human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a recurrent convolutional neural network approach for sensorless force estimation in robotic surgery"):
  Abstract: Providing force feedback as relevant information in current Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery systems constitutes a technological challenge due to the constraints imposed by the surgical environment. In this context, Sensorless Force Estimation techniques represent a potential solution, enabling to sense the interaction forces between the surgical instruments and soft-tissues. Specifically, if visual feedback is available for observing soft-tissues' deformation, this feedback can be used to estimate the forces applied to these tissues. To this end, a force estimation model, based on Convolutional Neural Networks and Long-Short Term Memory networks, is proposed in this work. This model is designed to process both, the spatiotemporal information present in video sequences and the temporal structure of tool data (the surgical tool-tip trajectory and its grasping status). A series of analyses are carried out to reveal the advantages of the proposal and the challenges that remain for real applications. This research work focuses on two surgical task scenarios, referred to as pushing and pulling tissue. For these two scenarios, different input data modalities and their effect on the force estimation quality are investigated. These input data modalities are tool data, video sequences and a combination of both. The results suggest that the force estimation quality is better when both, the tool data and video sequences, are processed by the neural network model. Moreover, this study reveals the need for a loss function, designed to promote the modeling of smooth and sharp details found in force signals. Finally, the results show that the modeling of forces due to pulling tasks is more challenging than for the simplest pushing actions.

Includes members:
  Member "deep neural networks for no reference and full reference image quality assessment":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "active fine tuning from gmad examples improves blind image quality assessment")
  Member "methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sam the sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters")
  Member "lstm a search space odyssey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "refined gate a simple and effective gating mechanism for recurrent units")
  Member "attention clusters purely attention based local feature integration for video classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "dynamic inference a new approach toward efficient video action recognition")
  Member "unsupervised learning for physical interaction through video prediction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "transformation based adversarial video prediction on large scale data")
  Member "unsupervised monocular depth estimation with left right consistency":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "learning representations by predicting bags of visual words")
  Member "recurrent convolutional neural network regression for continuous pain intensity estimation in video":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "emopain challenge 2020 multimodal pain evaluation from facial and bodily expressions")
  Member "image to image translation with conditional adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)