human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "large scale distributed algorithms for facility location with outliers"
  Abstract: This paper presents fast, distributed, $O(1)$-approximation algorithms for metric facility location problems with outliers in the Congested Clique model, Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model, and in the $k$-machine model. The paper considers Robust Facility Location and Facility Location with Penalties, two versions of the facility location problem with outliers proposed by Charikar et al. (SODA 2001). The paper also considers two alternatives for specifying the input: the input metric can be provided explicitly (as an $n \times n$ matrix distributed among the machines) or implicitly as the shortest path metric of a given edge-weighted graph. The results in the paper are: #R##N#- Implicit metric: For both problems, $O(1)$-approximation algorithms running in $O(\mbox{poly}(\log n))$ rounds in the Congested Clique and the MPC model and $O(1)$-approximation algorithms running in $\tilde{O}(n/k)$ rounds in the $k$-machine model. #R##N#- Explicit metric: For both problems, $O(1)$-approximation algorithms running in $O(\log\log\log n)$ rounds in the Congested Clique and the MPC model and $O(1)$-approximation algorithms running in $\tilde{O}(n/k)$ rounds in the $k$-machine model. #R##N#Our main contribution is to show the existence of Mettu-Plaxton-style $O(1)$-approximation algorithms for both Facility Location with outlier problems. As shown in our previous work (Berns et al., ICALP 2012, Bandyapadhyay et al., ICDCN 2018) Mettu-Plaxton style algorithms are more easily amenable to being implemented efficiently in distributed and large-scale models of computation.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "efficient distributed community detection in the stochastic block model"):
  with members:
    - "local mixing time distributed computation and applications"
    - "near optimal clustering in the k machine model"
    - "average whenever you meet opportunistic protocols for community detection"
    - "on the distributed complexity of large scale graph computations"
    - "find your place simple distributed algorithms for community detection"
    - "stochastic block model and community detection in the sparse graphs a spectral algorithm with optimal rate of recovery"
    - "fast distributed algorithms for connectivity and mst in large graphs"
    - "partitioning well clustered graphs spectral clustering works"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)