human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "cost effective conceptual design using taxonomies"
  Abstract: It is known that annotating named entities in unstructured and semi-structured data sets by their concepts improves the effectiveness of answering queries over these data sets. As every enterprise has a limited budget of time or computational resources, it has to annotate a subset of concepts in a given domain whose costs of annotation do not exceed the budget. We call such a subset of concepts a {\it conceptual design} for the annotated data set. We focus on finding a conceptual design that provides the most effective answers to queries over the annotated data set, i.e., a {\it cost-effective conceptual design}. Since, it is often less time-consuming and costly to annotate general concepts than specific concepts, we use information on superclass/subclass relationships between concepts in taxonomies to find a cost-effective conceptual design. We quantify the amount by which a conceptual design with concepts from a taxonomy improves the effectiveness of answering queries over an annotated data set. If the taxonomy is a tree, we prove that the problem is NP-hard and propose an efficient approximation and pseudo-polynomial time algorithms for the problem. We further prove that if the taxonomy is a directed acyclic graph, given some generally accepted hypothesis, it is not possible to find any approximation algorithm with reasonably small approximation ratio for the problem. Our empirical study using real-world data sets, taxonomies, and query workloads shows that our framework effectively quantifies the amount by which a conceptual design improves the effectiveness of answering queries. It also indicates that our algorithms are efficient for a design-time task with pseudo-polynomial algorithm being generally more effective than the approximation algorithm.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)