Systematic Review of Dissociation Between Taxonomic and Thematic Semantics Method

and concrete words: Further evidence from the semantic reading errors of deep dyslexic patients. Neurocase, 12, 91–97. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/13554790500507172 Crutch, S. J., Ridha, B. H. , & Warrington, E. K. (2006). The different frameworks underlying abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from a bilingual patient with a semantic refractory access dysphasia. Neurocase, 12, 151–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13554790600598832 Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2010). The differential dependence of abstract and concrete words upon associative and similarity-based information: Complementary semantic interference and facilitation effects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 46–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 02643294.2010. 491359 Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2011). Taxonomic and thematic organisation of proper name conceptual knowledge. Behavioural Neurology, 24, 265–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/563620 Davey, J., Thompson, H. E. , Hallam, G. , Karapanagiotidis, T. , Murphy, C. , De Caso, I. , . Jefferies, E. (2016). Exploring the role of the posterior middle temporal gyrus in semantic cognition: Integration of anterior temporal lobe with executive processes. NeuroImage, 137, 165–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage. 2016.05. 051 Davidoff, J., & Roberson, D. (2004). Preserved thematic and impaired taxonomic categorisation: A case study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 137–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000125 de Zubicaray, G. I. , Hansen, S. , & McMahon, K. L. (2013). Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 131–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028717 de Zubicaray, G. , Johnson, K. , Howard, D. , & McMahon, K. (2014). A perfusion fMRI investigation of thematic and categorical context effects in the spoken production of object names. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 54, 135–149. http://dx . doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex. 2014.01. 018 Duñabeitia, J. A. , Avilés, A. , Afonso, O. , Scheepers, C. , & Carreiras, M. (2009). Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Cognition, 110, 284–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition. 2008.11. 012 Dunham, P., & Dunham, F. (1995). Developmental antecedents of taxonomic and thematic strategies at 3 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 31, 483–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31. 3.483 Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 Estes, Z. , Gibbert, M. , Guest, D. , & Mazursky, D. (2012). A dual-process model of brand extension: Taxonomic feature-based and thematic relation-based similarity independently drive brand extension evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 86–101. http://dx.doi.org/10 . 1016/j.jcps. 2011.11. 002 Estes, Z. , Golonka, S. , & Jones, L. L. (2011). Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 249–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B9780-12-385527-5.00008-5 Fenson, L. , Vella, D. , & Kennedy, M. (1989). Children’s knowledge of thematic and taxonomic relations at two years of age. Child Development, 60, 911–919. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131032 Finocchiaro, C. , Capasso, R. , Cattaneo, L. , Zuanazzi, A. , & Miceli, G. (2015). Thematic role assignment in the posterior parietal cortex: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 77, 223–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.neuropsychologia. 2015.08. 025 Gainotti, G. (2011). The organization and dissolution of semanticconceptual knowledge: Is the “amodal hub” the only plausible model? Brain and Cognition, 75, 299–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc . 2010.12. 001 Geng, J., & Schnur, T. T. (2015). The representation of concrete and abstract concepts: Categorical versus associative relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 22–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037430 T hi s do cu m en t is co py ri gh te d by th e A m er ic an Ps yc ho lo gi ca l A ss oc ia tio n or on e of its al lie d pu bl is he rs . T hi s ar tic le is in te nd ed so le ly fo r th e pe rs on al us e of th e in di vi du al us er an d is no t to be di ss em in at ed br oa dl y. 515 SEMANTIC SYSTEMS