human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "reducing controversy by connecting opposing views"
  Abstract: Society is often polarized by controversial issues, that split the population into groups of opposing views. When such issues emerge on social media, we often observe the creation of 'echo chambers', i.e., situations where like-minded people reinforce each other's opinion, but do not get exposed to the views of the opposing side. In this paper we study algorithmic techniques for bridging these chambers, and thus, reducing controversy. Specifically, we represent the discussion on a controversial issue with an endorsement graph, and cast our problem as an edge-recommendation problem on this graph. The goal of the recommendation is to reduce the controversy score of the graph, which is measured by a recently-developed metric based on random walks. At the same time, we take into account the acceptance probability of the recommended edge, which represents how likely the edge is to materialize in the endorsement graph. We propose a simple model based on a recently-developed user-level controversy score, that is competitive with state-of- the-art link-prediction algorithms. We thus aim at finding the edges that produce the largest reduction in the controversy score, in expectation. To solve this problem, we propose an efficient algorithm, which considers only a fraction of all the combinations of possible edges. Experimental results show that our algorithm is more efficient than a simple greedy heuristic, while producing comparable score reduction. Finally, a comparison with other state-of-the-art edge-addition algorithms shows that this problem is fundamentally different from what has been studied in the literature.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "vocabulary based method for quantifying controversy in social media"):
  with members:
    - "quantifying polarization on twitter the kavanaugh nomination"
    - "community interaction and conflict on the web"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "joint non negative matrix factorization for learning ideological leaning on twitter"
    - "a distance measure for the analysis of polar opinion dynamics in social networks"
    - "characterizing information diets of social media users"
    - "using word embeddings in twitter election classification"
    - "characterizing the language of online communities and its relation to community reception"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "choice set optimization under discrete choice models of group decisions"):
  with members:
    - "learning choice functions"
    - "learning mixtures of plackett luce models from structured partial orders"
    - "discovering context effects from raw choice data"
    - "on the convergence of adam and beyond"
    - "learning choice functions concepts and architectures"
    - "pytorch an imperative style high performance deep learning library"
    - "predicting choice with set dependent aggregation"
    - "reasoning in bayesian opinion exchange networks is pspace hard"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "inducing equilibria in networked public goods games through network structure modification"):
  with members:
    - "election control in social networks via edge addition or removal"
    - "computing equilibria in binary networked public goods games"
    - "pricing public goods for private sale"
    - "maximizing the spread of cascades using network design"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "finding large balanced subgraphs in signed networks"):
  with members:
    - "discovering polarized communities in signed networks"
    - "a survey of signed network mining in social media"
    - "controversy and sentiment in online news"
    - "maximum balanced subgraph problem parameterized above lower bound"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "can celebrities burst your bubble"):
  with members:
    - "mitigating confirmation bias on twitter by recommending opposing views"
    - "big questions for social media big data representativeness validity and other methodological pitfalls"
    - "optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "your stance is exposed analysing possible factors for stance detection on social media"):
  with members:
    - "unsupervised user stance detection on twitter"
    - "assessing sentiment of the expressed stance on social media"
    - "automatic stance detection using end to end memory networks"
    - "topical stance detection for twitter a two phase lstm model using attention"
    - "discourse aware rumour stance classification in social media using sequential classifiers"
    - "hiding individuals and communities in a social network"
    - "friends and enemies of clinton and trump using context for detecting stance in political tweets"
    - "stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "reconciliation k median clustering with non polarized representatives"):
  with members:
    - "constant factor approximation for ordered k median"
    - "minimizing polarization and disagreement in social networks"
    - "balancing information exposure in social networks"
    - "joint non negative matrix factorization for learning ideological leaning on twitter"
    - "better guarantees for k means and euclidean k median by primal dual algorithms"
    - "an improved approximation for k median and positive correlation in budgeted optimization"
    - "bi factor approximation algorithms for hard capacitated k median problems"
    - "approximating k median via pseudo approximation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "gaps in information access in social networks"):
  with members:
    - "racial categories in machine learning"
    - "fairness behind a veil of ignorance a welfare analysis for automated decision making"
    - "minimizing polarization and disagreement in social networks"
    - "equality of opportunity in supervised learning"
    - "a confidence based approach for balancing fairness and accuracy"
    - "influence maximization near optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency"
    - "fairness through awareness"
    - "pricing strategies for viral marketing on social networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)