human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a capsule network for recommendation and explaining what you like and dislike"
  Abstract: User reviews contain rich semantics towards the preference of users to features of items. Recently, many deep learning based solutions have been proposed by exploiting reviews for recommendation. The attention mechanism is mainly adopted in these works to identify words or aspects that are important for rating prediction. However, it is still hard to understand whether a user likes or dislikes an aspect of an item according to what viewpoint the user holds and to what extent, without examining the review details. Here, we consider a pair of a viewpoint held by a user and an aspect of an item as a logic unit. Reasoning a rating behavior by discovering the informative logic units from the reviews and resolving their corresponding sentiments could enable a better rating prediction with explanation. To this end, in this paper, we propose a capsule network based model for rating prediction with user reviews, named CARP. For each user-item pair, CARP is devised to extract the informative logic units from the reviews and infer their corresponding sentiments. The model firstly extracts the viewpoints and aspects from the user and item review documents respectively. Then we derive the representation of each logic unit based on its constituent viewpoint and aspect. A sentiment capsule architecture with a novel Routing by Bi-Agreement mechanism is proposed to identify the informative logic unit and the sentiment based representations in user-item level for rating prediction. Extensive experiments are conducted over seven real-world datasets with diverse characteristics. Our results demonstrate that the proposed CARP obtains substantial performance gain over recently proposed state-of-the-art models in terms of prediction accuracy. Further analysis shows that our model can successfully discover the interpretable reasons at a finer level of granularity.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "discovering protagonist of sentiment with aspect reconstructed capsule network"):
  with members:
    - "multi labeled relation extraction with attentive capsule network"
    - "transformation networks for target oriented sentiment classification"
    - "aspect level sentiment classification with attention over attention neural networks"
    - "aspect based sentiment analysis with gated convolutional networks"
    - "dynamic routing between capsules"
    - "interactive attention networks for aspect level sentiment classification"
    - "aspect level sentiment classification with deep memory network"
    - "character level convolutional networks for text classification"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "hunt protagonist of sentiment sentiment analysis via capsule network with sentiment aspect reconstruction"):
  with members:
    - "multi labeled relation extraction with attentive capsule network"
    - "aspect based sentiment analysis with gated convolutional networks"
    - "dynamic routing between capsules"
    - "adam a method for stochastic optimization"
    - "neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "explainable recommendation a survey and new perspectives"):
  with members:
    - "attention is not not explanation"
    - "the fact taming latent factor models for explainability with factorization trees"
    - "learning disentangled representations for recommendation"
    - "attention is not explanation"
    - "incorporating interpretability into latent factor models via fast influence analysis"
    - "are we really making much progress a worrying analysis of recent neural recommendation approaches"
    - "mmalfm explainable recommendation by leveraging reviews and images"
    - "deep learning based recommender system a survey and new perspectives"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)