human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "evaluating explanation without ground truth in interpretable machine learning"
  Abstract: Interpretable Machine Learning (IML) has become increasingly important in many real-world applications, such as autonomous cars and medical diagnosis, where explanations are significantly preferred to help people better understand how machine learning systems work and further enhance their trust towards systems. However, due to the diversified scenarios and subjective nature of explanations, we rarely have the ground truth for benchmark evaluation in IML on the quality of generated explanations. Having a sense of explanation quality not only matters for assessing system boundaries, but also helps to realize the true benefits to human users in practical settings. To benchmark the evaluation in IML, in this article, we rigorously define the problem of evaluating explanations, and systematically review the existing efforts from state-of-the-arts. Specifically, we summarize three general aspects of explanation (i.e., generalizability, fidelity and persuasibility) with formal definitions, and respectively review the representative methodologies for each of them under different tasks. Further, a unified evaluation framework is designed according to the hierarchical needs from developers and end-users, which could be easily adopted for different scenarios in practice. In the end, open problems are discussed, and several limitations of current evaluation techniques are raised for future explorations.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on completeness aware concept based explanations in deep neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "educe explaining model decisions through unsupervised concepts extraction"
    - "unsupervised speech representation learning using wavenet autoencoders"
    - "attention based prototypical learning towards interpretable confident and robust deep neural networks"
    - "challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations"
    - "representer point selection for explaining deep neural networks"
    - "explaining explanations an overview of interpretability of machine learning"
    - "learning to generate reviews and discovering sentiment"
    - "l shapley and c shapley efficient model interpretation for structured data"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning credible deep neural networks with rationale regularization"):
  with members:
    - "on attribution of recurrent neural network predictions via additive decomposition"
    - "towards explanation of dnn based prediction with guided feature inversion"
    - "investigating backtranslation in neural machine translation"
    - "women also snowboard overcoming bias in captioning models"
    - "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data"
    - "knowledgeable reader enhancing cloze style reading comprehension with external commonsense knowledge"
    - "techniques for interpretable machine learning"
    - "know what you don t know unanswerable questions for squad"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "towards a unified evaluation of explanation methods without ground truth"):
  with members:
    - "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization"
    - "evaluating explainers via perturbation"
    - "can i trust the explainer verifying post hoc explanatory methods"
    - "bim towards quantitative evaluation of interpretability methods with ground truth"
    - "evaluating recurrent neural network explanations"
    - "net2vec quantifying and explaining how concepts are encoded by filters in deep neural networks"
    - "towards robust interpretability with self explaining neural networks"
    - "l shapley and c shapley efficient model interpretation for structured data"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "consensus based interpretable deep neural networks with application to mortality prediction"):
  with members:
    - "assessing the local interpretability of machine learning models"
    - "learning and generalization in overparameterized neural networks going beyond two layers"
    - "deep ehr a survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques for electronic health record ehr analysis"
    - "techniques for interpretable machine learning"
    - "towards understanding the role of over parametrization in generalization of neural networks"
    - "building computational models to predict one year mortality in icu patients with acute myocardial infarction and post myocardial infarction syndrome"
    - "towards understanding generalization of deep learning perspective of loss landscapes"
    - "axiomatic attribution for deep networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)