human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "tournament versus fitness uniform selection"
  Abstract: In evolutionary algorithms a critical parameter that must be tuned is that of selection pressure. If it is set too low then the rate of convergence towards the optimum is likely to be slow. Alternatively if the selection pressure is set too high the system is likely to become stuck in a local optimum due to a loss of diversity in the population. The recent Fitness Uniform Selection Scheme (FUSS) is a conceptually simple but somewhat radical approach to addressing this problem - rather than biasing the selection towards higher fitness, FUSS biases selection towards sparsely populated fitness levels. In this paper we compare the relative performance of FUSS with the well known tournament selection scheme on a range of problems.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "frequency fitness assignment making optimization algorithms invariant under bijective transformations of the objective function"):
  with members:
    - "quality diversity through surprise"
    - "evaluating map elites on constrained optimization problems"
    - "precise runtime analysis for plateaus"
    - "towards a more practice aware runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms"
    - "quality and diversity optimization a unifying modular framework"
    - "illuminating search spaces by mapping elites"
    - "a tabu search path relinking algorithm to solve the job shop scheduling problem"
    - "novelty search in competitive coevolution"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "fitness uniform optimization"):
  with members:
    - "fitness uniform deletion a simple way to preserve diversity"
    - "fitness uniform selection to preserve genetic diversity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fitness uniform deletion a simple way to preserve diversity"):
  with members:
    - "fitness uniform selection to preserve genetic diversity"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)