human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the validation of advanced bibliometric indicators through peer assessments a comparative study using data from incites and f1000"
  Abstract: The data of F1000 provide us with the unique opportunity to investigate the relationship between peers' ratings and bibliometric metrics on a broad and comprehensive data set with high-quality ratings. F1000 is a post-publication peer review system of the biomedical literature. The comparison of metrics with peer evaluation has been widely acknowledged as a way of validating metrics. Based on the seven indicators offered by InCites, we analyzed the validity of raw citation counts (Times Cited, 2nd Generation Citations, and 2nd Generation Citations per Citing Document), normalized indicators (Journal Actual/Expected Citations, Category Actual/Expected Citations, and Percentile in Subject Area), and a journal based indicator (Journal Impact Factor). The data set consists of 125 papers published in 2008 and belonging to the subject category cell biology or immunology. As the results show, Percentile in Subject Area achieves the highest correlation with F1000 ratings; we can assert that for further three other indicators (Times Cited, 2nd Generation Citations, and Category Actual/Expected Citations) the 'true' correlation with the ratings reaches at least a medium effect size.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators"):
  with members:
    - "which differences can be expected when two universities in the leiden ranking are compared some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations"
    - "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"
    - "revisiting relative indicators and provisional truths"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "how are excellent highly cited papers defined in bibliometrics a quantitative analysis of the literature"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "peer review versus bibliometrics which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications"):
  with members:
    - "systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the uk ref"
    - "predicting publication long term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor"
    - "peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings a large scale analysis"
    - "do citations and readership identify seminal publications"
    - "revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement"
    - "selecting competent referees to assess research projects proposals a study of referees registers"
    - "do they agree bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the italian research assessment exercise"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references a validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on f1000prime data"):
  with members:
    - "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators"
    - "heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation"
    - "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"
    - "identifying potential breakthrough publications using refined citation analyses three related explorative approaches"
    - "coauthorship networks a directed network approach considering the order and number of coauthors"
    - "the effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and f1000 recommendations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "social media metrics for new research evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "on the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and mendeley readership counts a large scale analysis of web of science publications"
    - "towards the social media studies of science social media metrics present and future"
    - "mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications"
    - "scholars on twitter who and how many are they"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a systematic identification and analysis of scientists on twitter"
    - "grand challenges in altmetrics heterogeneity data quality and dependencies"
    - "t factor a metric for measuring impact on twitter"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "do citations and readership identify seminal publications"):
  with members:
    - "incidental or influential challenges in automatically detecting citation importance using publication full texts"
    - "measuring academic influence not all citations are equal"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community"
    - "citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality could the latter ever be preferable"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature"):
  with members:
    - "interpreting altmetrics viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories"
    - "validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact a study using data from altmetric and f1000prime"
    - "tweets vs mendeley readers how do these two social media metrics differ"
    - "do altmetrics correlate with citations extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective"
    - "tweets as impact indicators examining the implications of automated bot accounts on twitter"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "new data new possibilities exploring the insides of altmetric com"
    - "how well developed are altmetrics a cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration an analysis based on data from f1000prime and normalized citation scores"):
  with members:
    - "excellence networks in science a web based application based on bayesian multilevel logistic regression bmlr for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully"
    - "validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact a study using data from altmetric and f1000prime"
    - "how are excellent highly cited papers defined in bibliometrics a quantitative analysis of the literature"
    - "the substantive and practical significance of citation impact differences between institutions guidelines for the analysis of percentiles using effect sizes and confidence intervals"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "brics countries and scientific excellence a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers"
    - "on the causes of subject specific citation rates in web of science"
    - "how to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences an empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "grand challenges in altmetrics heterogeneity data quality and dependencies"):
  with members:
    - "interpreting altmetrics viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories"
    - "altmetrics as traces of the computerization of the research process"
    - "when is an article actually published an analysis of online availability publication and indexation dates"
    - "tweets vs mendeley readers how do these two social media metrics differ"
    - "do altmetrics correlate with citations extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective"
    - "tweets as impact indicators examining the implications of automated bot accounts on twitter"
    - "altmetrics in the wild using social media to explore scholarly impact"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)