human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "testing mutual duality of planar graphs"
  Abstract: We introduce and study the problem \mpd, which asks for two planar graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ whether $G_1$ can be embedded such that its dual is isomorphic to $G_2$. Our algorithmic main result is an NP-completeness proof for the general case and a linear-time algorithm for biconnected graphs. To shed light onto the combinatorial structure of the duals of a planar graph, we consider the \emph{common dual relation} $\sim$, where $G_1 \sim G_2$ if and only if they have a common dual. While $\sim$ is generally not transitive, we show that the restriction to biconnected graphs is an equivalence relation. In this case, being dual to each other carries over to the equivalence classes, i.e., two graphs are dual to each other if and only if any two elements of their respective equivalence classes are dual to each other. #R##N#To achieve the efficient testing algorithm for \mpd on biconnected graphs, we devise a succinct representation of the equivalence class of a biconnected planar graph. It is similar to SPQR-trees and represents exactly the graphs that are contained in the equivalence class. The testing algorithm then works by testing in linear time whether two such representations are isomorphic. We note that a special case of \mpd is testing whether a graph $G$ is self-dual. Our algorithm handles the case where $G$ is biconnected and our NP-hardness proof extends to testing self-duality of general planar graphs and also to testing map self-duality, where a graph $G$ is map self-dual if it admits a planar embedding $\mathcal G$ such that $G^\star$ is isomorphic to $G$, and additionally the embedding induced by $\mathcal G$ on $G^\star$ is $\mathcal G$.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "decremental spqr trees for planar graphs"):
  with members:
    - "dynamic planar embeddings of dynamic graphs"
    - "decremental single source reachability in planar digraphs"
    - "dynamic minimum spanning forest with subpolynomial worst case update time"
    - "fully dynamic maximal matching in constant update time"
    - "popular conjectures as a barrier for dynamic planar graph algorithms"
    - "fully dynamic minimum spanning forest with improved worst case update time"
    - "faster worst case deterministic dynamic connectivity"
    - "popular conjectures imply strong lower bounds for dynamic problems"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)