human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "an improved generic bet and run strategy for speeding up stochastic local search"
  Abstract: A commonly used strategy for improving optimization algorithms is to restart the algorithm when it is believed to be trapped in an inferior part of the search space. Building on the recent success of Bet-and-Run approaches for restarted local search solvers, we introduce an improved generic Bet-and-Run strategy. The goal is to obtain the best possible results within a given time budget t using a given black-box optimization algorithm. If no prior knowledge about problem features and algorithm behavior is available, the question about how to use the time budget most efficiently arises. We propose to first start k>=1 independent runs of the algorithm during an initialization budget t1 =0 time units in doing so), and then continuing these runs for the remaining t3=t-t1-t2 time units. In previous Bet-and-Run strategies, the decision maker D=currentBest would simply select the run with the best- so-far results at negligible time. We propose using more advanced methods to discriminate between "good" and "bad" sample runs, with the goal of increasing the correlation of the chosen run with the a-posteriori best one. We test several different approaches, including neural networks trained or polynomials fitted on the current trace of the algorithm to predict which run may yield the best results if granted the remaining budget. We show with extensive experiments that this approach can yield better results than the previous methods, but also find that the currentBest method is a very reliable and robust baseline approach.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "better software analytics via duo data mining algorithms using used by optimizers"):
  with members:
    - "finding faster configurations using flash"
    - "applications of psychological science for actionable analytics"
    - "is better data better than better data miners on the benefits of tuning smote for defect prediction"
    - "what is wrong with topic modeling and how to fix it using search based software engineering"
    - "data driven search based software engineering"
    - "500 times faster than deep learning a case study exploring faster methods for text mining stackoverflow"
    - "is one hyperparameter optimizer enough"
    - "predicting good configurations for github and stack overflow topic models"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)