human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "safely entering the deep a review of verification and validation for machine learning and a challenge elicitation in the automotive industry"
  Abstract: Deep Neural Networks (DNN) will emerge as a cornerstone in automotive software engineering. However, developing systems with DNNs introduces novel challenges for safety assessments. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art in verification and validation of safety-critical systems that rely on machine learning. Furthermore, we report from a workshop series on DNNs for perception with automotive experts in Sweden, confirming that ISO 26262 largely contravenes the nature of DNNs. We recommend aerospace-to-automotive knowledge transfer and systems-based safety approaches, e.g., safety cage architectures and simulated system test cases.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing"):
  with members:
    - "input prioritization for testing neural networks"
    - "deepfault fault localization for deep neural networks"
    - "machine learning testing survey landscapes and horizons"
    - "formal security analysis of neural networks using symbolic intervals"
    - "symbolic execution for deep neural networks"
    - "deepgauge multi granularity testing criteria for deep learning systems"
    - "deepmutation mutation testing of deep learning systems"
    - "concolic testing for deep neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "training adversarial agents to exploit weaknesses in deep control policies"):
  with members:
    - "exploring the limitations of behavior cloning for autonomous driving"
    - "adaptive stress testing for autonomous vehicles"
    - "a survey of deep learning applications to autonomous vehicle control"
    - "training for faster adversarial robustness verification via inducing relu stability"
    - "adversarially robust generalization requires more data"
    - "making sense of vision and touch self supervised learning of multimodal representations for contact rich tasks"
    - "adversarial reinforcement learning framework for benchmarking collision avoidance mechanisms in autonomous vehicles"
    - "reward estimation for variance reduction in deep reinforcement learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "flexible and context specific ai explainability a multidisciplinary approach"):
  with members:
    - "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization"
    - "functional transparency for structured data a game theoretic approach"
    - "towards robust locally linear deep networks"
    - "explaining a black box by using a deep variational information bottleneck approach"
    - "learning a sat solver from single bit supervision"
    - "contextual explanation networks"
    - "smoothgrad removing noise by adding noise"
    - "a causal framework for explaining the predictions of black box sequence to sequence models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "towards structured evaluation of deep neural network supervisors"):
  with members:
    - "metamorphic testing a new approach for generating next test cases"
    - "deepgauge multi granularity testing criteria for deep learning systems"
    - "guiding deep learning system testing using surprise adequacy"
    - "dlfuzz differential fuzzing testing of deep learning systems"
    - "deeproad gan based metamorphic autonomous driving system testing"
    - "on calibration of modern neural networks"
    - "deepxplore automated whitebox testing of deep learning systems"
    - "an analysis of iso 26262 using machine learning safely in automotive software"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "requirements engineering for machine learning perspectives from data scientists"):
  with members:
    - "ten ways to fool the masses with machine learning"
    - "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)