Minimartzz/github-issues huggingface dataset:
Index error when data is large
State: open

### Describe the bug

At `save_to_disk` step, the `max_shard_size` by default is `500MB`. However, one row of the dataset might be larger than `500MB` then the saving will throw an index error. Without looking at the source code, the bug is due to wrong calculation of number of shards which i think is 
`total_size / min(max_shard_size, row_size)` which should be `total_size / max(max_shard_size, row_size)`

The fix is setting a larger `max_shard_size`

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. create a dataset with large dense tensors per row
2. set a small `max_shard_size` say 1MB
3. `save_to_disk`

### Expected behavior

```
raise IndexError(f"Index {index} out of range for dataset of size {size}.")

IndexError: Index 10 out of range for dataset of size 10.
```

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.16.0
- Platform: Linux-5.10.201-168.748.amzn2int.x86_64-x86_64-with-glibc2.26
- Python version: 3.10.13
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.20.2
- PyArrow version: 14.0.2
- Pandas version: 2.1.4
- `fsspec` version: 2023.12.2

Comments:
I'm facing this problem while doing my translation of [mteb/stackexchange-clustering](https://huggingface.co/datasets/mteb/stackexchange-clustering). each row has lots of samples (up to 100k samples), because in this dataset, each row represent multiple clusters.
my hack is to setting `max_shard_size` to 20Gb or even larger
```py
final_dataset.push_to_hub(
        output_dataset, 
        private=True,
        max_shard_size="20GB"  # This will ensure appropriate sharding based on data size
    )
```
It will work, but depends on your data size.
add safety checks when using only part of dataset
State: open

Added some checks to prevent errors that arrise when using evaluate.py on only a portion of the squad 2.0 dataset.

Comments:
Hi ! The metrics in `datasets` are deprecated in favor of https://github.com/huggingface/evaluate

You can open a PR here instead: https://huggingface.co/spaces/evaluate-metric/squad_v2/tree/main
Easy way to segment into 30s snippets given an m4a file and a vtt file 
State: closed
Labels: description: New feature or request
name: enhancement

### Feature request

Uploading datasets is straightforward thanks to the ability to push Audio to hub. However, it would be nice if the data (text and audio) could be segmented when being pushed (if not possible already).

### Motivation

It's easy to create a vtt file from an audio file. If there could be auto-segmenting, this would make the creation of datasets much faster.

### Your contribution

I have made a custom script to do this but it's not all that clean - uses librosa and pydub.

Comments:
Hi! Non-generic data processing is out of this library's scope, so it's downstream libraries/users' responsibility to implement such logic.

That's fair. Thanks
Logs are delayed when doing .map when `docker logs`
State: closed

### Describe the bug

When I run my SD training in a Docker image and then listen to logs like `docker logs train -f`, the progress bar is delayed.
It's updating every few percent.
When you have a large dataset that has to be mapped (like 1+ million samples), it's crucial to see the updates in real-time, not every couple hours to make sure nothing got frozen or broken

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. Run any huge dataset processing as a Docker image
2. `docker logs image_name` to it

### Expected behavior

...

### Environment info

...

Comments:
Hi! `tqdm` doesn't work well in non-interactive environments, so there isn't much we can do about this. It's best to [disable it](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/v2.16.1/en/package_reference/utilities#datasets.disable_progress_bars) in such environments and instead use logging to track progress.
The datasets models housed in Dropbox can't support a lot of users downloading them
State: closed

### Describe the bug

I'm using the datasets 


```
from datasets import load_dataset, Audio
dataset = load_dataset("PolyAI/minds14", name="en-US", split="train")
```


And it seems that sometimes when I imagine a lot of users are accessing the same resources, the Dropbox host fails:

`raise ConnectionError(f"Couldn't reach {url} (error {response.status_code})") ConnectionError: Couldn't reach https://www.dropbox.com/s/e2us0hcs3ilr20e/MInDS-14.zip?dl=1 (error 429)`

My question is if we can somehow host these files elsewhere or can you change the limit of simultaneous users accessing those resources or any other solution?

