human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "tight bounds for the subspace sketch problem with applications"
  Abstract: In the subspace sketch problem one is given an $n\times d$ matrix $A$ with $O(\log(nd))$ bit entries, and would like to compress it in an arbitrary way to build a small space data structure $Q_p$, so that for any given $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$, with probability at least $2/3$, one has $Q_p(x)=(1\pm\epsilon)\|Ax\|_p$, where $p\geq 0$, and where the randomness is over the construction of $Q_p$. The central question is: How many bits are necessary to store $Q_p$? #R##N#This problem has applications to the communication of approximating the number of non-zeros in a matrix product, the size of coresets in projective clustering, the memory of streaming algorithms for regression in the row-update model, and embedding subspaces of $L_p$ in functional analysis. A major open question is the dependence on the approximation factor $\epsilon$. #R##N#We show if $p\geq 0$ is not a positive even integer and $d=\Omega(\log(1/\epsilon))$, then $\tilde{\Omega}(\epsilon^{-2}d)$ bits are necessary. On the other hand, if $p$ is a positive even integer, then there is an upper bound of $O(d^p\log(nd))$ bits independent of $\epsilon$. Our results are optimal up to logarithmic factors, and show in particular that one cannot compress $A$ to $O(d)$ "directions" $v_1,\dots,v_{O(d)}$, such that for any $x$, $\|Ax\|_1$ can be well-approximated from $\langle v_1,x\rangle,\dots,\langle v_{O(d)},x\rangle$. Our lower bound rules out arbitrary functions of these inner products (and in fact arbitrary data structures built from $A$), and thus rules out the possibility of a singular value decomposition for $\ell_1$ in a very strong sense. Indeed, as $\epsilon\to 0$, for $p = 1$ the space complexity becomes arbitrarily large, while for $p = 2$ it is at most $O(d^2 \log(nd))$. As corollaries of our main lower bound, we obtain new lower bounds for a wide range of applications, including the above, which in many cases are optimal.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing"):
  with members:
    - "solving tall dense linear programs in nearly linear time"
    - "optimal sketching for kronecker product regression and low rank approximation"
    - "a near optimal algorithm for approximating the john ellipsoid"
    - "regularized weighted low rank approximation"
    - "robust and sample optimal algorithms for psd low rank approximation"
    - "dimensionality reduction for tukey regression"
    - "total least squares regression in input sparsity time"
    - "sample optimal low rank approximation of distance matrices"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "total least squares regression in input sparsity time"):
  with members:
    - "solving empirical risk minimization in the current matrix multiplication time"
    - "optimal sketching for kronecker product regression and low rank approximation"
    - "a near optimal algorithm for approximating the john ellipsoid"
    - "dimensionality reduction for tukey regression"
    - "solving linear programs in the current matrix multiplication time"
    - "subspace embedding and linear regression with orlicz norm"
    - "relative error tensor low rank approximation"
    - "near optimal sketching of low rank tensor regression"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "dimensionality reduction for tukey regression"):
  with members:
    - "tight bounds for ell_p oblivious subspace embeddings"
    - "input sparsity and hardness for robust subspace approximation"
    - "robust optimization for deep regression"
    - "sketching as a tool for numerical linear algebra"
    - "quantile regression for large scale applications"
    - "low rank approximation and regression in input sparsity time"
    - "iterative row sampling"
    - "osnap faster numerical linear algebra algorithms via sparser subspace embeddings"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)