human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on cognitive preferences and the plausibility of rule based models"):
  Abstract: It is conventional wisdom in machine learning and data mining that logical models such as rule sets are more interpretable than other models, and that among such rule-based models, simpler models are more interpretable than more complex ones. In this position paper, we question this latter assumption by focusing on one particular aspect of interpretability, namely the plausibility of models. Roughly speaking, we equate the plausibility of a model with the likeliness that a user accepts it as an explanation for a prediction. In particular, we argue that, all other things being equal, longer explanations may be more convincing than shorter ones, and that the predominant bias for shorter models, which is typically necessary for learning powerful discriminative models, may not be suitable when it comes to user acceptance of the learned models. To that end, we first recapitulate evidence for and against this postulate, and then report the results of an evaluation in a crowd-sourcing study based on about 3.000 judgments. The results do not reveal a strong preference for simple rules, whereas we can observe a weak preference for longer rules in some domains. We then relate these results to well-known cognitive biases such as the conjunction fallacy, the representative heuristic, or the recogition heuristic, and investigate their relation to rule length and plausibility.

Includes members:
  Member "tip typifying the interpretability of procedures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "explainable deep learning for video recognition tasks a framework recommendations")
  Member "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "reasoning in non probabilistic uncertainty logic programming and neural symbolic computing as examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the next decade in ai four steps towards robust artificial intelligence")
  Member "harnessing deep neural networks with logic rules":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "natural language qa approaches using reasoning with external knowledge")
  Member "on the latent variable interpretation in sum product networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "advances in machine learning for the behavioral sciences")
  Member "the mythos of model interpretability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "deep learning in neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "π nets deep polynomial neural networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)