human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "coding and decoding for the dynamic decode and forward relay protocol"
  Abstract: We study the Dynamic Decode and Forward (DDF) protocol for a single half-duplex relay, single-antenna channel with quasi-static fading. The DDF protocol is well-known and has been analyzed in terms of the Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff (DMT) in the infinite block length limit. We characterize the finite block length DMT and give new explicit code constructions. The finite block length analysis illuminates a few key aspects that have been neglected in the previous literature: 1) we show that one dominating cause of degradation with respect to the infinite block length regime is the event of decoding error at the relay; 2) we explicitly take into account the fact that the destination does not generally know a priori the relay decision time at which the relay switches from listening to transmit mode. Both the above problems can be tackled by a careful design of the decoding algorithm. In particular, we introduce a decision rejection criterion at the relay based on Forney's decision rule (a variant of the Neyman-Pearson rule), such that the relay triggers transmission only when its decision is reliable. Also, we show that a receiver based on the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test rule that jointly decodes the relay decision time and the information message achieves the optimal DMT. Our results show that no cyclic redundancy check (CRC) for error detection or additional protocol overhead to communicate the decision time are needed for DDF. Finally, we investigate the use of minimum mean squared error generalized decision feedback equalizer (MMSE-GDFE) lattice decoding at both the relay and the destination, and show that it provides near optimal performance at moderate complexity.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "multi relay selection design and analysis for multi stream cooperative communications"):
  with members:
    - "a simple cooperative diversity method based on network path selection"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "using distributed rotations for a low complexity dynamic decode and forward relay protocol"):
  with members:
    - "on the achievable diversity multiplexing tradeoffs in half duplex cooperative channels"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)