human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "unsupervised multi document opinion summarization as copycat review generation"
  Abstract: Summarization of opinions is the process of automatically creating text summaries that reflect subjective information expressed in input documents, such as product reviews. While most previous research in opinion summarization has focused on the extractive setting, i.e. selecting fragments of the input documents to produce a summary, we let the model generate novel sentences and hence produce fluent text. Supervised abstractive summarization methods typically rely on large quantities of document-summary pairs which are expensive to acquire. In contrast, we consider the unsupervised setting, in other words, we do not use any summaries in training. We define a generative model for a multi-product review collection. Intuitively, we want to design such a model that, when generating a new review given a set of other reviews of the product, we can control the `amount of novelty' going into the new review or, equivalently, vary the degree of deviation from the input reviews. At test time, when generating summaries, we force the novelty to be minimal, and produce a text reflecting consensus opinions. We capture this intuition by defining a hierarchical variational autoencoder model. Both individual reviews and products they correspond to are associated with stochastic latent codes, and the review generator ('decoder') has direct access to the text of input reviews through the pointer-generator mechanism. In experiments on Amazon and Yelp data, we show that in this model by setting at test time the review's latent code to its mean, we produce fluent and coherent summaries.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "weakly supervised opinion summarization by leveraging external information"):
  with members:
    - "summarizing opinions aspect extraction meets sentiment prediction and they are both weakly supervised"
    - "meansum a neural model for unsupervised multi document abstractive summarization"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "neural extractive summarization with side information"
    - "ups and downs modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one class collaborative filtering"
    - "adam a method for stochastic optimization"
    - "distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)