human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "equilibrium approximation quality of current no limit poker bots"
  Abstract: Approximating a Nash equilibrium is currently the best performing approach for creating poker-playing programs. While for the simplest variants of the game, it is possible to evaluate the quality of the approximation by computing the value of the best response strategy, this is currently not computationally feasible for larger variants of the game, such as heads-up no-limit Texas hold'em. In this paper, we present a simple and computationally inexpensive Local Best Response method for computing an approximate lower bound on the value of the best response strategy. Using this method, we show that existing poker-playing programs, based on solving abstract games, are remarkably poor Nash equilibrium approximations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "single deep counterfactual regret minimization"):
  with members:
    - "actor critic policy optimization in partially observable multiagent environments"
    - "solving imperfect information games via discounted regret minimization"
    - "depth limited solving for imperfect information games"
    - "deep counterfactual regret minimization"
    - "variance reduction in monte carlo counterfactual regret minimization vr mccfr for extensive form games using baselines"
    - "safe and nested subgame solving for imperfect information games"
    - "regret minimization for partially observable deep reinforcement learning"
    - "a unified game theoretic approach to multiagent reinforcement learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "neural fictitious self play on elf mini rts"):
  with members:
    - "elf an extensive lightweight and flexible research platform for real time strategy games"
    - "learning with opponent learning awareness"
    - "starcraft ii a new challenge for reinforcement learning"
    - "hybrid reward architecture for reinforcement learning"
    - "mastering chess and shogi by self play with a general reinforcement learning algorithm"
    - "proximal policy optimization algorithms"
    - "deep reinforcement learning from self play in imperfect information games"
    - "torchcraft a library for machine learning research on real time strategy games"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)