human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "greed is still good maximizing monotone submodular supermodular functions"
  Abstract: We analyze the performance of the greedy algorithm, and also a discrete semi-gradient based algorithm, for maximizing the sum of a suBmodular and suPermodular (BP) function (both of which are non-negative monotone non-decreasing) under two types of constraints, either a cardinality constraint or $p\geq 1$ matroid independence constraints. These problems occur naturally in several real-world applications in data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. The problems are ordinarily inapproximable to any factor (as we show). Using the curvature $\kappa_f$ of the submodular term, and introducing $\kappa^g$ for the supermodular term (a natural dual curvature for supermodular functions), however, both of which are computable in linear time, we show that BP maximization can be efficiently approximated by both the greedy and the semi-gradient based algorithm. The algorithms yield multiplicative guarantees of $\frac{1}{\kappa_f}\left[1-e^{-(1-\kappa^g)\kappa_f}\right]$ and $\frac{1-\kappa^g}{(1-\kappa^g)\kappa_f + p}$ for the two types of constraints respectively. For pure monotone supermodular constrained maximization, these yield $1-\kappa^g$ and $(1-\kappa^g)/p$ for the two types of constraints respectively. We also analyze the hardness of BP maximization and show that our guarantees match hardness by a constant factor and by $O(\ln(p))$ respectively. Computational experiments are also provided supporting our analysis.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on maximization of weakly modular functions guarantees of multi stage algorithms tractability and hardness"):
  with members:
    - "beyond submodular maximization"
    - "fast parallel algorithms for feature selection"
    - "submodular maximization beyond non negativity guarantees fast algorithms and applications"
    - "an exponential speedup in parallel running time for submodular maximization without loss in approximation"
    - "fast greedy algorithms for dictionary selection with generalized sparsity constraints"
    - "weakly submodular maximization beyond cardinality constraints does randomization help greedy"
    - "pmlb a large benchmark suite for machine learning evaluation and comparison"
    - "guarantees for greedy maximization of non submodular functions with applications"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)