human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "telehammer cross privilege boundary rowhammer through implicit accesses"
  Abstract: The rowhammer bug allows an attacker to gain privilege escalation or steal private data. A key requirement of all existing rowhammer attacks is that an attacker must have access to at least part of an exploitable hammer row. We refer to such rowhammer attacks as PeriHammer. The state-of-the-art software-only defenses against PeriHammer attacks is to make the exploitable hammer rows beyond the attacker's access permission. In this paper, we question the necessity of the above requirement and propose a new class of rowhammer attacks, termed as TeleHammer. It is a paradigm shift in rowhammer attacks since it crosses privilege boundary to stealthily rowhammer an inaccessible row by implicit DRAM accesses. Such accesses are achieved by abusing inherent features of modern hardware and or software. We propose a generic model to rigorously formalize the necessary conditions to initiate TeleHammer and PeriHammer, respectively. Compared to PeriHammer, TeleHammer can defeat the advanced software-only defenses, stealthy in hiding itself and hard to be mitigated. To demonstrate the practicality of TeleHammer and its advantages, we have created a TeleHammer's instance, called PThammer, which leverages the address-translation feature of modern processors. We observe that a memory access from user space can induce a load of a Level-1 page-table entry (L1PTE) from memory and thus hammer the L1PTE once, although L1PTE is not accessible to us. To achieve a high enough hammering frequency, we flush relevant TLB and cache effectively and efficiently. To this end, we demonstrate PThammer on three different test machines and show that it can cross user-kernel boundary and induce the first bit flips in L1PTEs within 15 minutes of double-sided PThammering. We have exploited PThammer to defeat advanced software-only rowhammer defenses in default system setting.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)