human: Given a node-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where nodes represent papers and hyperedges represent sets of papers co-cited by a source paper.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center node: "truncating the y axis threat or menace"
  Abstract: Bar charts with y-axes that don't begin at zero can visually exaggerate effect sizes, and in turn lead to unjustified or erroneous judgments. However, advice for whether or not to truncate the y-axis can be equivocal for other visualization types, and there is little existing empirical work on how axis truncation impacts judgments. In this paper we present examples of visualizations where this y-axis truncation can be beneficial as well as harmful, depending on the communicative and analytical intent. We also present the results of a series of crowd-sourced experiments in which we examine how y-axis truncation impacts subjective effect size across visualization types, and we explore alternative designs that more directly alert viewers to this truncation. We find that the subjective impact of axis truncation is persistent across visualizations designs, even for viewers that are aware of the presence of truncated axes. We therefore advise against ironclad rules about when y-axes are appropriate, but ask designers to consider the scale of the meaningful effect sizes and variation they intend to communicate, regardless of the visual encoding.

Connected through hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "surfacing visualization mirages"):
  with members:
    - "ethical dimensions of visualization research"
    - "illusion of causality in visualized data"
    - "sociotechnical considerations for accessible visualization design"
    - "discriminability tests for visualization effectiveness and scalability"
    - "visual cues in estimation of part to whole comparison"
    - "excelint automatically finding spreadsheetformula errors"
    - "bias in olap queries detection explanation and removal"
    - "predicting financial crime augmenting the predictive policing arsenal"

Question: Please tell me which class the center node belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction)