human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a systematic approach to bound factor revealing lps and its application to the metric and squared metric facility location problems"
  Abstract: A systematic technique to bound factor-revealing linear programs is presented. We show how to derive a family of upper bound factor-revealing programs (UPFRP), and show that each such program can be solved by a computer to bound the approximation factor of an associated algorithm. Obtaining an UPFRP is straightforward, and can be used as an alternative to analytical proofs, that are usually very long and tedious. We apply this technique to the Metric Facility Location Problem (MFLP) and to a generalization where the distance function is a squared metric. We call this generalization the Squared Metric Facility Location Problem (SMFLP) and prove that there is no approximation factor better than 2.04, assuming P $\neq$ NP. Then, we analyze the best known algorithms for the MFLP based on primal-dual and LP-rounding techniques when they are applied to the SMFLP. We prove very tight bounds for these algorithms, and show that the LP-rounding algorithm achieves a ratio of 2.04, and therefore has the best factor for the SMFLP. We use UPFRPs in the dual-fitting analysis of the primal-dual algorithms for both the SMFLP and the MFLP, improving some of the previous analysis for the MFLP.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the factor revealing lp approach for facility location with penalties"):
  with members:
    - "an optimal bifactor approximation algorithm for the metric uncapacitated facility location problem"
    - "greedy facility location algorithms analyzed using dual fitting with factor revealing lp"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "an improved approximation for k median and positive correlation in budgeted optimization"):
  with members:
    - "tight algorithms for vertex cover with hard capacities on multigraphs and hypergraphs"
    - "pipage rounding pessimistic estimators and matrix concentration"
    - "approximating k median via pseudo approximation"
    - "when lp is the cure for your matching woes improved bounds for stochastic matchings"
    - "greedy facility location algorithms analyzed using dual fitting with factor revealing lp"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)