human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "sharp bounds on the runtime of the 1 1 ea via drift analysis and analytic combinatorial tools"
  Abstract: The expected running time of the classical (1+1) EA on the OneMax benchmark function has recently been determined by Hwang et al. (2018) up to additive errors of $O((\log n)/n)$. The same approach proposed there also leads to a full asymptotic expansion with errors of the form $O(n^{-K}\log n)$ for any $K>0$. This precise result is obtained by matched asymptotics with rigorous error analysis (or by solving asymptotically the underlying recurrences via inductive approximation arguments), ideas radically different from well-established techniques for the running time analysis of evolutionary computation such as drift analysis. This paper revisits drift analysis for the (1+1) EA on OneMax and obtains that the expected running time $E(T)$, starting from $\lceil n/2\rceil$ one-bits, is determined by the sum of inverse drifts up to logarithmic error terms, more precisely $$\sum_{k=1}^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}\frac{1}{\Delta(k)} - c_1\log n \le E(T) \le \sum_{k=1}^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}\frac{1}{\Delta(k)} - c_2\log n,$$ where $\Delta(k)$ is the drift (expected increase of the number of one-bits from the state of $n-k$ ones) and $c_1,c_2 >0$ are explicitly computed constants. This improves the previous asymptotic error known for the sum of inverse drifts from $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ to a logarithmic error and gives for the first time a non-asymptotic error bound. Using standard asymptotic techniques, the difference between $E(T)$ and the sum of inverse drifts is found to be $(e/2)\log n+O(1)$.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "precise runtime analysis for plateaus"):
  with members:
    - "theory of parameter control for discrete black box optimization provable performance gains through dynamic parameter choices"
    - "a tight runtime analysis for the cga on jump functions edas can cross fitness valleys at no extra cost"
    - "multiplicative up drift"
    - "an exponential lower bound for the runtime of the compact genetic algorithm on jump functions"
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"
    - "fast genetic algorithms"
    - "level based analysis of genetic algorithms and other search processes"
    - "unbiased black box complexities of jump functions"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)