Input: [Business] Sunrise Breakfast Shop [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pop's Diner Co. [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] The Egg Bistro [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Sunrise Breakfast Shop [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Tommy's Restaurant [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Hampton [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] D'Egg [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Yorgo's Bageldashery [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Charlie's Cafe [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Bojangles' - Carrollton [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Suffolk-Franklin-Isle of Wight [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pop's Diner Co. [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Citrus Breakfast & Lunch [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Bojangles' [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Breakfast [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] No Frill Bar & Grill [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Woody McGees Barstro [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Freemason Abbey [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Cotton Southern Bistro [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] The Egg Bistro [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Freemason Abbey [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pasha Mezze [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] No Frill Bar & Grill [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Woody McGees Barstro [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Lynnhaven Fish House Restaurant [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Murphy's - A Grand Irish Pub [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Brunch [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Captain George's Seafood [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Golden Corral Buffet & Grill [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Rajput Indian Cuisine [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Greenbrier Buffet [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Golden Corral Buffet & Grill [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Buffet City [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Newport News [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Nawab [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Rajput Indian Cuisine [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Nawab [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Golden Corral Buffet & Grill [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Captain George's Seafood [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Buffet City [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Western Branch-Churchland-North Suffolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Szechuan Inn [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Western Branch-Churchland-North Suffolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Nawab [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Buffet [Contest/City] Williamsburg [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Five Guys Burgers and Fries [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Woody McGees Barstro [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] 80/20 Burger Bar [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Five Guys Burgers and Fries [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] The Grill at Great Bridge [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Cotton Southern Bistro [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Belmont House of Smoke [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] 80/20 Burger Bar [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Five Guys Burgers and Fries [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Smoked Out [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Woody McGees Barstro [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Burtons Grill [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Burger [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pollard's Chicken [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Gourmet Gang Inc. [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Cuisine & Company [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pollard's Chicken [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Bite Restaurant & Catering [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pollard's Chicken [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Norfolk [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] The Catering Place [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Suffolk-Franklin-Isle of Wight [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pollard's Chicken [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] High Tide Catering [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Cuisine & Company [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Sweetwater Cuisine [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Gourmet Gang Inc. [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Caterer [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Bronze

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] The Melting Pot [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Cheese Course [Contest/City] Newport News [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] The Melting Pot [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Cheese Course [Contest/City] Virginia Beach [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pollard's Chicken [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Chicken [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Farm Fresh Supermarkets [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Chicken [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Popeye's Chicken & Biscuits [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Chicken [Contest/City] Best of the Best [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Honorable Mention

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Pollard's Chicken [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Chicken [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Gold

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Business] Farm Fresh Supermarkets [Meta Category] Food & Fun - Food [Category] Best Chicken [Contest/City] Chesapeake [Year] 2013 [Place]

Output: Silver

Best of Hampton Roads - Past Winners | Best Of Hampton Roads


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 2nd in uncontested possessions per game [Sydney Ranking] 6th in least opponent uncontested possessions per game [Category]

Output: Uncontested Possession

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 7th in marks per game [Sydney Ranking] 6th in least opponent marks per game [Category]

Output: Marks

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 2nd in marks Inside 50 per game [Sydney Ranking] 4th in least opponent marks Inside 50 [Category]

Output: Marks Inside 50

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 2nd in disposals per game [Sydney Ranking] 10th in least opponent disposals per game [Category]

Output: Disposals

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 1st in disposal efficiency [Sydney Ranking] 1st in lowest opponent disposals efficiency per game [Category]

Output: Disposal Efficiency

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 2nd in kicks per game [Sydney Ranking] 11th in least opponent kicks per game [Category]

Output: Kicks

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 5th in handballs per game [Sydney Ranking] 8th in least opponent handballs per game [Category]

Output: Handballs

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 1st in effective disposals per game [Sydney Ranking] 5th in least opponent effective disposals per game [Category]

Output: Effective Kicks

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 2nd in team to opponent clearances per game differential [Sydney Ranking] 10th in team to opponent clearances per game differential [Category]

Output: Clearances

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Hawthorn Ranking] 3rd in fewest turnovers per game [Sydney Ranking] 3rd in most opponent turnovers per game [Category]

Output: Turnovers

AFL Grand Final preview: Full breakdown and stats | The Roar


Input: [Category] Best Overall Member [Winner] xGhostx [Prize]

Output: Site Moderator


Input: [Category] Best Mission Designer [Winner] Jimmy_Leppard [Prize]

Output: Site Moderator


Input: [Category] Best Mission [Winner] DYOM PUZZLE [Prize]

Output: pinned on site


Input: [Category] Best Mission Pack [Winner] The Runaway [Prize]

Output: pinned on site


Input: [Category] Best Storyline [Winner] Cold Year [Prize]

Output: Pinned on site


Input: [Category] Most Missed Member [Winner] Mattatatta [Prize]

Output: Mention in the DYOM General Thread


Input: [Category] Most helpful in DYOM forums [Winner] Secronom President [Prize]

Output: Site Moderator


Input: [Category] Best DYOM tutorial [Winner] Chimpso [Prize]

Output: Pinned


Input: [Category] Best DYOM video [Winner] Maniacs With Chainsaw (by LnD) [Prize]

Output: Featured on site frontpage


Input: [Category] Best Topic in DYOM forums [Winner] The Designers Lounge [Prize]

Output: Pinned


Input: [Category] Best review maker [Winner] AznKei [Prize]

Output: Pinned


Input: [Category] Best Moderator [Winner] Secronom President [Prize]

Output: Site Moderator


Input: [Year] 1880 [Status]

Output: All McGillicuddy families reviewed


Input: [Year] 1890 [Status]

Output: Entries for Hambone County are not available


Input: [Year] 1900 [Status]

Output: All McGillicuddy families reviewed


Input: [Year] 1910 [Status]

Output: All McGillicuddy families reviewed


Input: [Year] 1920 [Status]

Output: In progress


Input: [Year] 1930 [Status]

Output: Not reviewed yet


Input: [Bobby Deren scarletnation.com] In spite of Cincinnati's quarterback issues, the Bearcats can still move the football. Cincy ranks 33rd in the nation in total offense while running back George Winn has already compiled 990 rushing yards. The Cincinnati spread offense is capable of putting points up in a hurry and leads the Big East in scoring offense. Rutgers has struggled with bouts of inconsistency on offense and the questionable status of running back Jawan Jamison could hamstring the offensive production as a whole. The edge here goes to the Bearcats. Cincinnati. Head Coach Butch Jones has been hesitant to admit it, but this is a completely different team with Brendon Kay at QB, instead of Munchie Legaux. Two things have changed for UC since the QB swap. The deep pass is now a constant option and turnovers are way, way down. Kay accounts for 22.2% of the deep completions by UC even though he has only thrown 10.1% of the team's passes. Before the change, the passing attacks were equal. Now UC runs (228.8 per) and passes (226.8 per) better. [1]

Output: Which team has the more potent offense?

ScarletNation.com - Rutgers vs Cincinnati: Who has the edge?


Input: [Bobby Deren scarletnation.com] Jawan Jamison. His right ankle could dictate the ebb and flow of the Rutgers offense. If Jamison can prove effective, it will give the entire offense a jolt. Without Jamison, the RU offense will have to rely on backup running back Savon Huggins, who has yet to start a college game. It could also put more pressure on quarterback Gary Nova to come up with some big plays of his own. If Jamison does not play, his absence will affect the offense and force the Scarlet Knights to play without their top offensive weapon. He would not have been labeled such two weeks ago, but Ralph David Abernathy has had a quiet month of November. The sparkling talent out of Westminster High (GA) needs to inject his explosive runs, catches, and returns into this game. When you face a run defense as formidable as Rutgers', it takes a handful of splash plays to overcome. Sure George Winn will carry the ball countless times, but RDA is more apt to break a big one off with his remarkably elusive style. [1]

Output: Who is the Offensive 'X Factor,' and why?

