human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "decentralized pliable index coding"
  Abstract: This paper introduces the ${\it decentralized}$ Pliable Index CODing (PICOD) problem: a variant of the Index Coding (IC) problem, where a central transmitter serves ${\it pliable}$ users with message side information; here, pliable refers to the fact that a user is satisfied by decoding ${\it any}$ $t$ messages that are not in its side information set. In the decentralized PICOD, a central transmitter with knowledge of all messages is not present, and instead users share among themselves massages that can only depend on their local side information set. This paper characterizes the capacity of two classes of decentralized complete--$S$ PICOD$(t)$ problems with $m$ messages (where the set $S\subset[m]$ contains the sizes of the side information sets, and the number of users is $n=\sum_{s\in S}\binom{m}{s}$, with no two users having the same side information set): (i) the consecutive case: $S=[s_\min:s_\max]$ for some $0 \leq s_\min\leq s_\max \leq m-t$, and (ii) the complement-consecutive case: $S=[0:m-t]\backslash[s_\min:s_\max]$, for some $0 < s_\min\leq s_\max < m-t$. Interestingly, the optimal code-length for the decentralized PICOD in those cases is the same as for the classical (centralized) PICOD counterpart, except when the problem is no longer pliable, that is, it reduces to an IC problem where every user needs to decode all messages not in its side information set. Although the optimal code-length may be the same in both centralized and decentralized settings, the actual optimal codes are not. For the decentralized PICOD, sparse Maximum Distance Separable (MDS) codes and vector linear index codes are used (as opposed to scalar linear codes).

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "secure decentralized pliable index coding"):
  with members:
    - "task based solutions to embedded index coding"
    - "embedded index coding"
    - "private pliable index coding"
    - "on pliable index coding"
    - "improved lower bounds for pliable index coding using absent receivers"
    - "optimal rate characterisation for pliable index coding using absent receivers"
    - "tight information theoretic converse results for some pliable index coding problems"
    - "capacity theorems for distributed index coding"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)