human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "human vs muppet a conservative estimate of human performance on the glue benchmark"
  Abstract: The GLUE benchmark (Wang et al., 2019b) is a suite of language understanding tasks which has seen dramatic progress in the past year, with average performance moving from 70.0 at launch to 83.9, state of the art at the time of writing (May 24, 2019). Here, we measure human performance on the benchmark, in order to learn whether significant headroom remains for further progress. We provide a conservative estimate of human performance on the benchmark through crowdsourcing: Our annotators are non-experts who must learn each task from a brief set of instructions and 20 examples. In spite of limited training, these annotators robustly outperform the state of the art on six of the nine GLUE tasks and achieve an average score of 87.1. Given the fast pace of progress however, the headroom we observe is quite limited. To reproduce the data-poor setting that our annotators must learn in, we also train the BERT model (Devlin et al., 2019) in limited-data regimes, and conclude that low-resource sentence classification remains a challenge for modern neural network approaches to text understanding.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "superglue a stickier benchmark for general purpose language understanding systems"):
  with members:
    - "boolq exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes no questions"
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "paws paraphrase adversaries from word scrambling"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "a surprisingly robust trick for the winograd schema challenge"
    - "multi task deep neural networks for natural language understanding"
    - "improving multi task deep neural networks via knowledge distillation for natural language understanding"
    - "lipstick on a pig debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"):
  with members:
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "non entailed subsequences as a challenge for natural language inference"
    - "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data"
    - "assessing composition in sentence vector representations"
    - "breaking nli systems with sentences that require simple lexical inferences"
    - "collecting diverse natural language inference problems for sentence representation evaluation"
    - "teaching syntax by adversarial distraction"
    - "hypothesis only baselines in natural language inference"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning to learn words from narrated video"):
  with members:
    - "compositional generalization in image captioning"
    - "few shot representation learning for out of vocabulary words"
    - "lxmert learning cross modality encoder representations from transformers"
    - "unicoder vl a universal encoder for vision and language by cross modal pre training"
    - "vilbert pretraining task agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision and language tasks"
    - "videobert a joint model for video and language representation learning"
    - "compositional generalization through meta sequence to sequence learning"
    - "unified vision language pre training for image captioning and vqa"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "berts of a feather do not generalize together large variability in generalization across models with similar test set performance"):
  with members:
    - "what bert is not lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language models"
    - "visualizing and measuring the geometry of bert"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "correlating neural and symbolic representations of language"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "multi task deep neural networks for natural language understanding"
    - "open sesame getting inside bert s linguistic knowledge"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)