human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "image difficulty curriculum for generative adversarial networks cugan"
  Abstract: Despite the significant advances in recent years, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are still notoriously hard to train. In this paper, we propose three novel curriculum learning strategies for training GANs. All strategies are first based on ranking the training images by their difficulty scores, which are estimated by a state-of-the-art image difficulty predictor. Our first strategy is to divide images into gradually more difficult batches. Our second strategy introduces a novel curriculum loss function for the discriminator that takes into account the difficulty scores of the real images. Our third strategy is based on sampling from an evolving distribution, which favors the easier images during the initial training stages and gradually converges to a uniform distribution, in which samples are equally likely, regardless of difficulty. We compare our curriculum learning strategies with the classic training procedure on two tasks: image generation and image translation. Our experiments indicate that all strategies provide faster convergence and superior results. For example, our best curriculum learning strategy applied on spectrally normalized GANs (SNGANs) fooled human annotators in thinking that generated CIFAR-like images are real in 25.0% of the presented cases, while the SNGANs trained using the classic procedure fooled the annotators in only 18.4% cases. Similarly, in image translation, the human annotators preferred the images produced by the Cycle-consistent GAN (CycleGAN) trained using curriculum learning in 40.5% cases and those produced by CycleGAN based on classic training in only 19.8% cases, $39.7\%$ cases being labeled as ties.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "low budget unsupervised label query through domain alignment enforcement"):
  with members:
    - "self supervised learning with geometric constraints in monocular video connecting flow depth and camera"
    - "unsupervised domain adaptation via regularized conditional alignment"
    - "confidence regularized self training"
    - "beyond sharing weights for deep domain adaptation"
    - "domain generalization by solving jigsaw puzzles"
    - "consistency based semi supervised active learning towards minimizing labeling budget"
    - "self paced deep learning for weakly supervised object detection"
    - "unsupervised domain adaptation through self supervision"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "curriculum learning strategies for ir an empirical study on conversation response ranking"):
  with members:
    - "bert with history answer embedding for conversational question answering"
    - "passage re ranking with bert"
    - "introducing mantis a novel multi domain information seeking dialogues dataset"
    - "faq retrieval using query question similarity and bert based query answer relevance"
    - "on the power of curriculum learning in training deep networks"
    - "simple applications of bert for ad hoc document retrieval"
    - "a hybrid retrieval generation neural conversation model"
    - "critically examining the neural hype weak baselines and the additivity of effectiveness gains from neural ranking models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "curriculum self paced learning for cross domain object detection"):
  with members:
    - "a robust learning approach to domain adaptive object detection"
    - "beyond sharing weights for deep domain adaptation"
    - "adversarial discriminative domain adaptation"
    - "multiple instance curriculum learning for weakly supervised object detection"
    - "unpaired image to image translation using cycle consistent adversarial networks"
    - "the cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding"
    - "unsupervised visual representation learning by context prediction"
    - "deep residual learning for image recognition"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)