human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "language modeling teaches you more syntax than translation does lessons learned through auxiliary task analysis"
  Abstract: Recent work using auxiliary prediction task classifiers to investigate the properties of LSTM representations has begun to shed light on why pretrained representations, like ELMo (Peters et al., 2018) and CoVe (McCann et al., 2017), are so beneficial for neural language understanding models. We still, though, do not yet have a clear understanding of how the choice of pretraining objective affects the type of linguistic information that models learn. With this in mind, we compare four objectives---language modeling, translation, skip-thought, and autoencoding---on their ability to induce syntactic and part-of-speech information. We make a fair comparison between the tasks by holding constant the quantity and genre of the training data, as well as the LSTM architecture. We find that representations from language models consistently perform best on our syntactic auxiliary prediction tasks, even when trained on relatively small amounts of data. These results suggest that language modeling may be the best data-rich pretraining task for transfer learning applications requiring syntactic information. We also find that the representations from randomly-initialized, frozen LSTMs perform strikingly well on our syntactic auxiliary tasks, but this effect disappears when the amount of training data for the auxiliary tasks is reduced.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the linguistic representational power of neural machine translation models"):
  with members:
    - "to tune or not to tune adapting pretrained representations to diverse tasks"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "the emergence of number and syntax units in lstm language models"
    - "a hybrid morpheme word representation for machine translation of morphologically rich languages"
    - "linguistic knowledge and transferability of contextual representations"
    - "the missing ingredient in zero shot neural machine translation"
    - "bpe and charcnns for translation of morphology a cross lingual comparison and analysis"
    - "what is one grain of sand in the desert analyzing individual neurons in deep nlp models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "linguistic knowledge and transferability of contextual representations"):
  with members:
    - "to tune or not to tune adapting pretrained representations to diverse tasks"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "cross lingual alignment of contextual word embeddings with applications to zero shot dependency parsing"
    - "what can linguistics and deep learning contribute to each other"
    - "what do rnn language models learn about filler gap dependencies"
    - "what s going on in neural constituency parsers an analysis"
    - "why self attention a targeted evaluation of neural machine translation architectures"
    - "can you tell me how to get past sesame street sentence level pretraining beyond language modeling"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "analyzing and interpreting neural networks for nlp a report on the first blackboxnlp workshop"):
  with members:
    - "semeval 2010 task 8 multi way classification of semantic relations between pairs of nominals"
    - "under the hood using diagnostic classifiers to investigate and improve how language models track agreement information"
    - "indicatements that character language models learn english morpho syntactic units and regularities"
    - "what do rnn language models learn about filler gap dependencies"
    - "rule induction for global explanation of trained models"
    - "understanding convolutional neural networks for text classification"
    - "deep k nearest neighbors towards confident interpretable and robust deep learning"
    - "lisa explaining recurrent neural network judgments via layer wise semantic accumulation and example to pattern transformation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "investigating multilingual nmt representations at scale"):
  with members:
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "consistency by agreement in zero shot neural machine translation"
    - "beto bentz becas the surprising cross lingual effectiveness of bert"
    - "multilingual neural machine translation with language clustering"
    - "cross lingual language model pretraining"
    - "massively multilingual neural machine translation"
    - "the missing ingredient in zero shot neural machine translation"
    - "sentencepiece a simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "what does bert look at an analysis of bert s attention"):
  with members:
    - "are sixteen heads really better than one"
    - "analyzing multi head self attention specialized heads do the heavy lifting the rest can be pruned"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "attention is not explanation"
    - "linguistic knowledge and transferability of contextual representations"
    - "visualizing attention in transformer based language representation models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "cloze driven pretraining of self attention networks"):
  with members:
    - "fairseq a fast extensible toolkit for sequence modeling"
    - "sentence encoders on stilts supplementary training on intermediate labeled data tasks"
    - "glue a multi task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding"
    - "scaling neural machine translation"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"
    - "learning word vectors for 157 languages"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "constituency parsing with a self attentive encoder"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "designing and interpreting probes with control tasks"):
  with members:
    - "linspector multilingual probing tasks for word representations"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "probing what different nlp tasks teach machines about function word comprehension"
    - "linguistic knowledge and transferability of contextual representations"
    - "under the hood using diagnostic classifiers to investigate and improve how language models track agreement information"
    - "analyzing learned representations of a deep asr performance prediction model"
    - "assessing composition in sentence vector representations"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "do attention heads in bert track syntactic dependencies"):
  with members:
    - "analyzing multi head self attention specialized heads do the heavy lifting the rest can be pruned"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "open sesame getting inside bert s linguistic knowledge"
    - "no training required exploring random encoders for sentence classification"
    - "what does bert look at an analysis of bert s attention"
    - "superglue a stickier benchmark for general purpose language understanding systems"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)