human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "entity centric contextual affective analysis"
  Abstract: While contextualized word representations have improved state-of-the-art benchmarks in many NLP tasks, their potential usefulness for social-oriented tasks remains largely unexplored. We show how contextualized word embeddings can be used to capture affect dimensions in portrayals of people. We evaluate our methodology quantitatively, on held-out affect lexicons, and qualitatively, through case examples. We find that contextualized word representations do encode meaningful affect information, but they are heavily biased towards their training data, which limits their usefulness to in-domain analyses. We ultimately use our method to examine differences in portrayals of men and women.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a framework for the computational linguistic analysis of dehumanization"):
  with members:
    - "social bias frames reasoning about social and power implications of language"
    - "mitigating gender bias in natural language processing literature review"
    - "talkdown a corpus for condescension detection in context"
    - "automatically neutralizing subjective bias in text"
    - "black is to criminal as caucasian is to police detecting and removing multiclass bias in word embeddings"
    - "contextual affective analysis a case study of people portrayals in online metoo stories"
    - "examining gender and race bias in two hundred sentiment analysis systems"
    - "gender bias in coreference resolution"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "measuring bias in contextualized word representations"):
  with members:
    - "on measuring social biases in sentence encoders"
    - "black is to criminal as caucasian is to police detecting and removing multiclass bias in word embeddings"
    - "evaluating the underlying gender bias in contextualized word embeddings"
    - "gender bias in contextualized word embeddings"
    - "mind the gap a balanced corpus of gendered ambiguous pronouns"
    - "gender bias in coreference resolution"
    - "feature wise bias amplification"
    - "deep contextualized word representations"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)