human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "diversity backpressure scheduling and routing with mutual information accumulation in wireless ad hoc networks"
  Abstract: We suggest and analyze algorithms for routing in multi-hop wireless ad-hoc networks that exploit mutual information accumulation as the physical layer transmission scheme, and are capable of routing multiple packet streams (commodities) when only the average channel state information is present and that only locally. The proposed algorithms are modifications of the Diversity Backpressure (DIVBAR) algorithm, under which the packet whose commodity has the largest "backpressure metric" is chosen to be transmitted and is forwarded through the link with the largest differential backlog (queue length). In contrast to traditional DIVBAR, each receiving node stores and accumulates the partially received packet in a separate "partial packet queue", thus increasing the probability of successful reception during a later possible retransmission. We present two variants of the algorithm: DIVBAR-RMIA, under which all the receiving nodes clear the received partial information of a packet once one or more receiving nodes firstly decode the packet; and DIVBAR-MIA, under which all the receiving nodes retain the partial information of a packet until the packet has reached its destination. We characterize the network capacity region with RMIA and prove that (under certain mild conditions) it is strictly larger than the network capacity region with the repetition (REP) transmission scheme that is used by the traditional DIVBAR. We also prove that DIVBAR-RMIA is throughput-optimum among the polices with RMIA, i.e., it achieves the network capacity region with RMIA, which in turn demonstrates that DIVBAR-RMIA outperforms traditional DIVBAR on the achievable throughput. Moreover, we prove that DIVBAR-MIA performs at least as well as DIVBAR-RMIA with respect to throughput. Simulations also confirm these results.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "optimal control of wireless computing networks"):
  with members:
    - "optimal dynamic cloud network control"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)