human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on the complexity of exact pattern matching in graphs determinism and zig zag matching"
  Abstract: Exact pattern matching in labeled graphs is the problem of searching paths of a graph $G=(V,E)$ that spell the same string as the given pattern $P[1..m]$. This basic problem can be found at the heart of more complex operations on variation graphs in computational biology, query operations in graph databases, and analysis of heterogeneous networks, where the nodes of some paths must match a sequence of labels or types. In our recent work we described a conditional lower bound stating that the exact pattern matching problem in labeled graphs cannot be solved in less than quadratic time, namely, $O(|E|^{1 - \epsilon} \, m)$ time or $O(|E| \, m^{1 - \epsilon})$ time for any constant $\epsilon>0$, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) is false. The result holds even if node labels and pattern $P$ are drawn from a binary alphabet, and $G$ is restricted to undirected graphs of maximum degree three or directed acyclic graphs of maximum sum of indegree and outdegree three. It was left open what happens on undirected graphs of maximum degree two, i.e., when the pattern can have a zig-zag match in a (cyclic) bidirectional string. Also, the reduction created a non-determistic directed acyclic graph, and it was left open if determinism would make the problem easier. In this work, we show through the Orthogonal Vectors hypothesis (OV) that the same conditional lower bound holds even for these restricted cases.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the complexity of exact pattern matching in graphs binary strings and bounded degree"):
  with members:
    - "the gremlin graph traversal machine and language invited talk"
    - "a survey of heterogeneous information network analysis"
    - "which regular expression patterns are hard to match"
    - "quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping"
    - "defining and evaluating network communities based on ground truth"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)