human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "investigating bert s knowledge of language five analysis methods with npis"
  Abstract: Though state-of-the-art sentence representation models can perform tasks requiring significant knowledge of grammar, it is an open question how best to evaluate their grammatical knowledge. We explore five experimental methods inspired by prior work evaluating pretrained sentence representation models. We use a single linguistic phenomenon, negative polarity item (NPI) licensing in English, as a case study for our experiments. NPIs like "any" are grammatical only if they appear in a licensing environment like negation ("Sue doesn't have any cats" vs. "Sue has any cats"). This phenomenon is challenging because of the variety of NPI licensing environments that exist. We introduce an artificially generated dataset that manipulates key features of NPI licensing for the experiments. We find that BERT has significant knowledge of these features, but its success varies widely across different experimental methods. We conclude that a variety of methods is necessary to reveal all relevant aspects of a model's grammatical knowledge in a given domain.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "olmpics on what language model pre training captures"):
  with members:
    - "what bert is not lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language models"
    - "visualizing and measuring the geometry of bert"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "still a pain in the neck evaluating text representations on lexical composition"
    - "do nlp models know numbers probing numeracy in embeddings"
    - "learning and evaluating general linguistic intelligence"
    - "diversify your datasets analyzing generalization via controlled variance in adversarial datasets"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "what does my qa model know devising controlled probes using expert knowledge"):
  with members:
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "overcoming catastrophic forgetting by neuron level plasticity control"
    - "abductive commonsense reasoning"
    - "inoculation by fine tuning a method for analyzing challenge datasets"
    - "from f to a on the n y regents science exams an overview of the aristo project"
    - "diversify your datasets analyzing generalization via controlled variance in adversarial datasets"
    - "qasc a dataset for question answering via sentence composition"
    - "wic the word in context dataset for evaluating context sensitive meaning representations"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "probing natural language inference models through semantic fragments"):
  with members:
    - "can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning"
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "monalog a lightweight system for natural language inference based on monotonicity"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "inoculation by fine tuning a method for analyzing challenge datasets"
    - "correlating neural and symbolic representations of language"
    - "a logical based corpus for cross lingual evaluation"
    - "posing fair generalization tasks for natural language inference"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "what does bert learn from multiple choice reading comprehension datasets"):
  with members:
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "to tune or not to tune adapting pretrained representations to diverse tasks"
    - "do neural dialog systems use the conversation history effectively an empirical study"
    - "albert a lite bert for self supervised learning of language representations"
    - "universal adversarial triggers for attacking and analyzing nlp"
    - "dream a challenge dataset and models for dialogue based reading comprehension"
    - "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "do attention heads in bert track syntactic dependencies"):
  with members:
    - "analyzing multi head self attention specialized heads do the heavy lifting the rest can be pruned"
    - "assessing bert s syntactic abilities"
    - "bert rediscovers the classical nlp pipeline"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "open sesame getting inside bert s linguistic knowledge"
    - "no training required exploring random encoders for sentence classification"
    - "what does bert look at an analysis of bert s attention"
    - "superglue a stickier benchmark for general purpose language understanding systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "blimp a benchmark of linguistic minimal pairs for english"):
  with members:
    - "exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text to text transformer"
    - "grammatical analysis of pretrained sentence encoders with acceptability judgments"
    - "transformer xl attentive language models beyond a fixed length context"
    - "representation of constituents in neural language models coordination phrase as a case study"
    - "structural supervision improves learning of non local grammatical dependencies"
    - "what do rnn language models learn about filler gap dependencies"
    - "assessing composition in sentence vector representations"
    - "rnns as psycholinguistic subjects syntactic state and grammatical dependency"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)