human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "obst a self adjusting peer to peer overlay based on multiple bsts"
  Abstract: The design of scalable and robust overlay topologies has been a main research subject since the very origins of peer-to-peer (p2p) computing. Today, the corresponding optimization tradeoffs are fairly well-understood, at least in the static case and from a worst-case perspective. #R##N#This paper revisits the peer-to-peer topology design problem from a self-organization perspective. We initiate the study of topologies which are optimized to serve the communication demand, or even self-adjusting as demand changes. The appeal of this new paradigm lies in the opportunity to be able to go beyond the lower bounds and limitations imposed by a static, communication-oblivious, topology. For example, the goal of having short routing paths (in terms of hop count) does no longer conflict with the requirement of having low peer degrees. #R##N#We propose a simple overlay topology Obst(k) which is composed of k (rooted and directed) Binary Search Trees (BSTs), where k is a parameter. We first prove some fundamental bounds on what can and cannot be achieved optimizing a topology towards a static communication pattern (a static Obst(k)). In particular, we show that the number of BSTs that constitute the overlay can have a large impact on the routing costs, and that a single additional BST may reduce the amortized communication costs from Omega(log(n)) to O(1), where n is the number of peers. Subsequently, we discuss a natural self-adjusting extension of Obst(k), in which frequently communicating partners are "splayed together".

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "demand aware network designs of bounded degree"):
  with members:
    - "toward demand aware networking a theory for self adjusting networks"
    - "locally self adjusting skip graphs"
    - "high throughput data center topology design"
    - "fast construction of nets in low dimensional metrics and their applications"
    - "nearly linear time algorithms for graph partitioning graph sparsification and solving linear systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "locally self adjusting skip graphs"):
  with members:
    - "self adjusting networks to minimize expected path length"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)