human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the violation heap a relaxed fibonacci like heap"
  Abstract: We give a priority queue that achieves the same amortized bounds as Fibonacci heaps. Namely, find-min requires O(1) worst-case time, insert, meld and decrease-key require O(1) amortized time, and delete-min requires $O(\log n)$ amortized time. Our structure is simple and promises an efficient practical behavior when compared to other known Fibonacci-like heaps. The main idea behind our construction is to propagate rank updates instead of performing cascaded cuts following a decrease-key operation, allowing for a relaxed structure.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "smooth heaps and a dual view of self adjusting data structures"):
  with members:
    - "weighted dynamic finger in binary search trees"
    - "improved bounds for multipass pairing heaps and path balanced binary search trees"
    - "pairing heaps the forward variant"
    - "the landscape of bounds for binary search trees"
    - "pattern avoiding access in binary search trees"
    - "greedy is an almost optimal deque"
    - "a back to basics empirical study of priority queues"
    - "a tight lower bound for decrease key in the pure heap model"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a tight lower bound for decrease key in the pure heap model"):
  with members:
    - "improved upper bounds for pairing heaps"
    - "pairing heaps with costless meld"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a back to basics empirical study of priority queues"):
  with members:
    - "improved upper bounds for pairing heaps"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "replacing mark bits with randomness in fibonacci heaps"):
  with members:
    - "fibonacci heaps revisited"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "fibonacci heaps revisited"):
  with members:
    - "replacing mark bits with randomness in fibonacci heaps"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "why some heaps support constant amortized time decrease key operations and others do not"):
  with members:
    - "improved upper bounds for pairing heaps"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)