human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "are good local minima wide in sparse recovery"):
  Abstract: The idea of compressed sensing is to exploit representations in suitable (overcomplete) dictionaries that allow to recover signals far beyond the Nyquist rate provided that they admit a sparse representation in the respective dictionary. The latter gives rise to the sparse recovery problem of finding the best sparse linear approximation of given data in a given generating system. In this paper we analyze the iterative hard thresholding (IHT) algorithm as one of the most popular greedy methods for solving the sparse recovery problem, and demonstrate that systematically perturbing the IHT algorithm by adding noise to intermediate iterates yields improved results. Further improvements can be obtained by entirely rephrasing the problem as a parametric deep-learning-type of optimization problem. By introducing perturbations via dropout, we demonstrate to significantly outperform the classical IHT algorithm, obtaining $3$ to $6$ times lower average objective errors.

Includes members:
  Member "a bag of words equivalent recurrent neural network for action recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "learnable pooling with context gating for video classification")
  Member "on learning optimized reaction diffusion processes for effective image restoration":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning enriched features for real image restoration and enhancement")
  Member "iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "efficient active learning of sparse halfspaces with arbitrary bounded noise")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)