human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "image labeling with markov random fields and conditional random fields"
  Abstract: Most existing methods for object segmentation in computer vision are formulated as a labeling task. This, in general, could be transferred to a pixel-wise label assignment task, which is quite similar to the structure of hidden Markov random field. In terms of Markov random field, each pixel can be regarded as a state and has a transition probability to its neighbor pixel, the label behind each pixel is a latent variable and has an emission probability from its corresponding state. In this paper, we reviewed several modern image labeling methods based on Markov random field and conditional random Field. And we compare the result of these methods with some classical image labeling methods. The experiment demonstrates that the introduction of Markov random field and conditional random field make a big difference in the segmentation result.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "groundnet monocular ground plane normal estimation with geometric consistency"):
  with members:
    - "a baseline for 3d multi object tracking"
    - "real time correlation tracking via joint model compression and transfer"
    - "monocular 3d object detection with pseudo lidar point cloud"
    - "learning correspondence from the cycle consistency of time"
    - "unsupervised deep tracking"
    - "future near collision prediction from monocular video feasibility dataset and challenges"
    - "layoutnet reconstructing the 3d room layout from a single rgb image"
    - "deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "groundnet segmentation aware monocular ground plane estimation with geometric consistency"):
  with members:
    - "a baseline for 3d multi object tracking"
    - "monocular 3d object detection with pseudo lidar point cloud"
    - "learning correspondence from the cycle consistency of time"
    - "unsupervised deep tracking"
    - "future near collision prediction from monocular video feasibility dataset and challenges"
    - "layoutnet reconstructing the 3d room layout from a single rgb image"
    - "deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving"
    - "unsupervised learning of depth and ego motion from monocular video using 3d geometric constraints"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)