human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "olmpics on what language model pre training captures"
  Abstract: Recent success of pre-trained language models (LMs) has spurred widespread interest in the language capabilities that they possess. However, efforts to understand whether LM representations are useful for symbolic reasoning tasks have been limited and scattered. In this work, we propose eight reasoning tasks, which conceptually require operations such as comparison, conjunction, and composition. A fundamental challenge is to understand whether the performance of a LM on a task should be attributed to the pre-trained representations or to the process of fine-tuning on the task data. To address this, we propose an evaluation protocol that includes both zero-shot evaluation (no fine-tuning), as well as comparing the learning curve of a fine-tuned LM to the learning curve of multiple controls, which paints a rich picture of the LM capabilities. Our main findings are that: (a) different LMs exhibit qualitatively different reasoning abilities, e.g., RoBERTa succeeds in reasoning tasks where BERT fails completely; (b) LMs do not reason in an abstract manner and are context-dependent, e.g., while RoBERTa can compare ages, it can do so only when the ages are in the typical range of human ages; (c) On half of our reasoning tasks all models fail completely. Our findings and infrastructure can help future work on designing new datasets, models and objective functions for pre-training.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "k adapter infusing knowledge into pre trained models with adapters"):
  with members:
    - "pretrained encyclopedia weakly supervised knowledge pretrained language model"
    - "exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text to text transformer"
    - "kepler a unified model for knowledge embedding and pre trained language representation"
    - "language models as knowledge bases"
    - "parameter efficient transfer learning for nlp"
    - "bert is not a knowledge base yet factual knowledge vs name based reasoning in unsupervised qa"
    - "informing unsupervised pretraining with external linguistic knowledge"
    - "matching the blanks distributional similarity for relation learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "how much knowledge can you pack into the parameters of a language model"):
  with members:
    - "realm retrieval augmented language model pre training"
    - "boolq exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes no questions"
    - "exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text to text transformer"
    - "language models as knowledge bases"
    - "latent retrieval for weakly supervised open domain question answering"
    - "knowledge guided text retrieval and reading for open domain question answering"
    - "how can we know what language models know"
    - "frustratingly easy natural question answering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "codebert a pre trained model for programming and natural languages"):
  with members:
    - "exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text to text transformer"
    - "language models as knowledge bases"
    - "pre trained contextual embedding of source code"
    - "codesearchnet challenge evaluating the state of semantic code search"
    - "vilbert pretraining task agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision and language tasks"
    - "videobert a joint model for video and language representation learning"
    - "how multilingual is multilingual bert"
    - "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)