human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on redundancy of memoryless sources over countable alphabets"
  Abstract: The minimum average number of bits need to describe a random variable is its entropy, assuming knowledge of the underlying statistics On the other hand, universal compression supposes that the distribution of the random variable, while unknown, belongs to a known set $\cal P$ of distributions. Such universal descriptions for the random variable are agnostic to the identity of the distribution in $\cal P$. But because they are not matched exactly to the underlying distribution of the random variable, the average number of bits they use is higher, and the excess over the entropy used is the "redundancy". This formulation is fundamental to problems not just in compression, but also estimation and prediction and has a wide variety of applications from language modeling to insurance. #R##N#In this paper, we study the redundancy of universal encodings of strings generated by independent identically distributed (iid) sampling from a set $\cal P$ of distributions over a countable support. We first show that if describing a single sample from $\cal P$ incurs finite redundancy, then $\cal P$ is tight but that the converse does not always hold. If a single sample can be described with finite worst-case-regret (a more stringent formulation than redundancy above), then it is known that length-$n$ iid samples only incurs a diminishing (in $n$) redundancy per symbol as $n$ increases. However, we show it is possible that a collection $\cal P$ incurs finite redundancy, yet description of length-$n$ iid samples incurs a constant redundancy per symbol encoded. We then show a sufficient condition on $\cal P$ such that length-$n$ iid samples will incur diminishing redundancy per symbol encoded.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "universal compression of envelope classes tight characterization via poisson sampling"):
  with members:
    - "about adaptive coding on countable alphabets max stable envelope classes"
    - "universal coding on infinite alphabets exponentially decreasing envelopes"
    - "universal source coding for monotonic and fast decaying monotonic distributions"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)