human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "flocking virtual machines in quest for responsive iot cloud services"
  Abstract: We propose Flock; a simple and scalable protocol that enables live migration of Virtual Machines (VMs) across heterogeneous edge and conventional cloud platforms to improve the responsiveness of cloud services. Flock is designed with properties that are suitable for the use cases of the Internet of Things (IoT). We describe the properties of regularized latency measurements that Flock can use for asynchronous and autonomous migration decisions. Such decisions allow communicating VMs to follow a flocking-like behavior that consists of three simple rules: separation, alignment, and cohesion. Using game theory, we derive analytical bounds on Flock's Price of Anarchy (PoA), and prove that flocking VMs converge to a Nash Equilibrium while settling in the best possible cloud platforms. We verify the effectiveness of Flock through simulations and discuss how its generic objective can simply be tweaked to achieve other objectives, such as cloud load balancing and energy consumption minimization.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "all one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms a complete survey"):
  with members:
    - "pcamp performance comparison of machine learning packages on the edges"
    - "are fpgas suitable for edge computing"
    - "cabaret leveraging recommendation systems for mobile edge caching"
    - "edge intelligence on demand deep learning model co inference with device edge synergy"
    - "fog computing a taxonomy survey and future directions"
    - "data analytics service composition and deployment on edge devices"
    - "live service migration in mobile edge clouds"
    - "on reducing iot service delay via fog offloading"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "qos aware dynamic fog service provisioning"):
  with members:
    - "live service migration in mobile edge clouds"
    - "enorm a framework for edge node resource management"
    - "dynamic service placement for mobile micro clouds with predicted future costs"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)