human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the sorry state of tls security in enterprise interception appliances"
  Abstract: Network traffic inspection, including TLS traffic, in enterprise environments is widely practiced. Reasons for doing so are primarily related to improving enterprise security (e.g., malware detection) and meeting legal requirements. To analyze TLS-encrypted data, network appliances implement a Man-in-the-Middle TLS proxy, by acting as the intended web server to a requesting client (e.g., a browser), and acting as the client to the outside web server. As such, the TLS proxy must implement both a TLS client and a server, and handle a large amount of traffic, preferably, in real-time. However, as protocol and implementation layer vulnerabilities in TLS/HTTPS are quite frequent, these proxies must be, at least, as secure as a modern, up-to-date web browser, and a properly configured web server. As opposed to client-end TLS proxies (e.g., as in several anti-virus products), the proxies in network appliances may serve hundreds to thousands of clients, and any vulnerability in their TLS implementations can significantly downgrade enterprise security. #R##N#To analyze TLS security of network appliances, we develop a comprehensive framework, by combining and extending tests from existing work on client-end and network-based interception studies. We analyze thirteen representative network appliances over a period of more than a year (including versions before and after notifying affected vendors, a total of 17 versions), and uncover several security issues. For instance, we found that four appliances perform no certificate validation at all, three use pre-generated certificates, and eleven accept certificates signed using MD5, exposing their clients to MITM attacks. Our goal is to highlight the risks introduced by widely-used TLS proxies in enterprise and government environments, potentially affecting many systems hosting security, privacy, and financially sensitive data.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)