human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "computing stable models of normal logic programs without grounding"
  Abstract: We present a method for computing stable models of normal logic programs, i.e., logic programs extended with negation, in the presence of predicates with arbitrary terms. Such programs need not have a finite grounding, so traditional methods do not apply. Our method relies on the use of a non-Herbrand universe, as well as coinduction, constructive negation and a number of other novel techniques. Using our method, a normal logic program with predicates can be executed directly under the stable model semantics without requiring it to be grounded either before or during execution and without requiring that its variables range over a finite domain. As a result, our method is quite general and supports the use of terms as arguments, including lists and complex data structures. A prototype implementation and non-trivial applications have been developed to demonstrate the feasibility of our method.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "imperative program synthesis from answer set programs"):
  with members:
    - "constraint answer set programming without grounding"
    - "dynamic consistency checking in goal directed answer set programming"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "extensions to justification theory"):
  with members:
    - "answering the why in answer set programming a survey of explanation approaches"
    - "lazy model expansion interleaving grounding with search"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "constraint answer set programming without grounding"):
  with members:
    - "constraint answer set solver ezcsp and why integration schemas matter"
    - "clingcon the next generation"
    - "a decidable subclass of finitary programs"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "improving adherence to heart failure management guidelines via abductive reasoning"):
  with members:
    - "a physician advisory system for chronic heart failure management based on knowledge patterns"
    - "clingo asp control preliminary report"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)