human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "nonclassical polynomials as a barrier to polynomial lower bounds"
  Abstract: The problem of constructing explicit functions which cannot be approximated by low degree polynomials has been extensively studied in computational complexity, motivated by applications in circuit lower bounds, pseudo-randomness, constructions of Ramsey graphs and locally decodable codes. Still, most of the known lower bounds become trivial for polynomials of super-logarithmic degree. Here, we suggest a new barrier explaining this phenomenon. We show that many of the existing lower bound proof techniques extend to nonclassical polynomials, an extension of classical polynomials which arose in higher order Fourier analysis. Moreover, these techniques are tight for nonclassical polynomials of logarithmic degree.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "torus polynomials an algebraic approach to acc lower bounds"):
  with members:
    - "every locally characterized affine invariant property is testable"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on polynomial approximations over mathbb z 2 k mathbb z"):
  with members:
    - "new algorithms and lower bounds for circuits with linear threshold gates"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "optimal sparsification for some binary csps using low degree polynomials"):
  with members:
    - "optimal data reduction for graph coloring using low degree polynomials"
    - "best case and worst case sparsifiability of boolean csps"
    - "kernelization of constraint satisfaction problems a study through universal algebra"
    - "complexity and approximability of parameterized max csps"
    - "sparsification upper and lower bounds for graph problems and not all equal sat"
    - "on sparsification for computing treewidth"
    - "kernelization lower bounds by cross composition"
    - "constraint satisfaction parameterized by solution size"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)