human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the order of things position aware network friendly recommendations in long viewing sessions"
  Abstract: Caching has recently attracted a lot of attention in the wireless communications community, as a means to cope with the increasing number of users consuming web content from mobile devices. Caching offers an opportunity for a win-win scenario: nearby content can improve the video streaming experience for the user, and free up valuable network resources for the operator. At the same time, recent works have shown that recommendations of popular content apps are responsible for a significant percentage of users requests. As a result, some very recent works have considered how to nudge recommendations to facilitate the network (e.g., increase cache hit rates). In this paper, we follow up on this line of work, and consider the problem of designing cache friendly recommendations for long viewing sessions; specifically, we attempt to answer two open questions in this context: (i) given that recommendation position affects user click rates, what is the impact on the performance of such network-friendly recommender solutions? (ii) can the resulting optimization problems be solved efficiently, when considering both sequences of dependent accesses (e.g., YouTube) and position preference? To this end, we propose a stochastic model that incorporates position-aware recommendations into a Markovian traversal model of the content catalog, and derive the average cost of a user session using absorbing Markov chain theory. We then formulate the optimization problem, and after a careful sequence of equivalent transformations show that it has a linear program equivalent and thus can be solved efficiently. Finally, we use a range of real datasets we collected to investigate the impact of position preference in recommendations on the proposed optimal algorithm. Our results suggest more than 30\% improvement with respect to state-of-the-art methods.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)