human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "security privacy and safety evaluation of dynamic and static fleets of drones"
  Abstract: Inter-connected objects, either via public or private networks are the near future of modern societies. Such inter-connected objects are referred to as Internet-of-Things (IoT) and/or Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). One example of such a system is based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The fleet of such vehicles are prophesied to take on multiple roles involving mundane to high-sensitive, such as, prompt pizza or shopping deliveries to your homes to battlefield deployment for reconnaissance and combat missions. Drones, as we refer to UAVs in this paper, either can operate individually (solo missions) or part of a fleet (group missions), with and without constant connection with the base station. The base station acts as the command centre to manage the activities of the drones. However, an independent, localised and effective fleet control is required, potentially based on swarm intelligence, for the reasons: 1) increase in the number of drone fleets, 2) number of drones in a fleet might be multiple of tens, 3) time-criticality in making decisions by such fleets in the wild, 4) potential communication congestions/lag, and 5) in some cases working in challenging terrains that hinders or mandates-limited communication with control centre (i.e., operations spanning long period of times or military usage of such fleets in enemy territory). This self-ware, mission-focused and independent fleet of drones that potential utilises swarm intelligence for a) air-traffic and/or flight control management, b) obstacle avoidance, c) self-preservation while maintaining the mission criteria, d) collaboration with other fleets in the wild (autonomously) and e) assuring the security, privacy and safety of physical (drones itself) and virtual (data, software) assets. In this paper, we investigate the challenges faced by fleet of drones and propose a potential course of action on how to overcome them.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hivemind a scalable and serverless coordination control platform for uav swarms"):
  with members:
    - "convergence of edge computing and deep learning a comprehensive survey"
    - "serverless computing one step forward two steps back"
    - "cutting throughput on the edge app aware placement in fog computing"
    - "swarm coordination of mini uavs for target search using imperfect sensors"
    - "tensorflow large scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems"
    - "facenet a unified embedding for face recognition and clustering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "secure and secret cooperation of robotic swarms by using merkle trees"):
  with members:
    - "urban swarms a new approach for autonomous waste management"
    - "the blockchain a new framework for robotic swarm systems"
    - "evolution of collective behaviors for a real swarm of aquatic surface robots"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "securing fleets of consumer drones at low cost"):
  with members:
    - "dynamic routing for flying ad hoc networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "massive mimo for drone communications case studies and future directions"):
  with members:
    - "convolutionally coded snr adaptive transmission for low latency communications"
    - "understanding uav cellular communications from existing networks to massive mimo"
    - "mobile networks connected drones field trials simulations and design insights"
    - "the sky is not the limit lte for unmanned aerial vehicles"
    - "a telecom perspective on the internet of drones from lte advanced to 5g"
    - "a tutorial on uavs for wireless networks applications challenges and open problems"
    - "efficient dsp and circuit architectures for massive mimo state of the art and future directions"
    - "massive mimo for communications with drone swarms"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)