human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "complexity and efficient algorithms for data inconsistency evaluating and repairing"
  Abstract: Data inconsistency evaluating and repairing are major concerns in data quality management. As the basic computing task, optimal subset repair is not only applied for cost estimation during the progress of database repairing, but also directly used to derive the evaluation of database inconsistency. Computing an optimal subset repair is to find a minimum tuple set from an inconsistent database whose remove results in a consistent subset left. Tight bound on the complexity and efficient algorithms are still unknown. In this paper, we improve the existing complexity and algorithmic results, together with a fast estimation on the size of optimal subset repair. We first strengthen the dichotomy for optimal subset repair computation problem, we show that it is not only APXcomplete, but also NPhard to approximate an optimal subset repair with a factor better than $17/16$ for most cases. We second show a $(2-0.5^{\tiny\sigma-1})$-approximation whenever given $\sigma$ functional dependencies, and a $(2-\eta_k+\frac{\eta_k}{k})$-approximation when an $\eta_k$-portion of tuples have the $k$-quasi-Tur$\acute{\text{a}}$n property for some $k>1$. We finally show a sublinear estimator on the size of optimal \textit{S}-repair for subset queries, it outputs an estimation of a ratio $2n+\epsilon n$ with a high probability, thus deriving an estimation of FD-inconsistency degree of a ratio $2+\epsilon$. To support a variety of subset queries for FD-inconsistency evaluation, we unify them as the $\subseteq$-oracle which can answer membership-query, and return $p$ tuples uniformly sampled whenever given a number $p$. Experiments are conducted on range queries as an implementation of $\subseteq$-oracle, and results show the efficiency of our FD-inconsistency degree estimator.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)