human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "how to match when all vertices arrive online"
  Abstract: We introduce a fully online model of maximum cardinality matching in which all vertices arrive online. On the arrival of a vertex, its incident edges to previously-arrived vertices are revealed. Each vertex has a deadline that is after all its neighbors' arrivals. If a vertex remains unmatched until its deadline, the algorithm must then irrevocably either match it to an unmatched neighbor, or leave it unmatched. The model generalizes the existing one-sided online model and is motivated by applications including ride-sharing platforms, real-estate agency, etc. #R##N#We show that the Ranking algorithm by Karp et al. (STOC 1990) is $0.5211$-competitive in our fully online model for general graphs. Our analysis brings a novel charging mechanic into the randomized primal dual technique by Devanur et al. (SODA 2013), allowing a vertex other than the two endpoints of a matched edge to share the gain. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis of Ranking that beats $0.5$ on general graphs in an online matching problem, a first step towards solving the open problem by Karp et al. (STOC 1990) about the optimality of Ranking on general graphs. If the graph is bipartite, we show that the competitive ratio of Ranking is between $0.5541$ and $0.5671$. Finally, we prove that the fully online model is strictly harder than the previous model as no online algorithm can be $0.6317 < 1-\frac{1}{e}$-competitive in our model even for bipartite graphs.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "online stochastic max weight matching prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models"):
  with members:
    - "beating greedy for stochastic bipartite matching"
    - "online stochastic matching with edge arrivals"
    - "optimal single choice prophet inequalities from samples"
    - "an optimal monotone contention resolution scheme for bipartite matchings via a polyhedral viewpoint"
    - "near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems"
    - "prophet inequality for bipartite matching merits of being simple and non adaptive"
    - "tight competitive ratios of classic matching algorithms in the fully online model"
    - "prophets and secretaries with overbooking"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "online graph matching problems with a worst case reassignment budget"):
  with members:
    - "beating greedy for stochastic bipartite matching"
    - "online matching with general arrivals"
    - "stochastic online metric matching"
    - "understanding zadimoghaddam s edge weighted online matching algorithm unweighted case"
    - "tight competitive ratios of classic matching algorithms in the fully online model"
    - "online maximum matching with recourse"
    - "online vertex weighted bipartite matching beating 1 1 e with random arrivals"
    - "relaxing the irrevocability requirement for online graph algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "online primal dual meets online matching with stochastic rewards configuration lp to the rescue"):
  with members:
    - "vertex weighted online stochastic matching with patience constraints"
    - "online matching with stochastic rewards optimal competitive ratio via path based formulation"
    - "tight competitive ratios of classic matching algorithms in the fully online model"
    - "maximum weight online matching with deadlines"
    - "online vertex weighted bipartite matching beating 1 1 e with random arrivals"
    - "online vertex weighted bipartite matching and single bid budgeted allocations"
    - "online stochastic matching online actions based on offline statistics"
    - "online stochastic matching beating 1 1 e"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a simple 1 1 e approximation for oblivious bipartite matching"):
  with members:
    - "beating greedy for stochastic bipartite matching"
    - "perturbed greedy on oblivious matching problems"
    - "the price of information in combinatorial optimization"
    - "the stochastic matching problem beating half with a non adaptive algorithm"
    - "online vertex weighted bipartite matching and single bid budgeted allocations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "towards a better understanding of randomized greedy matching"):
  with members:
    - "beating greedy for stochastic bipartite matching"
    - "tight competitive ratios of classic matching algorithms in the fully online model"
    - "matching with our eyes closed"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "when hashing met matching efficient spatio temporal search for ridesharing"):
  with members:
    - "practical and optimal lsh for angular distance"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "prophet inequality for bipartite matching merits of being simple and non adaptive"):
  with members:
    - "near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems"
    - "tight competitive ratios of classic matching algorithms in the fully online model"
    - "maximizing efficiency in dynamic matching markets"
    - "makespan minimization via posted prices"
    - "prophet inequalities made easy stochastic optimization by pricing non stochastic inputs"
    - "beyond matroids secretary problem and prophet inequality with general constraints"
    - "online contention resolution schemes"
    - "the invisible hand of dynamic market pricing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "computing maximum matchings in temporal graphs"):
  with members:
    - "temporal matching"
    - "how fast can we reach a target vertex in stochastic temporal graphs"
    - "fixed parameter algorithms for maximum profit facility location under matroid constraints"
    - "tight competitive ratios of classic matching algorithms in the fully online model"
    - "temporal vertex cover with a sliding time window"
    - "sliding window temporal graph coloring"
    - "efficient and adaptive parameterized algorithms on modular decompositions"
    - "fully polynomial fpt algorithms for some classes of bounded clique width graphs"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)