human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "towards closing the gap in weakly supervised semantic segmentation with dcnns combining local and global models"
  Abstract: Generating training sets for deep convolutional neural networks is a bottleneck for modern real-world applications. This is a demanding tasks for applications where annotating training data is costly, such as in semantic segmentation. In the literature, there is still a gap between the performance achieved by a network trained on full and on weak annotations. In this paper, we establish a strategy to measure this gap and to identify the ingredients necessary to close it. #R##N#On scribbles, we establish state-of-the-art results: we obtain a gap in mIoU of 2.4% without CRF, and 2.9% with CRF post-processing. Thanks to a systematic study of the different ingredients involved in the weakly supervised scenario and an original experimental strategy, we unravel a counter-intuitive mechanism that is simple and amenable to generalisations to other weakly-supervised scenarios: averaging local predicted annotations with the baseline ones and reuse them for training a DCNN yields new state-of-the-art results. #R##N#Finally, closing the gap was reported only recently for bounding boxes in Khoreva et al. (arXiv:1603.07485v2), by requiring 10x more training images. By simulating varying amounts of pixel-level annotations respecting scribble human annotations statistics, we show that our training strategy reacts to small increases in the amount of annotations and requires only 2-5x more annotated pixels, closing the gap with only 3.1% of all pixels annotated. This work contributes new ideas towards closing the gap in real-world applications.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "gated crf loss for weakly supervised semantic image segmentation"):
  with members:
    - "rethinking imagenet pre training"
    - "convolutional crfs for semantic segmentation"
    - "learning pixel level semantic affinity with image level supervision for weakly supervised semantic segmentation"
    - "adaptive affinity fields for semantic segmentation"
    - "normalized cut loss for weakly supervised cnn segmentation"
    - "efficient relaxations for dense crfs with sparse higher order potentials"
    - "on regularized losses for weakly supervised cnn segmentation"
    - "encoder decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)