human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "hardware aware machine learning modeling and optimization"
  Abstract: Recent breakthroughs in Deep Learning (DL) applications have made DL models a key component in almost every modern computing system. The increased popularity of DL applications deployed on a wide-spectrum of platforms have resulted in a plethora of design challenges related to the constraints introduced by the hardware itself. What is the latency or energy cost for an inference made by a Deep Neural Network (DNN)? Is it possible to predict this latency or energy consumption before a model is trained? If yes, how can machine learners take advantage of these models to design the hardware-optimal DNN for deployment? From lengthening battery life of mobile devices to reducing the runtime requirements of DL models executing in the cloud, the answers to these questions have drawn significant attention. #R##N#One cannot optimize what isn't properly modeled. Therefore, it is important to understand the hardware efficiency of DL models during serving for making an inference, before even training the model. This key observation has motivated the use of predictive models to capture the hardware performance or energy efficiency of DL applications. Furthermore, DL practitioners are challenged with the task of designing the DNN model, i.e., of tuning the hyper-parameters of the DNN architecture, while optimizing for both accuracy of the DL model and its hardware efficiency. Therefore, state-of-the-art methodologies have proposed hardware-aware hyper-parameter optimization techniques. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive assessment of state-of-the-art work and selected results on the hardware-aware modeling and optimization for DL applications. We also highlight several open questions that are poised to give rise to novel hardware-aware designs in the next few years, as DL applications continue to significantly impact associated hardware systems and platforms.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "leanconvnets low cost yet effective convolutional neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "imexnet a forward stable deep neural network"
    - "deep learning for audio signal processing"
    - "mixconv mixed depthwise convolutional kernels"
    - "drop an octave reducing spatial redundancy in convolutional neural networks with octave convolution"
    - "scalable methods for 8 bit training of neural networks"
    - "mobilenetv2 inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks"
    - "shufflenet v2 practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design"
    - "diagonalwise refactorization an efficient training method for depthwise convolutions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "nais neural architecture and implementation search and its applications in autonomous driving"):
  with members:
    - "skynet a champion model for dac sdc on low power object detection"
    - "co design of deep neural nets and neural net accelerators for embedded vision applications"
    - "frustrated with replicating claims of a shared model a solution"
    - "yolov3 an incremental improvement"
    - "proxylessnas direct neural architecture search on target task and hardware"
    - "searching toward pareto optimal device aware neural architectures"
    - "learning transferable architectures for scalable image recognition"
    - "squeezenet alexnet level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and 0 5mb model size"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "chamnet towards efficient network design through platform aware model adaptation"):
  with members:
    - "netadapt platform aware neural network adaptation for mobile applications"
    - "amc automl for model compression and acceleration on mobile devices"
    - "shufflenet v2 practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design"
    - "darts differentiable architecture search"
    - "resource efficient neural architect"
    - "grow and prune compact fast and accurate lstms"
    - "adam admm a unified systematic framework of structured weight pruning for dnns"
    - "mnasnet platform aware neural architecture search for mobile"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)