human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "do massively pretrained language models make better storytellers"
  Abstract: Large neural language models trained on massive amounts of text have emerged as a formidable strategy for Natural Language Understanding tasks. However, the strength of these models as Natural Language Generators is less clear. Though anecdotal evidence suggests that these models generate better quality text, there has been no detailed study characterizing their generation abilities. In this work, we compare the performance of an extensively pretrained model, OpenAI GPT2-117 (Radford et al., 2019), to a state-of-the-art neural story generation model (Fan et al., 2018). By evaluating the generated text across a wide variety of automatic metrics, we characterize the ways in which pretrained models do, and do not, make better storytellers. We find that although GPT2-117 conditions more strongly on context, is more sensitive to ordering of events, and uses more unusual words, it is just as likely to produce repetitive and under-diverse text when using likelihood-maximizing decoding algorithms.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "an empirical investigation of pre trained transformer language models for open domain dialogue generation"):
  with members:
    - "towards a human like open domain chatbot"
    - "a neural topical expansion framework for unstructured persona oriented dialogue generation"
    - "empgan multi resolution interactive empathetic dialogue generation"
    - "a pre training based personalized dialogue generation model with persona sparse data"
    - "fine grained sentence functions for short text conversation"
    - "the curious case of neural text degeneration"
    - "a discrete cvae for response generation on short text conversation"
    - "dialogpt large scale generative pre training for conversational response generation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a knowledge enhanced pretraining model for commonsense story generation"):
  with members:
    - "transfertransfo a transfer learning approach for neural network based conversational agents"
    - "fine tuning pre trained transformer language models to distantly supervised relation extraction"
    - "long and diverse text generation with planning based hierarchical variational model"
    - "the curious case of neural text degeneration"
    - "pretraining methods for dialog context representation learning"
    - "ernie enhanced representation through knowledge integration"
    - "mass masked sequence to sequence pre training for language generation"
    - "strategies for structuring story generation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "unsupervised pre training for natural language generation a literature review"):
  with members:
    - "language models as knowledge bases"
    - "denoising based sequence to sequence pre training for text generation"
    - "pre trained language model representations for language generation"
    - "mask predict parallel decoding of conditional masked language models"
    - "mass masked sequence to sequence pre training for language generation"
    - "encoder agnostic adaptation for conditional language generation"
    - "vilbert pretraining task agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision and language tasks"
    - "albert a lite bert for self supervised learning of language representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "human and automatic detection of generated text"):
  with members:
    - "the curious case of neural text degeneration"
    - "bertscore evaluating text generation with bert"
    - "real or fake learning to discriminate machine from human generated text"
    - "release strategies and the social impacts of language models"
    - "gltr statistical detection and visualization of generated text"
    - "defending against neural fake news"
    - "are we safe yet the limitations of distributional features for fake news detection"
    - "generating sentiment preserving fake online reviews using neural language models and their human and machine based detection"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)