human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "fixed points of social choice an axiomatic approach to network communities"
  Abstract: We provide the first social choice theory approach to the question of what constitutes a community in a social network. Inspired by the classic preferences models in social choice theory, we start from an abstract social network framework, called preference networks; these consist of a finite set of members where each member has a total-ranking preference of all members in the set. #R##N#Within this framework, we develop two complementary approaches to axiomatically study the formation and structures of communities. (1) We apply social choice theory and define communities indirectly by postulating that they are fixed points of a preference aggregation function obeying certain desirable axioms. (2) We directly postulate desirable axioms for communities without reference to preference aggregation, leading to eight natural community axioms. #R##N#These approaches allow us to formulate and analyze community rules. We prove a taxonomy theorem that provides a structural characterization of the family of community rules that satisfies all eight axioms. The structure is actually quite beautiful: these community rules form a bounded lattice under the natural intersection and union operations. Our structural theorem is complemented with a complexity result: while identifying a community by the most selective rule of the lattice is in P, deciding if a subset is a community by the most comprehensive rule of the lattice is coNP-complete. Our studies also shed light on the limitations of defining community rules solely based on preference aggregation: any aggregation function satisfying Arrow's IIA axiom, or based on commonly used aggregation schemes like the Borda count or generalizations thereof, lead to communities which violate at least one of our community axioms. Finally, we give a polynomial-time rule consistent with seven axioms and weakly satisfying the eighth axiom.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "communities in preference networks refined axioms and beyond"):
  with members:
    - "a uniqueness theorem for clustering"
    - "finding endogenously formed communities"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "community detection a refined axiomization and beyond"):
  with members:
    - "a uniqueness theorem for clustering"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)