human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "strategically knowing how"
  Abstract: In this paper, we propose a single-agent logic of goal-directed knowing how extending the standard epistemic logic of knowing that with a new knowing how operator. The semantics of the new operator is based on the idea that knowing how to achieve $\phi$ means that there exists a (uniform) strategy such that the agent knows that it can make sure $\phi$. We give an intuitive axiomatization of our logic and prove the soundness, completeness, and decidability of the logic. The crucial axioms relating knowing that and knowing how illustrate our understanding of knowing how in this setting. This logic can be used in representing both knowledge-that and knowledge-how.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "intelligence in strategic games"):
  with members:
    - "strategy logic with imperfect information"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"
    - "a logic of knowing how"
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"
    - "reasoning about strategies on the model checking problem"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "duty to warn in strategic games"):
  with members:
    - "blameworthiness in strategic games"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "blameworthiness in games with imperfect information"):
  with members:
    - "towards formal definitions of blameworthiness intention and moral responsibility"
    - "blameworthiness in strategic games"
    - "coalition and group announcement logic"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"
    - "a logic of knowing how"
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "knowledge and blameworthiness"):
  with members:
    - "blameworthiness in strategic games"
    - "coalition and group announcement logic"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"
    - "a logic of knowing how"
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "blameworthiness in strategic games"):
  with members:
    - "coalition and group announcement logic"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "weakly aggregative modal logic characterization and interpolation new version"):
  with members:
    - "knowing value logic as a normal modal logic"
    - "neighbourhood structures bisimilarity and basic model theory"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a new modal framework for epistemic logic"):
  with members:
    - "beyond knowing that a new generation of epistemic logics"
    - "knowing values and public inspection"
    - "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"
    - "knowing value logic as a normal modal logic"
    - "achieving while maintaining a logic of knowing how with intermediate constraints"
    - "a logic of knowing how"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how"):
  with members:
    - "decidability results for atl with imperfect information and perfect recall"
    - "strategy logic with imperfect information"
    - "strategic coalitions with perfect recall"
    - "resolving distributed knowledge"
    - "a logic of knowing how"
    - "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)