human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent groups of papers sharing a common citing paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "Surgery"
  Abstract: Object localization has applications in many areas of engineering and science. The goal is to spatially locate an arbitrarily-shaped object. In many applications, it is desirable to minimize the number of measurements collected for this purpose, while ensuring sufficient localization accuracy. In surgery, for example, collecting a large number of localization measurements may either extend the time required to perform a surgical procedure, or increase the radiation dosage to which a patient is exposed. Localization accuracy is a function of the spatial distribution of discrete measurements over an object when measurement noise is present. In [Simon et al., 1995a], metrics were presented to evaluate the information available from a set of discrete object measurements. In this study, new approaches to the discrete point data selection problem are described. These include hillclimbing, genetic algorithms (GAs), and Population-Based Incremental Learning (PBIL). Extensions of the standard GA and PBIL methods, which employ multiple parallel populations, are explored. The results of extensive empirical testing are provided. The results suggest that a combination of PBIL and hillclimbing result in the best overall performance. A computer-assisted surgical system which incorporates some of the methods presented in this paper is currently being evaluated in cadaver trials. Evolution-Based Methods for Selecting Point Data Shumeet Baluja was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Student Fellowship and a Graduate Student Fellowship from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, administered by the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX. David Simon was partially supported by a National Science Foundation National Challenge grant (award IRI-9422734). for Object Localization: Applications to

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "4 Implementing Application Specific Routines  Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley."):
  with members:
    - "Measuring the Difficulty of Specific Learning Problems"
    - "Trading Spaces: Computation, Representation and the Limits of Uninformed Learning"
    - "Discovering Complex Othello Strategies Through Evolutionary Neural Networks"
    - "USING MARKER-BASED GENETIC ENCODING OF NEURAL NETWORKS TO EVOLVE FINITE-STATE BEHAVIOUR"
    - "Evolving Obstacle Avoidance Behavior in a Robot Arm"
    - "A Comparison of Selection Schemes used in Genetic Algorithms"
    - "Determining Successful Negotiation Strategies: An Evolutionary Approach"
    - "Genetic Programming and Redundancy"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "Distribution Category:  A Parallel Genetic Algorithm for the Set Partitioning Problem"):
  with members:
    - "4 Implementing Application Specific Routines  Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley."
    - "A Comparative Study of Genetic Search"
    - "A Survey of Parallel Genetic Algorithms"
    - "Scheduling Maintenance of Electrical Power Transmission Networks Using Genetic Programming"
    - "Genetic Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization: The Assembly Line Balancing Problem"
    - "An Analysis of the Interacting Roles of Population Size and Crossover in Genetic Algorithms"
    - "On the Virtues of Parameterized Uniform Crossover"
    - "As mentioned in the introduction, an encod-ing/crossover pair makes a spectrum of geographical linkages. A"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "Stochastic Hillclimbing as a Baseline Method for Evaluating Genetic Algorithms"):
  with members:
    - "4 Implementing Application Specific Routines  Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley."
    - "An Evolutionary Approach to Combinatorial Optimization Problems"
    - "Chapter 4 Empirical comparison of stochastic algorithms Empirical comparison of stochastic algorithms in a graph"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "Book Review  Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation Reviewed by: 2"):
  with members:
    - "Representing and Learning Visual Schemas in Neural Networks for Scene Analysis"
    - "Convergence-Zone Episodic Memory: Analysis and Simulations"
    - "Topography And Ocular Dominance: A Model Exploring Positive Correlations"
    - "Mean Field Theory for Sigmoid Belief Networks"
    - "Dyslexic and Category-Specific Aphasic Impairments in a Self-Organizing Feature Map Model of the Lexicon"
    - "Neural Networks and Statistical Models Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference,"
    - "Boltzmann Machine learning using mean field theory and linear response correction"
    - "Induction of Multiscale Temporal Structure"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 7 classes are: Neural_Networks, Reinforcement_Learning, Probabilistic_Methods, Theory, Genetic_Algorithms, Case_Based, Rule_Learning. Directly output the class name.

gpt: Genetic_Algorithms