human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on the distortion of voting with multiple representative candidates"
  Abstract: We study positional voting rules when candidates and voters are embedded in a common metric space, and cardinal preferences are naturally given by distances in the metric space. In a positional voting rule, each candidate receives a score from each ballot based on the ballot's rank order; the candidate with the highest total score wins the election. The cost of a candidate is his sum of distances to all voters, and the distortion of an election is the ratio between the cost of the elected candidate and the cost of the optimum candidate. We consider the case when candidates are representative of the population, in the sense that they are drawn i.i.d. from the population of the voters, and analyze the expected distortion of positional voting rules. #R##N#Our main result is a clean and tight characterization of positional voting rules that have constant expected distortion (independent of the number of candidates and the metric space). Our characterization result immediately implies constant expected distortion for Borda Count and elections in which each voter approves a constant fraction of all candidates. On the other hand, we obtain super-constant expected distortion for Plurality, Veto, and approving a constant number of candidates. These results contrast with previous results on voting with metric preferences: When the candidates are chosen adversarially, all of the preceding voting rules have distortion linear in the number of candidates or voters. Thus, the model of representative candidates allows us to distinguish voting rules which seem equally bad in the worst case.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "peeking behind the ordinal curtain improving distortion via cardinal queries"):
  with members:
    - "improved metric distortion for deterministic social choice rules"
    - "the distortion of distributed voting"
    - "awareness of voter passion greatly improves the distortion of metric social choice"
    - "approval based elections and distortion of voting rules"
    - "an analysis framework for metric voting based on lp duality"
    - "on the distortion value of the elections with abstention"
    - "random dictators with a random referee constant sample complexity mechanisms for social choice"
    - "ordinal approximation for social choice matching and facility location problems given candidate positions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "communication distortion and randomness in metric voting"):
  with members:
    - "comparing election methods where each voter ranks only few candidates"
    - "improved metric distortion for deterministic social choice rules"
    - "approval based elections and distortion of voting rules"
    - "an analysis framework for metric voting based on lp duality"
    - "random dictators with a random referee constant sample complexity mechanisms for social choice"
    - "of the people voting is more effective with representative candidates"
    - "combinatorial auctions do need modest interaction"
    - "metric distortion of social choice rules lower bounds and fairness properties"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "awareness of voter passion greatly improves the distortion of metric social choice"):
  with members:
    - "improved metric distortion for deterministic social choice rules"
    - "the distortion of distributed voting"
    - "manipulating elections by selecting issues"
    - "peeking behind the ordinal curtain improving distortion via cardinal queries"
    - "approval based elections and distortion of voting rules"
    - "on the distortion value of the elections with abstention"
    - "random dictators with a random referee constant sample complexity mechanisms for social choice"
    - "ordinal approximation for social choice matching and facility location problems given candidate positions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "improved metric distortion for deterministic social choice rules"):
  with members:
    - "ordinal approximation for social choice matching and facility location problems given candidate positions"
    - "relating metric distortion and fairness of social choice rules"
    - "tradeoffs between information and ordinal approximation for bipartite matching"
    - "of the people voting is more effective with representative candidates"
    - "metric distortion of social choice rules lower bounds and fairness properties"
    - "randomized social choice functions under metric preferences"
    - "on voting and facility location"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "an analysis framework for metric voting based on lp duality"):
  with members:
    - "improved metric distortion for deterministic social choice rules"
    - "communication distortion and randomness in metric voting"
    - "a duality based unified approach to bayesian mechanism design"
    - "of the people voting is more effective with representative candidates"
    - "metric distortion of social choice rules lower bounds and fairness properties"
    - "randomized social choice functions under metric preferences"
    - "on voting and facility location"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "ordinal approximation for social choice matching and facility location problems given candidate positions"):
  with members:
    - "tradeoffs between information and ordinal approximation for bipartite matching"
    - "sequential deliberation for social choice"
    - "of the people voting is more effective with representative candidates"
    - "combinatorial secretary problems with ordinal information"
    - "truthful mechanisms for matching and clustering in an ordinal world"
    - "metric distortion of social choice rules lower bounds and fairness properties"
    - "truthful facility assignment with resource augmentation an exact analysis of serial dictatorship"
    - "randomized social choice functions under metric preferences"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)