human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "continuous relaxations for the traveling salesman problem"
  Abstract: In this work, we aim to explore connections between dynamical systems techniques and combinatorial optimization problems. In particular, we construct heuristic approaches for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) based on embedding the relaxed discrete optimization problem into appropriate manifolds. We explore multiple embedding techniques—namely the construction of new dynamical systems on the manifold of orthogonal matrices and associated Procrustes approximations of the TSP cost function. Using these dynamical systems, we analyze the local neighborhood around the optimal TSP solutions (which are equilibria) using computations to approximate the associated stable manifolds. We find that these flows frequently converge to undesirable equilibria. However, the solutions of the dynamical systems and the associated Procrustes approximation provide an interesting biasing approach for the popular Lin–Kernighan heuristic which yields fast convergence. The Lin–Kernighan heuristic is typically based on the computation of edges that have a “high probability” of being in the shortest tour, thereby effectively pruning the search space. Our new approach, instead, relies on a natural relaxation of the combinatorial optimization problem to the manifold of orthogonal matrices and the subsequent use of this solution to bias the Lin–Kernighan heuristic. Although the initial cost of computing these edges using the Procrustes solution is higher than existing methods, we find that the Procrustes solution, when coupled with a homotopy computation, contains valuable information regarding the optimal edges. We explore the Procrustes-based approach on several TSP instances and find that our approach on average requires fewer k-opt moves than existing approaches. Broadly, this work connects dynamical systems theory with combinatorial optimization to provide algorithmic and computational complexity insights.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)