human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the relationship among research productivity research collaboration and their determinants"
  Abstract: This work provides an in-depth analysis of the relation between the different types of collaboration and research productivity, showing how both are influenced by some personal and organizational variables. By applying different cross-lagged panel models, we are able to analyze the relationship among research productivity, collaboration and their determinants. In particular, we show that only collaboration at intramural and domestic level has a positive effect on research productivity. Differently, all the forms of collaboration are positively affected by research productivity. The results can favor the reexamination of the theories related to these issues, and inform policies that would be more suited to their management.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "china may need to support more small teams in scientific research"):
  with members:
    - "practical method to reclassify web of science articles into unique subject categories and broad disciplines"
    - "the preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration"
    - "collaboration diversity and scientific impact"
    - "funding acknowledgment analysis queries and caveats"
    - "characterization description and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in web of science"
    - "understanding the group dynamics and success of teams"
    - "field normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output"):
  with members:
    - "diversification versus specialization in scientific research which strategy pays off"
    - "the effects of gender age and academic rank on research diversification"
    - "the effect of multidisciplinary collaborations on research diversification"
    - "do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science"
    - "specialization versus diversification in research activities the extent intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists"
    - "does your surname affect the citability of your publications"
    - "variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields"):
  with members:
    - "dimensions a competitor to scopus and the web of science"
    - "google scholar web of science and scopus a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories"
    - "international research collaboration novelty conventionality and atypicality in knowledge recombination"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration an analysis based on data from f1000prime and normalized citation scores"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"
    - "the relationship between the number of authors of a publication its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal evidence from italy"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the collaboration behavior of top scientists"):
  with members:
    - "measuring science irresistible temptations easy shortcuts and dangerous consequences"
    - "revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement"
    - "variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "individual research performance a proposal for comparing apples to oranges"
    - "the collaboration behaviors of scientists in italy a field level analysis"
    - "gender differences in research collaboration"
    - "are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers an investigation on the italian university system"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a gender analysis of top scientists collaboration behavior evidence from italy"):
  with members:
    - "the collaboration behavior of top scientists"
    - "gender differences in scientific collaborations women are more egalitarian than men"
    - "variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "the collaboration behaviors of scientists in italy a field level analysis"
    - "gender differences in research collaboration"
    - "are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers an investigation on the italian university system"
    - "a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large scale research assessments"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "factors influencing cities publishing efficiency"):
  with members:
    - "the sum of it all revealing collaboration patterns by combining authorship and acknowledgements"
    - "a spatial scientometric analysis of the publication output of cities worldwide"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"
    - "evaluating university research same performance indicator different rankings"
    - "the european union china and the united states in the top 1 and top 10 layers of most frequently cited publications competition and collaborations"
    - "international scientific collaboration of china collaborating countries institutions and individuals"
    - "mapping excellence in the geography of science an approach based on scopus data"
    - "the detection of hot regions in the geography of science a visualization approach by using density maps"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)