human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "interdiction in practice hardware trojan against a high security usb flash drive"
  Abstract: As part of the revelations about the NSA activities, the notion of interdiction has become known to the public: the interception of deliveries to manipulate hardware in a way that backdoors are introduced. Manipulations can occur on the firmware or at hardware level. With respect to hardware, FPGAs are particular interesting targets as they can be altered by manipulating the corresponding bitstream which configures the device. In this paper, we demonstrate the first successful real-world FPGA hardware Trojan insertion into a commercial product. On the target device, a FIPS-140-2 level 2 certified USB flash drive from Kingston, the user data are encrypted using AES-256 in XTS mode, and the encryption/decryption is processed by an off-the-shelf SRAM-based FPGA. Our investigation required two reverse-engineering steps, related to the proprietary FPGA bitstream and to the firmware of the underlying ARM CPU. In our Trojan insertion scenario, the targeted USB flash drive is intercepted before being delivered to the victim. The physical Trojan insertion requires the manipulation of the SPI flash memory content, which contains the FPGA bitstream as well as the ARM CPU code. The FPGA bitstream manipulation alters the exploited AES-256 algorithm in a way that it turns into a linear function which can be broken with 32 known plaintext–ciphertext pairs. After the manipulated USB flash drive has been used by the victim, the attacker is able to obtain all user data from the ciphertexts. Our work indeed highlights the security risks and especially the practical relevance of bitstream modification attacks that became realistic due to FPGA bitstream manipulations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hardware security for and beyond cmos technology an overview on fundamentals applications and challenges"):
  with members:
    - "towards secure composition of integrated circuits and electronic systems on the role of eda"
    - "exploiting spin orbit torque devices as reconfigurable logic for circuit obfuscation"
    - "smart secure magnetoelectric antiferromagnet based tamper proof non volatile memory"
    - "a modern approach to ip protection and trojan prevention split manufacturing for 3d ics and obfuscation of vertical interconnects"
    - "a new paradigm in split manufacturing lock the feol unlock at the beol"
    - "spin orbit torque devices for hardware security from deterministic to probabilistic regime"
    - "protect your chip design intellectual property an overview"
    - "zombieload cross privilege boundary data sampling"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "boosting the bounds of symbolic qed for effective pre silicon verification of processor cores"):
  with members:
    - "symbolic qed pre silicon verification for automotive microcontroller cores industrial case study"
    - "3d integration another dimension toward hardware security"
    - "trojanzero switching activity aware design of undetectable hardware trojans with zero power and area footprint"
    - "logic bug detection and localization using symbolic quick error detection"
    - "e qed electrical bug localization during post silicon validation enabled by quick error detection and formal methods"
    - "advancing the state of the art in hardware trojans design"
    - "tpad hardware trojan prevention and detection for trusted integrated circuits"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "insights into the mind of a trojan designer the challenge to integrate a trojan into the bitstream"):
  with members:
    - "a look at the dark side of hardware reverse engineering a case study"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "stealthy opaque predicates in hardware obfuscating constant expressions at negligible overhead"):
  with members:
    - "physical design obfuscation of hardware a comprehensive investigation of device and logic level techniques"
    - "a look at the dark side of hardware reverse engineering a case study"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "hardware reverse engineering overview and open challenges"):
  with members:
    - "physical design obfuscation of hardware a comprehensive investigation of device and logic level techniques"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)