human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "fair leader election for rational agents in asynchronous rings and networks"):
  Abstract: We study a game theoretic model where a coalition of processors might collude to bias the outcome of the protocol, where we assume that the processors always prefer any legitimate outcome over a non-legitimate one. We show that the problems of Fair Leader Election and Fair Coin Toss are equivalent, and focus on Fair Leader Election.   Our main focus is on a directed asynchronous ring of n processors, where we investigate the protocol proposed by Abraham et al. [4] and studied in Afek et al. [5]. We show that in general the protocol is resilient only to sub-linear size coalitions. Specifically, we show that Ω( p n logn) randomly located processors or Ω( 3 √ n) adversarially located processors can force any outcome. We complement this by showing that the protocol is resilient to any adversarial coalition of size O( 4 √ n). We propose a modification to the protocol, and show that it is resilient to every coalition of size ?( √ n), by exhibiting both an attack and a resilience result.   For every k ≥ 1, we define a family of graphs Gk that can be simulated by trees where each node in the tree simulates at most k processors. We show that for every graph in Gk , there is no fair leader election protocol that is resilient to coalitions of size k. Our result generalizes a previous result of Abraham et al. [4] that states that for every graph, there is no fair leader election protocol which is resilient to coalitions of size ?n/2 ?.

Includes members:
  Member "rational fair consensus in the gossip model":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "cheating by duplication equilibrium requires global knowledge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the role of a priori information in networks of rational agents")
  Member "lower bounds on implementing robust and resilient mediators":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the role of a priori information in networks of rational agents")
  Member "rational secret sharing and multiparty computation extended abstract":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "sok tools for game theoretic models of security for cryptocurrencies")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)