human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "finite state dimension and lossy decompressors"
  Abstract: This paper examines information-theoretic questions regarding the difficulty of compressing data versus the difficulty of decompressing data and the role that information loss plays in this interaction. Finite-state compression and decompression are shown to be of equivalent difficulty, even when the decompressors are allowed to be lossy.#R##N#Inspired by Kolmogorov complexity, this paper defines the optimal *decompression *ratio achievable on an infinite sequence by finite-state decompressors (that is, finite-state transducers outputting the sequence in question). It is shown that the optimal compression ratio achievable on a sequence S by any *information lossless* finite state compressor, known as the finite-state dimension of S, is equal to the optimal decompression ratio achievable on S by any finite-state decompressor. This result implies a new decompression characterization of finite-state dimension in terms of lossy finite-state transducers.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bounded pushdown dimension vs lempel ziv information density"):
  with members:
    - "polylog space compression pushdown compression and lempel ziv are incomparable"
    - "dimension in complexity classes"
    - "the dimensions of individual strings and sequences"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "dimension extractors and optimal decompression"):
  with members:
    - "every sequence is decompressible from a random one"
    - "effective strong dimension algorithmic information and computational complexity"
    - "gales suffice for constructive dimension"
    - "dimension in complexity classes"
    - "the dimensions of individual strings and sequences"
    - "gales and supergales are equivalent for defining constructive hausdorff dimension"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)