human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "can adversarially robust learning leverage computational hardness"):
  Abstract: Making learners robust to adversarial perturbation at test time (i.e., evasion attacks) or training time (i.e., poisoning attacks) has emerged as a challenging task. It is known that for some natural settings, sublinear perturbations in the training phase or the testing phase can drastically decrease the quality of the predictions. These negative results, however, are information theoretic and only prove the existence of such successful adversarial perturbations. A natural question for these settings is whether or not we can make classifiers computationally robust to polynomial-time attacks. #R##N#In this work, we prove strong barriers against achieving such envisioned computational robustness both for evasion and poisoning attacks. In particular, we show that if the test instances come from a product distribution (e.g., uniform over $\{0,1\}^n$ or $[0,1]^n$, or isotropic $n$-variate Gaussian) and that there is an initial constant error, then there exists a polynomial-time attack that finds adversarial examples of Hamming distance $O(\sqrt n)$. For poisoning attacks, we prove that for any learning algorithm with sample complexity $m$ and any efficiently computable "predicate" defining some "bad" property $B$ for the produced hypothesis (e.g., failing on a particular test) that happens with an initial constant probability, there exist polynomial-time online poisoning attacks that tamper with $O (\sqrt m)$ many examples, replace them with other correctly labeled examples, and increases the probability of the bad event $B$ to $\approx 1$. #R##N#Both of our poisoning and evasion attacks are black-box in how they access their corresponding components of the system (i.e., the hypothesis, the concept, and the learning algorithm) and make no further assumptions about the classifier or the learning algorithm producing the classifier.

Includes members:
  Member "multi party poisoning through generalized p tampering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "eavesdrop the composition proportion of training labels in federated learning")
  Member "approximate nearest neighbor search in high dimensions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "copt coordinated optimal transport on graphs")
  Member "efficient algorithms and lower bounds for robust linear regression":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "certified robustness to label flipping attacks via randomized smoothing")
  Member "adversarial vulnerability for any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "utilizing network properties to detect erroneous inputs")
  Member "sever a robust meta algorithm for stochastic optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on the effectiveness of mitigating data poisoning attacks with gradient shaping")
  Member "improved generalization bounds for robust learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adversarially robust low dimensional representations")
  Member "are adversarial examples inevitable":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "anomalous instance detection in deep learning a survey")
  Member "adversarially robust generalization requires more data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)