human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "weighted voting on the blockchain improving consensus in proof of stake protocols"
  Abstract: Proof of Stake (PoS) protocols rely on voting mechanisms to reach consensus on the current state. If an enhanced majority of staking nodes, also called validators, agree on a proposed block, then this block is appended to the blockchain. Yet, these protocols remain vulnerable to faults caused by validators who abstain either accidentally or maliciously. To protect against such faults while retaining the PoS selection and reward allocation schemes, we study weighted voting in validator committees. We formalize the block creation process and introduce validators' voting profiles which we update by a multiplicative weights algorithm relative to validators' voting behavior and aggregate blockchain rewards. Using this framework, we leverage weighted majority voting rules that optimize collective decision making to show, both numerically and analytically, that the consensus mechanism is more robust if validators' votes are appropriately scaled. We raise potential issues and limitations of weighted voting in trustless, decentralized networks and relate our results to the design of current PoS protocols.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "presto a systematic framework for blockchain consensus protocols"):
  with members:
    - "oceanic games centralization risks and incentives in blockchain mining"
    - "blockchain trilemma solver algorand has dilemma over undecidable messages"
    - "blockchain technologies for the internet of things research issues and challenges"
    - "strongchain transparent and collaborative proof of work consensus"
    - "a survey on consensus mechanisms and mining strategy management in blockchain networks"
    - "sok tools for game theoretic models of security for cryptocurrencies"
    - "incentives in ethereum s hybrid casper protocol"
    - "scilla a smart contract intermediate level language"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "oceanic games centralization risks and incentives in blockchain mining"):
  with members:
    - "incentives in ethereum s hybrid casper protocol"
    - "reward sharing schemes for stake pools"
    - "compounding of wealth in proof of stake cryptocurrencies"
    - "bitcoin a natural oligopoly"
    - "socially optimal mining pools"
    - "blockchain mining games"
    - "cryptocurrencies without proof of work"
    - "the miner s dilemma"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)