A systematic review of the effectiveness of secondary prevention lifestyle interventions designed to change lifestyle behaviour following stroke

Executive summary Background Each year, approximately 15 million people worldwide have a stroke; of these, five million die and another five million are chronically disabled. Stroke recurs in approximately 25% of patients during the first five years post‐stroke; recurrence may result in death, increased disability or institutionalisation. Modifiable risk factors for recurrent stroke have been identified, and may be addressed by means of behavioural health promotion interventions. Objectives This systematic review sought to establish the effectiveness of secondary prevention behavioural interventions, which address one or more modifiable lifestyle risk factors for recurrent stroke i.e. tobacco use, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity and excessive alcohol consumption. Inclusion criteria Types of participants The review included studies that had recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) who had had a stroke, minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Types of intervention The review considered studies that evaluated behavioural lifestyle interventions, designed to address the prevention of recurrent stroke. Types of outcomes Primary outcomes were concerned with lifestyle behaviour change i.e. tobacco use, diet, physical activity and alcohol consumption, and with change in physiological measures e.g. blood pressure, total cholesterol, and Body Mass Index. Secondary outcome measures included psychological outcomes, learning outcomes and incidence of stroke recurrence. Types of studies Experimental and non‐experimental quantitative studies were considered. Search strategy In August 2009, we searched All EMB Reviews, AMED, ASSIA, British Nursing Index and Archive, CINAHL, Conference Proceedings Citation Index ‐ Science, ProQuest dissertation and theses, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and bibliographies of retrieved papers. Methodological quality and data extraction Two review authors independently assessed methodological quality using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument, and extracted data using a review‐specific data extraction form. Data analysis Where possible, results from the review papers were pooled in statistical meta‐analysis using bespoke software based on the system used by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Where statistical pooling was not possible, findings are presented in narrative form. Results Three studies, two RCTs and one quasi‐experimental study, involving 581 participants (baseline) were included in the review. Two models of service delivery were reported: shared care and nurse‐led. Interventions were delivered to groups or in one‐to‐one consultations. Meta‐analyses of the pooled lifestyle data favoured the interventions (2p=0.02; Note: here and throughout, 2p represents the two‐tailed probability). In terms of physiological outcomes, the pooled data favoured the interventions (2p=0.05), particularly those aiming to reduce blood pressure and cholesterol levels. The pooled secondary outcomes, including perceived health status and stroke knowledge favoured the interventions (2p<0.00001), however, the test for heterogeneity was also highly significant. Conclusions Stroke secondary prevention lifestyle interventions are effective in terms of affecting positive change in relation to lifestyle behaviours, physiological and secondary outcomes. However, there was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of intervention on incidence of stroke recurrence. Implications for practice Clinicians should implement stroke secondary prevention interventions which address lifestyle behaviours, physiological factors, psychological outcomes and stroke knowledge. Implications for research Further large‐scale, well‐designed trials are needed to determine the factors that impact on the effectiveness of secondary prevention interventions.