human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators"
  Abstract: We address the question how citation-based bibliometric indicators can best be normalized to ensure fair comparisons between publications from different scientific fields and different years. In a systematic large-scale empirical analysis, we compare a traditional normalization approach based on a field classification system with three source normalization approaches. We pay special attention to the selection of the publications included in the analysis. Publications in national scientific journals, popular scientific magazines, and trade magazines are not included. Unlike earlier studies, we use algorithmically constructed classification systems to evaluate the different normalization approaches. Our analysis shows that a source normalization approach based on the recently introduced idea of fractional citation counting does not perform well. Two other source normalization approaches generally outperform the classification-system-based normalization approach that we study. Our analysis therefore offers considerable support for the use of source-normalized bibliometric indicators.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators"):
  with members:
    - "which differences can be expected when two universities in the leiden ranking are compared some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations"
    - "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"
    - "revisiting relative indicators and provisional truths"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "how are excellent highly cited papers defined in bibliometrics a quantitative analysis of the literature"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "should citations be field normalized in evaluative bibliometrics an empirical analysis based on propensity score matching"):
  with members:
    - "the preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration"
    - "the geography of references in elite articles which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge"
    - "field normalization of scientometric indicators"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "validity of basing authors publication strategy on journal impact factors"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "like for like bibliometric substitutes for peer review advantages and limits of indicators calculated from the ep index"):
  with members:
    - "technological research in the eu is less efficient than the world average eu research policy risks europeans future"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "which percentile based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values an empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation rank approach p100"
    - "on the calculation of percentile based bibliometric indicators"
    - "the use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data opportunities and limits"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators"):
  with members:
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "citation analysis with microsoft academic"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a comparison of university performance scores and ranks by mncs and fss"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "quality versus quantity in scientific impact"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "critical rationalism and the search for standard field normalized indicators in bibliometrics"):
  with members:
    - "algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations an empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting"
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "how are excellent highly cited papers defined in bibliometrics a quantitative analysis of the literature"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "alternative metrics in scientometrics a meta analysis of research into three altmetrics"
    - "measuring impact in research evaluations a thorough discussion of methods for effects of and problems with impact measurements"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a framework for the measurement and prediction of an individual scientist s performance"):
  with members:
    - "restricting the h index to a publication and citation time window a case study of a timed hirsch index"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "how to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully a proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations"
    - "individual research performance a proposal for comparing apples to oranges"
    - "the inconsistency of the h index"
    - "assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"):
  with members:
    - "validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact a study using data from altmetric and f1000prime"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "the wisdom of citing scientists"
    - "the use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data opportunities and limits"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"
    - "towards a new crown indicator an empirical analysis"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts"):
  with members:
    - "using network science and text analytics to produce surveys in a scientific topic"
    - "authorship recognition via fluctuation analysis of network topology and word intermittency"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "restricting the h index to a publication and citation time window a case study of a timed hirsch index"
    - "a recursive field normalized bibliometric performance indicator an application to the field of library and information science"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)