human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "building a fault tolerant application using the gaspi communication layer"
  Abstract: It is commonly agreed that highly parallel software on Exascale computers will suffer from many more runtime failures due to the decreasing trend in the mean time to failures (MTTF). Therefore, it is not surprising that a lot of research is going on in the area of fault tolerance and fault mitigation. Applications should survive a failure and/or be able to recover with minimal cost. MPI is not yet very mature in handling failures, the User-Level Failure Mitigation (ULFM) proposal being currently the most promising approach is still in its prototype phase. In our work we use GASPI, which is a relatively new communication library based on the PGAS model. It provides the missing features to allow the design of fault-tolerant applications. Instead of introducing algorithm-based fault tolerance in its true sense, we demonstrate how we can build on (existing) clever checkpointing and extend applications to allow integrate a low cost fault detection mechanism and, if necessary, recover the application on the fly. The aspects of process management, the restoration of groups and the recovery mechanism is presented in detail. We use a sparse matrix vector multiplication based application to perform the analysis of the overhead introduced by such modifications. Our fault detection mechanism causes no overhead in failure-free cases, whereas in case of failure(s), the failure detection and recovery cost is of reasonably acceptable order and shows good scalability.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "performance evaluation of an algorithm based asynchronous checkpoint restart fault tolerant application using mixed mpi gpi 2"):
  with members:
    - "matrix factorization at scale a comparison of scientific data analytics in spark and c mpi using three case studies"
    - "a tale of two data intensive paradigms applications abstractions and architectures"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)