human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "exploiting spatial interference alignment and opportunistic scheduling in the downlink of interference limited systems"
  Abstract: In this paper we analyze the performance of single stream and multi-stream spatial multiplexing (SM) systems employing opportunistic scheduling in the presence of interference. In the proposed downlink framework, every active user reports the post-processing signal-to-interference-plus-noise-power-ratio (post-SINR) or the receiver specific mutual information (MI) to its own transmitter using a feedback channel. The combination of scheduling and multi-antenna receiver processing leads to substantial interference suppression gain. Specifically, we show that opportunistic scheduling exploits spatial interference alignment (SIA) property inherent to a multi-user system for effective interference mitigation. We obtain bounds for the outage probability and the sum outage capacity for single stream and multi stream SM employing real or complex encoding for a symmetric interference channel model. #R##N#The techniques considered in this paper are optimal in different operating regimes. We show that the sum outage capacity can be maximized by reducing the SM rate to a value less than the maximum allowed value. The optimum SM rate depends on the number of interferers and the number of available active users. In particular, we show that the generalized multi-user SM (MU SM) method employing real-valued encoding provides a performance that is either comparable, or significantly higher than that of MU SM employing complex encoding. A combination of analysis and simulation is used to describe the trade-off between the multiplexing rate and sum outage capacity for different antenna configurations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "interference alignment improves the capacity of ofdm systems"):
  with members:
    - "limited feedback based interference alignment for interfering multi access channels"
    - "a distributed approach to interference alignment in ofdm based two tiered networks"
    - "interference alignment with incomplete csit sharing"
    - "on feasibility of interference alignment in mimo interference networks"
    - "on feasibility of interference alignment in mimo interference networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)