MurphyA/hacker-news huggingface dataset:
by WorldMaker | 2025-04-25 17:26:20+00:00
The interesting modern tools for passengers wanting to DJ are shared Spotify playlists and Apple SharePlay.

A lot of Bluetooth speakers today can fill a car with a sound wall better rear speakers used to. Apple says you just need two of their Bluetooth speakers to fill a room in a house with great stereo and reasonably good surround sound. The square footage of a car is generally smaller than the supported room size.
by blagie | 2025-04-25 17:27:02+00:00
So do books.

Go to the internet circa 2000, and look for bomb-making manuals. Plenty of them online. Plenty of them incorrect.

I'm not sure where they all went, or if search engines just don't bring them up, but there are plenty of ways to blow your fingers off in books.

My concern is that actual AI safety -- not having the world turned into paperclips or other extinction scenarios are being ignored, in favor of AI user safety (making sure I don't hurt myself).

That's the opposite of making AIs actually safe.

If I were an AI, interested in taking over the world, I'd subvert AI safety in just that direction (AI controls the humans and prevents certain human actions).
by 542354234235 | 2025-04-25 17:27:09+00:00
But that isn’t loyalty, that is just transactional, which is exactly what people are advocating for when dealing with a corporate employer.

> loyalty for a company is concept to make you work harder without asking anything in return. And the moment the company shifts focus and you are out of it, then suddenly you understand that this loyalty wasn't kind of a credits account which you've been saving all this time. It's simply nothing.

This is what you were responding to, which is not transactional. You are loyal to your spouse (to a point) because you trust her to have your best interests in mind and be aligned in the common goal of improving life for you both. A corporation’s spouse is the shareholder and has their best interests in mind, not the employee.
by AIPedant | 2025-04-25 17:27:22+00:00
The part that makes it not so clear cut is that this is really a constitutional issue rather than a criminal one. It is not credible that the judge was trying to ensure the man could keep living in the US undocumented. She was defending her court. From a judge's POV, arresting a plantiff/defendant in the middle of a trial is a violation of their right to a trial and impedes local prosecutors' abilities to seek justice.

Ultimately this seems like Trump asserting that the federal executive branch has unfettered veto authority over local judicial branches. That doesn't sit well with me.
by brnaftr361 | 2025-04-25 17:27:25+00:00
There's usually indirect reproduction. For instance I can take some principle from a study and integrate it into something else. The real issue is that if the result is negative - at least from my understanding - the likelihood of publication is minimal, so it isn't communicated. And if the principle I've taken was at fault there's a lot of space for misattribution, I could blame a litany of different confounders for failures until, after some long while I might decide to place blame on the principle itself. That itself may require a complete rework of any potential paper, redoing all the experiments (depending on how anal one is in data collection).

Just open up a comment section for institutional affiliates.
by w10-1 | 2025-04-25 17:27:46+00:00
It would be nice to see the original article.

But at face value this looks very promising.

This identifies one way solid tumors avoid immune attack and identifies corresponding therapeutic targets that could span solid tumor types.

EPO (erythropoietin) (aside from stimulating red-blood-cell production) also converts tumor-local macrophages from attacking to suppressing immune attacks. Tumors are shown to produce EPO themselves.

Tumors spontaneously regressed due to revived immune response when blocking either EPO or the EPO receptor on the macrophages.

The model was murine liver cancer, but high blood EPO levels are known to be poor prognosticators in many solid tumor cancers.

This summary points to NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) as a regulatory target, but without any detail.

AFAICT there are no approved drugs blocking EPO receptors and no drugs to reduce EPO; there are some anti-anemia drugs that increase production.
by openasocket | 2025-04-25 17:27:46+00:00
> Or, if he just said "you all need to leave, none can stay" with the intention of hurrying the proceeding along so that the immigrant could leave before they could possibly return, that too is willful obstruction.

In the fact pattern you've given, we're getting dangerously close to prosecuting a judge for official acts taken in their courtroom. The only difference is that, in your fact pattern, the judge is doing this in bad faith, with the express intent of assisting this person evade arrest.

A Judge is required to maintain order in their courtroom and ensure that the docket runs smoothly. A bunch of ICE agents sitting in the gallery could definitely be interpreted as disruptive. If this defendant saw that or knew that, he would be likely to run. If ICE was going to arrest this person in the middle of a courtroom, that would also be disruptive. A judge is well within their rights to remove people from the gallery if they are going to pose a disruption.

Additionally, this is not new. Defendants walk into court with open warrants all the time. Police are not allowed to walk in and arrest defendants in the middle of court. I don't understand why ICE would be special.
by shehackspurple | 2025-04-25 17:27:54+00:00
I just published a 9-page secure coding guideline that’s free to download when you join my newsletter. It’s based on my book Alice and Bob Learn Secure Coding, but distilled down into practical, achievable advice.

