human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "an empirical evaluation of impact of refactoring on internal and external measures of code quality"
  Abstract: Refactoring is the process of improving the design of existing code by changing its internal structure without affecting its external behaviour, with the main aims of improving the quality of software product. Therefore, there is a belief that refactoring improves quality factors such as understandability, flexibility, and reusability. However, there is limited empirical evidence to support such assumptions. The objective of this study is to validate/invalidate the claims that refactoring improves software quality. The impact of selected refactoring techniques was assessed using both external and internal measures. Ten refactoring techniques were evaluated through experiments to assess external measures: Resource Utilization, Time Behaviour, Changeability and Analysability which are ISO external quality factors and five internal measures: Maintainability Index, Cyclomatic Complexity, Depth of Inheritance, Class Coupling and Lines of Code. The result of external measures did not show any improvements in code quality after the refactoring treatment. However, from internal measures, maintainability index indicated an improvement in code quality of refactored code than non-refactored code and other internal measures did not indicate any positive effect on refactored code

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "how does object oriented code refactoring influence software quality research landscape and challenges"):
  with members:
    - "multirefactor automated refactoring to improve software quality"
    - "why we refactor confessions of github contributors"
    - "identifying clusters of concepts in a low cohesive class for extract class refactoring using metrics supplemented agglomerative clustering technique"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)