human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "synchronization of goodwin s oscillators under boundedness and nonnegativeness constraints for solutions"
  Abstract: In the recent paper by Hamadeh  et al.  (2012) an elegant analytic criterion for incremental output feedback passivity (iOFP) of cyclic feedback systems (CFS) has been reported, assuming that the constituent subsystems are incrementally output strictly passive (iOSP). This criterion was used to prove that a network of identical CFS can be synchronized under sufficiently strong linear diffusive coupling. A very important class of CFS consists of biological oscillators, named after Brian Goodwin and describing self-regulated chains of enzymatic reactions, where the product of each reaction catalyzes the next reaction, while the last product inhibits the first reaction in the chain. Goodwin's oscillators are used, in particular, to model the dynamics of genetic circadian pacemakers, hormonal cycles and some metabolic pathways. In this technical note we point out that for Goodwin's oscillators, where the individual reactions have nonlinear (e.g., Mikhaelis-Menten) kinetics, the synchronization criterion, obtained by Hamadeh  et al. , cannot be directly applied. This criterion relies on the implicit assumption of the solution   boundedness  , dictated also by the chemical feasibility (the state variables stand for the concentrations of chemicals). Furthermore, to test the synchronization condition one needs to know an   explicit   bound for a solution, which generally cannot be guaranteed under linear coupling. At the same time, we show that these restrictions can be avoided for a   nonlinear    synchronization protocol, where the control inputs are “saturated” by a special nonlinear function (belonging to a wide class), which guarantees nonnegativity of the solutions and allows to get explicit ultimate bounds for them. We prove that oscillators synchronize under such a protocol, provided that the couplings are sufficiently strong.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "synchronization of pulse coupled oscillators and clocks under minimal connectivity assumptions"):
  with members:
    - "global synchronization of pulse coupled oscillators interacting on cycle graphs"
    - "increasing sync rate of pulse coupled oscillators via phase response function design theory and application to wireless networks"
    - "robust self triggered coordination with ternary controllers"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SY(Systems and Control)