human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "an efficient primal dual algorithm for fair combinatorial optimization problems"):
  Abstract: We consider a general class of combinatorial optimization problems including among others allocation, multiple knapsack, matching or travelling salesman problems. The standard version of those problems is the maximum weight optimization problem where a sum of values is optimized. However, the sum is not a good aggregation function when the fairness of the distribution of those values (corresponding for example to different agents' utilities or criteria) is important. In this paper, using the generalized Gini index (GGI), a well-known inequality measure, instead of the sum to model fairness, we formulate a new general problem, that we call fair combinatorial optimization. Although GGI is a non-linear aggregating function, a $0,1$-linear program (IP) can be formulated for finding a GGI-optimal solution by exploiting a linearization of GGI proposed by Ogryczak and Sliwinski. However, the time spent by commercial solvers (e.g., CPLEX, Gurobi...) for solving (IP) increases very quickly with instances' size and can reach hours even for relatively small-sized ones. As a faster alternative, we propose a heuristic for solving (IP) based on a primal-dual approach using Lagrangian decomposition. %We experimentally evaluate our methods against the exact solution of (IP) by CPLEX on several fair optimization problems related to matching to demonstrate the efficiency of our proposition. We demonstrate the efficiency of our method by evaluating it against the exact solution of (IP) by CPLEX on several fair optimization problems related to matching. The numerical results show that our method outputs in a very short time efficient solutions giving lower bounds that CPLEX may take several orders of magnitude longer to obtain. Moreover, for instances for which we know the optimal value, these solutions are quasi-optimal with optimality gap less than 0.3%.

Includes members:
  Member "projection onto the capped simplex":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "online convex optimization for caching networks")
  Member "the multiobjective multidimensional knapsack problem a survey and a new approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the 0 1 knapsack problem with qualitative levels")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)