human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "energy and sampling constrained asynchronous communication"
  Abstract: The minimum energy, and, more generally, the minimum cost, to transmit one bit of information has been recently derived for bursty communication when information is available infrequently at random times at the transmitter. This result assumes that the receiver is always in the listening mode and samples all channel outputs until it makes a decision. If the receiver is constrained to sample only a fraction f>0 of the channel outputs, what is the cost penalty due to sparse output sampling? #R##N#Remarkably, there is no penalty: regardless of f>0 the asynchronous capacity per unit cost is the same as under full sampling, ie, when f=1. There is not even a penalty in terms of decoding delay---the elapsed time between when information is available until when it is decoded. This latter result relies on the possibility to sample adaptively; the next sample can be chosen as a function of past samples. Under non-adaptive sampling, it is possible to achieve the full sampling asynchronous capacity per unit cost, but the decoding delay gets multiplied by 1/f. Therefore adaptive sampling strategies are of particular interest in the very sparse sampling regime.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the strongly asynchronous massive access channel"):
  with members:
    - "on the capacity of the slotted strongly asynchronous channel with a bursty user"
    - "capacity of gaussian many access channels"
    - "asymptotically optimal matching of multiple sequences to source distributions and training sequences"
    - "asynchronous communication capacity bounds and suboptimality of training"
    - "optimal sequential frame synchronization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on the capacity of the slotted strongly asynchronous channel with a bursty user"):
  with members:
    - "asynchronous communication capacity bounds and suboptimality of training"
    - "asynchronous capacity per unit cost"
    - "optimal sequential frame synchronization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "sampling constrained asynchronous communication how to sleep efficiently"):
  with members:
    - "asynchronous communication capacity bounds and suboptimality of training"
    - "asynchronous capacity per unit cost"
    - "communication under strong asynchronism"
    - "optimal sequential frame synchronization"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)