human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "eminret heuristic for energy aware vm placement with fixed intervals and non preemption"
  Abstract: Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) clouds have become more popular enabling users to run applications under virtual machines. This paper investigates the energy-aware virtual machine (VM) allocation problems in IaaS clouds along characteristics: multiple resources, and fixed interval times and non-preemption of virtual machines. Many previous works proposed to use a minimum number of physical machines, however, this is not necessarily a good solution to minimize total energy consumption in the VM placement with multiple resources, fixed interval times and non-preemption. We observed that minimizing total energy consumption of physical machines is equivalent to minimize the sum of total completion time of all physical machines. Based on the observation, we propose EMinRET algorithm. The EMinRET algorithm swaps an allocating VM with a suitable overlapped VM, which is of the same VM type and is allocated on the same physical machine, to minimize total completion time of all physical machines. The EMinRET uses resource utilization during executing time period of a physical machine as the evaluation metric, and will then choose a host that minimizes the metric to allocate a new VM. In addition, this work studies some heuristics for sorting the list of virtual machines (e.g., sorting by the earliest starting time, or the longest duration time first, etc.) to allocate VM. Using the realistic log-trace in the Parallel Workloads Archive, our simulation results show that the EMinRET algorithm could reduce from 25% to 45% energy consumption compared with power-aware best-fit decreasing (PABFD)) and vector bin-packing norm-based greedy algorithms. Moreover, the EMinRET heuristic has also less total energy consumption than our previous heuristics (e.g. MinDFT and EPOBF) in the simulations (using same virtual machines sorting method).

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "minimizing total busy time with application to energy efficient scheduling of virtual machines in iaas clouds"):
  with members:
    - "epobf energy efficient allocation of virtual machines in high performance computing cloud"
    - "a taxonomy and survey of energy efficient data centers and cloud computing systems"
    - "energy efficient scheduling of hpc applications in cloud computing environments"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)