human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "why sov might be initially preferred and then lost or recovered a theoretical framework"
  Abstract: Little is known about why SOV order is initially preferred and then discarded or recovered. Here we present a framework for understanding these and many related word order phenomena: the diversity of dominant orders, the existence of free words orders, the need of alternative word orders and word order reversions and cycles in evolution. Under that framework, word order is regarded as a multiconstraint satisfaction problem in which at least two constraints are in conflict: online memory minimization and maximum predictability.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "anti dependency distance minimization in short sequences a graph theoretic approach"):
  with members:
    - "the placement of the head that maximizes predictability an information theoretic approach"
    - "towards a theory of word order comment on dependency distance a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural language by haitao liu et al"
    - "scarcity of crossing dependencies a direct outcome of a specific constraint"
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "liberating language research from dogmas of the 20th century"
    - "a commentary on the now or never bottleneck a fundamental constraint on language by christiansen and chater 2016"
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "random crossings in dependency trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards a theory of word order comment on dependency distance a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural language by haitao liu et al"):
  with members:
    - "the placement of the head that maximizes predictability an information theoretic approach"
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "kauffman s adjacent possible in word order evolution"
    - "reply to the commentary be careful when assuming the obvious by p alday"
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "a stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependencies"
    - "the placement of the head that minimizes online memory a complex systems approach"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "scarcity of crossing dependencies a direct outcome of a specific constraint"):
  with members:
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "crossings as a side effect of dependency lengths"
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "a stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependencies"
    - "random crossings in dependency trees"
    - "hubiness length crossings and their relationships in dependency trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"):
  with members:
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "the placement of the head that minimizes online memory a complex systems approach"
    - "hubiness length crossings and their relationships in dependency trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a commentary on the now or never bottleneck a fundamental constraint on language by christiansen and chater 2015"):
  with members:
    - "compression and the origins of zipf s law for word frequencies"
    - "crossings as a side effect of dependency lengths"
    - "compression and the origins of zipf s law of abbreviation"
    - "reply to the commentary be careful when assuming the obvious by p alday"
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "a stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependencies"
    - "the optimality of attaching unlinked labels to unlinked meanings"
    - "the placement of the head that minimizes online memory a complex systems approach"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "reply to the commentary be careful when assuming the obvious by p alday"):
  with members:
    - "be careful when assuming the obvious commentary on the placement of the head that minimizes online memory a complex systems approach"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)