MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by sunny_90 | 2025-04-04 14:25:11+00:00
2 weeks ago, I started to vibecoded the submit discount coupon app, SaveSmart App, that solved my own desire. Problems: Most of the submit discount coupon apps don't allow you to submit your affiliate link.

Solutions: My app allows anyone to submit their discount coupon codes that attach to their affiliate link so they can help shoppers save while they earn through their affiliate.

Benefits: Discount Coupon submission is a great SEO strategy to promote your products and store. Coupon submission will create more exposure for your online store, services, and products. It is also a fantastic way of getting more niche-specific results from the coupon websites on Google SERPs. Earn through their affiliate.

Background: I am a MERN developer but most of my projects are frontend. The first AI tool that I used was GitHub Copilot. I discovered other AI tools that leverage the process from project setup, UI build, page design, database integration, bug fixed, etc.

AI Tools: Bolt and Windsurf

Tech Stacks: Next.js, TypeScript, Tailwind, and Supabase

I'd love any feedback you have!
by sorcerer-mar | 2025-04-04 14:25:48+00:00
Another angle: he's a very stupid person.

Consider if you were kind of a dumbass but born very wealthy. You go your entire life running from income tax. Then someone mentions tariffs to you. A complete dumbass in this situation would, obviously, be extremely excited about the idea of replacing income tax with tariffs. And fortunately for him/unfortunately for us, it's one of the few things POTUS can basically do unilaterally.

It has side-benefits like centralizing power so everyone has to come to you for exemptions, it makes it look like you have a chance of moving American industry back a few decades which would be great for a chunk of your constituency, etc.

But fundamentally he's just a dumbass and the people around him are fully indoctrinated into his cult. Very dangerous combination.

https://www.axios.com/2025/02/20/commerce-secretary-lutnick-...
by lo_zamoyski | 2025-04-04 14:25:55+00:00
People talk about meaning, but they rarely define it.

Ultimately, "meaning" is a matter of "purpose", and purpose is a matter of having an end, or telos. The end of a thing is dependent on the nature of a thing. Thus, the telos of an oak tree is different from the telos of a squirrel which is different from that of a human being. The telos or end of a thing is a marker of the thing's fulfillment or actualization as the kind of thing it is. A thing's potentiality is structured and ordered toward its end. Actualization of that potential is good, the frustration of actualization is not.

As human beings, what is most essential to us is that we are rational and social animals. This is why we are miserable when we live lives that are contrary to reason, and why we need others to develop as human beings. The human drama, the human condition, is, in fact, our failure to live rationally, living beneath the dignity of a rational agent, and very often with knowledge of and assent to our irrational deeds. That is, in fact, the very definition of sin: to choose to act in a way one knows one should not. Mistakes aren't sins, even if they are per se evil, because to sin is to knowingly do what you should not (though a refusal to recognize a mistake or to pay for a recognized mistake would constitute a sin). This is why premeditated crimes are far worse than crimes of passion; the first entails a greater knowledge of what one is doing, while someone acting out of intemperance, while still intemperate and thus afflicted with vice, was acting out of impulse rather fully conscious intent.

So telos provides the objective ground for the "meaning" of acts. And as you may have noticed, implicitly, it provides the objective basis for morality. To be is synonymous with good, and actualization of potential means to be more fully.
by fifilura | 2025-04-04 14:26:18+00:00
Maybe, but now you are pushing opinions, not facts.

I am pretty sure that you will not see a negative correlation between tax and GDP, just look at that list.

And maybe the politicians and tax officers in Denmark are people that got there because they enjoyed free university education instead of getting it paid by their parents?

