human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "maximum metric spanning tree made byzantine tolerant"
  Abstract: Self-stabilization is a versatile approach to fault-tolerance since it permits a distributed system to recover from any transient fault that arbitrarily corrupts the contents of all memories in the system. Byzantine tolerance is an attractive feature of distributed systems that permits to cope with arbitrary malicious behaviors. This paper focus on systems that are both self-stabilizing and Byzantine tolerant. We consider the well known problem of constructing a maximum metric tree in this context. Combining these two properties is known to induce many impossibility results. In this paper, we provide first two impossibility results about the construction of maximum metric tree in presence of transients and (permanent) Byzantine faults. Then, we provide a new self-stabilizing protocol that provides optimal containment of an arbitrary number of Byzantine faults.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "self stabilizing mobile byzantine tolerant regular register with bounded timestamp"):
  with members:
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "on byzantine containment properties of the min 1 protocol"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reliable communication in a dynamic network in the presence of byzantine faults"):
  with members:
    - "a scalable byzantine grid"
    - "iterative approximate byzantine consensus under a generalized fault model"
    - "iterative approximate byzantine consensus in arbitrary directed graphs"
    - "on byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"
    - "time varying graphs and dynamic networks"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "on byzantine containment properties of the min 1 protocol"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on byzantine broadcast in planar graphs"):
  with members:
    - "a scalable byzantine grid"
    - "on byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "on byzantine containment properties of the min 1 protocol"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "parameterizable byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"):
  with members:
    - "a scalable byzantine grid"
    - "on byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "on byzantine containment properties of the min 1 protocol"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a scalable byzantine grid"):
  with members:
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "on byzantine containment properties of the min 1 protocol"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "on byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"):
  with members:
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "on byzantine containment properties of the min 1 protocol"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "self stabilizing byzantine resilient topology discovery and message delivery"):
  with members:
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)