human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "beyond linearization on quadratic and higher order approximation of wide neural networks"
  Abstract: Recent theoretical work has established connections between over-parametrized neural networks and linearized models governed by he Neural Tangent Kernels (NTKs). NTK theory leads to concrete convergence and generalization results, yet the empirical performance of neural networks are observed to exceed their linearized models, suggesting insufficiency of this theory. #R##N#Towards closing this gap, we investigate the training of over-parametrized neural networks that are beyond the NTK regime yet still governed by the Taylor expansion of the network. We bring forward the idea of \emph{randomizing} the neural networks, which allows them to escape their NTK and couple with quadratic models. We show that the optimization landscape of randomized two-layer networks are nice and amenable to escaping-saddle algorithms. We prove concrete generalization and expressivity results on these randomized networks, which leads to sample complexity bounds (of learning certain simple functions) that match the NTK and can in addition be better by a dimension factor when mild distributional assumptions are present. We demonstrate that our randomization technique can be generalized systematically beyond the quadratic case, by using it to find networks that are coupled with higher-order terms in their Taylor series.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "mean field analysis of two layer neural networks non asymptotic rates and generalization bounds"):
  with members:
    - "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning"
    - "how much over parameterization is sufficient to learn deep relu networks"
    - "towards understanding the spectral bias of deep learning"
    - "an improved analysis of training over parameterized deep neural networks"
    - "generalization error bounds of gradient descent for learning over parameterized deep relu networks"
    - "towards moderate overparameterization global convergence guarantees for training shallow neural networks"
    - "over parameterized two level neural networks can learn near optimal feature representations"
    - "convex formulation of overparameterized deep neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "taylorized training towards better approximation of neural network training at finite width"):
  with members:
    - "simple and effective regularization methods for training on noisily labeled data with generalization guarantee"
    - "tensor programs i wide feedforward or recurrent neural networks of any architecture are gaussian processes"
    - "harnessing the power of infinitely wide deep nets on small data tasks"
    - "enhanced convolutional neural tangent kernels"
    - "towards explaining the regularization effect of initial large learning rate in training neural networks"
    - "on exact computation with an infinitely wide neural net"
    - "fine grained analysis of optimization and generalization for overparameterized two layer neural networks"
    - "on the power and limitations of random features for understanding neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "how much over parameterization is sufficient to learn deep relu networks"):
  with members:
    - "two models of double descent for weak features"
    - "an improved analysis of training over parameterized deep neural networks"
    - "generalization error bounds of gradient descent for learning over parameterized deep relu networks"
    - "towards moderate overparameterization global convergence guarantees for training shallow neural networks"
    - "over parameterized two level neural networks can learn near optimal feature representations"
    - "convex formulation of overparameterized deep neural networks"
    - "polylogarithmic width suffices for gradient descent to achieve arbitrarily small test error with shallow relu networks"
    - "gradient descent maximizes the margin of homogeneous neural networks"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)