human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on the effective measure of dimension in the analysis cosparse model"
  Abstract: Many applications have benefited remarkably from low-dimensional models in the recent decade. The fact that many signals, though high dimensional, are intrinsically low dimensional has given the possibility to recover them stably from a relatively small number of their measurements. For example, in compressed sensing with the standard (synthesis) sparsity prior and in matrix completion, the number of measurements needed is proportional (up to a logarithmic factor) to the signal's manifold dimension. #R##N#Recently, a new natural low-dimensional signal model has been proposed: the cosparse analysis prior. In the noiseless case, it is possible to recover signals from this model, using a combinatorial search, from a number of measurements proportional to the signal's manifold dimension. However, if we ask for stability to noise or an efficient (polynomial complexity) solver, all the existing results demand a number of measurements which is far removed from the manifold dimension, sometimes far greater. Thus, it is natural to ask whether this gap is a deficiency of the theory and the solvers, or if there exists a real barrier in recovering the cosparse signals by relying only on their manifold dimension. Is there an algorithm which, in the presence of noise, can accurately recover a cosparse signal from a number of measurements proportional to the manifold dimension? In this work, we prove that there is no such algorithm. Further, we show through numerical simulations that even in the noiseless case convex relaxations fail when the number of measurements is comparable to the manifold dimension. This gives a practical counter-example to the growing literature on compressed acquisition of signals based on manifold dimension.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "living near the edge a lower bound on the phase transition of total variation minimization"):
  with members:
    - "on the error in phase transition computations for compressed sensing"
    - "sample complexity of total variation minimization"
    - "total variation minimization in compressed sensing"
    - "ell 1 analysis minimization and generalized co sparsity when does recovery succeed"
    - "precise phase transition of total variation minimization"
    - "convex recovery of a structured signal from independent random linear measurements"
    - "robust analysis l1 recovery from gaussian measurements and total variation minimization"
    - "corrupted sensing novel guarantees for separating structured signals"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ell 1 analysis minimization and generalized co sparsity when does recovery succeed"):
  with members:
    - "learning co sparse analysis operators with separable structures"
    - "precise phase transition of total variation minimization"
    - "compressive sensing with redundant dictionaries and structured measurements"
    - "robust analysis l1 recovery from gaussian measurements and total variation minimization"
    - "structure dependent sampling in compressed sensing theoretical guarantees for tight frames"
    - "projection onto the cosparse set is np hard"
    - "analysis operator learning and its application to image reconstruction"
    - "stable image reconstruction using total variation minimization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the generalized lasso with non linear observations"):
  with members:
    - "convex recovery of a structured signal from independent random linear measurements"
    - "learning without concentration"
    - "simple bounds for noisy linear inverse problems with exact side information"
    - "living on the edge phase transitions in convex programs with random data"
    - "new analysis of manifold embeddings and signal recovery from compressive measurements"
    - "the squared error of generalized lasso a precise analysis"
    - "robust 1 bit compressed sensing and sparse logistic regression a convex programming approach"
    - "one bit compressed sensing with non gaussian measurements"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)