human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a kernelized manifold mapping to diminish the effect of adversarial perturbations"
  Abstract: The linear and non-flexible nature of deep convolutional models makes them vulnerable to carefully crafted adversarial perturbations. To tackle this problem, we propose a non-linear radial basis convolutional feature mapping by learning a Mahalanobis-like distance function. Our method then maps the convolutional features onto a linearly well-separated manifold, which prevents small adversarial perturbations from forcing a sample to cross the decision boundary. We test the proposed method on three publicly available image classification and segmentation datasets namely, MNIST, ISBI ISIC 2017 skin lesion segmentation, and NIH Chest X-Ray-14. We evaluate the robustness of our method to different gradient (targeted and untargeted) and non-gradient based attacks and compare it to several non-gradient masking defense strategies. Our results demonstrate that the proposed method can increase the resilience of deep convolutional neural networks to adversarial perturbations without accuracy drop on clean data.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial perturbations prevail in the y channel of the ycbcr color space"):
  with members:
    - "jumprelu a retrofit defense strategy for adversarial attacks"
    - "an empirical investigation of randomized defenses against adversarial attacks"
    - "robust neural networks using randomized adversarial training"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "deep learning for single image super resolution a brief review"
    - "deep learning for multiple image super resolution"
    - "sampling and super resolution of sparse signals beyond the fourier domain"
    - "deep learning for image super resolution a survey"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter free attacks"):
  with members:
    - "fast is better than free revisiting adversarial training"
    - "adversarial defense by restricting the hidden space of deep neural networks"
    - "controlling neural level sets"
    - "metric learning for adversarial robustness"
    - "certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing"
    - "your classifier is secretly an energy based model and you should treat it like one"
    - "an alternative surrogate loss for pgd based adversarial testing"
    - "jacobian adversarially regularized networks for robustness"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "robust deep neural networks inspired by fuzzy logic"):
  with members:
    - "adversarial defense by restricting the hidden space of deep neural networks"
    - "adversarial examples are a natural consequence of test error in noise"
    - "understanding adversarial robustness the trade off between minimum and average margin"
    - "adversarial training versus weight decay"
    - "sparse dnns with improved adversarial robustness"
    - "neural networks should be wide enough to learn disconnected decision regions"
    - "adversarially robust generalization requires more data"
    - "provable robustness of relu networks via maximization of linear regions"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "self supervised adversarial training"):
  with members:
    - "on mutual information maximization for representation learning"
    - "using self supervised learning can improve model robustness and uncertainty"
    - "learning representations by maximizing mutual information across views"
    - "defending against adversarial examples with k nearest neighbor"
    - "unsupervised feature learning via non parametric instance level discrimination"
    - "feature denoising for improving adversarial robustness"
    - "adversarial logit pairing"
    - "comdefend an efficient image compression model to defend adversarial examples"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)