human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "top n recommendations from expressive recommender systems"
  Abstract: Normalized nonnegative models assign probability distributions to users and random variables to items; see [Stark, 2015]. Rating an item is regarded as sampling the random variable assigned to the item with respect to the distribution assigned to the user who rates the item. Models of that kind are highly expressive. For instance, using normalized nonnegative models we can understand users' preferences as mixtures of interpretable user stereotypes, and we can arrange properties of users and items in a hierarchical manner. These features would not be useful if the predictive power of normalized nonnegative models was poor. Thus, we analyze here the performance of normalized nonnegative models for top-N recommendation and observe that their performance matches the performance of methods like PureSVD which was introduced in [Cremonesi et al., 2010]. We conclude that normalized nonnegative models not only provide accurate recommendations but they also deliver (for free) representations that are interpretable. We deepen the discussion of normalized nonnegative models by providing further theoretical insights. In particular, we introduce total variational distance as an operational similarity measure, we discover scenarios where normalized nonnegative models yield unique representations of users and items, we prove that the inference of optimal normalized nonnegative models is NP-hard and finally, we discuss the relationship between normalized nonnegative models and nonnegative matrix factorization.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "recommender systems inspired by the structure of quantum theory"):
  with members:
    - "expressive recommender systems through normalized nonnegative models"
    - "some upper and lower bounds on psd rank"
    - "probabilistic latent semantic analysis"
    - "concepts and their dynamics a quantum theoretic modeling of human thought"
    - "bpr bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback"
    - "multi label prediction via compressed sensing"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)