human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "what is wrong with topic modeling and how to fix it using search based software engineering"
  Abstract: Abstract   Context  Topic modeling finds human-readable structures in unstructured textual data. A widely used topic modeling technique is Latent Dirichlet allocation. When running on different datasets, LDA suffers from “order effects”, i.e., different topics are generated if the order of training data is shuffled. Such order effects introduce a systematic error for any study. This error can relate to misleading results; specifically, inaccurate topic descriptions and a reduction in the efficacy of text mining classification results.    Objective  To provide a method in which distributions generated by LDA are more stable and can be used for further analysis.    Method  We use LDADE, a search-based software engineering tool which uses Differential Evolution (DE) to tune the LDA’s parameters. LDADE is evaluated on data from a programmer information exchange site (Stackoverflow), title and abstract text of thousands of Software Engineering (SE) papers, and software defect reports from NASA. Results were collected across different implementations of LDA (Python+Scikit-Learn, Scala+Spark) across Linux platform and for different kinds of LDAs (VEM, Gibbs sampling). Results were scored via topic stability and text mining classification accuracy.    Results  In all treatments: (i) standard LDA exhibits very large topic instability; (ii) LDADE’s tunings dramatically reduce cluster instability; (iii) LDADE also leads to improved performances for supervised as well as unsupervised learning.    Conclusion  Due to topic instability, using standard LDA with its “off-the-shelf” settings should now be depreciated. Also, in future, we should require SE papers that use LDA to test and (if needed) mitigate LDA topic instability. Finally, LDADE is a candidate technology for effectively and efficiently reducing that instability.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "argulens anatomy of community opinions on usability issues using argumentation models"):
  with members:
    - "activity based analysis of open source software contributors roles and dynamics"
    - "analysis and detection of information types of open source software issue discussions"
    - "how do the open source communities address usability and ux issues an exploratory study"
    - "argumentation mining in user generated web discourse"
    - "neural end to end learning for computational argumentation mining"
    - "easy over hard a case study on deep learning"
    - "parsing argumentation structures in persuasive essays"
    - "a computational approach to politeness with application to social factors"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "semantic source code models using identifier embeddings"):
  with members:
    - "code2vec learning distributed representations of code"
    - "learning word vectors for 157 languages"
    - "advances in pre training distributed word representations"
    - "toward incorporation of relevant documents in word2vec"
    - "a survey of machine learning for big code and naturalness"
    - "a syntactic neural model for general purpose code generation"
    - "easy over hard a case study on deep learning"
    - "item2vec neural item embedding for collaborative filtering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "how to dodge complex software analytics"):
  with members:
    - "finding faster configurations using flash"
    - "applications of psychological science for actionable analytics"
    - "the impact of automated parameter optimization on defect prediction models"
    - "is better data better than better data miners on the benefits of tuning smote for defect prediction"
    - "better software analytics via duo data mining algorithms using used by optimizers"
    - "500 times faster than deep learning a case study exploring faster methods for text mining stackoverflow"
    - "is one hyperparameter optimizer enough"
    - "predicting good configurations for github and stack overflow topic models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "is ai different for se"):
  with members:
    - "how to dodge complex software analytics"
    - "a benchmark study on sentiment analysis for software engineering research"
    - "applications of psychological science for actionable analytics"
    - "is better data better than better data miners on the benefits of tuning smote for defect prediction"
    - "better software analytics via duo data mining algorithms using used by optimizers"
    - "bellwethers a baseline method for transfer learning"
    - "less is more minimizing code reorganization using xtree"
    - "better predictors for issue lifetime"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "enhanced labeling of issue reports with f 3 t"):
  with members:
    - "how to dodge complex software analytics"
    - "replication can improve prior results a github study of pull request acceptance"
    - "applications of psychological science for actionable analytics"
    - "finding better active learners for faster literature reviews"
    - "we don t need another hero the impact of heroes on software development"
    - "bellwethers a baseline method for transfer learning"
    - "easy over hard a case study on deep learning"
    - "why is differential evolution better than grid search for tuning defect predictors"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "better security bug report classification via hyperparameter optimization"):
  with members:
    - "bad smells in software analytics papers"
    - "is better data better than better data miners on the benefits of tuning smote for defect prediction"
    - "hyperparameter optimization for effort estimation"
    - "less is more minimizing code reorganization using xtree"
    - "better data is better than better data miners benefits of tuning smote for defect prediction"
    - "a brief survey of text mining classification clustering and extraction techniques"
    - "why is differential evolution better than grid search for tuning defect predictors"
    - "tuning for software analytics"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "improved recognition of security bugs via dual hyperparameter optimization"):
  with members:
    - "the impact of class rebalancing techniques on the performance and interpretation of defect prediction models"
    - "less is more minimizing code reorganization using xtree"
    - "tuning for software analytics"
    - "smote synthetic minority over sampling technique"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "analysis and detection of information types of open source software issue discussions"):
  with members:
    - "how do the open source communities address usability and ux issues an exploratory study"
    - "rationale in development chat messages an exploratory study"
    - "tuning for software analytics"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)