human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "measuring and understanding sensory representations within deep networks using a numerical optimization framework"
  Abstract: A central challenge in sensory neuroscience is describing how the activity of populations of neurons can represent useful features of the external environment. However, while neurophysiologists have long been able to record the responses of neurons in awake, behaving animals, it is another matter entirely to say what a given neuron does. A key problem is that in many sensory domains, the space of all possible stimuli that one might encounter is effectively infinite; in vision, for instance, natural scenes are combinatorially complex, and an organism will only encounter a tiny fraction of possible stimuli. As a result, even describing the response properties of sensory neurons is difficult, and investigations of neuronal functions are almost always critically limited by the number of stimuli that can be considered. In this paper, we propose a closed-loop, optimization-based experimental framework for characterizing the response properties of sensory neurons, building on past efforts in closed-loop experimental methods, and leveraging recent advances in artificial neural networks to serve as as a proving ground for our techniques. Specifically, using deep convolutional neural networks, we asked whether modern black-box optimization techniques can be used to interrogate the "tuning landscape" of an artificial neuron in a deep, nonlinear system, without imposing significant constraints on the space of stimuli under consideration. We introduce a series of measures to quantify the tuning landscapes, and show how these relate to the performances of the networks in an object recognition task. To the extent that deep convolutional neural networks increasingly serve as de facto working hypotheses for biological vision, we argue that developing a unified approach for studying both artificial and biological systems holds great potential to advance both fields together.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)