human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "treewidth and counting projected answer sets"
  Abstract: In this paper, we introduce novel algorithms to solve projected answer set counting (#PAs). #PAs asks to count the number of answer sets with respect to a given set of projected atoms, where multiple answer sets that are identical when restricted to the projected atoms count as only one projected answer set. Our algorithms exploit small treewidth of the primal graph of the input instance by dynamic programming (DP). We establish a new algorithm for head-cycle-free (HCF) programs and lift very recent results from projected model counting to #PAs when the input is restricted to HCF programs. Further, we show how established DP algorithms for tight, normal, and disjunctive answer set programs can be extended to solve #PAs. Our algorithms run in polynomial time while requiring double exponential time in the treewidth for tight, normal, and HCF programs, and triple exponential time for disjunctive programs. Finally, we take the exponential time hypothesis (ETH) into account and establish lower bounds of bounded treewidth algorithms for #PAs. Under ETH, one cannot significantly improve our obtained worst-case runtimes.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "structural decompositions of epistemic logic programs"):
  with members:
    - "epistemic logic programs a different world view"
    - "te eth lower bounds for qbfs of bounded treewidth"
    - "splitting epistemic logic programs"
    - "answer set solving with bounded treewidth revisited"
    - "the power of non ground rules in answer set programming"
    - "combining treewidth and backdoors for csp"
    - "clique width and directed width measures for answer set programming"
    - "backdoors to tractable answer set programming"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "te eth lower bounds for qbfs of bounded treewidth"):
  with members:
    - "exploiting treewidth for projected model counting and its limits"
    - "counting complexity for reasoning in abstract argumentation"
    - "qbf as an alternative to courcelle s theorem"
    - "evaluating qbf solvers quantifier alternations matter"
    - "slightly superexponential parameterized problems"
    - "parameterized complexity results for exact bayesian network structure learning"
    - "backdoors to tractable answer set programming"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)