human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "optimal direct sum and privacy trade off results for quantum and classical communication complexity"
  Abstract: We show optimal Direct Sum result for the one-way entanglement-assisted quantum communication complexity for any relation f subset of X x Y x Z. We show: Q^{1,pub}(f^m) = Omega(m Q^{1,pub}(f)), where Q^{1,pub}(f), represents the one-way entanglement-assisted quantum communication complexity of f with error at most 1/3 and f^m represents m-copies of f. Similarly for the one-way public-coin classical communication complexity we show: R^{1,pub}(f^m) = Omega(m R^{1,pub}(f)), where R^{1,pub}(f), represents the one-way public-coin classical communication complexity of f with error at most 1/3. We show similar optimal Direct Sum results for the Simultaneous Message Passing quantum and classical models. For two-way protocols we present optimal Privacy Trade-off results leading to a Weak Direct Sum result for such protocols. We show our Direct Sum and Privacy Trade-off results via message compression arguments which also imply a new round elimination lemma in quantum communication. This allows us to extend classical lower bounds on the cell probe complexity of some data structure problems, e.g. Approximate Nearest Neighbor Searching on the Hamming cube {0,1}^n and Predecessor Search to the quantum setting. In a separate result we show that Newman's technique of reducing the number of public-coins in a classical protocol cannot be lifted to the quantum setting. We do this by defining a general notion of black-box reduction of prior entanglement that subsumes Newman's technique. We prove that such a black-box reduction is impossible for quantum protocols. In the final result in the theme of message compression, we provide an upper bound on the problem of Exact Remote State Preparation.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a discrepancy lower bound for information complexity"):
  with members:
    - "lower bounds on information complexity via zero communication protocols and applications"
    - "information equals amortized communication"
    - "a strong direct product theorem for two way public coin communication complexity"
    - "a strong direct product theorem for disjointness"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)