human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "towards formal definitions of blameworthiness intention and moral responsibility"
  Abstract: We provide formal definitions of degree of blameworthiness and intention relative to an epistemic state (a probability over causal models and a utility function on outcomes). These, together with a definition of actual causality, provide the key ingredients for moral responsibility judgments. We show that these definitions give insight into commonsense intuitions in a variety of puzzling cases from the literature.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "efficiently checking actual causality with sat solving"):
  with members:
    - "theoretical impediments to machine learning with seven sparks from the causal revolution"
    - "understanding and formalizing accountability for cyber physical systems"
    - "from causes for database queries to repairs and model based diagnosis and back"
    - "a modification of the halpern pearl definition of causality"
    - "the computational complexity of structure based causality"
    - "the complexity of causality and responsibility for query answers and non answers"
    - "what causes a system to satisfy a specification"
    - "responsibility and blame a structural model approach"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "deep tractable probabilistic models for moral responsibility"):
  with members:
    - "learning and testing causal models with interventions"
    - "a computational model of commonsense moral decision making"
    - "a voting based system for ethical decision making"
    - "on the latent variable interpretation in sum product networks"
    - "sum product networks a new deep architecture"
    - "evaluating influence diagrams with decision circuits"
    - "solving sat and bayesian inference with backtracking search"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "blameworthiness in games with imperfect information"):
  with members:
    - "blameworthiness in strategic games"
    - "strategically knowing how"
    - "coalition and group announcement logic"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"
    - "a logic of knowing how"
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)