human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "controlling assistive robots with learned latent actions"
  Abstract: Assistive robots enable users with disabilities to perform everyday tasks without relying on a caregiver. Unfortunately, the very dexterity that makes these arms useful also makes them challenging to control: the robot has more degrees-of-freedom (DoFs) than the human can directly coordinate with a handheld joystick. Our insight is that we can make assistive robots easier for humans to control by learning latent actions. Latent actions provide a low-DoF embedding of high-DoF robot behavior: for example, one latent dimension might guide the robot arm along a pouring motion. Because these latent actions are low-dimensional, they can be controlled by the human end-user to fluidly teleoperate the robot. In this paper, we design a teleoperation algorithm for assistive robots that learns intuitive latent dimensions from task demonstrations. We formulate the controllability, consistency, and scaling properties that intuitive latent actions should have, and evaluate how different low-dimensional embeddings capture these properties. Finally, we conduct two user studies on a robotic arm to compare our latent action approach to state-of-the-art shared autonomy baselines and direct end-effector teleoperation. Participants completed the assistive feeding and cooking tasks more quickly and efficiently when leveraging our latent actions, and also reported that latent actions made the task easier to perform. The video accompanying this paper can be found at: this https URL.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "when humans aren t optimal robots that collaborate with risk aware humans"):
  with members:
    - "asking easy questions a user friendly approach to active reward learning"
    - "better than demonstrator imitation learning via automatically ranked demonstrations"
    - "enabling robots to infer how end users teach and learn through human robot interaction"
    - "ranking based reward extrapolation without rankings"
    - "learning reward functions by integrating human demonstrations and preferences"
    - "guided cost learning deep inverse optimal control via policy optimization"
    - "decision theory with resource bounded agents"
    - "capir collaborative action planning with intention recognition"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.RO(Robotics)