ScarletNation.com - Rutgers vs Cincinnati: Who has the edge?


Input: [Bobby Deren scarletnation.com] Rutgers has relied on its defense through the course of the season and the play of that unit is a major reason why the Scarlet Knights boast an 8-1 record. Khaseem Greene looks to be heading towards his second-straight Big east defensive player of the year award and the unit is laden with upperclassmen. The RU defense ranks 14th in the country in total defense, balancing its attack against both the run and the pass. The Bearcats have registered an impressive 22 sacks on the season, but seem to be allowing a high number of points against quality opponents. Rutgers has the better defense of the two teams. Rutgers. Though statistically nearby in rush defense, the Bearcats simply don't compare in turnover margin or total defense. The Bearcats are better at disturbing the passer with a 23 team sacks, but DL Coach Steve Stripling wants more from his troops. Continuity makes the RU D consistently great. Six of the defensive starters have started in excess of 20-straight games heading into Saturday. [1]

Output: Which team has the better defense?

ScarletNation.com - Rutgers vs Cincinnati: Who has the edge?


Input: [Bobby Deren scarletnation.com] Steve Beauharnais. Against the hurry-up Bearcat offense, the middle linebacker will be entrusted with lining up the RU defense and calling plays at a much quicker pace. The senior captain will also need to force some plays just as he has done all year. Beauharnais' stats may not be as impressive as his fellow starting linebackers, but he is able to force quite a few plays their way. Look for Beauharnais to again do a lot of the dirty work on Saturday. A big game from him could pay big dividends for the Scarlet Knights. UC DB Arryn Chenault. Rutgers has more known quantities on defense, while Cincinnati has been plugging in several backups on the back end of their defense. Look for Arryn Chenault and Kevin Brown to provide disruptive challenges to RU receivers. Chenault has not been this healthy for three weeks. Two early season interceptions established the first-year starter as a reliable safety. [1]

Output: Who is the defensive 'X Factor,' and why?

ScarletNation.com - Rutgers vs Cincinnati: Who has the edge?


Input: [Bobby Deren scarletnation.com] Rutgers has been masterful in blocking kicks this season and have more than any other team in the nation (7). The kicking and punting game have both been a bit shaky as punter Justin Doerner has struggled all season. RU has been forced to turn to walk-on Nick Borgese in the absence of true freshman Kyle Federico but field goal attempts have been at a minimum in recent weeks. Cincinnati ranks in the top 20 in both kickoff and punt returns while field goal kickerTomy Milano has connected on all his field goal attempts inside the 40-yard line and is 12-16 on the season. UC's Ralph Abernathy and RU's Jeremy Deering are both dangerous kick returners with big play ability. Adding up all the plusses and minuses, this one looks like an even draw. Cincinnati. Best Pro Prospect: Punter Patrick O'Donnell. Rehabilitating from a tender leg muscle, "POD" has world-class strength and even touch. He places countless punts inside the opposing 20 and routinely changes the complexion of games with his blasts. Highlighting the Virginia Tech win was Munchie Legaux's final pass play, but the game was close because O'Donnell buried VT deep all afternoon. Also watch out for KR Ralph David Abernathy. [1]

Output: Who has the edge on special teams?

ScarletNation.com - Rutgers vs Cincinnati: Who has the edge?


Input: [Bobby Deren scarletnation.com] Cincinnati's offense is built for exactly these situations. The up-tempo spread offense can cover a lot of ground in quite a hurry. However, UC starter Brendon Kay is not the most experienced of quarterbacks with only 34 career pass attempts. Although the offense is suited for this type of situation, he's far from polished when it comes to facing those kind of situations. On the other side of the ball, Rutgers has an abundance of downfield threats and Nova has proven that he can engineer lengthy drives in a short span of time. But the way these offenses are designed, the edge here swings in Cincy's favor. Rutgers. The Knights protect their king better than anyone in the Big East. Rarely does RU accept a drive-killing sack. Though he has shown many strengths QB Kay did take two against a feeble Temple defense. Rutgers will have the option of sustaining drives as long as the Bearcats give RU time to survey the field. [1]

Output: If the game comes down to a final drive, which team drives the length of the field?

ScarletNation.com - Rutgers vs Cincinnati: Who has the edge?


Input: [Bobby Deren scarletnation.com] Start No.2 will be a stiff test for inexperienced fifth-year senior starting quarterback Brendon Kay. The Rutgers defense will prove to be just too much for Kay and company. Rutgers will again rely on the strength of its defense to pull out another win and having a vast surplus of senior leaders will pay off. Offensively, the Scarlet Knights should be able to find a way to put enough points on the board to keep them undefeated in Big East play. Rutgers 24 Cincinnati 17. Frustrated by an imposing defense, Cincinnati will be embroiled in a muddy battle of wills and grit. For years this game would be a Bearcat loss for sure, but the running game is surprisingly powerful in 2012 thanks in large part to a cohesive offensive line. As long as the back end of UC holds up, the Bearcats win 20-10 and George Winn rushes 25 times. [1]

Output: Which team will win?

ScarletNation.com - Rutgers vs Cincinnati: Who has the edge?


Input: [Trophy name] Diana Britten Trophy [Trophy holder] Corrinne Dennis [Awarded for...]

Output: Highest female percent scored at 3 events

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Extra Trophy [Trophy holder] Mark Jefferies [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points flying Extra aircraft

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Glider Trophy [Trophy holder] Paul Conran [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points flying in glider contests

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Golden Frog Trophy [Trophy holder] Tom Cassells [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points flying French aircraft

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Manx Kelly Trophy [Trophy holder] Gary Ferriman [Awarded for...]

Output: Total point at Advanced contests

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Marcus Norman Trophy [Trophy holder] Richard Buchan [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points at Standard Unknown sequences

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Pitts Special Trophy [Trophy holder] Gary Ferriman [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points flying a Pitts Special

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Shaggy Cow Trophy [Trophy holder] Ian Trask [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points flying Yakovlev aircraft

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Slingsby Trophy [Trophy holder] Alex Smith [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points flying Slingsby aircraft

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Swinstead Trophy [Trophy holder] Clive Butler [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points at Intermediate contests

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Trophy name] Tiger Club Trophy [Trophy holder] Richard Buchan [Awarded for...]

Output: Total points at Standard contests

BAeA Champion & Trophy holders, 2004 | BAeA, British Aerobatic Association


Input: [Player] Perry Ellis [New Rank] #10 [Difference] 10 [Notes]

Output: Ellis simply dominated at the end of his high school basketball season as he helped guide his high school to a third straight state championship and 44 game win streak. He was also recognized by MaxPreps for the Junior All American 1st team, ESPN Rise for the All-American First Team and USA Today for the All-USA 2nd team, all in the past week.

Recruit Rankings | National Recruiting Spotlight


Input: [Player] Marcus Paige [New Rank] #16 [Difference] 9 [Notes]

Output: He had a very nice stroke at the Nike EYBL as he made the majority of his three-pointers and nearly every mid-range jumper he took at the top of the key. His passing was even better when he displayed excellent court vision and anticipation as he seemed to know exactly where and when his teammates would be open. He also played smart and used dribble-penetration consistently and effectively.

