human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "intrusion detection mechanism using fuzzy rule interpolation"
  Abstract: Fuzzy Rule Interpolation (FRI) methods can serve deducible (interpolated) conclusions even in case if some situations are not explicitly defined in a fuzzy rule based knowledge representation. This property can be beneficial in partial heuristically solved applications; there the efficiency of expert knowledge representation is mixed with the precision of machine learning methods. The goal of this paper is to introduce the benefits of FRI in the Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) application area, in the design and implementation of the detection mechanism for Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attacks. In the example of the paper as a test-bed environment an open source DDOS dataset and the General Public License (GNU) FRI Toolbox was applied. The performance of the FRI-IDS example application is compared to other common classification algorithms used for detecting DDOS attacks on the same open source test-bed environment. According to the results, the overall detection rate of the FRI-IDS is in pair with other methods. On the example dataset it outperforms the detection rate of the support vector machine algorithm, whereas other algorithms (neural network, random forest and decision tree) recorded lightly higher detection rate. Consequently, the FRI inference system could be a suitable approach to be implemented as a detection mechanism for IDS; it effectively decreases the false positive rate value. Moreover, because of its fuzzy rule base knowledge representation nature, it can easily adapt expert knowledge, and also be-suitable for predicting the level of degree for threat possibility.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "intelligent methods for accurately detecting phishing websites"):
  with members:
    - "fuzzy rule interpolation and snmp mib for emerging network abnormality"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "fuzzy rule interpolation toolbox for the gnu open source octave"):
  with members:
    - "some considerations and a benchmark related to the cnf property of the koczy hirota fuzzy rule interpolation"
    - "fuzzy rule interpolation methods and fri toolbox"
    - "investigating the piece wise linearity and benchmark related to koczy hirota fuzzy linear interpolation"
    - "fuzzy rule interpolation and snmp mib for emerging network abnormality"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)