human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads"
  Abstract: As breaking news unfolds people increasingly rely on social media to stay abreast of the latest updates. The use of social media in such situations comes with the caveat that new information being released piecemeal may encourage rumours, many of which remain unverified long after their point of release. Little is known, however, about the dynamics of the life cycle of a social media rumour. In this paper we present a methodology that has enabled us to collect, identify and annotate a dataset of 330 rumour threads (4,842 tweets) associated with 9 newsworthy events. We analyse this dataset to understand how users spread, support, or deny rumours that are later proven true or false, by distinguishing two levels of status in a rumour life cycle i.e., before and after its veracity status is resolved. The identification of rumours associated with each event, as well as the tweet that resolved each rumour as true or false, was performed by journalist members of the research team who tracked the events in real time. Our study shows that rumours that are ultimately proven true tend to be resolved faster than those that turn out to be false. Whilst one can readily see users denying rumours once they have been debunked, users appear to be less capable of distinguishing true from false rumours when their veracity remains in question. In fact, we show that the prevalent tendency for users is to support every unverified rumour. We also analyse the role of different types of users, finding that highly reputable users such as news organisations endeavour to post well-grounded statements, which appear to be certain and accompanied by evidence. Nevertheless, these often prove to be unverified pieces of information that give rise to false rumours. Our study reinforces the need for developing robust machine learning techniques that can provide assistance in real time for assessing the veracity of rumours. The findings of our study provide useful insights for achieving this aim.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "two path deep semi supervised learning for timely fake news detection"):
  with members:
    - "all in one multi task learning for rumour verification"
    - "a survey on natural language processing for fake news detection"
    - "liar liar pants on fire a new benchmark dataset for fake news detection"
    - "fake news detection on social media a data mining perspective"
    - "an overview of multi task learning in deep neural networks"
    - "csi a hybrid deep model for fake news detection"
    - "very deep convolutional networks for text classification"
    - "temporal ensembling for semi supervised learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "rp dnn a tweet level propagation context based deep neural networks for early rumor detection in social media"):
  with members:
    - "attention based neural architecture for rumor detection with author context awareness"
    - "neural language model based training data augmentation for weakly supervised early rumor detection"
    - "allennlp a deep semantic natural language processing platform"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"
    - "detection and resolution of rumours in social media a survey"
    - "evaluation of sentence embeddings in downstream and linguistic probing tasks"
    - "attention is all you need"
    - "csi a hybrid deep model for fake news detection"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fact check worthiness detection as positive unlabelled learning"):
  with members:
    - "citation needed a taxonomy and algorithmic assessment of wikipedia s verifiability"
    - "distantly supervised named entity recognition using positive unlabeled learning"
    - "claimrank detecting check worthy claims in arabic and english"
    - "automated fact checking task formulations methods and future directions"
    - "learning from positive and unlabeled data a survey"
    - "fine tuned language models for text classification"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "universal language model fine tuning for text classification"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "checkthat at clef 2020 enabling the automatic identification and verification of claims in social media"):
  with members:
    - "semeval 2016 task 3 community question answering"
    - "it takes nine to smell a rat neural multi task learning for check worthiness prediction"
    - "overview of the clef 2018 checkthat lab on automatic identification and verification of political claims task 1 check worthiness"
    - "semeval 2017 task 1 semantic textual similarity multilingual and crosslingual focused evaluation"
    - "fake news detection on social media a data mining perspective"
    - "fully automated fact checking using external sources"
    - "leveraging joint interactions for credibility analysis in news communities"
    - "tweetcred real time credibility assessment of content on twitter"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "supporting early and scalable discovery of disinformation websites"):
  with members:
    - "a retrospective analysis of the fake news challenge stance detection task"
    - "endorsements on social media an empirical study of affiliate marketing disclosures on youtube and pinterest"
    - "fakenewsnet a data repository with news content social context and dynamic information for studying fake news on social media"
    - "fever a large scale dataset for fact extraction and verification"
    - "trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media"
    - "fake news detection on social media a data mining perspective"
    - "computational fact checking from knowledge networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "use of a controlled experiment and computational models to measure the impact of sequential peer exposures on decision making"):
  with members:
    - "leveraging motifs to model the temporal dynamics of diffusion networks"
    - "impact of social influence on adoption behavior an online controlled experimental evaluation"
    - "cumulative effect in information diffusion empirical study on a microblogging network"
    - "what stops social epidemics"
    - "co evolution of selection and influence in social networks"
    - "a data based approach to social influence maximization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "towards understanding the information ecosystem through the lens of multiple web communities"):
  with members:
    - "characterizing the use of images by state sponsored troll accounts on twitter"
    - "characterizing the use of images in state sponsored information warfare operations by russian trolls on twitter"
    - "what is gab a bastion of free speech or an alt right echo chamber"
    - "a quantitative approach to understanding online antisemitism"
    - "who let the trolls out towards understanding state sponsored trolls"
    - "disinformation warfare understanding state sponsored trolls on twitter and their influence on the web"
    - "mobilizing the trump train understanding collective action in a political trolling community"
    - "false information on web and social media a survey"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "the web of false information rumors fake news hoaxes clickbait and various other shenanigans"):
  with members:
    - "what is gab a bastion of free speech or an alt right echo chamber"
    - "disinformation warfare understanding state sponsored trolls on twitter and their influence on the web"
    - "false information on web and social media a survey"
    - "it s always april fools day on the difficulty of social network misinformation classification via propagation features"
    - "liar liar pants on fire a new benchmark dataset for fake news detection"
    - "detection and analysis of 2016 us presidential election related rumors on twitter"
    - "this just in fake news packs a lot in title uses simpler repetitive content in text body more similar to satire than real news"
    - "fake news mitigation via point process based intervention"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)