human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "preserving privacy enables coexistence equilibrium of competitive diffusion in social networks"
  Abstract: With the advent of social media, different companies often promote  competing  products simultaneously for word-of-mouth diffusion and adoption by users in social networks. For such scenarios of   competitive diffusion , prior studies show that the weaker product will soon become extinct (i.e., “winner takes all”). It is intriguing to observe that in practice, however, competing products, such as iPhone and Android phone, often coexist in the market. This discrepancy may result from many factors such as the phenomenon that a user in the real world may not spread its use of a product due to dissatisfaction of the product or privacy protection. In this paper, we incorporate users’ privacy for spreading behavior into competitive diffusion of two products and develop a problem formulation for  privacy-aware competitive diffusion . Then, we prove that privacy-preserving mechanisms can enable a “coexistence equilibrium” (i.e., two competing products coexist in the equilibrium) in competitive diffusion over social networks. In addition to the rigorous analysis, we also demonstrate our results with experiments over real network topologies.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "relations among different privacy notions"):
  with members:
    - "privacy loss in apple s implementation of differential privacy on macos 10 12"
    - "differentially private mixture of generative neural networks"
    - "composition properties of inferential privacy for time series data"
    - "adaptive laplace mechanism differential privacy preservation in deep learning"
    - "privtree a differentially private algorithm for hierarchical decompositions"
    - "pufferfish privacy mechanisms for correlated data"
    - "concentrated differential privacy simplifications extensions and lower bounds"
    - "concentrated differential privacy"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)