human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "faster data access in large scale systems network scale latency analysis under general service time distributions"
  Abstract: In cloud storage systems with a large number of servers, files are typically not stored in single servers. Instead, they are split, replicated (to ensure reliability in case of server malfunction) and stored in different servers. We analyze the mean latency of such a split-and-replicate cloud storage system under general sub-exponential service time. We present a novel scheduling scheme that utilizes the load-balancing policy of the \textit{power of $d$ $(\geq 2)$} choices. An alternative to split-and-replicate is to use erasure-codes, and recently, it has been observed that they can reduce latency in data access (see \cite{longbo_delay} for details). We argue that under high redundancy (integer redundancy factor strictly greater than or equal to 2) regime, the mean latency of a coded system is upper bounded by that of a split-and-replicate system (with same replication factor) and the gap between these two is small. We validate this claim numerically under different service distributions such as exponential, shift plus exponential and the heavy-tailed Weibull distribution and compare the mean latency to that of an unsplit-replicated system. We observe that the coded system outperforms the unsplit-replication system by at least $20\%$. Furthermore, we consider the mean latency for an erasure coded system with low redundancy (fractional redundancy factor between 1 and 2), a scenario which is more pragmatic, given the storage constraints (\cite{rashmi_thesis}). However under this regime, we restrict ourselves to the special case of exponential service time distribution and use the randomized load balancing policy namely \textit{batch-sampling}. We obtain an upper bound on mean delay that depends on the order statistics of the queue lengths, which, we further smooth out via a discrete to continuous approximation.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)