human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "adversarial detection of flash malware limitations and open issues"
  Abstract: During the past two years, Flash malware has become one of the most insidious threats to detect, with almost 600 critical vulnerabilities targeting Adobe Flash Player disclosed in the wild. Research has shown that machine learning can be successfully used to tackle this increasing variability and sophistication of Flash malware, by simply leveraging static analysis to extract information from the structure of the file or from its bytecode. However, the robustness of such systems against well-crafted evasion attempts - also known as adversarial examples - has never been investigated. In this paper, we first discuss how to craft adversarial Flash malware examples, and show that it suffices to only slightly manipulate them to evade detection. We then empirically demonstrate that popular defense techniques proposed to mitigate such threat, including re-training on adversarial examples, may not always be effective. We argue that this occurs when the feature vectors extracted from adversarial examples become indistinguishable from those of benign data, meaning that the given feature representation is intrinsically vulnerable. In this respect, we are the first to formally define and quantitatively characterize this vulnerability, highlighting when an attack can be countered by solely improving the security of the learning algorithm, or when it requires also considering additional features. We conclude the paper by suggesting alternative research directions to improve the security of learning-based Flash malware detectors.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "automatic generation of adversarial examples for interpreting malware classifiers"):
  with members:
    - "understanding the efficacy reliability and resiliency of computer vision techniques for malware detection and future research directions"
    - "atmpa attacking machine learning based malware visualization detection methods via adversarial examples"
    - "on defending against label flipping attacks on malware detection systems"
    - "adversarial samples on android malware detection systems for iot systems"
    - "copycat practical adversarial attacks on visualization based malware detection"
    - "generation evaluation of adversarial examples for malware obfuscation"
    - "examining adversarial learning against graph based iot malware detection systems"
    - "explaining vulnerabilities of deep learning to adversarial malware binaries"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the naked sun malicious cooperation between benign looking processes"):
  with members:
    - "poisoning behavioral malware clustering"
    - "black box attacks against rnn based malware detection algorithms"
    - "adversarial examples are not easily detected bypassing ten detection methods"
    - "yes machine learning can be more secure a case study on android malware detection"
    - "hardening classifiers against evasion the good the bad and the ugly"
    - "generating adversarial malware examples for black box attacks based on gan"
    - "the limitations of deep learning in adversarial settings"
    - "evasion attacks against machine learning at test time"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "adversarial malware binaries evading deep learning for malware detection in executables"):
  with members:
    - "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning"
    - "deceiving end to end deep learning malware detectors using adversarial examples"
    - "yes machine learning can be more secure a case study on android malware detection"
    - "hardening classifiers against evasion the good the bad and the ugly"
    - "language modeling with gated convolutional networks"
    - "the mythos of model interpretability"
    - "reducing overfitting in deep networks by decorrelating representations"
    - "evasion attacks against machine learning at test time"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)