human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "bias and agreement in syntactic annotations"
  Abstract: We present a study on two key characteristics of human syntactic annotations: anchoring and agreement. Anchoring is a well known cognitive bias in human decision making, where judgments are drawn towards pre-existing values. We study the influence of anchoring on a standard approach to creation of syntactic resources where syntactic annotations are obtained via human editing of tagger and parser output. Our experiments demonstrate a clear anchoring effect and reveal unwanted consequences, including overestimation of parsing performance and lower quality of annotations in comparison with human-based annotations. Using sentences from the Penn Treebank WSJ, we also report the first systematically obtained inter-annotator agreement estimates for English syntactic parsing. Our agreement results control for anchoring bias, and are consequential in that they are \emph{on par} with state of the art parsing performance for English. We discuss the impact of our findings on strategies for future annotation efforts and parser evaluations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "formal models of structure building in music language and animal songs"):
  with members:
    - "gated feedback recurrent neural networks"
    - "visualizing and understanding recurrent networks"
    - "adam a method for stochastic optimization"
    - "distributed representations of sentences and documents"
    - "neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate"
    - "adadelta an adaptive learning rate method"
    - "tnt a statistical part of speech tagger"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "constance modeling annotation contexts to improve stance classification"):
  with members:
    - "who said what modeling individual labelers improves classification"
    - "demographic dialectal variation in social media a case study of african american english"
    - "stance and sentiment in tweets"
    - "a framework for under specifying dependency syntax without overloading annotators"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)