human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on simplified np complete variants of not all equal 3 sat and 3 sat"
  Abstract: We consider simplified, monotone versions of Not-All-Equal 3-Sat and 3-Sat, variants of the famous Satisfiability Problem where each clause is made up of exactly three distinct literals. We show that Not-All-Equal 3-Sat remains NP-complete even if (1) each variable appears exactly four times, (2) there are no negations in the formula, and (3) the formula is linear, i.e., each pair of distinct clauses shares at most one variable. #R##N#Concerning 3-Sat we prove several hardness results for monotone formulas with respect to a variety of restrictions imposed on the variable appearances. Monotone 3-Sat is the restriction of 3-Sat to monotone formulas, i.e. to formulas in which each clause contains only unnegated variables or only negated variables, respectively. In particular, we show that, for any $k\geq 5$, Monotone 3-Sat is NP-complete even if each variable appears exactly $k$ times unnegated and exactly once negated. In addition, we show that Monotone 3-Sat is NP-complete even if each variable appears exactly three times unnegated and three times negated, respectively. In fact, we provide a complete analysis of Monotone 3-Sat with exactly six appearances per variable. Further, we prove that the problem remains NP-complete when restricted to instances in which each variable appears either exactly once unnegated and three times negated or the other way around. Thereby, we improve on a result by Darmann et al. [DDD18] showing NP-completeness for four appearances per variable. Our stronger result also implies that 3-Sat remains NP-complete even if each variable appears exactly three times unnegated and once negated, therewith complementing a result by Berman et al. [BKS03].

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "monotone 3 sat 2 2 is np complete"):
  with members:
    - "placing quantified variants of 3 sat and not all equal 3 sat in the polynomial hierarchy"
    - "on a variant of monotone nae 3sat and the triangle free cut problem"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "placing quantified variants of 3 sat and not all equal 3 sat in the polynomial hierarchy"):
  with members:
    - "on vertex coloring without monochromatic triangles"
    - "on the hardness of satisfiability with bounded occurrences in the polynomial time hierarchy"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)