human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises"
  Abstract: One of the critical issues in national research assessment exercises concerns the choice of whether to evaluate the entire scientific portfolio of the institutions or a subset composed of the best products. Under the second option, the capacities of the institutions to select the appropriate researchers and their best products (the UK case) or simply the best products of every researcher (the Italian case) becomes critical, both for purposes of correct assessment of the real quality of research in the institutions evaluated, and for the selective funding that follows. In this work, through case studies of three Italian universities, we analyze the efficiency of the product selection that is intended to maximize the universities' scores in the current national research assessment exercise, the results of which will be the basis for assigning an important share of public financing over the coming years.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "when research assessment exercises leave room for opportunistic behavior by the subjects under evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "peer review versus bibliometrics which method better predicts the scholarly impact of publications"
    - "diversification versus specialization in scientific research which strategy pays off"
    - "on tit for tat franceschini and maisano versus anvur regarding the italian research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "bibliometric evaluation of research performance where do we stand"
    - "do they agree bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the italian research assessment exercise"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "the vqr italy s second national research assessment methodological failures and ranking distortions"
    - "the determinants of academic career advancement evidence from italy"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on tit for tat franceschini and maisano versus anvur regarding the italian research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"):
  with members:
    - "do they agree bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the italian research assessment exercise"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "the vqr italy s second national research assessment methodological failures and ranking distortions"
    - "measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline"
    - "the importance of accounting for the number of co authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences"
    - "national peer review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money the italian case"
    - "research productivity are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones"
    - "national research assessment exercises a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "bibliometric evaluation of research performance where do we stand"):
  with members:
    - "measuring science irresistible temptations easy shortcuts and dangerous consequences"
    - "a sensitivity analysis of researchers productivity rankings to the time of citation observation"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"
    - "individual research performance a proposal for comparing apples to oranges"
    - "what is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance"
    - "revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment"
    - "national research assessment exercises a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the north south divide in the italian higher education system"):
  with members:
    - "accounting for gender research performance differences in ranking universities"
    - "do they agree bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the italian research assessment exercise"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "a methodology to measure the effectiveness of academic recruitment and turnover"
    - "the vqr italy s second national research assessment methodological failures and ranking distortions"
    - "should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender"
    - "the determinants of academic career advancement evidence from italy"
    - "relatives in the same university faculty nepotism or merit"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications as used in the italian national research assessment exercise vqr 2011 2014"):
  with members:
    - "do they agree bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the italian research assessment exercise"
    - "the vqr italy s second national research assessment methodological failures and ranking distortions"
    - "national peer review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money the italian case"
    - "the dangers of performance based research funding in non competitive higher education systems"
    - "national research assessment exercises the effects of changing the rules of the game during the game"
    - "citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality could the latter ever be preferable"
    - "allocative efficiency in public research funding can bibliometrics help"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the vqr italy s second national research assessment methodological failures and ranking distortions"):
  with members:
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "the importance of accounting for the number of co authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences"
    - "national peer review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money the italian case"
    - "revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment"
    - "a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large scale research assessments"
    - "the role of information asymmetry in the market for university industry research collaboration"
    - "national research assessment exercises a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings"
    - "evaluating research from informed peer review to bibliometrics"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "ranking research institutions by the number of highly cited articles per scientist"):
  with members:
    - "mapping excellence in national research systems the case of italy"
    - "a sensitivity analysis of researchers productivity rankings to the time of citation observation"
    - "are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones"
    - "how do you define and measure research productivity"
    - "the importance of accounting for the number of co authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences"
    - "what is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance"
    - "the leiden ranking 2011 2012 data collection indicators and interpretation"
    - "revisiting size effects in higher education research productivity"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)