human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "analysis of randomized work stealing with false sharing"
  Abstract: This paper analyzes the cache miss cost of algorithms when scheduled using randomized work stealing (RWS) in a parallel environment, taking into account the effects of false sharing. #R##N#First, prior analyses (due to Acar et al.) are extended to incorporate false sharing. However, to control the possible delays due to false sharing, some restrictions on the algorithms seem necessary. Accordingly, the class of Hierarchical Tree algorithms is introduced and their performance analyzed. #R##N#In addition, the paper analyzes the performance of a subclass of the Hierarchical Tree Algorithms, called HBP algorithms, when scheduled using RWS; improved complexity bounds are obtained for this subclass. This class was introduced in a companion paper with efficient resource oblivious computation in mind. #R##N#Finally, we note that in a scenario in which there is no false sharing the results in this paper match prior bounds for cache misses but with reduced assumptions, and in particular with no need for a bounding concave function for the cost of cache misses as in prior work by Frigo and Strumpen. This allows non-trivial cache miss bounds in this case to be obtained for a larger class of algorithms.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bringing inter thread cache benefits to federated scheduling extended results technical report"):
  with members:
    - "reservation based federated scheduling for parallel real time tasks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "resource oblivious sorting on multicores"):
  with members:
    - "efficient resource oblivious algorithms for multicores"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "efficient resource oblivious algorithms for multicores"):
  with members:
    - "resource oblivious sorting on multicores"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)