human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "non adaptive quantitative group testing using irregular sparse graph codes"
  Abstract: This paper considers the problem of Quantitative Group Testing (QGT) where there are some defective items among a large population of $N$ items. We consider the scenario in which each item is defective with probability $K/N$, independently from the other items. In the QGT problem, the goal is to identify all or a sufficiently large fraction of the defective items by testing groups of items, with the minimum possible number of tests. In particular, the outcome of each test is a non-negative integer which indicates the number of defective items in the tested group. In this work, we propose a non-adaptive QGT scheme for the underlying randomized model for defective items, which utilizes sparse graph codes over irregular bipartite graphs with optimized degree profiles on the left nodes of the graph as well as binary $t$-error-correcting BCH codes. We show that in the sub-linear regime, i.e., when the ratio $K/N$ vanishes as $N$ grows unbounded, the proposed scheme with ${m=c(t,d)K(t\log (\frac{\ell N}{c(t,d)K}+1)+1)}$ tests can identify all the defective items with probability approaching $1$, where $d$ and $\ell$ are the maximum and average left degree, respectively, and $c(t,d)$ depends only on $t$ and $d$ (and does not depend on $K$ and $N$). For any $t\leq 4$, the testing and recovery algorithms of the proposed scheme have the computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}(N\log \frac{N}{K})$ and $\mathcal{O}(K\log \frac{N}{K})$, respectively. The proposed scheme outperforms two recently proposed non-adaptive QGT schemes for the sub-linear regime, including our scheme based on regular bipartite graphs and the scheme of Gebhard et al., in terms of the number of tests required to identify all defective items with high probability.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "group testing with runlength constraints for topological molecular storage"):
  with members:
    - "quantitative group testing in the sublinear regime"
    - "group testing an information theory perspective"
    - "performance of group testing algorithms with near constant tests per item"
    - "the capacity of bernoulli nonadaptive group testing"
    - "sparse combinatorial group testing"
    - "decoding from pooled data phase transitions of message passing"
    - "nearly optimal sparse group testing"
    - "group testing algorithms bounds and simulations"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)