Linguistic Influences on Mathematical Cognition

situations. Front. Psychol. 2:121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011. 00121 Pixner, S. , Moeller, K. , Hermanova, V. , Nuerk, H. C. , and Kaufmann, L. (2011). Whorf reloaded: language effects on nonverbal number processing in first grade—A trilingual study. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 108, 371–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp. 2010.09. 002 Rinaldi, L. , Di Luca, S. , Henik, A. , and Girelli, L. (2014). Reading direction shifts visuospatial attention: an interactive account of attentional biases. Acta Psychol. 151, 98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy. 2014.05. 018 Ristic, J., Wright, A. , and Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 862–868. doi: 10.3758/BF03194010 Rugani, R. , Kelly, D. M. , Szelest, I. , Regolin, L. , and Vallortigara, G. (2010). Is it only humans that count from left to right? Biol. Lett. 6, 290–292. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009. 0960 www.frontiersin. org March 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 228 | 126 Göbel Vertical counting and reading direction Rugani, R. , Salva, O. R. , and Regolin, L. (2014). Lateralized mechanisms for encoding of object. Behavioral evidence from an animal model: the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Front. Psychol. 5:150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014. 00150 Rugani, R. , Vallortigara, G. , Priftis, K. , and Regolin, L. (2015). Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Science 347, 534–536. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1379 Rugani, R. , Vallortigara, G. , Vallini, B. , and Regolin, L. (2011). Asymmetrical number-space mapping in the avian brain. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 95, 231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm. 2010.11. 012 Sagiv, N. , Simner, J., Collins, J., Butterworth, B. , and Ward, J. (2006). What is the relationship between synaesthesia and visuo-spatial number forms? Cognition 101, 114–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition. 2005.09. 004 Schwarz, W. , and Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Percept. Psychophys. 66, 651–664. doi: 10.3758/BF03194909 Sell, A. J., and Kaschak, M. P. (2012). The comprehension of sentences involving quantity information affects responses on the up–down axis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 708–714. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0263-5 Seron, X. , Pesenti, M. , Noël, M. P., Deloche, G. , and Cornet, J. A. (1992). Images of numbers, or “When 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue. ” Cognition 44, 159–196. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90053-K Shaki, S. , and Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers–a crosslinguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition 108, 590–599. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition. 2008.04. 001 Shaki, S. , and Fischer, M. H. (2012). Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition. J. Exp. Psychol. 38, 804–809. doi: 10.1037/a002756 Shaki, S. , Fischer, M. H. , and Göbel, S. M. (2012). The origin of number-space associations: a comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 112, 275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp. 2011.12. 005 Shaki, S. , Fischer, M. H. , and Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 328–331. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16. 2.328 Siegler, R. S. , and Mu, Y. (2008). Chinese children excel on novel mathematics problems even before elementary school. Psychol. Sci. 19, 759–763. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008. 02153.x Umiltà, C. , Priftis, K. , and Zorzi, M. (2009). The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect. Exp. Brain Res. 192, 561–569. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1623-2 Van Galen, M. S. , and Reitsma, P. (2008). Developing access to number magnitude: a study of the SNARC effect in 7to 9-year-olds. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 101, 99–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp. 2008.05. 001 Wood, G. , Willmes, K. , Nuerk, H. C. , and Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychol. Sci. Q. 50, 489–525. Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: the SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. J. Cogn. Cult. 5, 165–190. doi: 10.1163/15685370540