human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "feeling the bern adaptive estimators for bernoulli probabilities of pairwise comparisons"
  Abstract: We study methods for aggregating pairwise comparison data in order to estimate outcome probabilities for future comparisons among a collection of n items. Working within a flexible framework that imposes only a form of strong stochastic transitivity (SST), we introduce an adaptivity index defined by the indifference sets of the pairwise comparison probabilities. In addition to measuring the usual worst-case risk of an estimator, this adaptivity index also captures the extent to which the estimator adapts to instance-specific difficulty relative to an oracle estimator. We prove three main results that involve this adaptivity index and different algorithms. First, we propose a three-step estimator termed Count-Randomize-Least squares (CRL), and show that it has adaptivity index upper bounded as $\sqrt{n}$ up to logarithmic factors. We then show that that conditional on the hardness of planted clique, no computationally efficient estimator can achieve an adaptivity index smaller than $\sqrt{n}$. Second, we show that a regularized least squares estimator can achieve a poly-logarithmic adaptivity index, thereby demonstrating a $\sqrt{n}$-gap between optimal and computationally achievable adaptivity. Finally, we prove that the standard least squares estimator, which is known to be optimally adaptive in several closely related problems, fails to adapt in the context of estimating pairwise probabilities.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "uncertainty about uncertainty near optimal adaptive algorithms for estimating binary mixtures of unknown coins"):
  with members:
    - "maximum selection and ranking under noisy comparisons"
    - "beyond talagrand functions new lower bounds for testing monotonicity and unateness"
    - "learning populations of parameters"
    - "a data quality metric dqm how to estimate the number of undetected errors in data sets"
    - "a polynomial lower bound for testing monotonicity"
    - "approval voting and incentives in crowdsourcing"
    - "simple robust and optimal ranking from pairwise comparisons"
    - "testing probability distributions underlying aggregated data"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reducibility and computational lower bounds for problems with planted sparse structure"):
  with members:
    - "sherali adams integrality gaps matching the log density threshold"
    - "on finding dense common subgraphs"
    - "robust sparse estimation tasks in high dimensions"
    - "the power of sum of squares for detecting hidden structures"
    - "bayesian estimation from few samples community detection and related problems"
    - "sum of squares lower bounds for refuting any csp"
    - "statistical query lower bounds for robust estimation of high dimensional gaussians and gaussian mixtures"
    - "minimizing the union tight approximations for small set bipartite vertex expansion"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "worst case vs average case design for estimation from fixed pairwise comparisons"):
  with members:
    - "active ranking from pairwise comparisons and when parametric assumptions don t help"
    - "competitive analysis of the top k ranking problem"
    - "top k ranking from pairwise comparisons when spectral ranking is optimal"
    - "a permutation based model for crowd labeling optimal estimation and robustness"
    - "spectral mle top k rank aggregation from pairwise comparisons"
    - "estimation from pairwise comparisons sharp minimax bounds with topology dependence"
    - "simple robust and optimal ranking from pairwise comparisons"
    - "active ranking using pairwise comparisons"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "simple robust and optimal ranking from pairwise comparisons"):
  with members:
    - "spectral mle top k rank aggregation from pairwise comparisons"
    - "estimation from pairwise comparisons sharp minimax bounds with topology dependence"
    - "a topic modeling approach to ranking"
    - "active ranking using pairwise comparisons"
    - "noisy sorting without resampling"
    - "optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)