Self-organized Notch dynamics generate stereotyped sensory organ patterns in Drosophila

Self-organization for sensory brushes Sensory hairs on the back of a fruit fly are lined up in neat rows. The orderliness of this arrangement has encouraged models based on organized specification of the hairs. Corson et al. now show that development is both less precise and more effective than that. They used mathematical modeling to recapitulate genetic effects as the developing epidermis becomes organized into enough rows and single lines of hairs. Their work suggests that the sensory field develops through self-organizing patterning that can adjust to the size of the epidermis. Science, this issue p. eaai7407 Distributed and flexible patterning combines with cell-cell interactions to establish rows of sensory bristles on the fly thorax. INTRODUCTION Spatial patterning in developing multicellular organisms relies on positional cues and cell-cell interactions. Stereotyped sensory organ arrangements in Drosophila are commonly attributed to a prepattern that defines regions of neural competence. Notch-mediated interactions then isolate sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells from among the competent cells. In support of this view, prepattern factors direct the expression of proneural factors in discrete clusters and determine the location of large bristles on the dorsal thorax. However, no such prepattern is known to establish the proneural stripes that give rise to finer-bristle rows. RATIONALE By analogy with reaction-diffusion systems, we wondered whether Notch-mediated cell-cell interactions might organize a pattern of proneural stripes. To explore a possible role for Notch in proneural patterning, we generated fluorescent reporters for the proneural factors Achaete and Scute, the ligand Delta, and the Notch early-response factor E(spl)m3-HLH, which antagonizes proneural activity. We observed expression of these reporters in live and fixed samples throughout early pupal development. In parallel, we developed a mathematical model for Notch-mediated patterning. In this abstract model, the dynamics of a cell is expressed in terms of just two variables, for the state of the cell and the level of signal it receives. The model incorporates a series of plausible assumptions that govern its patterning behavior: Cells, which adopt the SOP fate in the absence of signal and the alternative, epidermal fate under high enough signal, exhibit a bistable response under intermediate signal levels. Inhibitory signaling from a cell varies nonlinearly with cell state and reaches beyond immediate neighbors. RESULTS Before the onset of proneural gene expression, a bimodal gradient of Delta expression drove Notch activity; as a result of cis-inhibition, Notch was activated only in regions of intermediate Delta levels. This defined an inhibitory template for a first series of three proneural stripes. The spatial pattern of Notch activity dynamically changed as these first proneural stripes emerged, forming a negative template for a second group of intercalating stripes. Eventually, each stripe resolved into a row of isolated SOPs through Notch signaling. Thus, Notch mediated both proneural stripe patterning and SOP selection via a self-organized process. Simulations of the model, with a time-dependent inhibitory gradient describing the proneural-independent signaling seen in vivo, recapitulated the sequential emergence and resolution of proneural stripes. In both model and experiments, mutual inhibition drove a gradual refinement of the proneural group, concomitant with the buildup of proneural activity. Cells on the sides of the stripes were excluded first, such that stripes narrowed before isolated SOPs emerged. In terms of the model, cell-intrinsic bistability allowed cells with higher proneural activity, at the center of the stripes, to evade levels of inhibition that were sufficient to exclude cells on the sides. Nonlinear signaling allowed a smooth transition from weak mutual inhibition within an extended proneural group to strong lateral inhibition from emerging SOPs, ensuring that attrition of the proneural group proceeds until only isolated cells remain. Finally, the model correctly predicted the outcome of perturbation experiments affecting the pattern of Notch activity, the level and activity of Delta, and the range of signaling. CONCLUSION Our results show that self-organized Notch signaling can establish stripe and dot patterns on a tissue-wide scale. A transient spatial bias, mediated by an initial gradient of Delta, is transduced by cell-cell interactions to produce a finer pattern of proneural stripes and bristle rows. Input from extrinsic positional cues and self-organization, sometimes considered competing paradigms for fate patterning, combine during bristle development and operate through the same signal. Self-organized Notch dynamics may provide a flexible substrate to generate diverse patterns in response to varying inputs. Self-organized bristle patterning. (Top) Input from a prepattern (green, Delta) and cell-cell interactions [red, Achaete; blue, Senseless; green, E(spl)m3-HLH] combine to establish a regular pattern of bristle rows on the Drosophila thorax. (Bottom) A mathematical model incorporating cell-intrinsic bistability (magenta, SOP; green, epidermis) recapitulates proneural stripe patterning and the singling out of SOPs (red and magenta, cell state; green, signal). The emergence of spatial patterns in developing multicellular organisms relies on positional cues and cell-cell communication. Drosophila sensory organs have informed a paradigm in which these operate in two distinct steps: Prepattern factors drive localized proneural activity, then Notch-mediated lateral inhibition singles out neural precursors. Here we show that self-organization through Notch signaling also establishes the proneural stripes that resolve into rows of sensory bristles on the fly thorax. Patterning, initiated by a gradient of Delta ligand expression, progresses through inhibitory signaling between and within stripes. Thus, Notch signaling can support self-organized tissue patterning as a prepattern is transduced by cell-cell interactions into a refined arrangement of cellular fates.