human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "depth and nonlinearity induce implicit exploration for rl"):
  Abstract: The question of how to explore, i.e., take actions with uncertain outcomes to learn about possible future rewards, is a key question in reinforcement learning (RL). Here, we show a surprising result: We show that Q-learning with nonlinear Q-function and no explicit exploration (i.e., a purely greedy policy) can learn several standard benchmark tasks, including mountain car, equally well as, or better than, the most commonly-used $\epsilon$-greedy exploration. We carefully examine this result and show that both the depth of the Q-network and the type of nonlinearity are important to induce such deterministic exploration.

Includes members:
  Member "simple random search provides a competitive approach to reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving a survey")
  Member "deep exploration via bootstrapped dqn":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ride rewarding impact driven exploration for procedurally generated environments")
  Member "benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for continuous control":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "review analyze and design a comprehensive deep reinforcement learning framework")
  Member "deep reinforcement learning with double q learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "adam a method for stochastic optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)