human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "curriculum loss robust learning and generalization against label corruption"
  Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have great expressive power, which can even memorize samples with wrong labels. It is vitally important to reiterate robustness and generalization in DNNs against label corruption. To this end, this paper studies the 0-1 loss, which has a monotonic relationship with an empirical adversary (reweighted) risk~\citep{hu2016does}. Although the 0-1 loss has some robust properties, it is difficult to optimize. To efficiently optimize the 0-1 loss while keeping its robust properties, we propose a very simple and efficient loss, i.e. curriculum loss (CL). Our CL is a tighter upper bound of the 0-1 loss compared with conventional summation based surrogate losses. Moreover, CL can adaptively select samples for model training. As a result, our loss can be deemed as a novel perspective of curriculum sample selection strategy, which bridges a connection between curriculum learning and robust learning. Experimental results on benchmark datasets validate the robustness of the proposed loss.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "learning adaptive loss for robust learning with noisy labels"):
  with members:
    - "symmetric cross entropy for robust learning with noisy labels"
    - "addressing the loss metric mismatch with adaptive loss alignment"
    - "l_dmi an information theoretic noise robust loss function"
    - "learning surrogate losses"
    - "meta weight net learning an explicit mapping for sample weighting"
    - "robust bi tempered logistic loss based on bregman divergences"
    - "joint optimization framework for learning with noisy labels"
    - "learning to reweight examples for robust deep learning"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "robust binary classification with the 01 loss"):
  with members:
    - "hopskipjumpattack a query efficient decision based attack"
    - "theoretically principled trade off between robustness and accuracy"
    - "adversarial training can hurt generalization"
    - "darts deceiving autonomous cars with toxic signs"
    - "attacking binarized neural networks"
    - "practical black box attacks against machine learning"
    - "transferability in machine learning from phenomena to black box attacks using adversarial samples"
    - "towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)