human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the complexity of manipulative attacks in nearly single peaked electorates"
  Abstract: Many electoral bribery, control, and manipulation problems (which we will refer to in general as "manipulative actions" problems) are NP-hard in the general case. It has recently been noted that many of these problems fall into polynomial time if the electorate is single-peaked (i.e., is polarized along some axis/issue). However, real-world electorates are not truly single-peaked. There are usually some mavericks, and so real-world electorates tend to merely be nearly single-peaked. This paper studies the complexity of manipulative-action algorithms for elections over nearly single-peaked electorates, for various notions of nearness and various election systems. We provide instances where even one maverick jumps the manipulative-action complexity up to $\np$-hardness, but we also provide many instances where a reasonable number of mavericks can be tolerated without increasing the manipulative-action complexity.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the complexity of constructive control under nearly single peaked preferences"):
  with members:
    - "computational aspects of nearly single peaked electorates"
    - "reinstating combinatorial protections for manipulation and bribery in single peaked and nearly single peaked electorates"
    - "structure in dichotomous preferences"
    - "the control complexity of r approval from the single peaked case to the general case"
    - "on the computation of fully proportional representation"
    - "the complexity of fully proportional representation for single crossing electorates"
    - "multimode control attacks on elections"
    - "the complexity of manipulating k approval elections"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "manipulating districts to win elections fine grained complexity"):
  with members:
    - "complexity of manipulation with partial information in voting"
    - "optimal parameterized algorithms for planar facility location problems using voronoi diagrams"
    - "kernelization complexity of possible winner and coalitional manipulation problems in voting"
    - "anyone but him the complexity of precluding an alternative"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "incomplete preferences in single peaked electorates"):
  with members:
    - "on the likelihood of single peaked preferences"
    - "computational aspects of nearly single peaked electorates"
    - "recognising multidimensional euclidean preferences"
    - "modeling single peakedness for votes with ties"
    - "single peaked consistency for weak orders is easy"
    - "reinstating combinatorial protections for manipulation and bribery in single peaked and nearly single peaked electorates"
    - "the one dimensional euclidean domain finitely many obstructions are not enough"
    - "complexity of manipulative actions when voting with ties"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "surprise in elections"):
  with members:
    - "estimating the margin of victory of an election using sampling"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "computational aspects of nearly single peaked electorates"):
  with members:
    - "on the likelihood of single peaked preferences"
    - "are there any nicely structured preference profiles nearby"
    - "structure in dichotomous preferences"
    - "the control complexity of r approval from the single peaked case to the general case"
    - "on the computation of fully proportional representation"
    - "the complexity of fully proportional representation for single crossing electorates"
    - "clone structures in voters preferences"
    - "the shield that never was societies with single peaked preferences are more open to manipulation and control"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "on the likelihood of single peaked preferences"):
  with members:
    - "computational aspects of nearly single peaked electorates"
    - "the one dimensional euclidean domain finitely many obstructions are not enough"
    - "are there any nicely structured preference profiles nearby"
    - "on the computation of fully proportional representation"
    - "clone structures in voters preferences"
    - "an empirical study of the manipulability of single transferable voting"
    - "where are the hard manipulation problems"
    - "the shield that never was societies with single peaked preferences are more open to manipulation and control"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "modeling single peakedness for votes with ties"):
  with members:
    - "computational aspects of nearly single peaked electorates"
    - "single peaked consistency for weak orders is easy"
    - "reinstating combinatorial protections for manipulation and bribery in single peaked and nearly single peaked electorates"
    - "complexity of manipulative actions when voting with ties"
    - "complexity of manipulation in elections with top truncated ballots"
    - "the computational impact of partial votes on strategic voting"
    - "the shield that never was societies with single peaked preferences are more open to manipulation and control"
    - "dichotomy for voting systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "recognizing and eliciting weakly single crossing profiles on trees"):
  with members:
    - "computational aspects of nearly single peaked electorates"
    - "elicitation for preferences single peaked on trees"
    - "preference elicitation for single crossing domain"
    - "structure in dichotomous preferences"
    - "the single crossing property on a tree"
    - "on the computation of fully proportional representation"
    - "the complexity of fully proportional representation for single crossing electorates"
    - "eliciting single peaked preferences using comparison queries"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)