human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "two models for noisy feedback in mimo channels"
  Abstract: Two distinct models of feedback, suited for FDD (Frequency Division Duplex) and TDD (Frequency Division Duplex) systems respectively, have been widely studied in the literature. In this paper, we compare these two models of feedback in terms of the diversity multiplexing tradeoff for varying amount of channel state information at the terminals. We find that, when all imperfections are accounted for, the maximum achievable diversity order in FDD systems matches the diversity order in TDD systems. TDD systems achieve better diversity order at higher multiplexing gains. In FDD systems, the maximum diversity order can be achieved with just a single bit of feedback. Additional bits of feedback (perfect or imperfect) do not affect the diversity order if the receiver does not know the channel state information.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bits about the channel multiround protocols for two way fading channels"):
  with members:
    - "power controlled feedback and training for two way mimo channels"
    - "outage behavior of slow fading channels with power control using noisy quantized csit"
    - "diversity order gain with noisy feedback in multiple access channels"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "power controlled feedback and training for two way mimo channels"):
  with members:
    - "bits about the channel multiround protocols for two way fading channels"
    - "limited rate channel state feedback for multicarrier block fading channels"
    - "outage behavior of slow fading channels with power control using noisy quantized csit"
    - "diversity order gain with noisy feedback in multiple access channels"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "coded modulation with mismatched csit over block fading channels"):
  with members:
    - "a tight lower bound to the outage probability of discrete input block fading channels"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)