human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "prediction poisoning utility constrained defenses against model stealing attacks"
  Abstract: With the advances of ML models in recent years, we are seeing an increasing number of real-world commercial applications and services e.g., autonomous vehicles, medical equipment, web APIs emerge. Recent advances in model functionality stealing attacks via black-box access (i.e., inputs in, predictions out) threaten the business model of such ML applications, which require a lot of time, money, and effort to develop. In this paper, we address the issue by studying defenses for model stealing attacks, largely motivated by a lack of effective defenses in literature. We work towards the first defense which introduces targeted perturbations to the model predictions under a utility constraint. Our approach introduces the perturbations targeted towards manipulating the training procedure of the attacker. We evaluate our approach on multiple datasets and attack scenarios across a range of utility constrains. Our results show that it is indeed possible to trade-off utility (e.g., deviation from original prediction, test accuracy) to significantly reduce effectiveness of model stealing attacks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "thieves on sesame street model extraction of bert based apis"):
  with members:
    - "boolq exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes no questions"
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "high fidelity extraction of neural network models"
    - "zero shot knowledge transfer via adversarial belief matching"
    - "learning and evaluating general linguistic intelligence"
    - "a framework for the extraction of deep neural networks by leveraging public data"
    - "membership inference attacks on sequence to sequence models"
    - "dawn dynamic adversarial watermarking of neural networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)