human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "mpdcompress matrix permutation decomposition algorithm for deep neural network compression"):
  Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become the state-of-the-art technique for machine learning tasks in various applications. However, due to their size and the computational complexity, large DNNs are not readily deployable on edge devices in real-time. To manage complexity and accelerate computation, network compression techniques based on pruning and quantization have been proposed and shown to be effective in reducing network size. However, such network compression can result in irregular matrix structures that are mismatched with modern hardware-accelerated platforms, such as graphics processing units (GPUs) designed to perform the DNN matrix multiplications in a structured (block-based) way. We propose MPDCompress, a DNN compression algorithm based on matrix permutation decomposition via random mask generation. In-training application of the masks molds the synaptic weight connection matrix to a sub-graph separation format. Aided by the random permutations, a hardware-desirable block matrix is generated, allowing for a more efficient implementation and compression of the network. To show versatility, we empirically verify MPDCompress on several network models, compression rates, and image datasets. On the LeNet 300-100 model (MNIST dataset), Deep MNIST, and CIFAR10, we achieve 10 X network compression with less than 1% accuracy loss compared to non-compressed accuracy performance. On AlexNet for the full ImageNet ILSVRC-2012 dataset, we achieve 8 X network compression with less than 1% accuracy loss, with top-5 and top-1 accuracies of 79.6% and 56.4%, respectively. Finally, we observe that the algorithm can offer inference speedups across various hardware platforms, with 4 X faster operation achieved on several mobile GPUs.

Includes members:
  Member "shakeout a new approach to regularized deep neural network training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "asymptotic soft filter pruning for deep convolutional neural networks")
  Member "on the importance of stereo for accurate depth estimation an efficient semi supervised deep neural network approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "uncertainty depth estimation with gated images for 3d reconstruction")
  Member "toward low flying autonomous mav trail navigation using deep neural networks for environmental awareness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "aggressive perception aware navigation using deep optical flow dynamics and pixelmpc")
  Member "mobilenets efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "squeezenet alexnet level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and 0 5mb model size":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "lossless compression of deep neural networks")
  Member "deeppicar a low cost deep neural network based autonomous car":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "dynamic weighted simplex strategy for learning enabled cyber physical systems")
  Member "structured deep neural network pruning via matrix pivoting":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "tuning algorithms and generators for efficient edge inference")
  Member "sep nets small and effective pattern networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "mdinference balancing inference accuracy andlatency for mobile applications")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)