human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "scalable dictionary classifiers for time series classification"
  Abstract: Dictionary based classifiers are a family of algorithms for time series classification (TSC), that focus on capturing the frequency of pattern occurrences in a time series. The ensemble based Bag of Symbolic Fourier Approximation Symbols (BOSS) was found to be a top performing TSC algorithm in a recent evaluation, as well as the best performing dictionary based classifier. A recent addition to the category, the Word Extraction for Time Series Classification (WEASEL), claims an improvement on this performance. Both of these algorithms however have non-trivial scalability issues, taking a considerable amount of build time and space on larger datasets. We evaluate changes to the way BOSS chooses classifiers for its ensemble, replacing its parameter search with random selection. This change allows for the easy implementation of contracting, setting a build time limit for the classifier and check-pointing, saving progress during the classifiers build. To differentiate between the two BOSS ensemble methods we refer to our randomised version as RBOSS. Additionally we test the application of common ensembling techniques to help retain accuracy from the loss of the BOSS parameter search. We achieve a significant reduction in build time without a significant change in accuracy on average when compared to BOSS by creating a size $n$ weighted ensemble selecting the best performers from $k$ randomly chosen parameter sets. Our experiments are conducted on datasets from the recently expanded UCR time series archive. We demonstrate the usability improvements to RBOSS with a case study using a large whale acoustics dataset for which BOSS proved infeasible.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "ts chief a scalable and accurate forest algorithm for time series classification"):
  with members:
    - "deep learning for time series classification a review"
    - "proximity forest an effective and scalable distance based classifier for time series"
    - "deep learning for sensor based activity recognition a survey"
    - "temporal convolutional neural network for the classification of satellite image time series"
    - "from bop to boss and beyond time series classification with dictionary based classifiers"
    - "scalable and accurate deep learning for electronic health records"
    - "the ucr time series archive"
    - "fast and accurate time series classification with weasel"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a tale of two toolkits report the first benchmarking time series classification algorithms for correctness and efficiency"):
  with members:
    - "sktime a unified interface for machine learning with time series"
    - "ts chief a scalable and accurate forest algorithm for time series classification"
    - "proximity forest an effective and scalable distance based classifier for time series"
    - "the ucr time series archive"
    - "is rotation forest the best classifier for problems with continuous features"
    - "fast and accurate time series classification with weasel"
    - "a time series forest for classification and feature extraction"
    - "time warp edit distance with stiffness adjustment for time series matching"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a tale of two toolkits report the second bake off redux chapter 1 dictionary based classifiers"):
  with members:
    - "sktime a unified interface for machine learning with time series"
    - "a tale of two toolkits report the first benchmarking time series classification algorithms for correctness and efficiency"
    - "the ucr time series archive"
    - "fast and accurate time series classification with weasel"
    - "simulated data experiments for time series classification part 1 accuracy comparison with default settings"
    - "should we really use post hoc tests based on mean ranks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)