human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the placement of the head that maximizes predictability an information theoretic approach"
  Abstract: The minimization of the length of syntactic dependencies is a well-established principle of word order and the basis of a mathematical theory of word order. Here we complete that theory from the perspective of information theory, adding a competing word order principle: the maximization of predictability of a target element. These two principles are in conflict: to maximize the predictability of the head, the head should appear last, which maximizes the costs with respect to dependency length minimization. The implications of such a broad theoretical framework to understand the optimality, diversity and evolution of the six possible orderings of subject, object and verb are reviewed.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "anti dependency distance minimization in short sequences a graph theoretic approach"):
  with members:
    - "towards a theory of word order comment on dependency distance a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural language by haitao liu et al"
    - "scarcity of crossing dependencies a direct outcome of a specific constraint"
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "liberating language research from dogmas of the 20th century"
    - "a commentary on the now or never bottleneck a fundamental constraint on language by christiansen and chater 2016"
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "random crossings in dependency trees"
    - "hubiness length crossings and their relationships in dependency trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards a theory of word order comment on dependency distance a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural language by haitao liu et al"):
  with members:
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "kauffman s adjacent possible in word order evolution"
    - "reply to the commentary be careful when assuming the obvious by p alday"
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "a stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependencies"
    - "the placement of the head that minimizes online memory a complex systems approach"
    - "why sov might be initially preferred and then lost or recovered a theoretical framework"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)