human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "automatically detecting self reported birth defect outcomes on twitter for large scale epidemiological research"
  Abstract: In recent work, we identified and studied a small cohort of Twitter users whose pregnancies with birth defect outcomes could be observed via their publicly available tweets. Exploiting social media's large-scale potential to complement the limited methods for studying birth defects, the leading cause of infant mortality, depends on the further development of automatic methods. The primary objective of this study was to take the first step towards scaling the use of social media for observing pregnancies with birth defect outcomes, namely, developing methods for automatically detecting tweets by users reporting their birth defect outcomes. We annotated and pre-processed approximately 23,000 tweets that mention birth defects in order to train and evaluate supervised machine learning algorithms, including feature-engineered and deep learning-based classifiers. We also experimented with various under-sampling and over-sampling approaches to address the class imbalance. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier trained on the original, imbalanced data set, with n-grams, word clusters, and structural features, achieved the best baseline performance for the positive classes: an F1-score of 0.65 for the "defect" class and 0.51 for the "possible defect" class. Our contributions include (i) natural language processing (NLP) and supervised machine learning methods for automatically detecting tweets by users reporting their birth defect outcomes, (ii) a comparison of feature-engineered and deep learning-based classifiers trained on imbalanced, under-sampled, and over-sampled data, and (iii) an error analysis that could inform classification improvements using our publicly available corpus. Future work will focus on automating user-level analyses for cohort inclusion.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)