human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "connectivity preserving iterative compaction and finding 2 disjoint rooted paths in linear time"
  Abstract: In this paper we show how to combine two algorithmic techniques to obtain linear time algorithms for various optimization problems on graphs, and present a subroutine which will be useful in doing so. #R##N#The first technique is iterative shrinking. In the first phase of an iterative shrinking algorithm, we construct a sequence of graphs of decreasing size $G_1,\ldots,G_\ell$ where $G_1$ is the initial input, $G_\ell$ is a graph on which the problem is easy, and $G_i$ is obtained from $G_{i+1}$ via some shrinking algorithm. In the second phase we work through the sequence in reverse, repeatedly constructing a solution for a graph from the solution for its successor. In an iterative compaction algorithm, we insist that the graphs decrease by a constant fraction of the entire graph. #R##N#Another approach to solving optimization problems is to exploit the structural properties implied by the connectivity of the input graph. This approach can be used on graphs which are not highly connected by decomposing an input graph into its highly connected pieces, solving subproblems on these specially structured pieces and then combining their solutions. #R##N#We combine these two techniques by developing compaction algorithms which when applied to the highly connected pieces preserve their connectivity properties. The structural properties this connectivity implies can be helpful both in finding further compactions in later iterations and when we are manipulating solutions in the second phase of an iterative compaction algorithm. #R##N#To illustrate how this compaction algorithm can be used as a subroutine, we present a linear time algorithm that given four vertices $\{s_1,s_2,t_1,t_2\}$ of a graph $G$, either finds a pair of disjoint paths $P_1$ and $P_2$ of $G$ such that $P_i$ has endpoints $s_i$ and $t_i$, or returns a planar embedding of an auxiliary graph which shows that no such pair exists.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "finding maximal sets of laminar 3 separators in planar graphs in linear time"):
  with members:
    - "nc algorithms for perfect matching and maximum flow in one crossing minor free graphs"
    - "flows in one crossing minor free graphs"
    - "subgraph isomorphism in planar graphs and related problems"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)