human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "from fair decision making to social equality"
  Abstract: The study of fairness in intelligent decision systems has mostly ignored long-term influence on the underlying population. Yet fairness considerations (e.g. affirmative action) have often the implicit goal of achieving balance among groups within the population. The most basic notion of balance is eventual equality between the qualifications of the groups. How can we incorporate influence dynamics in decision making? How well do dynamics-oblivious fairness policies fare in terms of reaching equality? In this paper, we propose a simple yet revealing model that encompasses (1) a selection process where an institution chooses from multiple groups according to their qualifications so as to maximize an institutional utility and (2) dynamics that govern the evolution of the groups' qualifications according to the imposed policies. We focus on demographic parity as the formalism of affirmative action. #R##N#We then give conditions under which an unconstrained policy reaches equality on its own. In this case, surprisingly, imposing demographic parity may break equality. When it doesn't, one would expect the additional constraint to reduce utility, however, we show that utility may in fact increase. In more realistic scenarios, unconstrained policies do not lead to equality. In such cases, we show that although imposing demographic parity may remedy it, there is a danger that groups settle at a worse set of qualifications. As a silver lining, we also identify when the constraint not only leads to equality, but also improves all groups. This gives quantifiable insight into both sides of the mismatch hypothesis. These cases and trade-offs are instrumental in determining when and how imposing demographic parity can be beneficial in selection processes, both for the institution and for society on the long run.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fairness in learning based sequential decision algorithms a survey"):
  with members:
    - "achieving fairness in the stochastic multi armed bandit problem"
    - "fair contextual multi armed bandits theory and experiments"
    - "on the long term impact of algorithmic decision policies effort unfairness and feature segregation through social learning"
    - "the disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally"
    - "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"
    - "fairness with dynamics"
    - "group retention when using machine learning in sequential decision making the interplay between user dynamics and fairness"
    - "combinatorial sleeping bandits with fairness constraints"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "balancing competing objectives with noisy data score based classifiers for welfare aware machine learning"):
  with members:
    - "a longitudinal analysis of youtube s promotion of conspiracy videos"
    - "the disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally"
    - "fairness and utilization in allocating resources with uncertain demand"
    - "fair classification and social welfare"
    - "noise tolerant fair classification"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "welfare and distributional impacts of fair classification"
    - "a flexible framework for multi objective bayesian optimization using random scalarizations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "pipeline interventions"):
  with members:
    - "the disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "downstream effects of affirmative action"
    - "a short term intervention for long term fairness in the labor market"
    - "fairness under composition"
    - "the frontiers of fairness in machine learning"
    - "gender productivity and prestige in computer science faculty hiring networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "pretrained ai models performativity mobility and change"):
  with members:
    - "biobert a pre trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining"
    - "on measuring social biases in sentence encoders"
    - "spanbert improving pre training by representing and predicting spans"
    - "patentbert patent classification with fine tuning a pre trained bert model"
    - "vilbert pretraining task agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision and language tasks"
    - "the ethics of ai ethics an evaluation of guidelines"
    - "end to end open domain question answering with"
    - "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "fair decisions despite imperfect predictions"):
  with members:
    - "consequential ranking algorithms and long term welfare"
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "a short term intervention for long term fairness in the labor market"
    - "online learning with an unknown fairness metric"
    - "learning non discriminatory predictors"
    - "algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness"
    - "fairness in reinforcement learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally"):
  with members:
    - "optimal decision making under strategic behavior"
    - "bias in bios a case study of semantic representation bias in a high stakes setting"
    - "long term impact of fair machine learning in sequential decision making representation disparity and group retention"
    - "the disparate effects of strategic manipulation"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "how do classifiers induce agents to invest effort strategically"
    - "a short term intervention for long term fairness in the labor market"
    - "the social cost of strategic classification"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "causal modeling for fairness in dynamical systems"):
  with members:
    - "counterfactual off policy evaluation with gumbel max structural causal models"
    - "understanding agent incentives using causal influence diagrams part i single action settings"
    - "the disparate effects of strategic manipulation"
    - "downstream effects of affirmative action"
    - "a short term intervention for long term fairness in the labor market"
    - "the social cost of strategic classification"
    - "woulda coulda shoulda counterfactually guided policy search"
    - "fairness through causal awareness learning latent variable models for biased data"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "consequential ranking algorithms and long term welfare"):
  with members:
    - "policy learning for fairness in ranking"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "reinforcement learning and control as probabilistic inference tutorial and review"
    - "a short term intervention for long term fairness in the labor market"
    - "equity of attention amortizing individual fairness in rankings"
    - "fairness of exposure in rankings"
    - "deconvolving feedback loops in recommender systems"
    - "ranking with fairness constraints"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)