human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "polynomial time algorithms for minimum energy scheduling"
  Abstract: The aim of power management policies is to reduce the amount of energy consumed by computer systems while maintaining satisfactory level of performance. One common method for saving energy is to simply suspend the system during the idle times. No energy is consumed in the suspend mode. However, the process of waking up the system itself requires a certain fixed amount of energy, and thus suspending the system is beneficial only if the idle time is long enough to compensate for this additional energy expenditure. In the specific problem studied in the paper, we have a set of jobs with release times and deadlines that need to be executed on a single processor. Preemptions are allowed. The processor requires energy L to be woken up and, when it is on, it uses one unit of energy per one unit of time. It has been an open problem whether a schedule minimizing the overall energy consumption can be computed in polynomial time. We solve this problem in positive, by providing an O(n^5)-time algorithm. In addition we provide an O(n^4)-time algorithm for computing the minimum energy schedule when all jobs have unit length.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "parallel machine scheduling to minimize energy consumption"):
  with members:
    - "a fully polynomial time approximation scheme for speed scaling with sleep state"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "green data centers a survey perspectives and future directions"):
  with members:
    - "new online algorithm for dynamic speed scaling with sleep state"
    - "a fully polynomial time approximation scheme for speed scaling with sleep state"
    - "sleepscale runtime joint speed scaling and sleep states management for power efficient data centers"
    - "throughput maximization in multiprocessor speed scaling"
    - "throughput maximization in the speed scaling setting"
    - "energy efficient scheduling with time and processors eligibility restrictions"
    - "speed scaling on parallel processors with migration"
    - "scalably scheduling power heterogeneous processors"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a fully polynomial time approximation scheme for speed scaling with sleep state"):
  with members:
    - "np hardness of speed scaling with a sleep state"
    - "speed scaling with power down scheduling for agreeable deadlines"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)