human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "learning based application agnostic 3d noc design for heterogeneous manycore systems"
  Abstract: The rising use of deep learning and other big-data algorithms has led to an increasing demand for hardware platforms that are computationally powerful, yet energy-efficient. Due to the amount of data parallelism in these algorithms, high-performance three-dimensional (3D) manycore platforms that incorporate both CPUs and GPUs present a promising direction. However, as systems use heterogeneity (e.g., a combination of CPUs, GPUs, and accelerators) to improve performance and efficiency, it becomes more pertinent to address the distinct and likely conflicting communication requirements (e.g., CPU memory access latency or GPU network throughput) that arise from such heterogeneity. Unfortunately, it is difficult to quickly explore the hardware design space and choose appropriate tradeoffs between these heterogeneous requirements. To address these challenges, we propose the design of a 3D Network-on-Chip (NoC) for heterogeneous manycore platforms that considers the appropriate design objectives for a 3D heterogeneous system and explores various tradeoffs using an efficient machine learning (ML)-based multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique. The proposed design space exploration considers the various requirements of its heterogeneous components and generates a set of 3D NoC architectures that efficiently trades off these design objectives. Our findings show that by jointly considering these requirements (latency, throughput, temperature, and energy), we can achieve 9.6 percent better Energy-Delay Product on average at nearly iso-temperature conditions when compared to a thermally-optimized design for 3D heterogeneous NoCs. More importantly, our results suggest that our 3D NoCs optimized for a few applications can be generalized for unknown applications as well. Our results show that these generalized 3D NoCs only incur a 1.8 percent (36-tile system) and 1.1 percent (64-tile system) average performance loss compared to application-specific NoCs.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a survey of machine learning applied to computer architecture design"):
  with members:
    - "a static analysis based cross architecture performance prediction using machine learning"
    - "optimizing routerless network on chip designs an innovative learning based framework"
    - "learning multi agent communication under limited bandwidth restriction for internet packet routing"
    - "improving branch prediction by modeling global history with convolutional neural networks"
    - "scalable training of artificial neural networks with adaptive sparse connectivity inspired by network science"
    - "the case for learned index structures"
    - "feature selection a data perspective"
    - "efficient processing of deep neural networks a tutorial and survey"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)