human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "semi streaming algorithms for annotated graph streams"
  Abstract: Considerable effort has been devoted to the development of streaming algorithms for analyzing massive graphs. Unfortunately, many results have been negative, establishing that a wide variety of problems require $\Omega(n^2)$ space to solve. One of the few bright spots has been the development of semi-streaming algorithms for a handful of graph problems -- these algorithms use space $O(n\cdot\text{polylog}(n))$. #R##N#In the annotated data streaming model of Chakrabarti et al., a computationally limited client wants to compute some property of a massive input, but lacks the resources to store even a small fraction of the input, and hence cannot perform the desired computation locally. The client therefore accesses a powerful but untrusted service provider, who not only performs the requested computation, but also proves that the answer is correct. #R##N#We put forth the notion of semi-streaming algorithms for annotated graph streams (semi-streaming annotation schemes for short). These are protocols in which both the client's space usage and the length of the proof are $O(n \cdot \text{polylog}(n))$. We give evidence that semi-streaming annotation schemes represent a substantially more robust solution concept than does the standard semi-streaming model. On the positive side, we give semi-streaming annotation schemes for two dynamic graph problems that are intractable in the standard model: (exactly) counting triangles, and (exactly) computing maximum matchings. The former scheme answers a question of Cormode. On the negative side, we identify for the first time two natural graph problems (connectivity and bipartiteness in a certain edge update model) that can be solved in the standard semi-streaming model, but cannot be solved by annotation schemes of "sub-semi-streaming" cost. That is, these problems are just as hard in the annotations model as they are in the standard model.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "approximate mathbb f _2 sketching of valuation functions"):
  with members:
    - "optimality of linear sketching under modular updates"
    - "optimal lower bounds for universal relation and for samplers and finding duplicates in streams"
    - "testing submodularity and other properties of valuation functions"
    - "almost optimal streaming algorithms for coverage problems"
    - "tight bounds for single pass streaming complexity of the set cover problem"
    - "towards tight bounds for the streaming set cover problem"
    - "streaming algorithms for submodular function maximization"
    - "incidence geometries and the pass complexity of semi streaming set cover"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "optimality of linear sketching under modular updates"):
  with members:
    - "on estimating maximum matching size in graph streams"
    - "densest subgraph in dynamic graph streams"
    - "parity decision tree complexity and 4 party communication complexity of xor functions are polynomially equivalent"
    - "maximum matching in turnstile streams"
    - "on the communication complexity of xor functions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "streaming verification of graph properties"):
  with members:
    - "bipartite perfect matching is in quasi nc"
    - "rational proofs with multiple provers"
    - "tight bounds for linear sketches of approximate matchings"
    - "sublinear estimation of weighted matchings in dynamic data streams"
    - "maximum matching in turnstile streams"
    - "sketching cuts in graphs and hypergraphs"
    - "an improved interactive streaming algorithm for the distinct elements problem"
    - "streaming lower bounds for approximating max cut"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)