human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "analysing viewpoints in design through the argumentation process"
  Abstract: We present an empirical study aimed at analysing the use of viewpoints in an industrial Concurrent Engineering context. Our focus is on the viewpoints expressed in the argumentative process taking place in evaluation meetings. Our results show that arguments enabling a viewpoint or proposal to be defended are often characterized by the use of constraints. Firstly, we show that, even if some constraints are apparently identically used by the different specialists involved in meetings, various meanings and weightings are associated with these constraints by these different specialists. Secondly, we show that the implicit or explicit nature of constraints depends on several interlocutive factors. Thirdly, we show that an argument often covers not only one constraint but a network of constraints. The type of combination reflects viewpoints which have specific status in the meeting. Then, we will propose a first model of the dynamics of viewpoints confrontation/integration.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "design one but in different forms"):
  with members:
    - "designing as construction of representations a dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research"
    - "changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology a study of software technical review meetings"
    - "reuse of designs desperately seeking an interdisciplinary cognitive approach"
    - "mental representations constructed by experts and novices in object oriented program comprehension"
    - "evocation and elaboration of solutions different types of problem solving actions an empirical study on the design of an aerospace artifact"
    - "both generic design and different forms of designing"
    - "dynamic aspects of individual design activities a cognitive ergonomics viewpoint"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "designing as construction of representations a dynamic viewpoint in cognitive design research"):
  with members:
    - "negotiation in collaborative assessment of design solutions an empirical study on a concurrent engineering process"
    - "an empirical study of software reuse by experts in object oriented design"
    - "changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology a study of software technical review meetings"
    - "reuse of designs desperately seeking an interdisciplinary cognitive approach"
    - "cognitive effort in collective software design methodological perspectives in cognitive ergonomics"
    - "evocation and elaboration of solutions different types of problem solving actions an empirical study on the design of an aerospace artifact"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "collaborative design managing task interdependencies and multiple perspectives"):
  with members:
    - "a methodological framework for socio cognitive analyses of collaborative design of open source software"
    - "negotiation in collaborative assessment of design solutions an empirical study on a concurrent engineering process"
    - "changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology a study of software technical review meetings"
    - "quantitative measurements of the influence of participant roles during peer review meetings"
    - "viewpoints in co design a field study in concurrent engineering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "memory of past designs distinctive roles in individual and collective design"):
  with members:
    - "negotiation in collaborative assessment of design solutions an empirical study on a concurrent engineering process"
    - "reasoning from a schema and from an analog in software code reuse"
    - "an empirical study of software reuse by experts in object oriented design"
    - "reusing processes and documenting processes toward an integrated framework"
    - "reuse of designs desperately seeking an interdisciplinary cognitive approach"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.OH(Other Computer Science)