human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "performance of group testing algorithms with near constant tests per item"
  Abstract: We consider the nonadaptive group testing with    $N$    items, of which    $K = \Theta (N^\theta)$    are defective. We study a test design in which each item appears in nearly the same number of tests. For each item, we independently pick    $L$    tests uniformly at random with replacement and place the item in those tests. We analyze the performance of these designs with simple and practical decoding algorithms in a range of sparsity regimes and show that the performance is consistently improved in comparison with standard Bernoulli designs. We show that our new design requires roughly 23% fewer tests than a Bernoulli design when paired with the simple decoding algorithms known as combinatorial orthogonal matching pursuit and definite defectives (DD). This gives the best known nonadaptive group testing performance for    $\theta > 0.43$    and the best proven performance with a practical decoding algorithm for all    $\theta \in (0,1)$   . We also give a converse result showing that the DD algorithm is optimal with respect to our randomized design when    $\theta > 1/2$   . We complement our theoretical results with simulations that show a notable improvement over Bernoulli designs in both sparse and dense regimes.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the all or nothing behavior of bernoulli group testing"):
  with members:
    - "optimal non adaptive group testing"
    - "group testing an information theory perspective"
    - "information theoretic and algorithmic thresholds for group testing"
    - "near optimal noisy group testing via separate decoding of items"
    - "the capacity of bernoulli nonadaptive group testing"
    - "saffron a fast efficient and robust framework for group testing based on sparse graph codes"
    - "group testing algorithms bounds and simulations"
    - "the capacity of adaptive group testing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "group testing with runlength constraints for topological molecular storage"):
  with members:
    - "quantitative group testing in the sublinear regime"
    - "non adaptive quantitative group testing using irregular sparse graph codes"
    - "group testing an information theory perspective"
    - "the capacity of bernoulli nonadaptive group testing"
    - "sparse combinatorial group testing"
    - "decoding from pooled data phase transitions of message passing"
    - "nearly optimal sparse group testing"
    - "group testing algorithms bounds and simulations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "optimal multistage group testing algorithm for 3 defectives"):
  with members:
    - "a new algorithm for two stage group testing"
    - "on a hypergraph approach to multistage group testing problems"
    - "lectures on designing screening experiments"
    - "bounds on the rate of disjunctive codes"
    - "group testing with random pools optimal two stage algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "group testing an information theory perspective"):
  with members:
    - "quantitative group testing in the sublinear regime"
    - "understanding phase transitions via mutual information and mmse"
    - "learning erd h o s r enyi random graphs via edge detecting queries"
    - "information theoretic and algorithmic thresholds for group testing"
    - "novel impossibility results for group testing"
    - "noisy adaptive group testing bounds and algorithms"
    - "near optimal noisy group testing via separate decoding of items"
    - "individual testing is optimal for nonadaptive group testing in the linear regime"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sublinear time non adaptive group testing with o k log n tests via bit mixing coding"):
  with members:
    - "optimal non adaptive group testing"
    - "group testing an information theory perspective"
    - "simple codes and sparse recovery with fast decoding"
    - "information theoretic and algorithmic thresholds for group testing"
    - "cross sender bit mixing coding"
    - "on the optimality of the kautz singleton construction in probabilistic group testing"
    - "near optimal noisy group testing via separate decoding of items"
    - "individual testing is optimal for nonadaptive group testing in the linear regime"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "learning erd h o s r enyi random graphs via edge detecting queries"):
  with members:
    - "an introductory guide to fano s inequality with applications in statistical estimation"
    - "group testing an information theory perspective"
    - "information theoretic and algorithmic thresholds for group testing"
    - "on the optimality of the kautz singleton construction in probabilistic group testing"
    - "on learning graphs with edge detecting queries"
    - "noisy non adaptive group testing a near definite defectives approach"
    - "near optimal noisy group testing via separate decoding of items"
    - "individual testing is optimal for nonadaptive group testing in the linear regime"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "quantitative group testing in the sublinear regime"):
  with members:
    - "sparse graph codes for non adaptive quantitative group testing"
    - "information theoretic and algorithmic thresholds for group testing"
    - "information theoretic thresholds from the cavity method"
    - "the capacity of bernoulli nonadaptive group testing"
    - "decoding from pooled data phase transitions of message passing"
    - "on the optimality of some group testing algorithms"
    - "improved group testing rates with constant column weight designs"
    - "saffron a fast efficient and robust framework for group testing based on sparse graph codes"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "optimal non adaptive group testing"):
  with members:
    - "group testing an information theory perspective"
    - "decoding from pooled data phase transitions of message passing"
    - "threshold saturation for spatially coupled ldpc and ldgm codes on bms channels"
    - "group testing algorithms bounds and simulations"
    - "spatially coupled ensembles universally achieve capacity under belief propagation"
    - "threshold saturation via spatial coupling why convolutional ldpc ensembles perform so well over the bec"
    - "group testing with random pools optimal two stage algorithms"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)