human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "de amortizing binary search trees"
  Abstract: We present a general method for de-amortizing essentially any Binary Search Tree (BST) algorithm. In particular, by transforming Splay Trees, our method produces a BST that has the same asymptotic cost as Splay Trees on any access sequence while performing each search in O(log n) worst case time. By transforming Multi-Splay Trees, we obtain a BST that is O(log log n) competitive, satisfies the scanning theorem, the static optimality theorem, the static finger theorem, the working set theorem, and performs each search in O(log n) worst case time. Moreover, we prove that if there is a dynamically optimal BST algorithm, then there is a dynamically optimal BST algorithm that answers every search in O(log n) worst case time.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "new paths from splay to dynamic optimality"):
  with members:
    - "splaying preorders and postorders"
    - "weighted dynamic finger in binary search trees"
    - "the landscape of bounds for binary search trees"
    - "a linear potential function for pairing heaps"
    - "a study on splay trees"
    - "pattern avoiding access in binary search trees"
    - "self adjusting binary search trees what makes them tick"
    - "combining binary search trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "weighted dynamic finger in binary search trees"):
  with members:
    - "a global geometric view of splaying"
    - "combining binary search trees"
    - "the power and limitations of static binary search trees with lazy finger"
    - "in pursuit of the dynamic optimality conjecture"
    - "upper bounds for maximally greedy binary search trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "combining binary search trees"):
  with members:
    - "the power and limitations of static binary search trees with lazy finger"
    - "improved upper bounds for pairing heaps"
    - "layered working set trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "in pursuit of the dynamic optimality conjecture"):
  with members:
    - "combining binary search trees"
    - "the power and limitations of static binary search trees with lazy finger"
    - "upper bounds for maximally greedy binary search trees"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)