human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "graph clustering in all parameter regimes"
  Abstract: Resolution parameters in graph clustering represent a size and quality trade-off. We address the task of efficiently solving a parameterized graph clustering objective for all values of a resolution parameter. Specifically, we consider an objective we call LambdaPrime, involving a parameter $\lambda \in (0,1)$. This objective is related to other parameterized clustering problems, such as parametric generalizations of modularity, and captures a number of specific clustering problems as special cases, including sparsest cut and cluster deletion. While previous work provides approximation results for a single resolution parameter, we seek a set of approximately optimal clusterings for all values of $\lambda$ in polynomial time. In particular, we ask the question, how small a family of clusterings suffices to optimize -- or to approximately optimize -- the LambdaPrime objective over the full possible spectrum of $\lambda$? #R##N#We obtain a family of logarithmically many clusterings by solving the parametric linear programming relaxation of LambdaPrime at a logarithmic number of parameter values, and round their solutions using existing approximation algorithms. We prove that this number is tight up to a constant factor. Specifically, for a certain class of ring graphs, a logarithmic number of feasible solutions is required to provide a constant-factor approximation for the LambdaPrime LP relaxation in all parameter regimes. We additionally show that for any graph with $n$ nodes and $m$ edges, there exists a set of $m$ or fewer clusterings such that for every $\lambda \in (0,1)$, the family contains an exact solution to the LambdaPrime objective. There also exists a set of $O(\log n)$ clusterings that provide a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution in all parameter regimes; we demonstrate simple graph classes for which these bounds are tight.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)