ISOLATION OF THE LAC REPRESSOR

The realization that the synthesis of proteins is often under the control of repressors', 2 has posed a central question in molecular biology: What is the nature of the controlling substances? The scheme of negative control proposed by Jacob and Monod envisages that certain genes, regulatory genes, make products that can act through the cytoplasm to prevent the functioning of other genes. These other genes are organized into operons with cis-dominant operators, such operators behaving as acceptors for the repressor. Appropriate small molecules act either as inducers, by preventing the repression, or as corepressors, leading to the presence of active repressor. The simplest explicit hypothesis for inducible systems is that the direct product of the control gene is itself the repressor and that this repressor binds to the operator site on a DNA molecule to prevent the transcription of the operon. The inducer would combine with the repressor to produce a molecule which can no longer bind to the operator, and the synthesis of the enzymes made by the operon would begin. However, other models will also fit the data. Repressors could have almost any target that would serve as a block to any of the initiation processes required to make a protein. A molecular understanding of the control process has waited on the isolation of one or more repressors. We have developed an assay for the lactose repressor, the product of the control gene (i gene) of the lactose operon. The assay detects and quantitates this repressor by measuring its binding to an inducer, as seen in this case by equilibrium dialysis against radioactive IPTG (isopropyl-thio-galactoside). In order to seek the lactose repressor, we desired some means that would not depend on the specific models that might be imagined for the actual mechanism of repression. The minimal assumption on which the assay is based is that there should be some interaction between the repressor and the inducer. ,. However, inducing substances added to the cell are often modified before they can trigger induction. Such is the case with lactose which must be split by fl-galactosidase in order to induceI but the thiogalactosides appear to be true gratuitous inducers; no chemical modification has yet been detected associated with their action as inducers. The ability of IPTG to stabilize certain temperature-sensitive i-gene mutants4 argues strongly that the i-gene product interacts directly with this inducer. Furthermore, the existence of a competitive inhibitor of induction, ONPF (o-nitrophenylfucoside), which can also stabilize certain leaky i mutants and which behaves as though it drives the repressor into the form that shuts off the operator, also supports this thesis.5 Design of the Experiment. -In order to detect. the binding of IPTG to the repressor by equilibrium dialysis, one must achieve concentrations of repressor that are comparable to the dissociation constant of the complex. What affinity does the repressor have for the inducer? Half-maximal induction occurs at 2-10-4 M IPTG in a permeaseless strain. This fact alone does not lead directly to an estimate of the equilibrium constant because the enzyme level changes by a factor of 1,000 on