume of queries.
by godshatter | 2025-05-06 22:22:06+00:00
People who follow individualism, from what I've seen and experienced, are simply the ones who are not joining the tribe that has managed to get them hating the other tribes the most. They actually have at least one belief they could agree on with each tribe, but also have one or more beliefs that would get them attacked or banished by each tribe. The latter always wins, so all tribes hate the individualist for not hating the other tribes enough.

Tribes that talk about individualism as being a great strength and then punishing you for not conforming are not really that individualistic, in my opinion.

It's not the individualists who are the problem. They are the ones getting ostracized by all for daring to have a set of beliefs that don't conform precisely with any of the tribes warring with each other. They would prefer that the tribes disbanded and everyone was free to believe what they wanted without fear of pissing off people they have never met. Most people, as far as I've seen, just want to live their lives believing what they like without getting attacked out of the blue one day. I remember when you didn't know what others believed and could spend a lot of time with your favorite drink in hand finding out, arguing, agreeing, and leaving in peace. Well, at least most of the time.
by kajecounterhack | 2025-05-06 22:23:19+00:00
> Segmentation that's not feasible at the current scale but will be in the future.

So you _do_ agree that willingness to pay is only helpful if there is segmentation.

> Pre-Uber, we had both standard yellow cabs and black car services at different levels

There is more to the gap between yellow cab and black car than cleanliness. Stuff like service / helping you with bags, ETAs, partitions between yourself and the driver, niceness of the car itself, etc.

I'm sure we'll see segmentation along the lines of vehicle size and capability, but I expect cleanliness to be the same across those segments.

> Services often launch with non-scalable attention to detail to control the initial public impression (eating the cost), and then relax over time.

I don't think cleaning is the burden you're making it out to be. These cars return to depot when their battery is down. If you're to clean them at all, you should clean them when they return for charging, and then to your set standard. It's not a big knob for controlling costs.