human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "lock free dynamic hash tables with open addressing"
  Abstract: We present an efficient lock-free algorithm for parallel accessible hash tables with open addressing, which promises more robust performance and reliability than conventional lock-based implementations. ``Lock-free'' means that it is guaranteed that always at least one process completes its operation within a bounded number of steps. For a single processor architecture our solution is as efficient as sequential hash tables. On a multiprocessor architecture this is also the case when all processors have comparable speeds. The algorithm allows processors that have widely different speeds or come to a halt. It can easily be implemented using C-like languages and requires on average only constant time for insertion, deletion or accessing of elements. The algorithm allows the hash tables to grow and shrink when needed. #R##N#Lock-free algorithms are hard to design correctly, even when apparently straightforward. Ensuring the correctness of the design at the earliest possible stage is a major challenge in any responsible system development. In view of the complexity of the algorithm, we turned to the interactive theorem prover PVS for mechanical support. We employ standard deductive verification techniques to prove around 200 invariance properties of our algorithm, and describe how this is achieved with the theorem prover PVS.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "parallel wavelet tree construction"):
  with members:
    - "parallelism in randomized incremental algorithms"
    - "parallel local graph clustering"
    - "sorting with asymmetric read and write costs"
    - "efficient algorithms with asymmetric read and write costs"
    - "wavelet trees meet suffix trees"
    - "counting triangles in massive graphs with mapreduce"
    - "parallel graph decompositions using random shifts"
    - "skew strikes back new developments in the theory of join algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "verifying linearizability a comparative survey"):
  with members:
    - "between linearizability and quiescent consistency quantitative quiescent consistency"
    - "efficient lock free binary search trees"
    - "simplifying proofs of linearisability using layers of abstraction"
    - "linearizability with ownership transfer"
    - "proving linearisability via coarse grained abstraction"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)