human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "preventing fairness gerrymandering auditing and learning for subgroup fairness"
  Abstract: The most prevalent notions of fairness in machine learning are statistical definitions: they fix a small collection of pre-defined groups, and then ask for parity of some statistic of the classifier across these groups. Constraints of this form are susceptible to intentional or inadvertent "fairness gerrymandering", in which a classifier appears to be fair on each individual group, but badly violates the fairness constraint on one or more structured subgroups defined over the protected attributes. We propose instead to demand statistical notions of fairness across exponentially (or infinitely) many subgroups, defined by a structured class of functions over the protected attributes. This interpolates between statistical definitions of fairness and recently proposed individual notions of fairness, but raises several computational challenges. It is no longer clear how to audit a fixed classifier to see if it satisfies such a strong definition of fairness. We prove that the computational problem of auditing subgroup fairness for both equality of false positive rates and statistical parity is equivalent to the problem of weak agnostic learning, which means it is computationally hard in the worst case, even for simple structured subclasses. #R##N#We then derive two algorithms that provably converge to the best fair classifier, given access to oracles which can solve the agnostic learning problem. The algorithms are based on a formulation of subgroup fairness as a two-player zero-sum game between a Learner and an Auditor. Our first algorithm provably converges in a polynomial number of steps. Our second algorithm enjoys only provably asymptotic convergence, but has the merit of simplicity and faster per-step computation. We implement the simpler algorithm using linear regression as a heuristic oracle, and show that we can effectively both audit and learn fair classifiers on real datasets.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "to split or not to split the impact of disparate treatment in classification"):
  with members:
    - "algorithmic fairness"
    - "recovering from biased data can fairness constraints improve accuracy"
    - "repairing without retraining avoiding disparate impact with counterfactual distributions"
    - "a framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning"
    - "optimized score transformation for fair classification"
    - "fairness with minimal harm a pareto optimal approach for healthcare"
    - "obfuscation via information density estimation"
    - "welfare and distributional impacts of fair classification"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "theory in theory out how social theory can solve problems that machine learning can t"):
  with members:
    - "50 years of test un fairness lessons for machine learning"
    - "towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness"
    - "racial categories in machine learning"
    - "garbage in garbage out do machine learning application papers in social computing report where human labeled training data comes from"
    - "universal adversarial triggers for attacking and analyzing nlp"
    - "measurement and fairness"
    - "privacy ethics and data access a case study of the fragile families challenge"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "theory in theory out the uses of social theory in machine learning for social science"):
  with members:
    - "50 years of test un fairness lessons for machine learning"
    - "towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness"
    - "racial categories in machine learning"
    - "garbage in garbage out do machine learning application papers in social computing report where human labeled training data comes from"
    - "privacy ethics and data access a case study of the fragile families challenge"
    - "an intersectional definition of fairness"
    - "automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language"
    - "attention is all you need"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "balancing competing objectives with noisy data score based classifiers for welfare aware machine learning"):
  with members:
    - "a longitudinal analysis of youtube s promotion of conspiracy videos"
    - "the disparate equilibria of algorithmic decision making when individuals invest rationally"
    - "fairness and utilization in allocating resources with uncertain demand"
    - "fair classification and social welfare"
    - "noise tolerant fair classification"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "welfare and distributional impacts of fair classification"
    - "a flexible framework for multi objective bayesian optimization using random scalarizations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "removing disparate impact of differentially private stochastic gradient descent on model accuracy"):
  with members:
    - "differentially private and fair classification via calibrated functional mechanism"
    - "differential privacy has disparate impact on model accuracy"
    - "differentially private learning with adaptive clipping"
    - "robust anomaly detection and backdoor attack detection via differential privacy"
    - "adaclip adaptive clipping for private sgd"
    - "concentrated differentially private gradient descent with adaptive per iteration privacy budget"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "learning adversarially fair and transferable representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "on the fairness of randomized trials for recommendation with heterogeneous demographics and beyond"):
  with members:
    - "average individual fairness algorithms generalization and experiments"
    - "fairness in recommendation ranking through pairwise comparisons"
    - "policy learning for fairness in ranking"
    - "less is better unweighted data subsampling via influence function"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "learning optimal fair policies"
    - "causal embeddings for recommendation"
    - "deepfm a factorization machine based neural network for ctr prediction"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "saving face investigating the ethical concerns of facial recognition auditing"):
  with members:
    - "diversity in faces"
    - "model cards for model reporting"
    - "deep learning for face recognition pride or prejudiced"
    - "racial categories in machine learning"
    - "oxford handbook on ai ethics book chapter on race and gender"
    - "datasheets for datasets"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"):
  with members:
    - "debiasing community detection the importance of lowly connected nodes"
    - "50 years of test un fairness lessons for machine learning"
    - "diversity in faces"
    - "on measuring social biases in sentence encoders"
    - "equalizing gender biases in neural machine translation with word embeddings techniques"
    - "fair regression quantitative definitions and reduction based algorithms"
    - "proportionally fair clustering"
    - "a framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)