human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "optimal timing of moving target defense a stackelberg game model"
  Abstract: As an effective approach to thwarting advanced attacks, moving target defense (MTD) has been applied to various domains. Previous works on MTD, however, mainly focus on deciding the sequence of system configurations to be used and have largely ignored the equally important timing problem. Given that both the migration cost and attack time vary over system configurations, it is crucial to jointly optimize the spatial and temporal decisions in MTD to better protect the system from persistent threats. In this work, we propose a Stackelberg game model for MTD where the defender commits to a joint migration and timing strategy to cope with configuration-dependent migration cost and attack time distribution. The defender's problem is formulated as a semi-Markovian decision process and a nearly optimal MTD strategy is derived by exploiting the unique structure of the game.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "spatial temporal moving target defense a markov stackelberg game model"):
  with members:
    - "a survey of moving target defenses for network security"
    - "stackelberg vs nash in security games an extended investigation of interchangeability equivalence and uniqueness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "deep reinforcement learning based adaptive moving target defense"):
  with members:
    - "finding needles in a moving haystack prioritizing alerts with adversarial reinforcement learning"
    - "mathsf qflip an adaptive reinforcement learning strategy for the mathsf flipit security game"
    - "markov decision process to enforce moving target defence policies"
    - "a unified game theoretic approach to multiagent reinforcement learning"
    - "prioritized experience replay"
    - "dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning"
    - "deep reinforcement learning with double q learning"
    - "playing atari with deep reinforcement learning"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)