human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "prams over integers do not compute maxflow efficiently"
  Abstract: Finding lower bounds in complexity theory has proven to be an extremely difficult task. In this article, we analyze two proofs of complexity lower bound: Ben-Or's proof of minimal height of algebraic computational trees deciding certain problems and Mulmuley's proof that restricted Parallel Random Access Machines (prams) over integers can not decide P-complete problems efficiently. We present the aforementioned models of computation in a framework inspired by dynamical systems and models of linear logic : graphings. #R##N#This interpretation allows to connect the classical proofs to topological entropy, an invariant of these systems; to devise an algebraic formulation of parallelism of computational models; and finally to strengthen Mulmuley's result by separating the geometrical insights of the proof from the ones related to the computation and blending these with Ben-Or's proof. Looking forward, the interpretation of algebraic complexity theory as dynamical system might shed a new light on research programs such as Geometric Complexity Theory.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "probabilistic complexity classes through semantics"):
  with members:
    - "characterizing co nl by a group action"
    - "interaction graphs full linear logic"
    - "towards a complexity through realizability theory"
    - "interaction graphs graphings"
    - "interaction graphs exponentials"
    - "interaction graphs multiplicatives"
    - "interaction graphs additives"
    - "geometric complexity theory ii towards explicit obstructions for embeddings among class varieties"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "zeta functions and the linear logic of markov processes"):
  with members:
    - "interaction graphs full linear logic"
    - "towards a complexity through realizability theory"
    - "interaction graphs graphings"
    - "interaction graphs exponentials"
    - "interaction graphs multiplicatives"
    - "interaction graphs additives"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "lower bounds for prams over z"):
  with members:
    - "interaction graphs full linear logic"
    - "interaction graphs graphings"
    - "interaction graphs exponentials"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)