human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "approximate exploration through state abstraction"
  Abstract: Although exploration in reinforcement learning is well understood from a theoretical point of view, provably correct methods remain impractical. In this paper we study the interplay between exploration and approximation, what we call approximate exploration. Our main goal is to further our theoretical understanding of pseudo-count based exploration bonuses (Bellemare et al., 2016), a practical exploration scheme based on density modelling. As a warm-up, we quantify the performance of an exploration algorithm, MBIE-EB (Strehl and Littman, 2008), when explicitly combined with state aggregation. This allows us to confirm that, as might be expected, approximation allows the agent to trade off between learning speed and quality of the learned policy. Next, we show how a given density model can be related to an abstraction and that the corresponding pseudo-count bonus can act as a substitute in MBIE-EB combined with this abstraction, but may lead to either under- or over-exploration. Then, we show that a given density model also defines an implicit abstraction, and find a surprising mismatch between pseudo-counts derived either implicitly or explicitly. Finally we derive a new pseudo-count bonus alleviating this issue.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "optimistic exploration even with a pessimistic initialisation"):
  with members:
    - "go explore a new approach for hard exploration problems"
    - "q learning with ucb exploration is sample efficient for infinite horizon mdp"
    - "count based exploration with the successor representation"
    - "exploration by random network distillation"
    - "learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels"
    - "dora the explorer directed outreaching reinforcement action selection"
    - "model based active exploration"
    - "is q learning provably efficient"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)