human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "efficient squares and turing universality at temperature 1 with a unique negative glue"
  Abstract: Is Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM) "powerful?" Well, if certain tiles are required to "cooperate" in order to be able to bind to a growing tile assembly (a.k.a., temperature 2 self-assembly), then Turing universal computation and the efficient self-assembly of $N \times N$ squares is achievable in the aTAM (Rotemund and Winfree, STOC 2000). So yes, in a computational sense, the aTAM is quite powerful! However, if one completely removes this cooperativity condition (a.k.a., temperature 1 self-assembly), then the computational "power" of the aTAM (i.e., its ability to support Turing universal computation and the efficient self-assembly of $N \times N$ squares) becomes unknown. On the plus side, the aTAM, at temperature 1, isn't only Turing universal but also supports the efficient self-assembly $N \times N$ squares if self-assembly is allowed to utilize three spatial dimensions (Fu, Schweller and Cook, SODA 2011). We investigate the theoretical "power" of a seemingly simple, restrictive class of tile assembly systems (TASs) in which (1) the absolute value of every glue strength is 1, (2) there's a single negative strength glue type and (3) unequal glues can't interact. We call these the \emph{restricted glue} TASs (rgTAS). We first show the tile complexity of producing an $N \times N$ square with an rgTAS is $O(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n})$. We also prove that rgTASs are Turing universal with a construction that simulates an arbitrary Turing machine. Next, we provide results for a variation of the rgTAS class, partially restricted glue TASs, which is similar except that the magnitude of the negative glue's strength can only assumed to be $\ge 1$. These results consist of a construction with $O(\log n)$ tile complexity for building $N \times N$ squares, and one which simulates a Turing machine but with a greater scaling factor than for the rgTAS construction.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths"):
  with members:
    - "new bounds on the tile complexity of thin rectangles at temperature 1"
    - "the non cooperative tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal or capable of bounded turing machine simulation"
    - "flipping tiles concentration independent coin flips in tile self assembly"
    - "optimal self assembly of finite shapes at temperature 1 in 3d"
    - "computing in continuous space with self assembling polygonal tiles"
    - "universal computation with arbitrary polyomino tiles in non cooperative self assembly"
    - "the power of duples in self assembly it s not so hip to be square"
    - "a pumping lemma for non cooperative self assembly"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "non cooperatively assembling large structures a 2d pumping lemma cannot be as powerful as its 1d counterpart"):
  with members:
    - "the non cooperative tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal or capable of bounded turing machine simulation"
    - "computing in continuous space with self assembling polygonal tiles"
    - "universal computation with arbitrary polyomino tiles in non cooperative self assembly"
    - "the power of duples in self assembly it s not so hip to be square"
    - "a pumping lemma for non cooperative self assembly"
    - "intrinsic universality in tile self assembly requires cooperation"
    - "asynchronous signal passing for tile self assembly fuel efficient computation and efficient assembly of shapes"
    - "one tile to rule them all simulating any turing machine tile assembly system or tiling system with a single puzzle piece"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the non cooperative tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal or capable of bounded turing machine simulation"):
  with members:
    - "computing in continuous space with self assembling polygonal tiles"
    - "universal computation with arbitrary polyomino tiles in non cooperative self assembly"
    - "the power of duples in self assembly it s not so hip to be square"
    - "the two handed tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal"
    - "intrinsic universality in tile self assembly requires cooperation"
    - "intrinsic universality and the computational power of self assembly"
    - "asynchronous signal passing for tile self assembly fuel efficient computation and efficient assembly of shapes"
    - "one tile to rule them all simulating any turing machine tile assembly system or tiling system with a single puzzle piece"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a pumping lemma for non cooperative self assembly"):
  with members:
    - "universal computation with arbitrary polyomino tiles in non cooperative self assembly"
    - "the power of duples in self assembly it s not so hip to be square"
    - "the two handed tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal"
    - "intrinsic universality in tile self assembly requires cooperation"
    - "intrinsic universality and the computational power of self assembly"
    - "the self assembly of paths and squares at temperature 1"
    - "one tile to rule them all simulating any turing machine tile assembly system or tiling system with a single puzzle piece"
    - "two hands are better than one up to constant factors"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the self assembly of paths and squares at temperature 1"):
  with members:
    - "the two handed tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal"
    - "intrinsic universality in tile self assembly requires cooperation"
    - "intrinsic universality and the computational power of self assembly"
    - "the tile assembly model is intrinsically universal"
    - "the power of nondeterminism in self assembly"
    - "intrinsic universality in self assembly"
    - "temperature 1 self assembly deterministic assembly in 3d and probabilistic assembly in 2d"
    - "limitations of self assembly at temperature one extended abstract"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.ET(Emerging Technologies)