human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "neural text generation from rich semantic representations"
  Abstract: We propose neural models to generate high-quality text from structured representations based on Minimal Recursion Semantics (MRS). MRS is a rich semantic representation that encodes more precise semantic detail than other representations such as Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR). We show that a sequence-to-sequence model that maps a linearization of Dependency MRS, a graph-based representation of MRS, to English text can achieve a BLEU score of 66.11 when trained on gold data. The performance can be improved further using a high-precision, broad coverage grammar-based parser to generate a large silver training corpus, achieving a final BLEU score of 77.17 on the full test set, and 83.37 on the subset of test data most closely matching the silver data domain. Our results suggest that MRS-based representations are a good choice for applications that need both structured semantics and the ability to produce natural language text as output.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "designing a symbolic intermediate representation for neural surface realization"):
  with members:
    - "universal dependency parsing from scratch"
    - "strategies for structuring story generation"
    - "evaluating the state of the art of end to end natural language generation the e2e nlg challenge"
    - "generating high quality surface realizations using data augmentation and factored sequence models"
    - "human vs automatic metrics on the importance of correlation design"
    - "decoupling strategy and generation in negotiation dialogues"
    - "data to text generation with content selection and planning"
    - "survey of the state of the art in natural language generation core tasks applications and evaluation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "amr normalization for fairer evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "neural semantic parsing by character based translation experiments with abstract meaning representations"
    - "neural amr sequence to sequence models for parsing and generation"
    - "an incremental parser for abstract meaning representation"
    - "riga at semeval 2016 task 8 impact of smatch extensions and character level neural translation on amr parsing accuracy"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)