Recruit Rankings | National Recruiting Spotlight


Input: [Player] Jarnell Stokes [New Rank] #17 [Difference] 9 [Notes]

Output: After an impressive showing at the Nike EYBL two weekends ago, Stokes again played well at the Real Deal in the Rock. The most impressive aspect of Stokes’ improved play was the fact that he went up against two top 10 prospects in Grant Jerrett (#8) and Kaleb Tarczewski (#6) and was able to beat the two elite big men in two completely different ways. Against Jerrett, he went right after him in the low post and used his strength to control the paint and get up easy shots. Against Tarczewski, he used his perimeter skills to create shots in the mid-range and even hit the three-ball.

Recruit Rankings | National Recruiting Spotlight


Input: [Player] Alex Poythress [New Rank] #25 [Difference] 5 [Notes]

Output: He did a variety of things very well at the Nike EYBL such as blocking shots, running the floor, finishing, playing defense, and shooting. He also displayed good ball-handling skills as well as a nice spin move which got him some open looks in the lane where he converted. Poythress did an excellent job using his length too whether it was through changing opponents’ shots, shooting over defenders, or being able to pass in difficult situations.

Recruit Rankings | National Recruiting Spotlight


Input: [Player] Torian Graham [New Rank] #30 [Difference] 8 [Notes]

Output: Graham displayed his prolific scoring skills at the King James Shooting Stars Classic as he used his outstanding athleticism to consistently get by his defender and to get into the lane. Once he got into the paint, he finished around the rim extremely well whether it was through contact or around it. He also exhibited a tremendous mid-range game where he knocked down pull-up jumpers off the dribble.

Recruit Rankings | National Recruiting Spotlight


Input: [Player] Braxton Ogbueze [New Rank] #37 [Difference] 5 [Notes]

Output: Ogbueze put his full arsenal on display at the Nike EYBL as he showed good ball-handling skills, good shooting, and the ability to get to the bucket consistently. He also showed good range and had a nice spin move he used to get into the lane. Ogbueze had a nice floater and mid-range jumper he constantly used after he got by his initial defender as well.

Recruit Rankings | National Recruiting Spotlight


Input: [Player] Matt Costello [New Rank] #36 [Difference] 8 [Notes]

Output: Matt Costello dominated at the King James Shooting Stars Classic this past weekend by displaying superb offensive games and a variety of ways to score. He also showed the ability to knock down three-pointers and mid-range jumpers while scoring in the paint with their back to the basket as well. Costello ran the floor well too and exhibited an impressive skill set in the low post where he used spin moves, hook shots and up-and-under moves to get his shot off.

Recruit Rankings | National Recruiting Spotlight


Input: [Player] Devonta Pollard [New Rank] #40 [Difference] 10 [Notes]

Output: Pollard also dominated at the King James Shooting Stars Classic and displayed the ability to do many different things. He handled the ball well, made impressive passes and constantly blocked shots and scored in a plethora of ways. Pollard scored from the perimeter, mid-range game and from the low-post with both his back to the basket and while facing the basket.

Recruit Rankings | National Recruiting Spotlight


Input: [No.] 1 [Name] Greg Robinson [School] Auburn [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 6.71 [LZ Says...]

Output: As powerful at the point of attack as any offensive lineman I've studied. Dominates in run game with great leverage and strong hands. Needs to dial back desire to destroy defender with each snap and play under control. Lunges and takes bad angles at times in pass protection, but both issues are coachable as Robinson has had limited experience in protection. His dominant traits (including foot quickness for his size and length) lead me to believe that he could be a long-time All-Pro tackle. Likely to go through growing pains as a rookie, but will develop into dominant talent.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 2 [Name] Jake Matthews [School] Texas A&M [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 6.53 [LZ Says...]

Output: Matthews is the most game-ready offensive lineman in the draft. Doesn't feature elite physical traits, but is an outstanding run and pass blocker who is plug and play from the day he signs his contract. Times his hands and feet perfectly and is unmatched in this draft as a technician. Longer DEs can get into his chest at times but that isn't an overwhelming concern. Not as long as you would like at the LT spot, but his talent and skill makes up for that.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 3 [Name] Taylor Lewan [School] Michigan [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 6.33 [LZ Says...]

Output: Lewan has great length and is the premier athlete at the tackle position in this draft. Has the feet to make any and ever block imaginable, but doesn't always take proper angles to get across the face of 3-techs. Plays with a good base in pass protection and has enough bend and anchor to handle bull rushers. Technique needs some refining, but Lewan is a first round talent and features the traits that should make him a good NFL starter at LT.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 4 [Name] Xavier Su'a Filo [School] UCLA [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 6.17 [LZ Says...]

Output: Powerful and nasty. Su'a-Filo features fluid hips and can get around the corner with good quickness when asked to pull and usually finds and hits his target. Will play to and past the whistle. Has the foot quickness and strength to redirect when needed. Tends to get caught up on first man and takes too long to come off and pick up second rusher on twists. Gives up more pressure in pass protection than you want. His ability to move well and play with plus power will make him a late 1st round to early 2nd round target.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 5 [Name] Cyrus Kouandjio [School] Alabama [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 6.15 [LZ Says...]

Output: Kouandjio had a bit of a disappointing final season and has some medical concerns that may take him off the board for certain teams. Plays too high and loses leverage at times, but does show enough anchor to battle back mid-snap. Outstanding foot quickness into his pass sets and has great length to protect the edges. Leverage is a concern on the next level. He must play with lower pad level.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 6 [Name] Zack Martin [School] Notre Dame [Pos.] OT, G [Overall Grade] 6.13 [Other Position] 6.21 [LZ Says...]

Output: I have Martin as a guard due to his short arms and lack of length for the position. He's a persistent run blocker who latches on and finishes. Plays with a wide, strong base and can drop anchor when needed. Technically proficient with a good punch in pass pro. Won't overwhelm with athletic traits but is a good football player who can be plugged in right away and be successful. Can play in any scheme.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 7 [Name] Brandon Thomas [School] Clemson [Pos.] OT, G [Overall Grade] 6.13 [Other Position] 6.08 [LZ Says...]

Output: My draft grade is based on the talent and does not reflect his ACL tear. Has very powerful hands and is able to engage and overpower opponents with his patented "torque" move. Is shorter than you would like for a tackle but moves his feet well in to play the position in the NFL if a team wants to look there first. Has some issues getting across the face of the defender in run game. Adept at shutting down inside moves with power and strong inside step. Highly underrated and undervalued by some, but Thomas should be a very good NFL guard when he makes it back from his achilles injury.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 8 [Name] Morgan Moses [School] Virginia [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 5.97 [LZ Says...]

Output: Bad-bodied, long-armed tackle who displays a stiff lower body and has issues changing direction or run blocking in space. With that said, he gets guys blocked. That trumps the other issues. Moses understands angles and how to use his length and flashes substantial pop when DEs try to beat him inside. I have concerns about whether Moses' lack of athleticism on the next level and he will always struggle to get back-side blocks on the LBs in the running game.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 9 [Name] Joel Bitonio [School] Nevada [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 5.58 [Other Position] 5.50 [Zone Grade] 5.67 [LZ Says...]

Output: One of the most tenacious linemen in the draft. Never quits on a play and will win some battles by outworking and outlasting defenders. Can play tackle or guard. Aggressive at the point of attack, but doesn't generate as much power as you expect - even when he's on the move. Anchors effectively against power and has high football character. Scheme and position versatility should raise his stock.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 10 [Name] Cameron Fleming [School] Stanford [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 5.51 [LZ Says...]

