human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "object detection from scratch with deep supervision"):
  Abstract: We propose Deeply Supervised Object Detectors (DSOD), an object detection framework that can be trained from scratch. Recent advances in object detection heavily depend on the off-the-shelf models pre-trained on large-scale classification datasets like ImageNet and OpenImage. However, one problem is that adopting pre-trained models from classification to detection task may incur learning bias due to the different objective function and diverse distributions of object categories. Techniques like fine-tuning on detection task could alleviate this issue to some extent but are still not fundamental. Furthermore, transferring these pre-trained models across discrepant domains will be more difficult (e.g., from RGB to depth images). Thus, a better solution to handle these critical problems is to train object detectors from scratch, which motivates our proposed method. Previous efforts on this direction mainly failed by reasons of the limited training data and naive backbone network structures for object detection. In DSOD, we contribute a set of design principles for learning object detectors from scratch. One of the key principles is the deep supervision, enabled by layer-wise dense connections in both backbone networks and prediction layers, plays a critical role in learning good detectors from scratch. After involving several other principles, we build our DSOD based on the single-shot detection framework (SSD). We evaluate our method on PASCAL VOC 2007, 2012 and COCO datasets. DSOD achieves consistently better results than the state-of-the-art methods with much more compact models. Specifically, DSOD outperforms baseline method SSD on all three benchmarks, while requiring only 1/2 parameters. We also observe that DSOD can achieve comparable/slightly better results than Mask RCNN + FPN (under similar input size) with only 1/3 parameters, using no extra data or pre-trained models.

Includes members:
  Member "transfer learning for sequences via learning to collocate":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "diversity based generalization for neural unsupervised text classification under domain shift")
  Member "bottom up object detection by grouping extreme and center points":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "category wise attack transferable adversarial examples for anchor free object detection")
  Member "rethinking imagenet pre training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a large scale study of representation learning with the visual task adaptation benchmark")
  Member "cornernet detecting objects as paired keypoints":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "tiny dsod lightweight object detection for resource restricted usages":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "cluster pruning an efficient filter pruning method for edge ai vision applications")
  Member "group normalization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "on feature normalization and data augmentation")
  Member "yolov3 an incremental improvement":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "perception and decision making of autonomous systems in the era of learning an overview")
  Member "differentiable learning to normalize via switchable normalization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "adapted center and scale prediction more stable and more accurate")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)