human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "training set debugging using trusted items"):
  Abstract: Training set bugs are flaws in the data that adversely affect machine learning. The training set is usually too large for man- ual inspection, but one may have the resources to verify a few trusted items. The set of trusted items may not by itself be adequate for learning, so we propose an algorithm that uses these items to identify bugs in the training set and thus im- proves learning. Specifically, our approach seeks the smallest set of changes to the training set labels such that the model learned from this corrected training set predicts labels of the trusted items correctly. We flag the items whose labels are changed as potential bugs, whose labels can be checked for veracity by human experts. To find the bugs in this way is a challenging combinatorial bilevel optimization problem, but it can be relaxed into a continuous optimization problem. Ex- periments on toy and real data demonstrate that our approach can identify training set bugs effectively and suggest appro- priate changes to the labels. Our algorithm is a step toward trustworthy machine learning.

Includes members:
  Member "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "smoothgrad removing noise by adding noise":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "self supervised discovering of causal features towards interpretable reinforcement learning")
  Member "gradients of counterfactuals":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "robust saliency maps with decoy enhanced saliency score")
  Member "algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "equality of opportunity in supervised learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "identifying mislabeled training data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "improving training on noisy stuctured labels")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)