human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "quantifying equivocation for finite blocklength wiretap codes"
  Abstract: This paper presents a new technique for providing the analysis and comparison of wiretap codes in the small blocklength regime over the binary erasure wiretap channel. A major result is the development of Monte Carlo strategies for quantifying a code's equivocation, which mirrors techniques used to analyze normal error correcting codes. For this paper, we limit our analysis to coset-based wiretap codes, and make several comparisons of different code families at small and medium blocklengths. Our results indicate that there are security advantages to using specific codes when using small to medium blocklengths.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "physical layer security does it work in a real environment"):
  with members:
    - "analysis of short blocklength codes for secrecy"
    - "semantically secure lattice codes for the gaussian wiretap channel"
    - "principles of physical layer security in multiuser wireless networks a survey"
    - "coding with scrambling concatenation and harq for the awgn wire tap channel a security gap analysis"
    - "coding for cryptographic security enhancement using stopping sets"
    - "physical layer security combining error control coding and cryptography"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "analysis of short blocklength codes for secrecy"):
  with members:
    - "performance assessment and design of finite length ldpc codes for the gaussian wiretap channel"
    - "semantically secure lattice codes for the gaussian wiretap channel"
    - "principles of physical layer security in multiuser wireless networks a survey"
    - "deterministic constructions for large girth protograph ldpc codes"
    - "coding with scrambling concatenation and harq for the awgn wire tap channel a security gap analysis"
    - "ldpc code design for the bpsk constrained gaussian wiretap channel"
    - "achieving the secrecy capacity of wiretap channels using polar codes"
    - "coding for cryptographic security enhancement using stopping sets"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)