human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "continuous integration delivery and deployment a systematic review on approaches tools challenges and practices"
  Abstract: Continuous practices, i.e., continuous integration, delivery, and deployment, are the software development industry practices that enable organizations to frequently and reliably release new features and products. With the increasing interest in the literature on continuous practices, it is important to systematically review and synthesize the approaches, tools, challenges, and practices reported for adopting and implementing continuous practices. This paper aimed at systematically reviewing the state of the art of continuous practices to classify approaches and tools, identify challenges and practices in this regard, and identify the gaps for future research. We used the systematic literature review method for reviewing the peer-reviewed papers on continuous practices published between 2004 and June 1, 2016. We applied the thematic analysis method for analyzing the data extracted from reviewing 69 papers selected using predefined criteria. We have identified 30 approaches and associated tools, which facilitate the implementation of continuous practices in the following ways: 1) reducing build and test time in continuous integration (CI); 2) increasing visibility and awareness on build and test results in CI; 3) supporting (semi-) automated continuous testing; 4) detecting violations, flaws, and faults in CI; 5) addressing security and scalability issues in deployment pipeline; and 6) improving dependability and reliability of deployment process. We have also determined a list of critical factors, such as testing (effort and time), team awareness and transparency, good design principles, customer, highly skilled and motivated team, application domain, and appropriate infrastructure that should be carefully considered when introducing continuous practices in a given organization. The majority of the reviewed papers were validation (34.7%) and evaluation (36.2%) research types. This paper also reveals that continuous practices have been successfully applied to both greenfield and maintenance projects. Continuous practices have become an important area of software engineering research and practice. While the reported approaches, tools, and practices are addressing a wide range of challenges, there are several challenges and gaps, which require future research work for improving the capturing and reporting of contextual information in the studies reporting different aspects of continuous practices; gaining a deep understanding of how software-intensive systems should be (re-) architected to support continuous practices; and addressing the lack of knowledge and tools for engineering processes of designing and running secure deployment pipelines.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the role of software architecture in devops transformation an industrial case study"):
  with members:
    - "a survey of devops concepts and challenges"
    - "devops capabilities practices and challenges insights from a case study"
    - "key stakeholders value propositions for feature selection in software intensive products an industrial case study"
    - "an empirical study of architecting for continuous delivery and deployment"
    - "report from gi dagstuhl seminar 16394 software performance engineering in the devops world"
    - "the making of cloud applications an empirical study on software development for the cloud"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "testing and verification of neural network based safety critical control software a systematic literature review"):
  with members:
    - "visual analytics in deep learning an interrogative survey for the next frontiers"
    - "local rule based explanations of black box decision systems"
    - "deepgauge multi granularity testing criteria for deep learning systems"
    - "experimental resilience assessment of an open source driving agent"
    - "interpreting deep classifier by visual distillation of dark knowledge"
    - "dlfuzz differential fuzzing testing of deep learning systems"
    - "software engineering challenges of deep learning"
    - "feature squeezing detecting adversarial examples in deep neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the dynamics of software composition analysis"):
  with members:
    - "a practical approach to the automatic classification of security relevant commits"
    - "beyond metadata code centric and usage based analysis of known vulnerabilities in open source software"
    - "on the impact of micro packages an empirical study of the npm javascript ecosystem"
    - "thou shalt not depend on me analysing the use of outdated javascript libraries on the web"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "an empirical study of architecting for continuous delivery and deployment"):
  with members:
    - "report from gi dagstuhl seminar 16394 software performance engineering in the devops world"
    - "microservices yesterday today and tomorrow"
    - "the making of cloud applications an empirical study on software development for the cloud"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)