Or maybe they were even re-educated factory workers?
by kccqzy | 2025-04-04 14:26:28+00:00
But Monarch is the backend, so people rarely interact with it. As of the time I left Google, the UI is automon, the language to write alert rules in is gmon, the language to do interactive exploration in is mash, and the CLI to interact with retentions and metrics etc is monarch_tool. It didn't matter if the backend was Monarch or not.
by skeeter2020 | 2025-04-04 14:26:39+00:00
I don't agree with or support the overall position of the GP, but feel the parts their argument you attack are not the important parts. The Dems most certainly did sabotage their own campaign. Incredibly weak leaders and they kept telling people who are really hurting and falling farther behind that "everything's great; the last 4 years have improved dramatically!" when it just wasn't the case for the exact same people Trump told he would make everything so much better. He lied, won't help them and doesn't give a shit about the vast majority of citizens, but he told them exactly what they wanted to hear. The Democrats were incredibly tone-deaf, and massively discounted 1. how many people were mad and 2. how many were willing to plug their noses and vote for Trump.
by LurkandComment | 2025-04-04 14:27:02+00:00
1. I've worked with analysts and done analysis for 20+ years. I have used Machine Learning with OSINT as far back as 2008 and use AI with OSINT today. I also work with many related analysts.

2. Most analysts in a formal institution are professionally trained. In Europe, Canada and some parts of the US it's a profession with degree and training requirements. Most analysts have critical thinking skills, for sure the good ones.

3. OSINT is much more accessible because the evidence ISN'T ALWAYS controlled by a legal process so there are a lot of people who CAN be OSINT analysts or call themselves that and are not professionally trained. They are good at getting results from Google and a handful of tools or methods.

4. MY OPINION: The pressure to jump to conclusions in AI whether financially motivated or not comes from perceived notion that with technology everything should be faster and easier. In most cases it is, however, just as technology is increasing so is the amount of data. So you might not be as efficient as those around you expect, especially if they are using expensive tools, so there will be pressure to give into AI's suggestions.

5. MY OPINION: OSINT and analysis is a Tradecraft with a method. OSINT with AI makes things possible that weren't possible before or took way too much time for it to be worth it. Its more like, here are some possible answers where there were none before. Your job is to validate it now and see what assumptions have been made.

6. These assumptions have existed long before AI and OSINT. I seen many cases where we have multiple people look at evidence to make sure no one is jumping to conclusions and to validate the data. MY OPNION: So this lack of critical thinking might also be because there are less people or passes to validate the data.

7. Feel Free to ask me more.
by rsynnott | 2025-04-04 14:27:06+00:00
Even if companies are convinced they need to manufacture stuff locally (ie they believe these tariffs are never going away, whereas in practice you'd expect that, at absolute most, they're gone within four years, likely two, and maybe within weeks), you're talking about years to build up production capacity. China is likely taking the (reasonable) view that US consumers won't put up with years of higher prices.
by regularization | 2025-04-04 14:27:19+00:00
Trump is supported by the people running Silicon Valley (Musk, Thiel, Andreessen - with Tim Cook and Jeff Bezos financing his inaugural), hedge fun titans like Robert Mercer, heartland industrialist like the Uihleins. Plus white, Christian, married families who don't live in large coastal cities support him in the majority.

So I take this in the dialectic sense - that it is not destructive but self-destructive.

Also the opposition's obsession with Russia points to their loss. The average American doesn't give a damn what Putin thinks. Trump is focused on the US (or maybe Canada or Greenland) while the opposition is focused on Russia. Liberal Denocrats disliked Russia when Khrushchev was in charge too, they just have some anti-Russian animus that you can read about in the New York Times back to 1925 and before.
by nunez | 2025-04-04 14:27:23+00:00
We just got an induction range and our long-time nonstick pan did not work with it. I couldn't figure out why the cooktop was turning off a few seconds after turning on until I switched to a cast-iron pan and saw that the cooktop worked as expected.

It worked great once it got going though. I don't think I'm going to miss gas.
by ionwake | 2025-04-04 14:27:28+00:00
Yes that was the whole point of my post.

For further info it was Redbubble.

>Redbubble is a significant player in the online print-on-demand marketplace. In fiscal year 2023, it reported having 5 million customers who purchased 4.8 million different designs from 650,000 artists. The platform attracts substantial web traffic, with approximately 30.42 million visits in February 2025.
by sorcerer-mar | 2025-04-04 14:27:41+00:00
> The democrats have an even lower approval rating and seem to be staunchly refusing to change.

