human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the compositionality of neural networks integrating symbolism and connectionism"
  Abstract: Despite a multitude of empirical studies, little consensus exists on whether neural networks are able to generalise compositionally, a controversy that, in part, stems from a lack of agreement about what it means for a neural model to be compositional. As a response to this controversy, we present a set of tests that provide a bridge between, on the one hand, the vast amount of linguistic and philosophical theory about compositionality and, on the other, the successful neural models of language. We collect different interpretations of compositionality and translate them into five theoretically grounded tests that are formulated on a task-independent level. In particular, we provide tests to investigate (i) if models systematically recombine known parts and rules (ii) if models can extend their predictions beyond the length they have seen in the training data (iii) if models' composition operations are local or global (iv) if models' predictions are robust to synonym substitutions and (v) if models favour rules or exceptions during training. To demonstrate the usefulness of this evaluation paradigm, we instantiate these five tests on a highly compositional data set which we dub PCFG SET and apply the resulting tests to three popular sequence-to-sequence models: a recurrent, a convolution based and a transformer model. We provide an in depth analysis of the results, that uncover the strengths and weaknesses of these three architectures and point to potential areas of improvement.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "discovering the compositional structure of vector representations with role learning networks"):
  with members:
    - "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference"
    - "correlating neural and symbolic representations of language"
    - "measuring compositionality in representation learning"
    - "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations"
    - "analyzing machine learned representations a natural language case study"
    - "blackbox meets blackbox representational similarity and stability analysis of neural language models and brains"
    - "collecting diverse natural language inference problems for sentence representation evaluation"
    - "glue a multi task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "capacity bandwidth and compositionality in emergent language learning"):
  with members:
    - "linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networks"
    - "on the interaction between supervision and self play in emergent communication"
    - "anti efficient encoding in emergent communication"
    - "word order biases in deep agent emergent communication"
    - "measuring compositionality in representation learning"
    - "countering language drift via visual grounding"
    - "compositional generalization through meta sequence to sequence learning"
    - "pytorch an imperative style high performance deep learning library"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on compositionality in neural machine translation"):
  with members:
    - "jump to better conclusions scan both left and right"
    - "still not systematic after all these years on the compositional skills of sequence to sequence recurrent networks"
    - "attention is all you need"
    - "neural machine translation and sequence to sequence models a tutorial"
    - "generalization without systematicity on the compositional skills of sequence to sequence recurrent networks"
    - "effective approaches to attention based neural machine translation"
    - "sequence to sequence video to text"
    - "a neural conversational model"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)