human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on using tracer driver for external dynamic process observation"
  Abstract: One is interested here in the observation of dynamic processes starting from the traces which they leave or those that one makes them produce. It is considered here that it should be possible to make several observations simultaneously, using a large variety of independently developed analyzers. For this purpose, we introduce the original notion of ``full trace'' to capture the idea that a process can be instrumented in such a way that it may broadcast all information which could ever be requested by any kind of observer. Each analyzer can then find in the full trace the data elements which it needs. This approach uses what has been called a "tracer driver" which completes the tracer and drives it to answer the requests of the analyzers. A tracer driver allows to restrict the flow of information and makes this approach tractable. On the other side, the potential size of a full trace seems to make the idea of full trace unrealistic. In this work we explore the consequences of this notion in term of potential efficiency, by analyzing the respective workloads between the (full) tracer and many different analyzers, all being likely run in true parallel environments. To illustrate this study, we use the example of the observation of the resolution of constraints systems (proof-tree, search-tree and propagation) using sophisticated visualization tools, as developed in the project OADymPPaC (2001-2004). The processes considered here are computer programs, but we believe the approach can be extended to many other kinds of processes.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards a generic framework to generate explanatory traces of constraint solving and rule based reasoning"):
  with members:
    - "observational semantics of the prolog resolution box model"
    - "model driven development of complex software a research roadmap"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "observational semantics of the prolog resolution box model"):
  with members:
    - "pure prolog execution in 21 rules"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "une semantique observationnelle du modele des boites pour la resolution de programmes logiques version etendue"):
  with members:
    - "pure prolog execution in 21 rules"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.PL(Programming Languages)