human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "national research assessment exercises a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings"
  Abstract: Development of bibliometric techniques has reached such a level as to suggest their integration or total substitution for classic peer review in the national research assessment exercises, as far as the hard sciences are concerned. In this work we compare rankings lists of universities captured by the first Italian evaluation exercise, through peer review, with the results of bibliometric simulations. The comparison shows the great differences between peer review and bibliometric rankings for excellence and productivity.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "peer review versus bibliometrics which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications"):
  with members:
    - "systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the uk ref"
    - "predicting publication long term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor"
    - "peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings a large scale analysis"
    - "do citations and readership identify seminal publications"
    - "revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement"
    - "selecting competent referees to assess research projects proposals a study of referees registers"
    - "do they agree bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the italian research assessment exercise"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement"):
  with members:
    - "predicting publication long term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor"
    - "core elements in the process of citing publications conceptual overview of the literature"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature"
    - "citations indicators of quality the impact fallacy"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "predicting the long term citation impact of recent publications"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on tit for tat franceschini and maisano versus anvur regarding the italian research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"):
  with members:
    - "do they agree bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the italian research assessment exercise"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "the vqr italy s second national research assessment methodological failures and ranking distortions"
    - "inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises"
    - "measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline"
    - "the importance of accounting for the number of co authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences"
    - "national peer review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money the italian case"
    - "research productivity are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "bibliometric evaluation of research performance where do we stand"):
  with members:
    - "measuring science irresistible temptations easy shortcuts and dangerous consequences"
    - "a sensitivity analysis of researchers productivity rankings to the time of citation observation"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises"
    - "individual research performance a proposal for comparing apples to oranges"
    - "what is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance"
    - "revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"):
  with members:
    - "identifying research fields within business and management a journal cross citation analysis"
    - "patents as instruments for exploring innovation dynamics geographic and technological perspectives on photovoltaic cells"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "a systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators"
    - "which percentile based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values an empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation rank approach p100"
    - "the revised snip indicator of elsevier s scopus"
    - "interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal journal citations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the vqr italy s second national research assessment methodological failures and ranking distortions"):
  with members:
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises"
    - "the importance of accounting for the number of co authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences"
    - "national peer review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money the italian case"
    - "revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment"
    - "a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large scale research assessments"
    - "the role of information asymmetry in the market for university industry research collaboration"
    - "evaluating research from informed peer review to bibliometrics"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "regression for citation data an evaluation of different methods"):
  with members:
    - "distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years"
    - "how well developed are altmetrics a cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications"
    - "national peer review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money the italian case"
    - "how to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences an empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects"
    - "comparison of a citation based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research group excellence"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"
    - "classification and powerlaws the logarithmic transformation"
    - "the first italian research assessment exercise a bibliometric perspective"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "national peer review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money the italian case"):
  with members:
    - "a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large scale research assessments"
    - "evaluating research from informed peer review to bibliometrics"
    - "the first italian research assessment exercise a bibliometric perspective"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)