human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "module per object a human driven methodology for c based high level synthesis design"
  Abstract: High-Level Synthesis (HLS) brings FPGAs to audiences previously unfamiliar to hardware design. However, achieving the highest Quality-of-Results (QoR) with HLS is still unattainable for most programmers. This requires detailed knowledge of FPGA architecture and hardware design in order to produce FPGA-friendly codes. Moreover, these codes are normally in conflict with best coding practices, which favor code reuse, modularity, and conciseness. #R##N#To overcome these limitations, we propose Module-per-Object (MpO), a human-driven HLS design methodology intended for both hardware designers and software developers with limited FPGA expertise. MpO exploits modern C++ to raise the abstraction level while improving QoR, code readability and modularity. To guide HLS designers, we present the five characteristics of MpO classes. Each characteristic exploits the power of HLS-supported modern C++ features to build C++-based hardware modules. These characteristics lead to high-quality software descriptions and efficient hardware generation. We also present a use case of MpO, where we use C++ as the intermediate language for FPGA-targeted code generation from P4, a packet processing domain specific language. The MpO methodology is evaluated using three design experiments: a packet parser, a flow-based traffic manager, and a digital up-converter. Based on experiments, we show that MpO can be comparable to hand-written VHDL code while keeping a high abstraction level, human-readable coding style and modularity. Compared to traditional C-based HLS design, MpO leads to more efficient circuit generation, both in terms of performance and resource utilization. Also, the MpO approach notably improves software quality, augmenting parametrization while eliminating the incidence of code duplication.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "anyhls high level synthesis with partial evaluation"):
  with members:
    - "transformations of high level synthesis codes for high performance computing"
    - "automated accelerator generation and optimization with composable parallel and pipeline architecture"
    - "tiramisu a polyhedral compiler for expressing fast and portable code"
    - "programming heterogeneous systems from an image processing dsl"
    - "c templates as partial evaluation"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)