human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "non clairvoyant batch sets scheduling fairness is fair enough"
  Abstract: Scheduling questions arise naturally in many different areas among which operating system design, compiling,... In real life systems, the characteristics of the jobs (such as release time and processing time) are usually unknown and unpredictable beforehand. The system is typically unaware of the remaining work in each job or of the ability of the job to take advantage of more resources. Following these observations, we adopt the job model by Edmonds et al (2000, 2003) in which the jobs go through a sequence of different phases. Each phase consists of a certain quantity of work and a speed-up function that models how it takes advantage of the number of processors it receives. We consider the non-clairvoyant online setting where a collection of jobs arrives at time 0. We consider the metrics setflowtime introduced by Robert et al (2007). The goal is to minimize the sum of the completion time of the sets, where a set is completed when all of its jobs are done. If the input consists of a single set of jobs, this is simply the makespan of the jobs; and if the input consists of a collection of singleton sets, it is simply the flowtime of the jobs. We show that the non-clairvoyant strategy EQUIoEQUI that evenly splits the available processors among the still unserved sets and then evenly splits these processors among the still uncompleted jobs of each unserved set, achieves a competitive ratio (2+\sqrt3+o(1))\frac{ln n}{lnln n} for the setflowtime minimization and that this is asymptotically optimal (up to a constant factor), where n is the size of the largest set. For makespan minimization, we show that the non-clairvoyant strategy EQUI achieves a competitive ratio of (1+o(1))\frac{ln n}{lnln n}, which is again asymptotically optimal.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "energy efficient multiprocessor scheduling for flow time and makespan"):
  with members:
    - "nonclairvoyant speed scaling for flow and energy"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "scalable hierarchical scheduling for malleable parallel jobs on multiprocessor based systems"):
  with members:
    - "reshape a framework for dynamic resizing and scheduling of homogeneous applications in a parallel environment"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)