human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "adversarial binaries for authorship identification"):
  Abstract: Binary code authorship identification determines authors of a binary program. Existing techniques have used supervised machine learning for this task. In this paper, we look this problem from an attacker's perspective. We aim to modify a test binary, such that it not only causes misprediction but also maintains the functionality of the original input binary. Attacks against binary code are intrinsically more difficult than attacks against domains such as computer vision, where attackers can change each pixel of the input image independently and still maintain a valid image. For binary code, even flipping one bit of a binary may cause the binary to be invalid, to crash at the run-time, or to lose the original functionality. We investigate two types of attacks: untargeted attacks, causing misprediction to any of the incorrect authors, and targeted attacks, causing misprediction to a specific one among the incorrect authors. We develop two key attack capabilities: feature vector modification, generating an adversarial feature vector that both corresponds to a real binary and causes the required misprediction, and input binary modification, modifying the input binary to match the adversarial feature vector while maintaining the functionality of the input binary. We evaluated our attack against classifiers trained with a state-of-the-art method for authorship attribution. The classifiers for authorship identification have 91% accuracy on average. Our untargeted attack has a 96% success rate on average, showing that we can effectively suppress authorship signal. Our targeted attack has a 46% success rate on average, showing that it is possible, but significantly more difficult to impersonate a specific programmer's style. Our attack reveals that existing binary code authorship identification techniques rely on code features that are easy to modify, and thus are vulnerable to attacks.

Includes members:
  Member "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence")
  Member "when coding style survives compilation de anonymizing programmers from executable binaries":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "parallelizing binary code analysis")
  Member "dolphinattack inaudible voice commands":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "ghostimage perception domain attacks against vision based object classification systems")
  Member "transferability in machine learning from phenomena to black box attacks using adversarial samples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "the limitations of deep learning in adversarial settings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "adam a method for stochastic optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "evasion attacks against machine learning at test time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)