human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "checkpoint ensembles ensemble methods from a single training process"
  Abstract: We present the checkpoint ensembles method that can learn ensemble models on a single training process. Although checkpoint ensembles can be applied to any parametric iterative learning technique, here we focus on neural networks. Neural networks' composable and simple neurons make it possible to capture many individual and interaction effects among features. However, small sample sizes and sampling noise may result in patterns in the training data that are not representative of the true relationship between the features and the outcome. As a solution, regularization during training is often used (e.g. dropout). However, regularization is no panacea -- it does not perfectly address overfitting. Even with methods like dropout, two methodologies are commonly used in practice. First is to utilize a validation set independent to the training set as a way to decide when to stop training. Second is to use ensemble methods to further reduce overfitting and take advantage of local optima (i.e. averaging over the predictions of several models). In this paper, we explore checkpoint ensembles -- a simple technique that combines these two ideas in one training process. Checkpoint ensembles improve performance by averaging the predictions from "checkpoints" of the best models within single training process. We use three real-world data sets -- text, image, and electronic health record data -- using three prediction models: a vanilla neural network, a convolutional neural network, and a long short term memory network to show that checkpoint ensembles outperform existing methods: a method that selects a model by minimum validation score, and two methods that average models by weights. Our results also show that checkpoint ensembles capture a portion of the performance gains that traditional ensembles provide.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "auto annotation quality prediction for semi supervised learning with ensembles"):
  with members:
    - "encoder decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation"
    - "snapshot ensembles train 1 get m for free"
    - "data distillation towards omni supervised learning"
    - "mix and match tuning for self supervised semantic segmentation"
    - "a review on deep learning techniques applied to semantic segmentation"
    - "rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation"
    - "the cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding"
    - "temporal ensembling for semi supervised learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the best of both worlds combining recent advances in neural machine translation"):
  with members:
    - "sharp models on dull hardware fast and accurate neural machine translation decoding on the cpu"
    - "stronger baselines for trustable results in neural machine translation"
    - "revisiting distributed synchronous sgd"
    - "a decomposable attention model for natural language inference"
    - "language modeling with gated convolutional networks"
    - "the amu uedin submission to the wmt16 news translation task attention based nmt models as feature functions in phrase based smt"
    - "weight normalization a simple reparameterization to accelerate training of deep neural networks"
    - "google s neural machine translation system bridging the gap between human and machine translation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)