human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the impact of technical domain expertise on search behavior and task outcome"
  Abstract: Domain expertise is regarded as one of the key factors impacting search success: experts are known to write more effective queries, to select the right results on the result page, and to find answers satisfying their information needs. Search transaction logs play the crucial role in the result ranking. Yet despite the variety in expertise levels of users, all prior interactions are treated alike, suggesting that weighting in expertise can improve the ranking for informational tasks. The main aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of high levels of technical domain expertise on both search behavior and task outcome. We conduct an online user study with searchers proficient in programming languages. We focus on Java and Javascript, yet we believe that our study and results are applicable for other expertise-sensitive search tasks. The main findings are three-fold: First, we constructed expertise tests that effectively measure technical domain expertise and correlate well with the self-reported expertise. Second, we showed that there is a clear position bias, but technical domain experts were less affected by position bias. Third, we found that general expertise helped finding the correct answers, but the domain experts were more successful as they managed to detect better answers. Our work is using explicit tests to determine user expertise levels, which is an important step toward fully automatic detection of expertise levels based on interaction behavior. A deeper understanding of the impact of expertise on search behavior and task outcome can enable more effective use of expert behavior in search logs - essentially make everyone search as an expert.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "evaluating personal assistants on mobile devices"):
  with members:
    - "a neural conversational model"
    - "show and tell a neural image caption generator"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)