human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "conflict resolution in multiple access channels supporting simultaneous successful transmissions"
  Abstract: We consider the Conflict Resolution Problem in the context of a multiple-access system in which several stations can transmit their messages simultaneously to the channel. We assume that there are n stations and that at most k<= n stations are active at the same time, i.e, are willing to transmit a message. If in a certain instant at most d<=k active stations transmit to the channel then their messages are successfully transmitted, whereas if more than d active stations transmit simultaneously then their messages are lost. In this latter case we say that a conflict occurs. The present paper investigates non-adaptive conflict resolution algorithms working under the assumption that active stations receive a feedback from the channel that informs them on whether their messages have been successfully transmitted. If a station becomes aware that its message has been correctly sent over the channel then it becomes immediately inactive. The measure to optimize is the number of time slots needed to solve conflicts among all active stations. The fundamental question is whether this measure decreases linearly with the number d of messages that can be simultaneously transmitted with success. We give a positive answer to this question by providing a conflict resolution algorithm that uses a 1/d ratio of the number of time slots used by the optimal conflict resolution algorithm for the case d=1. Moreover, we derive a lower bound on the number of time slots needed to solve conflicts non-adaptively which is within a log (k/d) factor from the upper bound. To this aim, we introduce a new combinatorial structure that consists in a generalization of Komlos and Greenberg codes. Constructions of these new codes are obtained via a new generalization of selectors, whereas the non-existential result is implied by a non-existential result for a new generalization of the locally thin families.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)