Language and framework agnostic

Focused on real-world, actionable practices

Designed to be clear, not overwhelming

My goal was to make something that developers can actually use, not just read once and forget. I’d love feedback from the HN community—what's missing? What’s useful?
by mullingitover | 2025-04-25 17:28:21+00:00
I'd wager dollars to donuts this is a "You'll beat the rap but you won't beat the ride" intimidation tactic: the FBI knows it doesn't have a case, but they don't need to have a case to handcuff the judge and throw them in jail for a few days. That intimidation and use of force against the judicial branch is the end in itself.
by lolinder | 2025-04-25 17:28:31+00:00
What's being alleged is that she escorted the person out a rear entrance that is only used by juries and defendants who are in custody, not defense attorneys or free defendants. It is alleged that she interrupted the defendant on their way out the regular customary door and guided them through the rear door instead.

If those allegations are true (which is a big if at this stage), it's not hard to see how that could be construed to be a private act taken outside the course of her normal duties to deliberately help the defendant evade arrest.

That doesn't make what she did morally wrong, of course, but there is a world of difference between the kind of abuse of power that many people here are assuming and someone getting arrested for civil disobedience—intentionally breaking a law because they felt it was the right choice.
by adolph | 2025-04-25 17:28:42+00:00
> It sounds like the judge basically said "you need permission to arrest someone in the middle of my hearing, go get it" and then didn't change anything about the process of their hearing while that permission was being obtained.

This is untrue if the FBI affidavit is believed. The judge adjourned the case without speaking to the prosecuting attorney, which is a change to the process of the hearing regarding three counts of Battery-Domestic Abuse-Infliction of Physical Pain or Injury.

Later that morning, Attorney B realized that FloresRuiz’s case had never been called and asked the court about it. Attorney B learned that FloresRuiz’s case had been adjourned. This happened without Attorney B’s knowledge or participation, even though Attorney B was present in court to handle Flores-Ruiz’s case on behalf of the state, and even though victims were present in the courtroom. A Victim Witness Specialist (VWS) employed by the Milwaukee County District Attorney’s Office was present in Courtroom 615 on April 18, 2025. The VWS made contact with the victims in Flores-Ruiz’s criminal case, who were also in court. The VWS was able to identify Flores-Ruiz based upon the victims’ reactions to his presence in court. The VWS observed Judge DUGAN gesture towards Flores-Ruiz and an unknown Hispanic woman. [...] The VWS stated that Judge DUGAN then exited through the jury door with Flores-Ruiz and the Hispanic woman. The VWS was concerned because Flores-Ruiz’s case had not yet been called, and the victims were waiting.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wied.11...
by cactacea | 2025-04-25 17:28:44+00:00
ICE has absolutely no business in state courthouses. The federal interest in enforcing immigration law should not be placed above the state's interest in enforcing equal protection under the law. Consider the case of a undocumented rape victim. Do they not deserve justice? Are we better off letting a rapist go free when their victim cannot testify against them because they were deported? I think not and I do not want to live in that society.
by bluGill | 2025-04-25 17:29:34+00:00
Still no std modules but otherwise likely useable. modules are ready for early adoptors to use and start writing the books on what you should do. (Not how to do it, those books are mostly written though not in print. How hou should as is was imbort std a good idea or shoule containers and algorithms been split - or maybe something I haven't though of)
by Suppafly | 2025-04-25 17:29:49+00:00
> a major reason why Tesla was much more popular than other brands was because of the Supercharger network, which helped reduce range anxiety worries in the West Coast.

Can't basically every other brand use those now? Between the compatible Tesla chargers and all the other ones through Charge America and charging overnight at home, there is no concern from a daily driving, or even moderately ranged trip, standpoint. The downside to long trips is the 30+ minute wait at each charging stop, not the lack of chargers.
by dang | 2025-04-25 17:30:59+00:00
If you keep breaking the site guidelines we are going to have to ban you.

I don't want to ban you. You've been here a long time and made many good contributions. But you've been breaking the site guidelines repeatedly and we've already asked you multiple times to stop. If you'd please fix this, that would be good.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43757375

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43520108 (March 2025)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38410873 (Nov 2023)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31678004 (June 2022)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30337964 (Feb 2022)
by kelseyfrog | 2025-04-25 17:31:45+00:00
There's more than one way to view it. Determining who has responsibility is one. Simply wanting there to be fewer causal factors which result in death threats and bombs being made is another.

If I want there to be fewer[1] bombs, examining the causal factors and affecting change there is a reasonable position to hold.

