human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "implicit diversity in image summarization"
  Abstract: Case studies, such as Kay et al., 2015 have shown that in image summarization, such as with Google Image Search, the people in the results presented for occupations are more imbalanced with respect to sensitive attributes such as gender and ethnicity than the ground truth. Most of the existing approaches to correct for this problem in image summarization assume that the images are labelled and use the labels for training the model and correcting for biases. However, these labels may not always be present. Furthermore, it is often not possible (nor even desirable) to automatically classify images by sensitive attributes such as gender or race. Moreover, balancing according to the labels does not guarantee that the diversity will be visibly apparent - arguably the only metric that matters when selecting diverse images. We develop a novel approach that takes as input a visibly diverse control set of images and uses this set to produce images in response to a query which is similarly visibly diverse. We implement this approach using pre-trained and modified Convolutional Neural Networks like VGG-16, and evaluate our approach empirically on the Image dataset compiled and used by Kay et al., 2015. We compare our results with the Google Image Search results from Kay et al., 2015 and natural baselines and observe that our algorithm produces images that are accurate with respect to their similarity to the query images (on par with that of the Google Image Search results), but significantly outperforms with respect to visible diversity as measured by their similarity to our diverse control set.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards fairer datasets filtering and balancing the distribution of the people subtree in the imagenet hierarchy"):
  with members:
    - "50 years of test un fairness lessons for machine learning"
    - "auditing imagenet towards a model driven framework for annotating demographic attributes of large scale image datasets"
    - "does object recognition work for everyone"
    - "model cards for model reporting"
    - "large scale long tailed recognition in an open world"
    - "women also snowboard overcoming bias in captioning models"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "learning adversarially fair and transferable representations"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)