human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "convolutional neural networks for toxic comment classification"):
  Abstract: Flood of information is produced in a daily basis through the global Internet usage arising from the on-line interactive communications among users. While this situation contributes significantly to the quality of human life, unfortunately it involves enormous dangers, since on-line texts with high toxicity can cause personal attacks, on-line harassment and bullying behaviors. This has triggered both industrial and research community in the last few years while there are several tries to identify an efficient model for on-line toxic comment prediction. However, these steps are still in their infancy and new approaches and frameworks are required. On parallel, the data explosion that appears constantly, makes the construction of new machine learning computational tools for managing this information, an imperative need. Thankfully advances in hardware, cloud computing and big data management allow the development of Deep Learning approaches appearing very promising performance so far. For text classification in particular the use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have recently been proposed approaching text analytics in a modern manner emphasizing in the structure of words in a document. In this work, we employ this approach to discover toxic comments in a large pool of documents provided by a current Kaggle's competition regarding Wikipedia's talk page edits. To justify this decision we choose to compare CNNs against the traditional bag-of-words approach for text analysis combined with a selection of algorithms proven to be very effective in text classification. The reported results provide enough evidence that CNN enhance toxic comment classification reinforcing research interest towards this direction.

Includes members:
  Member "deceiving google s perspective api built for detecting toxic comments":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "wac a corpus of wikipedia conversations for online abuse detection")
  Member "ex machina personal attacks seen at scale":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "multilingual twitter corpus and baselines for evaluating demographic bias in hate speech recognition")
  Member "character level convolutional networks for text classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "description based text classification with reinforcement learning")
  Member "deep convolutional networks on graph structured data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "effective use of word order for text categorization with convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a unified system for aggression identification in english code mixed and uni lingual texts")
  Member "convolutional neural networks for sentence classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "natural language processing almost from scratch":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)