human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "online job scheduling with redundancy and opportunistic checkpointing a speedup function based analysis"
  Abstract: In a large-scale computing cluster, the job completions can be substantially delayed due to two sources of variability, namely, variability in the job size and that in the machine service capacity. To tackle this issue, existing works have proposed various scheduling algorithms which exploit redundancy wherein a job runs on multiple servers until the first completes. In this paper, we explore the impact of variability in the machine service capacity and adopt a rigorous analytical approach to design scheduling algorithms using redundancy and checkpointing. We design several online scheduling algorithms which can dynamically vary the number of redundant copies for jobs. We also provide new theoretical performance bounds for these algorithms in terms of the overall job flowtime by introducing the notion of a speedup function, based on which a novel potential function can be defined to enable the corresponding competitive ratio analysis. In particular, by adopting the online primal-dual fitting approach, we prove that our SRPT+R Algorithm in a non-multitasking cluster is $(1+\epsilon)$-speed, $\ O(\frac{1}{\epsilon})$-competitive. We also show that our proposed Fair+R and LAPS+R($\beta$) Algorithms for a multitasking cluster are $(4+\epsilon)$-speed, $\ O(\frac{1}{\epsilon})$-competitive and {($2 + 2\beta + 2\epsilon)$-speed $O(\frac{1}{\beta \epsilon})$-competitive} respectively. We demonstrate via extensive simulations that our proposed algorithms can significantly reduce job flowtime under both the non-multitasking and multitasking modes.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "distributed redundancy scheduling for microservice based applications at the edge"):
  with members:
    - "kubernetes as an availability manager for microservice applications"
    - "spatio temporal edge service placement a bandit learning approach"
    - "follow me at the edge mobility aware dynamic service placement for mobile edge computing"
    - "a survey on mobile edge computing the communication perspective"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)