human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "a new analysis of differential privacy s generalization guarantees"
  Abstract: We give a new proof of the "transfer theorem" underlying adaptive data analysis: that any mechanism for answering adaptively chosen statistical queries that is differentially private and sample-accurate is also accurate out-of-sample. Our new proof is elementary and gives structural insights that we expect will be useful elsewhere. We show: 1) that differential privacy ensures that the expectation of any query on the posterior distribution on datasets induced by the transcript of the interaction is close to its true value on the data distribution, and 2) sample accuracy on its own ensures that any query answer produced by the mechanism is close to its posterior expectation with high probability. This second claim follows from a thought experiment in which we imagine that the dataset is resampled from the posterior distribution after the mechanism has committed to its answers. The transfer theorem then follows by summing these two bounds, and in particular, avoids the "monitor argument" used to derive high probability bounds in prior work. An upshot of our new proof technique is that the concrete bounds we obtain are substantially better than the best previously known bounds, even though the improvements are in the constants, rather than the asymptotics (which are known to be tight). As we show, our new bounds outperform the naive "sample-splitting" baseline at dramatically smaller dataset sizes compared to the previous state of the art, bringing techniques from this literature closer to practicality.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information"):
  with members:
    - "robust generalization via α mutual information"
    - "in defense of uniform convergence generalization via derandomization with an application to interpolating predictors"
    - "strengthened information theoretic bounds on the generalization error"
    - "tightening mutual information based bounds on generalization error"
    - "high probability generalization bounds for uniformly stable algorithms with nearly optimal rate"
    - "pac learning with stable and private predictions"
    - "a direct sum result for the information complexity of learning"
    - "chaining mutual information and tightening generalization bounds"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "closure properties for private classification and online prediction"):
  with members:
    - "privately learning thresholds closing the exponential gap"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "private learning implies online learning an efficient reduction"
    - "private pac learning implies finite littlestone dimension"
    - "generalization for adaptively chosen estimators via stable median"
    - "online learning via differential privacy"
    - "differentially private release and learning of threshold functions"
    - "algorithmic stability for adaptive data analysis"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "efficient noise tolerant and private learning via boosting"):
  with members:
    - "concentrated differential privacy simplifications extensions and lower bounds"
    - "algorithmic stability for adaptive data analysis"
    - "privately solving linear programs"
    - "differential privacy for the analyst via private equilibrium computation"
    - "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis"
    - "what can we learn privately"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "guaranteed validity for empirical approaches to adaptive data analysis"):
  with members:
    - "natural analysts in adaptive data analysis"
    - "model similarity mitigates test set overuse"
    - "generalization for adaptively chosen estimators via stable median"
    - "information theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithms"
    - "calibrating noise to variance in adaptive data analysis"
    - "concentrated differential privacy simplifications extensions and lower bounds"
    - "max information differential privacy and post selection hypothesis testing"
    - "generalization in adaptive data analysis and holdout reuse"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)