human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "two party distribution testing communication and security"
  Abstract: We study the problem of discrete distribution testing in the two-party setting. For example, in the standard closeness testing problem, Alice and Bob each have $t$ samples from, respectively, distributions $a$ and $b$ over $[n]$, and they need to test whether $a=b$ or $a,b$ are $\epsilon$-far for some fixed $\epsilon>0$. This is in contrast to the well-studied one-party case, where the tester has unrestricted access to samples of both distributions, for which optimal bounds are known for a number of variations. Despite being a natural constraint in applications, the two-party setting has evaded attention so far. #R##N#We address two fundamental aspects: 1) what is the communication complexity, and 2) can it be accomplished securely, without Alice and Bob learning extra information about each other's input. Besides closeness testing, we also study the independence testing problem, where Alice and Bob have $t$ samples from distributions $a$ and $b$ respectively, which may be correlated; the question is whether $a,b$ are independent of $\epsilon$-far from being independent. #R##N#Our contribution is three-fold: #R##N#1) Communication: we show how to gain communication efficiency with more samples, beyond the information-theoretic bound on $t$. The gain is polynomially better than what one obtains by adapting standard algorithms. #R##N#2) Lower bounds: we prove tightness of our protocols for the closeness testing, and for the independence testing when the number of samples is unbounded. These lower bounds are of independent interest as these are the first 2-party communication lower bounds for testing problems. #R##N#3) Security: we define secure distribution testing and argue that it must leak at least some minimal information. We then provide secure versions of the above protocols with an overhead that is only polynomial in the security parameter.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "communication and memory efficient testing of discrete distributions"):
  with members:
    - "geometric lower bounds for distributed parameter estimation under communication constraints"
    - "inference under information constraints i lower bounds from chi square contraction"
    - "near optimal closeness testing of discrete histogram distributions"
    - "sample optimal identity testing with high probability"
    - "sharp bounds for generalized uniformity testing"
    - "generalized uniformity testing"
    - "testing conditional independence of discrete distributions"
    - "a new approach for testing properties of discrete distributions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "inference under information constraints i lower bounds from chi square contraction"):
  with members:
    - "inference under information constraints ii communication constraints and shared randomness"
    - "geometric lower bounds for distributed parameter estimation under communication constraints"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"
    - "test without trust optimal locally private distribution testing"
    - "locally private hypothesis testing"
    - "optimal schemes for discrete distribution estimation under locally differential privacy"
    - "a general characterization of the statistical query complexity"
    - "mutual information optimally local private discrete distribution estimation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)