Also, has anyone had this issue before?

Thanks

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1: Create a python script like so:
```

from datasets import load_dataset, Audio
dataset = load_dataset("PolyAI/minds14", name="en-US", split="train")
```

2: Execute this by a certain number of users at the same time

### Expected behavior

I woudl expect that this shouldnt happen unless its a huge amount of users, which it is not the case

### Environment info

This was done in an Ubuntu 22 environment.

Comments:
Hi! Indeed, Dropbox is not a reliable host. I've just merged https://huggingface.co/datasets/PolyAI/minds14/discussions/24 to fix this by hosting the data files inside the repo.
Feature request: Multi-GPU dataset mapping for SDXL training
State: open
Labels: description: New feature or request
name: enhancement

### Feature request

We need to speed up SDXL dataset pre-process. Please make it possible to use multiple GPUs for the [official SDXL trainer](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/examples/text_to_image/train_text_to_image_sdxl.py) :)

### Motivation

Pre-computing 3 million of images takes around 2 days.
Would be nice to be able to be able to do multi-GPU (or even better – multi-GPU + multi-node) vae and embedding precompute...

### Your contribution

I'm not sure i can wrap my head around the multi-GPU mapping...
Plus it's too expensive for me to take x2 A100 and spend a day just figuring out the staff since I don't have a job right now.

Comments:
After `2.16.0` version, there are `PermissionError` when users use shared cache_dir
State: closed

### Describe the bug

- We use shared `cache_dir` using `HF_HOME="{shared_directory}"` 
- After dataset version 2.16.0, datasets uses `filelock` package for file locking #6445 
- But, `filelock` package make `.lock` file with `644` permission
- Dataset is not available to other users except the user who created the lock file via `load_dataset`.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. `pip install datasets==2.16.0`
2. `export HF_HOME="{shared_directory}"`
3. download dataset with `load_dataset`
4. logout and login another user
5. `pip install datasets==2.16.0`
6. `export HF_HOME="{shared_directory}"`
7. download dataset with `load_dataset`
8. `PermissionError` occurs

### Expected behavior

- Users can share `cache_dir` using environment variable `HF_HOME`

### Environment info

- python == 3.9.10
- datasets == 2.16.0
- ubuntu 22.04
- shared_directory has ACL
![image (1)](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/assets/106717516/5ca759db-ad0c-4883-9a97-9c8fccd00d8a)
- users are same group (developers)


Comments:
We'll do a new release of `datasets` in the coming days with a fix !

@lhoestq Thank you very much!
fix os.listdir return name is empty string
State: closed

### Describe the bug

xlistdir return name is empty string 
Overloaded os.listdir

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```python
from datasets.download.streaming_download_manager import xjoin
from datasets.download.streaming_download_manager import xlistdir
config = DownloadConfig(storage_options=options)
manger = StreamingDownloadManager("ILSVRC2012",download_config=config)
input_path = "lakefs://datalab/main/imagenet/ILSVRC2012.zip"

download_files = manger.download_and_extract(input_path)

current_dir = xjoin(download_files,"ILSVRC2012/Images/ILSVRC2012_img_train")
folder_list = xlistdir(current_dir)
```

in xlistdir function

Obj ["name"] ends with "/"

last return ""

### Expected behavior

Obj ["name"] ends with "/" 
return folder name

### Environment info

no

Comments:
losing DatasetInfo in Dataset.map when num_proc > 1
State: open

### Describe the bug

Hello and thanks for developing this package!

When I process a Dataset with the map function using multiple processors some set attributes of the DatasetInfo get lost and are None in the resulting Dataset.    

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```python
from datasets import Dataset, DatasetInfo


def run_map(num_proc):
    dataset = Dataset.from_dict(
        {"col1": [0, 1], "col2": [3, 4]},
        info=DatasetInfo(
            dataset_name="my_dataset",
        ),
    )

    ds = dataset.map(lambda x: x, num_proc=num_proc)
    print(ds.info.dataset_name)


run_map(1)
run_map(2)
```

This puts out:

```bash
Map: 100%|██████████| 2/2 [00:00<00:00, 724.66 examples/s]
my_dataset
Map (num_proc=2): 100%|██████████| 2/2 [00:00<00:00, 18.25 examples/s]
None
```

### Expected behavior

I expect the DatasetInfo to be kept as it was and there should be no difference in the output of running map with num_proc=1 and num_proc=2. 

