human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "fast artificial immune systems"):
  Abstract: Various studies have shown that characteristic Artificial Immune System (AIS) operators such as hypermutations and ageing can be very efficient at escaping local optima of multimodal optimisation problems. However, this efficiency comes at the expense of considerably slower runtimes during the exploitation phase compared to standard evolutionary algorithms. We propose modifications to the traditional `hypermutations with mutation potential' (HMP) that allow them to be efficient at exploitation as well as maintaining their effective explorative characteristics. Rather than deterministically evaluating fitness after each bitflip of a hypermutation, we sample the fitness function stochastically with a `parabolic' distribution which allows the `stop at first constructive mutation' (FCM) variant of HMP to reduce the linear amount of wasted function evaluations when no improvement is found to a constant. By returning the best sampled solution during the hypermutation, rather than the first constructive mutation, we then turn the extremely inefficient HMP operator without FCM, into a very effective operator for the standard Opt-IA AIS using hypermutation, cloning and ageing. We rigorously prove the effectiveness of the two proposed operators by analysing them on all problems where the performance of HPM is rigorously understood in the literature. %

Includes members:
  Member "when hypermutations and ageing enable artificial immune systems to outperform evolutionary algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on inversely proportional hypermutations with mutation potential")
  Member "fast genetic algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "probabilistic tools for the analysis of randomized optimization heuristics")
  Member "standard steady state genetic algorithms can hillclimb faster than mutation only evolutionary algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "computational complexity analysis of genetic programming")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)