human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent groups of papers sharing a common citing paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "Learning Decision Trees from Decision Rules:"
  Abstract: A method and initial results from a comparative study ABSTRACT A standard approach to determining decision trees is to learn them from examples. A disadvantage of this approach is that once a decision tree is learned, it is difficult to modify it to suit different decision making situations. Such problems arise, for example, when an attribute assigned to some node cannot be measured, or there is a significant change in the costs of measuring attributes or in the frequency distribution of events from different decision classes. An attractive approach to resolving this problem is to learn and store knowledge in the form of decision rules, and to generate from them, whenever needed, a decision tree that is most suitable in a given situation. An additional advantage of such an approach is that it facilitates building compact decision trees , which can be much simpler than the logically equivalent conventional decision trees (by compact trees are meant decision trees that may contain branches assigned a set of values , and nodes assigned derived attributes, i.e., attributes that are logical or mathematical functions of the original ones). The paper describes an efficient method, AQDT-1, that takes decision rules generated by an AQ-type learning system (AQ15 or AQ17), and builds from them a decision tree optimizing a given optimality criterion. The method can work in two modes: the standard mode , which produces conventional decision trees, and compact mode, which produces compact decision trees. The preliminary experiments with AQDT-1 have shown that the decision trees generated by it from decision rules (conventional and compact) have outperformed those generated from examples by the well-known C4.5 program both in terms of their simplicity and their predictive accuracy.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "Mingers, 1989 J. Mingers. An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Machine"):
  with members:
    - "Pessimistic decision tree pruning based on tree size"
    - "Multivariate Decision Trees"
    - "Dynamic Automatic Model Selection"
    - "Finding new rules for incomplete theories: Explicit biases for induction with contextual information. In Proceedings"
    - "Induction of Oblique Decision Trees"
    - "Data Analyses Using Simulated Breeding and Inductive Learning Methods"
    - "The Estimation of Probabilities in Attribute Selection Measures for Decision Tree Induction"
    - "Learning Classification Trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "The Estimation of Probabilities in Attribute Selection Measures for Decision Tree Induction"):
  with members:
    - "Mingers, 1989 J. Mingers. An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Machine"
    - "LEARNING FOR DECISION MAKING: The FRD Approach and a Comparative Study  Machine Learning and Inference Laboratory"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 7 classes are: Neural_Networks, Reinforcement_Learning, Probabilistic_Methods, Theory, Genetic_Algorithms, Case_Based, Rule_Learning. Directly output the class name.

gpt: Rule_Learning