human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "linear network code for erasure broadcast channel with feedback complexity and algorithms"
  Abstract: This paper investigates the construction of linear network codes for broadcasting a set of data packets to a number of users. The links from the source to the users are modeled as independent erasure channels. Users are allowed to inform the source node whether a packet is received correctly via feedback channels. In order to minimize the number of packet transmissions until all users have received all packets successfully, it is necessary that a data packet, if successfully received by a user, can increase the dimension of the vector space spanned by the encoding vectors he or she has received by one. Such an encoding vector is called innovative. We prove that innovative linear network code is uniformly optimal in minimizing user download delay. When the finite field size is strictly smaller than the number of users, the problem of determining the existence of innovative vectors is proven to be NP-complete. When the field size is larger than or equal to the number of users, innovative vectors always exist and random linear network code (RLNC) is able to find an innovative vector with high probability. While RLNC is optimal in terms of completion time, it has high decoding complexity due to the need of solving a system of linear equations. To reduce decoding time, we propose the use of sparse linear network code, since the sparsity property of encoding vectors can be exploited when solving systems of linear equations. Generating a sparsest encoding vector with large finite field size, however, is shown to be NP-hard. An approximation algorithm that guarantee the Hamming weight of a generated encoding vector to be smaller than a certain factor of the optimal value is constructed. Our simulation results show that our proposed methods have excellent performance in completion time and outperforms RLNC in terms of decoding time.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)