human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "why comparing single performance scores does not allow to draw conclusions about machine learning approaches"):
  Abstract: Developing state-of-the-art approaches for specific tasks is a major driving force in our research community. Depending on the prestige of the task, publishing it can come along with a lot of visibility. The question arises how reliable are our evaluation methodologies to compare approaches?#R##N#One common methodology to identify the state-of-the-art is to partition data into a train, a development and a test set. Researchers can train and tune their approach on some part of the dataset and then select the model that worked best on the development set for a final evaluation on unseen test data. Test scores from different approaches are compared, and performance differences are tested for statistical significance.#R##N#In this publication, we show that there is a high risk that a statistical significance in this type of evaluation is not due to a superior learning approach. Instead, there is a high risk that the difference is due to chance. For example for the CoNLL 2003 NER dataset we observed in up to 26% of the cases type I errors (false positives) with a threshold of p < 0.05, i.e., falsely concluding a statistically significant difference between two identical approaches.#R##N#We prove that this evaluation setup is unsuitable to compare learning approaches. We formalize alternative evaluation setups based on score distributions.

Includes members:
  Member "semeval 2017 task 1 semantic textual similarity multilingual and crosslingual focused evaluation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "reporting score distributions makes a difference performance study of lstm networks for sequence tagging":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards the systematic reporting of the energy and carbon footprints of machine learning")
  Member "optimal hyperparameters for deep lstm networks for sequence labeling tasks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "rethinking generalization of neural models a named entity recognition case study")
  Member "end to end sequence labeling via bi directional lstm cnns crf":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "secnlp a survey of embeddings in clinical natural language processing")
  Member "neural architectures for named entity recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "knowledge graphs")
  Member "going deeper with convolutions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)