Output: Plays with consistency and within himself. Fleming is well-coached and flashes consistent power and aggressiveness as a run blocker. Despite being heavy-legged, is fairly consistent with his pass sets and does a decent job of protecting the edge. Limited athleticism means he must play in power scheme and will need some help against legitimate edge speed on the next level. He's not for everyone, but his toughness and plus run blocking make will make him more attractive to some teams than you think.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 11 [Name] Weston Richburg [School] Colorado State [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 5.45 [LZ Says...]

Output: He's the best center in this draft. Plays with a terrifc anchor despite being high-cut and maintains desireable body control in hand-to-hand battles or in space. Has plus feet and was effective getting out and pulilng at Colorado State. Doesn't generate plus power at the point of attack, but usually holds his own. Scouting community raves about his leadership qualities and take-charge attitude at practice and in games.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 12 [Name] Billy Turner [School] North Dakota State [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 5.43 [Other Position] 5.26 [Zone Grade] 5.46 [LZ Says...]

Output: Turner had issues in protection in one-on-one drills at the Senior Bowl, but they were primarily technique-related and they might be coachable for him. He has stated he would like to play guard in the NFL and I consider that to be his primary position with tackle as secondary. Plays with an aggressive demeanor and plays hard. Climbs to the second level quickly and flashes good body control in space. Has a good anchor and can recover and redirect against blitzers. Plays out of control at times.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 13 [Name] Trai Turner [School] Louisiana State [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 5.42 [Zone Grade] 5.51 [LZ Says...]

Output: Doesn't look like much on the hoof, but don't let that fool you because he will take it to defensive tackles. Has good feet and does a nice job of working for position when moving laterally. Is able to sustain blocks on the move or on the second level. Can get moved off his spot against power, but has enough core to survive against brute force. Hard worker and best-suited for a team looking to play in space.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 14 [Name] Dakota Dozier [School] Furman [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 5.41 [LZ Says...]

Output: Played tackle in college but is best-suited to play guard in the NFL. He's always looking to finsih and plays with a chip on his shoulder. Powerful run blocker who can win in tight quarters. Has issues with change of direction and can get off-balance. Gets too grabby when it isn't even necessary at times. Will potential to be a wall inside vs. pass rush. May need a year under his belt to gain necessary experience.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 15 [Name] Jack Mewhort [School] Ohio State [Pos.] OT, G [Overall Grade] 5.39 [Other Position] 5.43 [LZ Says...]

Output: Solid in many areas but isn't noticably strong in any one area. Mewhort flashes power in his hands lacks explosive power as a run blocker. Shows good body control as a second level run blocker changes directions well enough to play tackle in the NFL. I liked him better the first time I studied him but noticed more flaws when studying him again months later. Might be best suited to play guard. Despite average athleticism, he has enough foot quickness and function strength to fit into all schemes at guard.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 16 [Name] Corey Linsley [School] Ohio State [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 5.39 [LZ Says...]

Output: One of the most "under the radar" center prospects in this draft despite playing at Ohio State. Linley is unmatched in this year's draft from a power standpoint at the center position and would overwhelm weaker interior linemen. Solid lateral movement and ability to hit moving targets in run game. Will have trouble with A-gap blitzers and change of direction in pass pro can be uneven. Said to be borderline "arrogant, but in a good way", Linsley has mentality that teams want from centers and unusual power from a center.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 17 [Name] Ja'Wuan James [School] Tennessee [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 5.17 [LZ Says...]

Output: His bread will be buttered in pass protection. If he struggles, he won't be an NFL starter. Lacks power and fails to consistently sustain as a run blocker. Flashes good foot quickness to cut off the edge and re-direct back inside. More quick than fast. Solid in pass protection but has to prove he can anchor against bull-rushers. If James can get stronger, he has a chance to be a solid NFL RT.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 18 [Name] Seantrel Henderson [School] Miami (FL) [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 5.05 [LZ Says...]

Output: Elite size, mass and length and moves well in space. Has issues with balance and struggles to change directions against inside moves. Henderson drops his head too often and misses his target in running game. Length allows him to stymie edge rushers, but rushers will a variety of moves will cause Henderson issues no matter how long the arms. Severe concern over football character and despite the grade I have on him, I wouldn't draft him in any round.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 19 [Name] Marcus Martin [School] Southern California [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 5.04 [LZ Says...]

Output: Flexible bender with good quickness off of the snap. Has functional core strength but not a strong player. Too often will be looking side to side in pass protection with nobody to block when he could be helping guard to secure a block. Body control doesn't match your expectations. Can get to any run block asked of him and has enough leverage to anchor despite lack of weight room strength.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 20 [Name] Gabe Jackson [School] Mississippi State [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 4.99 [LZ Says...]

Output: Wide, thick frame allows him to drop anchor against power, but 1-gap defenders will cause him trouble. Lets his hands get too wide. Powerful punch and can get guys turned in run game. Faced strong competition at DT while in SEC. Jackson carries excessive bad weight and needs to play lighter.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 21 [Name] Cyril Richardson [School] Baylor [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 4.91 [LZ Says...]

Output: Massive guard with the ability to move to the second level quicker than you expect. Has difficulty changing direction and sustaining blocks and his power is generated more by his sheer size rather than natural strength. Will struggle to regroup and recover when beaten. Plays too highly and loses leverage. Has potential in a power scheme but needs more strength and technique work. Won't be bull-rushed and has good pop in his hands.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 22 [Name] James Hurst [School] North Carolina [Pos.] OT, G [Overall Grade] 4.89 [Other Position] 4.91 [LZ Says...]

Output: Brings his lunch pail and gets to work, but his lunch pail won't be enough to say at LT in the pros. Is an average athlete and relies on his upper body strength to get guys blocked. Plays with a low pad level and keeps his feet churning in run game. Has very everage body control and movement skills for the tackle position. Will have to play RT or be bumped inside to guard.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 23 [Name] David Yankey [School] Stanford [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 4.75 [LZ Says...]

Output: Solid guard at Stanford who played with consistency and got guys blocked. Lacks an NFL trait to really hang his hat on. Yankey isn't very powerful and is letthargic out of his stance when asked to pull. Plays with sound technique and displays good awareness and ability in pass protection. Limited athleticism dooms him to just a fit with power team.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 24 [Name] Antonio Richardson [School] Tennessee [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 4.74 [LZ Says...]

Output: Richardson features a strong anchor to go with his oustanding length and is rarely bull-rushed. Doesn't bend well so can't translate weight room power into running game power. Struggles badly against inside moves and in change-of-direction situations. Might be a servicable RT with enough help, but lack of body control will always be a problem as he'll have a hard time keeping defenders in the middle of his power zone.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 25 [Name] Travis Swanson [School] Arkansas [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 4.74 [LZ Says...]

Output: Better straight line movement than lateral movement. Takes awhile to get around the corner when asked to pull. Displays good posture and adequate bend in pass protection and can withstand power better than his 20 bench press reps would lead you to believe. Catches pass rush too often rather than punch. Durable, experienced SEC starter who has handled himself well against plus athletes and power.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 26 [Name] Anthony Steen [School] Alabama [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 4.70 [LZ Says...]

Output: Stubby frame with short arms, Steen is hardly impressive to look at. On the other hand, he is good technician in pass protectionn and uses his hands very well. Steen moves okay in space and takes pretty good angles. While I'm higher on Steen than some others based on his anchor strength and hand usage, his short arms are a major concern.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 27 [Name] Michael Schofield [School] Michigan [Pos.] OT, G [Overall Grade] 4.66 [Other Position] 4.66 [Zone Grade] 4.73 [LZ Says...]

