IMPROVED TOOLS FOR MANAGING AGROFORESTRY LANDSCAPES IN NORTHERN THAILAND : PILOT APPLICATION OF SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND NEGOTIATION SUPPORT SYSTEMS

Current landscape mosaic patterns of land cover in Northern Thailand can be seen as resulting from adaptation of traditional agricultural systems over time. During the 1950s, little influence from the lowlands had yet imposed itself on traditional systems in higher elevation zones. Subsequent outside influences, such as markets for new crops associated with both opium crop replacement programs and expansion of lowland agro-industry, led to extensive clearance of forest in mountainous areas. Increasing clearing size changed the land-use patterns from those formerly based on small clearings, substantially impacting forest regeneration and watersheds in general. Land-use constraints imposed by the Royal Thai Government (RTG) on highland areas, such as accompanying national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, and a watershed classification system, combined with political tensions, fears for national security in border areas, and foreign pressure to stop opium production, further influenced agricultural development.In response, a series of crop substitution-oriented projects were implemented during the 1980s, linked with RTG efforts to improve health service, education, infrastructure, and market access in the highlands. Population growth and in-migration further increased land-use pressure, and by the late 1980s projects like CARE Thailand and the Sam Mun Highland Development Project (SMHDP) began developing integrated approaches including participatory land-use planning (PLP) to address the multitude of problems and develop strategies and solutions in partnership with highland communities. These efforts also significantly affected agricultural systems in transition. During the 1990s, concern with environmental issues grew rapidly. Initial concern focused on criticism of dam projects and state management of forest lands, leading to proposals for a community forestry law that would allow local participation in management of forest resources. But growing environmental awareness in lowland and urban populations was also associated with realization of the importance of upper watershed forests in the northern region for future livelihoods. The regular supply of clean water long taken for granted was now becoming an issue of concern. This set the stage for a growing debate and tension between upstream and downstream interests, which has intensified with recent flash-flood and landslide disasters. Meanwhile, governance reform efforts led to a new national constitution and strengthening of local governance institutions. Additional projects initiated by the Royal Family, the RTG and various NGOs to work closely with highland villagers have been responding to challenges presented by these developments. As a result, locally-negotiated land-use planning, combined with new tools ranging from methods for local monitoring of watershed services to GIS and remote sensing technology, are coming together in a promising approach for addressing both local and societal needs. ICRAF Chiang Mai, working together with the Royal Forest Department, Chiang Mai University, the Queen Sirikit Forest Development Project, Care-Thailand, and other ASB-Thailand partners, are conducting research on these issues and processes at their benchmark research site in the Mae Chaem district of Chiang Mai province in northern Thailand. This research targets development and pilot testing of a comprehensive spatial information system to support participatory management of natural resources in upper tributary areas where national conservation concerns seek to constrain local land-use practices. The system consists of four major components: (1) Negotiation and articulation of local land-use plans and agreements that incorporate local needs as well as concerns of downstream communities and national society. (2) Spatial information tools that provide: a basis for formal recognition of local land-use agreements, transparency and accountability in monitoring compliance, and additional information to enhance the capacity of local institutions to manage land use in a manner that can improve local livelihoods while sustaining environmental services. (3) Continuous monitoring and assessment of watershed services by local communities and watershed management networks. (4) Analytical modeling to provide assistance for both local managers and the general public in interpreting information related to natural resource management issues. Field-testing of the overall system includes additional detailed information on land-use history, local land-use patterns, and other factors that will assist in assessing the effectiveness of the system and its various components. Initial pilot implementation of these efforts began in 2001 in four sub-watersheds of Mae Chaem, selected to represent a range of current land-use conditions found in upper tributary watershed areas. This paper reports on progress at these four pilot sites, including evolution of land-use patterns and local response to the tools and approach and discusses plans for further expansion of pilot tests and potential for wider regional application and adaptation. Thomas, David, Horst Weyerhaeuser, Pornwilai Saipathong. 2003. Improved Tools for Managing Agroforestry Landscapes in Northern Thailand: Pilot Application of Spatial Analysis and Negotiation Support Systems. In Landscapes of Diversity: Indigenous Knowledge, Sustainable Livelihoods and Resource Governance in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the III Symposium on MMSEA 25–28 August 2002, Lijiang, P.R. China. Xu Jianchu and Stephen Mikesell, eds. pp. 381–400. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press. David Thomas, Horst Weyerhaeuser, and Pornwilai Saipathon 382