human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "resolving the geometric locus dilemma for support vector learning machines"
  Abstract: Capacity control, the bias/variance dilemma, and learning unknown functions from data, are all concerned with identifying effective and consistent fits of unknown geometric loci to random data points. A geometric locus is a curve or surface formed by points, all of which possess some uniform property. A geometric locus of an algebraic equation is the set of points whose coordinates are solutions of the equation. Any given curve or surface must pass through each point on a specified locus. This paper argues that it is impossible to fit random data points to algebraic equations of partially configured geometric loci that reference arbitrary Cartesian coordinate systems. It also argues that the fundamental curve of a linear decision boundary is actually a principal eigenaxis. It is shown that learning principal eigenaxes of linear decision boundaries involves finding a point of statistical equilibrium for which eigenenergies of principal eigenaxis components are symmetrically balanced with each other. It is demonstrated that learning linear decision boundaries involves strong duality relationships between a statistical eigenlocus of principal eigenaxis components and its algebraic forms, in primal and dual, correlated Hilbert spaces. Locus equations are introduced and developed that describe principal eigen-coordinate systems for lines, planes, and hyperplanes. These equations are used to introduce and develop primal and dual statistical eigenlocus equations of principal eigenaxes of linear decision boundaries. Important generalizations for linear decision boundaries are shown to be encoded within a dual statistical eigenlocus of principal eigenaxis components. Principal eigenaxes of linear decision boundaries are shown to encode Bayes' likelihood ratio for common covariance data and a robust likelihood ratio for all other data.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "design of data driven mathematical laws for optimal statistical classification systems"):
  with members:
    - "provable inductive matrix completion"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)