human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on optimizing operator fusion plans for large scale machine learning in systemml"
  Abstract: Many large-scale machine learning (ML) systems allow specifying custom ML algorithms by means of linear algebra programs, and then automatically generate efficient execution plans. In this context, optimization opportunities for fused operators---in terms of fused chains of basic operators---are ubiquitous. These opportunities include (1) fewer materialized intermediates, (2) fewer scans of input data, and (3) the exploitation of sparsity across chains of operators. Automatic operator fusion eliminates the need for hand-written fused operators and significantly improves performance for complex or previously unseen chains of operations. However, existing fusion heuristics struggle to find good fusion plans for complex DAGs or hybrid plans of local and distributed operations. In this paper, we introduce an optimization framework for systematically reason about fusion plans that considers materialization points in DAGs, sparsity exploitation, different fusion template types, as well as local and distributed operations. In detail, we contribute algorithms for (1) candidate exploration of valid fusion plans, (2) cost-based candidate selection, and (3) code generation of local and distributed operations over dense, sparse, and compressed data. Our experiments in SystemML show end-to-end performance improvements with optimized fusion plans of up to 21x compared to hand-written fused operators, with negligible optimization and code generation overhead.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "spores sum product optimization via relational equality saturation for large scale linear algebra"):
  with members:
    - "using e graphs for cad parameter inference"
    - "laradb a minimalist kernel for linear and relational algebra computation"
    - "in database learning with sparse tensors"
    - "solving the join ordering problem via mixed integer linear programming"
    - "faq questions asked frequently"
    - "equality saturation a new approach to optimization"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)