human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "delegated search approximates efficient search"
  Abstract: There are many settings in which a principal performs a task by delegating it to an agent, who searches over possible solutions and proposes one to the principal. This describes many aspects of the workflow within organizations, as well as many of the activities undertaken by regulatory bodies, who often obtain relevant information from the parties being regulated through a process of delegation. A fundamental tension underlying delegation is the fact that the agent's interests will typically differ -- potentially significantly -- from the interests of the principal, and as a result the agent may propose solutions based on their own incentives that are inefficient for the principal. A basic problem, therefore, is to design mechanisms by which the principal can constrain the set of proposals they are willing to accept from the agent, to ensure a certain level of quality for the principal from the proposed solution. #R##N#In this work, we investigate how much the principal loses -- quantitatively, in terms of the objective they are trying to optimize -- when they delegate to an agent. We develop a methodology for bounding this loss of efficiency, and show that in a very general model of delegation, there is a family of mechanisms achieving a universal bound on the ratio between the quality of the solution obtained through delegation and the quality the principal could obtain in an idealized benchmark where they searched for a solution themself. Moreover, it is possible to achieve such bounds through mechanisms with a natural threshold structure, which are thus structurally simpler than the optimal mechanisms typically considered in the literature on delegation. At the heart of our framework is an unexpected connection between delegation and the analysis of prophet inequalities, which we leverage to provide bounds on the behavior of our delegation mechanisms.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the complexity of contracts"):
  with members:
    - "a duality based unified approach to bayesian mechanism design"
    - "simple versus optimal contracts"
    - "bernoulli factories and black box reductions in mechanism design"
    - "the menu size complexity of revenue approximation"
    - "algorithmic bayesian persuasion"
    - "mixture selection mechanism design and signaling"
    - "non optimal mechanism design"
    - "a simple and approximately optimal mechanism for an additive buyer"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the secretary recommendation problem"):
  with members:
    - "combinatorial secretary problems with ordinal information"
    - "algorithmic persuasion with no externalities"
    - "beyond matroids secretary problem and prophet inequality with general constraints"
    - "algorithmic bayesian persuasion"
    - "online independent set beyond the worst case secretaries prophets and periods"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "optimal common contract with heterogeneous agents"):
  with members:
    - "optimal mechanisms with budget for user generated contents"
    - "mixed strategies in combinatorial agency"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "simple versus optimal contracts"):
  with members:
    - "how do classifiers induce agents to invest effort strategically"
    - "adaptive contract design for crowdsourcing markets bandit algorithms for repeated principal agent problems"
    - "constrained signaling in auction design"
    - "send mixed signals earn more work less"
    - "mixed strategies in combinatorial agency"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)