human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a formal analysis of required cooperation in multi agent planning"
  Abstract: Research on multi-agent planning has been popular in recent years. While previous research has been motivated by the understanding that, through cooperation, multi-agent systems can achieve tasks that are unachievable by single-agent systems, there are no formal characterizations of situations where cooperation is required to achieve a goal, thus warranting the application of multi-agent systems. In this paper, we provide such a formal discussion from the planning aspect. We first show that determining whether there is required cooperation (RC) is intractable is general. Then, by dividing the problems that require cooperation (referred to as RC problems) into two classes -- problems with heterogeneous and homogeneous agents, we aim to identify all the conditions that can cause RC in these two classes. We establish that when none of these identified conditions hold, the problem is single-agent solvable. Furthermore, with a few assumptions, we provide an upper bound on the minimum number of agents required for RC problems with homogeneous agents. This study not only provides new insights into multi-agent planning, but also has many applications. For example, in human-robot teaming, when a robot cannot achieve a task, it may be due to RC. In such cases, the human teammate should be informed and, consequently, coordinate with other available robots for a solution.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "cooperative multi agent planning a survey"):
  with members:
    - "fmap distributed cooperative multi agent planning"
    - "an approach to multi agent planning with incomplete information"
    - "a flexible coupling approach to multi agent planning under incomplete information"
    - "game theoretic approach for non cooperative planning"
    - "the lama planner guiding cost based anytime planning with landmarks"
    - "the fast downward planning system"
    - "ordered landmarks in planning"
    - "pddl2 1 an extension to pddl for expressing temporal planning domains"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)