human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "defensive distillation is not robust to adversarial examples"
  Abstract: We show that defensive distillation is not secure: it is no more resistant to targeted misclassification attacks than unprotected neural networks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense"):
  with members:
    - "curls whey boosting black box adversarial attacks"
    - "one pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks"
    - "metric learning with horde high order regularizer for deep embeddings"
    - "sparse and imperceivable adversarial attacks"
    - "who s afraid of adversarial queries the impact of image modifications on content based image retrieval"
    - "hopskipjumpattack a query efficient decision based attack"
    - "towards adversarially robust object detection"
    - "defense against adversarial images using web scale nearest neighbor search"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "challenges and countermeasures for adversarial attacks on deep reinforcement learning"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial policies attacking deep reinforcement learning"
    - "distilling policy distillation"
    - "sequential triggers for watermarking of deep reinforcement learning policies"
    - "deceptive reinforcement learning under adversarial manipulations on cost signals"
    - "adversarial exploitation of policy imitation"
    - "wasserstein robust reinforcement learning"
    - "rl based method for benchmarking the adversarial resilience and robustness of deep reinforcement learning policies"
    - "analysis and improvement of adversarial training in dqn agents with adversarially guided exploration age"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fast is better than free revisiting adversarial training"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial training and robustness for multiple perturbations"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "me net towards effective adversarial robustness with matrix estimation"
    - "provably robust deep learning via adversarially trained smoothed classifiers"
    - "adversarial training for free"
    - "adversarial robustness against the union of multiple perturbation models"
    - "on evaluating adversarial robustness"
    - "scaling provable adversarial defenses"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "on adaptive attacks to adversarial example defenses"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial training and robustness for multiple perturbations"
    - "adversarial example detection and classification with asymmetrical adversarial training"
    - "an alternative surrogate loss for pgd based adversarial testing"
    - "mixup inference better exploiting mixup to defend adversarial attacks"
    - "improving adversarial robustness via promoting ensemble diversity"
    - "a new defense against adversarial images turning a weakness into a strength"
    - "resisting adversarial attacks by k winners take all"
    - "rethinking softmax cross entropy loss for adversarial robustness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "raid randomized adversarial input detection for neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "when explainability meets adversarial learning detecting adversarial examples using shap signatures"
    - "are odds really odd bypassing statistical detection of adversarial examples"
    - "deepsmartfuzzer reward guided test generation for deep learning"
    - "deepfault fault localization for deep neural networks"
    - "a new defense against adversarial images turning a weakness into a strength"
    - "the odds are odd a statistical test for detecting adversarial examples"
    - "on evaluating adversarial robustness"
    - "deepgauge multi granularity testing criteria for deep learning systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "semantic adversarial perturbations using learnt representations"):
  with members:
    - "semanticadv generating adversarial examples via attribute conditional image editing"
    - "algorithms for verifying deep neural networks"
    - "generating semantic adversarial examples with differentiable rendering"
    - "testing robustness against unforeseen adversaries"
    - "benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations"
    - "adversarial attacks and defenses in images graphs and text a review"
    - "adaptive generation of unrestricted adversarial inputs"
    - "semantic adversarial examples"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "minimax defense against gradient based adversarial attacks"):
  with members:
    - "defense gan protecting classifiers against adversarial attacks using generative models"
    - "adversarial robustness toolbox v1 0 0"
    - "obfuscated gradients give a false sense of security circumventing defenses to adversarial examples"
    - "adversarial examples are not easily detected bypassing ten detection methods"
    - "magnet a two pronged defense against adversarial examples"
    - "ape gan adversarial perturbation elimination with gan"
    - "safetynet detecting and rejecting adversarial examples robustly"
    - "magnet and efficient defenses against adversarial attacks are not robust to adversarial examples"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "detecting and recovering adversarial examples an input sensitivity guided method"):
  with members:
    - "simple black box adversarial attacks"
    - "gradient similarity an explainable approach to detect adversarial attacks against deep learning"
    - "obfuscated gradients give a false sense of security circumventing defenses to adversarial examples"
    - "threat of adversarial attacks on deep learning in computer vision a survey"
    - "adversarial examples are not easily detected bypassing ten detection methods"
    - "adversarial and clean data are not twins"
    - "magnet a two pronged defense against adversarial examples"
    - "magnet and efficient defenses against adversarial attacks are not robust to adversarial examples"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)