human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "human grounded evaluations of explanation methods for text classification"
  Abstract: Due to the black-box nature of deep learning models, methods for explaining the models' results are crucial to gain trust from humans and support collaboration between AIs and humans. In this paper, we consider several model-agnostic and model-specific explanation methods for CNNs for text classification and conduct three human-grounded evaluations, focusing on different purposes of explanations: (1) revealing model behavior, (2) justifying model predictions, and (3) helping humans investigate uncertain predictions. The results highlight dissimilar qualities of the various explanation methods we consider and show the degree to which these methods could serve for each purpose.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "deceptive ai explanations creation and detection"):
  with members:
    - "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"
    - "how do i fool you manipulating user trust via misleading black box explanations"
    - "how to manipulate cnns to make them lie the gradcam case"
    - "generating sentiment preserving fake online reviews using neural language models and their human and machine based detection"
    - "how model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trust"
    - "perturbation sensitivity analysis to detect unintended model biases"
    - "rise randomized input sampling for explanation of black box models"
    - "sanity checks for saliency maps"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a multidisciplinary survey and framework for design and evaluation of explainable ai systems"):
  with members:
    - "fairsight visual analytics for fairness in decision making"
    - "predicting model failure using saliency maps in autonomous driving systems"
    - "quantifying interpretability and trust in machine learning systems"
    - "summit scaling deep learning interpretability by visualizing activation and attribution summarizations"
    - "explainable artificial intelligence xai concepts taxonomies opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai"
    - "open issues in combating fake news interpretability as an opportunity"
    - "a survey on bias and fairness in machine learning"
    - "metrics for explainable ai challenges and prospects"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)