human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology a study of software technical review meetings"
  Abstract: By contrast to design meetings, design evaluation meetings (DEMs) have generally been considered as situations in which, according to DEMs methodologies, design activities are quite marginal. In a study of DEMs in software development, i.e. in technical review meetings following a particular review methodology, we showed: (i) the occurrence of design activities as part of an argumentation process; (ii) the relative importance of cognitive synchronisation as a prerequisite for evaluation; (iii) the important role played in evaluation by argumentation that makes explicit the underlying design rationale (DR). On the basis of our results, we discuss the potential for using DR methodologies in this kind of meetings.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "design one but in different forms"):
  with members:
    - "designing as construction of representations a dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research"
    - "reuse of designs desperately seeking an interdisciplinary cognitive approach"
    - "mental representations constructed by experts and novices in object oriented program comprehension"
    - "evocation and elaboration of solutions different types of problem solving actions an empirical study on the design of an aerospace artifact"
    - "analysing viewpoints in design through the argumentation process"
    - "both generic design and different forms of designing"
    - "dynamic aspects of individual design activities a cognitive ergonomics viewpoint"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "designing as construction of representations a dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research"):
  with members:
    - "negotiation in collaborative assessment of design solutions an empirical study on a concurrent engineering process"
    - "an empirical study of software reuse by experts in object oriented design"
    - "reuse of designs desperately seeking an interdisciplinary cognitive approach"
    - "cognitive effort in collective software design methodological perspectives in cognitive ergonomics"
    - "evocation and elaboration of solutions different types of problem solving actions an empirical study on the design of an aerospace artifact"
    - "analysing viewpoints in design through the argumentation process"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a methodological framework for socio cognitive analyses of collaborative design of open source software"):
  with members:
    - "cognitive effort in collective software design methodological perspectives in cognitive ergonomics"
    - "viewpoints in co design a field study in concurrent engineering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "collaborative design managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives"):
  with members:
    - "a methodological framework for socio cognitive analyses of collaborative design of open source software"
    - "negotiation in collaborative assessment of design solutions an empirical study on a concurrent engineering process"
    - "quantitative measurements of the influence of participant roles during peer review meetings"
    - "analysing viewpoints in design through the argumentation process"
    - "viewpoints in co design a field study in concurrent engineering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "multimodality and parallelism in design interaction co designers alignment and coalitions"):
  with members:
    - "conception individuelle et collective approche de l ergonomie cognitive individual and collective design the cognitive ergonomics approach"
    - "designing as construction of representations a dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research"
    - "quantitative measurements of the influence of participant roles during peer review meetings"
    - "viewpoints in co design a field study in concurrent engineering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "users participation to the design process in an open source software online community"):
  with members:
    - "a methodological framework for socio cognitive analyses of collaborative design of open source software"
    - "viewpoints in co design a field study in concurrent engineering"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction)