human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "near optimal hardness results for signaling in bayesian games"
  Abstract: We study the optimization problem faced by a perfectly informed principal in a Bayesian game, who reveals information to the players about the state of nature to obtain a desirable equilibrium. This signaling problem is the natural design question motivated by uncertainty in games and has attracted much recent attention. We present almost-optimal hardness results for signaling problems in (a) Bayesian two-player zero-sum games, and (b) Bayesian network routing games. #R##N#For Bayesian zero-sum games, when the principal seeks to maximize the equilibrium utility of a player, we show that it is \nphard to obtain an FPTAS. Previous results ruled out an FPTAS assuming the hardness of the planted clique problem, which is an average-case assumption about the hardness of recovering a planted clique from an Erd\"os-R\'enyi random graph. Our hardness proof exploits duality and the equivalence of separation and optimization in a novel, unconventional way. Further, we preclude a PTAS assuming planted-clique hardness; previously, a PTAS was ruled out (assuming planted-clique hardness) only for games with quasi-polynomial-size strategy sets. Complementing these, we obtain a PTAS for a structured class of zero-sum games (where signaling is still NP-hard) when the payoff matrices obey a Lipschitz condition. #R##N#For Bayesian network routing games, wherein the principal seeks to minimize the average latency of the Nash flow, NP-hard to obtain an approximation ratio better than 4/3, even for linear latency functions. This is the optimal inapproximability result for linear latencies, since we show that full revelation achieves a 4/3-approximation for linear latencies.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "settling the complexity of computing approximate two player nash equilibria"):
  with members:
    - "almost polynomial ratio eth hardness of approximating densest k subgraph"
    - "detecting communities is hard and counting them is even harder"
    - "approximating nash equilibria in tree polymatrix games"
    - "the query complexity of correlated equilibria"
    - "communication complexity of approximate nash equilibria"
    - "inapproximability results for approximate nash equilibria"
    - "well supported versus approximate nash equilibria query complexity of large games"
    - "eth hardness for densest k subgraph with perfect completeness"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)