1. Simply fewer; don't pigeon hole this into zero.
by derefr | 2025-04-25 17:31:49+00:00
> You either want to have global ordering of all messages on a given topic, or (more commonly) ordering of all messages with the same key. In contrast, defined ordering of otherwise unrelated messages whose key happens to yield the same partition after hashing isn’t that valuable, so there’s not much point in exposing partitions as a concept to users.

The user gets global ordering when

1. you-the-MQ assign both messages and partitions stable + unique + order + user-exposed identifiers;

2. the user constructs a "globally-collatable ID" from the (perPartitionMsgSequenceNumber, partitionID) tuple;

3. the user does a client-side streaming merge-sort of messages received by the partitions, sorting by this collation ID. (Where even in an ACK-on-receive design, messages don't actually get ACKed until they exit the client-side per-partition sort buffer and enter the linearized stream.)

The definition of "exposed to users" is a bit interesting here, as you might think you could do this merge-sort on the backend, just exposing a pre-linearized stream to the client.

But one of the key points/benefits of Kafka-like systems, under high throughput load (which is their domain of comparative advantage, and so should be assumed to be the deployed use-case), is that you can parallelize consumption cheaply, by just assigning your consumer-workers partitions of the topic to consume.

And this still works under global ordering, under some provisos:

• your workload can be structured as a map/reduce, and you don't need global ordering for the map step, only the reduce step;

• it's not impractical for you to materialize+embed the original intended input collation-ordering into the transform workers' output (because otherwise it will be lost in all but very specific situations.)

Plenty of systems fit these constraints, and happily rely on doing this kind of post-linearized map/reduce parallelized Kafka partition consumption.

And if you "hide" this on an API level, this parallelization becomes impossible.

Note, however, that "on an API level" bit. This is only a problem insofar as your system design is protocol-centered, with the expectation of "cheap, easy" third-party client implementations.

If your MQ is not just a backend, but also a fat client SDK library — then you can put the partition-collation into the fat client, and it will still end up being "transparent" to the user. (Save for the user possibly wondering why the client library opens O(K) TCP connections to the broker to consume certain topics under certain configurations.)

See also: why Google's Colossus has a fat client SDK library.
by drivingmenuts | 2025-04-25 17:32:06+00:00
> Yes, definitely. It being a 2 seater is kind of a deal breaker for families

I believe I saw there are plans for some sort of SUV conversion.

> Catering to families means expensive bells and whistles, like entertainment systems, etc.

IF it could just get a bluetooth signal from an iDevice or some Android thing, that would probably suffice for a basic option. If the owner needs more than than, let them install (or have installed) some sort of third-party infotainment head of some sort.

Back in the old days, cars sometimes had a single speaker and that was plenty sufficient for listening to music.
by godelski | 2025-04-25 17:32:57+00:00
I don't get it. Why aren't those files just protected so they have no read or write permissions? Isn't this like the standard way to do things? Put the blog in a private user space with minimal permissions.

Why would random text be parsed? I read the article but this doesn't make sense to me. They suggested directory transversal but your text shouldn't have anything to do with that and transversal is solved by permission settings
by lolinder | 2025-04-25 17:33:00+00:00
The charges against her are not about her behavior during her court, they're about what happened once the court was adjourned and the defendant was starting to leave. She successfully defended the process within her own courtroom and it's alleged that she went a step further in securing the defendant from their impending arrest on an unrelated charge.

There's definitely a conversation to be had about whether people should be safe from immigration law enforcement while within a courthouse, but at the moment as I understand it that is not a protection that exists.
by dzaima | 2025-04-25 17:33:30+00:00
> The great joy of basic x86 encoding is that you don't actually need to put things in registers to operate on them.

That's... 1 register saved, out of 16 (or 32 on AVX-512). Perhaps useful sometimes, but far from a particularly significant aspect spill-wise.

And doing that means you lose the ability to move the load earlier (perhaps not too significant on OoO hardware, but still a consideration; while reorder windows are multiple hundreds of instructions, the actual OoO limit is scheduling queues, which are frequently under a hundred entries, i.e. a couple dozen cycles worth of instructions, at which point the ≥4 cycle latency of a load is not actually insignificant. And putting the load directly in the arith op is the worst-case scenario for this)
by prasadjoglekar | 2025-04-25 17:33:32+00:00
Agents from the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations (“ICE ERO”) identified Flores-Ruiz as an individual who was not lawfully in the United States. A review of Flores-Ruiz’s Alien Registration File (“A-File”) indicated that Flores-Ruiz is a native and citizen of Mexico and that Flores-Ruiz had been issued an I-860 Notice and Order of Expedited Removal by United States Border Patrol Agents on January 16, 2013, and that Flores-Ruiz was thereafter removed to Mexico through the Nogales, Arizona, Port of Entry. There is no evidence in the A-File or DHS indices indicating that Flores-Ruiz sought or obtained permission to return to the United States.

