human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning"
  Abstract: How does a 110-layer ResNet learn a high-complexity classifier using relatively few training examples and short training time? We present a theory towards explaining this in terms of $\textit{hierarchical learning}$. We refer hierarchical learning as the learner learns to represent a complicated target function by decomposing it into a sequence of simpler functions to reduce sample and time complexity. This paper formally analyzes how multi-layer neural networks can perform such hierarchical learning efficiently and automatically simply by applying stochastic gradient descent (SGD). On the conceptual side, we present, to the best of our knowledge, the FIRST theory result indicating how very deep neural networks can still be sample and time efficient on certain hierarchical learning tasks, when NO KNOWN non-hierarchical algorithms (such as kernel method, linear regression over feature mappings, tensor decomposition, sparse coding) are efficient. We establish a new principle called "backward feature correction", which we believe is the key to understand the hierarchical learning in multi-layer neural networks. On the technical side, we show for regression and even for binary classification, for every input dimension $d > 0$, there is a concept class consisting of degree $\omega(1)$ multi-variate polynomials so that, using $\omega(1)$-layer neural networks as learners, SGD can learn any target function from this class in $\mathsf{poly}(d)$ time using $\mathsf{poly}(d)$ samples to any $\frac{1}{\mathsf{poly}(d)}$ error, through learning to represent it as a composition of $\omega(1)$ layers of quadratic functions. In contrast, we present lower bounds stating that several non-hierarchical learners, including any kernel methods, neural tangent kernels, must suffer from $d^{\omega(1)}$ sample or time complexity to learn functions in this concept class even to any $d^{-0.01}$ error.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a deep conditioning treatment of neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "scaling limits of wide neural networks with weight sharing gaussian process behavior gradient independence and neural tangent kernel derivation"
    - "two models of double descent for weak features"
    - "size free generalization bounds for convolutional neural networks"
    - "an improved analysis of training over parameterized deep neural networks"
    - "deterministic pac bayesian generalization bounds for deep networks via generalizing noise resilience"
    - "implicit regularization in deep matrix factorization"
    - "on the learnability of deep random networks"
    - "is deeper better only when shallow is good"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "mean field analysis of two layer neural networks non asymptotic rates and generalization bounds"):
  with members:
    - "how much over parameterization is sufficient to learn deep relu networks"
    - "beyond linearization on quadratic and higher order approximation of wide neural networks"
    - "towards understanding the spectral bias of deep learning"
    - "an improved analysis of training over parameterized deep neural networks"
    - "generalization error bounds of gradient descent for learning over parameterized deep relu networks"
    - "towards moderate overparameterization global convergence guarantees for training shallow neural networks"
    - "over parameterized two level neural networks can learn near optimal feature representations"
    - "convex formulation of overparameterized deep neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "approximate is good enough probabilistic variants of dimensional and margin complexity"):
  with members:
    - "on the power and limitations of random features for understanding neural networks"
    - "neural tangent kernel convergence and generalization in neural networks"
    - "sgd learns the conjugate kernel class of the network"
    - "probabilistic rank and matrix rigidity"
    - "super linear gate and super quadratic wire lower bounds for depth two and depth three threshold circuits"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)