human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "source code properties of defective infrastructure as code scripts"
  Abstract: Context: In continuous deployment, software and services are rapidly deployed to end-users using an automated deployment pipeline. Defects in infrastructure as code (IaC) scripts can hinder the reliability of the automated deployment pipeline. We hypothesize that certain properties of IaC source code such as lines of code and hard-coded strings used as configuration values, show correlation with defective IaC scripts. Objective: The objective of this paper is to help practitioners in increasing the quality of infrastructure as code (IaC) scripts through an empirical study that identifies source code properties of defective IaC scripts. Methodology: We apply qualitative analysis on defect-related commits mined from open source software repositories to identify source code properties that correlate with defective IaC scripts. Next, we survey practitioners to assess the practitioner's agreement level with the identified properties. We also construct defect prediction models using the identified properties for 2,439 scripts collected from four datasets. Results: We identify 10 source code properties that correlate with defective IaC scripts. Of the identified 10 properties we observe lines of code and hard-coded string to show the strongest correlation with defective IaC scripts. Hard-coded string is the property of specifying configuration value as hard-coded string. According to our survey analysis, majority of the practitioners show agreement for two properties: include, the property of executing external modules or scripts, and hard-coded string. Using the identified properties, our constructed defect prediction models show a precision of 0.70~0.78, and a recall of 0.54~0.67.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "security smells in infrastructure as code scripts"):
  with members:
    - "characterizing the influence of continuous integration empirical results from 250 open source and proprietary projects"
    - "we don t need another hero the impact of heroes on software development"
    - "what is the connection between issues bugs and enhancements lessons learned from 800 software projects"
    - "rehearsal a configuration verification tool for puppet"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)