human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "unlimited budget analysis of randomised search heuristics"
  Abstract: Performance analysis of all kinds of randomised search heuristics is a rapidly growing and developing field. Run time and solution quality are two popular measures of the performance of these algorithms. The focus of this paper is on the solution quality an optimisation heuristic achieves, not on the time it takes to reach this goal, setting it far apart from runtime analysis. We contribute to its further development by introducing a novel analytical framework, called unlimited budget analysis, to derive the expected fitness value after arbitrary computational steps. It has its roots in the very recently introduced approximation error analysis and bears some similarity to fixed budget analysis. We present the framework, apply it to simple mutation-based algorithms, covering both, local and global search. We provide analytical results for a number of pseudo-Boolean functions for unlimited budget analysis and compare them to results derived within the fixed budget framework for the same algorithms and functions. There are also results of experiments to compare bounds obtained in the two different frameworks with the actual observed performance. The study show that unlimited budget analysis may lead to the same or more general estimation beyond fixed budget.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "error analysis of elitist random search heuristics"):
  with members:
    - "a theoretical framework of approximation error analysis of evolutionary algorithms"
    - "average convergence rate of evolutionary algorithms ii continuous optimization"
    - "average convergence rate of evolutionary algorithms"
    - "an analytic expression of relative approximation error for a class of evolutionary algorithms"
    - "performance analysis of evolutionary algorithms for the minimum label spanning tree problem"
    - "multiplicative drift analysis"
    - "on the approximation ability of evolutionary optimization with application to minimum set cover"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)