human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "more flexible differential privacy the application of piecewise mixture distributions in query release"
  Abstract: There is an increasing demand to make data "open" to third parties, as data sharing has great benefits in data-driven decision making. However, with a wide variety of sensitive data collected, protecting privacy of individuals, communities and organizations, is an essential factor in making data "open". The approaches currently adopted by industry in releasing private data are often ad hoc and prone to a number of attacks, including re-identification attacks, as they do not provide adequate privacy guarantees. While differential privacy has attracted significant interest from academia and industry by providing rigorous and reliable privacy guarantees, the reduced utility and inflexibility of current differentially private algorithms for data release is a barrier to their use in real-life. This paper aims to address these two challenges. First, we propose a novel mechanism to augment the conventional utility of differential privacy by fusing two Laplace or geometric distributions together. We derive closed form expressions for entropy, variance of added noise, and absolute expectation of noise for the proposed piecewise mixtures. Then the relevant distributions are utilised to theoretically prove the privacy and accuracy guarantees of the proposed mechanisms. Second, we show that our proposed mechanisms have greater flexibility, with three parameters to adjust, giving better utility in bounding noise, and mitigating larger inaccuracy, in comparison to typical one-parameter differentially private mechanisms. We then empirically evaluate the performance of piecewise mixture distributions with extensive simulations and with a real-world dataset for both linear count queries and histogram queries. The empirical results show an increase in all utility measures considered, while maintaining privacy, for the piecewise mixture mechanisms compared to standard Laplace or geometric mechanisms.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)