human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "characterizing eosio blockchain"
  Abstract: EOSIO has become one of the most popular blockchain platforms since its mainnet launch in June 2018. In contrast to the traditional PoW-based systems (e.g., Bitcoin and Ethereum), which are limited by low throughput, EOSIO is the first high throughput Delegated Proof of Stake system that has been widely adopted by many applications. Although EOSIO has millions of accounts and billions of transactions, little is known about its ecosystem, especially related to security and fraud. In this paper, we perform a large-scale measurement study of the EOSIO blockchain and its associated DApps. We gather a large-scale dataset of EOSIO and characterize activities including money transfers, account creation and contract invocation. Using our insights, we then develop techniques to automatically detect bots and fraudulent activity. We discover thousands of bot accounts (over 30\% of the accounts in the platform) and a number of real-world attacks (301 attack accounts). By the time of our study, 80 attack accounts we identified have been confirmed by DApp teams, causing 828,824 EOS tokens losses (roughly 2.6 million US\$) in total.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "security analysis of eosio smart contracts"):
  with members:
    - "easyflow keep ethereum away from overflow"
    - "memory safety preservation for webassembly"
    - "characterizing code clones in the ethereum smart contract ecosystem"
    - "a security case study for blockchain games"
    - "contractfuzzer fuzzing smart contracts for vulnerability detection"
    - "taintassembly taint based information flow control tracking for webassembly"
    - "wasabi a framework for dynamically analyzing webassembly"
    - "taint tracking for webassembly"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "characterizing cryptocurrency exchange scams"):
  with members:
    - "large scale analysis of pop up scam on typosquatting urls"
    - "a large scale empirical study on industrial fake apps"
    - "beyond google play a large scale comparative study of chinese android app markets"
    - "data mining for detecting bitcoin ponzi schemes"
    - "rebooting research on detecting repackaged android apps literature review and benchmark"
    - "dissecting ponzi schemes on ethereum identification analysis and impact"
    - "an analysis of attacks on blockchain consensus"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)