human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "hopf higher order propagation framework for deep collective classification"
  Abstract: Given a graph where every node has certain attributes associated with it and some nodes have labels associated with them, Collective Classification (CC) is the task of assigning labels to every unlabeled node using information from the node as well as its neighbors. It is often the case that a node is not only influenced by its immediate neighbors but also by higher order neighbors, multiple hops away. Recent state-of-the-art models for CC learn end-to-end differentiable variations of Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) kernels to aggregate multi-hop neighborhood information. In this work, we propose a Higher Order Propagation Framework, HOPF, which provides an iterative inference mechanism for these powerful differentiable kernels. Such a combination of classical iterative inference mechanism with recent differentiable kernels allows the framework to learn graph convolutional filters that simultaneously exploit the attribute and label information available in the neighborhood. Further, these iterative differentiable kernels can scale to larger hops beyond the memory limitations of existing differentiable kernels. We also show that existing WL kernel-based models suffer from the problem of Node Information Morphing where the information of the node is morphed or overwhelmed by the information of its neighbors when considering multiple hops. To address this, we propose a specific instantiation of HOPF, called the NIP models, which preserves the node information at every propagation step. The iterative formulation of NIP models further helps in incorporating distant hop information concisely as summaries of the inferred labels. We do an extensive evaluation across 11 datasets from different domains. We show that existing CC models do not provide consistent performance across datasets, while the proposed NIP model with iterative inference is more robust.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)