Output: Experienced college tackle with good technique but has problems against explosive power. Core strength may be an on-going issue for him, but if he can get stronger, has the technique and feet to compete for a starting job. Displays good foot quickness and takes proper angles with second level blocks. His best position might be guard with a team who features zone scheme.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 28 [Name] Wesley Johnson [School] Vanderbilt [Pos.] G, C [Overall Grade] 4.61 [Other Position] 4.61 [Zone Grade] 4.64 [LZ Says...]

Output: Actually graded out better as a tackle, his college position, as opposed to as an interior lineman. Too light to play tackle, but could be a fit at guard or center in zone scheme with roster flexibility to play tackle in a pinch. Smooth in pass sets with ability to counter inside moves and change directions. Not a physical speciman and will get pushed around at times in the NFL, but is well-schooled and gets more the most from his frame. Should be a very good value pick as a center.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 29 [Name] Justin Britt [School] Missouri [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 4.51 [Other Position] 4.45 [Zone Grade] 4.53 [LZ Says...]

Output: Tenacious worker who also uses good foot quickness to gain advanatagees. Lacks functional strength and can get pushed around. May lack enough anchor to play inside for any team other than strict zone scheme, but not nothing more than a backup as a tackle.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 30 [Name] Brandon Linder [School] Miami (FL) [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 4.22 [Zone Grade] 4.28 [LZ Says...]

Output: Has played guard and tackle, but is a guard-only on the next level. Can make blocks on the move and climbs to his second level target quickly and with good angles. Lacks anchor and has a hard to holding his ground against leverage-oriented DTs. Lack of strenght leads to "panicked hands" which get way too wide in pass protection. Has good frame and movement skills but may be overmatched by NFL power.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 31 [Name] Matt Patchan [School] Boston College [Pos.] OT, G [Overall Grade] 4.21 [Other Position] 4.27 [Zone Grade] 4.34 [LZ Says...]

Output: Hard to find a tackle who gets off the ball and into a defender quicker than Patchan. Uses explosiveness off of the snap and outstanding foot quickness to win as a run blocker. When asked to play with power will struggle. Gets jostled too often in pass protection due to lack of functional strength. Has some character concerns to check out. His foot quickness will make a coveted target by a zone team.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 32 [Name] Jon Halapio [School] Florida [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 4.19 [LZ Says...]

Output: Punishing power when he gets into his man. Generates push from powerful lower body and can beat people up in the phone booth. Power to redirect, but feet don't always cooperate. Will struggle against interior quickness and must play downhill as angles in run blocking will be hit or miss. Power gives him a chance to succeed and I like his chances if he gets with the right team.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 33 [Name] Bryan Stork [School] Florida State [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 4.14 [LZ Says...]

Output: Good strength at the point of attack but is limited athletically and is inconsistent with second level blocks. While anchor and power are a plus, hard to see him being a difference maker rather than just a decent center.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 34 [Name] Spencer Long [School] Nebraska [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 4.09 [LZ Says...]

Output: Fluid movement in space and able to play with some pop on the move but isn't a power player when asked to handle man in front of him. Good pass protection technique but change of direction is a major concern and the reason I'm concerned about him. Also, injury history has to be studied. Not sure he has one part of his game that he can point to as a definitive strength. Has an NFL frame.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 35 [Name] Laurent Duvernay-Tardif [Pos.] OT, G [Overall Grade] 4.05 [Other Position] 4.10 [Zone Grade] 4.15 [LZ Says...]

Output: Duvernay-Tardif's pro day results were off the charts and he dominated competition.... in Canada. Tardif has oustanding combination of power and quickness and has an athletic frame. His kick-slide and pass set are very smooth. A team will likely draft the traits within the first five rounds, but the question of how long it will take him to adjust to the NFL level of competition is a tough one to answer.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 36 [Name] Tyler Larsen [School] Utah State [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 3.96 [LZ Says...]

Output: While I like Larsen better than Bryan Stork as a talent, it is impossible not to penalize him for his short arms. Shows good upper body strength but has trouble sustaining blocks due ot lack of length. Takes smart angles to the second level but has no margin for error due to subpar lateral movement. Gets caught leaning too often and doesn't play with leverage. Scrappy but limited.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 37 [Name] John Urschel [School] Penn State [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 3.86 [Zone Grade] 3.93 [LZ Says...]

Output: Not much to look at from a physical standpoint, but when you watch him he rarely has consecutve bad snaps and works to overcome size/strength deficiencies. Smart player who takes great angles and keeps his feet working. Lacks physical tools but a willing zone blocker. Has an outside shot of making a roster, but I like him.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 38 [Name] Charles Leno [School] Boise State [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 3.58 [Zone Grade] 3.68 [LZ Says...]

Output: Fluid kick slide in pass protection and mirrored fairly well, but he doesn't have the frame to be an NFL tackle. Outstanding foot quickness makes him a zone scheme candidate but I don't think he is strong enough to make a roster right now. Might be best suited for a practice squad where he can try to get biggeer.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 39 [Name] Chris Watt [School] Notre Dame [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 3.55 [LZ Says...]

Output: Nothing I see from him gets me excited. Watt lacks core strength and allows defenders to get into him thanks to shorter arms. More of stalemate blocker than snap-winner and doesn't appear to be physically gifted enough to be anything more than a backup at best.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 41 [Name] Andrew Norwell [School] Ohio State [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 3.47 [LZ Says...]

Output: Shows anchor in pass protection and has plus size. No plus athletic traits or skills that stand out.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 42 [Name] Kadeem Edwards [School] Tennessee State [Pos.] G [Overall Grade] 3.47 [LZ Says...]

Output: My grade is lower than he probably deserves. I don't like the physical tools much at all, but I do like his playing demeanor. Body looks loose when engaged, but has a surprising amount of strength in his hands when he locks on. Battled like he belonged at Senior Bowl. Feet are just okay lacks power or refinement. Tenacious attitude will endear him to a team or two and that should get him drafted late.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 43 [Name] Cornelius Lucas [School] Kansas State [Pos.] OT [Overall Grade] 3.44 [LZ Says...]

Output: Former basketball player with ridiculously long arms and a frame that can easily add weight. Moves better than most with his high center of gravity and does a decent job of keeping defenders in front of him. Has issues anchoring and doesn't get much push in run game. Plays with toughness, but is a developmental project right now.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 44 [Name] Kevin Palmer [School] Baylor [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 3.28 [LZ Says...]

Output: Played right tackle for Baylor this season after injuries depleted the position. Is very stiff and plays too upright. Palmer fires out of snap and gets into his man quickly and is actually more effective at getting push than you would expect for a player with such little bend. Has some issues with sustaining in pass pro. Projects inside to center.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 45 [Name] Russell Bodine [School] North Carolina [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 3.23 [Other Position] 3.24 [Zone Grade] 3.31 [LZ Says...]

Output: Athletic testing and strength testing at the combine would lead you to believe that Bodine is one of the most gifted interior linemen in the draft, but the tape doesn't agree. Ridiculously sloppy hand usage and gets too grabby. Good cut blocker on the move and can play center or guard. Has issues anchoring.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 46 [Name] Gabe Ikard [School] Oklahoma [Pos.] C [Overall Grade] 3.19 [Zone Grade] 3.27 [LZ Says...]

Output: Very good foot quickness, but doesn't have power to match-up against NFL interiror linemen and ends up on the ground too often. Will be physically overwhelmed on the next level.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [No.] 47 [Name] Zach Fulton [School] Tennessee [Overall Grade] 3.19 [LZ Says...]

