human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "why deep transformers are difficult to converge from computation order to lipschitz restricted parameter initialization"
  Abstract: The Transformer translation model employs residual connection and layer normalization to ease the optimization difficulties caused by its multi-layer encoder/decoder structure. While several previous works show that even with residual connection and layer normalization, deep Transformers still have difficulty in training, and particularly a Transformer model with more than 12 encoder/decoder layers fails to converge. In this paper, we first empirically demonstrate that a simple modification made in the official implementation which changes the computation order of residual connection and layer normalization can effectively ease the optimization of deep Transformers. In addition, we deeply compare the subtle difference in computation order, and propose a parameter initialization method which simply puts Lipschitz restriction on the initialization of Transformers but can effectively ensure their convergence. We empirically show that with proper parameter initialization, deep Transformers with the original computation order can converge, which is quite in contrast to all previous works, and obtain significant improvements with up to 24 layers. Our proposed approach additionally enables to benefit from deep decoders compared to previous works which focus on deep encoders.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "flaubert unsupervised language model pre training for french"):
  with members:
    - "arabert transformer based model for arabic language understanding"
    - "fairseq a fast extensible toolkit for sequence modeling"
    - "exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text to text transformer"
    - "reducing transformer depth on demand with structured dropout"
    - "very deep self attention networks for end to end speech recognition"
    - "unsupervised cross lingual representation learning at scale"
    - "camembert a tasty french language model"
    - "paws paraphrase adversaries from word scrambling"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)