human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on byzantine containment properties of the min 1 protocol"
  Abstract: Self-stabilization is a versatile approach to fault-tolerance since it permits a distributed system to recover from any transient fault that arbitrarily corrupts the contents of all memories in the system. Byzantine tolerance is an attractive feature of distributed systems that permits to cope with arbitrary malicious behaviors. We consider the well known problem of constructing a breadth-first spanning tree in this context. Combining these two properties proves difficult: we demonstrate that it is impossible to contain the impact of Byzantine nodes in a strictly or strongly stabilizing manner. We then adopt the weaker scheme of topology-aware strict stabilization and we present a similar weakening of strong stabilization. We prove that the classical $min+1$ protocol has optimal Byzantine containment properties with respect to these criteria.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "self stabilizing mobile byzantine tolerant regular register with bounded timestamp"):
  with members:
    - "maximum metric spanning tree made byzantine tolerant"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reliable communication in a dynamic network in the presence of byzantine faults"):
  with members:
    - "a scalable byzantine grid"
    - "iterative approximate byzantine consensus under a generalized fault model"
    - "iterative approximate byzantine consensus in arbitrary directed graphs"
    - "on byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"
    - "maximum metric spanning tree made byzantine tolerant"
    - "time varying graphs and dynamic networks"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on byzantine broadcast in planar graphs"):
  with members:
    - "a scalable byzantine grid"
    - "on byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"
    - "maximum metric spanning tree made byzantine tolerant"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "parameterizable byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"):
  with members:
    - "a scalable byzantine grid"
    - "on byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"
    - "maximum metric spanning tree made byzantine tolerant"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a scalable byzantine grid"):
  with members:
    - "maximum metric spanning tree made byzantine tolerant"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "on byzantine broadcast in loosely connected networks"):
  with members:
    - "maximum metric spanning tree made byzantine tolerant"
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "discovering network topology in the presence of byzantine faults"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "limiting byzantien influence in multihop asynchronous networks"):
  with members:
    - "bounding the impact of unbounded attacks in stabilization"
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "the byzantine brides problem"):
  with members:
    - "the impact of topology on byzantine containment in stabilization"
    - "a new self stabilizing maximal matching algorithm"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)