human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "verified uncertainty calibration"
  Abstract: Applications such as weather forecasting and personalized medicine demand models that output calibrated probability estimates---those representative of the true likelihood of a prediction. Most models are not calibrated out of the box but are recalibrated by post-processing model outputs. We find in this work that popular recalibration methods like Platt scaling and temperature scaling are (i) less calibrated than reported, and (ii) current techniques cannot estimate how miscalibrated they are. An alternative method, histogram binning, has measurable calibration error but is sample inefficient---it requires $O(B/\epsilon^2)$ samples, compared to $O(1/\epsilon^2)$ for scaling methods, where $B$ is the number of distinct probabilities the model can output. To get the best of both worlds, we introduce the scaling-binning calibrator, which first fits a parametric function to reduce variance and then bins the function values to actually ensure calibration. This requires only $O(1/\epsilon^2 + B)$ samples. Next, we show that we can estimate a model's calibration error more accurately using an estimator from the meteorological community---or equivalently measure its calibration error with fewer samples ($O(\sqrt{B})$ instead of $O(B)$). We validate our approach with multiclass calibration experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet, where we obtain a 35% lower calibration error than histogram binning and, unlike scaling methods, guarantees on true calibration. In these experiments, we also estimate the calibration error and ECE more accurately than the commonly used plugin estimators. We implement all these methods in a Python library: https://pypi.org/project/uncertainty-calibration

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "mix n match ensemble and compositional methods for uncertainty calibration in deep learning"):
  with members:
    - "evaluating model calibration in classification"
    - "when does label smoothing help"
    - "measuring calibration in deep learning"
    - "a simple baseline for bayesian uncertainty in deep learning"
    - "non parametric calibration for classification"
    - "pytorch an imperative style high performance deep learning library"
    - "dirichlet based gaussian processes for large scale calibrated classification"
    - "learning for single shot confidence calibration in deep neural networks through stochastic inferences"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "quantile regularization towards implicit calibration of regression models"):
  with members:
    - "evaluating model calibration in classification"
    - "when does label smoothing help"
    - "accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression"
    - "on calibration of modern neural networks"
    - "mixup beyond empirical risk minimization"
    - "regularizing neural networks by penalizing confident output distributions"
    - "rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "natural adversarial examples"):
  with members:
    - "hellaswag can a machine really finish your sentence"
    - "towards neural networks that provably know when they don t know"
    - "approximating cnns with bag of local features models works surprisingly well on imagenet"
    - "using self supervised learning can improve model robustness and uncertainty"
    - "detecting semantic anomalies"
    - "benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations"
    - "drop a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraphs"
    - "on evaluating adversarial robustness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "beyond temperature scaling obtaining well calibrated multiclass probabilities with dirichlet calibration"):
  with members:
    - "evaluating model calibration in classification"
    - "a simple baseline for bayesian uncertainty in deep learning"
    - "dirichlet based gaussian processes for large scale calibrated classification"
    - "accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression"
    - "on calibration of modern neural networks"
    - "deep networks with stochastic depth"
    - "densely connected convolutional networks"
    - "wide residual networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)