human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "pareto optimal data compression for binary classification tasks"
  Abstract: The goal of lossy data compression is to reduce the storage cost of a data set $X$ while retaining as much information as possible about something ($Y$) that you care about. For example, what aspects of an image $X$ contain the most information about whether it depicts a cat? Mathematically, this corresponds to finding a mapping $X\to Z\equiv f(X)$ that maximizes the mutual information $I(Z,Y)$ while the entropy $H(Z)$ is kept below some fixed threshold. We present a method for mapping out the Pareto frontier for classification tasks, reflecting the tradeoff between retained entropy and class information. We first show how a random variable $X$ (an image, say) drawn from a class $Y\in\{1,...,n\}$ can be distilled into a vector $W=f(X)\in \mathbb{R}^{n-1}$ losslessly, so that $I(W,Y)=I(X,Y)$; for example, for a binary classification task of cats and dogs, each image $X$ is mapped into a single real number $W$ retaining all information that helps distinguish cats from dogs. For the $n=2$ case of binary classification, we then show how $W$ can be further compressed into a discrete variable $Z=g_\beta(W)\in\{1,...,m_\beta\}$ by binning $W$ into $m_\beta$ bins, in such a way that varying the parameter $\beta$ sweeps out the full Pareto frontier, solving a generalization of the Discrete Information Bottleneck (DIB) problem. We argue that the most interesting points on this frontier are "corners" maximizing $I(Z,Y)$ for a fixed number of bins $m=2,3...$ which can be conveniently be found without multiobjective optimization. We apply this method to the CIFAR-10, MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets, illustrating how it can be interpreted as an information-theoretically optimal image clustering algorithm.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "intelligence physics and information the tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity in machine learning"):
  with members:
    - "learning representations for neural network based classification using the information bottleneck principle"
    - "dynamics aware unsupervised discovery of skills"
    - "causal confusion in imitation learning"
    - "unsupervised discovery of temporal structure in noisy data with dynamical components analysis"
    - "learnability for the information bottleneck"
    - "relational neural expectation maximization unsupervised discovery of objects and their interactions"
    - "the conditional entropy bottleneck"
    - "the dynamics of differential learning i information dynamics and task reachability"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "phase transitions for the information bottleneck in representation learning"):
  with members:
    - "dynamics aware unsupervised discovery of skills"
    - "learnability for the information bottleneck"
    - "the conditional entropy bottleneck"
    - "the dynamics of differential learning i information dynamics and task reachability"
    - "autoaugment learning augmentation policies from data"
    - "variational discriminator bottleneck improving imitation learning inverse rl and gans by constraining information flow"
    - "emergence of invariance and disentanglement in deep representations"
    - "deep variational information bottleneck"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "storage space allocation strategy for digital data with message importance"):
  with members:
    - "matching users preference under target revenue constraints in data recommendation systems"
    - "importance of small probability events in big data information measures applications and challenges"
    - "learning convolutional networks for content weighted image compression"
    - "lossy compression for compute and forward in limited backhaul uplink multicell processing"
    - "message importance measure and its application to minority subset detection in big data"
    - "renyi divergence and kullback leibler divergence"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)