human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "individual fairness in hindsight"
  Abstract: Since many critical decisions impacting human lives are increasingly being made by algorithms, it is important to ensure that the treatment of individuals under such algorithms is demonstrably fair under reasonable notions of fairness. One compelling notion proposed in the literature is that of individual fairness (IF), which advocates that similar individuals should be treated similarly (Dwork et al. 2012). Originally proposed for offline decisions, this notion does not, however, account for temporal considerations relevant for online decision-making. In this paper, we extend the notion of IF to account for the time at which a decision is made, in settings where there exists a notion of conduciveness of decisions as perceived by the affected individuals. We introduce two definitions: (i) fairness-across-time (FT) and (ii) fairness-in-hindsight (FH). FT is the simplest temporal extension of IF where treatment of individuals is required to be individually fair relative to the past as well as future, while in FH, we require a one-sided notion of individual fairness that is defined relative to only the past decisions. We show that these two definitions can have drastically different implications in the setting where the principal needs to learn the utility model. Linear regret relative to optimal individually fair decisions is inevitable under FT for non-trivial examples. On the other hand, we design a new algorithm: Cautious Fair Exploration (CaFE), which satisfies FH and achieves sub-linear regret guarantees for a broad range of settings. We characterize lower bounds showing that these guarantees are order-optimal in the worst case. FH can thus be embedded as a primary safeguard against unfair discrimination in algorithmic deployments, without hindering the ability to take good decisions in the long-run.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fairness in learning based sequential decision algorithms a survey"):
  with members:
    - "achieving fairness in the stochastic multi armed bandit problem"
    - "fair contextual multi armed bandits theory and experiments"
    - "on the long term impact of algorithmic decision policies effort unfairness and feature segregation through social learning"
    - "the disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally"
    - "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"
    - "fairness with dynamics"
    - "group retention when using machine learning in sequential decision making the interplay between user dynamics and fairness"
    - "combinatorial sleeping bandits with fairness constraints"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "metric free individual fairness in online learning"):
  with members:
    - "online non convex learning following the perturbed leader is optimal"
    - "eliciting and enforcing subjective individual fairness"
    - "the measure and mismeasure of fairness a critical review of fair machine learning"
    - "the frontiers of fairness in machine learning"
    - "a reductions approach to fair classification"
    - "inherent trade offs in the fair determination of risk scores"
    - "efficient algorithms for adversarial contextual learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "advancing subgroup fairness via sleeping experts"):
  with members:
    - "multiaccuracy black box post processing for fairness in classification"
    - "online learning with an unknown fairness metric"
    - "the measure and mismeasure of fairness a critical review of fair machine learning"
    - "the externalities of exploration and how data diversity helps exploitation"
    - "an algorithmic framework to control bias in bandit based personalization"
    - "on preserving non discrimination when combining expert advice"
    - "fairness through computationally bounded awareness"
    - "a reductions approach to fair classification"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)