human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "elasticity detection a building block for delay sensitive congestion control"
  Abstract: This paper develops a technique to detect whether the cross traffic competing with a flow is elastic or not, and shows how to use the elasticity detector to improve congestion control. If the cross traffic is elastic, i.e., made up of buffer-filling flows like Cubic or Reno, then one should use a scheme that competes well with such traffic. Such a scheme will not be able to control delays because the cross traffic will not cooperate. If, however, cross traffic is inelastic, then one can use a suitable delay-sensitive congestion control algorithm, which can control delays, but which would have obtained dismal throughput when run concurrently with a buffer-filling algorithm. #R##N#We use the elasticity detector to demonstrate a congestion control framework that always achieves high utilization, but which can also achieve low delays when cross traffic permits it. The technique uses an asymmetric sinusoidal pulse pattern and estimates elasticity by computing the frequency response (FFT) of the cross traffic estimate; we have measured its accuracy to be over 90%. We have developed Nimbus, a protocol that explicitly switches between TCP-competitive and delay-sensitive modes using the elasticity detector. Our results on emulated and real-world paths show that Nimbus achieves throughput comparable to or better than Cubic always, but with delays that are much lower when cross traffic is inelastic. Unlike BBR, Nimbus is fair to Cubic, and has significantly lower delay in all cases; for example, on real-world paths, Nimbus has 11% lower throughput but at 40-50 ms lower packet delay.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a survey on recent advances in transport layer protocols"):
  with members:
    - "a quic implementation for ns 3"
    - "beyond socket options making the linux tcp stack truly extensible"
    - "low delay scheduling of objects over multiple wireless paths"
    - "datacenter traffic control understanding techniques and tradeoffs"
    - "qaware a cross layer approach to mptcp scheduling"
    - "homa a receiver driven low latency transport protocol using network priorities"
    - "machine learning for networking workflow advances and opportunities"
    - "mptcp meets fec supporting latency sensitive applications over heterogeneous networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)