human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "neural graph embedding methods for natural language processing"
  Abstract: Knowledge graphs are structured representations of facts in a graph, where nodes represent entities and edges represent relationships between them. Recent research has resulted in the development of several large KGs. However, all of them tend to be sparse with very few facts per entity. In the first part of the thesis, we propose three solutions to alleviate this problem: (1) KG Canonicalization, i.e., identifying and merging duplicate entities in a KG, (2) Relation Extraction which involves automating the process of extracting semantic relationships between entities from unstructured text, and (3) Link prediction which includes inferring missing facts based on the known facts in a KG. Traditional Neural Networks like CNNs and RNNs are constrained to handle Euclidean data. However, graphs in Natural Language Processing (NLP) are prominent. Recently, Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) have been proposed to address this shortcoming and have been successfully applied for several problems. In the second part of the thesis, we utilize GCNs for Document Timestamping problem and for learning word embeddings using dependency context of a word instead of sequential context. In this third part of the thesis, we address two limitations of existing GCN models, i.e., (1) The standard neighborhood aggregation scheme puts no constraints on the number of nodes that can influence the representation of a target node. This leads to a noisy representation of hub-nodes which coves almost the entire graph in a few hops. (2) Most of the existing GCN models are limited to handle undirected graphs. However, a more general and pervasive class of graphs are relational graphs where each edge has a label and direction associated with it. Existing approaches to handle such graphs suffer from over-parameterization and are restricted to learning representation of nodes only.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)