human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "stable and fair classification"
  Abstract: Fair classification has been a topic of intense study in machine learning, and several algorithms have been proposed towards this important task. However, in a recent study, Friedler et al. observed that fair classification algorithms may not be stable with respect to variations in the training dataset -- a crucial consideration in several real-world applications. Motivated by their work, we study the problem of designing classification algorithms that are both fair and stable. We propose an extended framework based on fair classification algorithms that are formulated as optimization problems, by introducing a stability-focused regularization term. Theoretically, we prove a stability guarantee, that was lacking in fair classification algorithms, and also provide an accuracy guarantee for our extended framework. Our accuracy guarantee can be used to inform the selection of the regularization parameter in our framework. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that combines stability and fairness in automated decision-making tasks. We assess the benefits of our approach empirically by extending several fair classification algorithms that are shown to achieve the best balance between fairness and accuracy over the Adult dataset. Our empirical results show that our framework indeed improves the stability at only a slight sacrifice in accuracy.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fair active learning"):
  with members:
    - "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"
    - "a nutritional label for rankings"
    - "achieving fairness through adversarial learning an application to recidivism prediction"
    - "assessing and remedying coverage for a given dataset"
    - "classification with fairness constraints a meta algorithm with provable guarantees"
    - "a reductions approach to fair classification"
    - "active fairness in algorithmic decision making"
    - "bias disparity in recommendation systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"):
  with members:
    - "debiasing community detection the importance of lowly connected nodes"
    - "50 years of test un fairness lessons for machine learning"
    - "diversity in faces"
    - "on measuring social biases in sentence encoders"
    - "equalizing gender biases in neural machine translation with word embeddings techniques"
    - "fair regression quantitative definitions and reduction based algorithms"
    - "proportionally fair clustering"
    - "a framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fairness warnings and fair maml learning fairly with minimal data"):
  with members:
    - "transfer of machine learning fairness across domains"
    - "assessing the local interpretability of machine learning models"
    - "detecting and correcting for label shift with black box predictors"
    - "learning adversarially fair and transferable representations"
    - "the frontiers of fairness in machine learning"
    - "a convex framework for fair regression"
    - "model agnostic meta learning for fast adaptation of deep networks"
    - "equality of opportunity in supervised learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "fairprep promoting data to a first class citizen in studies on fairness enhancing interventions"):
  with members:
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "ai fairness 360 an extensible toolkit for detecting understanding and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias"
    - "mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning"
    - "on fairness and calibration"
    - "fairness testing testing software for discrimination"
    - "deepxplore automated whitebox testing of deep learning systems"
    - "on the im possibility of fairness"
    - "fairtest discovering unwarranted associations in data driven applications"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)