human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "limited benefit of cooperation in distributed relative localization"
  Abstract: Important applications in robotic and sensor networks require distributed algorithms to solve the so-called relative localization problem: a node-indexed vector has to be reconstructed from measurements of differences between neighbor nodes. In a recent note, we have studied the estimation error of a popular gradient descent algorithm showing that the mean square error has a minimum at a finite time, after which the performance worsens. This paper proposes a suitable modification of this algorithm incorporating more realistic "a priori" information on the position. The new algorithm presents a performance monotonically decreasing to the optimal one. Furthermore, we show that the optimal performance is approximated, up to a 1 + \eps factor, within a time which is independent of the graph and of the number of nodes. This convergence time is very much related to the minimum exhibited by the previous algorithm and both lead to the following conclusion: in the presence of noisy data, cooperation is only useful till a certain limit.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "distributed estimation from relative measurements of heterogeneous and uncertain quality"):
  with members:
    - "ergodic randomized algorithms and dynamics over networks"
    - "a distributed classification estimation algorithm for sensor networks"
    - "error scaling laws for linear optimal estimation from relative measurements"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ergodic randomized algorithms and dynamics over networks"):
  with members:
    - "pagerank optimization by edge selection"
    - "almost sure convergence of a randomized algorithm for relative localization in sensor networks"
    - "convergence of distributed randomized pagerank algorithms"
    - "gossips and prejudices ergodic randomized dynamics in social networks"
    - "opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks"
    - "distributed randomized algorithms for the pagerank computation"
    - "a web aggregation approach for distributed randomized pagerank algorithms"
    - "error scaling laws for linear optimal estimation from relative measurements"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SY(Systems and Control)