human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on the estimation of complex circuits functional failure rate by machine learning techniques"
  Abstract: De-Rating or Vulnerability Factors are a major feature of failure analysis efforts mandated by today's Functional Safety requirements. Determining the Functional De-Rating of sequential logic cells typically requires computationally intensive fault-injection simulation campaigns. In this paper a new approach is proposed which uses Machine Learning to estimate the Functional De-Rating of individual flip-flops and thus, optimising and enhancing fault injection efforts. Therefore, first, a set of per-instance features is described and extracted through an analysis approach combining static elements (cell properties, circuit structure, synthesis attributes) and dynamic elements (signal activity). Second, reference data is obtained through first-principles fault simulation approaches. Finally, one part of the reference dataset is used to train the Machine Learning algorithm and the remaining is used to validate and benchmark the accuracy of the trained tool. The intended goal is to obtain a trained model able to provide accurate per-instance Functional De-Rating data for the full list of circuit instances, an objective that is difficult to reach using classical methods. The presented methodology is accompanied by a practical example to determine the performance of various Machine Learning models for different training sizes.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "rescue interdependent challenges of reliability security and quality in nanoelectronic systems"):
  with members:
    - "pascal timing sca resistant design and verification flow"
    - "high level combined deterministic and pseudo exhuastive test generation for risc processors"
    - "challenges of reliability assessment and enhancement in autonomous systems"
    - "accelerating transient fault injection campaigns by using dynamic hdl slicing"
    - "functional failure rate due to single event transients in clock distribution networks"
    - "towards multidimensional verification where functional meets non functional"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)