human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "derandomizing the isolation lemma and lower bounds for circuit size"
  Abstract: The isolation lemma of Mulmuley et al \cite{MVV87} is an important tool in the design of randomized algorithms and has played an important role in several nontrivial complexity upper bounds. On the other hand, polynomial identity testing is a well-studied algorithmic problem with efficient randomized algorithms and the problem of obtaining efficient \emph{deterministic} identity tests has received a lot of attention recently. The goal of this note is to compare the isolation lemma with polynomial identity testing: 1. We show that derandomizing reasonably restricted versions of the isolation lemma implies circuit size lower bounds. We derive the circuit lower bounds by examining the connection between the isolation lemma and polynomial identity testing. We give a randomized polynomial-time identity test for noncommutative circuits of polynomial degree based on the isolation lemma. Using this result, we show that derandomizing the isolation lemma implies noncommutative circuit size lower bounds. The restricted versions of the isolation lemma we consider are natural and would suffice for the standard applications of the isolation lemma. 2. From the result of Klivans-Spielman \cite{KS01} we observe that there is a randomized polynomial-time identity test for commutative circuits of polynomial degree, also based on a more general isolation lemma for linear forms. Consequently, derandomization of (a suitable version of) this isolation lemma also implies circuit size lower bounds in the commutative setting.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the matching problem in general graphs is in quasi nc"):
  with members:
    - "bipartite perfect matching is in quasi nc"
    - "deterministically isolating a perfect matching in bipartite planar graphs"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "bipartite perfect matching is in quasi nc"):
  with members:
    - "deterministically isolating a perfect matching in bipartite planar graphs"
    - "reducing randomness via irrational numbers"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on the lattice isomorphism problem"):
  with members:
    - "classical hardness of learning with errors"
    - "tensor based hardness of the shortest vector problem to within almost polynomial factors"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "revisiting the equivalence problem for finite multitape automata"):
  with members:
    - "on the complexity of equivalence and minimisation for q weighted automata"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "solving connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth in single exponential time"):
  with members:
    - "slightly superexponential parameterized problems"
    - "on feedback vertex set new measure and new structures"
    - "narrow sieves for parameterized paths and packings"
    - "determinant sums for undirected hamiltonicity"
    - "known algorithms on graphs of bounded treewidth are probably optimal"
    - "fpt algorithms for connected feedback vertex set"
    - "approximation schemes for steiner forest on planar graphs and graphs of bounded treewidth"
    - "the traveling salesman problem for cubic graphs"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "dynamic programming for graphs on surfaces"):
  with members:
    - "slightly superexponential parameterized problems"
    - "efficient approximation for triangulation of minimum treewidth"
    - "solving connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth in single exponential time"
    - "known algorithms on graphs of bounded treewidth are probably optimal"
    - "dynamic generators of topologically embedded graphs"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "space complexity of perfect matching in bounded genus bipartite graphs"):
  with members:
    - "deterministically isolating a perfect matching in bipartite planar graphs"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)