human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "human and automatic detection of generated text"
  Abstract: With the advent of generative models with a billion parameters or more, it is now possible to automatically generate vast amounts of human-sounding text. This raises questions into just how human-like is the machine-generated text, and how long does a text excerpt need to be for both humans and automatic discriminators to be able reliably detect that it was machine-generated. In this paper, we conduct a thorough investigation of how choices such as sampling strategy and text excerpt length can impact the performance of automatic detection methods as well as human raters. We find that the sampling strategies which result in more human-like text according to human raters create distributional differences from human-written text that make detection easy for automatic discriminators.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards a human like open domain chatbot"):
  with members:
    - "transfertransfo a transfer learning approach for neural network based conversational agents"
    - "better automatic evaluation of open domain dialogue systems with contextualized embeddings"
    - "the curious case of neural text degeneration"
    - "unifying human and statistical evaluation for natural language generation"
    - "ctrl a conditional transformer language model for controllable generation"
    - "jointly optimizing diversity and relevance in neural response generation"
    - "the evolved transformer"
    - "what makes a good conversation how controllable attributes affect human judgments"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "limits of detecting text generated by large scale language models"):
  with members:
    - "the curious case of neural text degeneration"
    - "unifying human and statistical evaluation for natural language generation"
    - "real or fake learning to discriminate machine from human generated text"
    - "ctrl a conditional transformer language model for controllable generation"
    - "release strategies and the social impacts of language models"
    - "gltr statistical detection and visualization of generated text"
    - "defending against neural fake news"
    - "automated speech generation from un general assembly statements mapping risks in ai generated texts"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)