human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "linearizable state machine replication of state based crdts without logs"
  Abstract: General solutions of state machine replication have to ensure that all replicas apply the same commands in the same order, even in the presence of failures. Such strict ordering incurs high synchronization costs caused by distributed consensus or by the use of a leader. #R##N#This paper presents a protocol for linearizable state machine replication of conflict-free replicated data types (CRDTs) that neither requires consensus nor a leader. By leveraging the properties of state-based CRDTs - in particular the monotonic growth of a join semilattice - synchronization overhead is greatly reduced. In addition, updates just need a single round trip and modify the state `in-place' without the need for a log. Furthermore, the message size overhead for coordination consists of a single counter per message. While reads in the presence of concurrent updates are not wait-free without a coordinator, we show that more than 97% of reads can be handled in one or two round trips under highly concurrent accesses. #R##N#Our protocol achieves high throughput without auxiliary processes like command log management or leader election. It is well suited for all practical scenarios that need linearizable access on CRDT data on a fine-granular scale.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "synchronous byzantine lattice agreement in o log f rounds"):
  with members:
    - "byzantine approximate agreement on graphs"
    - "byzantine lattice agreement in synchronous systems"
    - "byzantine generalized lattice agreement"
    - "lattice agreement in message passing systems"
    - "line recovery by programmable particles"
    - "population protocols with faulty interactions the impact of a leader"
    - "simple gradecast based algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "byzantine lattice agreement in synchronous systems"):
  with members:
    - "synchronous byzantine lattice agreement in o log f rounds"
    - "byzantine approximate agreement on graphs"
    - "byzantine generalized lattice agreement"
    - "lattice agreement in message passing systems"
    - "linearizable replicated state machines with lattice agreement"
    - "simple gradecast based algorithms"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)