human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "towards a new crown indicator an empirical analysis"
  Abstract: We present an empirical comparison between two normalization mechanisms for citation-based indicators of research performance. These mechanisms aim to normalize citation counts for the field and the year in which a publication was published. One mechanism is applied in the current so-called crown indicator of our institute. The other mechanism is applied in the new crown indicator that our institute is planning to adopt. We find that at high aggregation levels, such as at the level of large research institutions or at the level of countries, the differences between the two mechanisms are very small. At lower aggregation levels, such as at the level of research groups or at the level of journals, the differences between the two mechanisms are somewhat larger. We pay special attention to the way in which recent publications are handled. These publications typically have very low citation counts and should therefore be handled with special care.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "impact factor volatility to a single paper a comprehensive analysis"):
  with members:
    - "how a single paper affects the impact factor implications for scholarly publishing"
    - "citation success index an intuitive pair wise journal comparison metric"
    - "the use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data opportunities and limits"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields"):
  with members:
    - "dimensions a competitor to scopus and the web of science"
    - "google scholar web of science and scopus a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories"
    - "international research collaboration novelty conventionality and atypicality in knowledge recombination"
    - "the relationship among research productivity research collaboration and their determinants"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration an analysis based on data from f1000prime and normalized citation scores"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "female citation impact superiority 1996 2018 in six out of seven english speaking nations"):
  with members:
    - "do females create higher impact research scopus citations and mendeley readers for articles from five countries"
    - "gender and research publishing in india uniformly high inequality"
    - "the accuracy of confidence intervals for field normalised indicators"
    - "characterizing in text citations in scientific articles a large scale analysis"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"
    - "an empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators"):
  with members:
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "citation analysis with microsoft academic"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a comparison of university performance scores and ranks by mncs and fss"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "quality versus quantity in scientific impact"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and mendeley readership counts a large scale analysis of web of science publications"):
  with members:
    - "on the differences between citations and altmetrics an investigation of factors driving altmetrics vs citations for finnish articles"
    - "what makes papers visible on social media an analysis of various document characteristics"
    - "mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications"
    - "the discretised lognormal and hooked power law distributions for complete citation data best options for modelling and regression"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "interpreting altmetrics viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories"
    - "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature"
    - "regression for citation data an evaluation of different methods"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "field and time normalization of data with many zeros an empirical analysis using citation and twitter data"):
  with members:
    - "normalization of zero inflated data an empirical analysis of a new indicator family"
    - "measuring field normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups an altmetrics study based on mendeley data"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "grand challenges in altmetrics heterogeneity data quality and dependencies"
    - "national research impact indicators from mendeley readers"
    - "validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact a study using data from altmetric and f1000prime"
    - "tweets vs mendeley readers how do these two social media metrics differ"
    - "investigation of partition cells as a structural basis suitable for assessments of individual scientists"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "do females create higher impact research scopus citations and mendeley readers for articles from five countries"):
  with members:
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "the precision of the arithmetic mean geometric mean and percentiles for citation data an experimental simulation modelling approach"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"
    - "should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender"
    - "geometric journal impact factors correcting for individual highly cited articles"
    - "do altmetrics correlate with citations extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective"
    - "assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "the evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena in scholarly networks the case of the strategic management journal"):
  with members:
    - "the scaling relationship between citation based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences"
    - "quantifying long term scientific impact"
    - "betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks"
    - "cwts crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group s publication oeuvre"
    - "experience versus talent shapes the structure of the web"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)