human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "assume guarantee synthesis for concurrent reactive programs with partial information"
  Abstract: Synthesis of program parts is very useful for concurrent systems. However, most synthesis approaches do not support common design tasks, like modifying a single process without having to re-synthesize or verify the whole system. Assume-guarantee synthesis (AGS) provides robustness against modifications of system parts, but thus far has been limited to the perfect information setting. This means that local variables cannot be hidden from other processes, which renders synthesis results cumbersome or even impossible to realize. We resolve this shortcoming by defining AGS in a partial information setting. We analyze the complexity and decidability in different settings, showing that the problem has a high worst-case complexity and is undecidable in many interesting cases. Based on these observations, we present a pragmatic algorithm based on bounded synthesis, and demonstrate its practical applicability on several examples.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "distributed synthesis for parameterized temporal logics"):
  with members:
    - "encodings of bounded synthesis"
    - "distributed prompt ltl synthesis"
    - "parameterized linear temporal logics meet costs still not costlier than ltl"
    - "detecting unrealizability of distributed fault tolerant systems"
    - "parametric linear dynamic logic"
    - "optimal bounds in parametric ltl games"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the reactive synthesis competition syntcomp 2016 and beyond"):
  with members:
    - "solving qbf by abstraction"
    - "the first reactive synthesis competition syntcomp 2014"
    - "satisfiability based methods for reactive synthesis from safety specifications"
    - "the 3rd reactive synthesis competition syntcomp 2016 benchmarks participants results"
    - "a high level ltl synthesis format tlsf v1 1"
    - "specification format for reactive synthesis problems"
    - "the second reactive synthesis competition syntcomp 2015"
    - "compositional algorithms for succinct safety games"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)