human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a new system wide diversity measure for recommendations with efficient algorithms"
  Abstract: Recommender systems often operate on item catalogs clustered by genres, and user bases that have natural clusterings into user types by demographic or psychographic attributes. Prior work on system-wide diversity has mainly focused on defining intent-aware metrics among such categories and maximizing relevance of the resulting recommendations, but has not combined the notions of diversity from the two point of views of items and users. In this work, (1) we introduce two new system-wide diversity metrics to simultaneously address the problems of diversifying the categories of items that each user sees, diversifying the types of users that each item is shown, and maintaining high recommendation quality. We model this as a subgraph selection problem on the bipartite graph of candidate recommendations between users and items. (2) In the case of disjoint item categories and user types, we show that the resulting problems can be solved exactly in polynomial time, by a reduction to a minimum cost flow problem. (3) In the case of non-disjoint categories and user types, we prove NP-completeness of the objective and present efficient approximation algorithms using the submodularity of the objective. (4) Finally, we validate the effectiveness of our algorithms on the MovieLens-1m and Netflix datasets, and show that algorithms designed for our objective also perform well on sales diversity metrics, and even some intent-aware diversity metrics. Our experimental results justify the validity of our new composite diversity metrics.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "multi category fairness in sponsored search auctions"):
  with members:
    - "discrimination through optimization how facebook s ad delivery can lead to biased outcomes"
    - "toward controlling discrimination in online ad auctions"
    - "balanced news using constrained bandit based personalization"
    - "fairness under composition"
    - "ranking with fairness constraints"
    - "fairness through awareness"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)