human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "accountability of ai under the law the role of explanation"
  Abstract: The ubiquity of systems using artificial intelligence or "AI" has brought increasing attention to how those systems should be regulated. The choice of how to regulate AI systems will require care. AI systems have the potential to synthesize large amounts of data, allowing for greater levels of personalization and precision than ever before|applications range from clinical decision support to autonomous driving and predictive policing. That said, common sense reasoning [McCarthy, 1960] remains one of the holy grails of AI, and there exist legitimate concerns about the intentional and unintentional negative consequences of AI systems [Bostrom, 2003, Amodei et al., 2016, Sculley et al., 2014].#R##N##R##N#There are many ways to hold AI systems accountable. In this work, we focus on one: explanation. Questions about a legal right to explanation from AI systems was recently debated in the EU General Data Protection Regulation [Goodman and Flaxman, 2016, Wachter et al., 2017], and thus thinking carefully about when and how explanation from AI systems might improve accountability is timely. Good choices about when to demand explanation can help prevent negative consequences from AI systems, while poor choices may not only fail to hold AI systems accountable but also hamper the development of much-needed beneficial AI systems.#R##N##R##N#Below, we briefly review current societal, moral, and legal norms around explanation, and then focus on the different contexts under which explanation is currently required under the law. We find that there exists great variation around when explanation is demanded, but there also exists important consistencies: when demanding explanation from humans, what we typically want to know is how and whether certain input factors affected the final decision or outcome.#R##N##R##N#These consistencies allow us to list the technical considerations that must be considered if we desired AI systems that could provide kinds of explanations that are currently required of humans under the law. Contrary to popular wisdom of AI systems as indecipherable black boxes, we find that this level of explanation should often be technically feasible but may sometimes be practically onerous|there are certain aspects of explanation that may be simple for humans to provide but challenging for AI systems, and vice versa. As an interdisciplinary team of legal scholars, computer scientists, and cognitive scientists, we recommend that for the present, AI systems can and should be held to a similar standard of explanation as humans currently are; in the future we may wish to hold an AI to a different standard.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sam the sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters"):
  with members:
    - "interpretable and fine grained visual explanations for convolutional neural networks"
    - "towards explainable artificial intelligence"
    - "visualizing deep networks by optimizing with integrated gradients"
    - "removing input features via a generative model to explain their attributions to classifier s decisions"
    - "methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks"
    - "understanding deep architectures by visual summaries"
    - "interpreting and explaining deep neural networks for classification of audio signals"
    - "explaining image classifiers by counterfactual generation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "flexible and context specific ai explainability a multidisciplinary approach"):
  with members:
    - "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization"
    - "functional transparency for structured data a game theoretic approach"
    - "towards robust locally linear deep networks"
    - "explaining a black box by using a deep variational information bottleneck approach"
    - "learning a sat solver from single bit supervision"
    - "safely entering the deep a review of verification and validation for machine learning and a challenge elicitation in the automotive industry"
    - "contextual explanation networks"
    - "smoothgrad removing noise by adding noise"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "foundations of explainable knowledge enabled systems"):
  with members:
    - "one explanation does not fit all a toolkit and taxonomy of ai explainability techniques"
    - "explaining explanations in ai"
    - "knowledge integration for disease characterization a breast cancer example"
    - "causal learning and explanation of deep neural networks via autoencoded activations"
    - "ai fairness 360 an extensible toolkit for detecting understanding and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias"
    - "network dissection quantifying interpretability of deep visual representations"
    - "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences"
    - "interpreting deep visual representations via network dissection"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "directions for explainable knowledge enabled systems"):
  with members:
    - "explaining explanations in ai"
    - "explaining explanations an overview of interpretability of machine learning"
    - "blockchain and artificial intelligence"
    - "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences"
    - "what does explainable ai really mean a new conceptualization of perspectives"
    - "the blockchain a new framework for robotic swarm systems"
    - "the mythos of model interpretability"
    - "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "evidence based explanation to promote fairness in ai systems"):
  with members:
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "explaining models an empirical study of how explanations impact fairness judgment"
    - "ai fairness 360 an extensible toolkit for detecting understanding and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias"
    - "fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high stakes public sector decision making"
    - "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "explanation in human ai systems a literature meta review synopsis of key ideas and publications and bibliography for explainable ai"):
  with members:
    - "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization"
    - "ted teaching ai to explain its decisions"
    - "explaining explanations an overview of interpretability of machine learning"
    - "deep learning a critical appraisal"
    - "how do humans understand explanations from machine learning systems an evaluation of the human interpretability of explanation"
    - "explainable artificial intelligence xai the goodness criteria and the grasp ability test"
    - "interpretable explorable approximations of black box models"
    - "explaining the unexplained a class enhanced attentive response clear approach to understanding deep neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety"):
  with members:
    - "a roadmap toward the resilient internet of things for cyber physical systems"
    - "a grounded interaction protocol for explainable artificial intelligence"
    - "automated rationale generation a technique for explainable ai and its effects on human perceptions"
    - "model cards for model reporting"
    - "a framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning"
    - "spectrum data poisoning with adversarial deep learning"
    - "explaining explanations in ai"
    - "problem formulation and fairness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "modularized textual grounding for counterfactual resilience"):
  with members:
    - "weakly supervised attention learning for textual phrases grounding"
    - "interpretable and globally optimal prediction for textual grounding using image concepts"
    - "w talc weakly supervised temporal activity localization and classification"
    - "mattnet modular attention network for referring expression comprehension"
    - "explanations based on the missing towards contrastive explanations with pertinent negatives"
    - "generating counterfactual explanations with natural language"
    - "exploring the limits of weakly supervised pretraining"
    - "unsupervised textual grounding linking words to image concepts"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)