human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "misspecified linear bandits"
  Abstract: We consider the problem of online learning in misspecified linear stochastic multi-armed bandit problems. Regret guarantees for state-of-the-art linear bandit algorithms such as Optimism in the Face of Uncertainty Linear bandit (OFUL) hold under the assumption that the arms expected rewards are perfectly linear in their features. It is, however, of interest to investigate the impact of potential misspecification in linear bandit models, where the expected rewards are perturbed away from the linear subspace determined by the arms features. Although OFUL has recently been shown to be robust to relatively small deviations from linearity, we show that any linear bandit algorithm that enjoys optimal regret performance in the perfectly linear setting (e.g., OFUL) must suffer linear regret under a sparse additive perturbation of the linear model. In an attempt to overcome this negative result, we define a natural class of bandit models characterized by a non-sparse deviation from linearity. We argue that the OFUL algorithm can fail to achieve sublinear regret even under models that have non-sparse deviation.We finally develop a novel bandit algorithm, comprising a hypothesis test for linearity followed by a decision to use either the OFUL or Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) algorithm. For perfectly linear bandit models, the algorithm provably exhibits OFULs favorable regret performance, while for misspecified models satisfying the non-sparse deviation property, the algorithm avoids the linear regret phenomenon and falls back on UCBs sublinear regret scaling. Numerical experiments on synthetic data, and on recommendation data from the public Yahoo! Learning to Rank Challenge dataset, empirically support our findings.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "learning near optimal policies with low inherent bellman error"):
  with members:
    - "provably efficient reinforcement learning with linear function approximation"
    - "on the optimality of sparse model based planning for markov decision processes"
    - "tighter problem dependent regret bounds in reinforcement learning without domain knowledge using value function bounds"
    - "frequentist regret bounds for randomized least squares value iteration"
    - "non asymptotic gap dependent regret bounds for tabular mdps"
    - "worst case regret bounds for exploration via randomized value functions"
    - "comments on the du kakade wang yang lower bounds"
    - "tight regret bounds for model based reinforcement learning with greedy policies"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "personalized heartsteps a reinforcement learning algorithm for optimizing physical activity"):
  with members:
    - "mitigating planner overfitting in model based reinforcement learning"
    - "a tutorial on thompson sampling"
    - "learning unknown markov decision processes a thompson sampling approach"
    - "encouraging physical activity in patients with diabetes intervention using a reinforcement learning system"
    - "data efficient off policy policy evaluation for reinforcement learning"
    - "doubly robust off policy value evaluation for reinforcement learning"
    - "how to discount deep reinforcement learning towards new dynamic strategies"
    - "learning to optimize via posterior sampling"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning contextual bandits in a non stationary environment"):
  with members:
    - "a change detection based framework for piecewise stationary multi armed bandit problem"
    - "efficient contextual bandits in non stationary worlds"
    - "on context dependent clustering of bandits"
    - "collaborative filtering bandits"
    - "online clustering of bandits"
    - "a gang of bandits"
    - "unbiased offline evaluation of contextual bandit based news article recommendation algorithms"
    - "a contextual bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)