human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "an exponential lower bound for the runtime of the compact genetic algorithm on jump functions"
  Abstract: In the first runtime analysis of an estimation-of-distribution algorithm (EDA) on the multimodal jump function class, Hasenohrl and Sutton (GECCO 2018) proved that the runtime of the compact genetic algorithm with suitable parameter choice on jump functions with high probability is at most polynomial (in the dimension) if the jump size is at most logarithmic (in the dimension), and is at most exponential in the jump size if the jump size is super-logarithmic. The exponential runtime guarantee was achieved with a hypothetical population size that is also exponential in the jump size. Consequently, this setting cannot lead to a better runtime.   In this work, we show that any choice of the hypothetical population size leads to a runtime that, with high probability, is at least exponential in the jump size. This result might be the first non-trivial exponential lower bound for EDAs that holds for arbitrary parameter settings.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the limitations of the univariate marginal distribution algorithm to deception and where bivariate edas might help"):
  with members:
    - "working principles of binary differential evolution"
    - "a tight runtime analysis for the cga on jump functions edas can cross fitness valleys at no extra cost"
    - "multiplicative up drift"
    - "runtime analysis of the univariate marginal distribution algorithm under low selective pressure and prior noise"
    - "significance based estimation of distribution algorithms"
    - "level based analysis of the univariate marginal distribution algorithm"
    - "level based analysis of the population based incremental learning algorithm"
    - "improved runtime bounds for the univariate marginal distribution algorithm via anti concentration"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a tight runtime analysis for the cga on jump functions edas can cross fitness valleys at no extra cost"):
  with members:
    - "probabilistic tools for the analysis of randomized optimization heuristics"
    - "fast artificial immune systems"
    - "better runtime guarantees via stochastic domination"
    - "theory of estimation of distribution algorithms"
    - "precise runtime analysis for plateaus"
    - "significance based estimation of distribution algorithms"
    - "drift analysis"
    - "fast genetic algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the runtime of the compact genetic algorithm on jump functions"):
  with members:
    - "probabilistic tools for the analysis of randomized optimization heuristics"
    - "a tight runtime analysis for the cga on jump functions edas can cross fitness valleys at no extra cost"
    - "precise runtime analysis for plateaus"
    - "the query complexity of a permutation based variant of mastermind"
    - "drift analysis"
    - "ranking based black box complexity"
    - "multiplicative drift analysis"
    - "a new method for lower bounds on the running time of evolutionary algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "precise runtime analysis for plateaus"):
  with members:
    - "theory of parameter control for discrete black box optimization provable performance gains through dynamic parameter choices"
    - "a tight runtime analysis for the cga on jump functions edas can cross fitness valleys at no extra cost"
    - "multiplicative up drift"
    - "sharp bounds on the runtime of the 1 1 ea via drift analysis and analytic combinatorial tools"
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"
    - "fast genetic algorithms"
    - "level based analysis of genetic algorithms and other search processes"
    - "unbiased black box complexities of jump functions"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)