human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "testing the efficient network training entr hypothesis initially reducing training image size makes convolutional neural network training for image recognition tasks more efficient"
  Abstract: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for image recognition tasks are seeing rapid advances in the available architectures and how networks are trained based on large computational infrastructure and standard datasets with millions of images. In contrast, performance and time constraints for example, of small devices and free cloud GPUs necessitate efficient network training (i.e., highest accuracy in the shortest inference time possible), often on small datasets. Here, we hypothesize that initially decreasing image size during training makes the training process more efficient, because pre-shaping weights with small images and later utilizing these weights with larger images reduces initial network parameters and total inference time. We test this Efficient Network TRaining (ENTR) Hypothesis by training pre-trained Residual Network (ResNet) models (ResNet18, 34, & 50) on three small datasets (steel microstructures, bee images, and geographic aerial images) with a free cloud GPU. Based on three training regimes of i) not, ii) gradually or iii) in one step increasing image size over the training process, we show that initially reducing image size increases training efficiency consistently across datasets and networks. We interpret these results mechanistically in the framework of regularization theory. Support for the ENTR hypothesis is an important contribution, because network efficiency improvements for image recognition tasks are needed for practical applications. In the future, it will be exciting to see how the ENTR hypothesis holds for large standard datasets like ImageNet or CIFAR, to better understand the underlying mechanisms, and how these results compare to other fields such as structural learning.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)