human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "taal tampering attack on any key based logic locked circuits"
  Abstract: Due to the globalization of semiconductor manufacturing and test processes, the system-on-a-chip (SoC) designers no longer design the complete SoC and manufacture chips on their own. This outsourcing of design and manufacturing of Integrated Circuits (ICs) has resulted in a number of threats, such as overproduction of ICs, sale of out-of-specification/rejected ICs, and piracy of Intellectual Properties (IPs). Logic locking has emerged as a promising defense strategy against the afore-mentioned threats. However, various attacks pertaining to the extraction of secret keys have undermined the security of logic locking techniques. Over the years, researchers have proposed different techniques to prevent the existing attacks. In this paper, we propose a novel attack which can break any logic locking techniques that relies on stored secret key. This proposed TAAL attack is based on implanting a hardware Trojan in the netlist, which leaks the secret key to an adversary once activated. As an untrusted foundry has the capability to extract the netlist of a design from the layout/mask information, it is feasible for a malicious foundry to implement such a hardware Trojan. All of the three types of TAAL attacks can be used for extracting secret keys. We have introduced the models for both the combinational and sequential hardware Trojans that evade manufacturing tests as well. An adversary only needs to choose one hardware Trojan out of a large set of all possible Trojans to launch the TAAL attack.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "defense in depth a recipe for logic locking to prevail"):
  with members:
    - "functional analysis attacks on logic locking"
    - "threats on logic locking a decade later"
    - "sail machine learning guided structural analysis attack on hardware obfuscation"
    - "logic locking for secure outsourced chip fabrication a new attack and provably secure defense mechanism"
    - "physical design obfuscation of hardware a comprehensive investigation of device and logic level techniques"
    - "threshold based obfuscated keys with quantifiable security against invasive readout"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)