human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "delay optimal scheduling for queueing systems with switching overhead"
  Abstract: We study the scheduling polices for asymptotically optimal delay in queueing systems with switching overhead. Such systems consist of a single server that serves multiple queues, and some capacity is lost whenever the server switches to serve a different set of queues. The capacity loss due to this switching overhead can be significant in many emerging applications, and needs to be explicitly addressed in the design of scheduling policies. For example, in 60GHz wireless networks with directional antennas, base stations need to train and reconfigure their beam patterns whenever they switch from one client to another. Considerable switching overhead can also be observed in many other queueing systems such as transportation networks and manufacturing systems. While the celebrated Max-Weight policy achieves asymptotically optimal average delay for systems without switching overhead, it fails to preserve throughput-optimality, let alone delay-optimality, when switching overhead is taken into account. We propose a class of Biased Max-Weight scheduling policies that explicitly takes switching overhead into account. The Biased Max-Weight policy can use either queue length or head-of-line waiting time as an indicator of the system status. We prove that our policies not only are throughput-optimal, but also can be made arbitrarily close to the asymptotic lower bound on average delay. To validate the performance of the proposed policies, we provide extensive simulation with various system topologies and different traffic patterns. We show that the proposed policies indeed achieve much better delay performance than that of the state-of-the-art policy.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "age delay tradeoffs in queueing systems"):
  with members:
    - "a general formula for the stationary distribution of the age of information and its application to single server queues"
    - "age of information for discrete time queues"
    - "delay optimal and energy efficient communications with markovian arrivals"
    - "age delay tradeoffs in single server systems"
    - "age of information in a network of preemptive servers"
    - "the age of information in networks moments distributions and sampling"
    - "age of information in g g 1 1 systems"
    - "can determinacy minimize age of information"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.PF(Performance)