human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "using latent semantic analysis to identify quality in use qu indicators from user reviews"
  Abstract: The paper describes a novel approach to categorize users' reviews according to the three Quality in Use (QU) indicators defined in ISO: effectiveness, efficiency and freedom from risk. With the tremendous amount of reviews published each day, there is a need to automatically summarize user reviews to inform us if any of the software able to meet requirement of a company according to the quality requirements. We implemented the method of Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) and its subspace to predict QU indicators. We build a reduced dimensionality universal semantic space from Information System journals and Amazon reviews. Next, we projected set of indicators' measurement scales into the universal semantic space and represent them as subspace. In the subspace, we can map similar measurement scales to the unseen reviews and predict the QU indicators. Our preliminary study able to obtain the average of F-measure, 0.3627.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a comprehensive comparative study of word and sentence similarity measures"):
  with members:
    - "building a pilot software quality in use benchmark dataset"
    - "measuring software quality in use state of the art and research challenges"
    - "roget s thesaurus and semantic similarity"
    - "text relatedness based on a word thesaurus"
    - "the google similarity distance"
    - "mining the web for synonyms pmi ir versus lsa on toefl"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "building a pilot software quality in use benchmark dataset"):
  with members:
    - "measuring software quality in use state of the art and research challenges"
    - "towards resolving software quality in use measurement challenges"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)