human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "towards a more practice aware runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms"
  Abstract: Theory of evolutionary computation (EC) aims at providing mathematically founded statements about the performance of evolutionary algorithms (EAs). The predominant topic in this research domain is runtime analysis, which studies the time it takes a given EA to solve a given optimization problem. Runtime analysis has witnessed significant advances in the last couple of years, allowing us to compute precise runtime estimates for several EAs and several problems. Runtime analysis is, however (and unfortunately!), often judged by practitioners to be of little relevance for real applications of EAs. Several reasons for this claim exist. We address two of them in this present work: #R##N#(1) EA implementations often differ from their vanilla pseudocode description, which, in turn, typically form the basis for runtime analysis. To close the resulting gap between empirically observed and theoretically derived performance estimates, we therefore suggest to take this discrepancy into account in the mathematical analysis and to adjust, for example, the cost assigned to the evaluation of search points that equal one of their direct parents (provided that this is easy to verify as is the case in almost all standard EAs). #R##N#(2) Most runtime analysis results make statements about the expected time to reach an optimal solution (and possibly the distribution of this optimization time) only, thus explicitly or implicitly neglecting the importance of understanding how the function values evolve over time. We suggest to extend runtime statements to runtime profiles, covering the expected time needed to reach points of intermediate fitness values. #R##N#As a direct consequence, we obtain a result showing that the greedy (2+1) GA of Sudholt [GECCO 2012] outperforms any unary unbiased black-box algorithm on OneMax.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "frequency fitness assignment making optimization algorithms invariant under bijective transformations of the objective function"):
  with members:
    - "quality diversity through surprise"
    - "evaluating map elites on constrained optimization problems"
    - "precise runtime analysis for plateaus"
    - "quality and diversity optimization a unifying modular framework"
    - "illuminating search spaces by mapping elites"
    - "a tabu search path relinking algorithm to solve the job shop scheduling problem"
    - "novelty search in competitive coevolution"
    - "evaluating las vegas algorithms pitfalls and remedies"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "offspring population size matters when comparing evolutionary algorithms with self adjusting mutation rates"):
  with members:
    - "self adjusting mutation rates with provably optimal success rules"
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"
    - "complexity theory for discrete black box optimization heuristics"
    - "towards a theory guided benchmarking suite for discrete black box optimization heuristics profiling 1 λ ea variants on onemax and leadingones"
    - "a general dichotomy of evolutionary algorithms on monotone functions"
    - "on the effectiveness of simple success based parameter selection mechanisms for two classical discrete black box optimization benchmark problems"
    - "adaptive population models for offspring populations and parallel evolutionary algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "maximizing drift is not optimal for solving onemax"):
  with members:
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"
    - "runtime analysis for self adaptive mutation rates"
    - "multiplicative drift analysis"
    - "a new method for lower bounds on the running time of evolutionary algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the 1 5 th rule with rollbacks on self adjustment of the population size in the 1 λ λ ga"):
  with members:
    - "runtime analysis of the 1 λ λ genetic algorithm on random satisfiable 3 cnf formulas"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "towards a theory guided benchmarking suite for discrete black box optimization heuristics profiling 1 λ ea variants on onemax and leadingones"):
  with members:
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"
    - "the 1 λ evolutionary algorithm with self adjusting mutation rate"
    - "coco performance assessment"
    - "coco a platform for comparing continuous optimizers in a black box setting"
    - "adaptive population models for offspring populations and parallel evolutionary algorithms"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)