human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "certifiably robust interpretation in deep learning"
  Abstract: Deep learning interpretation is essential to explain the reasoning behind model predictions. Understanding the robustness of interpretation methods is important especially in sensitive domains such as medical applications since interpretation results are often used in downstream tasks. Although gradient-based saliency maps are popular methods for deep learning interpretation, recent works show that they can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. In this paper, we address this problem and provide a certifiable defense method for deep learning interpretation. We show that a sparsified version of the popular SmoothGrad method, which computes the average saliency maps over random perturbations of the input, is certifiably robust against adversarial perturbations. We obtain this result by extending recent bounds for certifiably robust smooth classifiers to the interpretation setting. Experiments on ImageNet samples validate our theory.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "robust saliency maps with decoy enhanced saliency score"):
  with members:
    - "understanding impacts of high order loss approximations and features in deep learning interpretation"
    - "interpreting neural networks using flip points"
    - "counterfactual visual explanations"
    - "explaining image classifiers by counterfactual generation"
    - "sanity checks for saliency maps"
    - "learning to explain an information theoretic perspective on model interpretation"
    - "deeppink reproducible feature selection in deep neural networks"
    - "generative image inpainting with contextual attention"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "de randomized smoothing for certifiable defense against patch attacks"):
  with members:
    - "curse of dimensionality on randomized smoothing for certifiable robustness"
    - "randomized smoothing of all shapes and sizes"
    - "certified robustness to label flipping attacks via randomized smoothing"
    - "random smoothing might be unable to certify ell_ infty robustness for high dimensional images"
    - "certified defenses for adversarial patches"
    - "tight certificates of adversarial robustness for randomly smoothed classifiers"
    - "robustness certificates for sparse adversarial attacks by randomized ablation"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"):
  with members:
    - "provably robust deep learning via adversarially trained smoothed classifiers"
    - "scaling provable adversarial defenses"
    - "the curse of concentration in robust learning evasion and poisoning attacks from concentration of measure"
    - "on the effectiveness of interval bound propagation for training verifiably robust models"
    - "sorting out lipschitz function approximation"
    - "a dual approach to scalable verification of deep networks"
    - "training verified learners with learned verifiers"
    - "lipschitz margin training scalable certification of perturbation invariance for deep neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "are perceptually aligned gradients a general property of robust classifiers"):
  with members:
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "defending against whitebox adversarial attacks via randomized discretization"
    - "a convex relaxation barrier to tight robustness verification of neural networks"
    - "theoretical evidence for adversarial robustness through randomization"
    - "obfuscated gradients give a false sense of security circumventing defenses to adversarial examples"
    - "towards robust neural networks via random self ensemble"
    - "mitigating evasion attacks to deep neural networks via region based classification"
    - "improving the robustness of deep neural networks via stability training"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)