human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "modularity matters learning invariant relational reasoning tasks"):
  Abstract: We focus on two supervised visual reasoning tasks whose labels encode a semantic relational rule between two or more objects in an image: the MNIST Parity task and the colorized Pentomino task. The objects in the images undergo random translation, scaling, rotation and coloring transformations. Thus these tasks involve invariant relational reasoning. We report uneven performance of various deep CNN models on these two tasks. For the MNIST Parity task, we report that the VGG19 model soundly outperforms a family of ResNet models. Moreover, the family of ResNet models exhibits a general sensitivity to random initialization for the MNIST Parity task. For the colorized Pentomino task, now both the VGG19 and ResNet models exhibit sluggish optimization and very poor test generalization, hovering around 30% test error. The CNN we tested all learn hierarchies of fully distributed features and thus encode the distributed representation prior. We are motivated by a hypothesis from cognitive neuroscience which posits that the human visual cortex is modularized, and this allows the visual cortex to learn higher order invariances. To this end, we consider a modularized variant of the ResNet model, referred to as a Residual Mixture Network (ResMixNet) which employs a mixture-of-experts architecture to interleave distributed representations with more specialized, modular representations. We show that very shallow ResMixNets are capable of learning each of the two tasks well, attaining less than 2% and 1% test error on the MNIST Parity and the colorized Pentomino tasks respectively. Most importantly, the ResMixNet models are extremely parameter efficient: generalizing better than various non-modular CNNs that have over 10x the number of parameters. These experimental results support the hypothesis that modularity is a robust prior for learning invariant relational reasoning.

Includes members:
  Member "outrageously large neural networks the sparsely gated mixture of experts layer":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "attention over parameters for dialogue systems")
  Member "a simple neural network module for relational reasoning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "relationship embedded representation learning for grounding referring expressions")
  Member "aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")
  Member "clevr a diagnostic dataset for compositional language and elementary visual reasoning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "3d dynamic scene graphs actionable spatial perception with places objects and humans")
  Member "hierarchical question image co attention for visual question answering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "relationship embedded representation learning for grounding referring expressions")
  Member "deep compositional question answering with neural module networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "cq vqa visual question answering on categorized questions")
  Member "batch normalization accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "on invariance and selectivity in representation learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "are we done with object recognition the icub robot s perspective")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)