human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "algorithmic stability for adaptive data analysis"
  Abstract: Adaptivity is an important feature of data analysis---the choice of questions to ask about a dataset often depends on previous interactions with the same dataset. However, statistical validity is typically studied in a nonadaptive model, where all questions are specified before the dataset is drawn. Recent work by Dwork et al. (STOC, 2015) and Hardt and Ullman (FOCS, 2014) initiated the formal study of this problem, and gave the first upper and lower bounds on the achievable generalization error for adaptive data analysis. #R##N#Specifically, suppose there is an unknown distribution $\mathbf{P}$ and a set of $n$ independent samples $\mathbf{x}$ is drawn from $\mathbf{P}$. We seek an algorithm that, given $\mathbf{x}$ as input, accurately answers a sequence of adaptively chosen queries about the unknown distribution $\mathbf{P}$. How many samples $n$ must we draw from the distribution, as a function of the type of queries, the number of queries, and the desired level of accuracy? #R##N#In this work we make two new contributions: #R##N#(i) We give upper bounds on the number of samples $n$ that are needed to answer statistical queries. The bounds improve and simplify the work of Dwork et al. (STOC, 2015), and have been applied in subsequent work by those authors (Science, 2015, NIPS, 2015). #R##N#(ii) We prove the first upper bounds on the number of samples required to answer more general families of queries. These include arbitrary low-sensitivity queries and an important class of optimization queries. #R##N#As in Dwork et al., our algorithms are based on a connection with algorithmic stability in the form of differential privacy. We extend their work by giving a quantitatively optimal, more general, and simpler proof of their main theorem that stability implies low generalization error. We also study weaker stability guarantees such as bounded KL divergence and total variation distance.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information"):
  with members:
    - "robust generalization via α mutual information"
    - "in defense of uniform convergence generalization via derandomization with an application to interpolating predictors"
    - "strengthened information theoretic bounds on the generalization error"
    - "tightening mutual information based bounds on generalization error"
    - "high probability generalization bounds for uniformly stable algorithms with nearly optimal rate"
    - "a new analysis of differential privacy s generalization guarantees"
    - "pac learning with stable and private predictions"
    - "a direct sum result for the information complexity of learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "closure properties for private classification and online prediction"):
  with members:
    - "a new analysis of differential privacy s generalization guarantees"
    - "privately learning thresholds closing the exponential gap"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "private learning implies online learning an efficient reduction"
    - "private pac learning implies finite littlestone dimension"
    - "generalization for adaptively chosen estimators via stable median"
    - "online learning via differential privacy"
    - "differentially private release and learning of threshold functions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "efficient noise tolerant and private learning via boosting"):
  with members:
    - "a new analysis of differential privacy s generalization guarantees"
    - "concentrated differential privacy simplifications extensions and lower bounds"
    - "privately solving linear programs"
    - "differential privacy for the analyst via private equilibrium computation"
    - "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis"
    - "what can we learn privately"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "private identity testing for high dimensional distributions"):
  with members:
    - "lower bounds for testing graphical models colorings and antiferromagnetic ising models"
    - "efficiently estimating erdos renyi graphs with node differential privacy"
    - "improved differentially private analysis of variance"
    - "individual sensitivity preprocessing for data privacy"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"
    - "learning and testing causal models with interventions"
    - "privately learning high dimensional distributions"
    - "test without trust optimal locally private distribution testing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the power of synergy in differential privacy combining a small curator with local randomizers"):
  with members:
    - "locally private k means clustering"
    - "blender enabling local search with a hybrid differential privacy model"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy through communication complexity"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "differentially private algorithms for learning mixtures of separated gaussians"):
  with members:
    - "private hypothesis selection"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"
    - "privately learning high dimensional distributions"
    - "differentially private k means with constant multiplicative error"
    - "inspectre privately estimating the unseen"
    - "optimal schemes for discrete distribution estimation under locally differential privacy"
    - "finite sample differentially private confidence intervals"
    - "clustering algorithms for the centralized and local models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "private learning implies online learning an efficient reduction"):
  with members:
    - "passing tests without memorizing two models for fooling discriminators"
    - "efficient private algorithms for learning halfspaces"
    - "private pac learning implies finite littlestone dimension"
    - "learning in non convex games with an optimization oracle"
    - "how to use heuristics for differential privacy"
    - "calibrating noise to variance in adaptive data analysis"
    - "oracle efficient online learning and auction design"
    - "differentially private release and learning of threshold functions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "a new analysis of differential privacy s generalization guarantees"):
  with members:
    - "a necessary and sufficient stability notion for adaptive generalization"
    - "the advantages of multiple classes for reducing overfitting from test set reuse"
    - "guaranteed validity for empirical approaches to adaptive data analysis"
    - "mitigating bias in adaptive data gathering via differential privacy"
    - "generalization bounds for uniformly stable algorithms"
    - "generalization for adaptively chosen estimators via stable median"
    - "information theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithms"
    - "calibrating noise to variance in adaptive data analysis"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)