human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "evaluating explainers via perturbation"
  Abstract: Due to high complexity of many modern machine learning models such as deep convolutional networks, understanding the cause of model's prediction is critical. Many explainers have been designed to give us more insights on the decision of complex classifiers. However, there is no common ground on evaluating the quality of different classification methods. Motivated by the needs for comprehensive evaluation, we introduce the c-Eval metric and the corresponding framework to quantify the explainer's quality on feature-based explainers of machine learning image classifiers. Given a prediction and the corresponding explanation on that prediction, c-Eval is the minimum-power perturbation that successfully alters the prediction while keeping the explanation's features unchanged. We also provide theoretical analysis linking the proposed parameter with the portion of predicted object covered by the explanation. Using a heuristic approach, we introduce the c-Eval plot, which not only displays a strong connection between c-Eval and explainers' quality, but also serves as a low-complexity approach of assessing explainers. We finally conduct extensive experiments of explainers on three different datasets in order to support the adoption of c-Eval in evaluating explainers' performance.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "survlime a method for explaining machine learning survival models"):
  with members:
    - "explaining the explainer a first theoretical analysis of lime"
    - "graphlime local interpretable model explanations for graph neural networks"
    - "one explanation does not fit all a toolkit and taxonomy of ai explainability techniques"
    - "alime autoencoder based approach for local interpretability"
    - "explainable artificial intelligence xai concepts taxonomies opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai"
    - "measurable counterfactual local explanations for any classifier"
    - "enriching visual with verbal explanations for relational concepts combining lime with aleph"
    - "dlime a deterministic local interpretable model agnostic explanations approach for computer aided diagnosis systems"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards a unified evaluation of explanation methods without ground truth"):
  with members:
    - "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization"
    - "can i trust the explainer verifying post hoc explanatory methods"
    - "bim towards quantitative evaluation of interpretability methods with ground truth"
    - "evaluating recurrent neural network explanations"
    - "evaluating explanation without ground truth in interpretable machine learning"
    - "net2vec quantifying and explaining how concepts are encoded by filters in deep neural networks"
    - "towards robust interpretability with self explaining neural networks"
    - "l shapley and c shapley efficient model interpretation for structured data"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "an explanation method for siamese neural networks"):
  with members:
    - "explaining deep neural networks with a polynomial time algorithm for shapley values approximation"
    - "alime autoencoder based approach for local interpretability"
    - "dlime a deterministic local interpretable model agnostic explanations approach for computer aided diagnosis systems"
    - "interpretable counterfactual explanations guided by prototypes"
    - "normlime a new feature importance metric for explaining deep neural networks"
    - "model agnostic contrastive explanations for structured data"
    - "a survey of evaluation methods and measures for interpretable machine learning"
    - "metric learning for novelty and anomaly detection"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)