Analysis of long-term variations in the geomagnetic poloidal field intensity and evaluation of their relationship with global geodynamics

SUMMARY The 1167 published cooling unit (CU) palaeointensity estimates contained in the 400‐10 Ma portion of the PINT global database were rigorously filtered according to accurate age determinations, palaeodirectional reliability, recognition of polarity and the method of palaeointensity acquisition. The remaining 865 estimates (group 1) were further filtered to ensure self-consistency, reducing the data set to 425 estimates (group 2). Group 1 and 2 data were clustered into temporally and/or spatially distinct rock suites (RS) enabling each part of the record to be assessed for potential biasing by overrepresentation of palaeosecular variation (PSV). The record was segmented according to the distribution of the data, rather than using arbitrary time windows, to ensure quasi-consistent behaviour within each segment. Differences between these segments clearly indicate that a significant long-timescale (10 7 and 10 8 yr) variation of the mean geomagnetic poloidal field intensity (GPFI) occurred during the 400‐10 Ma period and hence that changing lowermost mantle conditions affect the capacity of the geodynamo to generate a poloidal field. Both the mean dipole moment and its standard deviation appear to be a function of the range of values each CU may adopt at one particular time. This range is itself controlled by the variation of the maximum limit of dipole moment, while the value of the minimum limit remains relatively constant. Tentative support is provided for the recent suggestion that PSV may have been reduced during the Cretaceous normal superchron (CNS), though more data are needed in the range 120‐60 Ma to confirm this. No conclusive evidence was found to support the suggestion that the GPFI record may be biased towards low or high values by palaeointensity determinations obtained using methods that do not adopt pTRM checks. Indeed, offsets caused by unreliable data in well-represented parts of the record are likely to be random and cancel one another out. When GPFI variation is analysed at a sufficiently high resolution to allow comparisons with the geomagnetic polarity reversal frequency (RF), it is not possible to confirm whether the two parameters are anticorrelated, decoupled or related in some more complex way. However, it is clear that GPFI and RF are definitely not positively correlated as has been previously suggested. The present database documents sharp increases in GPFI around the onset times of the two recognized superchrons, itself implying an anticorrelation. The implications, for geodynamo and mantle modelling, of both an anticorrelation and a decoupling of the geomagnetic parameters are discussed briefly. A generic geodynamic model is proposed to explain the relationship between observed longterm changes in GPFI and global geodynamic processes. The model predicts that changes in GPFI result from a chain of geodynamic processes extending from crust to core, beginning with plate reorganizations at the surface and culminating in increases in the vigour of outer core convection. Supercontinents are transient surface expressions of such geodynamic processes and provide the potential to test the generic model. Four time stages are proposed to describe the major long-term changes in GPFI since the Early Devonian: 400‐350, 350‐250, 250‐175