human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge groups authors who co-authored the same paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "Checking Linearizability of Encapsulated Extended Operations"):
  Abstract: Linearizable objects data-structures provide operations that appear to execute atomically. Modern mainstream languages provide many linearizable data-structures, simplifying concurrent programming. In practice, however, programmers often find a need to execute a sequence of operations on linearizable objects that executes atomically and write extended operations for this purpose. Such extended operations are a common source of atomicity bugs.

This paper focuses on the problem of verifying that a set of extension operations to a linearizable library are themselves linearizable. We present several reduction theorems that simplify this verification problem enabling more efficient verification.

We first introduce the notion of an encapsulated extension: this is an extension that a does not introduce new shared state beyond the shared state in the base linearizable library, and b accesses or modifies the shared state only through the base operations. We show that encapsulated extensions are widely prevalent in real applications.

We show that linearizability of encapsulated extended operations can be verified by considering only histories with one occurrence of an extended operation, interleaved with atomic occurrences of base and extended operations. As a consequence, this verification needs to consider only histories with two threads, whereas general linearizability verification requires considering histories with an unbounded number of threads.

We show that when the operations satisfy certain properties, each extended operation can be verified independently of the others, enabling further reductions.

We have implemented a simple static analysis algorithm that conservatively verifies linearizabilty of encapsulated extensions of Java concurrent maps. We present empirical results illustrating the benefits of the reduction theorems.

Includes members:
  Member "Line-up: a complete and automatic linearizability checker":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "CheckFence: checking consistency of concurrent data types on relaxed memory models")

Question: Please tell me which research area the co-authored paper (i.e., the source paper of the center hyperedge) belongs to. The 4 classes are: Computer science, Mathematics, Engineering, Economics, Psychology, Business. Directly output the class name.

gpt: Computer science