human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the 1 1 elitist black box complexity of leadingones"
  Abstract: One important goal of black-box complexity theory is the development of complexity models allowing to derive meaningful lower bounds for whole classes of randomized search heuristics. Complementing classical runtime analysis, black-box models help us understand how algorithmic choices such as the population size, the variation operators, or the selection rules influence the optimization time. One example for such a result is the $\Omega(n \log n)$ lower bound for unary unbiased algorithms on functions with a unique global optimum [Lehre/Witt, GECCO 2010], which tells us that higher arity operators or biased sampling strategies are needed when trying to beat this bound. In lack of analyzing techniques, almost no non-trivial bounds are known for other restricted models. Proving such bounds therefore remains to be one of the main challenges in black-box complexity theory. #R##N#With this paper we contribute to our technical toolbox for lower bound computations by proposing a new type of information-theoretic argument. We regard the permutation- and bit-invariant version of \textsc{LeadingOnes} and prove that its (1+1) elitist black-box complexity is $\Omega(n^2)$, a bound that is matched by (1+1)-type evolutionary algorithms. The (1+1) elitist complexity of \textsc{LeadingOnes} is thus considerably larger than its unrestricted one, which is known to be of order $n\log\log n$ [Afshani et al., 2013].

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "benchmarking discrete optimization heuristics with iohprofiler"):
  with members:
    - "offspring population size matters when comparing evolutionary algorithms with self adjusting mutation rates"
    - "interpolating local and global search by controlling the variance of standard bit mutation"
    - "hyper parameter tuning for the 1 λ λ ga"
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"
    - "better runtime guarantees via stochastic domination"
    - "theory of estimation of distribution algorithms"
    - "complexity theory for discrete black box optimization heuristics"
    - "towards a theory guided benchmarking suite for discrete black box optimization heuristics profiling 1 λ ea variants on onemax and leadingones"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "complexity theory for discrete black box optimization heuristics"):
  with members:
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"
    - "runtime analysis of the 1 λ λ genetic algorithm on random satisfiable 3 cnf formulas"
    - "onemax in black box models with several restrictions"
    - "optimal parameter choices through self adjustment applying the 1 5 th rule in discrete settings"
    - "ranking based black box complexity"
    - "reducing the arity in unbiased black box complexity"
    - "a new method for lower bounds on the running time of evolutionary algorithms"
    - "playing mastermind with constant size memory"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "simple hyper heuristics control the neighbourhood size of randomised local search optimally for leadingones"):
  with members:
    - "theory of parameter control for discrete black box optimization provable performance gains through dynamic parameter choices"
    - "self adjusting mutation rates with provably optimal success rules"
    - "better runtime guarantees via stochastic domination"
    - "significance based estimation of distribution algorithms"
    - "standard steady state genetic algorithms can hillclimb faster than mutation only evolutionary algorithms"
    - "level based analysis of genetic algorithms and other search processes"
    - "algorithm selection for combinatorial search problems a survey"
    - "pure strategy or mixed strategy"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the query complexity of a permutation based variant of mastermind"):
  with members:
    - "complexity theory for discrete black box optimization heuristics"
    - "playing mastermind with many colors"
    - "faster black box algorithms through higher arity operators"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on the effectiveness of simple success based parameter selection mechanisms for two classical discrete black box optimization benchmark problems"):
  with members:
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)