human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "improving network intrusion detection classiﬁers by non payload based exploit independent obfuscations an adversarial approach"
  Abstract: Machine-learning based intrusion detection classifiers are able to detect unknown attacks, but at the same time, they may be susceptible to evasion by obfuscation techniques. An adversary intruder which possesses a crucial knowledge about a protection system can easily bypass the detection module. The main objective of our work is to improve the performance capabilities of intrusion detection classifiers against such adversaries. To this end, we firstly propose several obfuscation techniques of remote attacks that are based on the modification of various properties of network connections; then we conduct a set of comprehensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of intrusion detection classifiers against obfuscated attacks. We instantiate our approach by means of a tool, based on NetEm and Metasploit, which implements our obfuscation operators on any TCP communication. This allows us to generate modified network traffic for machine learning experiments employing features for assessing network statistics and behavior of TCP connections. We perform the evaluation of five classifiers: Gaussian Naive Bayes, Gaussian Naive Bayes with kernel density estimation, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machines. Our experiments confirm the assumption that it is possible to evade the intrusion detection capability of all classifiers trained without prior knowledge about obfuscated attacks, causing an exacerbation of the TPR ranging from 7.8% to 66.8%. Further, when widening the training knowledge of the classifiers by a subset of obfuscated attacks, we achieve a significant improvement of the TPR by 4.21% - 73.3%, while the FPR is deteriorated only slightly (0.1% - 1.48%). Finally, we test the capability of an obfuscations-aware classifier to detect unknown obfuscated attacks, where we achieve over 90% detection rate on average for most of the obfuscations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "survey of network intrusion detection methods from the perspective of the knowledge discovery in databases process"):
  with members:
    - "asnm datasets a collection of network traffic features for testing of adversarial classifiers and network intrusion detectors"
    - "practical black box attacks against machine learning"
    - "a new approach to dimensionality reduction for anomaly detection in data traffic"
    - "evasion attacks against machine learning at test time"
    - "an implementation of intrusion detection system using genetic algorithm"
    - "improved use of continuous attributes in c4 5"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the threat of adversarial attacks on machine learning in network security a survey"):
  with members:
    - "detecting cyberattacks in industrial control systems using convolutional neural networks"
    - "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning"
    - "an adaptive system for detecting malicious queries in web attacks"
    - "adversarial malware binaries evading deep learning for malware detection in executables"
    - "exploring adversarial examples in malware detection"
    - "is feature selection secure against training data poisoning"
    - "adversarially robust generalization requires more data"
    - "idsgan generative adversarial networks for attack generation against intrusion detection"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "investigating resistance of deep learning based ids against adversaries using min max optimization"):
  with members:
    - "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning"
    - "deep learning using rectified linear units relu"
    - "generating adversarial malware examples for black box attacks based on gan"
    - "adversarial examples in the physical world"
    - "intriguing properties of neural networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)