human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a strong direct product theorem for the tribes function via the smooth rectangle bound"
  Abstract: The main result of this paper is an optimal strong direct#R##N#product result for the two-party public-coin randomized communication#R##N#complexity of the Tribes function. This is proved by providing an#R##N#alternate proof of the optimal lower bound of Omega(n) for the randomised communication complexity of the Tribes function using the so-called smooth-rectangle bound, introduced by Jain and Klauck [CCC/2010]. The optimal Omega(n) lower bound for Tribes was originally proved by Jayram, Kumar and Sivakumar [STOC/2003], using a more powerful lower bound technique, namely the information complexity bound. The information complexity bound is known to be at least as strong a lower bound method as the smooth-rectangle bound [Kerenidis et al, 2012]. On the other hand, we are not aware of any function or relation for which the smooth-rectangle bound is (asymptotically) smaller than its public-coin randomized communication complexity. The optimal direct product for Tribes is obtained by combining our smooth-rectangle bound for tribes with the strong direct product result of Jain and Yao (2012) in terms of smooth-rectangle bound.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a strong direct product theorem in terms of the smooth rectangle bound"):
  with members:
    - "lower bounds on information complexity via zero communication protocols and applications"
    - "information equals amortized communication"
    - "a discrepancy lower bound for information complexity"
    - "an optimal lower bound on the communication complexity of gap hamming distance"
    - "strong direct product theorems for quantum communication and query complexity"
    - "the partition bound for classical communication complexity and query complexity"
    - "a strong direct product theorem for disjointness"
    - "a direct sum theorem in communication complexity via message compression"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)