human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"
  Abstract: This work studies differential privacy in the context of the recently proposed shuffle model. Unlike in the local model, where the server collecting privatized data from users can track back an input to a specific user, in the shuffle model users submit their privatized inputs to a server anonymously. This setup yields a trust model which sits in between the classical curator and local models for differential privacy. The shuffle model is the core idea in the Encode, Shuffle, Analyze (ESA) model introduced by Bittau et al. (SOPS 2017). Recent work by Cheu et al. (EUROCRYPT 2019) analyzes the differential privacy properties of the shuffle model and shows that in some cases shuffled protocols provide strictly better accuracy than local protocols. Additionally, Erlingsson et al. (SODA 2019) provide a privacy amplification bound quantifying the level of curator differential privacy achieved by the shuffle model in terms of the local differential privacy of the randomizer used by each user. In this context, we make three contributions. First, we provide an optimal single message protocol for summation of real numbers in the shuffle model. Our protocol is very simple and has better accuracy and communication than the protocols for this same problem proposed by Cheu et al. Optimality of this protocol follows from our second contribution, a new lower bound for the accuracy of private protocols for summation of real numbers in the shuffle model. The third contribution is a new amplification bound for analyzing the privacy of protocols in the shuffle model in terms of the privacy provided by the corresponding local randomizer. Our amplification bound generalizes the results by Erlingsson et al. to a wider range of parameters, and provides a whole family of methods to analyze privacy amplification in the shuffle model.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages"):
  with members:
    - "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"
    - "improved summation from shuffling"
    - "separating local shuffled differential privacy via histograms"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "private aggregation from fewer anonymous messages"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "federated learning strategies for improving communication efficiency"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "encode shuffle analyze privacy revisited formalizations and empirical evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "private heavy hitters and range queries in the shuffled model"
    - "that which we call private"
    - "private stochastic convex optimization with optimal rates"
    - "evaluating differentially private machine learning in practice"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "privacy amplification by subsampling tight analyses via couplings and divergences"
    - "distributed differential privacy via shuffling"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "private summation in the multi message shuffle model"):
  with members:
    - "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"
    - "private aggregation from fewer anonymous messages"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "manipulation attacks in local differential privacy"
    - "distributed differential privacy via shuffling"
    - "prochlo strong privacy for analytics in the crowd"
    - "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis"
    - "what can we learn privately"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "differential privacy with partial knowledge"):
  with members:
    - "renyi differential privacy"
    - "differential privacy as a causal property"
    - "towards extending noiseless privacy dependent data and more practical approach"

Connected through hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on the power of multiple anonymous messages"):
  with members:
    - "improved summation from shuffling"
    - "separating local shuffled differential privacy via histograms"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "practical and robust privacy amplification with multi party differential privacy"
    - "communication complexity in locally private distribution estimation and heavy hitters"
    - "private aggregation from fewer anonymous messages"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"

Connected through hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the power of synergy in differential privacy combining a small curator with local randomizers"):
  with members:
    - "locally private k means clustering"
    - "blender enabling local search with a hybrid differential privacy model"
    - "differentially private summation with multi message shuffling"
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy through communication complexity"
    - "scalable and differentially private distributed aggregation in the shuffled model"
    - "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "tight lower bounds for locally differentially private selection"

Connected through hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy"):
  with members:
    - "exponential separations in local differential privacy"
    - "learning without interaction requires separation"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "towards instance optimal private query release"
    - "test without trust optimal locally private distribution testing"
    - "locally private gaussian estimation"
    - "tight lower bounds for locally differentially private selection"
    - "inference under information constraints i lower bounds from chi square contraction"

Connected through hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "linear and range counting under metric based local differential privacy"):
  with members:
    - "secure and utility aware data collection with condensed local differential privacy"
    - "consistent and accurate frequency oracles under local differential privacy"
    - "capacity bounded differential privacy"
    - "hadamard response estimating distributions privately efficiently and with little communication"
    - "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity"
    - "distributed differential privacy via shuffling"
    - "utility optimized local differential privacy mechanisms for distribution estimation"
    - "practical locally private heavy hitters"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)