human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the best of both worlds asymptotically efficient mechanisms with a guarantee on the expected gains from trade"
  Abstract: The seminal impossibility result of Myerson and Satterthwaite (1983) states that for bilateral trade, there is no mechanism that is individually rational (IR), incentive compatible (IC), weakly budget balanced, and efficient. This has led follow-up work on two-sided trade settings to weaken the efficiency requirement and consider approximately efficient simple mechanisms, while still demanding the other properties. The current state-of-the-art of such mechanisms for two-sided markets can be categorized as giving one (but not both) of the following two types of approximation guarantees on the gains from trade: a constant ex-ante guarantee, measured with respect to the second-best efficiency benchmark, or an asymptotically optimal ex-post guarantee, measured with respect to the first-best efficiency benchmark. Here the second-best efficiency benchmark refers to the highest gains from trade attainable by any IR, IC and weakly budget balanced mechanism, while the first-best efficiency benchmark refers to the maximum gains from trade (attainable by the VCG mechanism, which is not weakly budget balanced). #R##N#In this paper, we construct simple mechanisms for double-auction and matching markets that simultaneously achieve both types of guarantees: these are ex-post IR, Bayesian IC, and ex-post weakly budget balanced mechanisms that 1) ex-ante guarantee a constant fraction of the gains from trade of the second-best, and 2) ex-post guarantee a realization-dependent fraction of the gains from trade of the first-best, such that this realization-dependent fraction converges to 1 (full efficiency) as the market grows large.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "efficient two sided markets with limited information"):
  with members:
    - "optimal single choice prophet inequalities from samples"
    - "bulow klemperer style results for welfare maximization in two sided markets"
    - "improved truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders"
    - "online trading as a secretary problem"
    - "approximating gains from trade in two sided markets via simple mechanisms"
    - "fixed price approximability of the optimal gain from trade"
    - "online market intermediation"
    - "sbba a strongly budget balanced double auction mechanism"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "bulow klemperer style results for welfare maximization in two sided markets"):
  with members:
    - "the vickrey auction with a single duplicate bidder approximates the optimal revenue"
    - "99 revenue via enhanced competition"
    - "are two samples really better than one on the non asymptotic performance of empirical revenue maximization"
    - "optimal and benchmark optimal competition complexity for additive buyers over independent items"
    - "approximating gains from trade in two sided markets via simple mechanisms"
    - "submultiplicative glivenko cantelli and uniform convergence of revenues"
    - "a general theory of sample complexity for multi item profit maximization"
    - "learning multi item auctions with or without samples"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "simple mechanisms for profit maximization in multi item auctions"):
  with members:
    - "a duality based unified approach to bayesian mechanism design"
    - "approximating gains from trade in two sided markets via simple mechanisms"
    - "approximate revenue maximization with multiple items"
    - "simple mechanisms for subadditive buyers via duality"
    - "almost efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading"
    - "mechanism design for subadditive agents via an ex ante relaxation"
    - "approximately efficient two sided combinatorial auctions"
    - "online contention resolution schemes"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "approximately efficient two sided combinatorial auctions"):
  with members:
    - "approximating gains from trade in two sided markets via simple mechanisms"
    - "fixed price approximability of the optimal gain from trade"
    - "sbba a strongly budget balanced double auction mechanism"
    - "almost efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading"
    - "combinatorial auctions via posted prices"
    - "polymatroid prophet inequalities"
    - "matroid prophet inequalities"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)