human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "self tuned visual subclass learning with shared samples an incremental approach"
  Abstract: Computer vision tasks are traditionally defined and evaluated using semantic categories. However, it is known to the field that semantic classes do not necessarily correspond to a unique visual class (e.g. inside and outside of a car). Furthermore, many of the feasible learning techniques at hand cannot model a visual class which appears consistent to the human eye. These problems have motivated the use of 1) Unsupervised or supervised clustering as a preprocessing step to identify the visual subclasses to be used in a mixture-of-experts learning regime. 2) Felzenszwalb et al. part model and other works model mixture assignment with latent variables which is optimized during learning 3) Highly non-linear classifiers which are inherently capable of modelling multi-modal input space but are inefficient at the test time. In this work, we promote an incremental view over the recognition of semantic classes with varied appearances. We propose an optimization technique which incrementally finds maximal visual subclasses in a regularized risk minimization framework. Our proposed approach unifies the clustering and classification steps in a single algorithm. The importance of this approach is its compliance with the classification via the fact that it does not need to know about the number of clusters, the representation and similarity measures used in pre-processing clustering methods a priori. Following this approach we show both qualitatively and quantitatively significant results. We show that the visual subclasses demonstrate a long tail distribution. Finally, we show that state of the art object detection methods (e.g. DPM) are unable to use the tails of this distribution comprising 50% of the training samples. In fact we show that DPM performance slightly increases on average by the removal of this half of the data.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)