human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in ai assisted decision making"
  Abstract: Today, AI is being increasingly used to help human experts make decisions in high-stakes scenarios. In these scenarios, full automation is often undesirable, not only due to the significance of the outcome, but also because human experts can draw on their domain knowledge complementary to the model's to ensure task success. We refer to these scenarios as AI-assisted decision making, where the individual strengths of the human and the AI come together to optimize the joint decision outcome. A key to their success is to appropriately \textit{calibrate} human trust in the AI on a case-by-case basis; knowing when to trust or distrust the AI allows the human expert to appropriately apply their knowledge, improving decision outcomes in cases where the model is likely to perform poorly. This research conducts a case study of AI-assisted decision making in which humans and AI have comparable performance alone, and explores whether features that reveal case-specific model information can calibrate trust and improve the joint performance of the human and AI. Specifically, we study the effect of showing confidence score and local explanation for a particular prediction. Through two human experiments, we show that confidence score can help calibrate people's trust in an AI model, but trust calibration alone is not sufficient to improve AI-assisted decision making, which may also depend on whether the human can bring in enough unique knowledge to complement the AI's errors. We also highlight the problems in using local explanation for AI-assisted decision making scenarios and invite the research community to explore new approaches to explainability for calibrating human trust in AI.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "trust in automl exploring information needs for establishing trust in automated machine learning systems"):
  with members:
    - "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences"
    - "one explanation does not fit all a toolkit and taxonomy of ai explainability techniques"
    - "an admm based framework for automl pipeline configuration"
    - "conditional parallel coordinates"
    - "atmseer increasing transparency and controllability in automated machine learning"
    - "human ai collaboration in data science exploring data scientists perceptions of automated ai"
    - "survey on automated machine learning"
    - "metrics for explainable ai challenges and prospects"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "autoaiviz opening the blackbox of automated artificial intelligence with conditional parallel coordinates"):
  with members:
    - "how do data science workers collaborate roles workflows and tools"
    - "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences"
    - "model cards for model reporting"
    - "how data scientistswork together with domain experts in scientific collaborations to find the right answer or to ask the right question"
    - "an admm based framework for automl pipeline configuration"
    - "conditional parallel coordinates"
    - "atmseer increasing transparency and controllability in automated machine learning"
    - "human ai collaboration in data science exploring data scientists perceptions of automated ai"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "how do data science workers collaborate roles workflows and tools"):
  with members:
    - "autoaiviz opening the blackbox of automated artificial intelligence with conditional parallel coordinates"
    - "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences"
    - "an admm based framework for automl pipeline configuration"
    - "survey on automated machine learning"
    - "datasheets for datasets"
    - "trust in data science collaboration translation and accountability in corporate data science projects"
    - "data vision learning to see through algorithmic abstraction"
    - "datahub collaborative data science dataset version management at scale"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)