human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "geographical scheduling for multicast precoding in multi beam satellite systems"
  Abstract: Current State-of-the-Art High Throughput Satellite systems provide wide-area connectivity through multi-beam architectures. Due to the tremendous system throughput requirements that next generation Satellite Communications (SatCom) expect to achieve, traditional 4-colour frequency reuse schemes are not sufficient anymore and more aggressive solutions as full frequency reuse are being considered for multi-beam SatCom. These approaches require advanced interference management techniques to cope with the significantly increased inter-beam interference both at the transmitter, e.g., precoding, and at the receiver, e.g., Multi User Detection (MUD). With respect to the former, several peculiar challenges arise when designed for SatCom systems. In particular, multiple users are multiplexed in the same transmission radio frame, thus imposing to consider multiple channel matrices when computing the precoding coefficients. In previous works, the main focus has been on the users' clustering and precoding design. However, even though achieving significant throughput gains, no analysis has been performed on the impact of the system scheduling algorithm on multicast precoding, which is typically assumed random. In this paper, we focus on this aspect by showing that, although the overall system performance is improved, a random scheduler does not properly tackle specific scenarios in which the precoding algorithm can poorly perform. Based on these considerations, we design a Geographical Scheduling Algorithm (GSA) aimed at improving the precoding performance in these critical scenarios and, consequently, the performance at system level as well. Through extensive numerical simulations, we show that the proposed GSA provides a significant performance improvement with respect to the legacy random scheduling.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)