human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the trade off between privacy and fidelity via ehrhart theory"):
  Abstract: As an increasing amount of data is gathered nowadays and stored in databases (DBs), the question arises of how to protect the privacy of individual records in a DB even while providing accurate answers to queries on the DB. Differential Privacy (DP) has gained acceptance as a framework to quantify vulnerability of algorithms to privacy breaches. We consider the problem of how to sanitize an entire DB via a DP mechanism, on which unlimited further querying is performed. While protecting privacy, it is important that the sanitized DB still provide accurate responses to queries. The central contribution of this work is to characterize the amount of information preserved in an optimal DP DB sanitizing mechanism (DSM). We precisely characterize the utility-privacy trade-off of mechanisms that sanitize DBs in the asymptotic regime of large DBs. We study this in an information-theoretic framework by modeling a generic distribution on the data, and a measure of fidelity between the histograms of the original and sanitized DBs. We consider the popular $\mathbb{L}_{1}-$distortion metric that leads to the formulation as a linear program (LP). This optimization problem is prohibitive in complexity with the number of constraints growing exponentially in the parameters of the problem. Leveraging tools from discrete geometry, analytic combinatorics, and duality theorems of optimization, we fully characterize the optimal solution in terms of a power series whose coefficients are the number of integer points on a multidimensional convex polytope studied by Ehrhart in 1967. Employing Ehrhart theory, we determine a simple closed form computable expression for the asymptotic growth of the optimal privacy-fidelity trade-off to infinite precision. At the heart of the findings is a deep connection between the minimum expected distortion and the Ehrhart series of an integral convex polytope.

Includes members:
  Member "on the relation between identifiability differential privacy and mutual information privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "local information privacy and its application to privacy preserving data aggregation")
  Member "optimal noise adding mechanisms for approximate differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reviewing and improving the gaussian mechanism for differential privacy")
  Member "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "impossibility of differentially private universally optimal mechanisms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "on the geometry of differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "privately learning markov random fields")
  Member "universally utility maximizing privacy mechanisms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "guidelines for implementing and auditing differentially private systems")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)