human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "inline detection of domain generation algorithms with context sensitive word embeddings"):
  Abstract: Domain generation algorithms (DGAs) are frequently employed by malware to generate domains used for connecting to command-and-control (C2) servers. Recent work in DGA detection leveraged deep learning architectures like convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and character-level long short-term memory networks (LSTMs) to classify domains. However, these classifiers perform poorly with wordlist-based DGA families, which generate domains by pseudorandomly concatenating dictionary words. We propose a novel approach that combines context-sensitive word embeddings with a simple fully-connected classifier to perform classification of domains based on word-level information. The word embeddings were pre-trained on a large unrelated corpus and left frozen during the training on domain data. The resulting small number of trainable parameters enabled extremely short training durations, while the transfer of language knowledge stored in the representations allowed for high-performing models with small training datasets. We show that this architecture reliably outperformed existing techniques on wordlist-based DGA families with just 30 DGA training examples and achieved state-of-the-art performance with around 100 DGA training examples, all while requiring an order of magnitude less time to train compared to current techniques. Of special note is the technique’s performance on the matsnu DGA: the classifier attained a 89.5% detection rate with a 1:1,000 false positive rate (FPR) after training on only 30 examples of the DGA domains, and a 91.2% detection rate with a 1:10,000 FPR after 90 examples. Considering that some of these DGAs have wordlists of several hundred words, our results demonstrate that this technique does not rely on the classifier learning the DGA wordlists. Instead, the classifier is able to learn the semantic signatures of the wordlist-based DGA families.

Includes members:
  Member "detecting dga domains with recurrent neural networks and side information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "inline detection of dga domains using side information")
  Member "deep contextualized word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "a survey on malicious domains detection through dns data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "encrypted and covert dns queries for botnets challenges and countermeasures")
  Member "universal language model fine tuning for text classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "description based text classification with reinforcement learning")
  Member "learned in translation contextualized word vectors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "automatic detection of malware generated domains with recurrent neural models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "charbot a simple and effective method for evading dga classifiers")
  Member "predicting domain generation algorithms with long short term memory networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "nested multiple instance learning in modelling of http network traffic")
  Member "one billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)