human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "uplink downlink tradeoff in secure distributed matrix multiplication"
  Abstract: In secure distributed matrix multiplication (SDMM) the multiplication $\mathbf{A}\mathbf{B}$ from two private matrices $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ is outsourced by a user to $N$ distributed servers. In $\ell$-SDMM, the goal is to a design a joint communication-computation procedure that optimally balances conflicting communication and computation metrics without leaking any information on both $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ to any set of $\ell\leq N$ servers. To this end, the user applies coding with $\tilde{\mathbf{A}}_i$ and $\tilde{\mathbf{B}}_i$ representing encoded versions of $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ destined to the $i$-th server. Now, SDMM involves multiple tradeoffs. One such tradeoff is the tradeoff between uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) costs. To find a good balance between these two metrics, we propose two schemes which we term USCSA and GSCSA that are based on secure cross subspace alignment (SCSA). We show that there are various scenarios where they outperform existing SDMM schemes from the literature with respect to the UL-DL efficiency. Next, we implement schemes from the literature, including USCSA and GSCSA, and test their performance on Amazon EC2. Our numerical results show that USCSA and GSCSA establish a good balance between the time spend on the communication and computation in SDMMs. This is because they combine advantages of polynomial codes, namely low time for the upload of $\left(\tilde{\mathbf{A}}_i,\tilde{\mathbf{B}}_i\right)_{i=1}^{N}$ and the computation of $\mathbf{O}_i=\tilde{\mathbf{A}}_i\tilde{\mathbf{B}}_i$, with those of SCSA, being a low timing overhead for the download of $\left(\mathbf{O}_i\right)_{i=1}^{N}$ and the decoding of $\mathbf{A}\mathbf{B}$.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "entangled polynomial codes for secure private and batch distributed matrix multiplication breaking the cubic barrier"):
  with members:
    - "codedprivateml a fast and privacy preserving framework for distributed machine learning"
    - "distributed and private coded matrix computation with flexible communication load"
    - "secure coded multi party computation for massive matrix operations"
    - "on the capacity of secure distributed matrix multiplication"
    - "private and secure distributed matrix multiplication with flexible communication load"
    - "private secure coded computation"
    - "harmonic coding an optimal linear code for privacy preserving gradient type computation"
    - "on the upload versus download cost for secure and private matrix multiplication"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "straggler mitigation in distributed matrix multiplication fundamental limits and optimal coding"):
  with members:
    - "codedprivateml a fast and privacy preserving framework for distributed machine learning"
    - "distributed and private coded matrix computation with flexible communication load"
    - "secure coded multi party computation for massive matrix operations"
    - "private and secure distributed matrix multiplication with flexible communication load"
    - "private secure coded computation"
    - "on the upload versus download cost for secure and private matrix multiplication"
    - "polyshard coded sharding achieves linearly scaling efficiency and security simultaneously"
    - "speeding up distributed machine learning using codes"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)