human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "blameworthiness in strategic games"
  Abstract: There are multiple notions of coalitional responsibility. The focus of this paper is on the blameworthiness defined through the principle of alternative possibilities: a coalition is blamable for a statement if the statement is true, but the coalition had a strategy to prevent it. The main technical result is a sound and complete bimodal logical system that describes properties of blameworthiness in one-shot games.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "duty to warn in strategic games"):
  with members:
    - "strategically knowing how"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the limits of morality in strategic games"):
  with members:
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "blameworthiness in games with imperfect information"):
  with members:
    - "towards formal definitions of blameworthiness intention and moral responsibility"
    - "strategically knowing how"
    - "coalition and group announcement logic"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"
    - "a logic of knowing how"
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "knowledge and blameworthiness"):
  with members:
    - "strategically knowing how"
    - "coalition and group announcement logic"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"
    - "a logic of knowing how"
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)