human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "exact algorithms for weighted and unweighted borda manipulation problems"
  Abstract: Both weighted and unweighted Borda manipulation problems have been proved $\mathcal{NP}$-hard. However, there is no exact combinatorial algorithm known for these problems. In this paper, we initiate the study of exact combinatorial algorithms for both weighted and unweighted Borda manipulation problems. More precisely, we propose $O^*((m\cdot 2^m)^{t+1})$time and $O^*(t^{2m})$time\footnote{$O^*()$ is the $O()$ notation with suppressed factors polynomial in the size of the input.} combinatorial algorithms for weighted and unweighted Borda manipulation problems, respectively, where $t$ is the number of manipulators and $m$ is the number of candidates. Thus, for $t=2$ we solve one of the open problems posted by Betzler et al. [IJCAI 2011]. As a byproduct of our results, we show that the {{unweighted Borda manipulation}} problem admits an algorithm of running time $O^*(2^{9m^2\log{m}})$, based on an integer linear programming technique. Finally, we study the {{unweighted Borda manipulation}} problem under single-peaked elections and present polynomial-time algorithms for the problem in the case of two manipulators, in contrast to the $\mathcal{NP}$-hardness of this case in general settings.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "kernelization complexity of possible winner and coalitional manipulation problems in voting"):
  with members:
    - "prices matter for the parameterized complexity of shift bribery"
    - "election attacks with few candidates"
    - "parameterized algorithmics for computational social choice nine research challenges"
    - "complexity of manipulation bribery and campaign management in bucklin and fallback voting"
    - "determining possible and necessary winners under common voting rules given partial orders"
    - "multivariate complexity analysis of swap bribery"
    - "towards a dichotomy of finding possible winners in elections based on scoring rules"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)