human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "differentially private double spectrum auction with approximate social welfare maximization"
  Abstract: Spectrum auction is an effective approach to improving spectrum utilization, by leasing idle spectrum from primary users to secondary users. Recently, a few differentially private spectrum auction mechanisms have been proposed, but, as far as we know, none of them addressed the differential privacy in the setting of double spectrum auctions. In this paper, we combine the concept of differential privacy with double spectrum auction design, and present a Differentially private Double spectrum auction mechanism with approximate Social welfare Maximization (DDSM). Specifically, we design the mechanism by employing the exponential mechanism to select clearing prices for the double spectrum auction with probabilities exponentially proportional to the related social welfare values, and then improve the mechanism in several aspects like the designs of the auction algorithm, the utility function and the buyer grouping algorithm. Through theoretical analysis, we prove that DDSM achieves differential privacy, approximate truthfulness, approximate social welfare maximization. Extensive experimental evaluations show that DDSM achieves a good performance in term of social welfare.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "differentially private call auctions and market impact"):
  with members:
    - "strategic classification from revealed preferences"
    - "private matchings and allocations"
    - "jointly private convex programming"
    - "inducing approximately optimal flow using truthful mediators"
    - "approximately stable school optimal and student truthful many to one matchings via differential privacy"
    - "privacy and truthful equilibrium selection for aggregative games"
    - "asymptotically truthful equilibrium selection in large congestion games"
    - "mechanism design in large games incentives and privacy"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "differentially private combinatorial cloud auction"):
  with members:
    - "auction mechanisms in cloud fog computing resource allocation for public blockchain networks"
    - "dominant resource fairness in cloud computing systems with heterogeneous servers"
    - "differentially private combinatorial optimization"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)