human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "group testing with probabilistic tests theory design and application"
  Abstract: Identification of defective members of large populations has been widely studied in the statistics community under the name of group testing. It involves grouping subsets of items into different pools and detecting defective members based on the set of test results obtained for each pool. In a classical noiseless group testing setup, it is assumed that the sampling procedure is fully known to the reconstruction algorithm, in the sense that the existence of a defective member in a pool results in the test outcome of that pool to be positive. However, this may not be always a valid assumption in some cases of interest. In particular, we consider the case where the defective items in a pool can become independently inactive with a certain probability. Hence, one may obtain a negative test result in a pool despite containing some defective items. As a result, any sampling and reconstruction method should be able to cope with two different types of uncertainty, i.e., the unknown set of defective items and the partially unknown, probabilistic testing procedure. In this work, motivated by the application of detecting infected people in viral epidemics, we design nonadaptive sampling procedures that allow successful identification of the defective items through a set of probabilistic tests. Our design requires only a small number of tests to single out the defective items. In particular, for a population of size N and at most K defective items with activation probability p, our results show that M = O(K2 log (N/K)/p3) tests is sufficient if the sampling procedure should work for all possible sets of defective items, while M = O(K log (N)/p3) tests is enough to be successful for any single set of defective items. Moreover, we show that the defective members can be recovered using a simple reconstruction algorithm with complexity of O(MN).

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the all or nothing behavior of bernoulli group testing"):
  with members:
    - "optimal non adaptive group testing"
    - "group testing an information theory perspective"
    - "performance of group testing algorithms with near constant tests per item"
    - "information theoretic and algorithmic thresholds for group testing"
    - "near optimal noisy group testing via separate decoding of items"
    - "the capacity of bernoulli nonadaptive group testing"
    - "saffron a fast efficient and robust framework for group testing based on sparse graph codes"
    - "group testing algorithms bounds and simulations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sublinear time non adaptive group testing with o k log n tests via bit mixing coding"):
  with members:
    - "optimal non adaptive group testing"
    - "group testing an information theory perspective"
    - "simple codes and sparse recovery with fast decoding"
    - "performance of group testing algorithms with near constant tests per item"
    - "information theoretic and algorithmic thresholds for group testing"
    - "cross sender bit mixing coding"
    - "on the optimality of the kautz singleton construction in probabilistic group testing"
    - "near optimal noisy group testing via separate decoding of items"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "cross sender bit mixing coding"):
  with members:
    - "non adaptive group testing framework based on concatenation code"
    - "group testing using left and right regular sparse graph codes"
    - "nonadaptive group testing with random set of defectives"
    - "group testing schemes from codes and designs"
    - "saffron a fast efficient and robust framework for group testing based on sparse graph codes"
    - "computing in additive networks with bounded information codes"
    - "group testing algorithms bounds and simulations"
    - "on almost disjunct matrices for group testing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "parity queries for binary classification"):
  with members:
    - "unequal error protection querying policies for the noisy 20 questions problem"
    - "community recovery in hypergraphs"
    - "predicting positive and negative links with noisy queries theory practice"
    - "fundamental limits on data acquisition trade offs between sample complexity and query difficulty"
    - "the set of solutions of random xorsat formulae"
    - "information recovery from pairwise measurements"
    - "decoding binary node labels from censored edge measurements phase transition and efficient recovery"
    - "boolean compressed sensing and noisy group testing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "nearly optimal sparse group testing"):
  with members:
    - "performance of group testing algorithms with near constant tests per item"
    - "novel impossibility results for group testing"
    - "near optimal noisy group testing via separate decoding of items"
    - "individual testing is optimal for nonadaptive group testing in the linear regime"
    - "improved group testing rates with constant column weight designs"
    - "nonadaptive group testing with random set of defectives"
    - "limits on support recovery with probabilistic models an information theoretic framework"
    - "group testing schemes from codes and designs"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "conscious and controlling elements in combinatorial group testing problems"):
  with members:
    - "combinatorial pair testing distinguishing workers from slackers"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "smart elements in combinatorial group testing problems"):
  with members:
    - "combinatorial pair testing distinguishing workers from slackers"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "asymptotics of fingerprinting and group testing capacity achieving log likelihood decoders"):
  with members:
    - "asymptotics of fingerprinting and group testing tight bounds from channel capacities"
    - "optimal symmetric tardos traitor tracing schemes"
    - "capacities and capacity achieving decoders for various fingerprinting games"
    - "enhanced blind decoding of tardos codes with new map based functions"
    - "dynamic traitor tracing schemes revisited"
    - "discrete distributions in the tardos scheme revisited"
    - "efficient probabilistic group testing based on traitor tracing"
    - "dynamic tardos traitor tracing schemes"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)