human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "microgrid revenue maximization by charging scheduling of evs in multiple parking stations"
  Abstract: Nowadays, there has been a rapid growth in global usage of the electronic vehicles (EV). Despite apparent environmental and economic advantages of EVs, their high demand charging jobs pose an immense challenge to the existing electricity grid infrastructure. In microgrids, as the small-scale version of traditional power grid, however, the EV charging scheduling is more challenging. This is because, the microgrid owner, as a large electricity customer, is interested in shaving its global peak demand, i.e., the aggregated demand over multiple parking stations, to reduce total electricity cost. While the EV charging scheduling problem in single station scenario has been studied extensively in the previous research, the microgrid-level problem with multiple stations subject to a global peak constraint is not tackled. This paper aims to propose a near-optimal EV charging scheduling mechanism in a microgrid governed by a single utility provider with multiple charging stations. The goal is to maximize the total revenue while respecting both local and global peak constraints. The underlying problem, however, is a NP-hard mixed integer linear problem which is difficult to tackle and calls for approximation algorithm design. We design a primaldual scheduling algorithm which runs in polynomial time and achieves bounded approximation ratio. Moreover, the proposed global scheduling algorithm applies a valley-filling strategy to further reduce the global peak. Simulation results show that the performance of the proposed algorithm is 98% of the optimum, which is much better than the theoretical bound obtained by our approximation analysis. Our algorithm reduces the peak demand obtained by the existing alternative algorithm by 16% and simultaneously achieves better resource utilization.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SY(Systems and Control)