human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "what can linguistics and deep learning contribute to each other"
  Abstract: Joe Pater's target article calls for greater interaction between neural network research and linguistics. I expand on this call and show how such interaction can benefit both fields. Linguists can contribute to research on neural networks for language technologies by clearly delineating the linguistic capabilities that can be expected of such systems, and by constructing controlled experimental paradigms that can determine whether those desiderata have been met. In the other direction, neural networks can benefit the scientific study of language by providing infrastructure for modeling human sentence processing and for evaluating the necessity of particular innate constraints on language acquisition.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "linguistic knowledge and transferability of contextual representations"):
  with members:
    - "to tune or not to tune adapting pretrained representations to diverse tasks"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "cross lingual alignment of contextual word embeddings with applications to zero shot dependency parsing"
    - "what do rnn language models learn about filler gap dependencies"
    - "what s going on in neural constituency parsers an analysis"
    - "language modeling teaches you more syntax than translation does lessons learned through auxiliary task analysis"
    - "why self attention a targeted evaluation of neural machine translation architectures"
    - "can you tell me how to get past sesame street sentence level pretraining beyond language modeling"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "do rnns learn human like abstract word order preferences"):
  with members:
    - "what do rnn language models learn about filler gap dependencies"
    - "rnns as psycholinguistic subjects syntactic state and grammatical dependency"
    - "colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchically"
    - "revisiting the poverty of the stimulus hierarchical generalization without a hierarchical bias in recurrent neural networks"
    - "targeted syntactic evaluation of language models"
    - "do latent tree learning models identify meaningful structure in sentences"
    - "exploring the limits of language modeling"
    - "assessing the ability of lstms to learn syntax sensitive dependencies"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)