human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the computational complexity of training relu s"):
  Abstract: We consider the computational complexity of training depth-2 neural networks composed of rectified linear units (ReLUs). We show that, even for the case of a single ReLU, finding a set of weights that minimizes the squared error (even approximately) for a given training set is NP-hard. We also show that for a simple network consisting of two ReLUs, the error minimization problem is NP-hard, even in the realizable case. We complement these hardness results by showing that, when the weights and samples belong to the unit ball, one can (agnostically) properly and reliably learn depth-2 ReLUs with $k$ units and error at most $\epsilon$ in time $2^{(k/\epsilon)^{O(1)}}n^{O(1)}$; this extends upon a previous work of Goel, Kanade, Klivans and Thaler (2017) which provided efficient improper learning algorithms for ReLUs.

Includes members:
  Member "complexity of training relu neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "proving the lottery ticket hypothesis pruning is all you need")
  Member "reliably learning the relu in polynomial time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning a single neuron with gradient methods")
  Member "polynomially low error pcps with polyloglog n queries via modular composition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "nearly tight bounds for robust proper learning of halfspaces with a margin")
  Member "breaking the curse of dimensionality with convex neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "good subnetworks provably exist pruning via greedy forward selection")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)