MACKINDER AND THE PROFESSIONALIZATION OF GEOGRAPHY IN GREAT BRITAIN

According to the thesis of professionalization of scientists, during the 19 century a welldefined social group of professional scientists emerged. That article tries out the professionalization thesis through a precise experience, that of Halford John Mackinder (1861-1947), British geographer, often considered founder of the modern discipline in his country. Mackinder's life and career proved to be congruent with the professionalization thesis, and in particular with the scheme devised by G.H. Daniels which divides the process in four moment: preemption, institutionalization, legitimation and autonomy. In fact, H.J. Mackinder contributed to define Geography's content and boundaries (particularly respect to Geology and History), to establish the first geographical Readership and the first geographical Universitary School in England, to find its benefit for the society, and then tried to sustain himself by the profession of Geographer. In the 70s of the last century came into vogue the discourse of professionalization of scientists. According to this interpretation, during the nineteenth century scholars from natural sciences (which, with a neologism of that time, began to be called "scientists" rather than "natural philosophers") came to be a well-defined and professional group, more or less in opposition to the clergy, guardian of the traditional doctrine of not empirical but deductive and religious derivation. This view was later challenged: in particular, some historians have criticized its proponents for an anachronistic use of twentieth-century sociological category of "professional", or excessive schematism. In this paper we do not examine in depth the stages and the nature of this discussion, since there wouldn't otherwise be space to develop what is the theme of this article. Therefore, the assumptions of the discourse on scientific professionalization in the nineteenth century, according to the features and the characteristics described below, are assumed as hypothesis. We will seek to avoid too rigid schemes, but we are well aware, however, that a certain degree of simplification is necessary in any approach that wants to pierce the veil of the natural complexity of the real. The discourse of professionalization will be tested by observation through the prism of a personal life, that of Halford John Mackinder. This is a significant check because Mackinder was one of the most important British geographers of the period at the turn of nineteenth and twentieth centuries. First English reader in geography, he was often referred to as the founding father of modern geography in England (Wooldridge and Linton, 1955, p. 152; Parker, 1982, p. 8; Coones 1987, p. 22-24, Martin and James, 1993, pp. 205-208; Walford, 2001, p. 65) . 1 Among the works that have adopted the perspective of the "professionalization" in describing the development of the British scientific community (the one that is most interesting for the purposes of this article) in the Victorian era, in addition to those contained in the references of this article, can be cited also: Burrow (1966), Cannon (1978), Heyck (1982), MacLeod (1988), Perkin (1989). Criticism to the application of the nineteenth century sociological models of professionalization are contained in: Geison (1978), Alter (1987), Goldstein (1987). A criticism of the lack of attention paid by historians to amateur scientists in the 19 century U.S. is in Kohlstedt (1976b) . Unofficial English version provided by the author of the Italian paper published in: BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA ROMA Serie XIII, vol. VII (2014), pp. 339-358 The scientific and geographical professionalization in the 19 century Well before the publication of Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859), the idea of evolution had already formed an important part of the scientific revolution that took place in previous centuries. There had been a shift from the fixity of thesis deducted by theology to discussion and empirical testing of hypotheses derived inductively from direct observation. From the Copernican revolution spreaded in astronomy an interest in the evolution of stars, galaxies and the universe around. Biology, having abandoned creationism, was going to take care of the evolution of living species. The modern geology began when scholars perceived that continents are not fixed entities but subject to the movement of tectonic plates. The scientific revolution was accompanied by other processes: specialization, and therefore fragmentation of science itself, and its professionalization. Science is divided into various disciplines, various sciences, and polymaths became increasingly rarer because each subject had an increasingly larger corpus of techniques and methods which are difficult to absorb for those who hadn't a long academic preparation behind themselves (Stevenson and Byerly, 2000, p. 11). If the early modern scientists were often amateurs, in the literal meaning of the word, who found elsewhere the means to devote themselves to science and whose interests often touched many disciplines (ibid., p. 8), in the nineteenth century took place the process of professionalization of scientists and of insertion of the new sciences in universities. A tangible sign of that in Britain is the fact that in the mid-nineteenth century the Royal Society reconsidered its admission criteria, reserving it only to persons of recognized scientific stature (ibid., 2000, p. 10). The process was obviously progressive (Kragh, 1998, p. 339; Gross, Harmon, and Reidy, 2002, p. 118): the fact that many scientists were able, for the second half of the nineteenth century, to find employment at universities, museums or scientific societies, did not eliminate the reality, still substantial, of private amateurs that, having their own means, dedicated themselves to science. One prominent example, in Britain, was Charles Darwin (Stevenson and Byerly, 2000, p. 11). Reingold has therefore proposed a classification less rigid than professionals vs. amateurs: in his opinion there could be found "enthusiasts" (amateurial supporters), "practitioners" (i.e. those who lived of science) and "researchers", the latter defined as those who assumed leadership of the scientific community (Rothenberg, 2011, p. 456). Claval (1964) and Capel (1981, pp. 79-82) identified a significant gap between modern geography, roughly post-1870, and the previous one. In particular, the Spanish scholar attributes the 'institutionalization' of geography to several factors, including its instrumentality to European imperialism (ibid., p. 82), but it places particular emphasis on the increase of schooling, which induced a greater request of teachers and geographical texts, and therefore of the specialized agencies that can produce them (ibid., p. 92-93). The spread of geography in the lower levels of education, according to Capel, preceded and stimulated it in the university system (ibid., p. 97): so much so that in England, where the lower education spread more slowly, geography necessitated more time to become established in the university (ibid., p. 147). According to George H. Daniels’ thesis (1967, p. 152), the professionalization process had four phases: preemption; institutionalization; legitimation; achievement of professional autonomy. The first phase, which Daniels calls "preemption", refers to the exclusive possession of knowledge. Science from general became "esoteric" or, if you will, "elitist": a complex knowledge not only far from the common feeling of religious nature, but too specialized for scholars who do not devote themselves exclusively to it (ibid., p. 152). The common man was no longer able to master or even just handle such in-depth and specialized knowledge, which became prerogative of a small elite of "initiated". The old "democratic" knowledge, based on the mere collection of facts, was replaced by a scientific and elitist one trying to 2 According to Woolgar (1988) in 1800s ended the "amateur stage" of science and began the "academic stage", destined to end in 1940 to make room for the “professional stage" (i.e. applied science in industry and in the armed