human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "abductive commonsense reasoning"
  Abstract: Abductive reasoning is inference to the most plausible explanation. For example, if Jenny finds her house in a mess when she returns from work, and remembers that she left a window open, she can hypothesize that a thief broke into her house and caused the mess, as the most plausible explanation. While abduction has long been considered to be at the core of how people interpret and read between the lines in natural language (Hobbs et al. (1988)), there has been relatively little NLP research in support of abductive natural language inference. We present the first study that investigates the viability of language-based abductive reasoning. We conceptualize a new task of Abductive NLI and introduce a challenge dataset, ART, that consists of over 20k commonsense narrative contexts and 200k explanations, formulated as multiple choice questions for easy automatic evaluation. We establish comprehensive baseline performance on this task based on state-of-the-art NLI and language models, which leads to 68.9% accuracy, well below human performance (91.4%). Our analysis leads to new insights into the types of reasoning that deep pre-trained language models fail to perform -- despite their strong performance on the related but fundamentally different task of entailment NLI -- pointing to interesting avenues for future research.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial nli a new benchmark for natural language understanding"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial filters of dataset biases"
    - "hellaswag can a machine really finish your sentence"
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "codah an adversarially authored question answer dataset for common sense"
    - "do neural dialog systems use the conversation history effectively an empirical study"
    - "multi task deep neural networks for natural language understanding"
    - "are we modeling the task or the annotator an investigation of annotator bias in natural language understanding datasets"
    - "no training required exploring random encoders for sentence classification"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "what does my qa model know devising controlled probes using expert knowledge"):
  with members:
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "overcoming catastrophic forgetting by neuron level plasticity control"
    - "inoculation by fine tuning a method for analyzing challenge datasets"
    - "from f to a on the n y regents science exams an overview of the aristo project"
    - "diversify your datasets analyzing generalization via controlled variance in adversarial datasets"
    - "qasc a dataset for question answering via sentence composition"
    - "wic the word in context dataset for evaluating context sensitive meaning representations"
    - "designing and interpreting probes with control tasks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "abductive reasoning as self supervision for common sense question answering"):
  with members:
    - "hellaswag can a machine really finish your sentence"
    - "drop a reading comprehension benchmark requiring discrete reasoning over paragraphs"
    - "superglue a stickier benchmark for general purpose language understanding systems"
    - "model compression via distillation and quantization"
    - "machine common sense concept paper"
    - "glue a multi task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "swag a large scale adversarial dataset for grounded commonsense inference"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "exploring ways to incorporate additional knowledge to improve natural language commonsense question answering"):
  with members:
    - "socialiqa commonsense reasoning about social interactions"
    - "careful selection of knowledge to solve open book question answering"
    - "roberta a robustly optimized bert pretraining approach"
    - "can a suit of armor conduct electricity a new dataset for open book question answering"
    - "think you have solved question answering try arc the ai2 reasoning challenge"
    - "coqa a conversational question answering challenge"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "wikihow a large scale text summarization dataset"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)