human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "limits of rush hour logic complexity"
  Abstract: Rush Hour Logic was introduced in [Flake&Baum99] as a model of computation inspired by the ``Rush Hour'' toy puzzle, in which cars can move horizontally or vertically within a parking lot. The authors show how the model supports polynomial space computation, using certain car configurations as building blocks to construct boolean circuits for a cpu and memory. They consider the use of cars of length 3 crucial to their construction, and conjecture that cars of size 2 only, which we'll call `Size 2 Rush Hour', do not support polynomial space computation. We settle this conjecture by showing that the required building blocks are constructible in Size 2 Rush Hour. Furthermore, we consider Unit Rush Hour, which was hitherto believed to be trivial, show its relation to maze puzzles, and provide empirical support for its hardness.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the hardness of unlabeled multi robot motion planning"):
  with members:
    - "motion planning for unlabeled discs with optimality guarantees"
    - "similar part rearrangement with pebble graphs"
    - "efficient multi robot motion planning for unlabeled discs in simple polygons"
    - "finding a needle in an exponential haystack discrete rrt for exploration of implicit roadmaps in multi robot motion planning"
    - "k color multi robot motion planning"
    - "on the power of manifold samples in exploring configuration spaces and the dimensionality of narrow passages"
    - "pspace completeness of sliding block puzzles and other problems through the nondeterministic constraint logic model of computation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "pspace completeness of sliding block puzzles and other problems through the nondeterministic constraint logic model of computation"):
  with members:
    - "playing games with algorithms algorithmic combinatorial game theory"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)