human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "limitations in learning an interpreted language with recurrent models"
  Abstract: In this submission I report work in progress on learning simplified interpreted languages by means of recurrent models. The data is constructed to reflect core properties of natural language as modeled in formal syntax and semantics: recursive syntactic structure and compositionality. Preliminary results suggest that LSTM networks do generalise to compositional interpretation, albeit only in the most favorable learning setting, with a well-paced curriculum, extensive training data, and left-to-right (but not right-to-left) composition.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "analyzing and interpreting neural networks for nlp a report on the first blackboxnlp workshop"):
  with members:
    - "semeval 2010 task 8 multi way classification of semantic relations between pairs of nominals"
    - "under the hood using diagnostic classifiers to investigate and improve how language models track agreement information"
    - "indicatements that character language models learn english morpho syntactic units and regularities"
    - "what do rnn language models learn about filler gap dependencies"
    - "rule induction for global explanation of trained models"
    - "understanding convolutional neural networks for text classification"
    - "deep k nearest neighbors towards confident interpretable and robust deep learning"
    - "lisa explaining recurrent neural network judgments via layer wise semantic accumulation and example to pattern transformation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "correlating neural and symbolic representations of language"):
  with members:
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "symbolic inductive bias for visually grounded learning of spoken language"
    - "language modeling teaches you more syntax than translation does lessons learned through auxiliary task analysis"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"
    - "how agents see things on visual representations in an emergent language game"
    - "analysis methods in neural language processing a survey"
    - "understanding learning dynamics of language models with svcca"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)