human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "semi mapreduce meets congested clique"
  Abstract: Graph problems are troublesome when it comes to MapReduce. Typically, to be able to design algorithms that make use of the advantages of MapReduce, assumptions beyond what the model imposes, such as the density of the input graph, are required. #R##N#In a recent shift, a simple and robust model of MapReduce for graph problems, where the space per machine is set to be O(|V|), has attracted considerable attention. We term this model semi-MapReduce, or in short, semiMPC, and focus on its computational power. #R##N#We show through a set of simulation methods that semiMPC is, perhaps surprisingly, equivalent to the congested clique model of distributed computing. However, semiMPC, in addition to round complexity, incorporates another practically important dimension to optimize: the number of machines. Furthermore, we show that algorithms in other distributed computing models, such as CONGEST, can be simulated to run in the same number of rounds of semiMPC while also using an optimal number of machines. We later show the implications of these simulation methods by obtaining improved algorithms for these models using the recent algorithms that have been developed.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "equivalence classes and conditional hardness in massively parallel computations"):
  with members:
    - "walking randomly massively and efficiently"
    - "log diameter rounds algorithms for 2 vertex and 2 edge connectivity"
    - "dynamic algorithms for the massively parallel computation model"
    - "a conditional lower bound on graph connectivity in mapreduce"
    - "efficient circuit simulation in mapreduce"
    - "exponentially faster massively parallel maximal matching"
    - "parallel batch dynamic graphs algorithms and lower bounds"
    - "massively parallel algorithms for finding well connected components in sparse graphs"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)