human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "quantum dynamical mode qdm a possible extension of belief function"
  Abstract: Dempster-Shafer evidence theory has been widely used in various fields of applications, because of the flexibility and effectiveness in modeling uncertainties without prior information. Besides, it has been proven that the quantum theory has powerful capabilities of solving the decision making problems, especially for modelling human decision and cognition. However, the classical Dempster-Shafer evidence theory modelled by real numbers cannot be integrated directly with the quantum theory modelled by complex numbers. So, how can we establish a bridge of communications between the classical Dempster-Shafer evidence theory and the quantum theory? To answer this question, a generalized Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is proposed in this paper. The main contribution in this study is that, unlike the existing evidence theory, a mass function in the generalized Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is modelled by a complex number, called as a complex mass function. In addition, compared with the classical Dempster's combination rule, the condition in terms of the conflict coefficient between two evidences K < 1 is released in the generalized Dempster's combination rule so that it is more general and applicable than the classical Dempster's combination rule. When the complex mass function is degenerated from complex numbers to real numbers, the generalized Dempster's combination rule degenerates to the classical evidence theory under the condition that the conflict coefficient between the evidences K is less than 1. Numerical examples are illustrated to show the efficiency of the generalized Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Finally, an application of an evidential quantum dynamical model is implemented by integrating the generalized Dempster-Shafer evidence theory with the quantum dynamical model. From the experimental results, it validates the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)