human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "software effort estimation based on optimized model tree"
  Abstract: Background: It is widely recognized that software effort estimation is a regression problem. Model Tree (MT) is one of the Machine Learning based regression techniques that is useful for software effort estimation, but as other machine learning algorithms, the MT has a large space of configuration and requires to carefully setting its parameters. The choice of such parameters is a dataset dependent so no general guideline can govern this process which forms the motivation of this work. Aims: This study investigates the effect of using the most recent optimization algorithm called Bees algorithm to specify the optimal choice of MT parameters that fit a dataset and therefore improve prediction accuracy. Method: We used MT with optimal parameters identified by the Bees algorithm to construct software effort estimation model. The model has been validated over eight datasets come from two main sources: PROMISE and ISBSG. Also we used 3-Fold cross validation to empirically assess the prediction accuracies of different estimation models. As benchmark, results are also compared to those obtained with Stepwise Regression Case-Based Reasoning and Multi-Layer Perceptron. Results: The results obtained from combination of MT and Bees algorithm are encouraging and outperforms other well-known estimation methods applied on employed datasets. They are also interesting enough to suggest the effectiveness of MT among the techniques that are suitable for effort estimation. Conclusions: The use of the Bees algorithm enabled us to automatically find optimal MT parameters required to construct effort estimation models that fit each individual dataset. Also it provided a significant improvement on prediction accuracy.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "machine learning and value generation in software development a survey"):
  with members:
    - "devops and its philosophy education matters"
    - "the standard coder a machine learning approach to measuring the effort required to produce source code change"
    - "teaching devops in academia and industry reflections and vision"
    - "teaching devops in corporate environments an experience report"
    - "axiomatic attribution for deep networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)