human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "disentangling feature and lazy training in deep neural networks"
  Abstract: Two distinct limits for deep learning have been derived as the network width $h\rightarrow \infty$, depending on how the weights of the last layer scale with $h$. In the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) limit, the dynamics becomes linear in the weights and is described by a frozen kernel $\Theta$ (the NTK). By contrast, in the Mean Field limit, the dynamics can be expressed in terms of the distribution of the parameters associated to a neuron, that follows a partial differential equation. In this work we consider deep networks where the weights in the last layer scale as $\alpha h^{-1/2}$ at initialization. By varying $\alpha$ and $h$, we probe the crossover between the two limits. We observe two regimes that we call "lazy training" and "feature training". In the lazy-training regime, the dynamics is almost linear and the NTK does barely change after initialization. The feature-training regime includes the mean-field formulation as a limiting case and is characterized by a kernel that evolves in time, and thus learns some features. We perform numerical experiments on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, EMNIST and CIFAR10 and consider various architectures. We find that: (i) The two regimes are separated by an $\alpha^*$ that scales as $\frac{1}{\sqrt{h}}$. (ii) Network architecture and data structure play an important role in determining which regime is better: in our tests, fully-connected networks generally perform better in the lazy-training regime (except when we reduce the dataset via PCA), and we provide an example of a convolutional network that achieves a lower error in the feature-training regime. (iii) In both regimes, the fluctuations $\delta F$ induced by initial conditions on the learned function decay as $\delta F \sim 1/\sqrt{h}$, leading to a performance that increases with $h$. (iv) In the feature-training regime we identify a time scale $t_1 \sim \sqrt{h}\alpha$

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)