human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the taboo trap behavioural detection of adversarial samples"
  Abstract: Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have become a powerful toolfor a wide range of problems. Yet recent work has found an increasing variety of adversarial samplesthat can fool them. Most existing detection mechanisms against adversarial attacksimpose significant costs, either by using additional classifiers to spot adversarial samples, or by requiring the DNN to be restructured. In this paper, we introduce a novel defence. We train our DNN so that, as long as it is workingas intended on the kind of inputs we expect, its behavior is constrained, in that some set of behaviors are taboo. If it is exposed to adversarial samples, they will often cause a taboo behavior, which we can detect. Taboos can be both subtle and diverse, so their choice can encode and hide information. It is a well-established design principle that the security of a system should not depend on the obscurity of its design, but on some variable (the key) which can differ between implementations and bechanged as necessary. We discuss how taboos can be used to equip a classifier with just such a key, and how to tune the keying mechanism to adversaries of various capabilities. We evaluate the performance of a prototype against a wide range of attacks and show how our simple defense can defend against cheap attacks at scale with zero run-time computation overhead, making it a suitable defense method for IoT devices.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "detection and recovery of adversarial attacks with injected attractors"):
  with members:
    - "invisible backdoor attacks against deep neural networks"
    - "gotta catch em all using concealed trapdoors to detect adversarial attacks on neural networks"
    - "sitatapatra blocking the transfer of adversarial samples"
    - "hidden trigger backdoor attacks"
    - "feature denoising for improving adversarial robustness"
    - "characterizing adversarial subspaces using local intrinsic dimensionality"
    - "feature squeezing detecting adversarial examples in deep neural networks"
    - "obfuscated gradients give a false sense of security circumventing defenses to adversarial examples"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards certifiable adversarial sample detection"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial defense by restricting the hidden space of deep neural networks"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "gotta catch em all using concealed trapdoors to detect adversarial attacks on neural networks"
    - "sitatapatra blocking the transfer of adversarial samples"
    - "improving adversarial robustness via promoting ensemble diversity"
    - "stateful detection of black box adversarial attacks"
    - "scaling provable adversarial defenses"
    - "on the effectiveness of interval bound propagation for training verifiably robust models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "blackbox attacks on reinforcement learning agents using approximated temporal information"):
  with members:
    - "sitatapatra blocking the transfer of adversarial samples"
    - "stateful detection of black box adversarial attacks"
    - "an algorithmic perspective on imitation learning"
    - "black box adversarial attacks with limited queries and information"
    - "behavioral cloning from observation"
    - "rainbow combining improvements in deep reinforcement learning"
    - "adversarial attacks on neural network policies"
    - "tactics of adversarial attack on deep reinforcement learning agents"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "sitatapatra blocking the transfer of adversarial samples"):
  with members:
    - "adv bnn improved adversarial defense through robust bayesian neural network"
    - "to compress or not to compress understanding the interactions between adversarial attacks and neural network compression"
    - "deep defense training dnns with improved adversarial robustness"
    - "dynamic channel pruning feature boosting and suppression"
    - "magnet a two pronged defense against adversarial examples"
    - "squeeze and excitation networks"
    - "towards robust neural networks via random self ensemble"
    - "practical black box attacks against machine learning"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)