human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "pabo pseudo agent based multi objective bayesian hyperparameter optimization for efficient neural accelerator design"
  Abstract: The ever increasing computational cost of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) and the demand for energy efficient hardware for DNN acceleration has made accuracy and hardware cost co-optimization for DNNs tremendously important, especially for edge devices. Owing to the large parameter space and cost of evaluating each parameter in the search space, manually tuning of DNN hyperparameters is impractical. Automatic joint DNN and hardware hyperparameter optimization is indispensable for such problems. Bayesian optimization-based approaches have shown promising results for hyperparameter optimization of DNNs. However, most of these techniques have been developed without considering the underlying hardware, thereby leading to inefficient designs. Further, the few works that perform joint optimization are not generalizable and mainly focus on CMOS-based architectures. In this work, we present a novel pseudo agent-based multi-objective hyperparameter optimization (PABO) for maximizing the DNN performance while obtaining low hardware cost. Compared to the existing methods, our work poses a theoretically different approach for joint optimization of accuracy and hardware cost and focuses on memristive crossbar-based accelerators. PABO uses a supervisor agent to establish connections between the posterior Gaussian distribution models of network accuracy and hardware cost requirements. The agent reduces the mathematical complexity of the co-optimization problem by removing unnecessary computations and updates of acquisition functions, thereby achieving significant speed-ups for the optimization procedure. PABO outputs a Pareto frontier that underscores the trade-offs between designing high-accuracy and hardware efficiency. Our results demonstrate a superior performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods both in terms of accuracy and computational speed (~100x speed up).

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)