human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "scann synthesis of compact and accurate neural networks"
  Abstract: Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have become the driving force behind recent artificial intelligence (AI) research. An important problem with implementing a neural network is the design of its architecture. Typically, such an architecture is obtained manually by exploring its hyperparameter space and kept fixed during training. This approach is both time-consuming and inefficient. Furthermore, modern neural networks often contain millions of parameters, whereas many applications require small inference models. Also, while ANNs have found great success in big-data applications, there is also significant interest in using ANNs for medium- and small-data applications that can be run on energy-constrained edge devices. To address these challenges, we propose a neural network synthesis methodology (SCANN) that can generate very compact neural networks without loss in accuracy for small and medium-size datasets. We also use dimensionality reduction methods to reduce the feature size of the datasets, so as to alleviate the curse of dimensionality. Our final synthesis methodology consists of three steps: dataset dimensionality reduction, neural network compression in each layer, and neural network compression with SCANN. We evaluate SCANN on the medium-size MNIST dataset by comparing our synthesized neural networks to the well-known LeNet-5 baseline. Without any loss in accuracy, SCANN generates a $46.3\times$ smaller network than the LeNet-5 Caffe model. We also evaluate the efficiency of using dimensionality reduction alongside SCANN on nine small to medium-size datasets. Using this methodology enables us to reduce the number of connections in the network by up to $5078.7\times$ (geometric mean: $82.1\times$), with little to no drop in accuracy. We also show that our synthesis methodology yields neural networks that are much better at navigating the accuracy vs. energy efficiency space.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "steerage synthesis of neural networks using architecture search and grow and prune methods"):
  with members:
    - "incremental learning using a grow and prune paradigm with efficient neural networks"
    - "single path one shot neural architecture search with uniform sampling"
    - "switchable normalization for learning to normalize deep representation"
    - "secret semantically enhanced classification of real world tasks"
    - "netadapt platform aware neural network adaptation for mobile applications"
    - "amc automl for model compression and acceleration on mobile devices"
    - "rethinking the smaller norm less informative assumption in channel pruning of convolution layers"
    - "shufflenet v2 practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "incremental learning using a grow and prune paradigm with efficient neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "hardware guided symbiotic training for compact accurate yet execution efficient lstm"
    - "knowledge transfer in deep block modular neural networks"
    - "tree cnn a hierarchical deep convolutional neural network for incremental learning"
    - "mobilenetv2 inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks"
    - "neural voice cloning with a few samples"
    - "tree cnn a deep convolutional neural network for lifelong learning"
    - "shufflenet v2 practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design"
    - "incremental training of deep convolutional neural networks"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "diabdeep pervasive diabetes diagnosis based on wearable medical sensors and efficient neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "incremental learning using a grow and prune paradigm with efficient neural networks"
    - "shufflenet v2 practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design"
    - "deepheart semi supervised sequence learning for cardiovascular risk prediction"
    - "learning deep representations with probabilistic knowledge transfer"
    - "a microprocessor implemented in 65nm cmos with configurable and bit scalable accelerator for programmable in memory computing"
    - "verideep verifying integrity of deep neural networks through sensitive sample fingerprinting"
    - "grow and prune compact fast and accurate lstms"
    - "shift a zero flop zero parameter alternative to spatial convolutions"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)