human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "discovering low precision networks close to full precision networks for efficient embedded inference"):
  Abstract: To realize the promise of ubiquitous embedded deep network inference, it is essential to seek limits of energy and area efficiency. To this end, low-precision networks offer tremendous promise because both energy and area scale down quadratically with the reduction in precision. Here we demonstrate ResNet-18, -34, -50, -152, Inception-v3, Densenet-161, and VGG-16bn networks on the ImageNet classification benchmark that, at 8-bit precision exceed the accuracy of the full-precision baseline networks after one epoch of finetuning, thereby leveraging the availability of pretrained models. We also demonstrate ResNet-18, -34, -50, -152, Densenet-161, and VGG-16bn 4-bit models that match the accuracy of the full-precision baseline networks -- the highest scores to date. Surprisingly, the weights of the low-precision networks are very close (in cosine similarity) to the weights of the corresponding baseline networks, making training from scratch unnecessary. #R##N#We find that gradient noise due to quantization during training increases with reduced precision, and seek ways to overcome this noise. The number of iterations required by SGD to achieve a given training error is related to the square of (a) the distance of the initial solution from the final plus (b) the maximum variance of the gradient estimates. Therefore, we (a) reduce solution distance by starting with pretrained fp32 precision baseline networks and fine-tuning, and (b) combat gradient noise introduced by quantization by training longer and reducing learning rates. Sensitivity analysis indicates that these simple techniques, coupled with proper activation function range calibration to take full advantage of the limited precision, are sufficient to discover low-precision networks, if they exist, close to fp32 precision baseline networks. The results herein provide evidence that 4-bits suffice for classification.

Includes members:
  Member "uniq uniform noise injection for the quantization of neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "feature map transform coding for energy efficient cnn inference")
  Member "training and inference with integers in deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sparse weight activation training")
  Member "model compression via distillation and quantization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "gan compression efficient architectures for interactive conditional gans")
  Member "high accuracy low precision training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "sparse weight activation training")
  Member "learning to quantize deep networks by optimizing quantization intervals with task loss":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "binaryrelax a relaxation approach for training deep neural networks with quantized weights":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "gradient ell_1 regularization for quantization robustness")
  Member "pact parameterized clipping activation for quantized neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "averaging weights leads to wider optima and better generalization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "sqwa stochastic quantized weight averaging for improving the generalization capability of low precision deep neural networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)