human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "passing tests without memorizing two models for fooling discriminators"
  Abstract: We introduce two mathematical frameworks for foolability in the context of generative distribution learning. In a nuthsell, fooling is an algorithmic task in which the input sample is drawn from some target distribution and the goal is to output a synthetic distribution that is indistinguishable from the target w.r.t to some fixed class of tests. This framework received considerable attention in the context of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), a recently proposed approach which achieves impressive empirical results. #R##N#From a theoretical viewpoint this problem seems difficult to model. This is due to the fact that in its basic form, the notion of foolability is susceptible to a type of overfitting called memorizing. This raises a challenge of devising notions and definitions that separate between fooling algorithms that generate new synthetic data vs. algorithms that merely memorize or copy the training set. #R##N#The first model we consider is called GAM--Foolability and is inspired by GANs. Here the learner has only an indirect access to the target distribution via a discriminator. The second model, called DP--Foolability, exploits the notion of differential privacy as a candidate criterion for non-memorization. #R##N#We proceed to characterize foolability within these two models and study their interrelations. We show that DP--Foolability implies GAM--Foolability and prove partial results with respect to the converse. It remains, though, an open question whether GAM--Foolability implies DP--Foolability. #R##N#We also present an application in the context of differentially private PAC learning. We show that from a statistical perspective, for any class H, learnability by a private proper learner is equivalent to the existence of a private sanitizer for H. This can be seen as an analogue of the equivalence between uniform convergence and learnability in classical PAC learning.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "an equivalence between private classification and online prediction"):
  with members:
    - "efficient noise tolerant and private learning via boosting"
    - "a necessary and sufficient stability notion for adaptive generalization"
    - "introduction to online convex optimization"
    - "privately learning thresholds closing the exponential gap"
    - "privately answering classification queries in the agnostic pac model"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "private learning implies online learning an efficient reduction"
    - "private pac learning implies finite littlestone dimension"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "online agnostic boosting via regret minimization"):
  with members:
    - "boosting for dynamical systems"
    - "introduction to online convex optimization"
    - "online control with adversarial disturbances"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "private learning implies online learning an efficient reduction"
    - "logarithmic regret for online control"
    - "the nonstochastic control problem"
    - "private pac learning implies finite littlestone dimension"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "private learning implies online learning an efficient reduction"):
  with members:
    - "efficient private algorithms for learning halfspaces"
    - "private pac learning implies finite littlestone dimension"
    - "learning in non convex games with an optimization oracle"
    - "how to use heuristics for differential privacy"
    - "calibrating noise to variance in adaptive data analysis"
    - "oracle efficient online learning and auction design"
    - "differentially private release and learning of threshold functions"
    - "statistical query algorithms for mean vector estimation and stochastic convex optimization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "graph based discriminators sample complexity and expressiveness"):
  with members:
    - "on gans and gmms"
    - "pacgan the power of two samples in generative adversarial networks"
    - "do gans actually learn the distribution an empirical study"
    - "2 notes on classes with vapnik chervonenkis dimension 1"
    - "optimal algorithms for testing closeness of discrete distributions"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)