human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research"
  Abstract: Background: Citation analysis has become an important tool for research performance assessment in the medical sciences. However, different areas of medical research may have considerably different citation practices, even within the same medical field. Because of this, it is unclear to what extent citation-based bibliometric indicators allow for valid comparisons between research units active in different areas of medical research. Methodology: A visualization methodology is introduced that reveals differences in citation practices between medical research areas. The methodology extracts terms from the titles and abstracts of a large collection of publications and uses these terms to visualize the structure of a medical field and to indicate how research areas within this field differ from each other in their average citation impact. Results: Visualizations are provided for 32 medical fields, defined based on journal subject categories in the Web of Science database. The analysis focuses on three fields: Cardiac & cardiovascular systems, Clinical neurology, and Surgery. In each of these fields, there turn out to be large differences in citation practices between research areas. Low-impact research areas tend to focus on clinical intervention research, while high-impact research areas are often more oriented on basic and diagnostic research. Conclusions: Popular bibliometric indicators, such as the h-index and the impact factor, do not correct for differences in citation practices between medical fields. These indicators therefore cannot be used to make accurate between-field comparisons. More sophisticated bibliometric indicators do correct for field differences but still fail to take into account within-field heterogeneity in citation practices. As a consequence, the citation impact of clinical intervention research may be substantially underestimated in comparison with basic and diagnostic research. © 2013 van Eck et al.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "should citations be field normalized in evaluative bibliometrics an empirical analysis based on propensity score matching"):
  with members:
    - "the preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration"
    - "the geography of references in elite articles which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge"
    - "field normalization of scientometric indicators"
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "validity of basing authors publication strategy on journal impact factors"
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the citation disadvantage of clinical research"):
  with members:
    - "identifying translational science through embeddings of controlled vocabularies"
    - "word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes"
    - "efficient estimation of word representations in vector space"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators"):
  with members:
    - "relative citation ratio rcr an empirical attempt to study a new field normalized bibliometric indicator"
    - "citation analysis with microsoft academic"
    - "three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation"
    - "a comparison of university performance scores and ranks by mncs and fss"
    - "a farewell to the mncs and like size independent indicators"
    - "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"
    - "national disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator"
    - "quality versus quantity in scientific impact"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "bibliometric approximation of a scientific specialty by combining key sources title words authors and references"):
  with members:
    - "4d specialty approximation ability to distinguish between related specialties"
    - "investigation of partition cells as a structural basis suitable for assessments of individual scientists"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy rpys"
    - "partition based field normalization an approach to highly specialized publication records"
    - "a new methodology for constructing a publication level classification system of science"
    - "the structure and dynamics of co citation clusters a multiple perspective co citation analysis"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "topic modelling of empirical text corpora validity reliability and reproducibility in comparison to semantic maps"):
  with members:
    - "what is wrong with topic modeling and how to fix it using search based software engineering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "analyzing the disciplinary focus of universities can rankings be a one size fits all"):
  with members:
    - "what do university rankings by fields rank exploring discrepancies between the organizational structure of universities and bibliometric classifications"
    - "does google scholar contain all highly cited documents 1950 2013"
    - "an insight into the importance of national university rankings in an international context the case of the i ugr rankings of spanish universities"
    - "reviewers ratings and bibliometric indicators hand in hand when assessing over research proposals"
    - "the google scholar experiment how to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators"
    - "mapping academic institutions according to their journal publication profile spanish universities as a case study"
    - "the leiden ranking 2011 2012 data collection indicators and interpretation"
    - "the dangers of performance based research funding in non competitive higher education systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "citation score normalized by cited references csncr the introduction of a new citation impact indicator"):
  with members:
    - "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics"
    - "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators"
    - "investigation of partition cells as a structural basis suitable for assessments of individual scientists"
    - "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts"
    - "growth in the number of references in engineering journal papers during the 1972 2013 period"
    - "on the causes of subject specific citation rates in web of science"
    - "universality of scholarly impact metrics"
    - "a systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal journal citation relations"):
  with members:
    - "which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge"
    - "the dynamics of triads in aggregated journal journal citation relations specialty developments at the above journal level"
    - "journal portfolio analysis for countries cities and organizations maps and comparisons"
    - "large scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of web of science and scopus"
    - "the operationalization of fields as wos subject categories wcs in evaluative bibliometrics the cases of library and information science and science technology studies"
    - "how to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully a proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations"
    - "interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal journal citations"
    - "global maps of science based on the new web of science categories"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)