human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "further results on structured regression for multi scale networks"
  Abstract: Gaussian Conditional Random Fields (GCRF), as a structured regression model, is designed to achieve higher regression accuracy than unstructured predictors at the expense of execution time, taking into account the objects similarities and the outputs of unstructured predictors simultaneously. As most structural models, the GCRF model does not scale well with large networks. One of the approaches consists of performing calculations on factor graphs (if it is possible) rather than on the full graph, which is more computationally efficient. The Kronecker product of the graphs appears to be a natural choice for a graph decomposition. However, this idea is not straightforwardly applicable for GCRF, since characterizing a Laplacian spectrum of the Kronecker product of graphs, which GCRF is based on, from spectra of its factor graphs has remained an open problem. In this paper we apply new estimations for the Laplacian eigenvalues and eigenvectors, and achieve high prediction accuracy of the proposed models, while the computational complexity of the models, compared to the original GCRF model, is improved from $O(n_{1}^{3}n_{2}^{3})$ to $O(n_{1}^{3} + n_{2}^{3})$. Furthermore, we study the GCRF model with a non-Kronecker graph, where the model consists of finding the nearest Kronecker product of graph for an initial graph. Although the proposed models are more complex, they achieve high prediction accuracy too, while the execution time is still much better compare to the original GCRF model. The effectiveness of the proposed models is characterized on three types of random networks where the proposed models were consistently away more accurate than the previously presented GCRF model for multiscale networks [Jesse Glass and Zoran Obradovic. Structured regression on multiscale networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 32(2):23-30, 2017.].

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)