Question: Did Employment Division v. Smith and Ex parte Young both have somone acting on their behalf?
Sentence (from "Employment Division v. Smith"): Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) , is a United States Supreme Court case that held that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote, even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.
Relevant evidence: No