human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "measuring fairness in ranked outputs"
  Abstract: Ranking and scoring are ubiquitous. We consider the setting in which an institution, called a ranker, evaluates a set of individuals based on demographic, behavioral or other characteristics. The final output is a ranking that represents the relative quality of the individuals. While automatic and therefore seemingly objective, rankers can, and often do, discriminate against individuals and systematically disadvantage members of protected groups. This warrants a careful study of the fairness of a ranking scheme. #R##N#In this paper we propose fairness measures for ranked outputs. We develop a data generation procedure that allows us to systematically control the degree of unfairness in the output, and study the behavior of our measures on these datasets. We then apply our proposed measures to several real datasets, and demonstrate cases of unfairness. Finally, we show preliminary results of incorporating our ranked fairness measures into an optimization framework, and show potential for improving fairness of ranked outputs while maintaining accuracy.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fair correlation clustering"):
  with members:
    - "coresets for clustering with fairness constraints"
    - "summarizing user generated textual content motivation and methods for fairness in algorithmic summaries"
    - "improved algorithms for correlation clustering with local objectives"
    - "near neighbor who is the fairest of them all"
    - "correlation clustering with adaptive similarity queries"
    - "fair algorithms for clustering"
    - "scalable fair clustering"
    - "achieving fairness in determining medicaid eligibility through fairgroup construction"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "pots protective optimization technologies"):
  with members:
    - "discrimination through optimization how facebook s ad delivery can lead to biased outcomes"
    - "adversarial attacks on copyright detection systems"
    - "explaining explanations in ai"
    - "delayed impact of fair machine learning"
    - "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning"
    - "poisoning attacks to graph based recommender systems"
    - "the measure and mismeasure of fairness a critical review of fair machine learning"
    - "fighting offensive language on social media with unsupervised text style transfer"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fairsight visual analytics for fairness in decision making"):
  with members:
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "manifold a model agnostic framework for interpretation and diagnosis of machine learning models"
    - "a nutritional label for rankings"
    - "using image fairness representations in diversity based re ranking for recommendations"
    - "rulematrix visualizing and understanding classifiers with rules"
    - "equity of attention amortizing individual fairness in rankings"
    - "fairness of exposure in rankings"
    - "fa ir a fair top k ranking algorithm"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "diversity and inclusion metrics for subset selection"):
  with members:
    - "assessing and remedying coverage for a given dataset"
    - "the price of fair pca one extra dimension"
    - "ranking with fairness constraints"
    - "monte carlo markov chain algorithms for sampling strongly rayleigh distributions and determinantal point processes"
    - "how to be fair and diverse"
    - "learning mixtures of submodular shells with application to document summarization"
    - "fairness through awareness"
    - "solving the apparent diversity accuracy dilemma of recommender systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "interventions for ranking in the presence of implicit bias"):
  with members:
    - "fairness aware ranking in search recommendation systems with application to linkedin talent search"
    - "coresets for clustering with fairness constraints"
    - "toward controlling discrimination in online ad auctions"
    - "pairwise fairness for ranking and regression"
    - "fair and diverse dpp based data summarization"
    - "classification with fairness constraints a meta algorithm with provable guarantees"
    - "fairness of exposure in rankings"
    - "multiwinner voting with fairness constraints"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "fair algorithms for clustering"):
  with members:
    - "tight fpt approximations for k median and k means"
    - "scalable fair clustering"
    - "on the cost of essentially fair clusterings"
    - "privacy preserving clustering with constraints"
    - "constant factor fpt approximation for capacitated k median"
    - "a unified framework for clustering constrained data without locality property"
    - "fair clustering through fairlets"
    - "generalized center problems with outliers"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "fair learning to rank from implicit feedback"):
  with members:
    - "fairness aware ranking in search recommendation systems with application to linkedin talent search"
    - "achieving fairness in the stochastic multi armed bandit problem"
    - "fair logistic regression an adversarial perspective"
    - "the few get richer a surprising consequence of popularity based rankings"
    - "intervention harvesting for context dependent examination bias estimation"
    - "fairness in recommendation ranking through pairwise comparisons"
    - "estimating position bias without intrusive interventions"
    - "policy learning for fairness in ranking"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "stable and fair classification"):
  with members:
    - "toward controlling discrimination in online ad auctions"
    - "fair and diverse dpp based data summarization"
    - "ai fairness 360 an extensible toolkit for detecting understanding and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias"
    - "generalization bounds for uniformly stable algorithms"
    - "classification with fairness constraints a meta algorithm with provable guarantees"
    - "a reductions approach to fair classification"
    - "on fairness and calibration"
    - "certified defenses for data poisoning attacks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)