human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "directly estimating the variance of the lambda return using temporal difference methods"
  Abstract: This paper investigates estimating the variance of a temporal-difference learning agent's update target. Most reinforcement learning methods use an estimate of the value function, which captures how good it is for the agent to be in a particular state and is mathematically expressed as the expected sum of discounted future rewards (called the return). These values can be straightforwardly estimated by averaging batches of returns using Monte Carlo methods. However, if we wish to update the agent's value estimates during learning--before terminal outcomes are observed--we must use a different estimation target called the {\lambda}-return, which truncates the return with the agent's own estimate of the value function. Temporal difference learning methods estimate the expected {\lambda}-return for each state, allowing these methods to update online and incrementally, and in most cases achieve better generalization error and faster learning than Monte Carlo methods. Naturally one could attempt to estimate higher-order moments of the {\lambda}-return. This paper is about estimating the variance of the {\lambda}-return. Prior work has shown that given estimates of the variance of the {\lambda}-return, learning systems can be constructed to (1) mitigate risk in action selection, and (2) automatically adapt the parameters of the learning process itself to improve performance. Unfortunately, existing methods for estimating the variance of the {\lambda}-return are complex and not well understood empirically. We contribute a method for estimating the variance of the {\lambda}-return directly using policy evaluation methods from reinforcement learning. Our approach is significantly simpler than prior methods that independently estimate the second moment of the {\lambda}-return. Empirically our new approach behaves at least as well as existing approaches, but is generally more robust.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "kalman meets bellman improving policy evaluation through value tracking"):
  with members:
    - "a kernel loss for solving the bellman equation"
    - "batch kalman normalization towards training deep neural networks with micro batches"
    - "successor uncertainties exploration and uncertainty in temporal difference learning"
    - "soft actor critic off policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor"
    - "shallow updates for deep reinforcement learning"
    - "scalable trust region method for deep reinforcement learning using kronecker factored approximation"
    - "the uncertainty bellman equation and exploration"
    - "a distributional perspective on reinforcement learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "meta learning state based eligibility traces for more sample efficient policy evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "adaptive lambda least squares temporal difference learning"
    - "a greedy approach to adapting the trace parameter for temporal difference learning"
    - "true online temporal difference learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "incrementally learning functions of the return"):
  with members:
    - "reinforcement learning with unsupervised auxiliary tasks"
    - "a greedy approach to adapting the trace parameter for temporal difference learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "evolution guided policy gradient in reinforcement learning"):
  with members:
    - "impala scalable distributed deep rl with importance weighted actor learner architectures"
    - "gep pg decoupling exploration and exploitation in deep reinforcement learning algorithms"
    - "addressing function approximation error in actor critic methods"
    - "diversity is all you need learning skills without a reward function"
    - "soft actor critic off policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor"
    - "deep reinforcement learning that matters"
    - "parameter space noise for exploration"
    - "hindsight experience replay"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)