Monitoring of Functional Fitness of Combat Athletes during the Precompetitive Preparation Stage

IntroductionFunctional fitness (FF) of athletes represents the most important constituent of their fitness general structure, along with other components of physical state. The results of our studies (Pryimakov, 1995; Pryimakov, Osipenko, Kolenkov, & Dan'ko, 2004; Pryimakov & Driukov, 2004; Radzievskij, Oleshko, Iashchanin, & Pryimakov, 2002) as well as those of other researchers (Mishchenko, 1990, 1997; Mishchenko, Pavlik, & Sirenko, 1999; Pavlov, & Pavlova, 2011; Wilmore, & Costill, 2005; Dingenen, & Malfait, Vanrenterghem, Verschueren, & Staes, 2014) have demonstrated, that biological monitoring of physical state of wrestlers is only efficient on the basis of complex, systemic and systematic studies at different stages of training process. Such an approach envisages studying interrelations between various components of athlete fitness general structure as well as the mechanisms of their integration in the process of improvement and partial contribution of each component to sports result achievement at different periods of training process (Pryimakov & Driukov, 2004; Kozina, Repko, Ionova, Boychuk, & Korobeinik, 2016; Kozina, Iermakov, Kuzmin, Kudryavtsev, & Galimov, 2016). Substantiation of test selection for evaluation of wrestlers? level of fitness (Lozhechka, 2012; Latyshev, 2013), account for athlete individual features (Latyshev, & Korobeynikov, 2013; Kozina, Jagiello, & Jagiello, 2015; Korobeynikov, Latyshev, Latyshev, Goraschenko, & Korobeynikova, 2016), monitoring of athlete? s heart rate status (Liu, 2015), the level of basic technical preparation (Iermakov, & Boychenko, 2010; Jagiello, Dornowski, & Wolska, 2014), search for optimum variants to improve work capacity and action performance (Chistyakova, 2012; Mehranpou, Silalerdetkul, Hasani, & Witid, 2015; Tropin, & Pashkov, 2015), account for biomechanical regularities of motor action organization ( Adashevskiy Iermakov, & Gritsyuk, 2010; Adashevskiy, Dylewski, & Iermakov, 2011; Muntian, 2013; Vladimir, & Marian, 2015; Wilke, Fleckenstein, Krause, Vogt, & Banzer, 2016) are of tremendous importance in combat sports. In these cases it is recommended to place greater focus on usage of objective metric information (Zaporozhanov, & Boraczynski, 2015), which contributes to enhancement of the quality of control for the indices of athletes' activity, on the whole. Besides, the expediency of improving the control for physical qualities in the line of substantiation of quantitative and qualitative estimation of athlete state under specific conditions of training has been mentioned as well (Zaporozhanov, 2013; Zaporozhanov, & Boraczy? ski 2013). Our previous studies have revealed, that qualification or skill level determines the ratio and associations of morphometric and speed-strength capacities, the level of athletes' special work capacity (Pryimakov, 2013). Not least important is the necessity to substantiate and optimize the ratio of loads of different character and modes of training of athletes (Bliznevsky, Kudryavtsev, Iermakov, & Jagiello, 2016; Iermakov, Arziutov, & Jagiello, 2016). Such approach is the determining factor of the level of development, ratio and association of the indices of athlete fitness physical structure (Pryimakov, 2013, 2014). It contributes to enhanced muscular activity of athletes leading to increased level of sports mastery (Pryimakov, Shegolkov, Jaszczanin, & Pryimakov, 2009; Pryimakov, 2012). The necessity to increase the efficiency of control for sports activity in terms of designing factor models and classifying motor actions has been mentioned in our other studies (Khudolii, Iermakov, & Ananchenko, 2015; Khudolii, Iermakov, & Prusik, 2015). Such approach permits to obtain metric estimates of measuring accuracy: stability, consistency and informativity of control data for current diagnostics and prediction of athletic capabilities of coachees (Zaporozhanov, & Borachinski, 2012). …