human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "enabling robots to communicate their objectives"
  Abstract: The overarching goal of this work is to efficiently enable end-users to correctly anticipate a robot's behavior in novel situations. Since a robot's behavior is often a direct result of its underlying objective function, our insight is that end-users need to have an accurate mental model of this objective function in order to understand and predict what the robot will do. While people naturally develop such a mental model over time through observing the robot act, this familiarization process may be lengthy. Our approach reduces this time by having the robot model how people infer objectives from observed behavior, and then it selects those behaviors that are maximally informative. The problem of computing a posterior over objectives from observed behavior is known as Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), and has been applied to robots learning human objectives. We consider the problem where the roles of human and robot are swapped. Our main contribution is to recognize that unlike robots, humans will not be exact in their IRL inference. We thus introduce two factors to define candidate approximate-inference models for human learning in this setting, and analyze them in a user study in the autonomous driving domain. We show that certain approximate-inference models lead to the robot generating example behaviors that better enable users to anticipate what it will do in novel situations. Our results also suggest, however, that additional research is needed in modeling how humans extrapolate from examples of robot behavior.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bayes probe distribution guided sampling for prediction level sets"):
  with members:
    - "fooling lime and shap adversarial attacks on post hoc explanation methods"
    - "out of distribution detection in classifiers via generation"
    - "sim to real transfer of robotic control with dynamics randomization"
    - "pyro deep universal probabilistic programming"
    - "this looks like that deep learning for interpretable image recognition"
    - "sim to real learning agile locomotion for quadruped robots"
    - "certified adversarial robustness with additive noise"
    - "sanity checks for saliency maps"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "explainable agents through social cues a review"):
  with members:
    - "explainability in human agent systems"
    - "explainable artificial intelligence xai concepts taxonomies opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai"
    - "interactively shaping robot behaviour with unlabeled human instructions"
    - "expressing robot incapability"
    - "explicability legibility predictability transparency privacy security the emerging landscape of interpretable agent behavior"
    - "expressive robot motion timing"
    - "balancing explicability and explanation in human aware planning"
    - "plan explanations as model reconciliation moving beyond explanation as soliloquy"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "dave i can assure you that it s going to be all right a definition case for and survey of algorithmic assurances in human autonomy trust relationships"):
  with members:
    - "expressing robot incapability"
    - "uncertainty aware learning from demonstration using mixture density networks with sampling free variance modeling"
    - "towards better analysis of machine learning models a visual analytics perspective"
    - "what uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision"
    - "challenges for transparency"
    - "combating deep reinforcement learning s sisyphean curse with intrinsic fear"
    - "uncertainty aware reinforcement learning for collision avoidance"
    - "inverse reward design"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "building second order mental models for human robot interaction"):
  with members:
    - "on the utility of model learning in hri"
    - "bayes tomop a fast detection and best response algorithm towards sophisticated opponents"
    - "autonomous agents modelling other agents a comprehensive survey and open problems"
    - "modelling user s theory of ai s mind in interactive intelligent systems"
    - "machine theory of mind"
    - "where do you think you re going inferring beliefs about dynamics from behavior"
    - "towards efficient detection and optimal response against sophisticated opponents"
    - "sociosense robot navigation amongst pedestrians with social and psychological constraints"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "exploring computational user models for agent policy summarization"):
  with members:
    - "discovering blind spots in reinforcement learning"
    - "autonomous agents modelling other agents a comprehensive survey and open problems"
    - "establishing appropriate trust via critical states"
    - "machine teaching for inverse reinforcement learning algorithms and applications"
    - "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences"
    - "visualizing and understanding atari agents"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "enabling robots to infer how end users teach and learn through human robot interaction"):
  with members:
    - "an algorithmic perspective on imitation learning"
    - "human robot mutual adaptation in shared autonomy"
    - "machine teaching for bayesian learners in the exponential family"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "robots that take advantage of human trust"):
  with members:
    - "enabling robots to infer how end users teach and learn through human robot interaction"
    - "learning with opponent learning awareness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "robot capability and intention in trust based decisions across tasks"):
  with members:
    - "establishing appropriate trust via critical states"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.RO(Robotics)