human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "the intrinsic robustness of stochastic bandits to strategic manipulation"
  Abstract: We study the behavior of stochastic bandits algorithms under \emph{strategic behavior} conducted by rational actors, i.e., the arms. Each arm is a strategic player who can modify its own reward whenever pulled, subject to a cross-period budget constraint. Each arm is \emph{self-interested} and seeks to maximize its own expected number of times of being pulled over a decision horizon. Strategic manipulations naturally arise in various economic applications, e.g., recommendation systems such as Yelp and Amazon. We analyze the robustness of three popular bandit algorithms: UCB, $\varepsilon$-Greedy, and Thompson Sampling. We prove that all three algorithms achieve a regret upper bound $\mathcal{O}(\max \{ B, \ln T\})$ under \emph{any} (possibly adaptive) strategy of the strategic arms, where $B$ is the total budget across arms. Moreover, we prove that our regret upper bound is \emph{tight}. Our results illustrate the intrinsic robustness of bandits algorithms against strategic manipulation so long as $B=o(T)$. This is in sharp contrast to the more pessimistic model of adversarial attacks where an attack budget of $\mathcal{O}(\ln T) $ can trick UCB and $\varepsilon$-Greedy to pull the optimal arm only $o(T)$ number of times. Our results hold for both bounded and unbounded rewards.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "action manipulation attacks against stochastic bandits attacks and defense"):
  with members:
    - "robust stochastic bandit algorithms under probabilistic unbounded adversarial attack"
    - "data poisoning attacks on stochastic bandits"
    - "stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptions"
    - "data poisoning attacks in contextual bandits"
    - "is feature selection secure against training data poisoning"
    - "adversarial attacks on neural network policies"
    - "tactics of adversarial attack on deep reinforcement learning agents"
    - "data poisoning attacks on factorization based collaborative filtering"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "corrupted multidimensional binary search learning in the presence of irrational agents"):
  with members:
    - "stochastic linear optimization with adversarial corruption"
    - "corruption robust exploration in episodic reinforcement learning"
    - "better algorithms for stochastic bandits with adversarial corruptions"
    - "semi parametric dynamic contextual pricing"
    - "manipulating a learning defender and ways to counteract"
    - "contextual search via intrinsic volumes"
    - "stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptions"
    - "tsallis inf an optimal algorithm for stochastic and adversarial bandits"

Connected through hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "incentivized exploration for multi armed bandits under reward drift"):
  with members:
    - "bayesian exploration with heterogeneous agents"
    - "multi armed bandits with compensation"
    - "stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptions"
    - "incentivizing exploration with unbiased histories"
    - "learning user preferences to incentivize exploration in the sharing economy"
    - "incentivizing exploration with heterogeneous value of money"
    - "taming the monster a fast and simple algorithm for contextual bandits"
    - "further optimal regret bounds for thompson sampling"

Connected through hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "incentive aware contextual pricing with non parametric market noise"):
  with members:
    - "dynamic incentive aware learning robust pricing in contextual auctions"
    - "lp based approximation for personalized reserve prices"
    - "semi parametric dynamic contextual pricing"
    - "nonparametric learning and optimization with covariates"
    - "learning optimal reserve price against non myopic bidders"
    - "contextual search via intrinsic volumes"
    - "ironing in the dark"
    - "a nearly linear time ptas for explicit fractional packing and covering linear programs"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)