human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a grounded interaction protocol for explainable artificial intelligence"
  Abstract: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) systems need to include an explanation model to communicate the internal decisions, behaviours and actions to the interacting humans. Successful explanation involves both cognitive and social processes. In this paper we focus on the challenge of meaningful interaction between an explainer and an explainee and investigate the structural aspects of an interactive explanation to propose an interaction protocol. We follow a bottom-up approach to derive the model by analysing transcripts of different explanation dialogue types with 398 explanation dialogues. We use grounded theory to code and identify key components of an explanation dialogue. We formalize the model using the agent dialogue framework (ADF) as a new dialogue type and then evaluate it in a human-agent interaction study with 101 dialogues from 14 participants. Our results show that the proposed model can closely follow the explanation dialogues of human-agent conversations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences"):
  with members:
    - "explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations"
    - "personalized explanation in machine learning"
    - "on human predictions with explanations and predictions of machine learning models a case study on deception detection"
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "explaining models an empirical study of how explanations impact fairness judgment"
    - "the challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence"
    - "metrics for explainable ai challenges and prospects"
    - "a survey of evaluation methods and measures for interpretable machine learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "one explanation does not fit all the promise of interactive explanations for machine learning transparency"):
  with members:
    - "explainability fact sheets a framework for systematic assessment of explainable approaches"
    - "blimey surrogate prediction explanations beyond lime"
    - "personalized explanation in machine learning a conceptualization"
    - "face feasible and actionable counterfactual explanations"
    - "natural language interaction with explainable ai models"
    - "the challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence"
    - "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences"
    - "counterfactual explanations without opening the black box automated decisions and the gdpr"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety"):
  with members:
    - "a roadmap toward the resilient internet of things for cyber physical systems"
    - "automated rationale generation a technique for explainable ai and its effects on human perceptions"
    - "model cards for model reporting"
    - "a framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning"
    - "spectrum data poisoning with adversarial deep learning"
    - "explaining explanations in ai"
    - "problem formulation and fairness"
    - "from what to how an initial review of publicly available ai ethics tools methods and research to translate principles into practices"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "explainable reinforcement learning through a causal lens"):
  with members:
    - "metrics for explainable ai challenges and prospects"
    - "contrastive explanation a structural model approach"
    - "contrastive explanations for reinforcement learning in terms of expected consequences"
    - "autonomous self explanation of behavior for interactive reinforcement learning agents"
    - "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences"
    - "starcraft ii a new challenge for reinforcement learning"
    - "counterfactuals and policy analysis in structural models"
    - "explanation trees for causal bayesian networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)