human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "approximation schemes for binary quadratic programming problems with low cp rank decompositions"
  Abstract: Binary quadratic programming problems have attracted much attention in the last few decades due to their potential applications. This type of problems are NP-hard in general, and still considered a challenge in the design of efficient approximation algorithms for their solutions. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the approximability for a class of such problems where the constraint matrices are {\it completely positive} and have low {\it cp-rank}. In the first part of the paper, we show that a completely positive rational factorization of such matrices can be computed in polynomial time, within any desired accuracy. We next consider binary quadratic programming problems of the following form: Given matrices $Q_1,...,Q_n\in\mathbb{R}_+^{n\times n}$, and a system of $m$ constrains $x^TQ_ix\le C_i^2$ ($x^TQ_ix\ge C_i^2$), $i=1,...,m$, we seek to find a vector $x^*\in \{0,1\}^n$ that maximizes (minimizes) a given function $f$. This class of problems generalizes many fundamental problems in discrete optimization such as packing and covering integer programs/knapsack problems, quadratic knapsack problems, submodular maximization, etc. We consider the case when $m$ and the cp-ranks of the matrices $Q_i$ are bounded by a constant. #R##N#Our approximation results for the maximization problem are as follows. For the case when the objective function is nonnegative submodular, we give an $(1/4-\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm, for any $\epsilon>0$; when the function $f$ is linear, we present a PTAS. We next extend our PTAS result to a wider class of non-linear objective functions including quadratic functions, multiplicative functions, and sum-of-ratio functions. The minimization problem seems to be much harder due to the fact that the relaxation is {\it not} convex. For this case, we give a QPTAS for $m=1$.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)