human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "online hierarchical clustering approximations"
  Abstract: Hierarchical clustering is a widely used approach for clustering datasets at multiple levels of granularity. Despite its popularity, existing algorithms such as hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC) are limited to the offline setting, and thus require the entire dataset to be available. This prohibits their use on large datasets commonly encountered in modern learning applications. In this paper, we consider hierarchical clustering in the online setting, where points arrive one at a time. We propose two algorithms that seek to optimize the Moseley and Wang (MW) revenue function, a variant of the Dasgupta cost. These algorithms offer different tradeoffs between efficiency and MW revenue performance. The first algorithm, OTD, is a highly efficient Online Top Down algorithm which provably achieves a 1/3-approximation to the MW revenue under a data separation assumption. The second algorithm, OHAC, is an online counterpart to offline HAC, which is known to yield a 1/3-approximation to the MW revenue, and produce good quality clusters in practice. We show that OHAC approximates offline HAC by leveraging a novel split-merge procedure. We empirically show that OTD and OHAC offer significant efficiency and cluster quality gains respectively over baselines.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "spocc scalable possibilistic classifier combination toward robust aggregation of classifiers"):
  with members:
    - "federated learning with unbiased gradient aggregation and controllable meta updating"
    - "on single source robustness in deep fusion models"
    - "rsa byzantine robust stochastic aggregation methods for distributed learning from heterogeneous datasets"
    - "possibilistic logic bases and possibilistic graphs"
    - "automated reasoning using possibilistic logic semantics belief revision and variable certainty weights"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)