human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "misleading failures of partial input baselines"
  Abstract: Recent work establishes dataset difficulty and removes annotation artifacts via partial-input baselines (e.g., hypothesis-only models for SNLI or question-only models for VQA). When a partial-input baseline gets high accuracy, a dataset is cheatable. However, the converse is not necessarily true: the failure of a partial-input baseline does not mean a dataset is free of artifacts. To illustrate this, we first design artificial datasets which contain trivial patterns in the full input that are undetectable by any partial-input model. Next, we identify such artifacts in the SNLI dataset - a hypothesis-only model augmented with trivial patterns in the premise can solve 15% of the examples that are previously considered "hard". Our work provides a caveat for the use of partial-input baselines for dataset verification and creation.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "unshuffling data for improved generalization"):
  with members:
    - "lxmert learning cross modality encoder representations from transformers"
    - "uniter learning universal image text representations"
    - "quantifying and alleviating the language prior problem in visual question answering"
    - "don t take the easy way out ensemble based methods for avoiding known dataset biases"
    - "adversarial regularization for visual question answering strengths shortcomings and side effects"
    - "unicoder vl a universal encoder for vision and language by cross modal pre training"
    - "simple but effective techniques to reduce biases"
    - "rubi reducing unimodal biases in visual question answering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "don t take the easy way out ensemble based methods for avoiding known dataset biases"):
  with members:
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "probing the need for visual context in multimodal machine translation"
    - "compositional questions do not necessitate multi hop reasoning"
    - "adversarial regularization for visual question answering strengths shortcomings and side effects"
    - "understanding dataset design choices for multi hop reasoning"
    - "unlearn dataset bias in natural language inference by fitting the residual"
    - "on adversarial removal of hypothesis only bias in natural language inference"
    - "robust machine comprehension models via adversarial training"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "what does my qa model know devising controlled probes using expert knowledge"):
  with members:
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "overcoming catastrophic forgetting by neuron level plasticity control"
    - "abductive commonsense reasoning"
    - "inoculation by fine tuning a method for analyzing challenge datasets"
    - "from f to a on the n y regents science exams an overview of the aristo project"
    - "diversify your datasets analyzing generalization via controlled variance in adversarial datasets"
    - "qasc a dataset for question answering via sentence composition"
    - "wic the word in context dataset for evaluating context sensitive meaning representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "why can t memory networks read effectively"):
  with members:
    - "understanding dataset design choices for multi hop reasoning"
    - "blindfold baselines for embodied qa"
    - "compositional attention networks for machine reasoning"
    - "qanet combining local convolution with global self attention for reading comprehension"
    - "clicr a dataset of clinical case reports for machine reading comprehension"
    - "how much reading does reading comprehension require a critical investigation of popular benchmarks"
    - "question answering on knowledge bases and text using universal schema and memory networks"
    - "constructing datasets for multi hop reading comprehension across documents"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)