human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "greedy algorithms make efficient mechanisms"
  Abstract: We study mechanisms that use greedy allocation rules and pay-your-bid pricing to allocate resources subject to a matroid constraint. We show that all such mechanisms obtain a constant fraction of the optimal welfare at any equilibrium of bidder behavior, via a smoothness argument. This unifies numerous recent results on the price of anarchy of simple auctions. Our results extend to polymatroid and matching constraints, and we discuss extensions to more general matroid intersections.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on conceptually simple algorithms for variants of online bipartite matching"):
  with members:
    - "an experimental study of algorithms for online bipartite matching"
    - "on the limitations of deterministic de randomizations for online bipartite matching and max sat"
    - "computing maximum flow with augmenting electrical flows"
    - "on the power of advice and randomization for online bipartite matching"
    - "new algorithms better bounds and a novel model for online stochastic matching"
    - "deterministic algorithms for submodular maximization problems"
    - "greedy matching guarantees and limitations"
    - "matchings with lower quotas algorithms and complexity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "simple mechanisms for agents with complements"):
  with members:
    - "simple auctions for agents with complements"
    - "interpolating between truthful and non truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctions"
    - "the pseudo dimension of near optimal auctions"
    - "simple mechanisms for a subadditive buyer and applications to revenue monotonicity"
    - "on the complexity of computing an equilibrium in combinatorial auctions"
    - "a simple and approximately optimal mechanism for an additive buyer"
    - "an n to 1 bidder reduction for multi item auctions and its applications"
    - "a unifying hierarchy of valuations with complements and substitutes"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)