human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on low space differentially private low rank factorization in the spectral norm"
  Abstract: Low-rank factorization is used in many areas of computer science where one performs spectral analysis on large sensitive data stored in the form of matrices. In this paper, we study differentially private low-rank factorization of a matrix with respect to the spectral norm in the turnstile update model. In this problem, given an input matrix $\mathbf{A} \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ updated in the turnstile manner and a target rank $k$, the goal is to find two rank-$k$ orthogonal matrices $\mathbf{U}_k \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times k}$ and $\mathbf{V}_k \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times k}$, and one positive semidefinite diagonal matrix $\textbf{\Sigma}_k \in \mathbb{R}^{k \times k}$ such that $\mathbf{A} \approx \mathbf{U}_k \textbf{\Sigma}_k \mathbf{V}_k^\mathsf{T}$ with respect to the spectral norm. #R##N#Our main contributions are two computationally efficient and sub-linear space algorithms for computing a differentially private low-rank factorization. We consider two levels of privacy. In the first level of privacy, we consider two matrices neighboring if their difference has a Frobenius norm at most $1$. In the second level of privacy, we consider two matrices as neighboring if their difference can be represented as an outer product of two unit vectors. Both these privacy levels are stronger than those studied in the earlier papers such as Dwork {\it et al.} (STOC 2014), Hardt and Roth (STOC 2013), and Hardt and Price (NIPS 2014). #R##N#As a corollary to our results, we get non-private algorithms that compute low-rank factorization in the turnstile update model with respect to the spectral norm. We note that, prior to this work, no algorithm that outputs low-rank factorization with respect to the spectral norm in the turnstile update model was known; i.e., our algorithm gives the first non-private low-rank factorization with respect to the spectral norm in the turnstile update mode.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)