Erosion, Himalayan geodynamics, and the geomorphology of metamorphism

Is erosion important to the structural and petrological evolution of mountain belts? The nature of active metamorphic massifs colocated with deep gorges in the syntaxes at each end of the Himalayan range, together with the magnitude of erosional fluxes that occur in these regions, leads us to concur with suggestions that erosion plays an integral role in collisional dynamics. At multiple scales, erosion exerts an influence on a par with such fundamental phenomena as crustal thickening and extensional collapse. Erosion can mediate the development and distribution of both deformation and metamorphic facies, accommodate crustal convergence, and locally instigate high-grade metamorphism and melting. INTRODUCTION Geologists have long recognized the interplay between erosional unloading and passive isostatic response, but the past two decades have seen a new focus on the role of surface processes in active tectonic environments. Erosion's influence on structural evolution has been examined at a variety of spatial scales (e.g., Pavlis et al., 1997; Norris and Cooper, 1997; Hallet and Molnar, 2001). Thermal modeling yielded the fundamental result that variations in the timing and rate of erosion influence the thermal and hence metamorphic evolution of thickened crust (e.g., England and Thompson, 1984). Geodynamical models now link the mechanical and thermal evolution of orogens to lateral variations in erosion rate and magnitude and show how erosion can exert a strong control on particle paths through an orogen and thus on the surface expression of metamorphic facies (Koons, 1990; Beaumont et al., 1992; Willet et al., 1993). To further explore interactions between surface and lithospheric processes during orogeny, three-dimensional geodynamic models have been developed to explain particular patterns of crustal deformation and metamorphic exposures (e.g., Koons, 1994; Royden et al., 1997; see below). The general conclusion is that erosion can be a significant agent in active tectonic systems, particularly at larger spatial scales, and that interpretation of mountain belts past and present requires consideration of erosion (e.g., Hoffman and Grotzinger, 1993). The issue is complex, because, as pointed out by Molnar and England (1990), records of unroofing that have traditionally been viewed as evidence for tectonic activity, such as sedimentation or radiometric cooling ages, could in fact document erosion events driven by climate. Further, it can be argued that tectonics can force a climate response (e.g., Raymo and Ruddiman, 1992), and vice versa. Thus, to get beyond a “chicken and egg” controversy, we need to study specific processes, in specific settings, and look for feedback relationships between erosion and tectonism (e.g., Brozovic, et al., 1997). With their high elevations, great relief, and highly active surface and tectonic processes, the eastern and western syntaxial terminations of the Himalayan chain offer an opportunity to examine questions about the interplay between erosion and tectonics in the context of the India-Asia collision. In this article, we hope to stimulate debate by offering our conclusions and speculations about the role of erosion during collisional orogenesis, from a perspective grounded in the Himalayan syntaxes. In particular, we draw on results obtained from multidisciplinary study of the Nanga Parbat massif in the western syntaxis (Fig. 1), as well as preliminary work that has been done at the Namche Barwa massif in the eastern syntaxis. Erosion, Himalayan Geodynamics, and the Geomorphology of Metamorphism Figure 1. View to south of Nanga Parbat and central Nanga Parbat massif. Indus River in foreground passes base of massif in middle distance, more than 7 km below summit of Nanga Parbat itself.