human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "estimating gaps in martingales and applications to coin tossing constructions and hardness"
  Abstract: Consider designing a distributed coin-tossing protocol for n processors such that the probability of heads is X0 in [0,1], and an adversary can reset one processor to change the distribution of the final outcome. For X0=1/2, in the non-cryptographic setting, Blum's majority protocol is $\frac1{\sqrt{2\pi n}}$ insecure. For computationally bounded adversaries and any X0 in [0,1], the protocol of Moran,Naor,Segev (2009) is only O(1/n) insecure. In this paper, we study discrete-time martingales (X0,X1,..,Xn) such that Xi in [0,1], for all i in {0,..,n}, and Xn in {0,1}. In particular, for any X0 in [0,1], we construct martingales that yield $\frac12\sqrt{\frac{X_0(1-X_0)}{n}}$ insecure coin-tossing protocols with n-bit communication; irrespective of the number of bits required to represent the output distribution. Note that for sufficiently small X0, we achieve higher security than Moran et al's protocol even against computationally unbounded adversaries. For X0=1/2, our protocol requires only 40% of the processors to obtain the same security as the majority protocol. We introduce a new inductive technique that uses geometric transformations to estimate the large gaps in these martingales. For any X0 in [0,1], we show that there exists a stopping time $T$ such that $\mathbb{E}[|{X_T-X_{T-1}}|]\geq\frac2{\sqrt{2n-1}}\cdot X_0(1-X_0)$. The inductive technique also constructs martingales that demonstrate the optimality of our bound - we construct optimal martingales such that any $T$ has$\mathbb{E}[|{X_T-X_{T-1}}|]\leq\frac1{\sqrt{n}}\cdot\sqrt{X_0(1-X_0)}$. Our lower-bound holds for all X0 in [0,1]; while the previous bound of Cleve,Impagliazzo (1993) exists only for positive constant X0. Our approach only employs elementary techniques and avoids the complex probabilistic tools inherent to the approaches of Cleve,Impagliazzo (1993) and Beimel,Haitner,Makriyannis,Omri (2018).

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)