human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "crossings as a side effect of dependency lengths"
  Abstract: The syntactic structure of sentences exhibits a striking regularity: dependencies tend to not cross when drawn above the sentence. We investigate two competing explanations. The traditional hypothesis is that this trend arises from an independent principle of syntax that reduces crossings practically to zero. An alternative to this view is the hypothesis that crossings are a side effect of dependency lengths, that is, sentences with shorter dependency lengths should tend to have fewer crossings. We are able to reject the traditional view in the majority of languages considered. The alternative hypothesis can lead to a more parsimonious theory of language.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "edge crossings in random linear arrangements"):
  with members:
    - "on the maximum crossing number"
    - "crossing patterns in nonplanar road networks"
    - "scarcity of crossing dependencies a direct outcome of a specific constraint"
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "liberating language research from dogmas of the 20th century"
    - "a stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependencies"
    - "random crossings in dependency trees"
    - "practical graph isomorphism ii"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on the relation between dependency distance crossing dependencies and parsing comment on dependency distance a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages by haitao liu et al"):
  with members:
    - "syntaxnet models for the conll 2017 shared task"
    - "scarcity of crossing dependencies a direct outcome of a specific constraint"
    - "globally normalized transition based neural networks"
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "simple and accurate dependency parsing using bidirectional lstm feature representations"
    - "transition based dependency parsing with stack long short term memory"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "scarcity of crossing dependencies a direct outcome of a specific constraint"):
  with members:
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "a stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependencies"
    - "random crossings in dependency trees"
    - "hubiness length crossings and their relationships in dependency trees"
    - "why sov might be initially preferred and then lost or recovered a theoretical framework"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "can chunking reduce syntactic complexity of natural languages"):
  with members:
    - "non crossing dependencies least effort not grammar"
    - "complexity measurement of natural and artificial languages"
    - "a stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependencies"
    - "menzerath altmann law for syntactic structures in ukrainian"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a commentary on the now or never bottleneck a fundamental constraint on language by christiansen and chater 2015"):
  with members:
    - "compression and the origins of zipf s law for word frequencies"
    - "compression and the origins of zipf s law of abbreviation"
    - "reply to the commentary be careful when assuming the obvious by p alday"
    - "the risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length"
    - "a stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependencies"
    - "the optimality of attaching unlinked labels to unlinked meanings"
    - "the placement of the head that minimizes online memory a complex systems approach"
    - "why sov might be initially preferred and then lost or recovered a theoretical framework"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "liberating language research from dogmas of the 20th century"):
  with members:
    - "scarcity of crossing dependencies a direct outcome of a specific constraint"
    - "dependency length minimization puzzles and promises"
    - "reply to the commentary be careful when assuming the obvious by p alday"
    - "the placement of the head that minimizes online memory a complex systems approach"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)