human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "cwts crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group s publication oeuvre"
  Abstract: The article "Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (`Leiden') evaluations of research performance", published by Tobias Opthof and Loet Leydesdorff (arXiv:1002.2769) deals with a subject as important as the application of so called field normalized indicators of citation impact in the assessment of research performance of individual researchers and research groups. Field normalization aims to account for differences in citation practices across scientific-scholarly subject fields. As the primary author of the papers presenting the "Leiden" indicators and of many reports and articles reporting on the outcomes of assessments actually using these measures, I comment on the 3 main issues addressed in the paper by Opthof and Leydesdorff.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators"):
  with members:
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "citation analysis with microsoft academic"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a comparison of university performance scores and ranks by mncs and fss"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "quality versus quantity in scientific impact"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena in scholarly networks the case of the strategic management journal"):
  with members:
    - "the scaling relationship between citation based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences"
    - "quantifying long term scientific impact"
    - "betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks"
    - "towards a new crown indicator an empirical analysis"
    - "experience versus talent shapes the structure of the web"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "evaluating journal quality a review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management"):
  with members:
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non experts the case of two snip versions"
    - "identifying research fields within business and management a journal cross citation analysis"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "aggregated journal journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks maps and interactive overlays"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "a systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"):
  with members:
    - "more precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons"
    - "ranking research institutions by the number of highly cited articles per scientist"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers productivity"
    - "national scale research performance assessment at the individual level"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"
    - "caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the cwts leiden evaluations of research performance"
    - "remaining problems with the new crown indicator mncs of the cwts"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "grand challenges in measuring and characterizing scholarly impact"):
  with members:
    - "universality of scholarly impact metrics"
    - "the structure of the arts humanities citation index a mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1 157 journals"
    - "measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals"
    - "a principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"):
  with members:
    - "a sensitivity analysis of researchers productivity rankings to the time of citation observation"
    - "the precision of the arithmetic mean geometric mean and percentiles for citation data an experimental simulation modelling approach"
    - "the journal coverage of web of science and scopus a comparative analysis"
    - "measuring academic influence not all citations are equal"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non experts the case of two snip versions"
    - "methods for estimating the size of google scholar"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"):
  with members:
    - "identifying research fields within business and management a journal cross citation analysis"
    - "patents as instruments for exploring innovation dynamics geographic and technological perspectives on photovoltaic cells"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics"
    - "a systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators"
    - "which percentile based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values an empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation rank approach p100"
    - "the revised snip indicator of elsevier s scopus"
    - "interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal journal citations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "throwing out the baby with the bathwater the undesirable effects of national research assessment exercises on research"):
  with members:
    - "source normalized indicators of citation impact an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison"
    - "evaluating research from informed peer review to bibliometrics"
    - "how journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research a comparison between innovation studies and business management"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"
    - "the source normalized impact per paper snip is a valid and sophisticated indicator of journal citation impact"
    - "remaining problems with the new crown indicator mncs of the cwts"
    - "measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)