Nutrition and mental health: bidirectional associations and multidimensional measures

If modification of diet could help prevent mental health conditions, or reduce their symptoms, the benefits could be large: mental health disorders are common around the world and their health burden is high and increasing. Brain structure, brain function and neuronal plasticity are all influenced by nutrients, and the immune system and antioxidant defence system too; thus there are various plausible mechanisms through which dietary factors could influence mental health. However, there is more to the link between nutrition and mental health than the role of nutrients in biological mechanisms that may influence mental health. Associations between nutritional factors and mental health are likely to be bidirectional. While nutritional factors may influence mental health, mental health may also influence diet and nutrition. For example, inability or lack of motivation to purchase healthy foods and prepare these, preferential selection of foods that may enhance mood such as sweet foods, changed physical activity levels and possible interactions with psychiatric drugs are all factors that may cause a person’s diet to change with the development of poor mental health. The need for evidence that addresses this bidirectional relationship between nutrition and mental health has been identified by systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the relationship between dietary patterns and depression. As with the study of many disease outcomes, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that dietary patterns may influence a person’s chance of developing poor mental health, particularly depression. Dietary patterns capture correlations between foods or nutrients consumed, characterising the totality of a person’s dietary choices (and thus move beyond the focus on individual nutrients or foods). However, the heterogeneity in findings from these studies is high and their study design often does not make it possible to assess the temporal relationship between diet and depression. The current issue of Public Health Nutrition includes evidence from a study that considers this temporal relationship and acknowledges the possible bidirectional relationship between diet and mental health. Dr Kate Northstone and colleagues used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) to investigate whether dietary patterns of mothers and fathers of young children were associated with depressive symptoms. A food pattern characterised by consumption of processed foods appeared to increase the risk of depressive symptoms in mothers in unadjusted analyses; however, with adjustment for confounders, and after restriction of analyses to the subgroup of women who were free of depression symptoms at baseline, these associations were attenuated. Findings like these illustrate the need for longitudinal data collections that assess diet prior to the development of mental health outcomes and thus for studies that can deal with possible reverse causation due to the bidirectional association between diet and mental health. These findings also illustrate the need for studies that collect data on important confounding factors. Two other papers in this issue of Public Health Nutrition highlight an important different way in which nutrition-related factors may be relevant to mental health. Poor household food security occurs when household members perceive their food to be insufficient in quantity or quality; they may have feelings of anxiety over their access to food and may report reduced food intake. It is not difficult to imagine that food insecurity could lead to poor mental health outcomes; however, evidence that elucidates this relationship is limited. The current issue includes two reports that assess household food insecurity in rural areas of Africa. Dr Seifu Hagos Gebreyesus and colleagues carried out a crosssectional study in the Southern Nations and Nationalities regional state of Ethiopia and included data from more than 3000 mothers with children younger than 5 years of age. Eighty per cent of these women identified their household as being food insecure; questionnaire-assessed prevalence of depression among the mothers was almost 5%. This study indicates a clear dose–response relationship, with the prevalence of depression increasing with increasing levels of food insecurity. A similar cross-sectional study was carried out by Dr Jessica M. Perkins and colleagues in rural villages of south-western Uganda. The findings from their study indicated that the severity of depression symptoms was worse in food-insecure households. Interestingly, the study also showed that this association may vary depending on the characteristics of the household members’ social networks, in particular for men. Both studies indicate very high levels of food insecurity in these rural African regions. Food insecurity is a significant problem in many high-income countries also, and deserves our foremost attention when considering associations between nutrition and mental health. Like nutrition, mental health including depression is a multidimensional entity that can be assessed in many Public Health Nutrition: 21(5), 829–830 doi:10.1017/S1368980017003974