human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "feature graph learning for 3d point cloud denoising"
  Abstract: Identifying an appropriate underlying graph kernel that reflects pairwise similarities is critical in many recent graph spectral signal restoration schemes, including image denoising, dequantization, and contrast enhancement. Existing graph learning algorithms compute the most likely entries of a properly defined graph Laplacian matrix $\mathbf{L}$, but require a large number of signal observations $\mathbf{z}$'s for a stable estimate. In this work, we assume instead the availability of a relevant feature vector $\mathbf{f}_i$ per node $i$, from which we compute an optimal feature graph via optimization of a feature metric. Specifically, we alternately optimize the diagonal and off-diagonal entries of a Mahalanobis distance matrix $\mathbf{M}$ by minimizing the graph Laplacian regularizer (GLR) $\mathbf{z}^{\top} \mathbf{L} \mathbf{z}$, where edge weight is $w_{i,j} = \exp\{-(\mathbf{f}_i - \mathbf{f}_j)^{\top} \mathbf{M} (\mathbf{f}_i - \mathbf{f}_j) \}$, given a single observation $\mathbf{z}$. We optimize diagonal entries via proximal gradient (PG), where we constrain $\mathbf{M}$ to be positive definite (PD) via linear inequalities derived from the Gershgorin circle theorem. To optimize off-diagonal entries, we design a block descent algorithm that iteratively optimizes one row and column of $\mathbf{M}$. To keep $\mathbf{M}$ PD, we constrain the Schur complement of sub-matrix $\mathbf{M}_{2,2}$ of $\mathbf{M}$ to be PD when optimizing via PG. Our algorithm mitigates full eigen-decomposition of $\mathbf{M}$, thus ensuring fast computation speed even when feature vector $\mathbf{f}_i$ has high dimension. To validate its usefulness, we apply our feature graph learning algorithm to the problem of 3D point cloud denoising, resulting in state-of-the-art performance compared to competing schemes in extensive experiments.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fast graph metric learning via gershgorin disc alignment"):
  with members:
    - "graph based blind image deblurring from a single photograph"
    - "graph laplacian regularization for image denoising analysis in the continuous domain"
    - "random walk graph laplacian based smoothness prior for soft decoding of jpeg images"
    - "the emerging field of signal processing on graphs extending high dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)