Output: Plays with a decent level of power in tight spaces. Is unable to move quickly enough to handle speed off the snap or change of direction from LBs and DTs. Lacks requisite athleticism to be a full-time starter.

Offensive Line Grades - 2014 NFL Draft | The Sideline View


Input: [Year] 1997 [Role] Chief Baker Joughin [Title]

Output: Titanic

Liam Tuohy - James Cameron's Titanic Wiki

Film


Input: [Year] 1998 [Role] Yoga Pupil [Title]

Output: The Souler Opposite

Liam Tuohy - James Cameron's Titanic Wiki

Film


Input: [Year] 2002 [Role] Mickser [Title]

Output: It Could Happen

Liam Tuohy - James Cameron's Titanic Wiki

Film


Input: [Year] 2005 [Role] Airline Passenger [Notes] uncredited appearance [Title]

Output: Red Eye

Liam Tuohy - James Cameron's Titanic Wiki

Film


Input: [Year] 2005 [Role] Senior Policeman [Title]

Output: Never Judge a Book

Liam Tuohy - James Cameron's Titanic Wiki

Film


Input: [Year] 2006 [Role] George Morrison [Title]

Output: Chase 'n Madi

Liam Tuohy - James Cameron's Titanic Wiki

Film


Input: [Year] 2007 [Role] Tom [Title]

Output: The Old Son

Liam Tuohy - James Cameron's Titanic Wiki

Film


Input: [Year] 2007 [Role] Bar Patron [Title]

Output: The Still Life

Liam Tuohy - James Cameron's Titanic Wiki

Film


Input: [Grade] B- [Comment] There are 2 great quarterbacks in this class, but then a bunch of guys which question marks. The teams that draft Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III have great signal callers that will be true franchise quarterbacks, with Luck possibly being the best to come out in a decade. After them, you have the inexperienced (Ryan Tannehill), the old (Brandon Weeden), and then comes the rest of the pack. [Position]

Output: Quarterback

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] C [Comment] Trent Richardson is the real deal with a full set of skills. But after him, there isn't really a first round worthy pick, and every back after him has a hole in his game, from pass blocking, to catching, to running outside, and even to running between the tackles. [Position]

Output: Running Back

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] B+ [Comment] There are few good fullbacks in this class with a couple of them being strong runners and blockers. Having a fullback that can step in as the tailback in today's NFL is a huge asset. [Position]

Output: Fullback

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] B [Comment] The elite wide receivers aren't quite the elite of some past years, but the depth of receivers makes the grade. Many are excellent options as a number 2 receiver and with some development quite a few could turn into number 1's. [Position]

Output: Wide Receiver

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] C+ [Comment] The tight end class doesn't have any top talent that will make impacts like Rob Gronkowski or Jimmy Graham, but has still has some playmakers. [Position]

Output: Tight End

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] B+ [Comment] Matt Kalil is one of the best left tackles in the last decade pushing this group up. Beyond him are a few more talented players, but the drop off is sudden with a large drop to the next tier of tackles. [Position]

Output: Offensive Tackle

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] B [Comment] An all around solid class with talent spread from top to the bottom of the draft. Drafting a guard in this draft will almost always be of good value with little need to reach unless a run happens. [Position]

Output: Guard

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] C- [Comment] Overall the centers in this class are not overly impressive. You have some guys that will be going higher than they really deserve because of the lack of talent available at the position. [Position]

Output: Center

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] A- [Comment] The tackles in this year's draft class are strong and plentiful, and only lacking an elite talent. There is no sure thing, top 5 pick this year, but you could have 5 of the first 32 picks be defensive tackles which would be impressive. More likely 3 are taken, but it shows the unusual strength of this year's class. [Position]

Output: Defensive Tackle

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] A [Comment] Getting the best grade in this draft class, the ends are numerous and versatile. They can generate pass rush and pull down running backs. Many can play inside on 3rd down for an extra rusher and some can step in as a 5-technique for the 3-4 defenses. [Position]

Output: Defensive End

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] B [Comment] As usual, there are a few good 3-4 linebackers available in the draft. But if you don't grab one by the end of the 3rd round, you'll be searching hard for guys that could convert. [Position]

Output: 3-4 Linebacker

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] B- [Comment] The outside linebacker position is a bit unusual in that you have some top talent and bottom talent, but not much in the middle. If you need a starting OLB, grab him early as after round 2 not many day 1 starters will be available. After that you can wait a few rounds before grabbing a developmental player. [Position]

Output: Outside Linebacker

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] B+ [Comment] Luke Kuechly is an unusual talent for the middle linebacker spot, a position normally ignored during the first round of the draft. He could make it into the top 10, and likely will go in the first round. Beyond him are a couple of other strong players making this one of the better inside linebacker draft classes. [Position]

Output: Inside Linebacker

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] A- [Comment] There are some very skilled corners in this draft and teams will be able to find guys to play press, man or zone coverage. Every round will see multiple corners taken and yet there will still be talent available. [Position]

Output: Cornerback

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] C+ [Comment] A few talented center fielders in this class and a couple of hard hitters make this a little above average safety class. [Position]

Output: Safety

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] C [Comment] No elite kickers that will be snagged on days 1 or 2, but some skilled booters that will be looked at to compete for the position in later rounds. [Position]

Output: Kicker

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] C [Comment] No elite punters that will be snagged on days 1 or 2, but some skilled booters that will be looked at to compete for the position in later rounds. [Position]

Output: Punter

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [Grade] C [Comment] Yep, there are some long snappers available... and maybe one of them will get drafted. [Position]

Output: Long Snapper

NFLDraft101: 2012 Positional Rankings and Grades


Input: [0] Saints [QB] Excellent [Run Game] Very Good [Defense] Very Good [Coaching] Good [Comments] The Saints rally behind Brees and believe in themselves [Special Teams]

Output: Very Good


Input: [0] Giants [QB] Very Good [Run Game] Excellent [Defense] Very Good [Coaching] Very Good [Comments] One Manning is having a lot of success on a team that works hard and knows it can win [Special Teams]

Output: Good


Input: [0] Colts [QB] Excellent [Run Game] Good [Defense] Good [Coaching] Good [Comments] The other Manning is the best QB in the game. Period. Everything else falls behind that fact [Special Teams]

Output: Good


Input: [0] Broncos [QB] Good [Run Game] Good [Defense] Good [Coaching] Good [Comments] A lot of luck has led the way, but getting rid of Cutler was a stroke of genius, and now Brandon Marshall is a "convert" to the philosphy [Special Teams]

Output: Good


Input: [0] Vikings [QB] Very Good [Run Game] Excellent [Defense] Very Good [Coaching] Good [Comments] A healthy Brett Favre is a great thing for a few games. The run game is what powers this team. And the defense doesn't hurt [Special Teams]

Output: Good


Input: [0] Jets [QB] Good [Run Game] Very Good [Defense] Very Good [Coaching] Good [Comments] Ryan's defense is the catalyst, but I still have my doubts about the consistency of Sanchez [Special Teams]

Output: Good


Input: [0] Bucs [QB] Bad [Run Game] Average [Defense] Average [Coaching] Average [Comments] There's a lack of talent on the team, a new coach, and a new QB [Special Teams]

Output: Bad


Input: [0] Titans [QB] Mediocre [Run Game] Very Good [Defense] Good [Coaching] Average [Comments] Coaching may be part of the issue here: why stick with Collins through 0-5? But special teams certainly is a critical factor. [Special Teams]

Output: Bad


Input: [0] Rams [QB] Bad [Run Game] Good [Defense] Bad [Coaching] Average [Comments] They also lack talent, and a new coach [Special Teams]

