human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "practical fault tolerant data aggregation"
  Abstract: During Financial Cryptography 2012 Chan et al. presented a novel privacy-protection fault-tolerant data aggregation protocol. Comparing to previous work, their scheme guaranteed provable privacy of individuals and could work even if some number of users refused to participate. In our paper we demonstrate that despite its merits, their method provides unacceptably low accuracy of aggregated data for a wide range of assumed parameters and cannot be used in majority of real-life systems. To show this we use both precise analytic and experimental methods. Additionally, we present a precise data aggregation protocol that provides provable level of security even facing massive failures of nodes. Moreover, the protocol requires significantly less computation (limited exploiting of heavy cryptography) than most of currently known fault tolerant aggregation protocols and offers better security guarantees that make it suitable for systems of limited resources (including sensor networks). To obtain our result we relax however the model and allow some limited communication between the nodes.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "how to cooperate locally to improve global privacy in social networks on amplification of privacy preserving data aggregation"):
  with members:
    - "enhancing the robustness of scale free networks"
    - "community structure in large networks natural cluster sizes and the absence of large well defined clusters"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards extending noiseless privacy dependent data and more practical approach"):
  with members:
    - "what s the gist privacy preserving aggregation of user profiles"
    - "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis"
    - "on sampling anonymization and differential privacy or k anonymization meets differential privacy"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)