human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "scopus s source normalized impact per paper snip versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations"
  Abstract: Impact factors (and similar measures such as the Scimago Journal Rankings) suffer from two problems: (i) citation behavior varies among fields of science and therefore leads to systematic differences, and (ii) there are no statistics to inform us whether differences are significant. The recently introduced SNIP indicator of Scopus tries to remedy the first of these two problems, but a number of normalization decisions are involved which makes it impossible to test for significance. Using fractional counting of citations-based on the assumption that impact is proportionate to the number of references in the citing documents-citations can be contextualized at the paper level and aggregated impacts of sets can be tested for their significance. It can be shown that the weighted impact of Annals of Mathematics (0.247) is not so much lower than that of Molecular Cell (0.386) despite a five-fold difference between their impact factors (2.793 and 13.156, respectively).

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators"):
  with members:
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "citation analysis with microsoft academic"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a comparison of university performance scores and ranks by mncs and fss"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "quality versus quantity in scientific impact"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"):
  with members:
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "investigation of partition cells as a structural basis suitable for assessments of individual scientists"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "growth in the number of references in engineering journal papers during the 1972 2013 period"
    - "on the causes of subject specific citation rates in web of science"
    - "universality of scholarly impact metrics"
    - "citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "evaluating journal quality a review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management"):
  with members:
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non experts the case of two snip versions"
    - "identifying research fields within business and management a journal cross citation analysis"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "aggregated journal journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks maps and interactive overlays"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "a systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"):
  with members:
    - "a sensitivity analysis of researchers productivity rankings to the time of citation observation"
    - "the precision of the arithmetic mean geometric mean and percentiles for citation data an experimental simulation modelling approach"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"
    - "measuring academic influence not all citations are equal"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non experts the case of two snip versions"
    - "methods for estimating the size of google scholar"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"):
  with members:
    - "identifying research fields within business and management a journal cross citation analysis"
    - "patents as instruments for exploring innovation dynamics geographic and technological perspectives on photovoltaic cells"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "a systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators"
    - "which percentile based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values an empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation rank approach p100"
    - "the revised snip indicator of elsevier s scopus"
    - "interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal journal citations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "field normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method"):
  with members:
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research"
    - "on the calculation of percentile based bibliometric indicators"
    - "the leiden ranking 2011 2012 data collection indicators and interpretation"
    - "an empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "identifying research fields within business and management a journal cross citation analysis"):
  with members:
    - "some modifications to the snip journal impact indicator"
    - "how journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research a comparison between innovation studies and business management"
    - "cwts crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group s publication oeuvre"
    - "rivals for the crown reply to opthof and leydesdorff"
    - "measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals"
    - "can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal journal citation relations using the journal citation reports"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non experts the case of two snip versions"):
  with members:
    - "some modifications to the snip journal impact indicator"
    - "fractional counting of citations in research evaluation a cross and interdisciplinary assessment of the tsinghua university in beijing"
    - "measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)