human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on tractable query evaluation for sparql"
  Abstract: Despite much work within the last decade on foundational properties of SPARQL - the standard query language for RDF data - rather little is known about the exact limits of tractability for this language. In particular, this is the case for SPARQL queries that contain the OPTIONAL-operator, even though it is one of the most intensively studied features of SPARQL. The aim of our work is to provide a more thorough picture of tractable classes of SPARQL queries. #R##N#In general, SPARQL query evaluation is PSPACE-complete in combined complexity, and it remains PSPACE-hard already for queries containing only the OPTIONAL-operator. To amend this situation, research has focused on "well-designed SPARQL queries" and their recent generalization "weakly well-designed SPARQL queries". For these two fragments the evaluation problem is coNP-complete in the absence of projection and SigmaP2-complete otherwise. Moreover, they have been shown to contain most SPARQL queries asked in practical settings. #R##N#In this paper, we study tractable classes of weakly well-designed queries in parameterized complexity considering the equivalent formulation as pattern trees. We give a complete characterization of the tractable classes in the case without projection. Moreover, we show a characterization of all tractable classes of simple well-designed pattern trees in the presence of projection.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "certain answers to a sparql query over a knowledge base extended version"):
  with members:
    - "the dl lite family and relations"
    - "foundations of sparql query optimization"
    - "semantics and complexity of sparql"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the tractability frontier of well designed sparql queries"):
  with members:
    - "the hardness of embedding grids and walls"
    - "the parameterized complexity of k biclique"
    - "semantics and complexity of sparql"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)