human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "is a good representation sufficient for sample efficient reinforcement learning"
  Abstract: Modern deep learning methods provide an effective means to learn good representations. However, is a good representation itself sufficient for efficient reinforcement learning? This question is largely unexplored, and the extant body of literature mainly focuses on conditions which permit efficient reinforcement learning with little understanding of what are necessary conditions for efficient reinforcement learning. This work provides strong negative results for reinforcement learning methods with function approximation for which a good representation (feature extractor) is known to the agent, focusing on natural representational conditions relevant to value-based learning and policy-based learning. For value-based learning, we show that even if the agent has a highly accurate linear representation, the agent still needs to sample exponentially many trajectories in order to find a near-optimal policy. For policy-based learning, we show even if the agent's linear representation is capable of perfectly representing the optimal policy, the agent still needs to sample exponentially many trajectories in order to find a near-optimal policy. #R##N#These lower bounds highlight the fact that having a good (value-based or policy-based) representation in and of itself is insufficient for efficient reinforcement learning. In particular, these results provide new insights into why the existing provably efficient reinforcement learning methods rely on further assumptions, which are often model-based in nature. Additionally, our lower bounds imply exponential separations in the sample complexity between 1) value-based learning with perfect representation and value-based learning with a good-but-not-perfect representation, 2) value-based learning and policy-based learning, 3) policy-based learning and supervised learning and 4) reinforcement learning and imitation learning.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "beyond ucb optimal and efficient contextual bandits with regression oracles"):
  with members:
    - "efficient and robust algorithms for adversarial linear contextual bandits"
    - "introduction to online convex optimization"
    - "comments on the du kakade wang yang lower bounds"
    - "model selection for contextual bandits"
    - "contextual bandits with surrogate losses margin bounds and efficient algorithms"
    - "new insights into bootstrapping for bandits"
    - "practical contextual bandits with regression oracles"
    - "make the minority great again first order regret bound for contextual bandits"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "discor corrective feedback in reinforcement learning via distribution correction"):
  with members:
    - "gradient surgery for multi task learning"
    - "diagnosing bottlenecks in deep q learning algorithms"
    - "towards characterizing divergence in deep q learning"
    - "behavior regularized offline reinforcement learning"
    - "meta world a benchmark and evaluation for multi task and meta reinforcement learning"
    - "stabilizing off policy q learning via bootstrapping error reduction"
    - "provably efficient q learning with function approximation via distribution shift error checking oracle"
    - "ray interference a source of plateaus in deep reinforcement learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning near optimal policies with low inherent bellman error"):
  with members:
    - "provably efficient reinforcement learning with linear function approximation"
    - "on the optimality of sparse model based planning for markov decision processes"
    - "tighter problem dependent regret bounds in reinforcement learning without domain knowledge using value function bounds"
    - "frequentist regret bounds for randomized least squares value iteration"
    - "non asymptotic gap dependent regret bounds for tabular mdps"
    - "worst case regret bounds for exploration via randomized value functions"
    - "comments on the du kakade wang yang lower bounds"
    - "tight regret bounds for model based reinforcement learning with greedy policies"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "efficient and robust algorithms for adversarial linear contextual bandits"):
  with members:
    - "weighted linear bandits for non stationary environments"
    - "comments on the du kakade wang yang lower bounds"
    - "model selection for contextual bandits"
    - "learning to optimize under non stationarity"
    - "iterate averaging as regularization for stochastic gradient descent"
    - "contextual bandits with surrogate losses margin bounds and efficient algorithms"
    - "make the minority great again first order regret bound for contextual bandits"
    - "kernel based methods for bandit convex optimization"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "agnostic q learning with function approximation in deterministic systems tight bounds on approximation error and sample complexity"):
  with members:
    - "efficient and robust algorithms for adversarial linear contextual bandits"
    - "provably efficient reinforcement learning with linear function approximation"
    - "on the optimality of sparse model based planning for markov decision processes"
    - "sample optimal parametric q learning using linearly additive features"
    - "non asymptotic gap dependent regret bounds for tabular mdps"
    - "finite sample analysis for sarsa with linear function approximation"
    - "provably efficient q learning with function approximation via distribution shift error checking oracle"
    - "comments on the du kakade wang yang lower bounds"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "provably efficient exploration in policy optimization"):
  with members:
    - "provably efficient reinforcement learning with linear function approximation"
    - "exploration enhanced politex"
    - "neural proximal trust region policy optimization attains globally optimal policy"
    - "sample optimal parametric q learning using linearly additive features"
    - "a theoretical analysis of deep q learning"
    - "online convex optimization in adversarial markov decision processes"
    - "optimality and approximation with policy gradient methods in markov decision processes"
    - "sqrt n regret for learning in markov decision processes with function approximation and low bellman rank"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "frequentist regret bounds for randomized least squares value iteration"):
  with members:
    - "learning near optimal policies with low inherent bellman error"
    - "provably efficient reinforcement learning with linear function approximation"
    - "tighter problem dependent regret bounds in reinforcement learning without domain knowledge using value function bounds"
    - "sample optimal parametric q learning using linearly additive features"
    - "worst case regret bounds for exploration via randomized value functions"
    - "comments on the du kakade wang yang lower bounds"
    - "reinforcement leaning in feature space matrix bandit kernels and regret bound"
    - "sample optimal parametric q learning with linear transition models"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "comments on the du kakade wang yang lower bounds"):
  with members:
    - "learning to optimize via posterior sampling"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)