human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "atmpa attacking machine learning based malware visualization detection methods via adversarial examples"
  Abstract: Since the threat of malicious software (malware) has become increasingly serious, automatic malware detection techniques have received increasing attention, where machine learning (ML)-based visualization detection methods become more and more popular. In this paper, we demonstrate that the state-of-the-art ML-based visualization detection methods are vulnerable to Adversarial Example (AE) attacks. We develop a novel Adversarial Texture Malware Perturbation Attack (ATMPA) method based on the gradient descent and L-norm optimization method, where attackers can introduce some tiny perturbations on the transformed dataset such that ML-based malware detection methods will completely fail. The experimental results on the MS BIG malware dataset show that a small interference can reduce the accuracy rate down to 0% for several ML-based detection methods, and the rate of transferability is 74.1% on average.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "automatic generation of adversarial examples for interpreting malware classifiers"):
  with members:
    - "understanding the efficacy reliability and resiliency of computer vision techniques for malware detection and future research directions"
    - "on defending against label flipping attacks on malware detection systems"
    - "adversarial samples on android malware detection systems for iot systems"
    - "copycat practical adversarial attacks on visualization based malware detection"
    - "generation evaluation of adversarial examples for malware obfuscation"
    - "examining adversarial learning against graph based iot malware detection systems"
    - "explaining vulnerabilities of deep learning to adversarial malware binaries"
    - "easy to fool testing the anti evasion capabilities of pdf malware scanners"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "adversarial examples opportunities and challenges"):
  with members:
    - "one pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks"
    - "hcic hardware assisted control flow integrity checking"
    - "adversarial examples versus cloud based detectors a black box empirical study"
    - "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning"
    - "the malicious use of artificial intelligence forecasting prevention and mitigation"
    - "adversarial attacks against medical deep learning systems"
    - "targeted adversarial examples for black box audio systems"
    - "adversarial patch"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "copycat practical adversarial attacks on visualization based malware detection"):
  with members:
    - "detecting and classifying android malware using static analysis along with creator information"
    - "adversarial deep learning for robust detection of binary encoded malware"
    - "deceiving end to end deep learning malware detectors using adversarial examples"
    - "microsoft malware classification challenge"
    - "adversarial malware binaries evading deep learning for malware detection in executables"
    - "lightweight classification of iot malware based on image recognition"
    - "technical report on the cleverhans v2 1 0 adversarial examples library"
    - "practical black box attacks against machine learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "computer systems have 99 problems let s not make machine learning another one"):
  with members:
    - "a context aware framework for detecting sensor based threats on smart devices"
    - "copycat practical adversarial attacks on visualization based malware detection"
    - "robust physical world attacks on deep learning models"
    - "mxnet a flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems"
    - "malicious behavior detection using windows audit logs"
    - "a survey on deep packet inspection for intrusion detection systems"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)