human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator i3"
  Abstract: We tested Rousseau's (in press) recent proposal to define percentile classes in the case of the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) so that the largest number in a set always belongs to the highest (100th) percentile rank class. In the case a set of nine uncited papers and one with citation, however, the uncited papers would all be placed in the 90th percentile rank. A lowly-cited document set would thus be advantaged when compared with a highly-cited one. Notwithstanding our reservations, we extended the program for computing I3 in Web-of-Science data (at this http URL) with this option; the quantiles without a correction are now the default. As Rousseau mentions, excellence indicators (e.g., the top-10%) can be considered as special cases of I3: only two percentile rank classes are distinguished for the evaluation. Both excellence and impact indicators can be tested statistically using the z-test for independent proportions.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "an evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact and a proposal for making them better"):
  with members:
    - "heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation"
    - "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"
    - "plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph"
    - "how are excellent highly cited papers defined in bibliometrics a quantitative analysis of the literature"
    - "the substantive and practical significance of citation impact differences between institutions guidelines for the analysis of percentiles using effect sizes and confidence intervals"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "how to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully a proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations"
    - "which percentile based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values an empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation rank approach p100"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators"):
  with members:
    - "which differences can be expected when two universities in the leiden ranking are compared some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations"
    - "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"
    - "revisiting relative indicators and provisional truths"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "how are excellent highly cited papers defined in bibliometrics a quantitative analysis of the literature"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the integrated impact indicator i3 revisited a non parametric alternative to the journal impact factor"):
  with members:
    - "discontinuities in citation relations among journals self organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change"
    - "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"
    - "use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles need not be wrong"
    - "can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers a large scale empirical study based on researcherid data"
    - "citations indicators of quality the impact fallacy"
    - "how are excellent highly cited papers defined in bibliometrics a quantitative analysis of the literature"
    - "the substantive and practical significance of citation impact differences between institutions guidelines for the analysis of percentiles using effect sizes and confidence intervals"
    - "the academic trace of the performance matrix a mathematical synthesis of the h index and the integrated impact indicator i3"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "citations indicators of quality the impact fallacy"):
  with members:
    - "introducing citedreferencesexplorer crexplorer a program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization"
    - "identification of long term concept symbols among citations can documents be clustered in terms of common intellectual histories"
    - "interpreting altmetrics viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories"
    - "quantifying the cognitive extent of science"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "the role of handbooks in knowledge creation and diffusion a case of science and technology studies"
    - "citnetexplorer a new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks"
    - "detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy rpys"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "how to improve the outcome of performance evaluations in terms of percentiles for citation frequencies of my papers"):
  with members:
    - "examples for counterintuitive behavior of the new citation rank indicator p100 for bibliometric evaluations"
    - "empirical evidence for the relevance of fractional scoring in the calculation of percentile rank scores"
    - "the normalization of citation counts based on classification systems"
    - "which percentile based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values an empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation rank approach p100"
    - "how much do different ways of calculating percentiles influence the derived performance indicators a case study"
    - "on the calculation of percentile based bibliometric indicators"
    - "the use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data opportunities and limits"
    - "accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the tournaments metaphor in citation impact studies power weakness ratios pwr as a journal indicator"):
  with members:
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "information metrics imetrics a research specialty with a socio cognitive identity"
    - "a further step forward in measuring journals scientific prestige the sjr2 indicator"
    - "a recursive field normalized bibliometric performance indicator an application to the field of library and information science"
    - "how journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research a comparison between innovation studies and business management"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"
    - "weighted citation an indicator of an article s prestige"
    - "caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the cwts leiden evaluations of research performance"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "the substantive and practical significance of citation impact differences between institutions guidelines for the analysis of percentiles using effect sizes and confidence intervals"):
  with members:
    - "how to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences an empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects"
    - "on the calculation of percentile based bibliometric indicators"
    - "the use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data opportunities and limits"
    - "accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks"
    - "the citation based indicator and combined impact indicator new options for measuring impact"
    - "the leiden ranking 2011 2012 data collection indicators and interpretation"
    - "caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the cwts leiden evaluations of research performance"
    - "rivals for the crown reply to opthof and leydesdorff"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "which percentile based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values an empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation rank approach p100"):
  with members:
    - "empirical evidence for the relevance of fractional scoring in the calculation of percentile rank scores"
    - "how to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences an empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects"
    - "how much do different ways of calculating percentiles influence the derived performance indicators a case study"
    - "on the calculation of percentile based bibliometric indicators"
    - "the use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data opportunities and limits"
    - "accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks"
    - "the citation based indicator and combined impact indicator new options for measuring impact"
    - "a further step forward in measuring journals scientific prestige the sjr2 indicator"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CY(Computers and Society)