human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "selection problems in the presence of implicit bias"
  Abstract: Over the past two decades, the notion of implicit bias has come to serve as an important component in our understanding of discrimination in activities such as hiring, promotion, and school admissions. Research on implicit bias posits that when people evaluate others -- for example, in a hiring context -- their unconscious biases about membership in particular groups can have an effect on their decision-making, even when they have no deliberate intention to discriminate against members of these groups. A growing body of experimental work has pointed to the effect that implicit bias can have in producing adverse outcomes. #R##N#Here we propose a theoretical model for studying the effects of implicit bias on selection decisions, and a way of analyzing possible procedural remedies for implicit bias within this model. A canonical situation represented by our model is a hiring setting: a recruiting committee is trying to choose a set of finalists to interview among the applicants for a job, evaluating these applicants based on their future potential, but their estimates of potential are skewed by implicit bias against members of one group. In this model, we show that measures such as the Rooney Rule, a requirement that at least one of the finalists be chosen from the affected group, can not only improve the representation of this affected group, but also lead to higher payoffs in absolute terms for the organization performing the recruiting. However, identifying the conditions under which such measures can lead to improved payoffs involves subtle trade-offs between the extent of the bias and the underlying distribution of applicant characteristics, leading to novel theoretical questions about order statistics in the presence of probabilistic side information.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fairness in recommendation ranking through pairwise comparisons"):
  with members:
    - "putting fairness principles into practice challenges metrics and improvements"
    - "nuanced metrics for measuring unintended bias with real data for text classification"
    - "estimating position bias without intrusive interventions"
    - "policy learning for fairness in ranking"
    - "equity of attention amortizing individual fairness in rankings"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "top k off policy correction for a reinforce recommender system"
    - "learning adversarially fair and transferable representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "summarizing user generated textual content motivation and methods for fairness in algorithmic summaries"):
  with members:
    - "discrimination in the age of algorithms"
    - "fair and diverse dpp based data summarization"
    - "equity of attention amortizing individual fairness in rankings"
    - "simplicity creates inequity implications for fairness stereotypes and interpretability"
    - "fair clustering through fairlets"
    - "equality of voice towards fair representation in crowdsourced top k recommendations"
    - "a survey on neural network based summarization methods"
    - "text summarization techniques a brief survey"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "recovering from biased data can fairness constraints improve accuracy"):
  with members:
    - "identifying and correcting label bias in machine learning"
    - "discriminative but not discriminatory a comparison of fairness definitions under different worldviews"
    - "learning under selective labels in the presence of expert consistency"
    - "on fairness and calibration"
    - "algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness"
    - "equality of opportunity in supervised learning"
    - "on the im possibility of fairness"
    - "inherent trade offs in the fair determination of risk scores"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the frontiers of fairness in machine learning"):
  with members:
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "downstream effects of affirmative action"
    - "a smoothed analysis of the greedy algorithm for the linear contextual bandit problem"
    - "a short term intervention for long term fairness in the labor market"
    - "multiaccuracy black box post processing for fairness in classification"
    - "online learning with an unknown fairness metric"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "learning adversarially fair and transferable representations"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CY(Computers and Society)