human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the theory is predictive but is it complete an application to human perception of randomness"
  Abstract: When we test a theory using data, it is common to focus on correctness: do the predictions of the theory match what we see in the data? But we also care about completeness: how much of the predictable variation in the data is captured by the theory? This question is difficult to answer, because in general we do not know how much "predictable variation" there is in the problem. In this paper, we consider approaches motivated by machine learning algorithms as a means of constructing a benchmark for the best attainable level of prediction. #R##N#We illustrate our methods on the task of predicting human-generated random sequences. Relative to an atheoretical machine learning algorithm benchmark, we find that existing behavioral models explain roughly 15 percent of the predictable variation in this problem. This fraction is robust across several variations on the problem. We also consider a version of this approach for analyzing field data from domains in which human perception and generation of randomness has been used as a conceptual framework; these include sequential decision-making and repeated zero-sum games. In these domains, our framework for testing the completeness of theories provides a way of assessing their effectiveness over different contexts; we find that despite some differences, the existing theories are fairly stable across our field domains in their performance relative to the benchmark. Overall, our results indicate that (i) there is a significant amount of structure in this problem that existing models have yet to capture and (ii) there are rich domains in which machine learning may provide a viable approach to testing completeness.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "other play for zero shot coordination"):
  with members:
    - "adversarially guided self play for adopting social conventions"
    - "plannable approximations to mdp homomorphisms equivariance under actions"
    - "the hanabi challenge a new frontier for ai research"
    - "improving policies via search in cooperative partially observable games"
    - "on the utility of learning about humans for human ai coordination"
    - "to populate is to regulate"
    - "simplified action decoder for deep multi agent reinforcement learning"
    - "a survey and critique of multiagent deep reinforcement learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "scaling up psychology via scientific regret minimization a case study in moral decision making"):
  with members:
    - "using machine learning to guide cognitive modeling a case study in moral reasoning"
    - "flipout efficient pseudo independent weight perturbations on mini batches"
    - "gpipe efficient training of giant neural networks using pipeline parallelism"
    - "a computational model of commonsense moral decision making"
    - "on calibration of modern neural networks"
    - "evaluating and improving the correspondence between deep neural networks and human representations"
    - "how deep is knowledge tracing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "cognitive model priors for predicting human decisions"):
  with members:
    - "predicting human decisions with behavioral theories and machine learning"
    - "scalable training of artificial neural networks with adaptive sparse connectivity inspired by network science"
    - "do cifar 10 classifiers generalize to cifar 10"
    - "behavior based machine learning a hybrid approach for predicting human decision making"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)