human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the power of shared randomness in uncertain communication"
  Abstract: In a recent work (Ghazi et al., SODA 2016), the authors with Komargodski and Kothari initiated the study of communication with contextual uncertainty, a setup aiming to understand how efficient communication is possible when the communicating parties imperfectly share a huge context. In this setting, Alice is given a function $f$ and an input string $x$, and Bob is given a function $g$ and an input string $y$. The pair $(x,y)$ comes from a known distribution $\mu$ and $f$ and $g$ are guaranteed to be close under this distribution. Alice and Bob wish to compute $g(x,y)$ with high probability. The previous work showed that any problem with one-way communication complexity $k$ in the standard model has public-coin communication $O(k(1+I))$ bits in the uncertain case, where $I$ is the mutual information between $x$ and $y$. A lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{I})$ bits on the public-coin uncertain communication was also shown. An important question that was left open is the power that public randomness brings to uncertain communication. Can Alice and Bob achieve efficient communication amid uncertainty without using public randomness? How powerful are public-coin protocols in overcoming uncertainty? Motivated by these two questions: #R##N#- We prove the first separation between private-coin uncertain communication and public-coin uncertain communication. We exhibit a function class for which the communication in the standard model and the public-coin uncertain communication are $O(1)$ while the private-coin uncertain communication is a growing function of the length $n$ of the inputs. #R##N#- We improve the lower-bound of the previous work on public-coin uncertain communication. We exhibit a function class and a distribution (with $I \approx n$) for which the one-way certain communication is $k$ bits but the one-way public-coin uncertain communication is at least $\Omega(\sqrt{k} \cdot \sqrt{I})$ bits.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "round complexity of common randomness generation the amortized setting"):
  with members:
    - "communication rounds tradeoffs for common randomness and secret key generation"
    - "resource efficient common randomness and secret key schemes"
    - "secret key generation with limited interaction"
    - "on the role of shared randomness in simultaneous communication"
    - "secret key generation with one communicator and a one shot converse via hypercontractivity"
    - "communication complexity of permutation invariant functions"
    - "communication with imperfectly shared randomness"
    - "common information and secret key capacity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "universal communication universal graphs and graph labeling"):
  with members:
    - "near log convexity of measured heat in discrete time and consequences"
    - "an optimal ancestry labeling scheme with applications to xml trees and universal posets"
    - "on the implicit graph conjecture"
    - "communication with contextual uncertainty"
    - "optimal induced universal graphs and adjacency labeling for trees"
    - "contact representations of graphs in 3d"
    - "sublinear distance labeling"
    - "distance labeling schemes for trees"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "communication with contextual uncertainty"):
  with members:
    - "on the role of shared randomness in simultaneous communication"
    - "communication complexity of permutation invariant functions"
    - "communication with imperfectly shared randomness"
    - "deterministic compression with uncertain priors"
    - "information equals amortized communication"
    - "on extracting common random bits from correlated sources"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)