Question: Do both United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. and Schmerber v. California address searches that intrude the human body?
Sentence (from "Samson v. California"): Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed the decision of the California Court of Appeal; which held that suspicionless searches of parolees are lawful under California law and that the search in this case was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it was not arbitrary, capricious, or harassing.
Relevant evidence: No