human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "tight lower bounds for locally differentially private selection"
  Abstract: We prove a tight lower bound (up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol for optimizing a linear function over the simplex. This lower bound also implies a tight lower bound (again, up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol implementing the exponential mechanism. These results reveal that any local protocol for these problems has exponentially worse dependence on the dimension than corresponding algorithms in the central model. Previously, Kasiviswanathan et al. (FOCS 2008) proved an exponential separation between local and central model algorithms for PAC learning the class of parity functions. In contrast, our lower bound are quantitatively tight, apply to a simple and natural class of linear optimization problems, and our techniques are arguably simpler.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection"):
  with members:
    - "private hypothesis selection"
    - "pan private uniformity testing"
    - "sorted top k in rounds"
    - "improved differentially private analysis of variance"
    - "locally private learning without interaction requires separation"
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy through communication complexity"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "private identity testing for high dimensional distributions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"):
  with members:
    - "improved summation from shuffling"
    - "separating local shuffled differential privacy via histograms"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "practical and robust privacy amplification with multi party differential privacy"
    - "communication complexity in locally private distribution estimation and heavy hitters"
    - "private aggregation from fewer anonymous messages"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the power of synergy in differential privacy combining a small curator with local randomizers"):
  with members:
    - "locally private k means clustering"
    - "blender enabling local search with a hybrid differential privacy model"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy through communication complexity"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"):
  with members:
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "learning without interaction requires separation"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "towards instance optimal private query release"
    - "test without trust optimal locally private distribution testing"
    - "locally private gaussian estimation"
    - "inference under information constraints i lower bounds from chi square contraction"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "interaction is necessary for distributed learning with privacy or communication constraints"):
  with members:
    - "inference under information constraints ii communication constraints and shared randomness"
    - "distributed learning with sublinear communication"
    - "locally private learning without interaction requires separation"
    - "estimating smooth glm in non interactive local differential privacy model with public unlabeled data"
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy through communication complexity"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "parallelization does not accelerate convex optimization adaptivity lower bounds for non smooth convex minimization"
    - "learning without interaction requires separation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "private heavy hitters and range queries in the shuffled model"):
  with members:
    - "communication complexity in locally private distribution estimation and heavy hitters"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "answering range queries under local differential privacy"
    - "practical locally private heavy hitters"
    - "marginal release under local differential privacy"
    - "heavy hitters and the structure of local privacy"
    - "prochlo strong privacy for analytics in the crowd"
    - "collecting telemetry data privately"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "aggregating votes with local differential privacy usefulness soundness vs indistinguishability"):
  with members:
    - "collecting and analyzing multidimensional data with local differential privacy"
    - "privacy loss in apple s implementation of differential privacy on macos 10 12"
    - "tight lower bounds for differentially private selection"
    - "marginal release under local differential privacy"
    - "heavy hitters and the structure of local privacy"
    - "collecting telemetry data privately"
    - "collecting and analyzing data from smart device users with local differential privacy"
    - "to drop or not to drop robustness consistency and differential privacy properties of dropout"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "locally private gaussian estimation"):
  with members:
    - "blender enabling local search with a hybrid differential privacy model"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "learning without interaction requires separation"
    - "differentially private hierarchical group size estimation"
    - "privately learning high dimensional distributions"
    - "differentially private hierarchical count of counts histograms"
    - "test without trust optimal locally private distribution testing"
    - "locally private hypothesis testing"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)