human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "user participation in an academic social networking service a survey of open group users on mendeley"
  Abstract: Although there are a number of social networking services that specifically target scholars, little has been published about the actual practices and the usage of these so-called academic social networking services (ASNSs). To fill this gap, we explore the populations of academics who engage in social activities using an ASNS; as an indicator of further engagement, we also determine their various motivations for joining a group in ASNSs. Using groups and their members in Mendeley as the platform for our case study, we obtained 146 participant responses from our online survey about users' common activities, usage habits, and motivations for joining groups. Our results show that 1) participants did not engage with social-based features as frequently and actively as they engaged with research-based features, and 2) users who joined more groups seemed to have a stronger motivation to increase their professional visibility and to contribute the research articles they had read to the group reading list. Our results generate interesting insights into Mendeley's user populations, their activities, and their motivations relative to the social features of Mendeley. We also argue that further design of ASNSs is needed to take greater account of disciplinary differences in scholarly communication and to establish incentive mechanisms for encouraging user participation.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "readership data and research impact"):
  with members:
    - "microsoft academic a multidisciplinary comparison of citation counts with scopus and mendeley for 29 journals"
    - "do researchgate scores create ghost academic reputations"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "on full text download and citation distributions in scientific scholarly journals"
    - "do mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited wos publications better than average citation impact of journals jcs"
    - "national research impact indicators from mendeley readers"
    - "tweets vs mendeley readers how do these two social media metrics differ"
    - "how well developed are altmetrics a cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "mendeley reader counts for us computer science conference papers and journal articles"):
  with members:
    - "google scholar web of science and scopus a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories"
    - "on the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and mendeley readership counts a large scale analysis of web of science publications"
    - "could scientists use altmetric com scores to predict longer term citation counts"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications"
    - "role of interdisciplinarity in computer sciences quantification impact and life trajectory"
    - "are the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions plausible for citation data"
    - "more precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "information exchange on an academic social networking site a multidiscipline comparison on researchgate q a"):
  with members:
    - "coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature"):
  with members:
    - "interpreting altmetrics viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories"
    - "validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact a study using data from altmetric and f1000prime"
    - "tweets vs mendeley readers how do these two social media metrics differ"
    - "do altmetrics correlate with citations extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective"
    - "tweets as impact indicators examining the implications of automated bot accounts on twitter"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "new data new possibilities exploring the insides of altmetric com"
    - "how well developed are altmetrics a cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "anatomy of scholarly information behavior patterns in the wake of academic social media platforms"):
  with members:
    - "recommendation of scholarly venues based on dynamic user interests"
    - "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "anatomy of scholarly information behavior patterns in the wake of social media"):
  with members:
    - "recommendation of scholarly venues based on dynamic user interests"
    - "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "networks of reader and country status an analysis of mendeley reader statistics"):
  with members:
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "journal portfolio analysis for countries cities and organizations maps and comparisons"
    - "visualization of co readership patterns from an online reference management system"
    - "alternative metrics in scientometrics a meta analysis of research into three altmetrics"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "science visualization and discursive knowledge"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)