human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "maximizing drift is not optimal for solving onemax"
  Abstract: It seems very intuitive that for the maximization of the OneMax problem $f(x):=\sum_{i=1}^n{x_i}$ the best that an elitist unary unbiased search algorithm can do is to store a best so far solution, and to modify it with the operator that yields the best possible expected progress in function value. This assumption has been implicitly used in several empirical works. In [Doerr, Doerr, Yang: GECCO 2016] it was formally proven that this approach is indeed almost optimal. #R##N#In this work we prove that drift maximization is \emph{not} optimal. More precisely, we show that for most fitness levels $n/2 0}$. #R##N#As a result of independent interest we show that the optimal mutation strengths, unlike the drift-maximizing ones, can be even.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "interpolating local and global search by controlling the variance of standard bit mutation"):
  with members:
    - "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"
    - "fast artificial immune systems"
    - "better runtime guarantees via stochastic domination"
    - "towards a theory guided benchmarking suite for discrete black box optimization heuristics profiling 1 λ ea variants on onemax and leadingones"
    - "a general dichotomy of evolutionary algorithms on monotone functions"
    - "on the effectiveness of simple success based parameter selection mechanisms for two classical discrete black box optimization benchmark problems"
    - "iohprofiler a benchmarking and profiling tool for iterative optimization heuristics"
    - "fast genetic algorithms"

Connected through hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "optimal parameter choices via precise black box analysis"):
  with members:
    - "probabilistic tools for the analysis of randomized optimization heuristics"
    - "better runtime guarantees via stochastic domination"
    - "precise runtime analysis for plateaus"
    - "complexity theory for discrete black box optimization heuristics"
    - "a general dichotomy of evolutionary algorithms on monotone functions"
    - "fast genetic algorithms"
    - "the 1 λ evolutionary algorithm with self adjusting mutation rate"
    - "ranking based black box complexity"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)