human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "breaking the loop recursive proofs for coinductive predicates in fibrations"
  Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to develop and study recursive proofs of coinductive predicates. Such recursive proofs allow one to discover proof goals in the construction of a proof of a coinductive predicate, while still allowing the use of up-to techniques. This approach lifts the burden to guess invariants, like bisimulation relations, beforehand. Rather, they allow one to start with the sought-after proof goal and develop the proof from there until a point is reached, at which the proof can be closed through a recursion step. Proofs given in this way are both easier to construct and to understand, similarly to proofs given in cyclic proof systems or by appealing parameterised coinduction. #R##N#In this paper, we develop a framework for recursive proofs of coinductive predicates that are given through fibrational predicate liftings. This framework is built on the so-called later modality, which has made its appearance in type theoretic settings before. In particular, we show the soundness and completeness of recursive proofs, we prove that compatible up-to techniques can be used as inference rules in recursive proofs, and provide some illustrating examples.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "coinduction in uniform foundations for corecursive proof search with horn clauses"):
  with members:
    - "coinductive uniform proofs"
    - "towards coinductive theory exploration in horn clause logic position paper"
    - "productive corecursion in logic programming"
    - "guarded dependent type theory with coinductive types"
    - "proof relevant corecursive resolution"
    - "refinement type inference via horn constraint optimization"
    - "sequent calculus in the topos of trees"
    - "first steps in synthetic guarded domain theory step indexing in the topos of trees"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)