human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "online local pool generation for dynamic classifier selection an extended version"
  Abstract: Dynamic Classifier Selection (DCS) techniques have difficulty in selecting the most competent classifier in a pool, even when its presence is assured. Since the DCS techniques rely only on local data to estimate a classifier's competence, the manner in which the pool is generated could affect the choice of the best classifier for a given sample. That is, the global perspective in which pools are generated may not help the DCS techniques in selecting a competent classifier for samples that are likely to be mislabelled. Thus, we propose in this work an online pool generation method that produces a locally accurate pool for test samples in difficult regions of the feature space. The difficulty of a given area is determined by the classification difficulty of the samples in it. That way, by using classifiers that were generated in a local scope, it could be easier for the DCS techniques to select the best one for the difficult samples. For the query samples in easy regions, a simple nearest neighbors rule is used. In the extended version of this work, a deep analysis on the correlation between instance hardness and the performance of DCS techniques is presented. An instance hardness measure that conveys the degree of local class overlap is then used to decide when the local pool is used in the proposed scheme. The proposed method yielded significantly greater recognition rates in comparison to a Bagging-generated pool and two other global pool generation schemes for all DCS techniques evaluated. The proposed scheme's performance was also significantly superior to three state-of-the-art classification models and statistically equivalent to five of them. Moreover, an extended analysis on the computational complexity of the proposed method and of several DS techniques is presented in this version. We also provide the implementation of the proposed technique using the DESLib library on GitHub.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)