human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "bounded termination of monotonicity constraint transition systems"
  Abstract: Intuitively, if we can prove that a program terminates, we expect some conclusion regarding its complexity. But the passage from termination proofs to complexity bounds is not always clear. In this work we consider Monotonicity Constraint Transition Systems, a program abstraction where termination is decidable (based on the size-change termination principle). We show that these programs also have a decidable complexity property: one can determine whether the length of all transition sequences can be bounded in terms of the initial state. This is the Bounded Termination problem. Interestingly, if a bound exists, it must be polynomial. We prove that the bounded termination problem is PSPACE-complete. #R##N#We also discuss, theoretically, the use of bounds on the abstract program to infer conclusions on a concrete program that has been abstracted. The conclusion maybe a polynomial time bound, or in other cases polynomial space or exponential time. We argue that the monotonicity-constraint abstraction promises to be useful for practical complexity analysis of programs.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "complexity bounds for ordinal based termination"):
  with members:
    - "complexity hierarchies beyond elementary"
    - "proving termination with transition invariants of height omega"
    - "the power of well structured systems"
    - "ranking functions for linear constraint loops"
    - "automated complexity analysis based on the dependency pair method"
    - "ackermannian and primitive recursive bounds with dickson s lemma"
    - "multiply recursive upper bounds with higman s lemma"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a combination framework for complexity"):
  with members:
    - "polynomial path orders"
    - "on constructor rewrite systems and the lambda calculus"
    - "a new order theoretic characterisation of the polytime computable functions"
    - "efficient csl model checking using stratification"
    - "polynomial path orders a maximal model"
    - "automated complexity analysis based on the dependency pair method"
    - "monotonicity constraints for termination in the integer domain"
    - "the derivational complexity induced by the dependency pair method"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)