human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "communication complexity of estimating correlations"
  Abstract: We characterize the communication complexity of the following distributed estimation problem. Alice and Bob observe infinitely many iid copies of $\rho$-correlated unit-variance (Gaussian or $\pm1$ binary) random variables, with unknown $\rho\in[-1,1]$. By interactively exchanging $k$ bits, Bob wants to produce an estimate $\hat\rho$ of $\rho$. We show that the best possible performance (optimized over interaction protocol $\Pi$ and estimator $\hat \rho$) satisfies $\inf_{\Pi \hat\rho}\sup_\rho \mathbb{E} [|\rho-\hat\rho|^2] = \tfrac{1}{k} (\frac{1}{2 \ln 2} + o(1))$. Curiously, the number of samples in our achievability scheme is exponential in $k$; by contrast, a naive scheme exchanging $k$ samples achieves the same $\Omega(1/k)$ rate but with a suboptimal prefactor. Our protocol achieving optimal performance is one-way (non-interactive). We also prove the $\Omega(1/k)$ bound even when $\rho$ is restricted to any small open sub-interval of $[-1,1]$ (i.e. a local minimax lower bound). Our proof techniques rely on symmetric strong data-processing inequalities and various tensorization techniques from information-theoretic interactive common-randomness extraction. Our results also imply an $\Omega(n)$ lower bound on the information complexity of the Gap-Hamming problem, for which we show a direct information-theoretic proof.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "accuracy memory tradeoffs and phase transitions in belief propagation"):
  with members:
    - "the circuit complexity of inference"
    - "geometric lower bounds for distributed parameter estimation under communication constraints"
    - "reducibility and computational lower bounds for problems with planted sparse structure"
    - "inference under information constraints i lower bounds from chi square contraction"
    - "extractor based time space lower bounds for learning"
    - "secret key generation with limited interaction"
    - "fast learning requires good memory a time space lower bound for parity learning"
    - "information theoretic lower bounds for distributed function computation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)