human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "sat hard cyclic logic obfuscation for protecting the ip in the manufacturing supply chain"
  Abstract: State-of-the-art attacks against cyclic logic obfuscation use satisfiability solvers that are equipped with a set of cycle avoidance clauses. These cycle avoidance clauses are generated in a pre-processing step and define various key combinations that could open or close cycles without making the circuit oscillating or stateful. In this paper, we show that this pre-processing step has to generate cycle avoidance conditions on all cycles in a netlist, otherwise, a missing cycle could trap the solver in an infinite loop or make it exit with an incorrect key. Then, we propose several techniques by which the number of cycles is exponentially increased as a function of the number of inserted feedbacks. We further illustrate that when the number of feedbacks is increased, the pre-processing step of the attack faces an exponential increase in complexity and runtime, preventing the correct composition of cycle avoidance clauses in a reasonable time. On the other hand, if the pre-processing is not concluded, the attack formulated by the satisfiability solver will either get stuck or exit with an incorrect key. Hence, when the cyclic obfuscation under the conditions proposed in this paper is implemented, it would impose an exponentially difficult problem for the satisfiability solver based attacks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "dfssd deep faults and shallow state duality a provably strong obfuscation solution for circuits with restricted access to scan chain"):
  with members:
    - "functional analysis attacks on logic locking"
    - "is robust design for security robust enough attack on locked circuits with restricted scan chain access"
    - "coma communication and obfuscation management architecture"
    - "threats on logic locking a decade later"
    - "benchmarking the capabilities and limitations of sat solvers in defeating obfuscation schemes"
    - "lut lock a novel lut based logic obfuscation for fpga bitstream and asic hardware protection"
    - "encrypt flip flop a novel logic encryption technique for sequential circuits"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)