human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on chip learning in a conventional silicon mosfet based analog hardware neural network"
  Abstract: On-chip learning in a crossbar array based analog hardware Neural Network (NN) has been shown to have major advantages in terms of speed and energy compared to training NN on a traditional computer. However analog hardware NN proposals and implementations thus far have mostly involved Non Volatile Memory (NVM) devices like Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM), Phase Change Memory (PCM), spintronic devices or floating gate transistors as synapses. Fabricating systems based on RRAM, PCM or spintronic devices need in-house laboratory facilities and cannot be done through merchant foundries, unlike conventional silicon based CMOS chips. Floating gate transistors need large voltage pulses for weight update, making on-chip learning in such systems energy inefficient. This paper proposes and implements through SPICE simulations on-chip learning in analog hardware NN using only conventional silicon based MOSFETs (without any floating gate) as synapses since they are easy to fabricate. We first model the synaptic characteristic of our single transistor synapse using SPICE circuit simulator and benchmark it against experimentally obtained current-voltage characteristics of a transistor. Next we design a Fully Connected Neural Network (FCNN) crossbar array using such transistor synapses. We also design analog peripheral circuits for neuron and synaptic weight update calculation, needed for on-chip learning, again using conventional transistors. Simulating the entire system on SPICE simulator, we obtain high training and test accuracy on the standard Fisher's Iris dataset, widely used in machine learning. We also compare the speed and energy performance of our transistor based implementation of analog hardware NN with some previous implementations of NN with NVM devices and show comparable performance with respect to on-chip learning.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)