human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "fast and accurate sparse coding of visual stimuli with a simple ultralow energy spiking architecture"
  Abstract: Memristive crossbars have become a popular means for realizing unsupervised and supervised learning techniques. In previous neuromorphic architectures with leaky integrate-and-fire neurons, the crossbar itself has been separated from the neuron capacitors to preserve mathematical rigor. In this paper, we sought to design a simplified sparse coding circuit without this restriction, resulting in a fast circuit that approximated a sparse coding operation at a minimal loss in accuracy. We showed that connecting the neurons directly to the crossbar resulted in a more energy-efficient sparse coding architecture and alleviated the need to prenormalize receptive fields. This paper provides derivations for the design of such a network, named the simple spiking locally competitive algorithm, as well as CMOS designs and results on the CIFAR and MNIST data sets. Compared to a nonspiking, nonapproximate model which scored 33% on CIFAR-10 with a single-layer classifier, this hardware scored 32% accuracy. When used with a state-of-the-art deep learning classifier, the nonspiking model achieved 82% and our simplified, spiking model achieved 80% while compressing the input data by 92%. Compared to a previously proposed spiking model, our proposed hardware consumed 99% less energy to do the same work at 21    $\times $    the throughput. Accuracy held out with online learning to a write variance of 3%, suitable for the often reported 4-bit resolution required for neuromorphic algorithms, with offline learning to a write variance of 27%, and with read variance to 40%. The proposed architecture’s excellent accuracy, throughput, and significantly lower energy usage demonstrate the utility of our innovations.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.ET(Emerging Technologies)