Expected output:
```bash
Map: 100%|██████████| 2/2 [00:00<00:00, 724.66 examples/s]
my_dataset
Map (num_proc=2): 100%|██████████| 2/2 [00:00<00:00, 18.25 examples/s]
my_dataset
```

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.16.1
- Platform: Linux-5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2-x86_64-with-glibc2.17
- Python version: 3.8.18
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.20.2
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 2.0.3
- `fsspec` version: 2023.9.2

Comments:
Hi ! This issue comes from the fact that `map()` with `num_proc>1` shards the dataset in multiple chunks to be processed (one per process) and merges them. The DatasetInfos of each chunk are then merged together, but for some fields like `dataset_name` it's not been implemented and default to None.

The DatasetInfo merge is defined here, in case you'd like to contribute an improvement: 

https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/d2e0034122a788015c0834a72e6c6279e7ecbac5/src/datasets/info.py#L269-L270

#self-assign
dataset cache only stores one config of the dataset in parquet dir, and uses that for all other configs resulting in showing same data in all configs.
State: closed

### Describe the bug

ds = load_dataset("ai2_arc", "ARC-Easy"), i have tried to force redownload, delete cache and changing the cache dir.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

dataset = []
dataset_name = "ai2_arc"
possible_configs = [
    'ARC-Challenge',
    'ARC-Easy'
    ]
for config in possible_configs:
    dataset_slice = load_dataset(dataset_name, config,ignore_verifications=True,cache_dir='ai2_arc_files')
    dataset.append(dataset_slice)

### Expected behavior

all configs should get saved in cache with their respective names.

### Environment info

ai2_arc

Comments:
Unable to load `eli5` dataset with streaming
State: closed

### Describe the bug

Unable to load `eli5` dataset with streaming.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

This fails with FileNotFoundError: https://files.pushshift.io/reddit/submissions 
```
from datasets import load_dataset
load_dataset("eli5", streaming=True)
```

This works correctly.
```
from datasets import load_dataset
load_dataset("eli5")
```

### Expected behavior

- Loading `eli5` dataset should not raise an error under the streaming mode.
- Or at the very least, show a warning that streaming mode is not supported with `eli5` dataset.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.16.1
- Platform: Linux-6.2.0-39-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35
- Python version: 3.10.12
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.19.4
- PyArrow version: 12.0.1
- Pandas version: 2.0.3
- `fsspec` version: 2023.6.0


Comments:
Hi @haok1402, I have created an issue in the Discussion tab of the corresponding dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/eli5/discussions/7
Let's continue the discussion there!
document page 404 not found after redirection
State: closed

### Describe the bug

The redirected page encountered 404 not found.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. In this tutorial: https://huggingface.co/learn/nlp-course/chapter5/4?fw=pt 
original md: https://github.com/huggingface/course/blob/2c733c2246b8b7e0e6f19a9e5d15bb12df43b2a3/chapters/en/chapter5/4.mdx#L49

```
By default, 🤗 Datasets will decompress the files needed to load a dataset. If you want to preserve hard drive space, you can pass `DownloadConfig(delete_extracted=True)` to the `download_config` argument of `load_dataset()`. See the [documentation](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/package_reference/builder_classes.html?#datasets.utils.DownloadConfig) for more details.
```
The documentation points to `https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/package_reference/builder_classes.html?#datasets.utils.DownloadConfig`

it shows `The documentation page PACKAGE_REFERENCE/BUILDER_CLASSES.HTML doesn’t exist in v2.16.1, but exists on the main version. Click [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/package_reference/builder_classes.html) to redirect to the main version of the documentation.`

But the redirected website `https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/package_reference/builder_classes.html` is 404 not found.

