human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "data depth and design learning reliable models for skin lesion analysis"
  Abstract: Deep learning fostered a leap ahead in automated skin lesion analysis in the last two years. Those models are expensive to train and difficult to parameterize. Objective: We investigate methodological issues for designing and evaluating deep learning models for skin lesion analysis. We explore 10 choices faced by researchers: use of transfer learning, model architecture, train dataset, image resolution, type of data augmentation, input normalization, use of segmentation, duration of training, additional use of SVMs, and test data augmentation. Methods: We perform two full factorial experiments, for five different test datasets, resulting in 2560 exhaustive trials in our main experiment, and 1280 trials in our assessment of transfer learning. We analyze both with multi-way ANOVA. We use the exhaustive trials to simulate sequential decisions and ensembles, with and without the use of privileged information from the test set. Results -- main experiment: Amount of train data has disproportionate influence, explaining almost half the variation in performance. Of the other factors, test data augmentation and input resolution are the most influential. Deeper models, when combined, with extra data, also help. -- transfer experiment: Transfer learning is critical, its absence brings huge performance penalties. -- simulations: Ensembles of models are the best option to provide reliable results with limited resources, without using privileged information and sacrificing methodological rigor. Conclusions and Significance: Advancing research on automated skin lesion analysis requires curating larger public datasets. Indirect use of privileged information from the test set to design the models is a subtle, but frequent methodological mistake that leads to overoptimistic results. Ensembles of models are a cost-effective alternative to the expensive full-factorial and to the unstable sequential designs.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "de constructing bias on skin lesion datasets"):
  with members:
    - "skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection 2018 a challenge hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration isic"
    - "skin lesion synthesis with generative adversarial networks"
    - "data augmentation for skin lesion analysis"
    - "data depth and design learning reliable models for melanoma screening"
    - "inception v4 inception resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning"
    - "skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection a challenge at the 2017 international symposium on biomedical imaging isbi hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration isic"
    - "an overview of melanoma detection in dermoscopy images using image processing and machine learning"
    - "imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "deep learning ensembles for skin lesion segmentation analysis classification recod titans at isic challenge 2018"):
  with members:
    - "the ham10000 dataset a large collection of multi source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions"
    - "skin lesion synthesis with generative adversarial networks"
    - "ternausnet u net with vgg11 encoder pre trained on imagenet for image segmentation"
    - "data augmentation for skin lesion analysis"
    - "knowledge transfer for melanoma screening with deep learning"
    - "recod titans at isic challenge 2017"
    - "fusionnet a deep fully residual convolutional neural network for image segmentation in connectomics"
    - "towards automated melanoma screening proper computer vision reliable results"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "skin lesion synthesis with generative adversarial networks"):
  with members:
    - "data augmentation for skin lesion analysis"
    - "data depth and design learning reliable models for melanoma screening"
    - "progressive growing of gans for improved quality stability and variation"
    - "high resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans"
    - "recod titans at isic challenge 2017"
    - "towards automated melanoma screening proper computer vision reliable results"
    - "inception v4 inception resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning"
    - "skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection a challenge at the 2017 international symposium on biomedical imaging isbi hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration isic"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "lesion segmentation using u net network"):
  with members:
    - "the ham10000 dataset a large collection of multi source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions"
    - "u net convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)