human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "non uniform time step deep q network for carrier sense multiple access in heterogeneous wireless networks"
  Abstract: This paper investigates a new class of carrier-sense multiple access (CSMA) protocols that employ deep reinforcement learning (DRL) techniques, referred to as carrier-sense deep-reinforcement learning multiple access (CS-DLMA). The goal of CS-DLMA is to enable efficient and equitable spectrum sharing among a group of co-located heterogeneous wireless networks. Existing CSMA protocols, such as the medium access control (MAC) of WiFi, are designed for a homogeneous network in which all nodes adopt the same protocol. Such protocols suffer from severe performance degradation in a heterogeneous environment where there are nodes adopting other MAC protocols. CS-DLMA aims to circumvent this problem by making use of DRL. In particular, this paper adopts alpha-fairness as the general objective of CS-DLMA. With alpha-fairness, CS-DLMA can achieve a range of different objectives when coexisting with other MACs by changing the value of alpha. A salient feature of CS-DLMA is that it can achieve these objectives without knowing the coexisting MACs through a learning process based on DRL. The underpinning DRL technique in CS-DLMA is deep Q-network (DQN). However, the conventional DQN algorithms are not suitable for CS-DLMA due to their uniform time-step assumption. In CSMA protocols, time steps are non-uniform in that the time duration required for carrier sensing is smaller than the duration of data transmission. This paper introduces a non-uniform time-step formulation of DQN to address this issue. Our simulation results show that CS-DLMA can achieve the general alpha-fairness objective when coexisting with TDMA, ALOHA, and WiFi protocols by adjusting its own transmission strategy. Interestingly, we also find that CS-DLMA is more Pareto efficient than other CSMA protocols when coexisting with WiFi.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)