These two statements can't both be true for very long. The Democratic Party is going to reinvent itself. Turbulent and uncertain though it may be, this is how it works.

The GOP just used its generational transformation, has been given free rein to prove their ideas, and lo and behold: they suck!
by Pet_Ant | 2025-04-04 14:27:42+00:00
I didn't mean visual fidelity, I meant the way that plot and theme and art interleave. I first watched My Neighbour Totoro on VHS with no visual fidelity and it was still magic.

You can easily steal the style of a political cartoon or especially XKCD but you cannot steal or generate genuine fresh insight or poignant relevant metaphor for the current moment.
by palata | 2025-04-04 14:27:43+00:00
I feel like the US have a culture of big chains like that. You want an email? GMail. You want mexican food? Chipotle. etc. I don't mean that as a criticism, but there seems to be a cultural thing.

In most parts of the world, you don't almost exclusively chains of restaurants, and people don't expect that. Just like it's normal to have someone suggest a restaurant you have never heard about, it's normal to have someone use an email provider you've never heard about.

Or maybe that's completely unrelated, I don't know :-).
by taeric | 2025-04-04 14:27:47+00:00
I think far too much effort was spent building critical frameworks in social sciences without the lesson sticking that it is a two way street. You build the critical framework to frame specific criticisms. By doing that, you can highlight influences that may be missed in another framing.

Which isn't a bad thing. But the key there is in building frameworks. Instead, we seem to have built large portions of the public into thinking these are the only frameworks that matter. And so everything has to be tied back to them.
by executesorder66 | 2025-04-04 14:27:58+00:00
Yeah, corporations have the resources to do that kind of investment in Linux which random hobbiests don't.

But why do they do it in the first place, instead of investing in their own obviously supiriour massively invested in OS's? Because Linux IS better, and the whole idea of it is better than some closed source crap. By nature of the GPL license it will snowball and everyone else will be left behind.
Show HN: Snack Sports – A TikTok-Style App for Sports Highlights
by phprecovery | 2025-04-04 14:28:17+00:00
Hey HN

We built Snack Sports, a TikTok-Style App—but just for sports highlights. It’s a personalized, vertical video feed of the best plays, buzzer-beaters, dunks, goals, and big moments, updated in real-time without the pressure of social media.

Why we built it: I love sports, but keeping up with everything happening is overwhelming and existing apps are slow and cluttered. I didn’t want to scroll through noisy feeds or scrub through full games. I wanted just the best stuff, in a format that feels fast and fun — like how TikTok reimagined social.

What Snack Sports does: - Watch a vertical feed of real-time highlights - Personalized to your favorite teams, players, and sports - Super fast — swipe through the biggest plays as they happen - Tailored for sports highlights- toggle to switch from portrait to landscape view of a highlight or speed up/slow down the highlight to optimize your viewing experience. - Interact with other sports fans

The goal is to make sports more accessible and snackable — whether you missed the game or just want to relive the top plays in a few seconds.

Right now, we have the rights to men’s and women’s March Madness highlights and we hope to soon expand to the MLB and NFL in the future. Download the app before the Final Four and Championship games this weekend to give it a go!

Our team would love your feedback, thoughts, or ideas for where to take it next!
by floatrock | 2025-04-04 14:28:18+00:00
> how hard can it be to serve those data with HTTP on a web server?

We're talking about TB and TB of scientific data, so pretty hard.

Meanwhile, here's a nice well-organized easily-accessible glorified FTP server of all this: https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-mmz4ve4u5cdui... https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-nexrad/
by mingus88 | 2025-04-04 14:28:24+00:00
There is also the obvious angle to destabilize the world economy to benefit Russia, whose name was not on the tariff board at all.

