human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "accurate fast and scalable kernel ridge regression on parallel and distributed systems"
  Abstract: Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) is a fundamental method in machine learning. Given an n-by-d data matrix as input, a traditional implementation requires Θ(n2) memory to form an n-by-n kernel matrix and Θ(n3) flops to compute the final model. These time and storage costs prohibit KRR from scaling up to large datasets. For example, even on a relatively small dataset (a 520k-by-90 input requiring 357 MB), KRR requires 2 TB memory just to store the kernel matrix. The reason is that n usually is much larger than d for real-world applications. On the other hand, weak scaling becomes a problem: if we keep d and n/p fixed as p grows (p is # machines), the memory needed grows as Θ(p) per processor and the flops as Θ(p2) per processor. In the perfect weak scaling situation, both the memory needed and the flops grow as Θ(1) per processor (i.e. memory and flops are constant). The traditional Distributed KRR implementation (DKRR) only achieved 0.32% weak scaling efficiency from 96 to 1536 processors.   We propose two new methods to address these problems: the Balanced KRR (BKRR) and K-means KRR (KKRR). These methods consider alternative ways to partition the input dataset into p different parts, generating p different models, and then selecting the best model among them. Compared to a conventional implementation, KKRR2 (optimized version of KKRR) improves the weak scaling efficiency from 0.32% to 38% and achieves a 591x speedup for getting the same accuracy by using the same data and the same hardware (1536 processors). BKRR2 (optimized version of BKRR) achieves a higher accuracy than the current fastest method using less training time for a variety of datasets. For the applications requiring only approximate solutions, BKRR2 improves the weak scaling efficiency to 92% and achieves 3505x speedup (theoretical speedup: 4096x).

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)