human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "rate adaptation via link layer feedback for goodput maximization over a time varying channel"
  Abstract: We consider adapting the transmission rate to maximize the goodput, i.e., the amount of data transmitted without error, over a continuous Markov flat-fading wireless channel. In particular, we consider schemes in which transmitter channel state is inferred from degraded causal error-rate feedback, such as packet-level ACK/NAKs in an automatic repeat request (ARQ) system. In such schemes, the choice of transmission rate affects not only the subsequent goodput but also the subsequent feedback, implying that the optimal rate schedule is given by a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP). Because solution of the POMDP is computationally impractical, we consider simple suboptimal greedy rate assignment and show that the optimal scheme would itself be greedy if the error-rate feedback was non-degraded. Furthermore, we show that greedy rate assignment using non-degraded feedback yields a total goodput that upper bounds that of optimal rate assignment using degraded feedback. We then detail the implementation of the greedy scheme and propose a reduced-complexity greedy scheme that adapts the transmission rate only once per block of packets. We also investigate the performance of the schemes numerically, and show that the proposed greedy scheme achieves steady-state goodputs that are reasonably close to the upper bound on goodput calculated using non-degraded feedback. A similar improvement is obtained in steady-state goodput, drop rate, and average buffer occupancy in the presence of data buffers. We also investigate an upper bound on the performance of optimal rate assignment for a discrete approximation of the channel and show that such quantization leads to a significant loss in achievable goodput.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "energy efficiency and goodput analysis in two way wireless relay networks"):
  with members:
    - "energy efficiency analysis in amplify and forward and decode and forward cooperative networks"
    - "coding versus arq in fading channels how reliable should the phy be"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "scheduling with rate adaptation under incomplete knowledge of channel estimator statistics"):
  with members:
    - "distributed opportunistic scheduling for ad hoc communications under noisy channel estimation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)