human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "efficient logging in non volatile memory by exploiting coherency protocols"
  Abstract: Non-volatile memory technologies such as PCM, ReRAM and STT-RAM allow data to be saved to persistent storage significantly faster than hard drives or SSDs. Many of the use cases for non-volatile memory requires persistent logging since it enables a set of operations to execute in an atomic manner. However, a logging protocol must handle reordering, which causes a write to reach the non-volatile memory before a previous write operation.     In this paper, we show that reordering results from two parts of the system: the out-of-order execution in the CPU and the cache coherence protocol. By carefully considering the properties of these reorderings, we present a logging protocol that requires only one round trip to non-volatile memory while avoiding expensive computations, thus increasing performance. We also show how the logging protocol can be extended to building a durable set (hash map) that also requires a single round trip to non-volatile memory for inserting, updating, or deleting operations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "efficient lock free durable sets"):
  with members:
    - "alpaca intermittent execution without checkpoints"
    - "fine grain checkpointing with in cache line logging"
    - "delay free concurrency on faulty persistent memory"
    - "reclaiming memory for lock free data structures there has to be a better way"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "recipe converting concurrent dram indexes to persistent memory indexes"):
  with members:
    - "fine grain checkpointing with in cache line logging"
    - "basic performance measurements of the intel optane dc persistent memory module"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "delay free concurrency on faulty persistent memory"):
  with members:
    - "multiversion concurrency with bounded delay and precise garbage collection"
    - "the parallel persistent memory model"
    - "flat combining and the synchronization parallelism tradeoff"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)