human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "smart jammer and lte network strategies in an infinite horizon zero sum repeated game with asymmetric and incomplete information"
  Abstract: LTE/LTE-Advanced networks are known to be vulnerable to denial-of-service and loss-of-service attacks from smart jammers. In this article, the interaction between a smart jammer and LTE network is modeled as an infinite-horizon, zero-sum, asymmetric repeated game. The smart jammer and eNode B are modeled as the informed and the uninformed player, respectively. The main purpose of this article is to construct efficient suboptimal strategies for both players that can be used to solve the above-mentioned infinite-horizon repeated game with asymmetric and incomplete information. It has been shown in game-theoretic literature that security strategies provide optimal solution in zero-sum games. It is also shown that both players' security strategies in an infinite-horizon asymmetric game depend only on the history of the informed player's actions. However, fixed-sized sufficient statistics are needed for both players to solve the above-mentioned game efficiently. The smart jammer uses its evolving belief state as the fixed-sized sufficient statistics for the repeated game. Whereas, the LTE network (uninformed player) uses worst-case regret of its security strategy and its anti-discounted update as the fixed-sized sufficient statistics. Although fixed-sized sufficient statistics are employed by both players, optimal security strategy computation in {\lambda}-discounted asymmetric games is still hard to perform because of non-convexity. Hence, the problem is convexified in this article by devising `approximated' security strategies for both players that are based on approximated optimal game value. However, `approximated' strategies require full monitoring. Therefore, a simplistic yet effective `expected' strategy is also constructed for the LTE network that does not require full monitoring. The simulation results show that the smart jammer plays non-revealing and misleading strategies.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)