human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "mathematical notions vs human perception of fairness a descriptive approach to fairness for machine learning"
  Abstract: Fairness for Machine Learning has received considerable attention, recently. Various mathematical formulations of fairness have been proposed, and it has been shown that it is impossible to satisfy all of them simultaneously. The literature so far has dealt with these impossibility results by quantifying the tradeoffs between different formulations of fairness. Our work takes a different perspective on this issue. Rather than requiring all notions of fairness to (partially) hold at the same time, we ask which one of them is the most appropriate given the societal domain in which the decision-making model is to be deployed. We take a descriptive approach and set out to identify the notion of fairness that best captures \emph{lay people's perception of fairness}. We run adaptive experiments designed to pinpoint the most compatible notion of fairness with each participant's choices through a small number of tests. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that the most simplistic mathematical definition of fairness---namely, demographic parity---most closely matches people's idea of fairness in two distinct application scenarios. This conclusion remains intact even when we explicitly tell the participants about the alternative, more complicated definitions of fairness, and we reduce the cognitive burden of evaluating those notions for them. Our findings have important implications for the Fair ML literature and the discourse on formalizing algorithmic fairness.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness"):
  with members:
    - "on measuring social biases in sentence encoders"
    - "fairface face attribute dataset for balanced race gender and age"
    - "fair regression quantitative definitions and reduction based algorithms"
    - "putting fairness principles into practice challenges metrics and improvements"
    - "generative adversarial networks for mitigating biases in machine learning systems"
    - "improved adversarial learning for fair classification"
    - "compositional fairness constraints for graph embeddings"
    - "scalable fair clustering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "factors influencing perceived fairness in algorithmic decision making algorithm outcomes development procedures and individual differences"):
  with members:
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "society in the loop programming the algorithmic social contract"
    - "the frontiers of fairness in machine learning"
    - "manipulating and measuring model interpretability"
    - "fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high stakes public sector decision making"
    - "a reductions approach to fair classification"
    - "demographics and discussion influence views on algorithmic fairness"
    - "network dissection quantifying interpretability of deep visual representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "chexclusion fairness gaps in deep chest x ray classifiers"):
  with members:
    - "bias in bios a case study of semantic representation bias in a high stakes setting"
    - "a simulation based dynamic evaluation framework for system wide algorithmic fairness"
    - "on the fairness of disentangled representations"
    - "mimic cxr jpg a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographs"
    - "learning to diagnose from scratch by exploiting dependencies among labels"
    - "variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs a cross sectional study"
    - "chexnet radiologist level pneumonia detection on chest x rays with deep learning"
    - "chestx ray8 hospital scale chest x ray database and benchmarks on weakly supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "privacy preserving crowd guided ai decision making in ethical dilemmas"):
  with members:
    - "collecting and analyzing multidimensional data with local differential privacy"
    - "deep tractable probabilistic models for moral responsibility"
    - "building ethics into artificial intelligence"
    - "privacy loss in apple s implementation of differential privacy on macos 10 12"
    - "a voting based system for ethical decision making"
    - "the social dilemma of autonomous vehicles"
    - "rappor randomized aggregatable privacy preserving ordinal response"
    - "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a human in the loop framework to construct context dependent mathematical formulations of fairness"):
  with members:
    - "improving fairness in machine learning systems what do industry practitioners need"
    - "it s reducing a human being to a percentage perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions"
    - "a moral framework for understanding of fair ml through economic models of equality of opportunity"
    - "how do fairness definitions fare examining public attitudes towards algorithmic definitions of fairness"
    - "fairness and accountability design needs for algorithmic support in high stakes public sector decision making"
    - "a voting based system for ethical decision making"
    - "equality of opportunity in supervised learning"
    - "inherent trade offs in the fair determination of risk scores"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the challenge of imputation in explainable artificial intelligence models"):
  with members:
    - "fairness and missing values"
    - "challenges for transparency"
    - "xgboost a scalable tree boosting system"
    - "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CY(Computers and Society)