human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a fault resistant asynchronous clock function"
  Abstract: Consider an asynchronous network in a shared-memory environment consisting of n nodes. Assume that up to f of the nodes might be Byzantine (n > 12f), where the adversary is full-information and dynamic (sometimes called adaptive). In addition, the non-Byzantine nodes may undergo transient failures. Nodes advance in atomic steps, which consist of reading all registers, performing some calculation and writing to all registers. #R##N#This paper contains three main contributions. First, the clock-function problem is defined, which is a generalization of the clock synchronization problem. This generalization encapsulates previous clock synchronization problem definitions while extending them to the current paper's model. Second, a randomized asynchronous self-stabilizing Byzantine tolerant clock synchronization algorithm is presented. #R##N#In the construction of the clock synchronization algorithm, a building block that ensures different nodes advance at similar rates is developed. This feature is the third contribution of the paper. It is self-stabilizing and Byzantine tolerant and can be used as a building block for different algorithms that operate in an asynchronous self-stabilizing Byzantine model. #R##N#The convergence time of the presented algorithm is exponential. Observe that in the asynchronous setting the best known full-information dynamic Byzantine agreement also has expected exponential convergence time, even though currently there is no known reduction between the two.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "dynamic ftss in asynchronous systems the case of unison"):
  with members:
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "on byzantine containment properties of the min 1 protocol"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "weak vs self vs probabilistic stabilization"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)