human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "finite sample analysis of the gtd policy evaluation algorithms in markov setting"
  Abstract: In reinforcement learning (RL) , one of the key components is policy evaluation, which aims to estimate the value function (i.e., expected long-term accumulated reward) of a policy. With a good policy evaluation method, the RL algorithms will estimate the value function more accurately and find a better policy. When the state space is large or continuous \emph{Gradient-based Temporal Difference(GTD)} policy evaluation algorithms with linear function approximation are widely used. Considering that the collection of the evaluation data is both time and reward consuming, a clear understanding of the finite sample performance of the policy evaluation algorithms is very important to reinforcement learning. Under the assumption that data are i.i.d. generated, previous work provided the finite sample analysis of the GTD algorithms with constant step size by converting them into convex-concave saddle point problems. However, it is well-known that, the data are generated from Markov processes rather than i.i.d. in RL problems.. In this paper, in the realistic Markov setting, we derive the finite sample bounds for the general convex-concave saddle point problems, and hence for the GTD algorithms. We have the following discussions based on our bounds. (1) With variants of step size, GTD algorithms converge. (2) The convergence rate is determined by the step size, with the mixing time of the Markov process as the coefficient. The faster the Markov processes mix, the faster the convergence. (3) We explain that the experience replay trick is effective by improving the mixing property of the Markov process. To the best of our knowledge, our analysis is the first to provide finite sample bounds for the GTD algorithms in Markov setting.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "reanalysis of variance reduced temporal difference learning"):
  with members:
    - "finite time error bounds for linear stochastic approximation and td learning"
    - "two time scale off policy td learning non asymptotic analysis over markovian samples"
    - "finite sample analysis for sarsa with linear function approximation"
    - "svrg for policy evaluation with fewer gradient evaluations"
    - "target based temporal difference learning"
    - "characterizing the exact behaviors of temporal difference learning algorithms using markov jump linear system theory"
    - "neural temporal difference learning converges to global optima"
    - "a finite time analysis of temporal difference learning with linear function approximation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "neural temporal difference learning converges to global optima"):
  with members:
    - "finite sample analysis for sarsa and q learning with linear function approximation"
    - "finite time error bounds for linear stochastic approximation and td learning"
    - "fine grained analysis of optimization and generalization for overparameterized two layer neural networks"
    - "a finite time analysis of temporal difference learning with linear function approximation"
    - "feature based aggregation and deep reinforcement learning a survey and some new implementations"
    - "learning and generalization in overparameterized neural networks going beyond two layers"
    - "td or not td analyzing the role of temporal differencing in deep reinforcement learning"
    - "towards understanding the role of over parametrization in generalization of neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on the global convergence of actor critic a case for linear quadratic regulator with ergodic cost"):
  with members:
    - "on the global convergence of imitation learning a case for linear quadratic regulator"
    - "the gap between model based and model free methods on the linear quadratic regulator an asymptotic viewpoint"
    - "derivative free methods for policy optimization guarantees for linear quadratic systems"
    - "global convergence of policy gradient methods for the linear quadratic regulator"
    - "training generative adversarial networks via primal dual subgradient methods a lagrangian perspective on gan"
    - "regret bounds for robust adaptive control of the linear quadratic regulator"
    - "learning without mixing towards a sharp analysis of linear system identification"
    - "sbeed convergent reinforcement learning with nonlinear function approximation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "expected sarsa λ with control variate for variance reduction"):
  with members:
    - "per decision multi step temporal difference learning with control variates"
    - "finite sample analysis of two timescale stochastic approximation with applications to reinforcement learning"
    - "multi step off policy learning without importance sampling ratios"
    - "finite sample analyses for td 0 with function approximation"
    - "convergent tree backup and retrace with function approximation"
    - "investigating practical linear temporal difference learning"
    - "an emphatic approach to the problem of off policy temporal difference learning"
    - "on convergence of emphatic temporal difference learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "convergent tree backup and retrace with function approximation"):
  with members:
    - "linear stochastic approximation constant step size and iterate averaging"
    - "finite sample analysis of two timescale stochastic approximation with applications to reinforcement learning"
    - "multi step off policy learning without importance sampling ratios"
    - "stochastic variance reduction methods for policy evaluation"
    - "stochastic variance reduction methods for saddle point problems"
    - "sample efficient actor critic with experience replay"
    - "asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning"
    - "an emphatic approach to the problem of off policy temporal difference learning"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)