human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "testing graph clusterability algorithms and lower bounds"
  Abstract: We consider the problem of testing graph cluster structure: given access to a graph $G=(V, E)$, can we quickly determine whether the graph can be partitioned into a few clusters with good inner conductance, or is far from any such graph? This is a generalization of the well-studied problem of testing graph expansion, where one wants to distinguish between the graph having good expansion (i.e.\ being a good single cluster) and the graph having a sparse cut (i.e.\ being a union of at least two clusters). A recent work of Czumaj, Peng, and Sohler (STOC'15) gave an ingenious sublinear time algorithm for testing $k$-clusterability in time $\tilde{O}(n^{1/2} \text{poly}(k))$: their algorithm implicitly embeds a random sample of vertices of the graph into Euclidean space, and then clusters the samples based on estimates of Euclidean distances between the points. This yields a very efficient testing algorithm, but only works if the cluster structure is very strong: it is necessary to assume that the gap between conductances of accepted and rejected graphs is at least logarithmic in the size of the graph $G$. In this paper we show how one can leverage more refined geometric information, namely angles as opposed to distances, to obtain a sublinear time tester that works even when the gap is a sufficiently large constant. Our tester is based on the singular value decomposition of a natural matrix derived from random walk transition probabilities from a small sample of seed nodes. #R##N#We complement our algorithm with a matching lower bound on the query complexity of testing clusterability. Our lower bound is based on a novel property testing problem, which we analyze using Fourier analytic tools. As a byproduct of our techniques, we also achieve new lower bounds for the problem of approximating MAX-CUT value in sublinear time.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "graph clustering via qubo and digital annealing"):
  with members:
    - "using synthetic networks for parameter tuning in community detection"
    - "a statistical density based analysis of graph clustering algorithm performance"
    - "a tutorial on formulating and using qubo models"
    - "axioms for graph clustering quality functions"
    - "defining and evaluating network communities based on ground truth"
    - "a tutorial on spectral clustering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "walking randomly massively and efficiently"):
  with members:
    - "exponentially faster massively parallel maximal matching"
    - "simulating random walks on graphs in the streaming model"
    - "matching and mis for uniformly sparse graphs in the low memory mpc model"
    - "massively parallel algorithms for finding well connected components in sparse graphs"
    - "sparsifying distributed algorithms with ramifications in massively parallel computation and centralized local computation"
    - "weighted matchings via unweighted augmentations"
    - "round compression for parallel graph algorithms in strongly sublinear space"
    - "greedy and local ratio algorithms in the mapreduce model"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "robust clustering oracle and local reconstructor of cluster structure of graphs"):
  with members:
    - "approximate correlation clustering using same cluster queries"
    - "approximate clustering with same cluster queries"
    - "clustering with same cluster queries"
    - "learning communities in the presence of errors"
    - "testing cluster structure of graphs"
    - "how robust are reconstruction thresholds for community detection"
    - "correlation clustering with noisy partial information"
    - "partitioning well clustered graphs spectral clustering works"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "spectral methods for testing cluster structure of graphs"):
  with members:
    - "testing cluster structure of graphs"
    - "optimal algorithms for testing closeness of discrete distributions"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)