human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "group server queues"
  Abstract: By analyzing energy-efficient management of data centers, this paper proposes and develops a class of interesting {\it Group-Server Queues}, and establishes two representative group-server queues through loss networks and impatient customers, respectively. Furthermore, such two group-server queues are given model descriptions and necessary interpretation. Also, simple mathematical discussion is provided, and simulations are made to study the expected queue lengths, the expected sojourn times and the expected virtual service times. In addition, this paper also shows that this class of group-server queues are often encountered in many other practical areas including communication networks, manufacturing systems, transportation networks, financial networks and healthcare systems. Note that the group-server queues are always used to design effectively dynamic control mechanisms through regrouping and recombining such many servers in a large-scale service system by means of, for example, bilateral threshold control, and customers transfer to the buffer or server groups. This leads to the large-scale service system that is divided into several adaptive and self-organizing subsystems through scheduling of batch customers and regrouping of service resources, which make the middle layer of this service system more effectively managed and strengthened under a dynamic, real-time and even reward optimal framework. Based on this, performance of such a large-scale service system may be improved greatly in terms of introducing and analyzing such group-server queues. Therefore, not only analysis of group-server queues is regarded as a new interesting research direction, but there also exists many theoretical challenges, basic difficulties and open problems in the area of queueing networks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "optimal asynchronous dynamic policies in energy efficient data centers"):
  with members:
    - "exact solutions for m m c setup queues"
    - "profit aware server allocation for green internet services"
    - "maximizing cloud providers revenues via energy aware allocation policies"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.PF(Performance)