human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "learning based resource allocation scheme for tdd based cran system"
  Abstract: Explosive growth in the use of smart wireless devices has necessitated the provision of higher data rates and always-on connectivity, which are the main motivators for designing the fifth generation (5G) systems. To achieve higher system efficiency, massive antenna deployment with tight coordination is one potential strategy for designing 5G systems, but has two types of associated system overhead. First is the synchronization overhead, which can be reduced by implementing a cloud radio access network (CRAN)-based architecture design, that separates the baseband processing and radio access functionality to achieve better system synchronization. Second is the overhead for acquiring channel state information (CSI) of the users present in the system, which, however, increases tremendously when instantaneous CSI is used to serve high-mobility users. To serve a large number of users, a CRAN system with a dense deployment of remote radio heads (RRHs) is considered, such that each user has a line-of-sight (LOS) link with the corresponding RRH. Since, the trajectory of movement for high-mobility users is predictable; therefore, fairly accurate position estimates for those users can be obtained, and can be used for resource allocation to serve the considered users. The resource allocation is dependent upon various correlated system parameters, and these correlations can be learned using well-known \emph{machine learning} algorithms. This paper proposes a novel \emph{learning-based resource allocation scheme} for time division duplex (TDD) based 5G CRAN systems with dense RRH deployment, by using only the users' position estimates for resource allocation, thus avoiding the need for CSI acquisition. This reduces the overall system overhead significantly, while still achieving near-optimal system performance; thus, better (effective) system efficiency is achieved. (See the paper for full abstract)

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)