human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "guiding deep learning system testing using surprise adequacy"):
  Abstract: Deep Learning (DL) systems are rapidly being adopted in safety and security critical domains, urgently calling for ways to test their correctness and robustness. Testing of DL systems has traditionally relied on manual collection and labelling of data. Recently, a number of coverage criteria based on neuron activation values have been proposed. These criteria essentially count the number of neurons whose activation during the execution of a DL system satisfied certain properties, such as being above predefined thresholds. However, existing coverage criteria are not sufficiently fine grained to capture subtle behaviours exhibited by DL systems. Moreover, evaluations have focused on showing correlation between adversarial examples and proposed criteria rather than evaluating and guiding their use for actual testing of DL systems. We propose a novel test adequacy criterion for testing of DL systems, called Surprise Adequacy for Deep Learning Systems (SADL), which is based on the behaviour of DL systems with respect to their training data. We measure the surprise of an input as the difference in DL system's behaviour between the input and the training data (i.e., what was learnt during training), and subsequently develop this as an adequacy criterion: a good test input should be sufficiently but not overtly surprising compared to training data. Empirical evaluation using a range of DL systems from simple image classifiers to autonomous driving car platforms shows that systematic sampling of inputs based on their surprise can improve classification accuracy of DL systems against adversarial examples by up to 77.5% via retraining.

Includes members:
  Member "deepgauge comprehensive and multi granularity testing criteria for gauging the robustness of deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "reliability validation of learning enabled vehicle tracking")
  Member "characterizing adversarial subspaces using local intrinsic dimensionality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "anomalous instance detection in deep learning a survey")
  Member "deepmutation mutation testing of deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "combinatorial testing for deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "raid randomized adversarial input detection for neural networks")
  Member "adversarial examples are not easily detected bypassing ten detection methods":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "deepxplore automated whitebox testing of deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "deeptest automated testing of deep neural network driven autonomous cars":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "technical report on the cleverhans v2 1 0 adversarial examples library":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "challenges and countermeasures for adversarial attacks on deep reinforcement learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)