human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "optimal strategies for patrolling fences"):
  Abstract: A classical multi-agent fence patrolling problem asks: What is the maximum length $L$ of a line that $k$ agents with maximum speeds $v_1,\ldots,v_k$ can patrol if each point on the line needs to be visited at least once every unit of time. It is easy to see that $L = \alpha \sum_{i=1}^k v_i$ for some efficiency $\alpha \in [\frac{1}{2},1)$. After a series of works giving better and better efficiencies, it was conjectured that the best possible efficiency approaches $\frac{2}{3}$. No upper bounds on the efficiency below $1$ were known. We prove the first such upper bounds and tightly bound the optimal efficiency in terms of the minimum ratio of speeds $s = \frac{v_{\max}}{v_{\min}}$ and the number of agents $k$. Our bounds of $\alpha \leq \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{s}}$ and $\alpha \leq 1 - \frac{1}{2\sqrt{k}}$ imply that in order to achieve efficiency $1 - \epsilon$, at least $k \geq \Omega(\epsilon^{-2})$ agents with a speed ratio of $s \geq \Omega(\epsilon^{-1})$ are necessary. Guided by our upper bounds, we construct a scheme whose efficiency approaches $1$, disproving the conjecture of Kawamura and Soejima. Our scheme asymptotically matches our upper bounds in terms of the maximal speed difference and the number of agents used, proving them to be asymptotically tight.

Includes members:
  Member "fence patrolling by mobile agents with distinct speeds":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "patrolling on dynamic ring networks")
  Member "simple strategies versus optimal schedules in multi agent patrolling":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "computing the k resilience of a synchronized multi robot system")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)