human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "trade offs in static and dynamic evaluation of hierarchical queries"
  Abstract: We investigate trade-offs in static and dynamic evaluation of hierarchical queries with arbitrary free variables. In the static setting, the trade-off is between the time to partially compute the query result and the delay needed to enumerate its tuples. In the dynamic setting, we additionally consider the time needed to update the query result in the presence of single-tuple inserts and deletes to the input database. #R##N#Our approach observes the degree of values in the database and uses different computation and maintenance strategies for high-degree and low-degree values. For the latter it partially computes the result, while for the former it computes enough information to allow for on-the-fly enumeration. #R##N#The main result of this work defines the preprocessing time, the update time, and the enumeration delay as functions of the light/heavy threshold and of the factorization width of the hierarchical query. By conveniently choosing this threshold, our approach can recover a number of prior results when restricted to hierarchical queries.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fast join project query evaluation using matrix multiplication"):
  with members:
    - "memory efficient group by aggregates over multi way joins"
    - "size bounds and query plans for relational joins"
    - "extracting and analyzing hidden graphs from relational databases"
    - "compressed representations of conjunctive query results"
    - "improved rectangular matrix multiplication using powers of the coppersmith winograd tensor"
    - "set containment join revisited"
    - "data structure lower bounds for document indexing problems"
    - "skew strikes back new developments in the theory of join algorithms"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)