### Expected behavior

I Guess the redirected webisite should be 
`https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/package_reference/builder_classes`    (without `.html`)
or `https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/package_reference/builder_classes#datasets.DownloadConfig`.

### Environment info

Datasets main

Comments:
Thanks for reporting! I've opened a PR with a fix.
Adding option for multipart achive download
State: closed

Right now we can only download multiple separate archives or a single file archive, but not multipart archives, such as those produced by `tar --multi-volume`. This PR allows for downloading and extraction of archives split into multiple parts.

With the new `multi_part` field of the `DownloadConfig` set, the downloader will first retrieve all the files and attempt to concatenate them before starting extraction. This will obviously fail if files retrieved are actually multiple separate archives, so the option is set to `False` by default.

Tests and docs incoming. 

Comments:
On closer examination, this appears to be unnecessary.
Make DatasetDict.column_names return a list instead of dict
State: open
Labels: description: New feature or request
name: enhancement

Currently, `DatasetDict.column_names` returns a dict, with each split name as keys and the corresponding list of column names as values.

However, by construction, all splits have the same column names.

I think it makes more sense to return a single list with the column names, which is the same for all the split keys.

Comments:
Hi @albertvillanova, can I work on this issue?
No online docs for 2.16 release
State: closed
Labels: description: Something isn't working
name: bug

description: Improvements or additions to documentation
name: documentation

We do not have the online docs for the latest minor release 2.16 (2.16.0 nor 2.16.1).

In the online docs, the latest version appearing is 2.15.0: https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/index

![Screenshot from 2024-01-09 08-43-08](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/assets/8515462/83613222-867f-41f4-8833-7a4a76582f44)


Comments:
Though the `build / build_main_documentation` CI job ran for 2.16.0: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/actions/runs/7300836845/job/19896275099 🤔 

Yes, I saw it. Maybe @mishig25 can give us some hint...

fixed https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/v2.16.0/en/index

Still missing 2.16.1.

> Still missing 2.16.1.

re-running the doc-buld job for the missing ones should fix



Re-running the job for the 2.16.1 release: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/actions/runs/7365231552/job/20310278583

Fixed for 2.16.1: https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/v2.16.1/en/index
keep_in_memory=True does not seem to work
State: open

UPD: [Fixed](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/6568#issuecomment-1880817794) . But a new issue came up :(

Comments:
Seems like I just used the old code which did not have `keep_in_memory=True` argument, sorry.

Although i encountered a different problem – at 97% my python process just hung for around 11 minutes with no logs (when running dataset.map without `keep_in_memory=True` over around 3 million of dataset samples)...

Can you open a new issue and provide a bit more details ? What kind of map operations did you run ?

Hey. I will try to find some free time to describe it.

(can't do it now, cause i need to reproduce it myself to be sure about everything, which requires spinning a new Azuree VM, copying a huge dataset to drive from network disk for a long time etc...)

@lhoestq loading dataset like this does not spawn 50 python processes:

```
datasets.load_dataset("/preprocessed_2256k/train", num_proc=50)
```

I have 64 vCPU so i hoped it could speed up the dataset loading...

My dataset onlly has images and metadata.csv with text column alongside image file path column

now noticed
```
'Setting num_proc from 50 back to 1 for the train split to disable multiprocessing as it only contains one shard
```

Any way to work around this?

