human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "local search is better than random assignment for bounded occurrence ordering k csps"
  Abstract: We prove that the Bounded Occurrence Ordering k-CSP Problem is not approximation resistant. We give a very simple local search algorithm that always performs better than the random assignment algorithm. Specifically, the expected value of the solution returned by the algorithm is at least Alg > Avg + a(B,k) (Opt - Avg), where "Opt" is the value of the optimal solution; "Avg" is the expected value of the random solution; and a(B,k)=Omega_k(B^{-(k+O(1))} is a parameter depending only on "k" (the arity of the CSP) and "B" (the maximum number of times each variable is used in constraints). The question whether bounded occurrence ordering k-CSPs are approximation resistant was raised by Guruswami and Zhou (APPROX 2012) who recently showed that bounded occurrence 3-CSPs and "monotone" k-CSPs admit a non-trivial approximation.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "satisfiability of ordering csps above average"):
  with members:
    - "analysis of boolean functions"
    - "simultaneously satisfying linear equations over mathbb f _2 maxlin2 and max r lin2 parameterized above average"
    - "constraint satisfaction problems parameterized above or below tight bounds a survey"
    - "parameterized complexity of maxsat above average"
    - "all ternary permutation constraint satisfaction problems parameterized above average have kernels with quadratic numbers of variables"
    - "betweenness parameterized above tight lower bound"
    - "a probabilistic approach to problems parameterized above or below tight bounds"
    - "solving max r sat above a tight lower bound"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "beating the random assignment on constraint satisfaction problems of bounded degree"):
  with members:
    - "analysis of boolean functions"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)