human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "portfolio driven resource management for transient cloud servers"
  Abstract: Cloud providers have begun to offer their surplus capacity in the form of low-cost transient servers, which can be revoked unilaterally at any time. While the low cost of transient servers makes them attractive for a wide range of applications, such as data processing and scientific computing, failures due to server revocation can severely degrade application performance. Since different transient server types offer different cost and availability tradeoffs, we present the notion of server portfolios that is based on financial portfolio modeling. Server portfolios enable construction of an "optimal" mix of severs to meet an application's sensitivity to cost and revocation risk. We implement model-driven portfolios in a system called ExoSphere, and show how diverse applications can use portfolios and application-specific policies to gracefully handle transient servers. We show that ExoSphere enables widely-used parallel applications such as Spark, MPI, and BOINC to be made transiency-aware with modest effort. Our experiments show that allowing the applications to use suitable transiency-aware policies, ExoSphere is able to achieve 80\% cost savings when compared to on-demand servers and greatly reduces revocation risk compared to existing approaches.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "speeding up deep learning with transient servers"):
  with members:
    - "demystifying parallel and distributed deep learning an in depth concurrency analysis"
    - "imagenet training in minutes"
    - "deep gradient compression reducing the communication bandwidth for distributed training"
    - "efficient processing of deep neural networks a tutorial and survey"
    - "extremely large minibatch sgd training resnet 50 on imagenet in 15 minutes"
    - "performance modeling and evaluation of distributed deep learning frameworks on gpus"
    - "revisiting distributed synchronous sgd"
    - "terngrad ternary gradients to reduce communication in distributed deep learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "cloudcoaster transient aware bursty datacenterworkload scheduling"):
  with members:
    - "speeding up deep learning with transient servers"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)