human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "source normalized indicators of citation impact an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison"
  Abstract: Different scientific fields have different citation practices. Citation-based bibliometric indicators need to normalize for such differences between fields in order to allow for meaningful between-field comparisons of citation impact. Traditionally, normalization for field differences has usually been done based on a field classification system. In this approach, each publication belongs to one or more fields and the citation impact of a publication is calculated relative to the other publications in the same field. Recently, the idea of source normalization was introduced, which offers an alternative approach to normalize for field differences. In this approach, normalization is done by looking at the referencing behavior of citing publications or citing journals. In this paper, we provide an overview of a number of source normalization approaches and we empirically compare these approaches with a traditional normalization approach based on a field classification system. We also pay attention to the issue of the selection of the journals to be included in a normalization for field differences. Our analysis indicates a number of problems of the traditional classification-system-based normalization approach, suggesting that source normalization approaches may yield more accurate results.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators"):
  with members:
    - "which differences can be expected when two universities in the leiden ranking are compared some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations"
    - "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"
    - "revisiting relative indicators and provisional truths"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "how are excellent highly cited papers defined in bibliometrics a quantitative analysis of the literature"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "should citations be field normalized in evaluative bibliometrics an empirical analysis based on propensity score matching"):
  with members:
    - "the preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration"
    - "the geography of references in elite articles which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge"
    - "field normalization of scientometric indicators"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "validity of basing authors publication strategy on journal impact factors"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the convergent validity of several field normalized bibliometric indicators how well does i3 perform for impact measurement"):
  with members:
    - "on the calculation of percentile based bibliometric indicators"
    - "quantifying long term scientific impact"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators"):
  with members:
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "citation analysis with microsoft academic"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a comparison of university performance scores and ranks by mncs and fss"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "quality versus quantity in scientific impact"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"):
  with members:
    - "core elements in the process of citing publications conceptual overview of the literature"
    - "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "do altmetrics correlate with citations extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective"
    - "alternative metrics in scientometrics a meta analysis of research into three altmetrics"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "how well developed are altmetrics a cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications"
    - "the leiden ranking 2011 2012 data collection indicators and interpretation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations an empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting"):
  with members:
    - "granularity of algorithmically constructed publication level classifications of research publications identification of topics"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "on the causes of subject specific citation rates in web of science"
    - "the normalization of citation counts based on classification systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "granularity of algorithmically constructed publication level classifications of research publications identification of topics"):
  with members:
    - "a principled methodology for comparing relatedness measures for clustering publications"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "generating clustered journal maps an automated system for hierarchical classification"
    - "clustering scientific publications based on citation relations a systematic comparison of different methods"
    - "highly cited papers in library and information science lis authors institutions and network structures"
    - "a new methodology for constructing a publication level classification system of science"
    - "some modifications to the snip journal impact indicator"
    - "can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal journal citation relations using the journal citation reports"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "the number of linked references of publications in microsoft academic in comparison with the web of science"):
  with members:
    - "citation analysis with microsoft academic"
    - "the coverage of microsoft academic analyzing the publication output of a university"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "a new methodology for constructing a publication level classification system of science"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)