human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "exploiting data longevity for enhancing the lifetime of flash based storage class memory"
  Abstract: Storage-class memory (SCM) combines the benefits of a solid-state memory, such as high-performance and robustness, with the archival capabilities and low cost of conventional hard-disk magnetic storage. Among candidate solid-state nonvolatile memory technologies that could potentially be used to construct SCM, flash memory is a well-established technology and have been widely used in commercially available SCM incarnations. Flash-based SCM enables much better tradeoffs between performance, space and power than disk-based systems. However, write endurance is a significant challenge for a flash-based SCM (each act of writing a bit may slightly damage a cell, so one flash cell can be written 10^4--10^5 times, depending on the flash technology, before it becomes unusable). This is a well-documented problem and has received a lot of attention by manufactures that are using some combination of write reduction and wear-leveling techniques for achieving longer lifetime. In an effort to improve flash lifetime, first, by quantifying data longevity in an SCM, we show that a majority of the data stored in a solid-state SCM do not require long retention times provided by flash memory (i.e., up to 10 years in modern devices); second, by exploiting retention time relaxation, we propose a novel mechanism, called Dense-SLC (D-SLC), which enables us perform multiple writes into a cell during each erase cycle for lifetime extension; and finally, we discuss the required changes in the flash management software (FTL) in order to use this characteristic for extending the lifetime of the solid-state part of an SCM. Using an extensive simulation-based analysis of a flash-based SCM, we demonstrate that D-SLC is able to significantly improve device lifetime (between 5.1X and 8.6X) with no performance overhead and also very small changes at the FTL software.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "experimental characterization optimization and recovery of data retention errors in mlc nand flash memory"):
  with members:
    - "errors in flash memory based solid state drives analysis mitigation and recovery"
    - "error characterization mitigation and recovery in flash memory based solid state drives"
    - "understanding and improving the latency of dram based memory systems"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AR(Hardware Architecture)