human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a complexity analysis of policy iteration through combinatorial matrices arising from unique sink orientations"
  Abstract: Unique Sink Orientations (USOs) are an appealing abstraction of several major optimization problems of applied mathematics such as for instance Linear Programming (LP), Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) or 2-player Turn Based Stochastic Games (2TBSGs). A polynomial time algorithm to find the sink of a USO would translate into a strongly polynomial time algorithm to solve the aforementioned problems---a major quest for all three cases. In addition, we may translate MDPs and 2TBSGs into the problem of finding the sink of an acyclic USO of a cube, which can be done using the well-known Policy Iteration algorithm (PI). The study of its complexity is the object of this work. Despite its exponential worst case complexity, the principle of PI is a powerful source of inspiration for other methods. #R##N#As our first contribution, we disprove Hansen and Zwick's conjecture claiming that the number of steps of PI should follow the Fibonacci sequence in the worst case. Our analysis relies on a new combinatorial formulation of the problem---the so-called Order-Regularity formulation (OR). Then, for our second contribution, we (exponentially) improve the $\Omega(1.4142^n)$ lower bound on the number of steps of PI from Schurr and Szab\'o in the case of the OR formulation and obtain an $\Omega(1.4269^n)$ bound.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "improved bound on the worst case complexity of policy iteration"):
  with members:
    - "pagerank optimization by edge selection"
    - "the value iteration algorithm is not strongly polynomial for discounted dynamic programming"
    - "on the complexity of policy iteration"
    - "the simplex method is strongly polynomial for deterministic markov decision processes"
    - "strategy iteration is strongly polynomial for 2 player turn based stochastic games with a constant discount factor"
    - "exponential lower bounds for policy iteration"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)