human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "variance preserving initialization schemes improve deep network training but which variance is preserved"
  Abstract: Before training a neural net, a classic rule of thumb is to randomly initialize the weights so that the variance of the preactivation is preserved across all layers. This is traditionally interpreted using the total variance due to randomness in both networks (weights) and samples. Alternatively, one can interpret the rule of thumb as preservation of the \emph{sample} mean and variance for a fixed network, i.e., preactivation statistics computed over the random sample of training samples. The two interpretations differ little for a shallow net, but the difference is shown to be large for a deep ReLU net by decomposing the total variance into the network-averaged sum of the sample variance and square of the sample mean. We demonstrate that the latter term dominates in the later layers through an analytical calculation in the limit of infinite network width, and numerical simulations for finite width. Our experimental results from training neural nets support the idea that preserving sample statistics can be better than preserving total variance. We discuss the implications for the alternative rule of thumb that a network should be initialized to be at the "edge of chaos."

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "neural networks are a priori biased towards boolean functions with low entropy"):
  with members:
    - "sample variance decay in randomly initialized relu networks"
    - "scaling limits of wide neural networks with weight sharing gaussian process behavior gradient independence and neural tangent kernel derivation"
    - "a fine grained spectral perspective on neural networks"
    - "towards understanding generalization of deep learning perspective of loss landscapes"
    - "understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization"
    - "google s neural machine translation system bridging the gap between human and machine translation"
    - "batch normalization accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)