human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "human uncertainty makes classification more robust"
  Abstract: The classification performance of deep neural networks has begun to asymptote at near-perfect levels. However, their ability to generalize outside the training set and their robustness to adversarial attacks have not. In this paper, we make progress on this problem by training with full label distributions that reflect human perceptual uncertainty. We first present a new benchmark dataset which we call CIFAR10H, containing a full distribution of human labels for each image of the CIFAR10 test set. We then show that, while contemporary classifiers fail to exhibit human-like uncertainty on their own, explicit training on our dataset closes this gap, supports improved generalization to increasingly out-of-training-distribution test datasets, and confers robustness to adversarial attacks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "understanding and enhancing mixed sample data augmentation"):
  with members:
    - "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization"
    - "data augmentation using random image cropping and patching for deep cnns"
    - "cutmix regularization strategy to train strong classifiers with localizable features"
    - "natural adversarial examples"
    - "fast autoaugment"
    - "data augmentation revisited rethinking the distribution gap between clean and augmented data"
    - "data augmentation by pairing samples for images classification"
    - "improved mixed example data augmentation"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on manifold adversarial data augmentation improves uncertainty calibration"):
  with members:
    - "towards neural networks that provably know when they don t know"
    - "large scale adversarial representation learning"
    - "benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations"
    - "measuring calibration in deep learning"
    - "disentangling adversarial robustness and generalization"
    - "why relu networks yield high confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problem"
    - "on calibration of modern neural networks"
    - "selective classification for deep neural networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)