human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "density estimation in linear time"
  Abstract: We consider the problem of choosing a density estimate from a set of distributions F, minimizing the L1-distance to an unknown distribution (Devroye, Lugosi 2001). Devroye and Lugosi analyze two algorithms for the problem: Scheffe tournament winner and minimum distance estimate. The Scheffe tournament estimate requires fewer computations than the minimum distance estimate, but has strictly weaker guarantees than the latter. #R##N#We focus on the computational aspect of density estimation. We present two algorithms, both with the same guarantee as the minimum distance estimate. The first one, a modification of the minimum distance estimate, uses the same number (quadratic in |F|) of computations as the Scheffe tournament. The second one, called ``efficient minimum loss-weight estimate,'' uses only a linear number of computations, assuming that F is preprocessed. #R##N#We also give examples showing that the guarantees of the algorithms cannot be improved and explore randomized algorithms for density estimation.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection"):
  with members:
    - "private hypothesis selection"
    - "pan private uniformity testing"
    - "sorted top k in rounds"
    - "improved differentially private analysis of variance"
    - "locally private learning without interaction requires separation"
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy through communication complexity"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "private identity testing for high dimensional distributions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "private mean estimation of heavy tailed distributions"):
  with members:
    - "private hypothesis selection"
    - "the optimal approximation factor in density estimation"
    - "differentially private algorithms for learning mixtures of separated gaussians"
    - "privately learning high dimensional distributions"
    - "locally private gaussian estimation"
    - "inspectre privately estimating the unseen"
    - "being robust in high dimensions can be practical"
    - "differentially private testing of identity and closeness of discrete distributions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "private hypothesis selection"):
  with members:
    - "the optimal approximation factor in density estimation"
    - "differentially private algorithms for learning mixtures of separated gaussians"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"
    - "privately learning high dimensional distributions"
    - "locally private gaussian estimation"
    - "private pac learning implies finite littlestone dimension"
    - "learning sums of independent random variables with sparse collective support"
    - "inspectre privately estimating the unseen"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the optimal approximation factor in density estimation"):
  with members:
    - "fast and sample near optimal algorithms for learning multidimensional histograms"
    - "list decodable robust mean estimation and learning mixtures of spherical gaussians"
    - "sample efficient learning of mixtures"
    - "statistical query lower bounds for robust estimation of high dimensional gaussians and gaussian mixtures"
    - "algorithmic stability for adaptive data analysis"
    - "optimal learners for multiclass problems"
    - "near optimal density estimation in near linear time using variable width histograms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sample efficient learning of mixtures"):
  with members:
    - "statistical query lower bounds for robust estimation of high dimensional gaussians and gaussian mixtures"
    - "robust estimators in high dimensions without the computational intractability"
    - "sample optimal density estimation in nearly linear time"
    - "settling the polynomial learnability of mixtures of gaussians"
    - "polynomial learning of distribution families"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)