human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "adaptivity in adaptive submodularity"
  Abstract: Adaptive sequential decision making is one of the central challenges in machine learning and artificial intelligence. In such problems, the goal is to design an interactive policy that plans for an action to take, from a finite set of $n$ actions, given some partial observations. It has been shown that in many applications such as active learning, robotics, sequential experimental design, and active detection, the utility function satisfies adaptive submodularity, a notion that generalizes the notion of diminishing returns to policies. In this paper, we revisit the power of adaptivity in maximizing an adaptive monotone submodular function. We propose an efficient batch policy that with $O(\log n \times\log k)$ adaptive rounds of observations can achieve an almost tight $(1-1/e-\epsilon)$ approximation guarantee with respect to an optimal policy that carries out $k$ actions in a fully sequential setting. To complement our results, we also show that it is impossible to achieve a constant factor approximation with $o(\log n)$ adaptive rounds. We also extend our result to the case of adaptive stochastic minimum cost coverage where the goal is to reach a desired utility $Q$ with the cheapest policy. We first prove the conjecture by Golovin and Krause that the greedy policy achieves the asymptotically tight logarithmic approximation guarantee without resorting to stronger notions of adaptivity. We then propose a batch policy that provides the same guarantee in polylogarithmic adaptive rounds through a similar information-parallelism scheme. Our results shrink the adaptivity gap in adaptive submodular maximization by an exponential factor.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "regret bounds for batched bandits"):
  with members:
    - "batch policy learning under constraints"
    - "introduction to multi armed bandits"
    - "unconstrained submodular maximization with constant adaptive complexity"
    - "stochastic submodular cover with limited adaptivity"
    - "delay and cooperation in nonstochastic bandits"
    - "batched gaussian process bandit optimization via determinantal point processes"
    - "online learning with switching costs and other adaptive adversaries"
    - "parallel gaussian process optimization with upper confidence bound and pure exploration"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)