human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a stratified analysis of bayesian optimization methods"
  Abstract: Empirical analysis serves as an important complement to theoretical analysis for studying practical Bayesian optimization. Often empirical insights expose strengths and weaknesses inaccessible to theoretical analysis. We define two metrics for comparing the performance of Bayesian optimization methods and propose a ranking mechanism for summarizing performance within various genres or strata of test functions. These test functions serve to mimic the complexity of hyperparameter optimization problems, the most prominent application of Bayesian optimization, but with a closed form which allows for rapid evaluation and more predictable behavior. This offers a flexible and efficient way to investigate functions with specific properties of interest, such as oscillatory behavior or an optimum on the domain boundary.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies"):
  with members:
    - "on empirical comparisons of optimizers for deep learning"
    - "leveraging procedural generation to benchmark reinforcement learning"
    - "stochastic gradient methods with layer wise adaptive moments for training of deep networks"
    - "on the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond"
    - "the visual task adaptation benchmark"
    - "using learned optimizers to make models robust to input noise"
    - "deepobs a deep learning optimizer benchmark suite"
    - "nas bench 101 towards reproducible neural architecture search"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "efficient hyperparameter optimization and infinitely many armed bandits"):
  with members:
    - "fast bayesian optimization of machine learning hyperparameters on large datasets"
    - "thoughts on massively scalable gaussian processes"
    - "least squares revisited scalable approaches for multi class prediction"
    - "auto weka combined selection and hyperparameter optimization of classification algorithms"
    - "sharp analysis of low rank kernel matrix approximations"
    - "fast cross validation via sequential testing"
    - "information theoretic regret bounds for gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting"
    - "regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi armed bandit problems"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)