human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "approximate computation and implicit regularization for very large scale data analysis"
  Abstract: Database theory and database practice are typically the domain of computer scientists who adopt what may be termed an algorithmic perspective on their data. This perspective is very different than the more statistical perspective adopted by statisticians, scientific computers, machine learners, and other who work on what may be broadly termed statistical data analysis. In this article, I will address fundamental aspects of this algorithmic-statistical disconnect, with an eye to bridging the gap between these two very different approaches. A concept that lies at the heart of this disconnect is that of statistical regularization, a notion that has to do with how robust is the output of an algorithm to the noise properties of the input data. Although it is nearly completely absent from computer science, which historically has taken the input data as given and modeled algorithms discretely, regularization in one form or another is central to nearly every application domain that applies algorithms to noisy data. By using several case studies, I will illustrate, both theoretically and empirically, the nonobvious fact that approximate computation, in and of itself, can implicitly lead to statistical regularization. This and other recent work suggests that, by exploiting in a more principled way the statistical properties implicit in worst-case algorithms, one can in many cases satisfy the bicriteria of having algorithms that are scalable to very large-scale databases and that also have good inferential or predictive properties.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "implicit regularization of normalization methods"):
  with members:
    - "over parameterization as a catalyst for better generalization of deep relu network"
    - "traditional and heavy tailed self regularization in neural network models"
    - "two models of double descent for weak features"
    - "a quantitative analysis of the effect of batch normalization on gradient descent"
    - "implicit regularization in deep matrix factorization"
    - "theoretical issues in deep networks approximation optimization and generalization"
    - "luck matters understanding training dynamics of deep relu networks"
    - "implicit self regularization in deep neural networks evidence from random matrix theory and implications for learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "rethinking generalization requires revisiting old ideas statistical mechanics approaches and complex learning behavior"):
  with members:
    - "traditional and heavy tailed self regularization in neural network models"
    - "heavy tailed universality predicts trends in test accuracies for very large pre trained deep neural networks"
    - "deep learning is robust to massive label noise"
    - "implicit self regularization in deep neural networks evidence from random matrix theory and implications for learning"
    - "theory iiib generalization in deep networks"
    - "a surprising linear relationship predicts test performance in deep networks"
    - "on the computational inefficiency of large batch sizes for stochastic gradient descent"
    - "measuring the effects of data parallelism on neural network training"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "self paced learning an implicit regularization perspective"):
  with members:
    - "what objective does self paced learning indeed optimize"
    - "a survey on multi view learning"
    - "implementing regularization implicitly via approximate eigenvector computation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a local spectral method for graphs with applications to improving graph partitions and exploring data graphs locally"):
  with members:
    - "empirical comparison of algorithms for network community detection"
    - "implementing regularization implicitly via approximate eigenvector computation"
    - "community structure in large networks natural cluster sizes and the absence of large well defined clusters"
    - "nearly linear time algorithms for graph partitioning graph sparsification and solving linear systems"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)