human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "one representation per word does it make sense for composition"
  Abstract: In this paper, we investigate whether an a priori disambiguation of word senses is strictly necessary or whether the meaning of a word in context can be disambiguated through composition alone. We evaluate the performance of off-the-shelf single-vector and multi-sense vector models on a benchmark phrase similarity task and a novel task for word-sense discrimination. We find that single-sense vector models perform as well or better than multi-sense vector models despite arguably less clean elementary representations. Our findings furthermore show that simple composition functions such as pointwise addition are able to recover sense specific information from a single-sense vector model remarkably well.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "temporal and aspectual entailment"):
  with members:
    - "collecting diverse natural language inference problems for sentence representation evaluation"
    - "allennlp a deep semantic natural language processing platform"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"
    - "using j k fold cross validation to reduce variance when tuning nlp models"
    - "supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data"
    - "attention is all you need"
    - "advances in pre training distributed word representations"
    - "improving semantic composition with offset inference"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "from word to sense embeddings a survey on vector representations of meaning"):
  with members:
    - "a survey of cross lingual word embedding models"
    - "towards better ud parsing deep contextualized word embeddings ensemble and treebank concatenation"
    - "seven augmenting word embeddings with unsupervised relation vectors"
    - "incorporating glosses into neural word sense disambiguation"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"
    - "wic 10 000 example pairs for evaluating context sensitive representations"
    - "knowledge based word sense disambiguation using topic models"
    - "a robust self learning method for fully unsupervised cross lingual mappings of word embeddings"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)