human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "certified connection tableaux proofs for hol light and tptp"
  Abstract: In the recent years, the Metis prover based on ordered paramodulation and model elimination has replaced the earlier built-in methods for general-purpose proof automation in HOL4 and Isabelle/HOL. In the annual CASC competition, the leanCoP system based on connection tableaux has however performed better than Metis. In this paper we show how the leanCoP's core algorithm can be implemented inside HOLLight. leanCoP's flagship feature, namely its minimalistic core, results in a very simple proof system. This plays a crucial role in extending the MESON proof reconstruction mechanism to connection tableaux proofs, providing an implementation of leanCoP that certifies its proofs. We discuss the differences between our direct implementation using an explicit Prolog stack, to the continuation passing implementation of MESON present in HOLLight and compare their performance on all core HOLLight goals. The resulting prover can be also used as a general purpose TPTP prover. We compare its performance against the resolution based Metis on TPTP and other interesting datasets.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards finding longer proofs"):
  with members:
    - "enigma ng efficient neural and gradient boosted inference guidance for e"
    - "the minerl competition on sample efficient reinforcement learning using human priors"
    - "meta learning of sequential strategies"
    - "grunge a grand unified atp challenge"
    - "analysing mathematical reasoning abilities of neural models"
    - "graph representations for higher order logic and theorem proving"
    - "learning to speak and act in a fantasy text adventure game"
    - "hammering mizar by learning clause guidance"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "monte carlo tableau proof search"):
  with members:
    - "internal guidance for satallax"
    - "leopard a generic platform for the implementation of higher order reasoners"
    - "mizar 40 for mizar 40"
    - "premise selection for mathematics by corpus analysis and kernel methods"
    - "learning assisted automated reasoning with flyspeck"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "towards the integration of an intuitionistic first order prover into coq"):
  with members:
    - "hol y hammer online atp service for hol light"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)