human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on the im possibility of fairness"
  Abstract: What does it mean for an algorithm to be fair? Different papers use different notions of algorithmic fairness, and although these appear internally consistent, they also seem mutually incompatible. We present a mathematical setting in which the distinctions in previous papers can be made formal. In addition to characterizing the spaces of inputs (the "observed" space) and outputs (the "decision" space), we introduce the notion of a construct space: a space that captures unobservable, but meaningful variables for the prediction. #R##N#We show that in order to prove desirable properties of the entire decision-making process, different mechanisms for fairness require different assumptions about the nature of the mapping from construct space to decision space. The results in this paper imply that future treatments of algorithmic fairness should more explicitly state assumptions about the relationship between constructs and observations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness"):
  with members:
    - "on measuring social biases in sentence encoders"
    - "fairface face attribute dataset for balanced race gender and age"
    - "fair regression quantitative definitions and reduction based algorithms"
    - "putting fairness principles into practice challenges metrics and improvements"
    - "generative adversarial networks for mitigating biases in machine learning systems"
    - "improved adversarial learning for fair classification"
    - "compositional fairness constraints for graph embeddings"
    - "mathematical notions vs human perception of fairness a descriptive approach to fairness for machine learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "demographic bias in biometrics a survey on an emerging challenge"):
  with members:
    - "post comparison mitigation of demographic bias in face recognition using fair score normalization"
    - "50 years of test un fairness lessons for machine learning"
    - "diversity in faces"
    - "fairface face attribute dataset for balanced race gender and age"
    - "an experimental evaluation of covariates effects on unconstrained face verification"
    - "sensitivenets learning agnostic representations with application to face recognition"
    - "some research problems in biometrics the future beckons"
    - "mitigate bias in face recognition using skewness aware reinforcement learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fairsight visual analytics for fairness in decision making"):
  with members:
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "manifold a model agnostic framework for interpretation and diagnosis of machine learning models"
    - "a nutritional label for rankings"
    - "using image fairness representations in diversity based re ranking for recommendations"
    - "rulematrix visualizing and understanding classifiers with rules"
    - "equity of attention amortizing individual fairness in rankings"
    - "fairness of exposure in rankings"
    - "fa ir a fair top k ranking algorithm"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "whose tweets are surveilled for the police an audit of social media monitoring tool via log files"):
  with members:
    - "runaway feedback loops in predictive policing"
    - "greysanatomy vs yankees demographics and hashtag use on twitter"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "predictive biases in natural language processing models a conceptual framework and overview"):
  with members:
    - "what s in a name reducing bias in bios without access to protected attributes"
    - "evaluating gender bias in machine translation"
    - "model cards for model reporting"
    - "black is to criminal as caucasian is to police detecting and removing multiclass bias in word embeddings"
    - "a framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning"
    - "measuring bias in contextualized word representations"
    - "lipstick on a pig debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them"
    - "counterfactual data augmentation for mitigating gender stereotypes in languages with rich morphology"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "fair algorithms for clustering"):
  with members:
    - "tight fpt approximations for k median and k means"
    - "scalable fair clustering"
    - "on the cost of essentially fair clusterings"
    - "privacy preserving clustering with constraints"
    - "constant factor fpt approximation for capacitated k median"
    - "a unified framework for clustering constrained data without locality property"
    - "fair clustering through fairlets"
    - "generalized center problems with outliers"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "measurement and fairness"):
  with members:
    - "50 years of test un fairness lessons for machine learning"
    - "the scientific method in the science of machine learning"
    - "the profiling potential of computer vision and the challenge of computational empiricism"
    - "racial categories in machine learning"
    - "problem formulation and fairness"
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "simplicity creates inequity implications for fairness stereotypes and interpretability"
    - "the measure and mismeasure of fairness a critical review of fair machine learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "fairness aware ranking in search recommendation systems with application to linkedin talent search"):
  with members:
    - "talent search and recommendation systems at linkedin practical challenges and lessons learned"
    - "equity of attention amortizing individual fairness in rankings"
    - "fairness of exposure in rankings"
    - "ranking with fairness constraints"
    - "multiwinner voting with fairness constraints"
    - "learning non discriminatory predictors"
    - "algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness"
    - "fa ir a fair top k ranking algorithm"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CY(Computers and Society)