human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "sat encodings for treecut width and treedepth"
  Abstract: In this paper we propose, implement, and test the first practical decomposition algorithms for the width parameters treecut width and treedepth. These two parameters have recently gained a lot of attention in the theoretical research community as they offer the algorithmic advantage over treewidth by supporting so-called fixed-parameter algorithms for certain problems that are not fixed-parameter tractable with respect to treewidth. However, the existing research has mostly been theoretical. A main obstacle for any practical or experimental use of these two width parameters is the lack of any practical or implemented algorithm for actually computing the associated decompositions. We address this obstacle by providing the first practical decomposition algorithms. #R##N#Our approach for computing treecut width and treedepth decompositions is based on efficient encodings of these decomposition methods to the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT). Once an encoding is generated, any satisfiability solver can be used to find the decomposition. Moreover, we propose new characterisations for treecut width and treedepth that are based on sequences of partitions of the vertex set, a method that was pioneered for clique-width. We implemented and systematically tested our encodings on various benchmark instances, including famous named graphs and random graphs of various density. It turned out that for the considered width parameters, our partition-based SAT encoding even outperforms the best existing SAT encoding for treewidth.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "parameterized complexity of stable roommates with ties and incomplete lists through the lens of graph parameters"):
  with members:
    - "stable marriage with multi modal preferences"
    - "stable marriage with groups of similar agents"
    - "on treewidth and stable marriage"
    - "how hard is it to satisfy almost all roommates"
    - "the stable roommates problem with short lists"
    - "stable marriage with covering constraints a complete computational trichotomy"
    - "acyclic preference systems in p2p networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)