human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "mitigating wordline crosstalk using adaptive trees of counters"):
  Abstract: High access frequency of certain rows in the DRAM may cause data loss in cells of physically adjacent rows due to crosstalk. The malicious exploit of this crosstalk by repeatedly accessing a row to induce this effect is known as row hammering. Additionally, inadvertent row hammering may also occur due to the natural weighted nature of applications' access patterns. #R##N#In this paper, we analyze the efficiency of existing approaches for mitigating wordline crosstalk and demonstrate that they have been conservatively designed. Given the unbalanced nature of DRAM accesses, a small group of dynamically allocated counters in banks can deterministically detect hot rows and mitigate crosstalk. Based on our findings, we propose a Counter-based Adaptive Tree (CAT) approach to mitigate wordline crosstalk using adaptive trees of counters to guide appropriate refreshing of vulnerable rows. The key idea is to tune the distribution of the counters to the rows in a bank based on the memory reference patterns. In contrast to deterministic solutions, CAT utilizes fewer counters, making it practically feasible to be implemented on-chip. Compared to existing probabilistic approaches, CAT more precisely refreshes rows vulnerable to crosstalk based on their access frequency. #R##N#Experimental results on workloads from four benchmark suites show that CAT reduces the Crosstalk Mitigation Refresh Power Overhead in quad-core systems to 7%, which is an improvement over the 21% and 18% incurred in the leading deterministic and probabilistic approaches, respectively. Moreover, CAT incurs very low performance overhead (0.5%). Hardware synthesis evaluation shows that CAT can be implemented on-chip with only a nominal area overhead.

Includes members:
  Member "enabling fine grain restricted coset coding through word level compression for pcm":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "storage class memory principles problems and possibilities")
  Member "rowhammer js a remote software induced fault attack in javascript":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "are we susceptible to rowhammer an end to end methodology for cloud providers")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AR(Hardware Architecture)