human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "noisy rumor spreading and plurality consensus"
  Abstract: Error-correcting codes are efficient methods for handling \emph{noisy} communication channels in the context of technological networks. However, such elaborate methods differ a lot from the unsophisticated way biological entities are supposed to communicate. Yet, it has been recently shown by Feinerman, Haeupler, and Korman {[}PODC 2014{]} that complex coordination tasks such as \emph{rumor spreading} and \emph{majority consensus} can plausibly be achieved in biological systems subject to noisy communication channels, where every message transferred through a channel remains intact with small probability $\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon$, without using coding techniques. This result is a considerable step towards a better understanding of the way biological entities may cooperate. It has been nevertheless be established only in the case of 2-valued \emph{opinions}: rumor spreading aims at broadcasting a single-bit opinion to all nodes, and majority consensus aims at leading all nodes to adopt the single-bit opinion that was initially present in the system with (relative) majority. In this paper, we extend this previous work to $k$-valued opinions, for any $k\geq2$. #R##N#Our extension requires to address a series of important issues, some conceptual, others technical. We had to entirely revisit the notion of noise, for handling channels carrying $k$-\emph{valued} messages. In fact, we precisely characterize the type of noise patterns for which plurality consensus is solvable. Also, a key result employed in the bivalued case by Feinerman et al. is an estimate of the probability of observing the most frequent opinion from observing the mode of a small sample. We generalize this result to the multivalued case by providing a new analytical proof for the bivalued case that is amenable to be extended, by induction, and that is of independent interest.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "noidy conmunixatipn on the convergence of the averaging population protocol"):
  with members:
    - "almost logarithmic time space optimal leader election in population protocols"
    - "fast space optimal leader election in population protocols"
    - "erasure correction for noisy radio networks"
    - "limits for rumor spreading in stochastic populations"
    - "ignore or comply on breaking symmetry in consensus"
    - "broadcasting in noisy radio networks"
    - "space optimal majority in population protocols"
    - "rapid asynchronous plurality consensus"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "distributed community detection via metastability of the 2 choices dynamics"):
  with members:
    - "pooling or sampling collective dynamics for electrical flow estimation"
    - "phase transition of the 2 choices dynamics on core periphery networks"
    - "the ants problem"
    - "limits for rumor spreading in stochastic populations"
    - "ignore or comply on breaking symmetry in consensus"
    - "distributed graph clustering and sparsification"
    - "average whenever you meet opportunistic protocols for community detection"
    - "a tight analysis of the parallel undecided state dynamics with two colors"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "consensus needs broadcast in noiseless models but can be exponentially easier in the presence of noise"):
  with members:
    - "ignore or comply on breaking symmetry in consensus"
    - "tight analysis for the 3 majority consensus dynamics"
    - "a tight analysis of the parallel undecided state dynamics with two colors"
    - "distributed computing with channel noise"
    - "breaking the log n barrier on rumor spreading"
    - "stabilizing consensus with many opinions"
    - "the power of two choices in distributed voting"
    - "plurality consensus in the gossip model"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "limits for rumor spreading in stochastic populations"):
  with members:
    - "minimizing message size in stochastic communication patterns fast self stabilizing protocols with 3 bits"
    - "information theoretic lower bounds for distributed function computation"
    - "breathe before speaking efficient information dissemination despite noisy limited and anonymous communication"
    - "global computation in a poorly connected world fast rumor spreading with no dependence on conductance"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)