Output: Average


Input: [0] Chiefs [QB] Mediocre [Run Game] Good [Defense] Average [Coaching] Poor [Comments] Cassel made the most of his time in New England and benefitted from the schemes and support players. That's not quite enough in KC [Special Teams]

Output: Poor


Input: [GP] W [Games Played] Wins [GD] HOME [Goal Differential]

Output: Home Record

Manitoba Major Junior Hockey League - M.M.J.H.L. - mmjhl.ca


Input: [GP] L [Games Played] Losses [GD] AWAY [Goal Differential]

Output: Away Record

Manitoba Major Junior Hockey League - M.M.J.H.L. - mmjhl.ca


Input: [GP] T [Games Played] Ties [GD] L10 [Goal Differential]

Output: Last Ten Games Played Record

Manitoba Major Junior Hockey League - M.M.J.H.L. - mmjhl.ca


Input: [GP] OTL [Games Played] Overtime Losses [GD] PP% [Goal Differential]

Output: Power Play Percentage

Manitoba Major Junior Hockey League - M.M.J.H.L. - mmjhl.ca


Input: [GP] PTS [Games Played] Points [GD] PK% [Goal Differential]

Output: Penalty Kill Percentage

Manitoba Major Junior Hockey League - M.M.J.H.L. - mmjhl.ca


Input: [GP] GF [Games Played] Goals For [GD] STR [Goal Differential]

Output: Streak

Manitoba Major Junior Hockey League - M.M.J.H.L. - mmjhl.ca


Input: [GP] GA [Games Played] Goals Against [GD] WIN% [Goal Differential]

Output: Win Percentage

Manitoba Major Junior Hockey League - M.M.J.H.L. - mmjhl.ca


Input: Academy Awards [Top Box Office] Best Animated Feature [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Annie Awards [Top Box Office] Animated Theatrical Feature [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Critics Choice Awards [Top Box Office] Best Animated Feature [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Genesis Awards [Top Box Office] Feature Film' [Won]

Output: Won

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Golden Globes [Top Box Office] Best Original Song - Motion Picture (for the song "Here I Am") [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Golden Reel Award [Top Box Office] Best Sound Editing in Animated Features [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Golden Reel Award [Top Box Office] Best Sound Editing in Animated Features - Music [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Online Film Critics Society Awards [Top Box Office] Best Animated Feature [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Phoenix Film Critics Society Awards [Top Box Office] Best Animated Film [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Golden Satellite Awards [Top Box Office] Best Motion Picture, Animated or Mixed Media [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Visual Effects Society Awards [Top Box Office] Best Character Animation in an Animated Motion Picture [Won]

Output: Nominated

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Western Heritage Awards [Top Box Office] Theatrical Motion Picture [Won]

Output: Won

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: World Soundtrack Awards [Top Box Office] Best Original Song Written for a Film (for the song "This Is Where I Belong") [Won]

Output: Won

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: World Soundtrack Awards [Top Box Office] Best Original Song Written for a Film (for the song "Here I Am") [Won]

Output: Won

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: Young Artist Awards [Top Box Office] Best Family Feature Film - Animation [Won]

Output: Won

Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - Spirit Stallion of the Cimarron Wiki


Input: [AWARD] Kennedy Center Honors [YEAR] 1985 [AWARD NAME]

Output: Lifetime Achievement


Input: [AWARD] Academy Award [YEAR] 1949 [AWARD NAME]

Output: Nomination Best Actress for I Remember Mama


Input: [AWARD] Academy Award [YEAR] 1940 [AWARD NAME]

Output: Nomination Best Actress for Love Affair


Input: [AWARD] Academy Award [YEAR] 1938 [AWARD NAME]

Output: Nomination Best Actress for The Awful Truth


Input: [AWARD] Academy Award [YEAR] 1937 [AWARD NAME]

Output: Nomination Best Actress for Theodora Goes Wild


Input: [AWARD] Academy Award [YEAR] 1932 [AWARD NAME]

Output: Nomination Best Actress for Cimarron


Input: [Name] Video Award Bronze [Bonus Votes] 10 [Description]

Output: Awarded for a high quality original video with good production values.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Name] Video Award Silver [Bonus Votes] 15 [Description]

Output: Awarded for a high quality original video with good production values.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Name] Video Award Gold [Bonus Votes] 25 [Description]

Output: Awarded for a high quality original video with good production.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Name] Song Award Bronze [Bonus Votes] 10 [Description]

Output: Awarded for a well written original song.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Name] Song Award Silver [Bonus Votes] 15 [Description]

Output: Awarded for a well written original song.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Name] Song Award Gold [Bonus Votes] 25 [Description]

Output: Awarded for a well written original song.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Name] BEAT100 Favorite Video Award Bronze [Bonus Votes] 10 [Description]

Output: Awarded for being one of the BEAT100 favorite videos.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Name] BEAT100 Favorite Video Award Silver [Bonus Votes] 15 [Description]

Output: Awarded for being one of the BEAT100 favorite videos.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Name] BEAT100 Favorite Video Award Gold [Bonus Votes] 25 [Description]

Output: Awarded for being one of the BEAT100 favorite videos.

BEAT100 News - March 1st - BEAT100 updates prize pools and voting system


Input: [Season] 2015 [Team] Eurointernational [Role]

Output: Driver


Input: [Season] 2015 [Team] ART Grand Prix [Role]

Output: Driver


Input: [Season] 2014 [Team] Comtec Racing [Role]

Output: Test driver


Input: [Season] 2014 [Team] ART Grand Prix [Role]

Output: Driver


Input: [Season] 2014 [Team] Fortec Motorsports [Role]

Output: Driver


Input: [Season] 2014 [Team] Motopark Academy [Role]

Output: Test driver


Input: [Season] 2013 [Team] Lotus [Role]

Output: Driver


Input: [NFL Rank] 6th [Stat] 404.3 [Category]

Output: Total Yards Per Game

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 4th [Stat] 295.7 [Category]

Output: Total Yards Allowed Per Game

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 4th [Stat] 108.6 [Category]

Output: Net Yards Per Game Differential

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 4th [Stat] 318.7 [Category]

Output: Passing Net Yards Per Game

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 8th-tied [Stat] 22.0 [Category]

Output: First Downs Per Game

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 4th [Stat] 16.0 [Category]

Output: First Downs Allowed Per Game

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 7th [Stat] 45% [Category]

Output: Offensive Third Down Efficency

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 10th [Stat] 6.0 [Category]

Output: Punt Return Yards Allowed Average

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 5th [Stat] 44.1 [Category]

Output: Net Punting Yards Average

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 5th [Stat] 37.6 [Category]

Output: Net Punting Yards Allowed Average

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 15th-tied [Stat] 23.3 [Category]

Output: Points Per Game

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 5th [Stat] 12.7 [Category]

Output: Points Allowed Per Game

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [NFL Rank] 4th-tied [Stat] 10.6d [Category]

Output: Points Per Game Differential

New Orleans Saints statistical notes from Week 3


Input: [no] 1 [Category] Opening [Bad] Move 35 — This was a bad move that allowed White to get a nice result on the upper right. [Good]

Output: Move 11 — Decisively ignoring White’s extension to play on the right inside seemed like the correct move.

Monday Go Meditation: Game 62 - BenGoZen


Input: [no] 2 [Category] Attack and Defense [Bad] Move 80 — Letting White attack my group like this was very painful. It could have been awful if White had continued his attack. [Good]

Output: Move 111 — Ignoring White to defend my group was an important step to giving me a chance to make a comeback.

