human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "on the use of emojis to train emotion classifiers"
  Abstract: Nowadays, the automatic detection of emotions is employed by many applications in different fields like security informatics, e-learning, humor detection, targeted advertising, etc. Many of these applications focus on social media and treat this problem as a classification problem, which requires preparing training data. The typical method for annotating the training data by human experts is considered time consuming, labor intensive and sometimes prone to error. Moreover, such an approach is not easily extensible to new domains/languages since such extensions require annotating new training data. In this study, we propose a distant supervised learning approach where the training sentences are automatically annotated based on the emojis they have. Such training data would be very cheap to produce compared with the manually created training data, thus, much larger training data can be easily obtained. On the other hand, this training data would naturally have lower quality as it may contain some errors in the annotation. Nonetheless, we experimentally show that training classifiers on cheap, large and possibly erroneous data annotated using this approach leads to more accurate results compared with training the same classifiers on the more expensive, much smaller and error-free manually annotated training data. Our experiments are conducted on an in-house dataset of emotional Arabic tweets and the classifiers we consider are: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multinomial Naive Bayes (MNB) and Random Forest (RF). In addition to experimenting with single classifiers, we also consider using an ensemble of classifiers. The results show that using an automatically annotated training data (that is only one order of magnitude larger than the manually annotated one) gives better results in almost all settings considered.

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)