human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a generalized performance evaluation framework for parallel systems with output synchronization"
  Abstract: Frameworks, such as MapReduce and Hadoop are abundant nowadays. They seek to reap benefits of parallelization, albeit subject to a synchronization constraint at the output. Fork-Join (FJ) queuing models are used to analyze such systems. Arriving jobs are split into tasks each of which is mapped to exactly one server. A job leaves the system when all of its tasks are executed. #R##N#As a metric of performance, we consider waiting times for both work-conserving and non-work conserving server systems under a mathematical set-up general enough to take into account possible phase-type behavior of the servers, and as suggested by recent evidences, bursty arrivals. #R##N#To this end, we present a Markov-additive process framework for an FJ system and provide computable bounds on tail probabilities of steady-state waiting times, for both types of servers separately. We apply our results to three scenarios, namely, non-renewal (Markov-modulated) arrivals, servers showing phase-type behavior, and Markov-modulated arrivals and services. We compare our bounds against estimates obtained through simulations and also provide a theoretical conceptualization of provisions in FJ systems. Finally, we calibrate our model with real data traces, and illustrate how our bounds can be used to devise provisions.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "collaborative uploading in heterogeneous networks optimal and adaptive strategies"):
  with members:
    - "delay comparison of delivery and coding policies in data clusters"
    - "optimizing stochastic scheduling in fork join queueing models bounds and applications"
    - "efficient redundancy techniques for latency reduction in cloud systems"
    - "non asymptotic delay bounds for k l fork join systems and multi stage fork join networks"
    - "projection onto the probability simplex an efficient algorithm with a simple proof and an application"
    - "on the flow level delay of a spatial multiplexing mimo wireless channel"
    - "online convex optimization in the bandit setting gradient descent without a gradient"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.PF(Performance)