Question: United States v. Cruikshank and Ex parte Young were both cases decided in which US court?
Sentence (from "Ex parte McQuillon"): Over the objection of McQuillon's attorney, Judge Betts took no further action on the case, declaring that it would be indecorous to openly disagree with Chief Justice Taney's reasoning in "ex parte Merryman", but that the Constitution must be defended in whatever way it can be and the public would not want everyone to have access to habeas corpus during the Civil War.
Relevant evidence: No