human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "bandit online optimization over the permutahedron"
  Abstract: The permutahedron is the convex polytope with vertex set consisting of the vectors $(\pi(1),\dots, \pi(n))$ for all permutations (bijections) $\pi$ over $\{1,\dots, n\}$. We study a bandit game in which, at each step $t$, an adversary chooses a hidden weight weight vector $s_t$, a player chooses a vertex $\pi_t$ of the permutahedron and suffers an observed loss of $\sum_{i=1}^n \pi(i) s_t(i)$. #R##N#A previous algorithm CombBand of Cesa-Bianchi et al (2009) guarantees a regret of $O(n\sqrt{T \log n})$ for a time horizon of $T$. Unfortunately, CombBand requires at each step an $n$-by-$n$ matrix permanent approximation to within improved accuracy as $T$ grows, resulting in a total running time that is super linear in $T$, making it impractical for large time horizons. #R##N#We provide an algorithm of regret $O(n^{3/2}\sqrt{T})$ with total time complexity $O(n^3T)$. The ideas are a combination of CombBand and a recent algorithm by Ailon (2013) for online optimization over the permutahedron in the full information setting. The technical core is a bound on the variance of the Plackett-Luce noisy sorting process's "pseudo loss". The bound is obtained by establishing positive semi-definiteness of a family of 3-by-3 matrices generated from rational functions of exponentials of 3 parameters.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "combinatorial bandits revisited"):
  with members:
    - "first order regret bounds for combinatorial semi bandits"
    - "tight regret bounds for stochastic combinatorial semi bandits"
    - "unimodal bandits regret lower bounds and optimal algorithms"
    - "lipschitz bandits regret lower bounds and optimal algorithms"
    - "matroid bandits fast combinatorial optimization with learning"
    - "efficient learning in large scale combinatorial semi bandits"
    - "towards minimax policies for online linear optimization with bandit feedback"
    - "regret in online combinatorial optimization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "lower bounds for multi armed bandit with non equivalent multiple plays"):
  with members:
    - "iterative expectation for multi period information retrieval"
    - "a contextual bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)