human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "exploratory and live programming and coding a literature study comparing perspectives on liveness"
  Abstract: Various programming tools, languages, and environments give programmers the impression of changing a program while it is running. This experience of liveness has been discussed for over two decades and a broad spectrum of research on this topic exists. Amongst others, this work has been carried out in the communities around three major ideas which incorporate liveness as an important aspect: live programming, exploratory programming, and live coding. While there have been publications on the focus of each particular community, the overall spectrum of liveness across these three communities has not been investigated yet. Thus, we want to delineate the variety of research on liveness. At the same time, we want to investigate overlaps and differences in the values and contributions between the three communities. #R##N#Therefore, we conducted a literature study with a sample of 212 publications on the terms retrieved from three major indexing services. On this sample, we conducted a thematic analysis regarding the following aspects: motivation for liveness, application domains, intended outcomes of running a system, and types of contributions. We also gathered bibliographic information such as related keywords and prominent publications. #R##N#Besides other characteristics the results show that the field of exploratory programming is mostly about technical designs and empirical studies on tools for general-purpose programming. In contrast, publications on live coding have the most variety in their motivations and methodologies with a majority being empirical studies with users. As expected, most publications on live coding are applied to performance art. Finally, research on live programming is mostly motivated by making programming more accessible and easier to understand, evaluating their tool designs through empirical studies with users. #R##N#In delineating the spectrum of work on liveness, we hope to make the individual communities more aware of the work of the others. Further, by giving an overview of the values and methods of the individual communities, we hope to provide researchers new to the field of liveness with an initial overview.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "foundations of a live data exploration environment"):
  with members:
    - "live functional programming with typed holes"
    - "types from data making structured data first class citizens in f"
    - "hazelnut a bidirectionally typed structure editor calculus"
    - "incremental computation with names"
    - "denotation of contextual modal type theory cmtt syntax and meta programming"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "lightweight lexical test prioritization for immediate feedback"):
  with members:
    - "babylonian style programming design and implementation of an integration of live examples into general purpose source code"
    - "a large scale empirical comparison of static and dynamic test case prioritization techniques"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "babylonian style programming design and implementation of an integration of live examples into general purpose source code"):
  with members:
    - "visual augmentation of source code editors a systematic mapping study"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "live functional programming with typed holes"):
  with members:
    - "augmenting source code lines with sample variable values"
    - "using elm to introduce algebraic thinking to k 8 students"
    - "imperative functional programs that explain their work"
    - "toward semantic foundations for program editors"
    - "a survey of symbolic execution techniques"
    - "dynamic witnesses for static type errors or ill typed programs usually go wrong"
    - "programmatic and direct manipulation together at last"
    - "semi automated svg programming via direct manipulation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.PL(Programming Languages)