@lhoestq thanks, [this helped](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/9d6d16117a30ba345b0236407975f701c5b288d4/src/datasets/arrow_dataset.py#L1053)
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'to'
State: closed

### Describe the bug

```
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AttributeError                            Traceback (most recent call last)
[<ipython-input-6-80c6086794e8>](https://localhost:8080/#) in <cell line: 10>()
      8 		  report_to="wandb")
      9 
---> 10 trainer = Trainer(
     11     model=model,
     12     args=training_args,

1 frames
[/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/transformers/trainer.py](https://localhost:8080/#) in _move_model_to_device(self, model, device)
    688 
    689     def _move_model_to_device(self, model, device):
--> 690         model = model.to(device)
    691         # Moving a model to an XLA device disconnects the tied weights, so we have to retie them.
    692         if self.args.parallel_mode == ParallelMode.TPU and hasattr(model, "tie_weights"):

AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'to'
```

### Steps to reproduce the bug

here is the notebook:
```
https://colab.research.google.com/drive/10JDBNsLlYrQdnI2FWfDK3F5M8wvVUDXG?usp=sharing

```


### Expected behavior

run the Training 

### Environment info

Colab Notebook , T4 

Comments:
I think you are reporting an issue with the `transformers` library. Note this is the repository of the `datasets` library. I recommend that you open an issue in their repository: https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/issues

EDIT: I have not the rights to transfer the issue
~~I am transferring your issue to their repository.~~

Thanks, I hope someone from transformers library addresses this issue.

On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 15:29 Albert Villanova del Moral <
***@***.***> wrote:

> I think you are reporting an issue with the transformers library. Note
> this is the repository of the datasets library. I am transferring your
> issue to their repository.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/6567#issuecomment-1880688586>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE4LJNOYMD6WJMXFKPMH6DLYNO7PJAVCNFSM6AAAAABBQ63HWOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOBQGY4DQNJYGY>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>


@andysingal, I recommend that you open an issue in their repository: https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/issues
I don't have the rights to transfer this issue to their repo.
`Dataset.filter` missing `with_rank` parameter
State: closed

### Describe the bug

The issue shall be open: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/6435

When i try to pass `with_rank` to `Dataset.filter()`, i get this:

`Dataset.filter() got an unexpected keyword argument 'with_rank'`

### Steps to reproduce the bug

Run notebook:

https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1WUNKph8BdP0on5ve3gQnh_PE0cFLQqTn?usp=sharing

### Expected behavior

Should work?

### Environment info

NVIDIA RTX 4090

Comments:
Thanks for reporting! I've opened a PR with a fix

@mariosasko thank you very much :)
datasets.DownloadMode.FORCE_REDOWNLOAD use cache to download dataset features with load_dataset function
State: open

### Describe the bug

I have updated my dataset by adding a new feature, and push it to the hub. When I want to download it on my machine which contain the old version by using `datasets.load_dataset("your_dataset_name", download_mode=datasets.DownloadMode.FORCE_REDOWNLOAD)` I get an error (paste bellow).

Seems that the load_dataset function still use the old features schema instead of downloading everything new from the HUB.

I find a way to go around this issue by manually deleting the old dataset cache. But from my understanding of `datasets.DownloadMode.FORCE_REDOWNLOAD` option, the dataset cache should be ignored.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. Download your dataset in your machine using `datasets.load_dataset`
2. Create a new feature in your dataset and push it to the hub
3. On the same machine redownload your dataset using `datasets.load_dataset("your_dataset_name", download_mode=datasets.DownloadMode.FORCE_REDOWNLOAD)`

### Expected behavior

`
ValueError: Couldn't cast
id: string
level: string
context: list<element: string>
  child 0, element: string
type: string
answer: string
question: string
supporting_facts: list<element: string>
  child 0, element: string
fra_answer: string
fra_question: string
-- schema metadata --
huggingface: '{"info": {"features": {"id": {"dtype": "string", "_type": "' + 490
to
{'id': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'level': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'context': Sequence(feature=Value(dtype='string', id=None), length=-1, id=None), 'type': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'answer': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'question': Value(dtype='string', id=None), 'supporting_facts': Sequence(feature=Value(dtype='string', id=None), length=-1, id=None)}
because column names don't match

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

DatasetGenerationError
...
DatasetGenerationError: An error occurred while generating the dataset`

### Environment info

datasets-2.16.1 huggingface-hub-0.20.2

Comments: