human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "optimizing noise level for perturbing geo location data"
  Abstract: With the tremendous increase in the number of smart phones, App stores have been overwhelmed with applications requiring geo-location access in order to provide their users better services through personalization. Revealing a user’s location to these third party Apps, no matter at what frequency, is a severe privacy breach which can have unpleasant social consequences. In order to prevent inference attacks derived from geo-location data, a number of location obfuscation techniques have been proposed in the literature. However, none of them provides any objective measure of privacy guarantee. Some work has been done to define differential privacy for geo-location data in the form of geo-indistinguishability with l privacy guarantee. These techniques do not utilize any prior background information about the Points of Interest (PoIs) of a user and apply Laplacian noise to perturb all the location coordinates. Intuitively, the utility of such a mechanism can be improved if the noise distribution is derived after considering some prior information about PoIs. In this paper, we apply the standard definition of differential privacy on geo-location data. We use first principles to model various privacy and utility constraints, prior background information available about the PoIs (distribution of PoI locations in a 1D plane) and the granularity of the input required by different types of apps, in order to produce a more accurate and a utility maximizing differentially private algorithm for geo-location data at the OS level. We investigate this for a particular category of Apps and for some specific scenarios. This will also help us to verify whether Laplacian noise is still the optimal perturbation when we have such prior information.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)