human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on optimal ternary locally repairable codes"
  Abstract: In an $[n,k,d]$ linear code, a code symbol is said to have locality $r$ if it can be repaired by accessing at most $r$ other code symbols. For an $(n,k,r)$ \emph{locally repairable code} (LRC), the minimum distance satisfies the well-known Singleton-like bound $d\le n-k-\lceil k/r\rceil +2$. In this paper, we study optimal ternary LRCs meeting this Singleton-like bound by employing a parity-check matrix approach. It is proved that there are only $8$ classes of possible parameters with which optimal ternary LRCs exist. Moreover, we obtain explicit constructions of optimal ternary LRCs for all these $8$ classes of parameters, where the minimum distance could only be 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "erasure codes for distributed storage tight bounds and matching constructions"):
  with members:
    - "explicit msr codes with optimal access optimal sub packetization and small field size for d k 1 k 2 k 3"
    - "a tight rate bound and a matching construction for locally recoverable codes with sequential recovery from any number of multiple erasures"
    - "optimal lrc codes for all lenghts n q"
    - "optimal locally repairable codes of distance 3 and 4 via cyclic codes"
    - "liquid cloud storage"
    - "rate optimal binary linear locally repairable codes with small availability"
    - "bounds and constructions of codes with all symbol locality and availability"
    - "a study on the impact of locality in the decoding of binary cyclic codes"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on the weight hierarchy of locally repairable codes"):
  with members:
    - "bounds and constructions of locally repairable codes parity check matrix approach"
    - "cyclic lrc codes and their subfield subcodes"
    - "weight enumerators and higher support weights of maximally recoverable codes"
    - "locally recoverable codes on algebraic curves"
    - "repair locality from a combinatorial perspective"
    - "codes with locality for two erasures"
    - "an integer programming based bound for locally repairable codes"
    - "a family of optimal locally recoverable codes"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)