human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "incorporating query term independence assumption for efficient retrieval and ranking using deep neural networks"
  Abstract: Classical information retrieval (IR) methods, such as query likelihood and BM25, score documents independently w.r.t. each query term, and then accumulate the scores. Assuming query term independence allows precomputing term-document scores using these models---which can be combined with specialized data structures, such as inverted index, for efficient retrieval. Deep neural IR models, in contrast, compare the whole query to the document and are, therefore, typically employed only for late stage re-ranking. We incorporate query term independence assumption into three state-of-the-art neural IR models: BERT, Duet, and CKNRM---and evaluate their performance on a passage ranking task. Surprisingly, we observe no significant loss in result quality for Duet and CKNRM---and a small degradation in the case of BERT. However, by operating on each query term independently, these otherwise computationally intensive models become amenable to offline precomputation---dramatically reducing the cost of query evaluations employing state-of-the-art neural ranking models. This strategy makes it practical to use deep models for retrieval from large collections---and not restrict their usage to late stage re-ranking.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "interpretable time budget constrained contextualization for re ranking"):
  with members:
    - "analyzing multi head self attention specialized heads do the heavy lifting the rest can be pruned"
    - "passage re ranking with bert"
    - "a study on the interpretability of neural retrieval models using deepshap"
    - "document expansion by query prediction"
    - "an updated duet model for passage re ranking"
    - "let s measure run time extending the ir replicability infrastructure to include performance aspects"
    - "cedr contextualized embeddings for document ranking"
    - "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "overview of the trec 2019 deep learning track"):
  with members:
    - "document expansion by query prediction"
    - "critically examining the neural hype weak baselines and the additivity of effectiveness gains from neural ranking models"
    - "an updated duet model for passage re ranking"
    - "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding"
    - "neural ranking models with weak supervision"
    - "learning to match using local and distributed representations of text for web search"
    - "ms marco a human generated machine reading comprehension dataset"
    - "bag of tricks for efficient text classification"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "duet at trec 2019 deep learning track"):
  with members:
    - "overview of the trec 2019 deep learning track"
    - "passage re ranking with bert"
    - "an updated duet model for passage re ranking"
    - "cross domain regularization for neural ranking models using adversarial learning"
    - "neural ranking models with multiple document fields"
    - "benchmark for complex answer retrieval"
    - "learning to match using local and distributed representations of text for web search"
    - "a dual embedding space model for document ranking"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "report on the first hipstir workshop on the future of information retrieval"):
  with members:
    - "overview of the trec 2019 deep learning track"
    - "passage re ranking with bert"
    - "show your work improved reporting of experimental results"
    - "generating long sequences with sparse transformers"
    - "optimizing query evaluations using reinforcement learning for web search"
    - "attention is all you need"
    - "ms marco a human generated machine reading comprehension dataset"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)