human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "how contextual are contextualized word representations comparing the geometry of bert elmo and gpt 2 embeddings"
  Abstract: Replacing static word embeddings with contextualized word representations has yielded significant improvements on many NLP tasks. However, just how contextual are the contextualized representations produced by models such as ELMo and BERT? Are there infinitely many context-specific representations for each word, or are words essentially assigned one of a finite number of word-sense representations? For one, we find that the contextualized representations of all words are not isotropic in any layer of the contextualizing model. While representations of the same word in different contexts still have a greater cosine similarity than those of two different words, this self-similarity is much lower in upper layers. This suggests that upper layers of contextualizing models produce more context-specific representations, much like how upper layers of LSTMs produce more task-specific representations. In all layers of ELMo, BERT, and GPT-2, on average, less than 5% of the variance in a word's contextualized representations can be explained by a static embedding for that word, providing some justification for the success of contextualized representations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity"):
  with members:
    - "multilingual alignment of contextual word representations"
    - "emerging cross lingual structure in pretrained language models"
    - "an empirical study on post processing methods for word embeddings"
    - "informing unsupervised pretraining with external linguistic knowledge"
    - "on the robustness of unsupervised and semi supervised cross lingual word embedding learning"
    - "word similarity datasets for thai construction and evaluation"
    - "paws paraphrase adversaries from word scrambling"
    - "cross lingual ability of multilingual bert an empirical study"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sbert wk a sentence embedding method by dissecting bert based word models"):
  with members:
    - "are sixteen heads really better than one"
    - "language models as knowledge bases"
    - "pitfalls in the evaluation of sentence embeddings"
    - "evaluating word embedding models methods and experimental results"
    - "sentence bert sentence embeddings using siamese bert networks"
    - "albert a lite bert for self supervised learning of language representations"
    - "revealing the dark secrets of bert"
    - "visualizing and understanding the effectiveness of bert"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "are pre trained language models aware of phrases simple but strong baselines for grammar induction"):
  with members:
    - "unsupervised recurrent neural network grammars"
    - "inducing syntactic trees from bert representations"
    - "analyzing multi head self attention specialized heads do the heavy lifting the rest can be pruned"
    - "compound probabilistic context free grammars for grammar induction"
    - "from balustrades to pierre vinken looking for syntax in transformer self attentions"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "unsupervised latent tree induction with deep inside outside recursive autoencoders"
    - "an imitation learning approach to unsupervised parsing"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "bert as a teacher contextual embeddings for sequence level reward"):
  with members:
    - "visualizing and measuring the geometry of bert"
    - "the curious case of neural text degeneration"
    - "bertscore evaluating text generation with bert"
    - "on the use of bert for neural machine translation"
    - "discofuse a large scale dataset for discourse based sentence fusion"
    - "bert has a mouth and it must speak bert as a markov random field language model"
    - "generalization in generation a closer look at exposure bias"
    - "moverscore text generation evaluating with contextualized embeddings and earth mover distance"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)