human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "practical newton type distributed learning using gradient based approximations"
  Abstract: We study distributed algorithms for expected loss minimization where the datasets are large and have to be stored on different machines. Often we deal with minimizing the average of a set of convex functions where each function is the empirical risk of the corresponding part of the data. In the distributed setting where the individual data instances can be accessed only on the local machines, there would be a series of rounds of local computations followed by some communication among the machines. Since the cost of the communication is usually higher than the local machine computations, it is important to reduce it as much as possible. However, we should not allow this to make the computation too expensive to become a burden in practice. Using second-order methods could make the algorithms converge faster and decrease the amount of communication needed. There are some successful attempts in developing distributed second-order methods. Although these methods have shown fast convergence, their local computation is expensive and could enjoy more improvement for practical uses. In this study we modify an existing approach, DANE (Distributed Approximate NEwton), in order to improve the computational cost while maintaining the accuracy. We tackle this problem by using iterative methods for solving the local subproblems approximately instead of providing exact solutions for each round of communication. We study how using different iterative methods affect the behavior of the algorithm and try to provide an appropriate tradeoff between the amount of local computation and the required amount of communication. We demonstrate the practicality of our algorithm and compare it to the existing distributed gradient based methods such as SGD.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)