human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "profitable scheduling on multiple speed scalable processors"
  Abstract: We present a new online algorithm for profit-oriented scheduling on multiple speed-scalable processors. Moreover, we provide a tight analysis of the algorithm's competitiveness. Our results generalize and improve upon work by \textcite{Chan:2010}, which considers a single speed-scalable processor. Using significantly different techniques, we can not only extend their model to multiprocessors but also prove an enhanced and tight competitive ratio for our algorithm. #R##N#In our scheduling problem, jobs arrive over time and are preemptable. They have different workloads, values, and deadlines. The scheduler may decide not to finish a job but instead to suffer a loss equaling the job's value. However, to process a job's workload until its deadline the scheduler must invest a certain amount of energy. The cost of a schedule is the sum of lost values and invested energy. In order to finish a job the scheduler has to determine which processors to use and set their speeds accordingly. A processor's energy consumption is power $\Power{s}$ integrated over time, where $\Power{s}=s^{\alpha}$ is the power consumption when running at speed $s$. Since we consider the online variant of the problem, the scheduler has no knowledge about future jobs. This problem was introduced by \textcite{Chan:2010} for the case of a single processor. They presented an online algorithm which is $\alpha^{\alpha}+2e\alpha$-competitive. We provide an online algorithm for the case of multiple processors with an improved competitive ratio of $\alpha^{\alpha}$.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "lagrangian duality based algorithms in online scheduling"):
  with members:
    - "competitive algorithms from competitive equilibria non clairvoyant scheduling under polyhedral constraints"
    - "selfishmigrate a scalable algorithm for non clairvoyantly scheduling heterogeneous processors"
    - "speed scaling with power down scheduling for agreeable deadlines"
    - "online primal dual for non linear optimization with applications to speed scaling"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "throughput maximization in multiprocessor speed scaling"):
  with members:
    - "energy efficient scheduling and routing via randomized rounding"
    - "throughput maximization in the speed scaling setting"
    - "speed scaling on parallel processors with migration"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)