human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "fair algorithms for learning in allocation problems"
  Abstract: Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a resource (loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (loans given that are repaid or criminals that are apprehended). Often in such problems fairness is also a concern. A natural notion of fairness, based on general principles of equality of opportunity, asks that conditional on an individual being a candidate for the resource, the probability of actually receiving it is approximately independent of the individual's group. In lending this means that equally creditworthy individuals in different racial groups have roughly equal chances of receiving a loan. In policing it means that two individuals committing the same crime in different districts would have roughly equal chances of being arrested. #R##N#We formalize this fairness notion for allocation problems and investigate its algorithmic consequences. Our main technical results include an efficient learning algorithm that converges to an optimal fair allocation even when the frequency of candidates (creditworthy individuals or criminals) in each group is unknown. The algorithm operates in a censored feedback model in which only the number of candidates who received the resource in a given allocation can be observed, rather than the true number of candidates. This models the fact that we do not learn the creditworthiness of individuals we do not give loans to nor learn about crimes committed if the police presence in a district is low. #R##N#As an application of our framework, we consider the predictive policing problem. The learning algorithm is trained on arrest data gathered from its own deployments on previous days, resulting in a potential feedback loop that our algorithm provably overcomes. We empirically investigate the performance of our algorithm on the Philadelphia Crime Incidents dataset.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness"):
  with members:
    - "on measuring social biases in sentence encoders"
    - "fairface face attribute dataset for balanced race gender and age"
    - "fair regression quantitative definitions and reduction based algorithms"
    - "putting fairness principles into practice challenges metrics and improvements"
    - "generative adversarial networks for mitigating biases in machine learning systems"
    - "improved adversarial learning for fair classification"
    - "compositional fairness constraints for graph embeddings"
    - "mathematical notions vs human perception of fairness a descriptive approach to fairness for machine learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "fair correlation clustering"):
  with members:
    - "coresets for clustering with fairness constraints"
    - "summarizing user generated textual content motivation and methods for fairness in algorithmic summaries"
    - "improved algorithms for correlation clustering with local objectives"
    - "near neighbor who is the fairest of them all"
    - "correlation clustering with adaptive similarity queries"
    - "fair algorithms for clustering"
    - "scalable fair clustering"
    - "achieving fairness in determining medicaid eligibility through fairgroup construction"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "individual fairness for k clustering"):
  with members:
    - "coresets for clustering with fairness constraints"
    - "r enyi fair inference"
    - "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"
    - "fairness in clustering with multiple sensitive attributes"
    - "a center in your neighborhood fairness in facility location"
    - "scalable fair clustering"
    - "clustering without over representation"
    - "performance of johnson lindenstrauss transform for k means and k medians clustering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "balancing competing objectives with noisy data score based classifiers for welfare aware machine learning"):
  with members:
    - "a longitudinal analysis of youtube s promotion of conspiracy videos"
    - "the disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally"
    - "fairness and utilization in allocating resources with uncertain demand"
    - "fair classification and social welfare"
    - "noise tolerant fair classification"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "welfare and distributional impacts of fair classification"
    - "a flexible framework for multi objective bayesian optimization using random scalarizations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "near neighbor who is the fairest of them all"):
  with members:
    - "fair algorithms for clustering"
    - "scalable fair clustering"
    - "independent range sampling revisited again"
    - "fair near neighbor search independent range sampling in high dimensions"
    - "convex formulations for fair principal component analysis"
    - "fair clustering through fairlets"
    - "a reductions approach to fair classification"
    - "ann benchmarks a benchmarking tool for approximate nearest neighbor algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "fair allocation through selective information acquisition"):
  with members:
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "the measure and mismeasure of fairness a critical review of fair machine learning"
    - "datasheets for datasets"
    - "word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes"
    - "active fairness in algorithmic decision making"
    - "algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness"
    - "semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human like biases"
    - "equality of opportunity in supervised learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "fairness with dynamics"):
  with members:
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "verifiable reinforcement learning via policy extraction"
    - "constrained policy optimization"
    - "fairness in reinforcement learning"
    - "fairness in learning classic and contextual bandits"
    - "equality of opportunity in supervised learning"
    - "fairness through awareness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "fairness and utilization in allocating resources with uncertain demand"):
  with members:
    - "runaway feedback loops in predictive policing"
    - "censored exploration and the dark pool problem"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)