human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "universality of citation distributions revisited"
  Abstract: Radicchi, Fortunato, and Castellano [arXiv:0806.0974, PNAS 105(45), 17268] claim that, apart from a scaling factor, all fields of science are characterized by the same citation distribution. We present a large-scale validation study of this universality-of-citation-distributions claim. Our analysis shows that claiming citation distributions to be universal for all fields of science is not warranted. Although many fields indeed seem to have fairly similar citation distributions, there are quite some exceptions as well. We also briefly discuss the consequences of our findings for the measurement of scientific impact using citation-based bibliometric indicators.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "testing for universality of mendeley readership distributions"):
  with members:
    - "predicting publication long term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor"
    - "revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement"
    - "an investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level"
    - "skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions a large scale empirical analysis based on web of science data"
    - "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature"
    - "do altmetrics correlate with citations extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective"
    - "how well developed are altmetrics a cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications"
    - "revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators"):
  with members:
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "citation analysis with microsoft academic"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a comparison of university performance scores and ranks by mncs and fss"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "quality versus quantity in scientific impact"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles need not be wrong"):
  with members:
    - "are the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions plausible for citation data"
    - "the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data best options for modelling and regression"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "a further step forward in measuring journals scientific prestige the sjr2 indicator"
    - "impact factor outdated artefact or stepping stone to journal certification"
    - "some modifications to the snip journal impact indicator"
    - "citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality could the latter ever be preferable"
    - "measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "unraveling the dynamics of growth aging and inflation for citations to scientific articles from specific research fields"):
  with members:
    - "a preferential attachment paradox how does preferential attachment combine with growth to produce networks with log normal in degree distributions"
    - "growing complex network of citations of scientific papers modeling and measurements"
    - "publication boost in web of science journals and its effect on citation distributions"
    - "the memory of science inflation myopia and the knowledge network"
    - "quantifying long term scientific impact"
    - "rescaling citations of publications in physics"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "are the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions plausible for citation data"):
  with members:
    - "publication boost in web of science journals and its effect on citation distributions"
    - "the precision of the arithmetic mean geometric mean and percentiles for citation data an experimental simulation modelling approach"
    - "the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data best options for modelling and regression"
    - "regression for citation data an evaluation of different methods"
    - "distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years"
    - "power laws in citation distributions evidence from scopus"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"
    - "towards a new crown indicator an empirical analysis"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"):
  with members:
    - "a sensitivity analysis of researchers productivity rankings to the time of citation observation"
    - "the precision of the arithmetic mean geometric mean and percentiles for citation data an experimental simulation modelling approach"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"
    - "measuring academic influence not all citations are equal"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non experts the case of two snip versions"
    - "methods for estimating the size of google scholar"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "field normalized impact factors a comparison of rescaling versus fractionally counted ifs"):
  with members:
    - "the weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers citations in the digital age"
    - "alternatives to the journal impact factor i3 and the top 10 or top 25 of the most highly cited papers"
    - "impact factor outdated artefact or stepping stone to journal certification"
    - "the leiden ranking 2011 2012 data collection indicators and interpretation"
    - "edited volumes monographs and book chapters in the book citation index bkci and science citation index sci sosci a hci"
    - "how can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science an assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts"
    - "fractional counting of citations in research evaluation a cross and interdisciplinary assessment of the tsinghua university in beijing"
    - "testing differences statistically with the leiden ranking"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "how can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science an assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts"):
  with members:
    - "alternatives to the journal impact factor i3 and the top 10 or top 25 of the most highly cited papers"
    - "accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks"
    - "impact factor outdated artefact or stepping stone to journal certification"
    - "percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator i3"
    - "fractional counting of citations in research evaluation a cross and interdisciplinary assessment of the tsinghua university in beijing"
    - "an evaluation of impacts in nanoscience nanotechnology steps towards standards for citation analysis"
    - "how journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research a comparison between innovation studies and business management"
    - "scopus s source normalized impact per paper snip versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)