human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "combinatorial redundancy detection"
  Abstract: The problem of detecting and removing redundant constraints is fundamental in optimization. We focus on the case of linear programs (LPs) in dictionary form, given by $n$ equality constraints in $n+d$ variables, where the variables are constrained to be nonnegative. A variable $x_r$ is called redundant, if after removing $x_r \geq 0$ the LP still has the same feasible region. The time needed to solve such an LP is denoted by $LP(n,d)$. #R##N#It is easy to see that solving $n+d$ LPs of the above size is sufficient to detect all redundancies. The currently fastest practical method is the one by Clarkson: it solves $n+d$ linear programs, but each of them has at most $s$ variables, where $s$ is the number of nonredundant constraints. #R##N#In the first part we show that knowing all of the finitely many dictionaries of the LP is sufficient for the purpose of redundancy detection. A dictionary is a matrix that can be thought of as an enriched encoding of a vertex in the LP. Moreover - and this is the combinatorial aspect - it is enough to know only the signs of the entries, the actual values do not matter. Concretely we show that for any variable $x_r$ one can find a dictionary, such that its sign pattern is either a redundancy or nonredundancy certificate for $x_r$. #R##N#In the second part we show that considering only the sign patterns of the dictionary, there is an output sensitive algorithm of running time $\mathcal{O}(d \cdot (n+d) \cdot s^{d-1} \cdot LP(s,d) + d \cdot s^{d} \cdot LP(n,d))$ to detect all redundancies. In the case where all constraints are in general position, the running time is $\mathcal{O}(s \cdot LP(n,d) + (n+d) \cdot LP(s,d))$, which is essentially the running time of the Clarkson method. Our algorithm extends naturally to a more general setting of arrangements of oriented topological hyperplane arrangements.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "minimum equivalent precedence relation systems"):
  with members:
    - "approximating the minimum equivalent digraph"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CG(Computational Geometry)