24 Spoken Word Recognition : The Challenge of Variation

ion" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-28. Hintzman, D. L. & Caulton, D. A (1997). Recognition memory and modality judgments: A comparison of retrieval dynamics. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 1-23. Hintzman, D. L. & Curran, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 228. Jusczyk, P. W. & Luce, P. A. (2002). Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Past and present. Ear and Hearing, 23, 1-40. Kirk, K. 1. , Pisoni, D. B. , & Miyamoto, R. C. (1997). Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1395-405. Ladefoged, P. (2000). A Course in Phonetics (5th edition). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Luce, P. A. & Lyons, E. A. (1998). Specificity of memory representations for spoken words. Memory & Cognition, 26,708-15. Luce, P. A & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36. Luce, P. A. , Goldinger, S. D. , Auer, E. T. , & Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and P ARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 615-25. Luce, P. A. , McLennan, c. , & CharlesLuce, J. (2003). Abstractness and specificity in spoken word recognition: Indexical and allophonic variability in long-term repetition priming. In 608 Paul A. Luce and Canar T. McLennan J. Bowers & C. Marsolek (eds.), Rethinking Implicit Memory (pp. 197-214). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical Access and Representation (pp. 3-24). Cambridge, MA: Bradford. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1-71. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-75. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10,29-63. Martin, C. S. , Mullennix, J. W. , Pisoni, D. B. , & Summers, W. V. (1989). Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(4), 676-84. McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86. McLennan, c. , Luce, P. A. , & CharlesLuce, J. (2003) Representation of lexical form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 52-53. McQueen, J. M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality and word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17,433-43. McQueen, J. M. , Norris, D. , & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 621-38. McQueen, J. M. , Norris, D. , & Cutler, A. (1999). Lexical influence in phonetic decision making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1363-89. Mullennix, J. W. , Pisoni, D. B. , & Martin, e. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-78. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234. Norris, D. , McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1209-28. Norris, D. , McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 299-325. Palmeri, T. L Goldinger, S. D. , & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 309-28. Patterson, D. & Connine, C. M. (2001). Variant frequency in flap production: A corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production. Phonetica, 58, 254-75. Peters, R. W. (1955). The relative intelligibility of single-voice and multiple-voice messages under various conditions of noise. Joint Project Report, 56 (pp. 1-9). US Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Pensacola, Horida. Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Effects of talker variability on speech perception: Implications for current research and theory. In H. Fujisaki (ed.), Proceedings of the 1990 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1399-407). Kobe, Japan, November 18-22. Pisoni, D. B. (1992a). Some comments on invariance, variability, and perceptual normalization in speech perception. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 587-90). Banff, Canada. Pisoni, D. B. (1992b). Talker normalization in speech perception. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaka (eds.), Speech Perceptioll, Productioll, and Lingllistic Structllre (pp. 143-51). Tokyo, Japan: Ohmsha Press. Pisoni, D. B. (1997). Some thoughts on "normalizaton" in speech perception. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (eds.), Tlllker Variability ill Sl'ccch Processing (pp. 9-32). San Diego, CA: Academic