human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "rapid asynchronous plurality consensus"
  Abstract: We consider distributed plurality consensus in a complete graph of size $n$ with $k$ initial opinions. We design an efficient and simple protocol in the asynchronous communication model that ensures that all nodes eventually agree on the initially most frequent opinion. In this model, each node is equipped with a random Poisson clock with parameter $\lambda=1$. Whenever a node's clock ticks, it samples some neighbors, uniformly at random and with replacement, and adjusts its opinion according to the sample. #R##N#A prominent example is the so-called two-choices algorithm in the synchronous model, where in each round, every node chooses two neighbors uniformly at random, and if the two sampled opinions coincide, then that opinion is adopted. This protocol is very efficient and well-studied when $k=2$. If $k=O(n^\varepsilon)$ for some small $\varepsilon$, we show that it converges to the initial plurality opinion within $O(k \cdot \log{n})$ rounds, w.h.p., as long as the initial difference between the largest and second largest opinion is $\Omega(\sqrt{n \log n})$. On the other side, we show that there are cases in which $\Omega(k)$ rounds are needed, w.h.p. #R##N#One can beat this lower bound in the synchronous model by combining the two-choices protocol with randomized broadcasting. Our main contribution is a non-trivial adaptation of this approach to the asynchronous model. If the support of the most frequent opinion is at least $(1+\varepsilon)$ times that of the second-most frequent one and $k=O(\exp(\log{n}/\log \log{n}))$, then our protocol achieves the best possible run time of $O(\log n)$, w.h.p. We relax full synchronicity by allowing $o(n)$ nodes to be poorly synchronized, and the well synchronized nodes are only required to be within a certain time difference from one another. We enforce this synchronicity by introducing a novel gadget into the protocol.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "noidy conmunixatipn on the convergence of the averaging population protocol"):
  with members:
    - "almost logarithmic time space optimal leader election in population protocols"
    - "fast space optimal leader election in population protocols"
    - "erasure correction for noisy radio networks"
    - "limits for rumor spreading in stochastic populations"
    - "ignore or comply on breaking symmetry in consensus"
    - "broadcasting in noisy radio networks"
    - "space optimal majority in population protocols"
    - "efficient k party voting with two choices"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "fpc bi fast probabilistic consensus within byzantine infrastructures"):
  with members:
    - "communication cost of consensus for nodes with limited memory"
    - "scalable byzantine consensus via hardware assisted secret sharing"
    - "stabilizing consensus with many opinions"
    - "the power of two choices in distributed voting"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on fast probabilistic consensus in the byzantine setting"):
  with members:
    - "communication cost of consensus for nodes with limited memory"
    - "scalable byzantine consensus via hardware assisted secret sharing"
    - "stabilizing consensus with many opinions"
    - "the power of two choices in distributed voting"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "distributed community detection via metastability of the 2 choices dynamics"):
  with members:
    - "pooling or sampling collective dynamics for electrical flow estimation"
    - "phase transition of the 2 choices dynamics on core periphery networks"
    - "the ants problem"
    - "limits for rumor spreading in stochastic populations"
    - "ignore or comply on breaking symmetry in consensus"
    - "distributed graph clustering and sparsification"
    - "average whenever you meet opportunistic protocols for community detection"
    - "a tight analysis of the parallel undecided state dynamics with two colors"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)