human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "self improving algorithms for coordinate wise maxima"
  Abstract: Computing the coordinate-wise maxima of a planar point set is a classic and well-studied problem in computational geometry. We give an algorithm for this problem in the \emph{self-improving setting}. We have $n$ (unknown) independent distributions $\cD_1, \cD_2, ..., \cD_n$ of planar points. An input pointset $(p_1, p_2, ..., p_n)$ is generated by taking an independent sample $p_i$ from each $\cD_i$, so the input distribution $\cD$ is the product $\prod_i \cD_i$. A self-improving algorithm repeatedly gets input sets from the distribution $\cD$ (which is \emph{a priori} unknown) and tries to optimize its running time for $\cD$. Our algorithm uses the first few inputs to learn salient features of the distribution, and then becomes an optimal algorithm for distribution $\cD$. Let $\OPT_\cD$ denote the expected depth of an \emph{optimal} linear comparison tree computing the maxima for distribution $\cD$. Our algorithm eventually has an expected running time of $O(\text{OPT}_\cD + n)$, even though it did not know $\cD$ to begin with. #R##N#Our result requires new tools to understand linear comparison trees for computing maxima. We show how to convert general linear comparison trees to very restricted versions, which can then be related to the running time of our algorithm. An interesting feature of our algorithm is an interleaved search, where the algorithm tries to determine the likeliest point to be maximal with minimal computation. This allows the running time to be truly optimal for the distribution $\cD$.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a pac approach to application specific algorithm selection"):
  with members:
    - "the pseudo dimension of near optimal auctions"
    - "a bayesian approach to tackling hard computational problems"
    - "learning theory and algorithms for revenue optimization in second price auctions with reserve"
    - "algorithm runtime prediction methods evaluation"
    - "satzilla portfolio based algorithm selection for sat"
    - "truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CG(Computational Geometry)