Monday Go Meditation: Game 62 - BenGoZen


Input: [no] 3 [Category] Shape [Bad] Move 48 — Letting White get this shape point was unbelievably painful. [Good]

Output: Move 147 — Being able to find this point in the midst of near death was another proud moment for me.

Monday Go Meditation: Game 62 - BenGoZen


Input: [no] 4 [Category] Strategy [Bad] Move 47 — Trying to take the corner instead of expanding my moyo was a pretty big mistake. [Good]

Output: Move 115 — Ignoring White’s approach on my corner to try and reverse the game was importantly to try and reverse the game.

Monday Go Meditation: Game 62 - BenGoZen


Input: [no] 5 [Category] Overall Reading [Bad] Move 63 — This was so painfully obvious to my opponent. Should have saved it for later. [Good]

Output: Move 151 — Being able to read out this attachment almost instantly was a proud moment for me.

Monday Go Meditation: Game 62 - BenGoZen


Input: [no] 6 [Category] Endgame [Bad] Move 86 — Seeing White fly into my area like that was so painful. It nearly ended the game. [Good]

Output: Move 161 — Taking my sente to connect here is probably what eventually pushed my opponent to resign later.

Monday Go Meditation: Game 62 - BenGoZen


Input: [Point spread] Packers by 21/2 [Straight up] Packers [vs. spread] Packers [Game]

Output: Steelers at Packers


Input: [Point spread] Dolphins by 3 [Straight up] Dolphins [vs. spread] Dolphins [Game]

Output: Dolphins at Bills


Input: [Point spread] Panthers by 3 [Straight up] Panthers [vs. spread] Saints [Game]

Output: Saints at Panthers


Input: [Point spread] Bengals by 8 [Straight up] Bengals [vs. spread] Vikings [Game]

Output: Vikings at Bengals


Input: [Point spread] Broncos by 10 [Straight up] Broncos [vs. spread] Broncos [Game]

Output: Broncos at Texans


Input: [Point spread] Titans by 51/2 [Straight up] Titans [vs. spread] Titans [Game]

Output: Titans at Jaguars


Input: [Point spread] Chiefs by 7 [Straight up] Chiefs [vs. spread] Chiefs [Game]

Output: Colts at Chiefs


Input: [Point spread] Jets by 2 [Straight up] Jets [vs. spread] Jets [Game]

Output: Browns at Jets


Input: [Point spread] Rams by 41/2 [Straight up] Rams [vs. spread] Buccaneers [Game]

Output: Buccaneers at Rams


Input: [Point spread] Cowboys by 3 [Straight up] Washington [vs. spread] Washington [Game]

Output: Cowboys at Washington


Input: [Point spread] Lions by 10 [Straight up] Lions [vs. spread] Giants [Game]

Output: Giants at Lions


Input: [Point spread] Seahawks by 10 [Straight up] Seahawks [vs. spread] Cardinals [Game]

Output: Cardinals at Seahawks


Input: [Point spread] Chargers by 10 [Straight up] Chargers [vs. spread] Chargers [Game]

Output: Raiders at Chargers


Input: [Point spread] Ravens by 2 [Straight up] Patriots [vs. spread] Patriots [Game]

Output: Patriots at Ravens


Input: [Point spread] Eagles by 3 [Straight up] Eagles [vs. spread] Eagles [Game]

Output: Bears at Eagles


Input: [Point spread] 49ers by 14 [Straight up] 49ers [vs. spread] 49ers [Game]

Output: Falcons at 49ers


Input: [Straight up] 9-7 [vs. spread] 10-5-1 [Game]

Output: Last week


Input: [Straight up] 135-88-1 [vs. spread] 101-115-8 [Game]

Output: Season


Input: [Stat] Total YPG [Broncos OFFENSE] 394.5 YPG RANK: 4th [Ravens DEFENSE] 235.8 YPG RANK: 1st [Comments]

Output: The Ravens defense is giving up only half of what the Broncos offense is gaining. Will they meet in the middle at around 300 yards?

Ravens vs. Broncos: A Game of Polar Opposites - The Purple Chaos


Input: [Stat] Rushing YPG [Broncos OFFENSE] 55.0 YPG RANK: 32nd [Ravens DEFENSE] 116.8 YPG RANK: 21st [Comments]

Output: This stat is a little misleading for the Ravens; they have a much tougher defense to run against than what the numbers on paper suggest.

Ravens vs. Broncos: A Game of Polar Opposites - The Purple Chaos


Input: [Stat] Passing YPG [Broncos OFFENSE] 339.5 YPG RANK: 1st [Ravens DEFENSE] 119.0 YPG RANK: 1st [Comments]

Output: This is what everyone will be watching this weekend. The Ravens just aren’t allowing passes to be thrown, while the Broncos are throwing at will.

Ravens vs. Broncos: A Game of Polar Opposites - The Purple Chaos


Input: [Stat] 1st Downs Per Game [Broncos OFFENSE] 22.2 RANK: 7th [Ravens DEFENSE] 13.0 RANK: 1st [Comments]

Output: Keeping the # of 1st downs in this game should be a priority for the Ravens to prevent Orton from driving down the field, which he’s had success at.

Ravens vs. Broncos: A Game of Polar Opposites - The Purple Chaos


Input: [Stat] 3rd Down % [Broncos OFFENSE] 42% RANK: 12th [Ravens DEFENSE] 24% RANK: 1st [Comments]

Output: 3rd down conversions are one of the most important aspects of the game. How will the Broncos find a way to convert when the Ravens force so many 3-and-outs?

Ravens vs. Broncos: A Game of Polar Opposites - The Purple Chaos


Input: [Stat] 4th Down % [Broncos OFFENSE] 22% RANK: 17th [Ravens DEFENSE] 0% RANK: 1st [Comments]

Output: The Broncos have made the 2nd most 4th down attempts in the league, but they only converted 3 of the 8 they tried. The Ravens stopped a 4th down attempt already, so keep an eye out if the Broncos go for it on 4th and short.

Ravens vs. Broncos: A Game of Polar Opposites - The Purple Chaos


Input: [Stat] Time of Possession [Broncos OFFENSE] 33:17 RANK: 4th [Ravens DEFENSE] 28:46 RANK: 10th [Comments]

Output: The Broncos control the clock well, but without a proper run game this weekend, how do they plan to burn the clock and wear out the Ravens D?

Ravens vs. Broncos: A Game of Polar Opposites - The Purple Chaos


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 34(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis

Event Schedule for Table Tennis events on the 20060317


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 34(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 34(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 35(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 35(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 35(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 36(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 36(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 36(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 36(4) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 37(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 37(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 37(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 38(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 38(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 38(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 39(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 39(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 39(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 40(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 40(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 40(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 41(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 41(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 41(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 42(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 42(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 42(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 42(4) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 09:30 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 42(5) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 43(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 43(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 43(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 44(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 44(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 44(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 45(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 45(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool D Match 45(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 11(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 11(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 11(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 11(4) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 12(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 12(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 12(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool B Match 12(4) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 13(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 13(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 13(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 13(4) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 14(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 14(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 14(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 11:10 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool C Match 14(4) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Women's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 12:50 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 46(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 12:50 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 46(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 12:50 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 46(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 12:50 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 47(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 12:50 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 47(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 12:50 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 47(3) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 12:50 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 48(1) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis


Input: [Time] 12:50 [Venue] Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre [Event Item] Preliminary Round Pool A Match 48(2) [Start List] Start List [Result] Results [Status] Complete [Event Name]

Output: Men's Team

M2006 > Schedule and Results > Table Tennis