human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "attacking graph based classification via manipulating the graph structure"
  Abstract: Graph-based classification methods are widely used for security and privacy analytics. Roughly speaking, graph-based classification methods include collective classification and graph neural network. Evading a graph-based classification method enables an attacker to evade detection in security analytics and can be used as a privacy defense against inference attacks. Existing adversarial machine learning studies mainly focused on machine learning for non-graph data. Only a few recent studies touched adversarial graph-based classification methods. However, they focused on graph neural network methods, leaving adversarial collective classification largely unexplored. We aim to bridge this gap in this work. We first propose a threat model to characterize the attack surface of a collective classification method. Specifically, we characterize an attacker's background knowledge along three dimensions: parameters of the method, training dataset, and the complete graph; an attacker's goal is to evade detection via manipulating the graph structure. We formulate our attack as a graph-based optimization problem, solving which produces the edges that an attacker needs to manipulate to achieve its attack goal. Moreover, we propose several approximation techniques to solve the optimization problem. We evaluate our attacks and compare them with a recent attack designed for graph neural networks. Results show that our attacks 1) can effectively evade graph-based classification methods; 2) do not require access to the true parameters, true training dataset, and/or complete graph; and 3) outperform the existing attack for evading collective classification methods and some graph neural network methods. We also apply our attacks to evade Sybil detection using a large-scale Twitter dataset and apply our attacks as a defense against attribute inference attacks using a large-scale Google+ dataset.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial attacks and defenses on graphs a review and empirical study"):
  with members:
    - "certified robustness of community detection against adversarial structural perturbation via randomized smoothing"
    - "adversarial attack on community detection by hiding individuals"
    - "transferring robustness for graph neural network against poisoning attacks"
    - "graph universal adversarial attacks a few bad actors ruin graph learning models"
    - "adversarial training methods for network embedding"
    - "adversarial examples on graph data deep insights into attack and defense"
    - "topology attack and defense for graph neural networks an optimization perspective"
    - "the general black box attack method for graph neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey of adversarial learning on graphs"):
  with members:
    - "heterogeneous graph neural networks for malicious account detection"
    - "dynamic graph convolutional networks"
    - "multiscale evolutionary perturbation attack on community detection"
    - "power up robust graph convolutional network against evasion attacks based on graph powering"
    - "topology attack and defense for graph neural networks an optimization perspective"
    - "time aware gradient attack on dynamic network link prediction"
    - "a restricted black box adversarial framework towards attacking graph embedding models"
    - "adversarial robustness of similarity based link prediction"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "certified robustness of community detection against adversarial structural perturbation via randomized smoothing"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial examples on graph data deep insights into attack and defense"
    - "topology attack and defense for graph neural networks an optimization perspective"
    - "tight certificates of adversarial robustness for randomly smoothed classifiers"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "certified robustness for top k predictions against adversarial perturbations via randomized smoothing"
    - "adversarial attacks on graph neural networks via meta learning"
    - "certifiable robustness to graph perturbations"
    - "adversarial attack on graph structured data"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "influence function based data poisoning attacks to top n recommender systems"):
  with members:
    - "private and communication efficient edge learning a sparse differential gaussian masking distributed sgd approach"
    - "byzantine resilient stochastic gradient descent for distributed learning a lipschitz inspired coordinate wise median approach"
    - "on the accuracy of influence functions for measuring group effects"
    - "local model poisoning attacks to byzantine robust federated learning"
    - "poisoning attacks to graph based recommender systems"
    - "data dropout optimizing training data for convolutional neural networks"
    - "byzantine robust distributed learning towards optimal statistical rates"
    - "manipulating machine learning poisoning attacks and countermeasures for regression learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "local model poisoning attacks to byzantine robust federated learning"):
  with members:
    - "analyzing federated learning through an adversarial lens"
    - "exploiting unintended feature leakage in collaborative learning"
    - "federated learning strategies for improving communication efficiency"
    - "poisoning attacks to graph based recommender systems"
    - "byzantine robust distributed learning towards optimal statistical rates"
    - "manipulating machine learning poisoning attacks and countermeasures for regression learning"
    - "is feature selection secure against training data poisoning"
    - "spectral signatures in backdoor attacks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)