human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "image based survival analysis for lung cancer patients using cnns"
  Abstract: Traditional survival models such as the Cox proportional hazards model are typically based on scalar or categorical clinical features. With the advent of increasingly large image datasets, it has become feasible to incorporate quantitative image features into survival prediction. So far, this kind of analysis is mostly based on radiomics features, i.e. a fixed set of features that is mathematically defined a priori. To capture highly abstract information, it is desirable to learn the feature extraction using convolutional neural networks. However, for tomographic medical images, model training is difficult because on the one hand, only few samples of 3D image data fit into one batch at once and on the other hand, survival loss functions are essentially ordering measures that require large batch sizes. In this work, we show that by simplifying survival analysis to median survival classification, convolutional neural networks can be trained with small batch sizes and learn features that predict survival equally well as end-to-end hazard prediction networks. Our approach outperforms the previous state of the art in a publicly available lung cancer dataset.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "survlime a method for explaining machine learning survival models"):
  with members:
    - "explaining the explainer a first theoretical analysis of lime"
    - "graphlime local interpretable model explanations for graph neural networks"
    - "evaluating explainers via perturbation"
    - "one explanation does not fit all a toolkit and taxonomy of ai explainability techniques"
    - "alime autoencoder based approach for local interpretability"
    - "explainable artificial intelligence xai concepts taxonomies opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai"
    - "measurable counterfactual local explanations for any classifier"
    - "enriching visual with verbal explanations for relational concepts combining lime with aleph"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)