human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "scalable and compact 3d action recognition with approximated rbf kernel machines"
  Abstract: Despite the recent deep learning (DL) revolution, kernel machines still remain powerful methods for action recognition. DL has brought the use of large datasets and this is typically a problem for kernel approaches, which are not scaling up efficiently due to kernel Gram matrices. Nevertheless, kernel methods are still attractive and more generally applicable since they can equally manage different sizes of the datasets, also in cases where DL techniques show some limitations. This work investigates these issues by proposing an explicit approximated representation that, together with a linear model, is an equivalent, yet scalable, implementation of a kernel machine. Our approximation is directly inspired by the exact feature map that is induced by an RBF Gaussian kernel but, unlike the latter, it is finite dimensional and very compact. We justify the soundness of our idea with a theoretical analysis which proves the unbiasedness of the approximation, and provides a vanishing bound for its variance, which is shown to decrease much rapidly than in alternative methods in the literature. In a broad experimental validation, we assess the superiority of our approximation in terms of 1) ease and speed of training, 2) compactness of the model, and 3) improvements with respect to the state-of-the-art performance.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "learning unbiased representations via mutual information backpropagation"):
  with members:
    - "on variational bounds of mutual information"
    - "flexibly fair representation learning by disentanglement"
    - "turning a blind eye explicit removal of biases and variation from deep neural network embeddings"
    - "beyond local nash equilibria for adversarial networks"
    - "invariant representations without adversarial training"
    - "learning not to learn training deep neural networks with biased data"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "generalizing across domains via cross gradient training"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)