human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "robust and sample optimal algorithms for psd low rank approximation"
  Abstract: Recently, Musco and Woodruff (FOCS, 2017) showed that given an $n \times n$ positive semidefinite (PSD) matrix $A$, it is possible to compute a relative-error $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate low-rank approximation to $A$ by querying $\widetilde{O}(nk/\epsilon^{2.5})$ entries of $A$ in time $\widetilde{O}(nk/\epsilon^{2.5} +n k^{\omega-1}/\epsilon^{2(\omega-1)})$. They also showed that any relative-error low-rank approximation algorithm must query $\widetilde{\Omega}(nk/\epsilon)$ entries of $A$, and closing this gap is an important open question. Our main result is to resolve this question by showing an algorithm that queries an optimal $\widetilde{O}(nk/\epsilon)$ entries of $A$ and outputs a relative-error low-rank approximation in $\widetilde{O}(n\cdot(k/\epsilon)^{\omega-1})$ time. Note, our running time improves that of Musco and Woodruff, and matches the information-theoretic lower bound if the matrix-multiplication exponent $\omega$ is $2$. #R##N#Next, we introduce a new robust low-rank approximation model which captures PSD matrices that have been corrupted with noise. We assume that the Frobenius norm of the corruption is bounded. Here, we relax the notion of approximation to additive-error, since it is information-theoretically impossible to obtain a relative-error approximation in this setting. While a sample complexity lower bound precludes sublinear algorithms for arbitrary PSD matices, we provide the first sublinear time and query algorithms when the corruption on the diagonal entries is bounded. As a special case, we show sample-optimal sublinear time algorithms for low-rank approximation of correlation matrices corrupted by noise.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing"):
  with members:
    - "solving tall dense linear programs in nearly linear time"
    - "tight bounds for the subspace sketch problem with applications"
    - "optimal sketching for kronecker product regression and low rank approximation"
    - "a near optimal algorithm for approximating the john ellipsoid"
    - "regularized weighted low rank approximation"
    - "dimensionality reduction for tukey regression"
    - "total least squares regression in input sparsity time"
    - "sample optimal low rank approximation of distance matrices"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)