human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "fast approximate construction of best complex antipodal spherical codes"
  Abstract: Compressive Sensing (CS) theory states that real-world signals can often be recovered from much fewer measurements than those suggested by the Shannon sampling theorem. Nevertheless, recoverability does not only depend on the signal, but also on the measurement scheme. The measurement matrix should behave as close as possible to an isometry for the signals of interest. Therefore the search for optimal CS measurement matrices of size $m\times n$ translates into the search for a set of $n$ $m$-dimensional vectors with minimal coherence. Best Complex Antipodal Spherical Codes (BCASCs) are known to be optimal in terms of coherence. An iterative algorithm for BCASC generation has been recently proposed that tightly approaches the theoretical lower bound on coherence. Unfortunately, the complexity of each iteration depends quadratically on $m$ and $n$. In this work we propose a modification of the algorithm that allows reducing the quadratic complexity to linear on both $m$ and $n$. Numerical evaluation showed that the proposed approach does not worsen the coherence of the resulting BCASCs. On the contrary, an improvement was observed for large $n$. The reduction of the computational complexity paves the way for using the BCASCs as CS measurement matrices in problems with large $n$. We evaluate the CS performance of the BCASCs for recovering sparse signals. The BCASCs are shown to outperform both complex random matrices and Fourier ensembles as CS measurement matrices, both in terms of coherence and sparse recovery performance, especially for low $m/n$, which is the case of interest in CS.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "cube split a structured grassmannian constellation for non coherent simo communications"):
  with members:
    - "cube split structured quantizers on the grassmannian of lines"
    - "manopt a matlab toolbox for optimization on manifolds"
    - "on the capacity of large mimo block fading channels"
    - "quantization bounds on grassmann manifolds and applications to mimo communications"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)