human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "adversarial examples are not easily detected bypassing ten detection methods"
  Abstract: Neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples: inputs that are close to natural inputs but classified incorrectly. In order to better understand the space of adversarial examples, we survey ten recent proposals that are designed for detection and compare their efficacy. We show that all can be defeated by constructing new loss functions. We conclude that adversarial examples are significantly harder to detect than previously appreciated, and the properties believed to be intrinsic to adversarial examples are in fact not. Finally, we propose several simple guidelines for evaluating future proposed defenses.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey"):
  with members:
    - "securing future autonomous connected vehicles challenges posed by adversarial machine learning and the way forward"
    - "reproducibility in machine learning for health"
    - "fairness in algorithmic decision making an excursion through the lens of causality"
    - "caveat emptor the risks of using big data for human development"
    - "motion corrected multishot mri reconstruction using generative networks with sensitivity encoding"
    - "the adversarial machine learning conundrum can the insecurity of ml become the achilles heel of cognitive networks"
    - "self supervised domain adaptation for computer vision tasks"
    - "feature robustness in non stationary health records caveats to deployable model performance in common clinical machine learning tasks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "anomalous instance detection in deep learning a survey"):
  with members:
    - "unmask adversarial detection and defense through robust feature alignment"
    - "a research agenda dynamic models to defend against correlated attacks"
    - "analysis of confident classifiers for out of distribution detection"
    - "adversarial attacks on time series"
    - "adversarial attacks on deep neural networks for time series classification"
    - "mimicgan robust projection onto image manifolds with corruption mimicking"
    - "analyzing adversarial attacks against deep learning for intrusion detection in iot networks"
    - "deep learning for anomaly detection a survey"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning"):
  with members:
    - "fast is better than free revisiting adversarial training"
    - "adversarial training and robustness for multiple perturbations"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "deep double descent where bigger models and more data hurt"
    - "wasserstein adversarial examples via projected sinkhorn iterations"
    - "are labels required for improving adversarial robustness"
    - "adversarially robust generalization just requires more unlabeled data"
    - "me net towards effective adversarial robustness with matrix estimation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence"):
  with members:
    - "towards ground truth evaluation of visual explanations"
    - "continual lifelong learning with neural networks a review"
    - "programmable neural network trojan for pre trained feature extractor"
    - "hidden trigger backdoor attacks"
    - "adversarial attacks and defenses in images graphs and text a review"
    - "on evaluating adversarial robustness"
    - "explainable ai for trees from local explanations to global understanding"
    - "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "black box smoothing a provable defense for pretrained classifiers"):
  with members:
    - "macer attack free and scalable robust training via maximizing certified radius"
    - "tight certificates of adversarial robustness for randomly smoothed classifiers"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "simple black box adversarial attacks"
    - "a convex relaxation barrier to tight robustness verification of neural networks"
    - "scaling provable adversarial defenses"
    - "ffdnet toward a fast and flexible solution for cnn based image denoising"
    - "adversarial risk and the dangers of evaluating against weak attacks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "fast is better than free revisiting adversarial training"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial training and robustness for multiple perturbations"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "me net towards effective adversarial robustness with matrix estimation"
    - "provably robust deep learning via adversarially trained smoothed classifiers"
    - "adversarial training for free"
    - "adversarial robustness against the union of multiple perturbation models"
    - "on evaluating adversarial robustness"
    - "scaling provable adversarial defenses"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing"):
  with members:
    - "input prioritization for testing neural networks"
    - "deepfault fault localization for deep neural networks"
    - "machine learning testing survey landscapes and horizons"
    - "formal security analysis of neural networks using symbolic intervals"
    - "symbolic execution for deep neural networks"
    - "deepgauge multi granularity testing criteria for deep learning systems"
    - "deepmutation mutation testing of deep learning systems"
    - "concolic testing for deep neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "varmixup exploiting the latent space for robust training and inference"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial domain adaptation with domain mixup"
    - "mixup inference better exploiting mixup to defend adversarial attacks"
    - "theoretically principled trade off between robustness and accuracy"
    - "benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations"
    - "defense against adversarial attacks using feature scattering based adversarial training"
    - "harnessing the vulnerability of latent layers in adversarially trained models"
    - "mixmatch a holistic approach to semi supervised learning"
    - "on evaluating adversarial robustness"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)