human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "restricting control flow during speculative execution with venkman"
  Abstract: Side-channel attacks such as Spectre that utilize speculative execution to steal application secrets pose a significant threat to modern computing systems. While program transformations can mitigate some Spectre attacks, more advanced attacks can divert control flow speculatively to bypass these protective instructions, rendering existing defenses useless. #R##N#In this paper, we present Venkman: a system that employs program transformation to completely thwart Spectre attacks that poison entries in the Branch Target Buffer (BTB) and the Return Stack Buffer (RSB). Venkman transforms code so that all valid targets of a control-flow transfer have an identical alignment in the virtual address space; it further transforms all branches to ensure that all entries added to the BTB and RSB are properly aligned. By transforming all code this way, Venkman ensures that, in any program wanting Spectre defenses, all control-flow transfers, including speculative ones, do not skip over protective instructions Venkman adds to the code segment to mitigate Spectre attacks. Unlike existing defenses, Venkman does not reduce sharing of the BTB and RSB and does not flush these structures, allowing safe sharing and reuse among programs while maintaining strong protection against Spectre attacks. We built a prototype of Venkman on an IBM POWER8 machine. Our evaluation on the SPEC benchmarks and selected applications shows that Venkman increases execution time to 3.47$\times$ on average and increases code size to 1.94$\times$ on average when it is used to ensure that fences are executed to mitigate Spectre attacks. Our evaluation also shows that Spectre-resistant Software Fault Isolation (SFI) built using Venkman incurs a geometric mean of 2.42$\times$ space overhead and 1.68$\times$ performance overhead.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)