human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "implicit regularization of normalization methods"
  Abstract: Normalization methods such as batch normalization are commonly used in overparametrized models like neural networks. Here, we study the weight normalization (WN) method (Salimans & Kingma, 2016) and a variant called reparametrized projected gradient descent (rPGD) for overparametrized least squares regression and some more general loss functions. WN and rPGD reparametrize the weights with a scale $g$ and a unit vector such that the objective function becomes \emph{non-convex}. We show that this non-convex formulation has beneficial regularization effects compared to gradient descent on the original objective. We show that these methods adaptively regularize the weights and \emph{converge with exponential rate} to the minimum $\ell_2$ norm solution (or close to it) even for initializations \emph{far from zero}. This is different from the behavior of gradient descent, which only converges to the min norm solution when started at zero, and is more sensitive to initialization. Some of our proof techniques are different from many related works; for instance we find explicit invariants along the gradient flow paths. We verify our results experimentally and suggest that there may be a similar phenomenon for nonlinear problems such as matrix sensing.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "unique properties of wide minima in deep networks"):
  with members:
    - "a tail index analysis of stochastic gradient noise in deep neural networks"
    - "gradient descent maximizes the margin of homogeneous neural networks"
    - "on the optimization of deep networks implicit acceleration by overparameterization"
    - "implicit bias of gradient descent on linear convolutional networks"
    - "gradient descent aligns the layers of deep linear networks"
    - "step size matters in deep learning"
    - "algorithmic regularization in learning deep homogeneous models layers are automatically balanced"
    - "three factors influencing minima in sgd"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)