human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "minimax experimental design bridging the gap between statistical and worst case approaches to least squares regression"
  Abstract: In experimental design, we are given a large collection of vectors, each with a hidden response value that we assume derives from an underlying linear model, and we wish to pick a small subset of the vectors such that querying the corresponding responses will lead to a good estimator of the model. A classical approach in statistics is to assume the responses are linear, plus zero-mean i.i.d. Gaussian noise, in which case the goal is to provide an unbiased estimator with smallest mean squared error (A-optimal design). A related approach, more common in computer science, is to assume the responses are arbitrary but fixed, in which case the goal is to estimate the least squares solution using few responses, as quickly as possible, for worst-case inputs. Despite many attempts, characterizing the relationship between these two approaches has proven elusive. We address this by proposing a framework for experimental design where the responses are produced by an arbitrary unknown distribution. We show that there is an efficient randomized experimental design procedure that achieves strong variance bounds for an unbiased estimator using few responses in this general model. Nearly tight bounds for the classical A-optimality criterion, as well as improved bounds for worst-case responses, emerge as special cases of this result. In the process, we develop a new algorithm for a joint sampling distribution called volume sampling, and we propose a new i.i.d. importance sampling method: inverse score sampling. A key novelty of our analysis is in developing new expected error bounds for worst-case regression by controlling the tail behavior of i.i.d. sampling via the jointness of volume sampling. Our result motivates a new minimax-optimality criterion for experimental design which can be viewed as an extension of both A-optimal design and sampling for worst-case regression.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "improved guarantees and a multiple descent curve for the column subset selection problem and the nystr om method"):
  with members:
    - "two models of double descent for weak features"
    - "exact sampling of determinantal point processes with sublinear time preprocessing"
    - "bayesian experimental design using regularized determinantal point processes"
    - "exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random design"
    - "fast determinantal point processes via distortion free intermediate sampling"
    - "reverse iterative volume sampling for linear regression"
    - "monte carlo markov chain algorithms for sampling strongly rayleigh distributions and determinantal point processes"
    - "greedy column subset selection new bounds and distributed algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "exact expressions for double descent and implicit regularization via surrogate random design"):
  with members:
    - "understanding overfitting peaks in generalization error analytical risk curves for l 2 and l 1 penalized interpolation"
    - "traditional and heavy tailed self regularization in neural network models"
    - "two models of double descent for weak features"
    - "harmless interpolation of noisy data in regression"
    - "distributed estimation of the inverse hessian by determinantal averaging"
    - "implicit regularization in deep matrix factorization"
    - "bayesian experimental design using regularized determinantal point processes"
    - "implicit regularization in over parameterized neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "bayesian experimental design using regularized determinantal point processes"):
  with members:
    - "distributed estimation of the inverse hessian by determinantal averaging"
    - "correcting the bias in least squares regression with volume rescaled sampling"
    - "fast determinantal point processes via distortion free intermediate sampling"
    - "proportional volume sampling and approximation algorithms for a optimal design"
    - "reverse iterative volume sampling for linear regression"
    - "leveraged volume sampling for linear regression"
    - "lectures on randomized numerical linear algebra"
    - "guarantees for greedy maximization of non submodular functions with applications"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)