human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "explicit capacity achieving codes for worst case additive errors"
  Abstract: For every p in (0,1/2), we give an explicit construction of binary codes of rate approaching "capacity" 1-H(p) that enable reliable communication in the presence of worst-case additive errors}, caused by a channel oblivious to the codeword (but not necessarily the message). Formally, we give an efficient "stochastic" encoding E(\cdot,\cdot) of messages combined with a small number of auxiliary random bits, such that for every message m and every error vector e (that could depend on m) that contains at most a fraction p of ones, w.h.p over the random bits r chosen by the encoder, m can be efficiently recovered from the corrupted codeword E(m,r) + e by a decoder without knowledge of the encoder's randomness r. #R##N#Our construction for additive errors also yields explicit deterministic codes of rate approaching 1-H(p) for the "average error" criterion: for every error vector e of at most p fraction 1's, most messages m can be efficiently (uniquely) decoded from the corrupted codeword C(m)+e. Note that such codes cannot be linear, as the bad error patterns for all messages are the same in a linear code. We also give a new proof of the existence of such codes based on list decoding and certain algebraic manipulation detection codes. Our proof is simpler than the previous proofs from the literature on arbitrarily varying channels.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "upper bounds on the capacity of binary channels with causal adversaries"):
  with members:
    - "beating the gilbert varshamov bound for online channels"
    - "binary causal adversary channels"
    - "codes against online adversaries"
    - "rateless codes for avc models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "strong secrecy and reliable byzantine detection in the presence of an untrusted relay"):
  with members:
    - "a secure communication game with a relay helping the eavesdropper"
    - "the gaussian many to one interference channel with confidential messages"
    - "cooperation with an untrusted relay a secrecy perspective"
    - "the secrecy capacity region of the gaussian mimo multi receiver wiretap channel"
    - "the role of feedback in two way secure communications"
    - "providing secrecy with lattice codes"
    - "an algebraic watchdog for wireless network coding"
    - "two hop secure communication using an untrusted relay"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)