human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "segment integrated gradients better attributions through regions"
  Abstract: Saliency methods can aid understanding of deep neural networks. Recent years have witnessed many improvements to saliency methods, as well as new ways for evaluating them. In this paper, we 1) present a novel region-based attribution method, Segment-Integrated Gradients (SIG), that builds upon integrated gradients (Sundararajan et al. 2017), 2) introduce evaluation methods for empirically assessing the quality of image-based saliency maps (Performance Information Curves (PICs)), and 3) contribute an axiom-based sanity check for attribution methods. Through empirical experiments and example results, we show that SIG produces better results than other saliency methods for common models and the ImageNet dataset.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "explaining explanations axiomatic feature interactions for deep networks"):
  with members:
    - "proxy tasks and subjective measures can be misleading in evaluating explainable ai systems"
    - "on identifiability in transformers"
    - "distilbert a distilled version of bert smaller faster cheaper and lighter"
    - "learning pairwise interactions with bayesian neural networks"
    - "incorporating priors with feature attribution on text classification"
    - "learning explainable models using attribution priors"
    - "is attention interpretable"
    - "sanity checks for saliency metrics"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "trustworthy ai in the age of pervasive computing and big data"):
  with members:
    - "model cards for model reporting"
    - "decision provenance harnessing data flow for accountable systems"
    - "attention based prototypical learning towards interpretable confident and robust deep neural networks"
    - "a machine learning approach to prevent malicious calls over telephony networks"
    - "a style based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks"
    - "feature squeezing detecting adversarial examples in deep neural networks"
    - "blocking transferability of adversarial examples in black box learning systems"
    - "personalized and private peer to peer machine learning"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)