human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a new piggybacking design for systematic mds storage codes"
  Abstract: Distributed storage codes have important applications in the design of modern storage systems. In a distributed storage system, every storage node has a probability to fail and once an individual storage node fails, it must be reconstructed using data stored in the surviving nodes. Computation load and network bandwidth are two important issues we need to concern when repairing a failed node. The traditional maximal distance separable (MDS) storage codes have low repair complexity but high repair bandwidth. On the contrary, minimal storage regenerating (MSR) codes have low repair bandwidth but high repair complexity. Fortunately, the newly introduced piggyback codes combine the advantages of both ones. #R##N#In this paper, by introducing a novel piggybacking design framework for systematic MDS codes, we construct a storage code whose average repair bandwidth rate, i.e., the ratio of average repair bandwidth and the amount of the original data, can be as low as $\frac{\sqrt{2r-1}}{r}$, which significantly improves the ratio $\frac{r-1}{2r-1}$ of the previous result. In the meanwhile, every failed systematic node of the new code can be reconstructed quickly using the decoding algorithm of an MDS code, only with some additional additions over the underlying finite field. This is very fast compared with the complex matrix multiplications needed in the repair of a failed node of an MSR code.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hashtag erasure codes from theory to practice"):
  with members:
    - "repair duality with locally repairable and locally regenerating codes"
    - "locally repairable and locally regenerating codes obtained by parity splitting of hashtag codes"
    - "general sub packetized access optimal regenerating codes"
    - "explicit constructions of high rate mds array codes with optimal repair bandwidth"
    - "explicit constructions of optimal access mds codes with nearly optimal sub packetization"
    - "a high rate msr code with polynomial sub packetization level"
    - "an alternate construction of an access optimal regenerating code with optimal sub packetization level"
    - "zigzag codes mds array codes with optimal rebuilding"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)