human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "sublinear algorithms for approximating string compressibility"
  Abstract: We raise the question of approximating the compressibility of a string with respect to a fixed compression scheme, in sublinear time. We study this question in detail for two popular lossless compression schemes: run-length encoding (RLE) and Lempel-Ziv (LZ), and present sublinear algorithms for approximating compressibility with respect to both schemes. We also give several lower bounds that show that our algorithms for both schemes cannot be improved significantly. #R##N#Our investigation of LZ yields results whose interest goes beyond the initial questions we set out to study. In particular, we prove combinatorial structural lemmas that relate the compressibility of a string with respect to Lempel-Ziv to the number of distinct short substrings contained in it. In addition, we show that approximating the compressibility with respect to LZ is related to approximating the support size of a distribution.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards a definitive measure of repetitiveness"):
  with members:
    - "resolution of the burrows wheeler transform conjecture"
    - "optimal rank and select queries on dictionary compressed text"
    - "optimal time dictionary compressed indexes"
    - "fully functional suffix trees and optimal text searching in bwt runs bounded space"
    - "on the approximation ratio of greedy parsings"
    - "universal compressed text indexing"
    - "representing the suffix tree with the cdawg"
    - "time space trade offs for lempel ziv compressed indexing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "optimal time dictionary compressed indexes"):
  with members:
    - "optimal rank and select queries on dictionary compressed text"
    - "fast prefix search in little space with applications"
    - "universal compressed text indexing"
    - "representing the suffix tree with the cdawg"
    - "time space trade offs for lempel ziv compressed indexing"
    - "at the roots of dictionary compression string attractors"
    - "compressed indexing with signature grammars"
    - "document listing on repetitive collections with guaranteed performance"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)