human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "verifying concurrent stacks by divergence sensitive bisimulation"
  Abstract: The verification of linearizability -- a key correctness criterion for concurrent objects -- is based on trace refinement whose checking is PSPACE-complete. This paper suggests to use \emph{branching} bisimulation instead. Our approach is based on comparing an abstract specification in which object methods are executed atomically to a real object program. Exploiting divergence sensitivity, this also applies to progress properties such as lock-freedom. These results enable the use of \emph{polynomial-time} divergence-sensitive branching bisimulation checking techniques for verifying linearizability and progress. We conducted the experiment on concurrent lock-free stacks to validate the efficiency and effectiveness of our methods.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "pointer life cycle types for lock free data structures with memory reclamation"):
  with members:
    - "hyaline fast and transparent lock free memory reclamation"
    - "decoupling lock free data structures from memory reclamation for static analysis"
    - "safe deferred memory reclamation with types"
    - "reasoning about tso programs using reduction and abstraction"
    - "reclaiming memory for lock free data structures there has to be a better way"
    - "proving linearizability using forward simulations"
    - "effect summaries for thread modular analysis"
    - "concurrent data structures linked in time"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "decoupling lock free data structures from memory reclamation for static analysis"):
  with members:
    - "verification of tree based hierarchical read copy update in the linux kernel"
    - "reclaiming memory for lock free data structures there has to be a better way"
    - "proving linearizability using forward simulations"
    - "effect summaries for thread modular analysis"
    - "concurrent data structures linked in time"
    - "pointer race freedom"
    - "faster linearizability checking via p compositionality"
    - "verifying linearizability a comparative survey"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the effect race in fine grained concurrency"):
  with members:
    - "proving linearizability via branching bisimulation"
    - "an o m log n algorithm for stuttering equivalence and branching bisimulation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.PL(Programming Languages)