human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "concurrent games and semi random determinacy"
  Abstract: Consider concurrent, infinite duration, two-player win/lose games played on graphs. If the winning condition satisfies some simple requirement, the existence of Player 1 winning (finite-memory) strategies is equivalent to the existence of winning (finite-memory) strategies in finitely many derived one-player games. Several classical winning conditions satisfy this simple requirement. #R##N#Under an additional requirement on the winning condition, the non-existence of Player 1 winning strategies from all vertices is equivalent to the existence of Player 2 stochastic strategies winning almost surely from all vertices. Only few classical winning conditions satisfy this additional requirement, but a fairness variant of o

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "games where you can play optimally with finite memory"):
  with members:
    - "extending finite memory determinacy by boolean combination of winning conditions"
    - "trading bounds for memory in games with counters"
    - "window parity games an alternative approach toward parity games with time bounds"
    - "average energy games"
    - "non zero sum games for reactive synthesis"
    - "fixed dimensional energy games are in pseudo polynomial time"
    - "first cycle games"
    - "looking at mean payoff and total payoff through windows"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "determinacy in discrete bidding infinite duration games"):
  with members:
    - "all pay bidding games on graphs"
    - "infinite duration poorman bidding games"
    - "quantitative analysis of smart contracts"
    - "infinite duration bidding games"
    - "discrete all pay bidding games"
    - "first cycle games"
    - "on subgame perfection in quantitative reachability games"
    - "reasoning about strategies on the model checking problem"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "time aware uniformization of winning strategies"):
  with members:
    - "reachability games in dynamic epistemic logic"
    - "observation and distinction representing information in infinite games"
    - "strategy logic with imperfect information"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)