human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "approximating the optimal competitive ratio for an ancient online scheduling problem"
  Abstract: We consider the classical online scheduling problem P||C_{max} in which jobs are released over list and provide a nearly optimal online algorithm. More precisely, an online algorithm whose competitive ratio is at most (1+\epsilon) times that of an optimal online algorithm could be achieved in polynomial time, where m, the number of machines, is a part of the input. It substantially improves upon the previous results by almost closing the gap between the currently best known lower bound of 1.88 (Rudin, Ph.D thesis, 2001) and the best known upper bound of 1.92 (Fleischer, Wahl, Journal of Scheduling, 2000). It has been known by folklore that an online problem could be viewed as a game between an adversary and the online player. Our approach extensively explores such a structure and builds up a completely new framework to show that, for the online over list scheduling problem, given any \epsilon>0, there exists a uniform threshold K which is polynomial in m such that if the competitive ratio of an online algorithm is \rho<=2, then there exists a list of at most K jobs to enforce the online algorithm to achieve a competitive ratio of at least \rho-O(\epsilon). Our approach is substantially different from that of Gunther et al. (Gunther et al., SODA 2013), in which an approximation scheme for online over time scheduling problems is given, where the number of machines is fixed. Our method could also be extended to several related online over list scheduling models.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "competitive ratio approximation schemes for minimizing the makespan in the online list model"):
  with members:
    - "a new approach to online scheduling approximating the optimal competitive ratio"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)