human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "generalising unit refutation completeness and slur via nested input resolution"
  Abstract: The class ${\mathcal{SLUR}}$ (Single Lookahead Unit Resolution) was introduced in Schlipf et al. (Inf Process Lett 54:133---137, 1995) as an umbrella class for efficient (poly-time) SAT solving, with linear-time SAT decision, while the recognition problem was not considered. Cepek et al. (2012) and Balyo et al. (2012) extended this class in various ways to hierarchies covering all of CNF (all clause-sets). We introduce a hierarchy ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k$ which we argue is the natural "limit" of such approaches. The second source for our investigations is the class ${\mathcal{UC}}$ of unit-refutation complete clause-sets, introduced in del Val (1994) as a target class for knowledge compilation. Via the theory of "hardness" of clause-sets as developed in Kullmann (1999), Kullmann (Ann Math Artif Intell 40(3---4):303---352, 2004) and Ansotegui et al. (2008) we obtain a natural generalisation ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ , containing those clause-sets which are "unit-refutation complete of level k", which is the same as having hardness at most k. Utilising the strong connections to (tree-)resolution complexity and (nested) input resolution, we develop basic methods for the determination of hardness (the level k in ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ ). A fundamental insight now is that ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k = {\mathcal{UC}}_k$ holds for all k. We can thus exploit both streams of intuitions and methods for the investigations of these hierarchies. As an application we can easily show that the hierarchies from Cepek et al. (2012) and Balyo et al. (2012) are strongly subsumed by ${\mathcal{SLUR}}_k$ . Finally we consider the problem of "irredundant" clause-sets in ${\mathcal{UC}}_k$ . For 2-CNF we show that strong minimisations are possible in polynomial time, while already for (very special) Horn clause-sets minimisation is NP-complete. We conclude with an extensive discussion of open problems and future directions. We envisage the concepts investigated here to be the starting point for a theory of good SAT translations, which brings together the good SAT-solving aspects from ${\mathcal{SLUR}}$ together with the knowledge-representation aspects from ${\mathcal{UC}}$ , and expands this combination via notions of "hardness".

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on sat representations of xor constraints"):
  with members:
    - "simulating parity reasoning extended version"
    - "trading inference effort versus size in cnf knowledge compilation"
    - "hardness measures and resolution lower bounds"
    - "towards a theory of good sat representations"
    - "unit contradiction versus unit propagation"
    - "extending clause learning sat solvers with complete parity reasoning extended version"
    - "circuit complexity and decompositions of global constraints"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards a theory of good sat representations"):
  with members:
    - "a framework for good sat translations with applications to cnf representations of xor constraints"
    - "on sat representations of xor constraints"
    - "trading inference effort versus size in cnf knowledge compilation"
    - "circuit complexity and decompositions of global constraints"
    - "a knowledge compilation map"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "trading inference effort versus size in cnf knowledge compilation"):
  with members:
    - "on sat representations of xor constraints"
    - "towards a theory of good sat representations"
    - "circuit complexity and decompositions of global constraints"
    - "a knowledge compilation map"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)