human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "threats on logic locking a decade later"
  Abstract: To reduce the cost of ICs and to meet the market's demand, a considerable portion of manufacturing supply chain, including silicon fabrication, packaging and testing may be pushed offshore. Utilizing a global IC manufacturing supply chain, and inclusion of non-trusted parties in the supply chain has raised concerns over security and trust related challenges including those of overproduction, counterfeiting, IP piracy, and Hardware Trojans to name a few. To reduce the risk of IC manufacturing in an untrusted and globally distributed supply chain, the researchers have proposed various locking and obfuscation mechanisms for hiding the functionality of the ICs during the manufacturing, that requires the activation of the IP after fabrication using the key value(s) that is only known to the IP/IC owner. At the same time, many such proposed obfuscation and locking mechanisms are broken with attacks that exploit the inherent vulnerabilities in such solutions. The past decade of research in this area, has resulted in many such defense and attack solutions. In this paper, we review a decade of research on hardware obfuscation from an attacker perspective, elaborate on attack and defense lessons learned, and discuss future directions that could be exploited for building stronger defenses.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "dfssd deep faults and shallow state duality a provably strong obfuscation solution for circuits with restricted access to scan chain"):
  with members:
    - "sat hard cyclic logic obfuscation for protecting the ip in the manufacturing supply chain"
    - "functional analysis attacks on logic locking"
    - "is robust design for security robust enough attack on locked circuits with restricted scan chain access"
    - "coma communication and obfuscation management architecture"
    - "benchmarking the capabilities and limitations of sat solvers in defeating obfuscation schemes"
    - "lut lock a novel lut based logic obfuscation for fpga bitstream and asic hardware protection"
    - "encrypt flip flop a novel logic encryption technique for sequential circuits"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sat hard cyclic logic obfuscation for protecting the ip in the manufacturing supply chain"):
  with members:
    - "functional analysis attacks on logic locking"
    - "coma communication and obfuscation management architecture"
    - "srclock sat resistant cyclic logic locking for protecting the hardware"
    - "benchmarking the capabilities and limitations of sat solvers in defeating obfuscation schemes"
    - "lut lock a novel lut based logic obfuscation for fpga bitstream and asic hardware protection"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "defense in depth a recipe for logic locking to prevail"):
  with members:
    - "functional analysis attacks on logic locking"
    - "taal tampering attack on any key based logic locked circuits"
    - "sail machine learning guided structural analysis attack on hardware obfuscation"
    - "logic locking for secure outsourced chip fabrication a new attack and provably secure defense mechanism"
    - "physical design obfuscation of hardware a comprehensive investigation of device and logic level techniques"
    - "threshold based obfuscated keys with quantifiable security against invasive readout"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "coma communication and obfuscation management architecture"):
  with members:
    - "functional analysis attacks on logic locking"
    - "srclock sat resistant cyclic logic locking for protecting the hardware"
    - "sail machine learning guided structural analysis attack on hardware obfuscation"
    - "benchmarking the capabilities and limitations of sat solvers in defeating obfuscation schemes"
    - "lut lock a novel lut based logic obfuscation for fpga bitstream and asic hardware protection"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)