human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "optimatch semantic web system with knowledge base for query performance problem determination"
  Abstract: Database query performance problem determination is often performed by analyzing query execution plans (QEPs) in addition to other performance data. As the query workloads that organizations run, have become larger and more complex, analyzing QEPs manually even by experts has become a very time consuming. Most performance diagnostic tools help with identifying problematic queries and most query tuning tools address a limited number of known problems and recommendations. We present the OptImatch system that offers a way to (a) look for varied user defined problem patterns in QEPs and (b) automatically get recommendations from an expert provided and user customizable knowledge base. Existing approaches do not provide the ability to perform workload analysis with flexible user defined patterns, as they lack the ability to impose a proper structure on QEPs. We introduce a novel semantic web system that allows a relatively naive user to search for arbitrary patterns and to get recommendations stored in a knowledge base either by experts or added by the user tailored to the environment in which they operate. Our methodology includes transforming a QEP into an RDF graph and transforming a GUI based user-defined pattern into a SPARQL query through handlers. The SPARQL query is matched against the abstracted RDF graph, and any matched portion of the abstracted RDF graph is relayed back to the user. With the knowledge base, the OptImatch system automatically scans and matches interesting stored patterns in a statistical way as appropriate and returns the corresponding recommendations. Although the knowledge base patterns and solution recommendations are not in the context of the user supplied QEPs, the context is adapted automatically through the handler tagging interface.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)