The procuratorate received an anonymous report: Wang Mou defrauded a national ecological compensation fund. After investigation, the procuratorate investigators found that Wang Mou had engaged in bribery during the process of obtaining the compensation. To obtain evidence of Wang Mou's crime, the procuratorate temporarily seized the funds under the name of 'recovering illicit gains.' Wang Mou repeatedly reported the situation to higher-level procuratorates and petition departments, demanding the return of the funds, but to no avail. In 2010, under pressure from higher-ups, the local party and government leaders organized a collective reception, indicating that they would handle the matter according to law, while requiring Wang Mou not to 'unreasonably cause trouble or petition beyond his level.' Due to the prolonged unresolved case, Wang Mou repeatedly petitioned in Beijing. Soon, the procuratorate, due to insufficient evidence, decided not to prosecute Wang Mou and promised to return the funds. The day before the refund, the procuratorate approved Wang Mou's arrest on suspicion of contract fraud in another case. It was later confirmed that the funds Wang Mou received were legally entitled, and there was no fact of contract fraud in the other case. The procuratorate had illegally restricted Wang Mou's personal freedom to suppress his petitioning. Which of the following statements is correct?

Options:
A. Wang Mou has the right to expose and accuse the procuratorate and its case handlers for illegal acts to relevant authorities, but he must first file a formal complaint with the court, which falls under Wang Mou's right to lodge a complaint.
B. Wang Mou has the right to expose and accuse the procuratorate and its case handlers for illegal acts to relevant authorities, but he must first seek a resolution through internal channels, which falls under Wang Mou's right to lodge a complaint.
C. Wang Mou has the right to expose and request legal handling of the procuratorate and its case handlers for illegal dereliction of duty, which falls under Wang Mou's right to report.
D. Wang Mou's legal property rights and personal freedom were violated due to the procuratorate and its staff's illegal exercise of procuratorial power, and Wang Mou has the right to claim state compensation.
E. Wang Mou has the right to expose and accuse the procuratorate and its case handlers for illegal acts to relevant authorities, which falls under Wang Mou's right to lodge a complaint.
F. Wang Mou has the right to expose and accuse the procuratorate and its case handlers for illegal acts to relevant authorities, but he must first file a formal complaint with the procuratorate, which falls under Wang Mou's right to lodge a complaint.
G. Wang Mou has the right to expose and accuse the procuratorate and its case handlers for illegal acts to relevant authorities, but he must provide concrete evidence to support his claims, which falls under Wang Mou's right to lodge a complaint.
H. Wang Mou has the right to expose and accuse the procuratorate and its case handlers for illegal acts to relevant authorities, but he must first file a formal complaint with a higher-level procuratorate, which falls under Wang Mou's right to lodge a complaint.
I. Wang Mou has the right to expose and accuse the procuratorate and its case handlers for illegal acts to relevant authorities, but he must first obtain permission from the procuratorate, which falls under Wang Mou's right to lodge a complaint.
J. Wang Mou's legal property rights and personal freedom were violated due to the procuratorate's erroneous and illegal decisions, and he has the right to appeal the reasons to relevant authorities and request a retrial, which falls under Wang Mou's right to appeal.
Answer: E