Yes, the excuse was that sanctions already apply but who would like to place bets on when those are lifted (as a negotiation for Ukraine)

Were it not also the fact that the US just canned the head of the NSA and publicly ceased cyber activities against Russia, it’s hard see this any other way
by PaulDavisThe1st | 2025-04-04 14:28:26+00:00
There are many axes on which to measure homogeneity or diversity.

I don't think you're wrong about the axes for "academic intelligence" or "political outlook". But those are just two of many. Geographic, racial, economic, class (in the European sense), language, culture .. these are all equally valid, and likely to vary more in a university than in a workplace (even in the military).
by darepublic | 2025-04-04 14:28:29+00:00
the thing is, engaging with a poem only as a literal screed on the general topic is a very black and white way to engage with it. The author is negative on LLMs sure, but I'm sure the feeling this piece evokes clicks with many people; including people who use LLMs as power users (like myself). I don't have to fully / always agree with this. It's something that should be said. And there are times when I want to take off my technological wizard hat and put on my simple humanity hat and enjoy a poem like this. And then sigh, double check my impulse to look at my phone, double check my impulse to talk about money making, sex pursuing schemes, look at my friend in the bar and realize they won't be around forever and say, genuinely, 'hows it going bud'
by cryptopian | 2025-04-04 14:28:48+00:00
I've been introspecting lately on why I've got this kind of reaction to the whole situation despite rationally knowing the benefits involved.

We're currently _already_ in the midst of a tech and social revolution in the form of social media platforms. About 15 years ago, everyone became excited about how they could connect with old friends whenever they want on Facebook, from their computer. 10 years later, the story started to curdle as people realised being plugged into the internet 24/7 has major societal drawbacks. I think about how detached I've become from local communities, and just how much my life I entrust to a handful of tech companies in San Francisco.

Now a new group of companies come along, peg themselves to every facet of life, and demand billions of investment dollars for their products and whip up a bunch of evangelists. I'm in the midst of reevaluating my relationship with tech and now tech advocates are in every part of my life trying to tell me how much better my life should be. Maybe I'll install a copilot at some point, but I just want to get on with things for now.

It never helps that my current team has a fetish for rapidly expanding our tech stack without considering the learning cost to the rest of the team, so I'm at my capacity for learning atm
by throw0101c | 2025-04-04 14:29:23+00:00
For more on Loomer, perhaps see:

> The far-right celebrity Laura Loomer was at the White House on Wednesday. If you don’t spend a lot of time online, you probably don’t know who Loomer is, and that’s healthy. To say that she is a “conspiracy theorist” is not quite enough: She has referred to herself as a “proud Islamophobe” and has claimed that 9/11 was an “inside job”; she has charged that some school shootings were staged, accused Florida First Lady Casey DeSantis of “exaggerating” her struggle with breast cancer, and questioned whether the “deep state” might have used an atmospheric-research facility in Alaska to create a snowstorm over Des Moines. (Why? So that foul weather would suppress the turnout in the 2024 Iowa GOP caucuses and hurt Trump’s campaign.)

* https://archive.is/https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/a...
by UncleEntity | 2025-04-04 14:29:30+00:00
Sure, unless they flip-flop on tariffs and make your investment not as attractive as it initially seemed.

People assume there's going to be massive investments into what is essentially an uncertain market. A reversal of the capital outflows of the previous decades or something, dunno?

Why, exactly, would people from other countries chose to invest in the US when they could just keep their investments at home and/or engage with more reliable trading partners like the EU, South America or Asia?
by scop | 2025-04-04 14:29:30+00:00
Singing in adult choirs has been one of my most spiritually and socially rewarding activities. You really feel a brother in arms with your fellow singers. Perhaps it is because singing is such an embarrassing activity in isolation, but then the sheer force of all the voices come together to make something of such power and beauty that you are incapable of replicating yourself. I’ll never forget the tenors I sang Faures Requiem or Beethoven 9th with.
by vladms | 2025-04-04 14:29:44+00:00
Not sure what's your point though. I do think people will always do "some" unreasonable things, but doing all reasonable things at once and as much as we can is probably not smart so we should at least discuss it. How large should a burger be? How many times per day should you wash your car? What temperature should you use for your AC? Don't know, but if someone tells me they eat 1kg burger at each meal, they wash their car 3 times a day and they put the AC to 15 in the summer I would tell them they are not reasonable and that they can enjoy life better if they change a bit their habits.
by freedomben | 2025-04-04 14:29:52+00:00
> I don't think anyone imploring us to change agricultural practices is unaware of these fundamentals about human nature.

