human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a neural network framework for fair classifier"
  Abstract: Machine learning models are extensively being used in decision making, especially for prediction tasks. These models could be biased or unfair towards a specific sensitive group either of a specific race, gender or age. Researchers have put efforts into characterizing a particular definition of fairness and enforcing them into the models. In this work, mainly we are concerned with the following three definitions, Disparate Impact, Demographic Parity and Equalized Odds. Researchers have shown that Equalized Odds cannot be satisfied in calibrated classifiers unless the classifier is perfect. Hence the primary challenge is to ensure a degree of fairness while guaranteeing as much accuracy as possible. #R##N#Fairness constraints are complex and need not be convex. Incorporating them into a machine learning algorithm is a significant challenge. Hence, many researchers have tried to come up with a surrogate loss which is convex in order to build fair classifiers. Besides, certain papers try to build fair representations by preprocessing the data, irrespective of the classifier used. Such methods, not only require a lot of unrealistic assumptions but also require human engineered analytical solutions to build a machine learning model. We instead propose an automated solution which is generalizable over any fairness constraint. We use a neural network which is trained on batches and directly enforces the fairness constraint as the loss function without modifying it further. We have also experimented with other complex performance measures such as H-mean loss, Q-mean-loss, F-measure; without the need for any surrogate loss functions. Our experiments prove that the network achieves similar performance as state of the art. #R##N#Thus, one can just plug-in appropriate loss function as per required fairness constraint and performance measure of the classifier and train a neural network to achieve that.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fairness by explicability and adversarial shap learning"):
  with members:
    - "counterfactual fairness removing direct effects through regularization"
    - "explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations"
    - "a framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning"
    - "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"
    - "explainable ai for trees from local explanations to global understanding"
    - "discriminative but not discriminatory a comparison of fairness definitions under different worldviews"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "classification with fairness constraints a meta algorithm with provable guarantees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "counterfactual fairness removing direct effects through regularization"):
  with members:
    - "a framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning"
    - "causal reasoning for algorithmic fairness"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "a reductions approach to fair classification"
    - "on fairness and calibration"
    - "equality of opportunity in supervised learning"
    - "direct and indirect effects"
    - "fairness through awareness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "leveraging semi supervised learning for fairness using neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "improved adversarial learning for fair classification"
    - "achieving fairness through adversarial learning an application to recidivism prediction"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "learning adversarially fair and transferable representations"
    - "fairness through computationally bounded awareness"
    - "realistic evaluation of deep semi supervised learning algorithms"
    - "a reductions approach to fair classification"
    - "on fairness and calibration"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)