human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "subexponential algorithms for variants of homomorphism problem in string graphs"
  Abstract: We consider the complexity of finding weighted homomorphisms from intersection graphs of curves (string graphs) with $n$ vertices to a fixed graph $H$. We provide a complete dichotomy for the problem: if $H$ has no two vertices sharing two common neighbors, then the problem can be solved in time $2^{O(n^{2/3} \log n)}$, otherwise there is no algorithm working in time $2^{o(n)}$, even in intersection graphs of segments, unless the ETH fails. This generalizes several known results concerning the complexity of computatational problems in geometric intersection graphs. Then we consider two variants of graph homomorphism problem, called locally injective homomorphism and locally bijective homomorphism, where we require the homomorphism to be injective or bijective on the neighborhood of each vertex. We show that for each target graph $H$, both problems can always be solved in time $2^{O(\sqrt{n} \log n)}$ in string graphs. For the locally surjecive homomorphism, defined in an analogous way, the situation seems more complicated. We show the dichotomy theorem for simple connected graphs $H$ with maximum degree 2. If $H$ is isomorphic to $P_3$ or $C_4$, then the existence of a locally surjective homomorphism from a string graph with $n$ vertices to $H$ can be decided in time $2^{O(n^{2/3} \log^{3/2} n)}$, otherwise the problem cannot be solved in time $2^{o(n)}$, unless the ETH fails. As a byproduct, we obtain several results concerning the complexity of variants of homomorphism problem in $P_t$-free graphs. In particular, we obtain the dichotomy theorem for weighted homomorphism, analogous to the one for string graphs.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on cycle transversals and their connected variants in the absence of a small linear forest"):
  with members:
    - "connected vertex cover for sp_1 p_5 free graphs"
    - "minimum connected transversals in graphs new hardness results and tractable cases using the price of connectivity"
    - "polynomial time algorithm for maximum weight independent set on p_6 free graphs"
    - "independent feedback vertex set for p_5 free graphs"
    - "the price of connectivity for vertex cover"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)