human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "impact of knowledge on election time in anonymous networks"
  Abstract: Leader election is one of the basic problems in distributed computing. For anonymous networks, the task of leader election is formulated as follows: every node v of the network must output a simple path, which is coded as a sequence of port numbers, such that all these paths end at a common node, the leader. In this paper, we study deterministic leader election in arbitrary anonymous networks. It is well known that leader election is impossible in some networks, regardless of the allocated amount of time, even if nodes know the map of the network. However, even in networks in which it is possible to elect a leader knowing the map, the task may be still impossible without any knowledge, regardless of the allocated time. On the other hand, for any network in which leader election is possible knowing the map, there is a minimum time, called the election index, in which this can be done. Informally, the election index of a network is the minimum depth at which views of all nodes are distinct. Our aim is to establish tradeoffs between the allocated time $\tau$ and the amount of information that has to be given a priori to the nodes to enable leader election in time $\tau$ in all networks for which leader election in this time is at all possible. Following the framework of algorithms with advice, this information is provided to all nodes at the start by an oracle knowing the entire network. The length of this string (its number of bits) is called the size of advice. For a given time $\tau$ allocated to leader election, we give upper and lower bounds on the minimum size of advice sufficient to perform leader election in time $\tau$. We focus on the two sides of the time spectrum and give tight (or almost tight) bounds on the minimum size of advice for these extremes. We also show that constant advice is not sufficient for leader election in all graphs, regardless of the allocated time.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "advice complexity of treasure hunt in geometric terrains"):
  with members:
    - "the graph exploration problem with advice"
    - "reaching a target in the plane with no information"
    - "topology recognition with advice"
    - "deterministic graph exploration with advice"
    - "tradeoffs between cost and information for rendezvous and treasure hunt"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "cost vs information tradeoffs for treasure hunt in the plane"):
  with members:
    - "information complexity of treasure hunt in geometric terrains"
    - "the graph exploration problem with advice"
    - "reaching a target in the plane with no information"
    - "topology recognition with advice"
    - "deterministic graph exploration with advice"
    - "time vs information tradeoffs for leader election in anonymous trees"
    - "tradeoffs between cost and information for rendezvous and treasure hunt"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "information complexity of treasure hunt in geometric terrains"):
  with members:
    - "the graph exploration problem with advice"
    - "reaching a target in the plane with no information"
    - "topology recognition with advice"
    - "deterministic graph exploration with advice"
    - "time vs information tradeoffs for leader election in anonymous trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "deterministic leader election takes theta d log n bit rounds"):
  with members:
    - "knowledge level of symmetry and time of leader election"
    - "sublinear bounds for randomized leader election"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "deterministic graph exploration with advice"):
  with members:
    - "topology recognition with advice"
    - "time vs information tradeoffs for leader election in anonymous trees"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)