human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "fast and powerful hashing using tabulation"
  Abstract: Randomized algorithms are often enjoyed for their simplicity, but the hash functions employed to yield the desired probabilistic guarantees are often too complicated to be practical. Here we survey recent results on how simple hashing schemes based on tabulation provide unexpectedly strong guarantees. #R##N#Simple tabulation hashing dates back to Zobrist [1970]. Keys are viewed as consisting of $c$ characters and we have precomputed character tables $h_1,...,h_c$ mapping characters to random hash values. A key $x=(x_1,...,x_c)$ is hashed to $h_1[x_1] \oplus h_2[x_2].....\oplus h_c[x_c]$. This schemes is very fast with character tables in cache. While simple tabulation is not even 4-independent, it does provide many of the guarantees that are normally obtained via higher independence, e.g., linear probing and Cuckoo hashing. #R##N#Next we consider twisted tabulation where one input character is "twisted" in a simple way. The resulting hash function has powerful distributional properties: Chernoff-Hoeffding type tail bounds and a very small bias for min-wise hashing. This also yields an extremely fast pseudo-random number generator that is provably good for many classic randomized algorithms and data-structures. #R##N#Finally, we consider double tabulation where we compose two simple tabulation functions, applying one to the output of the other, and show that this yields very high independence in the classic framework of Carter and Wegman [1977]. In fact, w.h.p., for a given set of size proportional to that of the space consumed, double tabulation gives fully-random hashing. We also mention some more elaborate tabulation schemes getting near-optimal independence for given time and space. #R##N#While these tabulation schemes are all easy to implement and use, their analysis is not.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "algorithms for similarity search and pseudorandomness"):
  with members:
    - "hardness of approximate nearest neighbor search"
    - "fast locality sensitive hashing for approximate near neighbor search"
    - "fast similarity sketching"
    - "embedjoin efficient edit similarity joins via embeddings"
    - "optimal densification for fast and accurate minwise hashing"
    - "parameter free locality sensitive hashing for spherical range reporting"
    - "scalable and robust set similarity join"
    - "fast cross polytope locality sensitive hashing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "similarity problems in high dimensions"):
  with members:
    - "approximate furthest neighbor with application to annulus query"
    - "distributed pcp theorems for hardness of approximation in p"
    - "embedjoin efficient edit similarity joins via embeddings"
    - "parameter free locality sensitive hashing for spherical range reporting"
    - "a framework for similarity search with space time tradeoffs using locality sensitive filtering"
    - "optimal hashing based time space trade offs for approximate near neighbors"
    - "set similarity search beyond minhash"
    - "distance sensitive bloom filters without false negatives"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "one table to count them all parallel frequency estimation on single board computers"):
  with members:
    - "parallel mining of time faded heavy hitters"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "non empty bins with simple tabulation hashing"):
  with members:
    - "high speed hashing for integers and strings"
    - "hashing for statistics over k partitions"
    - "simple tabulation fast expanders double tabulation and high independence"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "bloom filters adaptivity and the dictionary problem"):
  with members:
    - "adaptive cuckoo filters"
    - "bloom filters in adversarial environments"
    - "how robust are linear sketches to adaptive inputs"
    - "don t thrash how to cache your hash on flash"
    - "backyard cuckoo hashing constant worst case operations with a succinct representation"
    - "an optimal bloom filter replacement based on matrix solving"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)