human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "multimodal social media analysis for gang violence prevention"
  Abstract: Gang violence is a severe issue in major cities across the U.S. and recent studies [Patton et al. 2017] have found evidence of social media communications that can be linked to such violence in communities with high rates of exposure to gang activity. In this paper we partnered computer scientists with social work researchers, who have domain expertise in gang violence, to analyze how public tweets with images posted by youth who mention gang associations on Twitter can be leveraged to automatically detect psychosocial factors and conditions that could potentially assist social workers and violence outreach workers in prevention and early intervention programs. To this end, we developed a rigorous methodology for collecting and annotating tweets. We gathered 1,851 tweets and accompanying annotations related to visual concepts and the psychosocial codes: aggression, loss, and substance use. These codes are relevant to social work interventions, as they represent possible pathways to violence on social media. We compare various methods for classifying tweets into these three classes, using only the text of the tweet, only the image of the tweet, or both modalities as input to the classifier. In particular, we analyze the usefulness of mid-level visual concepts and the role of different modalities for this tweet classification task. Our experiments show that individually, text information dominates classification performance of the loss class, while image information dominates the aggression and substance use classes. Our multimodal approach provides a very promising improvement (18% relative in mean average precision) over the best single modality approach. Finally, we also illustrate the complexity of understanding social media data and elaborate on open challenges.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "automatic discovery of political meme genres with diverse appearances"):
  with members:
    - "dynamic spatial verification for large scale object level image retrieval"
    - "dynamics of team library adoptions an exploration of github commit logs"
    - "needle in a haystack a framework for seeking small objects in big datasets"
    - "fighting fake news image splice detection via learned self consistency"
    - "beyond pixels image provenance analysis leveraging metadata"
    - "secure detection of image manipulation by means of random feature selection"
    - "on the origins of memes by means of fringe web communities"
    - "memesequencer sparse matching for embedding image macros"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "metoo on campus studying college sexual assault at scale using data reported on social media"):
  with members:
    - "contextual affective analysis a case study of people portrayals in online metoo stories"
    - "hate lingo a target based linguistic analysis of hate speech in social media"
    - "detecting the hate code on social media"
    - "using social media to promote stem education matching college students with role models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "hate speech in pixels detection of offensive memes towards automatic moderation"):
  with members:
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "detecting hate speech in social media"
    - "very deep convolutional networks for large scale image recognition"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "an overview of computational approaches for analyzing interpretation"):
  with members:
    - "methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks"
    - "adversarial defense based on structure to signal autoencoders"
    - "what do deep networks like to see"
    - "toward controlled generation of text"
    - "network dissection quantifying interpretability of deep visual representations"
    - "explaining recurrent neural network predictions in sentiment analysis"
    - "text summarization techniques a brief survey"
    - "explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep taylor decomposition"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)