human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "how journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research a comparison between innovation studies and business management"
  Abstract: This study provides quantitative evidence on how the use of journal rankings can disadvantage interdisciplinary research in research evaluations. Using publication and citation data, it compares the degree of interdisciplinarity and the research performance of a number of Innovation Studies units with that of leading Business & Management schools in the UK. On the basis of various mappings and metrics, this study shows that: (i) Innovation Studies units are consistently more interdisciplinary in their research than Business & Management schools; (ii) the top journals in the Association of Business Schools' rankings span a less diverse set of disciplines than lower-ranked journals; (iii) this results in a more favourable assessment of the performance of Business & Management schools, which are more disciplinary-focused. This citation-based analysis challenges the journal ranking-based assessment. In short, the investigation illustrates how ostensibly 'excellence-based' journal rankings exhibit a systematic bias in favour of mono-disciplinary research. The paper concludes with a discussion of implications of these phenomena, in particular how the bias is likely to affect negatively the evaluation and associated financial resourcing of interdisciplinary research organisations, and may result in researchers becoming more compliant with disciplinary authority over time.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the differing meanings of indicators under different policy contexts the case of internationalisation"):
  with members:
    - "making sense of global collaboration dynamics developing a methodological framework to study dis similarities between country disciplinary profiles and choice of collaboration partners"
    - "mining university rankings publication output and citation impact as their basis"
    - "the many faces of mobility using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientists"
    - "do interdisciplinary research teams deliver higher gains to science"
    - "global research collaboration networks and partners in south east asia"
    - "a critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings"
    - "interpreting altmetrics viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories"
    - "towards a global scientific brain indicators of researcher mobility using co affiliation data"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "consistency and validity of interdisciplinarity measures"):
  with members:
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals diversity centrality and citations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "when research assessment exercises leave room for opportunistic behavior by the subjects under evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "peer review versus bibliometrics which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications"
    - "diversification versus specialization in scientific research which strategy pays off"
    - "on tit for tat franceschini and maisano versus anvur regarding the italian research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "bibliometric evaluation of research performance where do we stand"
    - "do they agree bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the italian research assessment exercise"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "the vqr italy s second national research assessment methodological failures and ranking distortions"
    - "the determinants of academic career advancement evidence from italy"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals rao stirling diversity relative variety and the gini coefficient"):
  with members:
    - "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references"
    - "diversity and interdisciplinarity how can one distinguish and recombine disparity variety and balance"
    - "mapping patent classifications portfolio and statistical analysis and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses"
    - "betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity a tribute to eugene garfield"
    - "information metrics imetrics a research specialty with a socio cognitive identity"
    - "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations"
    - "indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals diversity centrality and citations"
    - "science overlay maps a new tool for research policy and library management"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "consistency of interdisciplinarity measures"):
  with members:
    - "indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals diversity centrality and citations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity a tribute to eugene garfield"):
  with members:
    - "generating clustered journal maps an automated system for hierarchical classification"
    - "co word maps and topic modeling a comparison using small and medium sized corpora n 1000"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "can technology life cycles be indicated by diversity in patent classifications the crucial role of variety"
    - "interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level the changing knowledge bases of the journal cognitive science"
    - "a bird s eye view of scientific trading dependency relations among fields of science"
    - "a new methodology for constructing a publication level classification system of science"
    - "betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "analyzing the disciplinary focus of universities can rankings be a one size fits all"):
  with members:
    - "what do university rankings by fields rank exploring discrepancies between the organizational structure of universities and bibliometric classifications"
    - "does google scholar contain all highly cited documents 1950 2013"
    - "an insight into the importance of national university rankings in an international context the case of the i ugr rankings of spanish universities"
    - "citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research"
    - "reviewers ratings and bibliometric indicators hand in hand when assessing over research proposals"
    - "the google scholar experiment how to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators"
    - "mapping academic institutions according to their journal publication profile spanish universities as a case study"
    - "the leiden ranking 2011 2012 data collection indicators and interpretation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "evaluating journal quality a review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management"):
  with members:
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non experts the case of two snip versions"
    - "identifying research fields within business and management a journal cross citation analysis"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "aggregated journal journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks maps and interactive overlays"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "a systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)