I don't disagree necessarily, but to be clear my comment was't directed at a wide audience, but rather directed at GP who did say something that to me would indicate heavily that they are either unaware of or choose not to acknowledge those fundamentals about human nature:

> You wanting the burger has all these negative consequences for humans, animals and nature.

I fully concede that I may be reading it too literally, but I don't think it's unreasonable to take what people say at face value. In fact I think that's the most reasonable thing to do as attempting to read minds over the internet quickly deteriorates conversation into talking past each other and people assuming you're lying/misrepresenting your true intentions (aka, reddit). I don't think I've interpreted their statement uncharitably either, though if I have that was inadvertent and was not my intention.

But also, my main point was more about the path to success than the tediously obvious truism. My main point is that shaming people for their nature isn't generally effective. I've seen this first-hand having grown up in a religious environment that heavily shamed sexual feelings/activity outside of marriage. The path to success (IMHO of course) is to develop palatable alternatives to meat.
by NoImmatureAdHom | 2025-04-04 14:29:54+00:00
My first wonder: is there a good reason for canceling the contracts? Were the contracts reasonable, or was the U.S. gov't getting fucked?

If they were paying reasonable, open-market rates to Amazon and Google, this could be a tragedy.

If they were getting fucked, it could be a reasonable response to sloth and indifference on the part of our civil service.

Has anyone bothered to check, or is this all just wailing and gnashing along party lines?
by palata | 2025-04-04 14:29:55+00:00
And you're in bad faith. The parent I responded to was responding to this:

> Completely agree. Reducing or getting rid of livestock animal agriculture will help with many major challenges we have today, like climate change, loss of biodiversity, animal cruelty, antimicrobial resistance. But hey, gotta have that cheap burger, huh?

They said "I don't care if it's cheap, but I want my burger".

Can you understand where I come from?
by rsynnott | 2025-04-04 14:30:04+00:00
They likely expect Europe and the other big economies to join in. US attacks every country in the world, most of those countries retaliate by attacking the US (at this point, the US, which has a trade war with the world, is in a worse position than everyone else, who only have trade wars with the US), US capitulates, would be the theory. The intent is to make the problem go away, quickly. Of course, the flaw there is that this requires borderline-sane leadership.
by hansvm | 2025-04-04 14:30:12+00:00
One thing I experimented with was writing a tag-based filesystem for that sort of thing. Imagine, e.g., using an entity component system and being able to choose a view that does a refactor across all entities or one that hones in on some cohesive slice of functionality.

In practice, it wound up not quite being worth it (the concept requires the same file to "exist" in multiple locations for that idea to work with all your other tools in a way that actually exploits tags, but then when you reference a given file (e.g., to import it) that needs to be some sort of canonical name in the TFS so that on `cd`-esque operations you can reference the "right" one -- doable, but not agnostic of the file format, which is the point where I saw this causing more problems than it was solving).

I still think there's something there though, especially if the editing environment, programming language, and/or representation of the programming language could be brought on board (e.g., for any concrete language with a good LSP, you can re-write important statements dynamically).
by biophysboy | 2025-04-04 14:30:14+00:00
Obviously this will have enormous economic consequences if the "policy put" has a lower strike than the world needs, but I'm honestly more curious about the long-term political effects of this.

Trump has made the GOP more populist and in response the Dems have become more institutionalist. Long-term tariffs could lock in this trend, with finance and business resigning themselves to settle for the latter political camp. Basically, business would trade vicious efficiency for reliability/predictability, while the dems would trade Bernie bros for the business class.