human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a systematic classification of knowledge reasoning and context within the arc dataset"
  Abstract: The recent work of Clark et al. introduces the AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) and the associated ARC dataset that partitions open domain, complex science questions into an Easy Set and a Challenge Set. That paper includes an analysis of 100 questions with respect to the types of knowledge and reasoning required to answer them; however, it does not include clear definitions of these types, nor does it offer information about the quality of the labels. We propose a comprehensive set of definitions of knowledge and reasoning types necessary for answering the questions in the ARC dataset. Using ten annotators and a sophisticated annotation interface, we analyze the distribution of labels across the Challenge Set and statistics related to them. Additionally, we demonstrate that although naive information retrieval methods return sentences that are irrelevant to answering the query, sufficient supporting text is often present in the (ARC) corpus. Evaluating with human-selected relevant sentences improves the performance of a neural machine comprehension model by 42 points.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a framework for evaluation of machine reading comprehension gold standards"):
  with members:
    - "commonsense reasoning for natural language understanding a survey of benchmarks resources and approaches"
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "quick and not so dirty unsupervised selection of justification sentences for multi hop question answering"
    - "compositional questions do not necessitate multi hop reasoning"
    - "question answering is a format when is it useful"
    - "understanding dataset design choices for multi hop reasoning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "qasc a dataset for question answering via sentence composition"):
  with members:
    - "on the capabilities and limitations of reasoning for natural language understanding"
    - "improving question answering with external knowledge"
    - "question answering as global reasoning over semantic abstractions"
    - "drop a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraphs"
    - "what s missing a knowledge gap guided approach for multi hop question answering"
    - "from recognition to cognition visual commonsense reasoning"
    - "can a suit of armor conduct electricity a new dataset for open book question answering"
    - "hotpotqa a dataset for diverse explainable multi hop question answering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "assessing the benchmarking capacity of machine reading comprehension datasets"):
  with members:
    - "do neural dialog systems use the conversation history effectively an empirical study"
    - "superglue a stickier benchmark for general purpose language understanding systems"
    - "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data"
    - "hotpotqa a dataset for diverse explainable multi hop question answering"
    - "what makes reading comprehension questions easier"
    - "duorc towards complex language understanding with paraphrased reading comprehension"
    - "know what you don t know unanswerable questions for squad"
    - "think you have solved question answering try arc the ai2 reasoning challenge"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "improving question answering by commonsense based pre training"):
  with members:
    - "leveraging knowledge bases in lstms for improving machine reading"
    - "yuanfudao at semeval 2018 task 11 three way attention and relational knowledge for commonsense machine comprehension"
    - "learning beyond datasets knowledge graph augmented neural networks for natural language processing"
    - "can a suit of armor conduct electricity a new dataset for open book question answering"
    - "knowledgeable reader enhancing cloze style reading comprehension with external commonsense knowledge"
    - "kg 2 learning to reason science exam questions with contextual knowledge graph embeddings"
    - "think you have solved question answering try arc the ai2 reasoning challenge"
    - "mem2seq effectively incorporating knowledge bases into end to end task oriented dialog systems"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)