human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "analysis of classifiers robustness to adversarial perturbations"
  Abstract: The goal of this paper is to analyze an intriguing phenomenon recently discovered in deep networks, namely their instability to adversarial perturbations (Szegedy et. al., 2014). We provide a theoretical framework for analyzing the robustness of classifiers to adversarial perturbations, and show fundamental upper bounds on the robustness of classifiers. Specifically, we establish a general upper bound on the robustness of classifiers to adversarial perturbations, and then illustrate the obtained upper bound on the families of linear and quadratic classifiers. In both cases, our upper bound depends on a distinguishability measure that captures the notion of difficulty of the classification task. Our results for both classes imply that in tasks involving small distinguishability, no classifier in the considered set will be robust to adversarial perturbations, even if a good accuracy is achieved. Our theoretical framework moreover suggests that the phenomenon of adversarial instability is due to the low flexibility of classifiers, compared to the difficulty of the classification task (captured by the distinguishability). Moreover, we show the existence of a clear distinction between the robustness of a classifier to random noise and its robustness to adversarial perturbations. Specifically, the former is shown to be larger than the latter by a factor that is proportional to \sqrt{d} (with d being the signal dimension) for linear classifiers. This result gives a theoretical explanation for the discrepancy between the two robustness properties in high dimensional problems, which was empirically observed in the context of neural networks. To the best of our knowledge, our results provide the first theoretical work that addresses the phenomenon of adversarial instability recently observed for deep networks. Our analysis is complemented by experimental results on controlled and real-world data.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "metrics and methods for robustness evaluation of neural networks with generative models"):
  with members:
    - "using videos to evaluate image model robustness"
    - "seeing what a gan cannot generate"
    - "adversarial examples are a natural consequence of test error in noise"
    - "natural adversarial examples"
    - "image synthesis with a single robust classifier"
    - "benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations"
    - "towards photographic image manipulation with balanced growing of generative autoencoders"
    - "optimization and abstraction a synergistic approach for analyzing neural network robustness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ensembles of many diverse weak defenses can be strong defending deep neural networks against adversarial attacks"):
  with members:
    - "one pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks"
    - "simple black box adversarial attacks"
    - "on evaluating adversarial robustness"
    - "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning"
    - "why do adversarial attacks transfer explaining transferability of evasion and poisoning attacks"
    - "no need to worry about adversarial examples in object detection in autonomous vehicles"
    - "enhancing robustness of machine learning systems via data transformations"
    - "keeping the bad guys out protecting and vaccinating deep learning with jpeg compression"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "understanding and mitigating the tradeoff between robustness and accuracy"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial robustness may be at odds with simplicity"
    - "are labels required for improving adversarial robustness"
    - "theoretically principled trade off between robustness and accuracy"
    - "unsupervised data augmentation for consistency training"
    - "a fourier perspective on model robustness in computer vision"
    - "generating natural language adversarial examples"
    - "adversarially robust generalization requires more data"
    - "exploring the landscape of spatial robustness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "adversarial examples opportunities and challenges"):
  with members:
    - "one pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks"
    - "atmpa attacking machine learning based malware visualization detection methods via adversarial examples"
    - "hcic hardware assisted control flow integrity checking"
    - "adversarial examples versus cloud based detectors a black box empirical study"
    - "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning"
    - "the malicious use of artificial intelligence forecasting prevention and mitigation"
    - "adversarial attacks against medical deep learning systems"
    - "targeted adversarial examples for black box audio systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "semantic adversarial attacks parametric transformations that fool deep classifiers"):
  with members:
    - "spatially transformed adversarial examples"
    - "bdd100k a diverse driving video database with scalable annotation tooling"
    - "robustness via curvature regularization and vice versa"
    - "defense gan protecting classifiers against adversarial attacks using generative models"
    - "fast geometrically perturbed adversarial faces"
    - "adversarial vulnerability for any classifier"
    - "adversarial generative nets neural network attacks on state of the art face recognition"
    - "targeted nonlinear adversarial perturbations in images and videos"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adversarial examples for deep learning cyber security analytics"):
  with members:
    - "robust audio adversarial example for a physical attack"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "on designing machine learning models for malicious network traffic classification"
    - "rallying adversarial techniques against deep learning for network security"
    - "evading classifiers in discrete domains with provable optimality guarantees"
    - "kitsune an ensemble of autoencoders for online network intrusion detection"
    - "black box generation of adversarial text sequences to evade deep learning classifiers"
    - "deceiving end to end deep learning malware detectors using adversarial examples"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "ml loo detecting adversarial examples with feature attribution"):
  with members:
    - "on the in fidelity and sensitivity for explanations"
    - "adv bnn improved adversarial defense through robust bayesian neural network"
    - "characterizing adversarial subspaces using local intrinsic dimensionality"
    - "training verified learners with learned verifiers"
    - "rob gan generator discriminator and adversarial attacker"
    - "adversarial learning and explainability in structured datasets"
    - "attacks meet interpretability attribute steered detection of adversarial samples"
    - "concise and stable explanations using adversarial training"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "a kernelized manifold mapping to diminish the effect of adversarial perturbations"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial risk and the dangers of evaluating against weak attacks"
    - "vulnerability analysis of chest x ray image classification against adversarial attacks"
    - "stochastic activation pruning for robust adversarial defense"
    - "characterizing adversarial subspaces using local intrinsic dimensionality"
    - "blind pre processing a robust defense method against adversarial examples"
    - "towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on mnist"
    - "defense gan protecting classifiers against adversarial attacks using generative models"
    - "adversarial spheres"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)