human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "entity tracking improves cloze style reading comprehension"
  Abstract: Reading comprehension tasks test the ability of models to process long-term context and remember salient information. Recent work has shown that relatively simple neural methods such as the Attention Sum-Reader can perform well on these tasks; however, these systems still significantly trail human performance. Analysis suggests that many of the remaining hard instances are related to the inability to track entity-references throughout documents. This work focuses on these hard entity tracking cases with two extensions: (1) additional entity features, and (2) training with a multi-task tracking objective. We show that these simple modifications improve performance both independently and in combination, and we outperform the previous state of the art on the LAMBADA dataset, particularly on difficult entity examples.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "attending to entities for better text understanding"):
  with members:
    - "quoref a reading comprehension dataset with questions requiring coreferential reasoning"
    - "spanbert improving pre training by representing and predicting spans"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "universal transformers"
    - "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding"
    - "probing neural network comprehension of natural language arguments"
    - "roberta a robustly optimized bert pretraining approach"
    - "neural models for reasoning over multiple mentions using coreference"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning to select track and generate for data to text"):
  with members:
    - "on the convergence of adam and beyond"
    - "data to text generation with content selection and planning"
    - "challenges in data to document generation"
    - "dynamic entity representations in neural language models"
    - "pointing the unknown words"
    - "context gates for neural machine translation"
    - "incorporating copying mechanism in sequence to sequence learning"
    - "neural text generation from structured data with application to the biography domain"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)