human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on characterization of feasible interference regions in cognitive radio networks"
  Abstract: In an underlay cognitive radio network (CRN), in order to guarantee that all primary users (PUs) achieve their target-signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios (target-SINRs), the interference caused by all secondary users (SUs) to the primary receiving-points should be controlled. To do so, the feasible cognitive interference region (FCIR), i.e., the region for allowable values of interference at all of the primary receiving-points, which guarantee the protection of the PUs, needs to be formally characterized. In the state-of-the-art interference management schemes for underlay CRNs, it is considered that all PUs are protected if the cognitive interference for each primary receiving-point is lower than a maximum threshold, the so called interference temperature limit (ITL) for the corresponding receiving-point. This is assumed to be fixed and independent of ITL values for other primary receiving-points, which corresponds to a box-like FCIR. In this paper, we characterize the FCIR for  uplink  transmissions in cellular CRNs and for direct transmissions in ad-hoc CRNs. We show that the FCIR is in fact a polyhedron (i.e., the maximum feasible cognitive interference threshold for each primary receiving-point is not a constant, and it depends on that for the other primary receiving-points). Therefore, in practical interference management algorithms, it is not proper to consider a constant and independent ITL value for each of the primary receiving-points. This finding would significantly affect the design of practical interference management schemes for CRNs. To demonstrate this, based on the characterized FCIR, we propose two power control algorithms to find the maximum number of admitted SUs and the maximum aggregate throughput of the SUs in infeasible and feasible CRNs, respectively. For two distinct objectives, our proposed interference management schemes outperform the existing ones. The numerical results also demonstrate how the assumption of fixed ITL values leads to poor performance measures in CRNs.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sense and predict harnessing spatial interference correlation for cognitive radio networks"):
  with members:
    - "ultra reliable and low latency communications in 5g downlink physical layer aspects"
    - "millimeter wave interference avoidance via building aware associations"
    - "the connectivity of millimeter wave networks in urban environments modeled using random lattices"
    - "macro diversity in cellular networks with random blockages"
    - "sense and predict opportunistic mac based on spatial interference correlation for cognitive radio networks"
    - "downlink and uplink cell association with traditional macrocells and millimeter wave small cells"
    - "spatio temporal interference correlation and joint coverage in cellular networks"
    - "design and analysis of initial access in millimeter wave cellular networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey of anticipatory mobile networking context based classification prediction methodologies and optimization techniques"):
  with members:
    - "context aware scheduling of joint millimeter wave and microwave resources for dual mode base stations"
    - "anticipatory radio resource management for mobile video streaming with linear programming"
    - "kernel based adaptive online reconstruction of coverage maps with side information"
    - "spatial wireless channel prediction under location uncertainty"
    - "a control theoretic approach to adaptive video streaming in dense wireless networks"
    - "5g cellular key enabling technologies and research challenges"
    - "context aware small cell networks how social metrics improve wireless resource allocation"
    - "anticipatory mobile computing a survey of the state of the art and research challenges"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)