human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "accurate reconstruction of image stimuli from human fmri based on the decoding model with capsule network architecture"
  Abstract: In neuroscience, all kinds of computation models were designed to answer the open question of how sensory stimuli are encoded by neurons and conversely, how sensory stimuli can be decoded from neuronal activities. Especially, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies have made many great achievements with the rapid development of the deep network computation. However, comparing with the goal of decoding orientation, position and object category from activities in visual cortex, accurate reconstruction of image stimuli from human fMRI is a still challenging work. In this paper, the capsule network (CapsNet) architecture based visual reconstruction (CNAVR) method is developed to reconstruct image stimuli. The capsule means containing a group of neurons to perform the better organization of feature structure and representation, inspired by the structure of cortical mini column including several hundred neurons in primates. The high-level capsule features in the CapsNet includes diverse features of image stimuli such as semantic class, orientation, location and so on. We used these features to bridge between human fMRI and image stimuli. We firstly employed the CapsNet to train the nonlinear mapping from image stimuli to high-level capsule features, and from high-level capsule features to image stimuli again in an end-to-end manner. After estimating the serviceability of each voxel by encoding performance to accomplish the selecting of voxels, we secondly trained the nonlinear mapping from dimension-decreasing fMRI data to high-level capsule features. Finally, we can predict the high-level capsule features with fMRI data, and reconstruct image stimuli with the CapsNet. We evaluated the proposed CNAVR method on the dataset of handwritten digital images, and exceeded about 10% than the accuracy of all existing state-of-the-art methods on the structural similarity index (SSIM).

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)