human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "pac ranking from pairwise and listwise queries lower bounds and upper bounds"
  Abstract: This paper explores the adaptive (active) PAC (probably approximately correct) top-$k$ ranking (i.e., top-$k$ item selection) and total ranking problems from $l$-wise ($l\geq 2$) comparisons under the multinomial logit (MNL) model. By adaptively choosing sets to query and observing the noisy output of the most favored item of each query, we want to design ranking algorithms that recover the top-$k$ or total ranking using as few queries as possible. For the PAC top-$k$ ranking problem, we derive a lower bound on the sample complexity (aka number of queries), and propose an algorithm that is sample-complexity-optimal up to an $O(\log(k+l)/\log{k})$ factor. When $l=2$ (i.e., pairwise comparisons) or $l=O(poly(k))$, this algorithm matches the lower bound. For the PAC total ranking problem, we derive a tight lower bound, and propose an algorithm that matches the lower bound. When $l=2$, the MNL model reduces to the popular Plackett-Luce (PL) model. In this setting, our results still outperform the state-of-the-art both theoretically and numerically. We also compare our algorithms with the state-of-the-art using synthetic data as well as real-world data to verify the efficiency of our algorithms.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "regret minimization in stochastic contextual dueling bandits"):
  with members:
    - "combinatorial bandits with relative feedback"
    - "a nearly instance optimal algorithm for top k ranking under the multinomial logit model"
    - "provably optimal algorithms for generalized linear contextual bandits"
    - "multi dueling bandits with dependent arms"
    - "multi dueling bandits and their application to online ranker evaluation"
    - "data driven rank breaking for efficient rank aggregation"
    - "double thompson sampling for dueling bandits"
    - "copeland dueling bandits"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "online preselection with context information under the plackett luce model"):
  with members:
    - "preselection bandits under the plackett luce model"
    - "regret minimisation in multinomial logit bandits"
    - "multinomial logit bandit with linear utility functions"
    - "preference based online learning with dueling bandits a survey"
    - "active ranking with subset wise preferences"
    - "automated algorithm selection survey and perspectives"
    - "pac battling bandits in the plackett luce model"
    - "a nearly instance optimal algorithm for top k ranking under the multinomial logit model"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "best item learning in random utility models with subset choices"):
  with members:
    - "active ranking with subset wise preferences"
    - "pac battling bandits in the plackett luce model"
    - "a nearly instance optimal algorithm for top k ranking under the multinomial logit model"
    - "multi dueling bandits with dependent arms"
    - "competitive analysis of the top k ranking problem"
    - "data driven rank breaking for efficient rank aggregation"
    - "relative upper confidence bound for the k armed dueling bandit problem"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "combinatorial bandits with relative feedback"):
  with members:
    - "pac battling bandits in the plackett luce model"
    - "a nearly instance optimal algorithm for top k ranking under the multinomial logit model"
    - "mnl bandit a dynamic learning approach to assortment selection"
    - "multi dueling bandits with dependent arms"
    - "thompson sampling for the mnl bandit"
    - "dcm bandits learning to rank with multiple clicks"
    - "multi dueling bandits and their application to online ranker evaluation"
    - "data driven rank breaking for efficient rank aggregation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "from pac to instance optimal sample complexity in the plackett luce model"):
  with members:
    - "active ranking with subset wise preferences"
    - "pac battling bandits in the plackett luce model"
    - "a nearly instance optimal algorithm for top k ranking under the multinomial logit model"
    - "multi dueling bandits with dependent arms"
    - "competitive analysis of the top k ranking problem"
    - "multi dueling bandits and their application to online ranker evaluation"
    - "data driven rank breaking for efficient rank aggregation"
    - "noisy sorting without resampling"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)