human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a framework for dependent types and effects"
  Abstract: We generalise Levy's call-by-push-value (CBPV) to dependent type theory, to gain a better understanding of how to combine dependent types with effects. We define a dependently typed extension of CBPV, dCBPV-, and show that it has a very natural small-step operational semantics, which satisfies subject reduction and (depending on the effects present) determinism and strong normalization, and an elegant categorical semantics, which - surprisingly - is no more complicated than the simply typed semantics. #R##N#We have full and faithful translations from a dependently typed version of Moggi's monadic metalanguage and of a call-by-name (CBN) dependent type theory into dCBPV- which give rise to the expected operational behaviour. However, it turns out that dCBPV- does not suffice to encode call-by-value (CBV) dependent type theory or the strong (dependent) elimination rules for positive connectives in CBN-dependent type theory. #R##N#To mend this problem, we discuss a second, more expressive system dCBPV+, which additionally has a principle of Kleisli extension for dependent functions. We obtain the desired CBV- and CBN-translations of dependent type theory into dCBPV+. It too has a natural categorical semantics and operational semantics. However, depending on the effects we consider, we may lose uniqueness of typing, as the type of a computation may become more specified as certain effects are executed. This idea can be neatly formalized using a notion of subtyping. #R##N#We hope that the theoretical framework of this paper on the one hand provides at least a partial answer to the fundamental type theoretic question of how one can understand the relationship between computational effects and dependent types. On the other hand, we hope it can contribute a small-step towards the ultimate goal of an elegant fully fledged language for certified effectful programming.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "an effectful treatment of dependent types"):
  with members:
    - "syntax and semantics of linear dependent types"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)