human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a deterministic linear program solver in current matrix multiplication time"
  Abstract: Interior point algorithms for solving linear programs have been studied extensively for a long time [e.g. Karmarkar 1984; Lee, Sidford FOCS'14; Cohen, Lee, Song STOC'19]. For linear programs of the form $\min_{Ax=b, x \ge 0} c^\top x$ with $n$ variables and $d$ constraints, the generic case $d = \Omega(n)$ has recently been settled by Cohen, Lee and Song [STOC'19]. Their algorithm can solve linear programs in $\tilde O(n^\omega \log(n/\delta))$ expected time, where $\delta$ is the relative accuracy. This is essentially optimal as all known linear system solvers require up to $O(n^{\omega})$ time for solving $Ax = b$. However, for the case of deterministic solvers, the best upper bound is Vaidya's 30 years old $O(n^{2.5} \log(n/\delta))$ bound [FOCS'89]. In this paper we show that one can also settle the deterministic setting by derandomizing Cohen et al.'s $\tilde{O}(n^\omega \log(n/\delta))$ time algorithm. This allows for a strict $\tilde{O}(n^\omega \log(n/\delta))$ time bound, instead of an expected one, and a simplified analysis, reducing the length of their proof of their central path method by roughly half. Derandomizing this algorithm was also an open question asked in Song's PhD Thesis. #R##N#The main tool to achieve our result is a new data-structure that can maintain the solution to a linear system in subquadratic time. More accurately we are able to maintain $\sqrt{U}A^\top(AUA^\top)^{-1}A\sqrt{U}\:v$ in subquadratic time under $\ell_2$ multiplicative changes to the diagonal matrix $U$ and the vector $v$. This type of change is common for interior point algorithms. Previous algorithms [e.g. Vaidya STOC'89; Lee, Sidford FOCS'15; Cohen, Lee, Song STOC'19] required $\Omega(n^2)$ time for this task. [...]

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "solving tall dense linear programs in nearly linear time"):
  with members:
    - "solving empirical risk minimization in the current matrix multiplication time"
    - "dynamic matrix inverse improved algorithms and matching conditional lower bounds"
    - "dynamic streaming spectral sparsification in nearly linear time and space"
    - "fully dynamic spectral vertex sparsifiers and applications"
    - "solving linear programs in the current matrix multiplication time"
    - "relative error tensor low rank approximation"
    - "improved rectangular matrix multiplication using powers of the coppersmith winograd tensor"
    - "optimality of the johnson lindenstrauss lemma"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "optimal sketching for kronecker product regression and low rank approximation"):
  with members:
    - "solving empirical risk minimization in the current matrix multiplication time"
    - "almost optimal tensor sketch"
    - "oblivious sketching of high degree polynomial kernels"
    - "tight bounds for ell_p oblivious subspace embeddings"
    - "solving linear programs in the current matrix multiplication time"
    - "towards a zero one law for entrywise low rank approximation"
    - "sublinear time low rank approximation of distance matrices"
    - "relative error tensor low rank approximation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "dynamic matrix inverse improved algorithms and matching conditional lower bounds"):
  with members:
    - "dynamic approximate shortest paths and beyond subquadratic and worst case update time"
    - "sensitive distance and reachability oracles for large batch updates"
    - "solving linear programs in the current matrix multiplication time"
    - "online bipartite matching with amortized o log 2 n replacements"
    - "tight cell probe bounds for succinct boolean matrix vector multiplication"
    - "improved rectangular matrix multiplication using powers of the coppersmith winograd tensor"
    - "dynamic minimum spanning forest with subpolynomial worst case update time"
    - "fully dynamic minimum spanning forest with improved worst case update time"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)