human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "built in vulnerabilities to imperceptible adversarial perturbations"
  Abstract: Designing models that are robust to small adversarial perturbations of their inputs has proven remarkably difficult. In this work we show that the reverse problem---making models more vulnerable---is surprisingly easy. After presenting some proofs of concept on MNIST, we introduce a generic tilting attack that injects vulnerabilities into the linear layers of pre-trained networks without affecting their performance on natural data. We illustrate this attack on a multilayer perceptron trained on SVHN and use it to design a stand-alone adversarial module which we call a steganogram decoder. Finally, we show on CIFAR-10 that a state-of-the-art network can be trained to misclassify images in the presence of imperceptible backdoor signals. These different results suggest that adversarial perturbations are not always informative of the true features used by a model.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "investigating generalization in neural networks under optimally evolved training perturbations"):
  with members:
    - "adaptive gradient methods with dynamic bound of learning rate"
    - "excessive invariance causes adversarial vulnerability"
    - "recurrent world models facilitate policy evolution"
    - "certified defenses for data poisoning attacks"
    - "sharp minima can generalize for deep nets"
    - "improving generalization performance by switching from adam to sgd"
    - "towards poisoning of deep learning algorithms with back gradient optimization"
    - "understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "feature prioritization and regularization improve standard accuracy and adversarial robustness"):
  with members:
    - "training verified learners with learned verifiers"
    - "adversarial logit pairing"
    - "defense gan protecting classifiers against adversarial attacks using generative models"
    - "on the robustness of the cvpr 2018 white box adversarial example defenses"
    - "improving the generalization of adversarial training with domain adaptation"
    - "learn to pay attention"
    - "obfuscated gradients give a false sense of security circumventing defenses to adversarial examples"
    - "threat of adversarial attacks on deep learning in computer vision a survey"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)