human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "efficient active learning of sparse halfspaces with arbitrary bounded noise"
  Abstract: In this work we study active learning of homogeneous $s$-sparse halfspaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$ under label noise. Even in the absence of label noise this is a challenging problem and only recently have label complexity bounds of the form $\tilde{O} \left(s \cdot \mathrm{polylog}(d, \frac{1}{\epsilon}) \right)$ been established in \citet{zhang2018efficient} for computationally efficient algorithms under the broad class of isotropic log-concave distributions. In contrast, under high levels of label noise, the label complexity bounds achieved by computationally efficient algorithms are much worse. When the label noise satisfies the {\em Massart} condition~\citep{massart2006risk}, i.e., each label is flipped with probability at most $\eta$ for a parameter $\eta \in [0,\frac 1 2)$, the work of \citet{awasthi2016learning} provides a computationally efficient active learning algorithm under isotropic log-concave distributions with label complexity $\tilde{O} \left(s^{\mathrm{poly}{(1/(1-2\eta))}} \mathrm{poly}(\log d, \frac{1}{\epsilon}) \right)$. Hence the algorithm is label-efficient only when the noise rate $\eta$ is a constant. In this work, we substantially improve on the state of the art by designing a polynomial time algorithm for active learning of $s$-sparse halfspaces under bounded noise and isotropic log-concave distributions, with a label complexity of $\tilde{O} \left(\frac{s}{(1-2\eta)^4} \mathrm{polylog} (d, \frac 1 \epsilon) \right)$. Hence, our new algorithm is label-efficient even for noise rates close to $\frac{1}{2}$. Prior to our work, such a result was not known even for the random classification noise model. Our algorithm builds upon existing margin-based algorithmic framework and at each iteration performs a sequence of online mirror descent updates on a carefully chosen loss sequence, and uses a novel gradient update rule that accounts for the bounded noise.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)