human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "interpret federated learning with shapley values"
  Abstract: Federated Learning is introduced to protect privacy by distributing training data into multiple parties. Each party trains its own model and a meta-model is constructed from the sub models. In this way the details of the data are not disclosed in between each party. In this paper we investigate the model interpretation methods for Federated Learning, specifically on the measurement of feature importance of vertical Federated Learning where feature space of the data is divided into two parties, namely host and guest. For host party to interpret a single prediction of vertical Federated Learning model, the interpretation results, namely the feature importance, are very likely to reveal the protected data from guest party. We propose a method to balance the model interpretability and data privacy in vertical Federated Learning by using Shapley values to reveal detailed feature importance for host features and a unified importance value for federated guest features. Our experiments indicate robust and informative results for interpreting Federated Learning models.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "asynchronous federated learning with differential privacy for edge intelligence"):
  with members:
    - "differentially private learning with adaptive clipping"
    - "min entropy latent model for weakly supervised object detection"
    - "federated machine learning concept and applications"
    - "exploiting unintended feature leakage in collaborative learning"
    - "mvg mechanism differential privacy under matrix valued query"
    - "trunk branch ensemble convolutional neural networks for video based face recognition"
    - "federated learning strategies for improving communication efficiency"
    - "a general approach to adding differential privacy to iterative training procedures"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "measure contribution of participants in federated learning"):
  with members:
    - "federated machine learning concept and applications"
    - "federated learning strategies for improving communication efficiency"
    - "consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles"
    - "a unified approach to interpreting model predictions"
    - "federated learning of deep networks using model averaging"
    - "communication efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)