human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "estimation of miner hash rates and consensus on blockchains draft"
  Abstract: We make several contributions that quantify the real-time hash rate and therefore the consensus of a blockchain. We show that by using only the hash value of blocks, we can estimate and measure the hash rate of all miners or individual miners, with quanti able accuracy. We apply our techniques to the Ethereum and Bitcoin blockchains; our solution applies to any proof-of-work-based blockchain that relies on a numeric target for the validation of blocks. We also show that if miners regularly broadcast status reports of their partial proof-of- work, the hash rate estimates are signi cantly more accurate at a cost of slightly higher bandwidth. Whether using only the blockchain, or the additional information in status reports, merchants can use our techniques to quantify in real-time the threat of double-spend attacks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a deep dive into bitcoin mining pools an empirical analysis of mining shares"):
  with members:
    - "decentralization in bitcoin and ethereum networks"
    - "bitcoin s security model revisited"
    - "the unreasonable effectiveness of address clustering"
    - "optimal selfish mining strategies in bitcoin"
    - "analysis of hashrate based double spending"
    - "on subversive miner strategies and block withholding attack in bitcoin digital currency"
    - "the miner s dilemma"
    - "majority is not enough bitcoin mining is vulnerable"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "bonded mining difficulty adjustment by miner commitment"):
  with members:
    - "bitcoin vs bitcoin cash coexistence or downfall of bitcoin cash"
    - "bobtail a proof of work target that minimizes blockchain mining variance draft"
    - "enhancing bitcoin security and performance with strong consistency via collective signing"
    - "bitcoin meets strong consistency"
    - "cryptocurrencies without proof of work"
    - "majority is not enough bitcoin mining is vulnerable"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)