human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "distributed differential privacy via shuffling"
  Abstract: We consider the problem of designing scalable, robust protocols for computing statistics about sensitive data. Specifically, we look at how best to design differentially private protocols in a distributed setting, where each user holds a private datum. The literature has mostly considered two models: the "central" model, in which a trusted server collects users' data in the clear, which allows greater accuracy; and the "local" model, in which users individually randomize their data, and need not trust the server, but accuracy is limited. Attempts to achieve the accuracy of the central model without a trusted server have so far focused on variants of cryptographic MPC, which limits scalability. #R##N#In this paper, we initiate the analytic study of a shuffled model for distributed differentially private algorithms, which lies between the local and central models. This simple-to-implement model, a special case of the ESA framework of [Bittau et al., '17], augments the local model with an anonymous channel that randomly permutes a set of user-supplied messages. For sum queries, we show that this model provides the power of the central model while avoiding the need to trust a central server and the complexity of cryptographic secure function evaluation. More generally, we give evidence that the power of the shuffled model lies strictly between those of the central and local models: for a natural restriction of the model, we show that shuffled protocols for a widely studied selection problem require exponentially higher sample complexity than do central-model protocols.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages"):
  with members:
    - "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"
    - "improved summation from shuffling"
    - "separating local shuffled differential privacy via histograms"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "private aggregation from fewer anonymous messages"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "federated learning strategies for improving communication efficiency"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "encode shuffle analyze privacy revisited formalizations and empirical evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "private heavy hitters and range queries in the shuffled model"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "that which we call private"
    - "private stochastic convex optimization with optimal rates"
    - "evaluating differentially private machine learning in practice"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "privacy amplification by subsampling tight analyses via couplings and divergences"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "private summation in the multi message shuffle model"):
  with members:
    - "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "private aggregation from fewer anonymous messages"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "manipulation attacks in local differential privacy"
    - "prochlo strong privacy for analytics in the crowd"
    - "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis"
    - "what can we learn privately"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the power of synergy in differential privacy combining a small curator with local randomizers"):
  with members:
    - "locally private k means clustering"
    - "blender enabling local search with a hybrid differential privacy model"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy through communication complexity"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"):
  with members:
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "learning without interaction requires separation"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "towards instance optimal private query release"
    - "test without trust optimal locally private distribution testing"
    - "locally private gaussian estimation"
    - "tight lower bounds for locally differentially private selection"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "linear and range counting under metric based local differential privacy"):
  with members:
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "secure and utility aware data collection with condensed local differential privacy"
    - "consistent and accurate frequency oracles under local differential privacy"
    - "capacity bounded differential privacy"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "utility optimized local differential privacy mechanisms for distribution estimation"
    - "practical locally private heavy hitters"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "practical and robust privacy amplification with multi party differential privacy"):
  with members:
    - "outis crypto assisted differential privacy on untrusted servers"
    - "separating local shuffled differential privacy via histograms"
    - "private heavy hitters and range queries in the shuffled model"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "secure and utility aware data collection with condensed local differential privacy"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "an algorithmic framework for differentially private data analysis on trusted processors"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "context aware local differential privacy"):
  with members:
    - "communication complexity in locally private distribution estimation and heavy hitters"
    - "federated heavy hitters discovery with differential privacy"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"
    - "test without trust optimal locally private distribution testing"
    - "inference under information constraints i lower bounds from chi square contraction"
    - "one sided differential privacy"
    - "practical locally private heavy hitters"
    - "optimal schemes for discrete distribution estimation under locally differential privacy"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)