human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "leakage resilient non malleable secret sharing in non compartmentalized models"
  Abstract: Non-malleable secret sharing was recently proposed by Goyal and Kumar in independent tampering and joint tampering models for threshold secret sharing (STOC18) and secret sharing with general access structure (CRYPTO18). The idea of making secret sharing non-malleable received great attention and by now has generated many papers exploring new frontiers in this topic, such as multiple-time tampering and adding leakage resiliency to the one-shot tampering model. Non-compartmentalized tampering model was first studied by Agrawal this http URL (CRYPTO15) for non-malleability against permutation composed with bit-wise independent tampering, and shown useful in constructing non-malleable string commitments. We initiate the study of leakage-resilient secret sharing in the non-compartmentalized model. The leakage adversary can corrupt several players and obtain their shares, as in normal secret sharing. The leakage adversary can apply arbitrary affine functions with bounded total output length to the full share vector and obtain the outputs as leakage. These two processes can be both non-adaptive and do not depend on each other, or both adaptive and depend on each other with arbitrary ordering. We construct such leakage-resilient secret sharing schemes and achieve constant information ratio (the scheme for non-adaptive adversary is near optimal). We then explore making the non-compartmentalized leakage-resilient secret sharing also non-malleable against tampering. We consider a tampering model, where the adversary can use the shares obtained from the corrupted players and the outputs of the global leakage functions to choose a tampering function from a tampering family F. We give two constructions of such leakage-resilient non-malleable secret sharing for the case F is the bit-wise independent tampering and, respectively, for the case F is the affine tampering functions.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)