human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "lazypim efficient support for cache coherence in processing in memory architectures"
  Abstract: Processing-in-memory (PIM) architectures have seen an increase in popularity recently, as the high internal bandwidth available within 3D-stacked memory provides greater incentive to move some computation into the logic layer of the memory. To maintain program correctness, the portions of a program that are executed in memory must remain coherent with the portions of the program that continue to execute within the processor. Unfortunately, PIM architectures cannot use traditional approaches to cache coherence due to the high off-chip traffic consumed by coherence messages, which, as we illustrate in this work, can undo the benefits of PIM execution for many data-intensive applications. We propose LazyPIM, a new hardware cache coherence mechanism designed specifically for PIM. Prior approaches for coherence in PIM are ill-suited to applications that share a large amount of data between the processor and the PIM logic. LazyPIM uses a combination of speculative cache coherence and compressed coherence signatures to greatly reduce the overhead of keeping PIM coherent with the processor, even when a large amount of sharing exists.We find that LazyPIM improves average performance across a range of data-intensive PIM applications by 19.6%, reduces off-chip traffic by 30.9%, and reduces energy consumption by 18.0%, over the best prior approaches to PIM coherence.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "processing data where it makes sense enabling in memory computation"):
  with members:
    - "enabling the adoption of processing in memory challenges mechanisms future research directions"
    - "architectural techniques for improving nand flash memory reliability"
    - "what your dram power models are not telling you lessons from a detailed experimental study"
    - "techniques for shared resource management in systems with throughput processors"
    - "errors in flash memory based solid state drives analysis mitigation and recovery"
    - "the rowhammer problem and other issues we may face as memory becomes denser"
    - "error characterization mitigation and recovery in flash memory based solid state drives"
    - "using ecc dram to adaptively increase memory capacity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a workload and programming ease driven perspective of processing in memory"):
  with members:
    - "processing data where it makes sense enabling in memory computation"
    - "in dram bulk bitwise execution engine"
    - "rowhammer a retrospective"
    - "accelerating bulk bit wise x n or operation in processing in dram platform"
    - "shouji a fast and efficient pre alignment filter for sequence alignment"
    - "enabling the adoption of processing in memory challenges mechanisms future research directions"
    - "memristive devices for computation in memory"
    - "what your dram power models are not telling you lessons from a detailed experimental study"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "enabling the adoption of processing in memory challenges mechanisms future research directions"):
  with members:
    - "using ecc dram to adaptively increase memory capacity"
    - "understanding and improving the latency of dram based memory systems"
    - "reducing dram latency at low cost by exploiting heterogeneity"
    - "rowhammer reliability analysis and security implications"
    - "buddy ram improving the performance and efficiency of bulk bitwise operations using dram"
    - "the processing using memory paradigm in dram bulk copy initialization bitwise and and or"
    - "simple dram and virtual memory abstractions to enable highly efficient memory systems"
    - "improving dram performance by parallelizing refreshes with accesses"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AR(Hardware Architecture)