human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "transceiver design with low precision analog to digital conversion an information theoretic perspective"
  Abstract: Modern communication receiver architectures center around digital signal processing (DSP), with the bulk of the receiver processing being performed on digital signals obtained after analog-to-digital conversion (ADC). In this paper, we explore Shannon-theoretic performance limits when ADC precision is drastically reduced, from typical values of 8-12 bits used in current communication transceivers, to 1-3 bits. The goal is to obtain insight on whether DSP-centric transceiver architectures are feasible as communication bandwidths scale up, recognizing that high-precision ADC at high sampling rates is either unavailable, or too costly or power-hungry. Specifically, we evaluate the communication limits imposed by low-precision ADC for the ideal real discrete-time Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel, under an average power constraint on the input. For an ADC with K quantization bins (i.e., a precision of log2 K bits), we show that the Shannon capacity is achievable by a discrete input distribution with at most K + 1 mass points. For 2-bin (1-bit) symmetric ADC, this result is tightened to show that binary antipodal signaling is optimum for any signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). For multi-bit ADC, the capacity is computed numerically, and the results obtained are used to make the following encouraging observations regarding system design with low-precision ADC : (a) even at moderately high SNR of up to 20 dB, 2-3 bit quantization results in only 10-20% reduction of spectral efficiency, which is acceptable for large communication bandwidths, (b) standard equiprobable pulse amplitude modulation with ADC thresholds set to implement maximum likelihood hard decisions is asymptotically optimum at high SNR, and works well at low to moderate SNRs as well.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)