human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "rise of the rest the growing impact of non elite journals"
  Abstract: In this paper, we examine the evolution of the impact of non-elite journals. We attempt to answer two questions. First, what fraction of the top-cited articles are published in non-elite journals and how has this changed over time. Second, what fraction of the total citations are to non-elite journals and how has this changed over time. #R##N#We studied citations to articles published in 1995-2013. We computed the 10 most-cited journals and the 1000 most-cited articles each year for all 261 subject categories in Scholar Metrics. We marked the 10 most-cited journals in a category as the elite journals for the category and the rest as non-elite. #R##N#There are two conclusions from our study. First, the fraction of top-cited articles published in non-elite journals increased steadily over 1995-2013. While the elite journals still publish a substantial fraction of high-impact articles, many more authors of well-regarded papers in diverse research fields are choosing other venues. #R##N#The number of top-1000 papers published in non-elite journals for the representative subject category went from 149 in 1995 to 245 in 2013, a growth of 64%. Looking at broad research areas, 4 out of 9 areas saw at least one-third of the top-cited articles published in non-elite journals in 2013. For 6 out of 9 areas, the fraction of top-cited papers published in non-elite journals for the representative subject category grew by 45% or more. #R##N#Second, now that finding and reading relevant articles in non-elite journals is about as easy as finding and reading articles in elite journals, researchers are increasingly building on and citing work published everywhere. Considering citations to all articles, the percentage of citations to articles in non-elite journals went from 27% in 1995 to 47% in 2013. Six out of nine broad areas had at least 50% of citations going to articles published in non-elite journals in 2013.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "coverage of highly cited documents in google scholar web of science and scopus a multidisciplinary comparison"):
  with members:
    - "evidence of open access of scientific publications in google scholar a large scale analysis"
    - "google scholar as a data source for research assessment"
    - "can we use google scholar to identify highly cited documents"
    - "the accuracy of confidence intervals for field normalised indicators"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a two sided academic landscape portrait of highly cited documents in google scholar 1950 2013"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"
    - "methods for estimating the size of google scholar"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the journal impact factor a brief history critique and discussion of adverse effects"):
  with members:
    - "use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles need not be wrong"
    - "the weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers citations in the digital age"
    - "a further step forward in measuring journals scientific prestige the sjr2 indicator"
    - "some modifications to the snip journal impact indicator"
    - "measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the memory of science inflation myopia and the knowledge network"):
  with members:
    - "megajournal mismanagement manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at plos one"
    - "field normalization of scientometric indicators"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "on the shoulders of giants the growing impact of older articles"
    - "quantifying long term scientific impact"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)