human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "tight competitive ratios of classic matching algorithms in the fully online model"
  Abstract: Huang et al.~(STOC 2018) introduced the fully online matching problem, a generalization of the classic online bipartite matching problem in that it allows all vertices to arrive online and considers general graphs. They showed that the ranking algorithm by Karp et al.~(STOC 1990) is strictly better than $0.5$-competitive and the problem is strictly harder than the online bipartite matching problem in that no algorithms can be $(1-1/e)$-competitive. #R##N#This paper pins down two tight competitive ratios of classic algorithms for the fully online matching problem. For the fractional version of the problem, we show that a natural instantiation of the water-filling algorithm is $2-\sqrt{2} \approx 0.585$-competitive, together with a matching hardness result. Interestingly, our hardness result applies to arbitrary algorithms in the edge-arrival models of the online matching problem, improving the state-of-art $\frac{1}{1+\ln 2} \approx 0.5906$ upper bound. For integral algorithms, we show a tight competitive ratio of $\approx 0.567$ for the ranking algorithm on bipartite graphs, matching a hardness result by Huang et al. (STOC 2018).

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "online stochastic max weight matching prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models"):
  with members:
    - "beating greedy for stochastic bipartite matching"
    - "online stochastic matching with edge arrivals"
    - "optimal single choice prophet inequalities from samples"
    - "an optimal monotone contention resolution scheme for bipartite matchings via a polyhedral viewpoint"
    - "near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems"
    - "prophet inequality for bipartite matching merits of being simple and non adaptive"
    - "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
    - "prophets and secretaries with overbooking"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "online graph matching problems with a worst case reassignment budget"):
  with members:
    - "beating greedy for stochastic bipartite matching"
    - "online matching with general arrivals"
    - "stochastic online metric matching"
    - "understanding zadimoghaddam s edge weighted online matching algorithm unweighted case"
    - "online maximum matching with recourse"
    - "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
    - "online vertex weighted bipartite matching beating 1 1 e with random arrivals"
    - "relaxing the irrevocability requirement for online graph algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "online primal dual meets online matching with stochastic rewards configuration lp to the rescue"):
  with members:
    - "vertex weighted online stochastic matching with patience constraints"
    - "online matching with stochastic rewards optimal competitive ratio via path based formulation"
    - "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
    - "maximum weight online matching with deadlines"
    - "online vertex weighted bipartite matching beating 1 1 e with random arrivals"
    - "online vertex weighted bipartite matching and single bid budgeted allocations"
    - "online stochastic matching online actions based on offline statistics"
    - "online stochastic matching beating 1 1 e"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "towards a better understanding of randomized greedy matching"):
  with members:
    - "beating greedy for stochastic bipartite matching"
    - "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
    - "matching with our eyes closed"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "prophet inequality for bipartite matching merits of being simple and non adaptive"):
  with members:
    - "near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems"
    - "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
    - "maximizing efficiency in dynamic matching markets"
    - "makespan minimization via posted prices"
    - "prophet inequalities made easy stochastic optimization by pricing non stochastic inputs"
    - "beyond matroids secretary problem and prophet inequality with general constraints"
    - "online contention resolution schemes"
    - "the invisible hand of dynamic market pricing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "computing maximum matchings in temporal graphs"):
  with members:
    - "temporal matching"
    - "how fast can we reach a target vertex in stochastic temporal graphs"
    - "fixed parameter algorithms for maximum profit facility location under matroid constraints"
    - "temporal vertex cover with a sliding time window"
    - "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
    - "sliding window temporal graph coloring"
    - "efficient and adaptive parameterized algorithms on modular decompositions"
    - "fully polynomial fpt algorithms for some classes of bounded clique width graphs"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "tight bounds for online edge coloring"):
  with members:
    - "online matching with general arrivals"
    - "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
    - "an economic based analysis of ranking for online bipartite matching"
    - "tighter bounds for online bipartite matching"
    - "deterministic distributed edge coloring with fewer colors"
    - "dynamic algorithms for graph coloring"
    - "deterministic distributed edge coloring via hypergraph maximal matching"
    - "online lower bounds via duality"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "online stochastic matching with edge arrivals"):
  with members:
    - "beating greedy for stochastic bipartite matching"
    - "online matching with general arrivals"
    - "prophet inequality for bipartite matching merits of being simple and non adaptive"
    - "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
    - "online matroid intersection beating half for random arrival"
    - "improved approximation algorithms for stochastic matching"
    - "improved bounds for online preemptive matching"
    - "buyback problem approximate matroid intersection with cancellation costs"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)