human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "fire des enhanced online pruning of base classifiers for dynamic ensemble selection"
  Abstract: Abstract   Dynamic Ensemble Selection (DES) techniques aim to select one or more competent classifiers for the classification of each new test sample. Most DES techniques estimate the competence of classifiers using a given criterion over the region of competence of the test sample, usually defined as the set of nearest neighbors of the test sample in the validation set. Despite being very effective in several classification tasks, DES techniques can select classifiers that classify all samples in the region of competence as being from the same class. The Frienemy Indecision REgion DES (FIRE-DES) tackles this problem by pre-selecting classifiers that correctly classify at least one pair of samples from different classes in the region of competence of the test sample. However, FIRE-DES applies the pre-selection for the classification of a test sample if and only if its region of competence is composed of samples from different classes (indecision region), even though this criterion is not reliable for determining if a test sample is located close to the borders of classes (true indecision region) when the region of competence is obtained using classical nearest neighbors approach. Because of that, FIRE-DES mistakes noisy regions for true indecision regions, leading to the pre-selection of incompetent classifiers, and mistakes true indecision regions for safe regions, leaving samples in such regions without any pre-selection. To tackle these issues, we propose the FIRE-DES++, an enhanced FIRE-DES that removes noise and reduces the overlap of classes in the validation set; and defines the region of competence using an equal number of samples of each class, avoiding selecting a region of competence with samples of a single class. Experiments are conducted using FIRE-DES++ with 8 different dynamic selection techniques on 64 classification datasets. Experimental results show that FIRE-DES++ increases the classification performance of all DES techniques considered in this work, outperforming FIRE-DES with 7 out of the 8 DES techniques, and outperforming state-of-the-art DES frameworks.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "deslib a dynamic ensemble selection library in python"):
  with members:
    - "meta des h a dynamic ensemble selection technique using meta learning and a dynamic weighting approach"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)