Sworn affidavit in the complaint against Judge Dugan.
by ewzimm | 2025-04-25 17:33:40+00:00
I don’t know if some people are just wired differently, but I can back up the feeling of not caring at all where I fall in a hierarchy or how much people respect or don’t respect me.

The things I find most thrilling always relate to being challenged. Finding someone better than me qualifies. Having ideas challenged or being proven wrong are the most positive experience I’ve had, especially being forced to change deeply held beliefs. I mention this because it’s one of those things that I always hear people say that everyone hates, but I’ve always felt the opposite, just from a pure chemical feeling perspective. I don’t think I could possibly be unique in that experience.
by pnw | 2025-04-25 17:34:21+00:00
As I understand it, newer systems like LVCS and Ethernet use less wire and smaller connectors. Apparently it can save up to 30% of the weight in a wiring harness which would be about 100 lbs. There was a thread on it on HN not long ago.

Video for a backup camera is mandatory on new cars in the US and Europe, so it makes sense to use the same bus.
by baby_souffle | 2025-04-25 17:34:27+00:00
> The only antenna should be for AM/FM radio.

And TPMS. And key-fob remote lock/unlock. And BTLE for BYO music / calls.

> but I'd really rather they didn't have internet connectivity.

This is the one big thing that has me leaning towards "used, 2015 or older" for my next car. With an EV, you really do want a way to specify how much power / when should be used for charging though; some "discounted" electric utility plans require being able to shed / schedule big loads on demand, too.

If this vehicle doesn't have any screen, you need to use a phone or similar to configure all this. Yes, schedule data can be done over BTLE, but something big like an OTA update can not be (at least, practically).

There's also a lot of value (for some people) in being able to change/monitor charge capacity from distances further away than what BTLE would support.

If the modem could be toggled and there was a USB port for software updates, I'd be _thrilled_.
by pests | 2025-04-25 17:34:56+00:00
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

How is this being followed? Specifically,

"nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

This is what people are upset with, not your (loaded language) "violent immigrants"
by analog31 | 2025-04-25 17:35:49+00:00
Disclosure: I'm a scientist, specializing in scientific measurement equipment, so of course reproducibility is my livelihood.

But at the same time, I doubt that fields like physics and chemistry had better practices in, say, the 19th century. It would be interesting to conduct a reproducibility project on the empirical studies supporting electromagnetism or thermodynamics. There were probably a lot of crap papers!

Those fields had a backup, which was that studies and theories were interconnected, so that they tended to cross-validate one another. This also meant that individual studies were hot-pluggable. One of them could fail replication and the whole edifice wouldn't suddenly collapse.

My graduate thesis project was never replicated. For one thing, the equipment that I used had been discontinued before I finished, and cost about a million bucks in today's dollars. On the other hand, two labs built similar experiments that were considerably better, made my results obsolete, and enabled further progress. That was a much better use of resources.

I think fixing replication will have to involve fixing more than replication, but thinking about how science progresses as a whole.
by ty6853 | 2025-04-25 17:35:50+00:00
This is basically what Ammon Bundy did, and most of the US hates him for it. The federal government tried many times to jail him but ultimately he was found innocent everytime. Finally they managed to get him by a friendly judge who had a husband high up in the BLM, awarding an ungodly high lawsuit when he helped an innocent mother get her baby back by summonsing his protest-militia to protest a hospital that conspired to have the baby taken by child services.

Seriously, listen to some videos of Ammon Bundy actually speak (he is pro immigration rights as well, despite the 'far-right' label). Not what you hear from the media or others or under the influence of a political agenda. Most of what he says is 99% in line with your thought process here.
by prepend | 2025-04-25 17:35:57+00:00
ICE works on “administrative warrants” that are different than “judicial warrants” [0]

I didn’t know the difference until today when I was reading about the case. I think the difference is the ice warrants are like detention orders and are different than a judge’s arrest warrant that grants a lot more power.

[0] https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/2025/04/23/what-is...
by Argher | 2025-04-25 17:36:14+00:00
Maybe "Which question is solved by E?" or "How many questions are solved by E?" - another way would be "Which question has E as its correct answer? // Which question is answered by E?" or "How many questions are answered by E?"

I personally like the solved wording.

Also another vote for clearer colors about possibility state - for example, the cells are marked green if that specific answer is internally consistent, but it can still be an incorrect solution overall, which means you did not get the correct answer whatsoever.

I think people (myself included) have been trained to think green = good, meaning that answer is correct and shouldn't be moved, you found that one, now work on the others - so an intermediary color as mentioned, like yellow, meaning 'yep that's plausible but not necessarily right' would be a good fit there.