human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the load and availability of byzantine quorum systems"
  Abstract: Replicated services accessed via {\em quorums} enable each access to be performed at only a subset (quorum) of the servers, and achieve consistency across accesses by requiring any two quorums to intersect. Recently, $b$-masking quorum systems, whose intersections contain at least $2b+1$ servers, have been proposed to construct replicated services tolerant of $b$ arbitrary (Byzantine) server failures. In this paper we consider a hybrid fault model allowing benign failures in addition to the Byzantine ones. We present four novel constructions for $b$-masking quorum systems in this model, each of which has optimal {\em load} (the probability of access of the busiest server) or optimal availability (probability of some quorum surviving failures). To show optimality we also prove lower bounds on the load and availability of any $b$-masking quorum system in this model.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "is stellar as secure as you think"):
  with members:
    - "decentralization in bitcoin and ethereum networks"
    - "federated byzantine quorum systems extended version"
    - "an empirical analysis of linkability in the monero blockchain"
    - "be selfish and avoid dilemmas fork after withholding faw attacks on bitcoin"
    - "optimal selfish mining strategies in bitcoin"
    - "majority is not enough bitcoin mining is vulnerable"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "mathematical analysis and algorithms for federated byzantine agreement systems"):
  with members:
    - "complexity of the quorum intersection property of the federated byzantine agreement system"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "blockchains consensus protocols in the wild"):
  with members:
    - "rollback and forking detection for trusted execution environments using lightweight collective memory"
    - "malware guard extension using sgx to conceal cache attacks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)