human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on context tree prediction of individual sequences"
  Abstract: Motivated by the evident success of context-tree based methods in lossless data compression, we explore, in this paper, methods of the same spirit in universal prediction of individual sequences. By context-tree prediction, we refer to a family of prediction schemes, where at each time instant $t$, after having observed all outcomes of the data sequence $x_1,...,x_{t-1}$, but not yet $x_t$, the prediction is based on a ``context'' (or a state) that consists of the $k$ most recent past outcomes $x_{t-k},...,x_{t-1}$, where the choice of $k$ may depend on the contents of a possibly longer, though limited, portion of the observed past, $x_{t-k_{\max}},...x_{t-1}$. This is different from the study reported in [1], where general finite-state predictors as well as ``Markov'' (finite-memory) predictors of fixed order, were studied in the regime of individual sequences. #R##N#Another important difference between this study and [1] is the asymptotic regime. While in [1], the resources of the predictor (i.e., the number of states or the memory size) were kept fixed regardless of the length $N$ of the data sequence, here we investigate situations where the number of contexts or states is allowed to grow concurrently with $N$. We are primarily interested in the following fundamental question: What is the critical growth rate of the number of contexts, below which the performance of the best context-tree predictor is still universally achievable, but above which it is not? We show that this critical growth rate is linear in $N$. In particular, we propose a universal context-tree algorithm that essentially achieves optimum performance as long as the growth rate is sublinear, and show that, on the other hand, this is impossible in the linear case.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "perfectly secure encryption of individual sequences"):
  with members:
    - "universal communication part i modulo additive channels"
    - "efficient on line schemes for encoding individual sequences with side information at the decoder"
    - "on the wyner ziv problem for individual sequences"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a note on the compaction of long training sequences for universal classification a non probabilistic approach"):
  with members:
    - "on finite memory universal data compression and classification of individual sequences"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)