human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "optimal radio frequency energy harvesting with limited energy arrival knowledge"
  Abstract: In this paper, we develop optimal policies for deciding when a wireless node with radio frequency (RF) energy harvesting (EH) capabilities should try and harvest ambient RF energy. While the idea of RF-EH is appealing, it is not always beneficial to attempt to harvest energy; in environments where the ambient energy is low, nodes could consume more energy being awake with their harvesting circuits turned on than what they can extract from the ambient radio signals; it is then better to enter a sleep mode until the ambient RF energy increases. Towards this end, we consider a scenario with intermittent energy arrivals and a wireless node that wakes up for a period of time (herein called the time-slot) and harvests energy. If enough energy is harvested during the time-slot, then the harvesting is successful and excess energy is stored; however, if there does not exist enough energy the harvesting is unsuccessful and energy is lost. #R##N#We assume that the ambient energy level is constant during the time-slot, and changes at slot boundaries. The energy level dynamics are described by a two-state Gilbert-Elliott Markov chain model, where the state of the Markov chain can only be observed during the harvesting action, and not when in sleep mode. Two scenarios are studied under this model. In the first scenario, we assume that we have knowledge of the transition probabilities of the Markov chain and formulate the problem as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP), where we find a threshold-based optimal policy. In the second scenario, we assume that we don't have any knowledge about these parameters and formulate the problem as a Bayesian adaptive POMDP; to reduce the complexity of the computations we also propose a heuristic posterior sampling algorithm. The performance of our approaches is demonstrated via numerical examples.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)