human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "parameterized inapproximability for steiner orientation by gap amplification"
  Abstract: In the $k$-Steiner Orientation problem, we are given a mixed graph, that is, with both directed and undirected edges, and a set of $k$ terminal pairs. The goal is to find an orientation of the undirected edges that maximizes the number of terminal pairs for which there is a path from the source to the sink. The problem is known to be W[1]-hard when parameterized by k and hard to approximate up to some constant for FPT algorithms assuming Gap-ETH. On the other hand, no approximation factor better than $O(k)$ is known.  We show that $k$-Steiner Orientation is unlikely to admit an approximation algorithm with any constant factor, even within FPT running time. To obtain this result, we construct a self-reduction via a hashing-based gap amplification technique, which turns out useful even outside of the FPT paradigm. Precisely, we rule out any approximation factor of the form $(\log k)^{o(1)}$ for FPT algorithms (assuming FPT $\ne$ W[1]) and $(\log n)^{o(1)}$ for~purely polynomial-time algorithms (assuming that the class W[1] does not admit randomized FPT algorithms). Moreover, we prove $k$-Steiner Orientation to belong to W[1], which entails W[1]-completeness of $(\log k)^{o(1)}$-approximation for $k$-Steiner Orientation This provides an example of a natural approximation task that is complete in a parameterized complexity class.  Finally, we apply our technique to the maximization version of directed multicut - Max $(k,p)$-Directed Multicut - where we are given a directed graph, $k$ terminals pairs, and a budget $p$. The goal is to maximize the number of separated terminal pairs by removing $p$ edges. We present a simple proof that the problem admits no FPT approximation with factor $O(k^{\frac 1 2 - \epsilon})$ (assuming FPT $\ne$ W[1]) and no polynomial-time approximation with ratio $O(|E(G)|^{\frac 1 2 - \epsilon})$ (assuming NP $\not\subseteq$ co-RP).

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)