human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "parametric dependability analysis through probabilistic horn abduction"
  Abstract: Dependability modeling and evaluation is aimed at investigating that a system performs its function correctly in time. A usual way to achieve a high reliability, is to design redundant systems that contain several replicas of the same subsystem or component. State space methods for dependability analysis may suffer of the state space explosion problem in such a kind of situation. Combinatorial models, on the other hand, require the simplified assumption of statistical independence; however, in case of redundant systems, this does not guarantee a reduced number of modeled elements. In order to provide a more compact system representation, parametric system modeling has been investigated in the literature, in such a way that a set of replicas of a given subsystem is parameterized so that only one representative instance is explicitly included. While modeling aspects can be suitably addressed by these approaches, analytical tools working on parametric characterizations are often more difficult to be defined and the standard approach is to 'unfold' the parametric model, in order to exploit standard analysis algorithms working at the unfolded 'ground' level. Moreover, parameterized combinatorial methods still require the statistical independence assumption. In the present paper we consider the formalism of Parametric Fault Tree (PFT) and we show how it can be related to Probabilistic Horn Abduction (PHA). Since PHA is a framework where both modeling and analysis can be performed in a restricted first-order language, we aim at showing that converting a PFT into a PHA knowledge base will allow an approach to dependability analysis directly exploiting parametric representation. We will show that classical qualitative and quantitative dependability measures can be characterized within PHA. Furthermore, additional modeling aspects (such as noisy gates and local dependencies) as well as additional reliability measures (such as posterior probability analysis) can be naturally addressed by this conversion. A simple example of a multi-processor system with several replicated units is used to illustrate the approach.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)