human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent groups of papers sharing a common citing paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "An Optimized Theory Revision Module"
  Abstract: Theory revision systems typically use a set of theory-to-theory transformations f k g to hill-climb from a given initial theory to a new theory whose empirical accuracy, over a given set of labeled training instances fc j g, is a local maximum. At the heart of each such process is an "evaluator", which compares the accuracy of the current theory KB with that of each of its "neighbors" f k (KB)g, with the goal of determining which neighbor has the highest accuracy. The obvious "wrapper" evaluator simply evaluates each individual neighbor theory KB k = k (KB) on each instance c j . As it can be very expensive to evaluate a single theory on a single instance, and there can be a great many training instances and a huge number of neighbors, this approach can be prohibitively slow. We present an alternative system which employs a smarter evaluator that quickly computes the accuracy of a transformed theory k (KB) by "looking inside" KB and reasoning about the effects of the k transformation. We compare the performance of with the naive wrapper system on real-world theories obtained from a fielded expert system, and find that runs over 35 times faster than , while attaining the same accuracy. This paper also discusses 's source of power. Keywords: theory revision, efficient algorithm, hill-climbing system Multiple Submissions: We have submited a related version of this paper to AAAI96. fl We gratefully acknowledge the many helpful comments on this report from George Drastal, Chandra Mouleeswaran and Geoff Towell.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "Theory Revision in Fault Hierarchies"):
  with members:
    - "Irrelevant Features and the Subset Selection Problem"
    - "Cost-Sensitive Classification: Empirical Evaluation of a Hybrid Genetic Decision Tree Induction Algorithm"
    - "The Challenge of Revising an Impure Theory"
    - "An Improved Algorithm for Incremental Induction of Decision Trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "Theory Refinement Combining Analytical and Empirical Methods"):
  with members:
    - "The Challenge of Revising an Impure Theory"
    - "Learning Analytically and Inductively"
    - "Finding Accurate Frontiers: A Knowledge-Intensive Approach to Relational Learning"
    - "From Theory Refinement to KB Maintenance: a Position Statement"
    - "Tractability of Theory Patching"
    - "Revising Bayesian Network Parameters Using Backpropagation"
    - "Combining Connectionist and Symbolic Learning to Refine Certainty-Factor Rule Bases"
    - "Extending Theory Refinement to M-of-N Rules"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "Irrelevant Features and the Subset Selection Problem"):
  with members:
    - "Theory Revision in Fault Hierarchies"
    - "Expectation-Based Selective Attention for Visual Monitoring and Control of a Robot Vehicle"
    - "Feature Subset Selection as Search with Probabilistic Estimates"
    - "NP-Completeness of Searches for Smallest Possible Feature Sets a subset of the set of all"
    - "Cost-sensitive feature reduction applied to a hybrid genetic algorithm"
    - "Prototype and Feature Selection by Sampling and Random Mutation Hill Climbing Algorithms"
    - "Machine Learning Methods for International Conflict Databases: A Case Study in Predicting Mediation Outcome"
    - "The Effective Size of a Neural Network: A Principal Component Approach"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "The Complexity of Theory Revision"):
  with members:
    - "The Challenge of Revising an Impure Theory"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 7 classes are: Neural_Networks, Reinforcement_Learning, Probabilistic_Methods, Theory, Genetic_Algorithms, Case_Based, Rule_Learning. Directly output the class name.

gpt: Theory