human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "towards performance portability through locality awareness for applications using one sided communication primitives"
  Abstract: MPI is the most widely used data transfer and communication model in High Performance Computing. The latest version of the standard, MPI-3, allows skilled programmers to exploit all hardware capabilities of the latest and future supercomputing systems. The revised asynchronous remote-memory-access model in combination with the shared-memory window extension, in particular, allow writing code that hides communication latencies and optimizes communication paths according to the locality of data origin and destination. The latter is particularly important for today's multi- and many-core systems. However, writing such efficient code is highly complex and error-prone. In this paper we evaluate a recent remote-memory-access model, namely DART-MPI. This model claims to hide the aforementioned complexities from the programmer, but deliver locality-aware remote-memory-access semantics which outperforms MPI-3 one-sided communication primitives on multi-core systems. Conceptually, the DART-MPI interface is simple; at the same time it takes care of the complexities of the underlying MPI-3 and system topology. This makes DART-MPI an interesting candidate for porting legacy applications. We evaluate these claims using a realistic scientific application, specifically a finite-difference stencil code which solves the heat diffusion equation, on a large-scale Cray XC40 installation.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "asynchronous progress design for a mpi based pgas one sided communication system"):
  with members:
    - "leveraging mpi 3 shared memory extensions for efficient pgas runtime systems"
    - "dart mpi an mpi based implementation of a pgas runtime system"
    - "asynchronous mpi for the masses"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)