human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "how much reading does reading comprehension require a critical investigation of popular benchmarks"
  Abstract: Many recent papers address reading comprehension, where examples consist of (question, passage, answer) tuples. Presumably, a model must combine information from both questions and passages to predict corresponding answers. However, despite intense interest in the topic, with hundreds of published papers vying for leaderboard dominance, basic questions about the difficulty of many popular benchmarks remain unanswered. In this paper, we establish sensible baselines for the bAbI, SQuAD, CBT, CNN, and Who-did-What datasets, finding that question- and passage-only models often perform surprisingly well. On $14$ out of $20$ bAbI tasks, passage-only models achieve greater than $50\%$ accuracy, sometimes matching the full model. Interestingly, while CBT provides $20$-sentence stories only the last is needed for comparably accurate prediction. By comparison, SQuAD and CNN appear better-constructed.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a framework for evaluation of machine reading comprehension gold standards"):
  with members:
    - "commonsense reasoning for natural language understanding a survey of benchmarks resources and approaches"
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "quick and not so dirty unsupervised selection of justification sentences for multi hop question answering"
    - "compositional questions do not necessitate multi hop reasoning"
    - "question answering is a format when is it useful"
    - "understanding dataset design choices for multi hop reasoning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "beat the ai investigating adversarial human annotations for reading comprehension"):
  with members:
    - "hellaswag can a machine really finish your sentence"
    - "quoref a reading comprehension dataset with questions requiring coreferential reasoning"
    - "assessing the benchmarking capacity of machine reading comprehension datasets"
    - "drop a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraphs"
    - "learning the difference that makes a difference with counterfactually augmented data"
    - "adversarial nli a new benchmark for natural language understanding"
    - "roberta a robustly optimized bert pretraining approach"
    - "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "practical annotation strategies for question answering datasets"):
  with members:
    - "mrqa 2019 shared task evaluating generalization in reading comprehension"
    - "multiqa an empirical investigation of generalization and transfer in reading comprehension"
    - "hotpotqa a dataset for diverse explainable multi hop question answering"
    - "what makes reading comprehension questions easier"
    - "emrqa a large corpus for question answering on electronic medical records"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "triviaqa a large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension"
    - "adversarial examples for evaluating reading comprehension systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "reasoning driven question answering for natural language understanding"):
  with members:
    - "on the capabilities and limitations of reasoning for natural language understanding"
    - "evidence sentence extraction for machine reading comprehension"
    - "question answering as global reasoning over semantic abstractions"
    - "going on a vacation takes longer than going for a walk a study of temporal commonsense understanding"
    - "cogcomptime a tool for understanding time in natural language text"
    - "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data"
    - "multi granularity hierarchical attention fusion networks for reading comprehension and question answering"
    - "multi hop knowledge graph reasoning with reward shaping"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "adversarial nli a new benchmark for natural language understanding"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial filters of dataset biases"
    - "hellaswag can a machine really finish your sentence"
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "abductive commonsense reasoning"
    - "codah an adversarially authored question answer dataset for common sense"
    - "do neural dialog systems use the conversation history effectively an empirical study"
    - "multi task deep neural networks for natural language understanding"
    - "are we modeling the task or the annotator an investigation of annotator bias in natural language understanding datasets"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "neural text summarization a critical evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "what comes next extractive summarization by next sentence prediction"
    - "neural extractive text summarization with syntactic compression"
    - "improving abstraction in text summarization"
    - "newsroom a dataset of 1 3 million summaries with diverse extractive strategies"
    - "content selection in deep learning models of summarization"
    - "a unified model for extractive and abstractive summarization using inconsistency loss"
    - "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data"
    - "generating wikipedia by summarizing long sequences"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "quizbowl the case for incremental question answering"):
  with members:
    - "multinomial adversarial networks for multi domain text classification"
    - "adversarial example generation with syntactically controlled paraphrase networks"
    - "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data"
    - "what can ai do for me evaluating machine learning interpretations in cooperative play"
    - "hotpotqa a dataset for diverse explainable multi hop question answering"
    - "what makes reading comprehension questions easier"
    - "studio ousia s quiz bowl question answering system"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "drop a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraphs"):
  with members:
    - "from recognition to cognition visual commonsense reasoning"
    - "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data"
    - "can a suit of armor conduct electricity a new dataset for open book question answering"
    - "hotpotqa a dataset for diverse explainable multi hop question answering"
    - "duorc towards complex language understanding with paraphrased reading comprehension"
    - "mcscript a novel dataset for assessing machine comprehension using script knowledge"
    - "the web as a knowledge base for answering complex questions"
    - "know what you don t know unanswerable questions for squad"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)