human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "identifying patch correctness in test based program repair"
  Abstract: Test-based automatic program repair has attracted a lot of attention in recent years. However, the test suites in practice are often too weak to guarantee correctness and existing approaches often generate a large number of incorrect patches. #R##N#To reduce the number of incorrect patches generated, we propose a novel approach that heuristically determines the correctness of the generated patches. The core idea is to exploit the behavior similarity of test case executions. The passing tests on original and patched programs are likely to behave similarly while the failing tests on original and patched programs are likely to behave differently. Also, if two tests exhibit similar runtime behavior, the two tests are likely to have the same test results. Based on these observations, we generate new test inputs to enhance the test suites and use their behavior similarity to determine patch correctness. #R##N#Our approach is evaluated on a dataset consisting of 139 patches generated from existing program repair systems including jGenProg, Nopol, jKali, ACS and HDRepair. Our approach successfully prevented 56.3\% of the incorrect patches to be generated, without blocking any correct patches.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "e apr mapping the effectiveness of automated program repair"):
  with members:
    - "learning the relation between code features and code transforms with structured prediction"
    - "how different is it between machine generated and developer provided patches an empirical study on the correct patches generated by automated program repair techniques"
    - "bears an extensible java bug benchmark for automatic program repair studies"
    - "alleviating patch overfitting with automatic test generation a study of feasibility and effectiveness for the nopol repair system"
    - "empirical review of java program repair tools a large scale experiment on 2 141 bugs and 23 551 repair attempts"
    - "automatic repair of real bugs in java a large scale experiment on the defects4j dataset"
    - "ultra large repair search space with automatically mined templates the cardumen mode of astor"
    - "arja automated repair of java programs via multi objective genetic programming"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ifixr bug report driven program repair"):
  with members:
    - "d c a divide and conquer approach to ir based bug localization"
    - "tbar revisiting template based automated program repair"
    - "sorting and transforming program repair ingredients via deep learning code similarities"
    - "alleviating patch overfitting with automatic test generation a study of feasibility and effectiveness for the nopol repair system"
    - "getafix learning to fix bugs automatically"
    - "avatar fixing semantic bugs with fix patterns of static analysis violations"
    - "on reliability of patch correctness assessment"
    - "fixminer mining relevant fix patterns for automated program repair"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "tbar revisiting template based automated program repair"):
  with members:
    - "bears an extensible java bug benchmark for automatic program repair studies"
    - "sorting and transforming program repair ingredients via deep learning code similarities"
    - "avatar fixing semantic bugs with fix patterns of static analysis violations"
    - "on reliability of patch correctness assessment"
    - "fixminer mining relevant fix patterns for automated program repair"
    - "automatic software repair a bibliography"
    - "ultra large repair search space with automatically mined templates the cardumen mode of astor"
    - "you cannot fix what you cannot find an investigation of fault localization bias in benchmarking automated program repair systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "patchnet hierarchical deep learning based stable patch identification for the linux kernel"):
  with members:
    - "ptracer a linux kernel patch trace bot"
    - "on the optimization of deep networks implicit acceleration by overparameterization"
    - "hierarchical learning of cross language mappings through distributed vector representations for code"
    - "the impact of class rebalancing techniques on the performance and interpretation of defect prediction models"
    - "semantically enhanced software traceability using deep learning techniques"
    - "deep api learning"
    - "particular object retrieval with integral max pooling of cnn activations"
    - "adam a method for stochastic optimization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "automated patch assessment for program repair at scale"):
  with members:
    - "how different is it between machine generated and developer provided patches an empirical study on the correct patches generated by automated program repair techniques"
    - "a comprehensive study of automatic program repair on the quixbugs benchmark"
    - "validation of automatically generated patches an appetizer"
    - "sequencer sequence to sequence learning for end to end program repair"
    - "bears an extensible java bug benchmark for automatic program repair studies"
    - "sorting and transforming program repair ingredients via deep learning code similarities"
    - "alleviating patch overfitting with automatic test generation a study of feasibility and effectiveness for the nopol repair system"
    - "empirical review of java program repair tools a large scale experiment on 2 141 bugs and 23 551 repair attempts"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "astor exploring the design space of generate and validate program repair beyond genprog"):
  with members:
    - "a comprehensive study of automatic program repair on the quixbugs benchmark"
    - "alleviating patch overfitting with automatic test generation a study of feasibility and effectiveness for the nopol repair system"
    - "automatic repair of real bugs in java a large scale experiment on the defects4j dataset"
    - "ultra large repair search space with automatically mined templates the cardumen mode of astor"
    - "arja automated repair of java programs via multi objective genetic programming"
    - "an empirical analysis of the influence of fault space on search based automated program repair"
    - "nopol automatic repair of conditional statement bugs in java programs"
    - "dynamic patch generation for null pointer exceptions using metaprogramming"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "validation of automatically generated patches an appetizer"):
  with members:
    - "metamorphic testing a new approach for generating next test cases"
    - "alleviating patch overfitting with automatic test generation a study of feasibility and effectiveness for the nopol repair system"
    - "getafix learning to fix bugs automatically"
    - "predicting metamorphic relation for matrix calculation programs"
    - "using semi supervised learning for predicting metamorphic relations"
    - "how to design a program repair bot insights from the repairnator project"
    - "nopol automatic repair of conditional statement bugs in java programs"
    - "precise condition synthesis for program repair"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "automated classification of overfitting patches with statically extracted code features"):
  with members:
    - "learning the relation between code features and code transforms with structured prediction"
    - "a comprehensive study of automatic program repair on the quixbugs benchmark"
    - "automated patch assessment for program repair at scale"
    - "alleviating patch overfitting with automatic test generation a study of feasibility and effectiveness for the nopol repair system"
    - "empirical review of java program repair tools a large scale experiment on 2 141 bugs and 23 551 repair attempts"
    - "on reliability of patch correctness assessment"
    - "automatic software repair a bibliography"
    - "coming a tool for mining change pattern instances from git commits"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)