human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks"
  Abstract: The ability to activate and manage effective collaborations is becoming an increasingly important criteria in policies on academic career advancement. The rise of such policies leads to development of indicators that permit measurement of the propensity to collaborate for academics of different ranks, and to examine the role of several variables in collaboration, first among these being the researchers' disciplines. In this work we apply an innovative bibliometric approach based on individual propensity for collaboration to measure the differences in propensity across academic ranks, by discipline and for choice of collaboration forms--intramural, extramural domestic and international. The analysis is based on the scientific production of Italian academics for the period 2006---2010, totaling over 200,000 publications indexed in Web of Science. It shows that assistant professors register a propensity for intramural collaboration that is clearly greater than for professors of higher ranks. Vice versa, the higher ranks, but not quite so clearly, register greater propensity to collaborate at the international level.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output"):
  with members:
    - "diversification versus specialization in scientific research which strategy pays off"
    - "the effects of gender age and academic rank on research diversification"
    - "the effect of multidisciplinary collaborations on research diversification"
    - "do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science"
    - "specialization versus diversification in research activities the extent intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists"
    - "the relationship among research productivity research collaboration and their determinants"
    - "does your surname affect the citability of your publications"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the collaboration behavior of top scientists"):
  with members:
    - "measuring science irresistible temptations easy shortcuts and dangerous consequences"
    - "revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement"
    - "the relationship among research productivity research collaboration and their determinants"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "individual research performance a proposal for comparing apples to oranges"
    - "the collaboration behaviors of scientists in italy a field level analysis"
    - "gender differences in research collaboration"
    - "are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers an investigation on the italian university system"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a gender analysis of top scientists collaboration behavior evidence from italy"):
  with members:
    - "the collaboration behavior of top scientists"
    - "gender differences in scientific collaborations women are more egalitarian than men"
    - "the relationship among research productivity research collaboration and their determinants"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "the collaboration behaviors of scientists in italy a field level analysis"
    - "gender differences in research collaboration"
    - "are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers an investigation on the italian university system"
    - "a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large scale research assessments"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the relationship among research productivity research collaboration and their determinants"):
  with members:
    - "the combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "the collaboration behaviors of scientists in italy a field level analysis"
    - "gender differences in research collaboration"
    - "what is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance"
    - "a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large scale research assessments"
    - "research productivity are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones"
    - "the relationship between scientists research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors"):
  with members:
    - "measuring science irresistible temptations easy shortcuts and dangerous consequences"
    - "variability of research performance across disciplines within universities in non competitive higher education systems"
    - "career advancement and scientific performance in universities"
    - "individual research performance a proposal for comparing apples to oranges"
    - "what is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance"
    - "how important is choice of the scaling factor in standardizing citations"
    - "a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large scale research assessments"
    - "research productivity are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the specific shapes of gender imbalance in scientific authorships a network approach"):
  with members:
    - "should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "gender differences in research collaboration"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)