human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "further approximations for demand matching matroid constraints and minor closed graphs"
  Abstract: We pursue a study of the Generalized Demand Matching problem, a common generalization of the $b$-Matching and Knapsack problems. Here, we are given a graph with vertex capacities, edge profits, and asymmetric demands on the edges. The goal is to find a maximum-profit subset of edges so the demands of chosen edges do not violate vertex capacities. This problem is APX-hard and constant-factor approximations are known. #R##N#Our results fall into two categories. First, using iterated relaxation and various filtering strategies, we show with an efficient rounding algorithm if an additional matroid structure $\mathcal M$ is given and we further only allow sets $F \subseteq E$ that are independent in $\mathcal M$, the natural LP relaxation has an integrality gap of at most $\frac{25}{3} \approx 8.333$. This can be improved in various special cases, for example we improve over the 15-approximation for the previously-studied Coupled Placement problem [Korupolu et al. 2014] by giving a $7$-approximation. #R##N#Using similar techniques, we show the problem of computing a minimum-cost base in $\mathcal M$ satisfying vertex capacities admits a $(1,3)$-bicriteria approximation. This improves over the previous $(1,4)$-approximation in the special case that $\mathcal M$ is the graphic matroid over the given graph [Fukanaga and Nagamochi, 2009]. #R##N#Second, we show Demand Matching admits a polynomial-time approximation scheme in graphs that exclude a fixed minor. If all demands are polynomially-bounded integers, this is somewhat easy using dynamic programming in bounded-treewidth graphs. Our main technical contribution is a sparsification lemma allowing us to scale the demands to be used in a more intricate dynamic programming algorithm, followed by randomized rounding to filter our scaled-demand solution to a feasible solution.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)