human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "notes on the design of an internet adversary"
  Abstract: HP Labs, Palo Alto, CAAbstract. The design of the defenses Internetsystems can deploy againstattack, especially adaptive and resilient defenses, must start from a real-istic model of the threat. This requires an assessment of the capabilitiesof the adversary. The design typically evolves through a process of sim-ulating both the system and the adversary. This requires the design andimplementation of a simulated adversary based on the capability assess-ment. Consensus on the capabilities of a suitable adversary is not evident.Part of the recent redesign of the protocol used by peers in the LOCKSSdigital preservation system included a conservative assessment of the ad-versary’s capabilities. We present our assessment and the implicationswe drew from it as a step towards a reusable adversary speciﬁcation.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the security reference architecture for blockchains towards a standardized model for studying vulnerabilities threats and defenses"):
  with members:
    - "ekiden a platform for confidentiality preserving trustworthy and performant smart contracts"
    - "a survey on ethereum systems security vulnerabilities attacks and defenses"
    - "security and privacy on blockchain"
    - "deconstructing blockchains a comprehensive survey on consensus membership and structure"
    - "truffle tests for free replaying ethereum smart contracts for transparency"
    - "blockchain technologies for the internet of things research issues and challenges"
    - "exploring the attack surface of blockchain a systematic overview"
    - "strongchain transparent and collaborative proof of work consensus"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a security reference architecture for blockchains"):
  with members:
    - "ekiden a platform for confidentiality preserving trustworthy and performant smart contracts"
    - "strongchain transparent and collaborative proof of work consensus"
    - "insight into insiders and it a survey of insider threat taxonomies analysis modeling and countermeasures"
    - "dfinity technology overview series consensus system"
    - "short paper towards more reliable bitcoin timestamps"
    - "the latest gossip on bft consensus"
    - "finding the greedy prodigal and suicidal contracts at scale"
    - "sabre protecting bitcoin against routing attacks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)