Question: Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire and South Dakota v. Dole, which was more about freedom of speech?
Sentence (from "South Dakota v. Neville"): South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prosecutors may use a suspect's refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test as evidence of guilt, and the introduction of this evidence at trial does not violate the suspect's Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination.
Relevant evidence: No