human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "strict self assembly of fractals using multiple hands"
  Abstract: In this paper we consider the problem of the strict self-assembly of infinite fractals within tile self-assembly. In particular, we provide tile assembly algorithms for the assembly of the discrete Sierpinski triangle and the discrete Sierpinski carpet within a class of models we term the \emph{$h$-handed assembly model} ($h$-HAM), which generalizes the 2-HAM to allow up to $h$ assemblies to combine in a single assembly step. Despite substantial consideration, no purely growth self-assembly model has yet been shown to strictly assemble an infinite fractal without significant modification to the fractal shape. In this paper we not only achieve this, but in the case of the Sierpinski carpet are able to achieve it within the 2-HAM, one of the most well studied tile assembly models in the literature. Our specific results are as follows. We provide a $6$-HAM construction for the Sierpinski triangle that works at scale factor 1, 30 tile types, and assembles the fractal in a \emph{near perfect} way in which all intermediate assemblies are finite-sized iterations of the recursive fractal. We further assemble the Sierpinski triangle within the $3$-HAM at scale factor 3 and 990 tile types. For the Sierpinski carpet, we present a $2$-HAM result that works at scale factor 3 and uses 1,216 tile types. We further include analysis showing that the aTAM is incapable of strictly assembling the non-tree Sierpinski triangle considered in this paper, and that multiple hands are needed for the near-perfect assembly of the Sierpinski triangle and the Sierpinski carpet.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hierarchical growth is necessary and sometimes sufficient to self assemble discrete self similar fractals"):
  with members:
    - "self assembly of 4 sided fractals in the two handed tile assembly model"
    - "hierarchical self assembly of fractals with signal passing tiles extended abstract"
    - "hierarchical self assembly of fractals with signal passing tiles"
    - "scaled tree fractals do not strictly self assemble"
    - "parallelism and time in hierarchical self assembly"
    - "approximate self assembly of the sierpinski triangle"
    - "strict self assembly of discrete sierpinski triangles"
    - "self assembly of the discrete sierpinski carpet and related fractals"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "self assembly of 4 sided fractals in the two handed tile assembly model"):
  with members:
    - "hierarchical growth is necessary and sometimes sufficient to self assemble discrete self similar fractals"
    - "the non cooperative tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal or capable of bounded turing machine simulation"
    - "universal simulation of directed systems in the abstract tile assembly model requires undirectedness"
    - "hierarchical self assembly of fractals with signal passing tiles extended abstract"
    - "hierarchical self assembly of fractals with signal passing tiles"
    - "self assembly of shapes at constant scale using repulsive forces"
    - "universal shape replicators via self assembly with attractive and repulsive forces"
    - "the simulation powers and limitations of higher temperature hierarchical self assembly systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "hierarchical self assembly of fractals with signal passing tiles"):
  with members:
    - "self assembly of 4 sided fractals in the two handed tile assembly model"
    - "hierarchical self assembly of fractals with signal passing tiles extended abstract"
    - "replication of arbitrary hole free shapes via self assembly with signal passing tiles extended abstract"
    - "scaled tree fractals do not strictly self assemble"
    - "signal transmission across tile assemblies 3d static tiles simulate active self assembly by 2d signal passing tiles"
    - "asynchronous signal passing for tile self assembly fuel efficient computation and efficient assembly of shapes"
    - "two hands are better than one up to constant factors"
    - "approximate self assembly of the sierpinski triangle"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CG(Computational Geometry)