human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a framework towards domain specific video summarization"):
  Abstract: In the light of exponentially increasing video content, video summarization has attracted a lot of attention recently due to its ability to optimize time and storage. Characteristics of a good summary of a video depend on the particular domain under question. We propose a novel framework for domain specific video summarization. Given a video of a particular domain, our system can produce a summary based on what is important for that domain in addition to possessing other desired characteristics like representativeness, coverage, diversity etc. as suitable to that domain. Past related work has focused either on using supervised approaches for ranking the snippets to produce summary or on using unsupervised approaches of generating the summary as a subset of snippets with the above characteristics. We look at the joint problem of learning domain specific importance of segments as well as the desired summary characteristic for that domain. Our studies show that the more efficient way of incorporating domain specific relevances into a summary is by obtaining ratings of shots as opposed to binary inclusion/exclusion information. We also argue that ratings can be seen as unified representation of all possible ground truth summaries of a video, taking us one step closer in dealing with challenges associated with multiple ground truth summaries of a video. We also propose a novel evaluation measure which is more naturally suited in assessing the quality of video summary for the task at hand than F1 like measures. It leverages the ratings information and is richer in appropriately modeling desirable and undesirable characteristics of a summary. Lastly, we release a gold standard dataset for furthering research in domain specific video summarization, which to our knowledge is the first dataset with long videos across several domains with rating annotations.

Includes members:
  Member "query focused video summarization dataset evaluation and a memory network based approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "convolutional hierarchical attention network for query focused video summarization")
  Member "a unified multi faceted video summarization system":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "deployment of customized deep learning based video analytics on surveillance cameras")
  Member "summary transfer exemplar based subset selection for video summarization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "video storytelling textual summaries for events")
  Member "video summarization with long short term memory":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "video storytelling textual summaries for events")
  Member "query focused extractive video summarization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "convolutional hierarchical attention network for query focused video summarization")
  Member "unsupervised extraction of video highlights via robust recurrent auto encoders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "summarynet a multi stage deep learning model for automatic video summarisation")
  Member "going deeper with convolutions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "very deep convolutional networks for large scale image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)