human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "attraction based receding horizon path planning with temporal logic constraints"
  Abstract: Our goal in this paper is to plan the motion of a robot in a partitioned environment with dynamically changing, locally sensed rewards. We assume that arbitrary assumptions on the reward dynamics can be given. The robot aims to accomplish a high-level temporal logic surveillance mission and to locally optimize the collection of the rewards in the visited regions. These two objectives often conflict and only a compromise between them can be reached. We address this issue by taking into consideration a user-defined preference function that captures the trade-off between the importance of collecting high rewards and the importance of making progress towards a surveyed region. Our solution leverages ideas from the automata-based approach to model checking. We demonstrate the utilization and benefits of the suggested framework in an illustrative example.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "multi agent planning under local ltl specifications and event based synchronization"):
  with members:
    - "a receding horizon approach to multi agent planning from local ltl specifications"
    - "multi robot deployment from ltl specifications with reduced communication"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a receding horizon approach to multi agent planning from local ltl specifications"):
  with members:
    - "multi robot deployment from ltl specifications with reduced communication"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "optimal control of mdps with temporal logic constraints"):
  with members:
    - "optimal receding horizon control for finite deterministic systems with temporal logic constraints"
    - "energy and mean payoff parity markov decision processes"
    - "mdp optimal control under temporal logic constraints"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.RO(Robotics)