human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "private aggregation from fewer anonymous messages"
  Abstract: Consider the setup where $n$ parties are each given a number $x_i \in \mathbb{F}_q$ and the goal is to compute the sum $\sum_i x_i$ in a secure fashion and with as little communication as possible. We study this problem in the anonymized model of Ishai et al. (FOCS 2006) where each party may broadcast anonymous messages on an insecure channel. #R##N#We present a new analysis of the one-round ``split and mix'' protocol of Ishai et al. In order to achieve the same security parameter, our analysis reduces the required number of messages by a $\Theta(\log n)$ multiplicative factor. We complement our positive result with lower bounds showing that the dependence of the number of messages on the domain size, the number of parties, and the security parameter is essentially tight. #R##N#Using a reduction of Balle et al. (2019), our improved analysis of the protocol of Ishai et al. yields, in the same model, an $\left(\varepsilon, \delta\right)$-differentially private protocol for aggregation that, for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$ and any $\delta = \frac{1}{\mathrm{poly}(n)}$, incurs only a constant error and requires only a constant number of messages per party. Previously, such a protocol was known only for $\Omega(\log n)$ messages per party.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages"):
  with members:
    - "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"
    - "improved summation from shuffling"
    - "separating local shuffled differential privacy via histograms"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "federated learning strategies for improving communication efficiency"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "private summation in the multi message shuffle model"):
  with members:
    - "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "manipulation attacks in local differential privacy"
    - "distributed differential privacy via shuffling"
    - "prochlo strong privacy for analytics in the crowd"
    - "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis"
    - "what can we learn privately"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"):
  with members:
    - "improved summation from shuffling"
    - "separating local shuffled differential privacy via histograms"
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "practical and robust privacy amplification with multi party differential privacy"
    - "communication complexity in locally private distribution estimation and heavy hitters"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"):
  with members:
    - "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "distributed differential privacy via shuffling"
    - "prochlo strong privacy for analytics in the crowd"
    - "communication efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data"
    - "sketching as a tool for numerical linear algebra"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)