human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "graph operations on parity games and polynomial time algorithms"
  Abstract: Parity games are games that are played on directed graphs whose vertices are labeled by natural numbers, called priorities. The players push a token along the edges of the digraph. The winner is determined by the parity of the greatest priority occurring infinitely often in this infinite play. #R##N#A motivation for studying parity games comes from the area of formal verification of systems by model checking. Deciding the winner in a parity game is polynomial time equivalent to the model checking problem of the modal mu-calculus. Another strong motivation lies in the fact that the exact complexity of solving parity games is a long-standing open problem, the currently best known algorithm being subexponential. It is known that the problem is in the complexity classes UP and coUP. #R##N#In this paper we identify restricted classes of digraphs where the problem is solvable in polynomial time, following an approach from structural graph theory. We consider three standard graph operations: the join of two graphs, repeated pasting along vertices, and the addition of a vertex. Given a class C of digraphs on which we can solve parity games in polynomial time, we show that the same holds for the class obtained from C by applying once any of these three operations to its elements. #R##N#These results provide, in particular, polynomial time algorithms for parity games whose underlying graph is an orientation of a complete graph, a complete bipartite graph, a block graph, or a block-cactus graph. These are classes where the problem was not known to be efficiently solvable. #R##N#Previous results concerning restricted classes of parity games which are solvable in polynomial time include classes of bounded tree-width, bounded DAG-width, and bounded clique-width. #R##N#We also prove that recognising the winning regions of a parity game is not easier than computing them from scratch.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "winning cores in parity games"):
  with members:
    - "fatal attractors in parity games building blocks for partial solvers"
    - "benchmarks for parity games"
    - "linear time algorithm for weak parity games"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "strategy derivation for small progress measures"):
  with members:
    - "zielonka s recursive algorithm dull weak and solitaire games and tighter bounds"
    - "non oblivious strategy improvement"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)