human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "relations between greedy and bit optimal lz77 encodings"
  Abstract: This paper investigates the size in bits of the LZ77 encoding, which is the most popular and efficient variant of the Lempel-Ziv encodings used in data compression. We prove that, for a wide natural class of variable-length encoders for LZ77 phrases, the size of the greedily constructed LZ77 encoding on constant alphabets is within a factor $O(\frac{\log n}{\log\log\log n})$ of the optimal LZ77 encoding, where $n$ is the length of the processed string. We describe a series of examples showing that, surprisingly, this bound is tight, thus improving both the previously known upper and lower bounds. Further, we obtain a more detailed bound $O(\min\{z, \frac{\log n}{\log\log z}\})$, which uses the number $z$ of phrases in the greedy LZ77 encoding as a parameter, and construct a series of examples showing that this bound is tight even for binary alphabet. We then investigate the problem on non-constant alphabets: we show that the known $O(\log n)$ bound is tight even for alphabets of logarithmic size, and provide tight bounds for some other important cases.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "lempel ziv like parsing in small space"):
  with members:
    - "at the roots of dictionary compression string attractors"
    - "lz end parsing in compressed space"
    - "approximating lz77 via small space multiple pattern matching"
    - "from theory to practice plug and play with succinct data structures"
    - "lempel ziv parsing in external memory"
    - "linear time lempel ziv factorization simple fast small"
    - "relative lempel ziv factorization for efficient storage and retrieval of web collections"
    - "large alphabets and incompressibility"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "comparison of lz77 type parsings"):
  with members:
    - "at the roots of dictionary compression string attractors"
    - "optimal time text indexing in bwt runs bounded space"
    - "a separation between run length slps and lz77"
    - "on the size of lempel ziv and lyndon factorizations"
    - "approximation of grammar based compression via recompression"
    - "pattern matching in lempel ziv compressed strings fast simple and deterministic"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)