human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the stable fixtures problem with payments"
  Abstract: We generalize two well-known game-theoretic models by introducing multiple partners matching games, defined by a graph $G=(N,E)$, with an integer vertex capacity function $b$ and an edge weighting $w$. The set $N$ consists of a number of players that are to form a set $M\subseteq E$ of 2-player coalitions $ij$ with value $w(ij)$, such that each player $i$ is in at most $b(i)$ coalitions. A payoff vector is a mapping $p: N \times N \rightarrow {\mathbb R}$ with $p(i,j)+p(j,i)=w(ij)$ if $ij\in M$ and $p(i,j)=p(j,i)=0$ if $ij\notin M$. The pair $(M,p)$ is called a solution. A pair of players $i,j$ with $ij\in E\setminus M$ blocks a solution $(M,p)$ if $i,j$ can form, possibly only after withdrawing from one of their existing 2-player coalitions, a new 2-player coalition in which they are mutually better off. A solution is stable if it has no blocking pairs. #R##N#We give a polynomial-time algorithm that either finds that a given multiple partners matching game has no stable solution, or obtains a stable solution for it. We characterize the set of stable solutions of a multiple partners matching game in two different ways and show how this leads to simple proofs for a number of known results of Sotomayor (1992,1999,2007) for multiple partners ssignment games and to generalizations of some of these results to multiple partners matching games. We also perform a study on the core of the corresponding cooperative game, where coalitions of any size may be formed. In particular we show that the standard relation between the existence of a stable solution and the non-emptiness of the core, which holds in the other models with payments, is no longer valid for our (most general) model. We also prove that the problem of deciding if an allocation belongs to the core jumps from being polynomial-time solvable for $b\leq 2$ to NP-complete for $b\equiv 3$.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "computing the nucleolus of weighted cooperative matching games in polynomial time"):
  with members:
    - "the matching polytope has exponential extension complexity"
    - "the cooperative game theory foundations of network bargaining games"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "new and simple algorithms for stable flow problems"):
  with members:
    - "complexity of stability in trading networks"
    - "acyclic preference systems in p2p networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)