human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "models and algorithms for graph watermarking"
  Abstract: We introduce models and algorithmic foundations for graph watermarking. Our frameworks include security definitions and proofs, as well as characterizations when graph watermarking is algorithmically feasible, in spite of the fact that the general problem is NP-complete by simple reductions from the subgraph isomorphism or graph edit distance problems. In the digital watermarking of many types of files, an implicit step in the recovery of a watermark is the mapping of individual pieces of data, such as image pixels or movie frames, from one object to another. In graphs, this step corresponds to approximately matching vertices of one graph to another based on graph invariants such as vertex degree. Our approach is based on characterizing the feasibility of graph watermarking in terms of keygen, marking, and identification functions defined over graph families with known distributions. We demonstrate the strength of this approach with exemplary watermarking schemes for two random graph models, the classic Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi model and a random power-law graph model, both of which are used to model real-world networks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "robust active attacks on social graphs"):
  with members:
    - "conditional adjacency anonymity in social graphs under active attacks"
    - "preserving link privacy in social network based systems"
    - "de anonymizing social networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reconciling graphs and sets of sets"):
  with members:
    - "graph isomorphism in quasipolynomial time"
    - "multi party set reconciliation using characteristic polynomials"
    - "tight lower bound on the probability of a binomial exceeding its expectation"
    - "an efficient reconciliation algorithm for social networks"
    - "simple multi party set reconciliation"
    - "invertible bloom lookup tables"
    - "straggler identification in round trip data streams via newton s identities and invertible bloom filters"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "beyond the hype on using blockchains in trust management for authentication"):
  with members:
    - "from pretty good to great enhancing pgp using bitcoin and the blockchain"
    - "keeping authorities honest or bust with decentralized witness cosigning"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.MM(Multimedia)