human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the heterogeneous ensembles of standard classification algorithms hesca the whole is greater than the sum of its parts"
  Abstract: Building classification models is an intrinsically practical exercise that requires many design decisions prior to deployment. We aim to provide some guidance in this decision making process. Specifically, given a classification problem with real valued attributes, we consider which classifier or family of classifiers should one use. Strong contenders are tree based homogeneous ensembles, support vector machines or deep neural networks. All three families of model could claim to be state-of-the-art, and yet it is not clear when one is preferable to the others. Our extensive experiments with over 200 data sets from two distinct archives demonstrate that, rather than choose a single family and expend computing resources on optimising that model, it is significantly better to build simpler versions of classifiers from each family and ensemble. We show that the Heterogeneous Ensembles of Standard Classification Algorithms (HESCA), which ensembles based on error estimates formed on the train data, is significantly better (in terms of error, balanced error, negative log likelihood and area under the ROC curve) than its individual components, picking the component that is best on train data, and a support vector machine tuned over 1089 different parameter configurations. We demonstrate HESCA+, which contains a deep neural network, a support vector machine and two decision tree forests, is significantly better than its components, picking the best component, and HESCA. We analyse the results further and find that HESCA and HESCA+ are of particular value when the train set size is relatively small and the problem has multiple classes. HESCA is a fast approach that is, on average, as good as state-of-the-art classifiers, whereas HESCA+ is significantly better than average and represents a strong benchmark for future research.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "deep learning for time series classification a review"):
  with members:
    - "detecting and interpreting myocardial infarction using fully convolutional neural networks"
    - "proximity forest an effective and scalable distance based classifier for time series"
    - "deep learning for sensor based activity recognition a survey"
    - "reservoir computing approaches for representation and classification of multivariate time series"
    - "cost sensitive convolution based neural networks for imbalanced time series classification"
    - "genesis of basic and multi layer echo state network recurrent autoencoders for efficient data representations"
    - "deep k nearest neighbors towards confident interpretable and robust deep learning"
    - "transfer learning for time series classification"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ts chief a scalable and accurate forest algorithm for time series classification"):
  with members:
    - "scalable dictionary classifiers for time series classification"
    - "deep learning for time series classification a review"
    - "proximity forest an effective and scalable distance based classifier for time series"
    - "deep learning for sensor based activity recognition a survey"
    - "temporal convolutional neural network for the classification of satellite image time series"
    - "from bop to boss and beyond time series classification with dictionary based classifiers"
    - "scalable and accurate deep learning for electronic health records"
    - "the ucr time series archive"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "scalable dictionary classifiers for time series classification"):
  with members:
    - "proximity forest an effective and scalable distance based classifier for time series"
    - "the ucr time series archive"
    - "fast and accurate time series classification with weasel"
    - "should we really use post hoc tests based on mean ranks"
    - "a time series forest for classification and feature extraction"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "gendis genetic discovery of shapelets"):
  with members:
    - "scalable discovery of time series shapelets"
    - "ultra fast shapelets for time series classification"
    - "should we really use post hoc tests based on mean ranks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)