human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "better bounds for coalescing branching random walks"
  Abstract: Coalescing-branching random walks, or {\em cobra walks} for short, are a natural variant of random walks on graphs that can model the spread of disease through contacts or the spread of information in networks. In a $k$-cobra walk, at each time step a subset of the vertices are active; each active vertex chooses $k$ random neighbors (sampled independently and uniformly with replacement) that become active at the next step, and these are the only active vertices at the next step. A natural quantity to study for cobra walks is the cover time, which corresponds to the expected time when all nodes have become infected or received the disseminated information. #R##N#In this work, we extend previous results for cobra walks in multiple ways. We show that the cover time for the 2-cobra walk on $[0,n]^d$ is $O(n)$ (where the order notation hides constant factors that depend on $d$); previous work had shown the cover time was $O(n \cdot polylog(n))$. We show that the cover time for a 2-cobra walk on an $n$-vertex $d$-regular graph with conductance $\phi_G$ is $O(\phi_G^{-2} \log^2 n)$, significantly generalizing a previous result that held only for expander graphs with sufficiently high expansion. And finally we show that the cover time for a 2-cobra walk on a graph with $n$ vertices is always $O(n^{11/4} \log n)$; this is the first result showing that the bound of $\Theta(n^3)$ for the worst-case cover time for random walks can be beaten using 2-cobra walks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "best of three voting on dense graphs"):
  with members:
    - "global majority consensus by local majority polling on graphs of a given degree sequence"
    - "fast plurality consensus in regular expanders"
    - "the power of two choices in distributed voting"
    - "simple dynamics for plurality consensus"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)