human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "weakly submodular maximization beyond cardinality constraints does randomization help greedy"
  Abstract: Submodular functions are a broad class of set functions, which naturally arise in diverse areas. Many algorithms have been suggested for the maximization of these functions. Unfortunately, once the function deviates from submodularity, the known algorithms may perform arbitrarily poorly. Amending this issue, by obtaining approximation results for set functions generalizing submodular functions, has been the focus of recent works. #R##N#One such class, known as weakly submodular functions, has received a lot of attention. A key result proved by Das and Kempe (2011) showed that the approximation ratio of the greedy algorithm for weakly submodular maximization subject to a cardinality constraint degrades smoothly with the distance from submodularity. However, no results have been obtained for maximization subject to constraints beyond cardinality. In particular, it is not known whether the greedy algorithm achieves any non-trivial approximation ratio for such constraints. #R##N#In this paper, we prove that a randomized version of the greedy algorithm (previously used by Buchbinder et al. (2014) for a different problem) achieves an approximation ratio of $(1 + 1/\gamma)^{-2}$ for the maximization of a weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint, where $\gamma$ is a parameter measuring the distance of the function from submodularity. Moreover, we also experimentally compare the performance of this version of the greedy algorithm on real world problems against natural benchmarks, and show that the algorithm we study performs well also in practice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm with a non-trivial approximation guarantee for maximizing a weakly submodular function subject to a constraint other than the simple cardinality constraint. In particular, it is the first algorithm with such a guarantee for the important and broad class of matroid constraints.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "black box submodular maximization discrete and continuous settings"):
  with members:
    - "introduction to online convex optimization"
    - "online continuous submodular maximization from full information to bandit feedback"
    - "optimal dr submodular maximization and applications to provable mean field inference"
    - "black box adversarial attacks with limited queries and information"
    - "discrete adversarial attacks and submodular optimization with applications to text classification"
    - "gradient methods for submodular maximization"
    - "continuous dr submodular maximization structure and algorithms"
    - "robust budget allocation via continuous submodular functions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "beyond submodular maximization"):
  with members:
    - "distributed maximization of submodular plus diversity functions for multi label feature selection on huge datasets"
    - "online submodular welfare maximization greedy beats 1 2 in random order"
    - "guarantees for greedy maximization of non submodular functions with applications"
    - "local search for max sum diversification"
    - "max sum diversification monotone submodular functions and semi metric spaces"
    - "max sum diversity via convex programming"
    - "building a good team secretary problems and the supermodular degree"
    - "a new framework for distributed submodular maximization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "submodular cost submodular cover with an approximate oracle"):
  with members:
    - "cost effective seed selection in online social networks"
    - "why approximate when you can get the exact optimal targeted viral marketing at scale"
    - "guarantees for greedy maximization of non submodular functions with applications"
    - "scalable bicriteria algorithms for the threshold activation problem in online social networks"
    - "submodular optimization under noise"
    - "an efficient streaming algorithm for the submodular cover problem"
    - "noisy submodular maximization via adaptive sampling with applications to crowdsourced image collection summarization"
    - "influence maximization near optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "non submodular function maximization subject to a matroid constraint with applications"):
  with members:
    - "submodular maximization beyond non negativity guarantees fast algorithms and applications"
    - "steering social activity a stochastic optimal control point of view"
    - "equity of attention amortizing individual fairness in rankings"
    - "deep reinforcement learning of marked temporal point processes"
    - "fairness of exposure in rankings"
    - "combinatorial penalties which structures are preserved by convex relaxations"
    - "gradient methods for submodular maximization"
    - "guarantees for greedy maximization of non submodular functions with applications"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on maximization of weakly modular functions guarantees of multi stage algorithms tractability and hardness"):
  with members:
    - "beyond submodular maximization"
    - "fast parallel algorithms for feature selection"
    - "submodular maximization beyond non negativity guarantees fast algorithms and applications"
    - "an exponential speedup in parallel running time for submodular maximization without loss in approximation"
    - "greed is still good maximizing monotone submodular supermodular functions"
    - "fast greedy algorithms for dictionary selection with generalized sparsity constraints"
    - "pmlb a large benchmark suite for machine learning evaluation and comparison"
    - "guarantees for greedy maximization of non submodular functions with applications"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)