human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
  Abstract: A machine learning system can score well on a given test set by relying on heuristics that are effective for frequent example types but break down in more challenging cases. We study this issue within natural language inference (NLI), the task of determining whether one sentence entails another. We hypothesize that statistical NLI models may adopt three fallible syntactic heuristics: the lexical overlap heuristic, the subsequence heuristic, and the constituent heuristic. To determine whether models have adopted these heuristics, we introduce a controlled evaluation set called HANS (Heuristic Analysis for NLI Systems), which contains many examples where the heuristics fail. We find that models trained on MNLI, including BERT, a state-of-the-art model, perform very poorly on HANS, suggesting that they have indeed adopted these heuristics. We conclude that there is substantial room for improvement in NLI systems, and that the HANS dataset can motivate and measure progress in this area

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial filters of dataset biases"):
  with members:
    - "dataset distillation"
    - "hellaswag can a machine really finish your sentence"
    - "inoculation by fine tuning a method for analyzing challenge datasets"
    - "repair removing representation bias by dataset resampling"
    - "stochastic beams and where to find them the gumbel top k trick for sampling sequences without replacement"
    - "natural adversarial examples"
    - "randaugment practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space"
    - "randaugment practical data augmentation with no separate search"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a framework for evaluation of machine reading comprehension gold standards"):
  with members:
    - "commonsense reasoning for natural language understanding a survey of benchmarks resources and approaches"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "quick and not so dirty unsupervised selection of justification sentences for multi hop question answering"
    - "compositional questions do not necessitate multi hop reasoning"
    - "question answering is a format when is it useful"
    - "understanding dataset design choices for multi hop reasoning"
    - "show your work improved reporting of experimental results"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "domain adaptation with conditional distribution matching and generalized label shift"):
  with members:
    - "domain agnostic learning with disentangled representations"
    - "robust natural language inference models with example forgetting"
    - "batch weight for domain adaptation with mass shift"
    - "learning to transfer examples for partial domain adaptation"
    - "learning representations by maximizing mutual information across views"
    - "regularized learning for domain adaptation under label shifts"
    - "on learning invariant representation for domain adaptation"
    - "multi source domain adaptation with mixture of experts"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "cnns found to jump around more skillfully than rnns compositional generalization in seq2seq convolutional networks"
    - "measuring compositionality in representation learning"
    - "the emergence of number and syntax units in lstm language models"
    - "what do rnn language models learn about filler gap dependencies"
    - "on adversarial examples for character level neural machine translation"
    - "distinct patterns of syntactic agreement errors in recurrent networks and humans"
    - "jump to better conclusions scan both left and right"
    - "deep learning a critical appraisal"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a hierarchy of limitations in machine learning"):
  with members:
    - "case study predictive fairness to reduce misdemeanor recidivism through social service interventions"
    - "the hidden assumptions behind counterfactual explanations and principal reasons"
    - "the human body is a black box supporting clinical decision making with deep learning"
    - "an open source automl benchmark"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "roles for computing in social change"
    - "garbage in garbage out do machine learning application papers in social computing report where human labeled training data comes from"
    - "show your work improved reporting of experimental results"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adversarial nli a new benchmark for natural language understanding"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial filters of dataset biases"
    - "hellaswag can a machine really finish your sentence"
    - "abductive commonsense reasoning"
    - "codah an adversarially authored question answer dataset for common sense"
    - "do neural dialog systems use the conversation history effectively an empirical study"
    - "multi task deep neural networks for natural language understanding"
    - "are we modeling the task or the annotator an investigation of annotator bias in natural language understanding datasets"
    - "no training required exploring random encoders for sentence classification"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "don t take the easy way out ensemble based methods for avoiding known dataset biases"):
  with members:
    - "probing the need for visual context in multimodal machine translation"
    - "compositional questions do not necessitate multi hop reasoning"
    - "adversarial regularization for visual question answering strengths shortcomings and side effects"
    - "understanding dataset design choices for multi hop reasoning"
    - "unlearn dataset bias in natural language inference by fitting the residual"
    - "misleading failures of partial input baselines"
    - "on adversarial removal of hypothesis only bias in natural language inference"
    - "robust machine comprehension models via adversarial training"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "superglue a stickier benchmark for general purpose language understanding systems"):
  with members:
    - "boolq exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes no questions"
    - "paws paraphrase adversaries from word scrambling"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "a surprisingly robust trick for the winograd schema challenge"
    - "multi task deep neural networks for natural language understanding"
    - "improving multi task deep neural networks via knowledge distillation for natural language understanding"
    - "human vs muppet a conservative estimate of human performance on the glue benchmark"
    - "lipstick on a pig debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)