human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "sublinear time algorithms for counting star subgraphs with applications to join selectivity estimation"
  Abstract: We study the problem of estimating the value of sums of the form $S_p \triangleq \sum \binom{x_i}{p}$ when one has the ability to sample $x_i \geq 0$ with probability proportional to its magnitude. When $p=2$, this problem is equivalent to estimating the selectivity of a self-join query in database systems when one can sample rows randomly. We also study the special case when $\{x_i\}$ is the degree sequence of a graph, which corresponds to counting the number of $p$-stars in a graph when one has the ability to sample edges randomly. #R##N#Our algorithm for a $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$-multiplicative approximation of $S_p$ has query and time complexities $\O(\frac{m \log \log n}{\epsilon^2 S_p^{1/p}})$. Here, $m=\sum x_i/2$ is the number of edges in the graph, or equivalently, half the number of records in the database table. Similarly, $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph and the number of unique values in the database table. We also provide tight lower bounds (up to polylogarithmic factors) in almost all cases, even when $\{x_i\}$ is a degree sequence and one is allowed to use the structure of the graph to try to get a better estimate. We are not aware of any prior lower bounds on the problem of join selectivity estimation. #R##N#For the graph problem, prior work which assumed the ability to sample only \emph{vertices} uniformly gave algorithms with matching lower bounds [Gonen, Ron, and Shavitt. \textit{SIAM J. Comput.}, 25 (2011), pp. 1365-1411]. With the ability to sample edges randomly, we show that one can achieve faster algorithms for approximating the number of star subgraphs, bypassing the lower bounds in this prior work. For example, in the regime where $S_p\leq n$, and $p=2$, our upper bound is $\tilde{O}(n/S_p^{1/2})$, in contrast to their $\Omega(n/S_p^{1/3})$ lower bound when no random edge queries are available.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "nearly optimal edge estimation with independent set queries"):
  with members:
    - "a simple sublinear time algorithm for counting arbitrary subgraphs via edge sampling"
    - "fiding forbidden minors in sublinear time a o n 1 2 o 1 query one sided tester for minor closed properties on bounded degree graphs"
    - "edge estimation with independent set oracles"
    - "on approximating the number of k cliques in sublinear time"
    - "on sampling edges almost uniformly"
    - "approximately counting triangles in sublinear time"
    - "the power of an example hidden set size approximation using group queries and conditional sampling"
    - "a near optimal sublinear time algorithm for approximating the minimum vertex cover size"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sublinear time estimation of degree distribution moments the arboricity connection"):
  with members:
    - "algorithmic complexity of power law networks"
    - "approximately counting triangles in sublinear time"
    - "catching the head tail and everything in between a streaming algorithm for the degree distribution"
    - "why do simple algorithms for triangle enumeration work in the real world"
    - "a near optimal sublinear time algorithm for approximating the minimum vertex cover size"
    - "listing all maximal cliques in sparse graphs in near optimal time"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)