human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "fair is better than sensational man is to doctor as woman is to doctor"
  Abstract: Analogies such as "man is to king as woman is to X" are often used to illustrate the amazing power of word embeddings. Concurrently, they have also been used to expose how strongly human biases are encoded in vector spaces built on natural language, like "man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker". Recent work has shown that analogies are in fact not such a diagnostic for bias, and other methods have been proven to be more apt to the task. However, beside the intrinsic problems with the analogy task as a bias detection tool, in this paper we show that a series of issues related to how analogies have been implemented and used might have yielded a distorted picture of bias in word embeddings. Human biases are present in word embeddings and need to be addressed. Analogies, though, are probably not the right tool to do so. Also, the way they have been most often used has exacerbated some possibly non-existing biases and perhaps hid others. Because they are still widely popular, and some of them have become classics within and outside the NLP community, we deem it important to provide a series of clarifications that should put well-known, and potentially new cases into the right perspective.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sentence analogies exploring linguistic relationships and regularities in sentence embeddings"):
  with members:
    - "a primer in bertology what we know about how bert works"
    - "efficient sentence embedding using discrete cosine transform"
    - "sentence bert sentence embeddings using siamese bert networks"
    - "transformer xl attentive language models beyond a fixed length context"
    - "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding"
    - "roberta a robustly optimized bert pretraining approach"
    - "bart denoising sequence to sequence pre training for natural language generation translation and comprehension"
    - "assessing composition in sentence vector representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "inducing relational knowledge from bert"):
  with members:
    - "analogies explained towards understanding word embeddings"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "relational word embeddings"
    - "barack s wife hillary using knowledge graphs for fact aware language modeling"
    - "comet commonsense transformers for automatic knowledge graph construction"
    - "do neural language representations learn physical commonsense"
    - "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "measuring social bias in knowledge graph embeddings"):
  with members:
    - "on measuring social biases in sentence encoders"
    - "rotate knowledge graph embedding by relational rotation in complex space"
    - "barack s wife hillary using knowledge graphs for fact aware language modeling"
    - "evaluating gender bias in machine translation"
    - "black is to criminal as caucasian is to police detecting and removing multiclass bias in word embeddings"
    - "ernie enhanced language representation with informative entities"
    - "evaluating the underlying gender bias in contextualized word embeddings"
    - "compositional fairness constraints for graph embeddings"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "cognival a framework for cognitive word embedding evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "robust evaluation of language brain encoding experiments"
    - "entity recognition at first sight improving ner with eye movement information"
    - "can eye movement data be used as ground truth for word embeddings evaluation"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"
    - "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding"
    - "a survey of word embeddings evaluation methods"
    - "replicability analysis for natural language processing testing significance with multiple datasets"
    - "experiential distributional and dependency based word embeddings have complementary roles in decoding brain activity"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)