human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "cavbench a benchmark suite for connected and autonomous vehicles"):
  Abstract: Connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) have recently attracted a significant amount of attention both from researchers and industry. Numerous studies targeting algorithms, software frameworks, and applications on the CAVs scenario have emerged. Meanwhile, several pioneer efforts have focused on the edge computing system and architecture design for the CAVs scenario and provided various heterogeneous platform prototypes for CAVs. However, a standard and comprehensive application benchmark for CAVs is missing, hindering the study of these emerging computing systems. To address this challenging problem, we present CAVBench, the first benchmark suite for the edge computing system in the CAVs scenario. CAVBench is comprised of six typical applications covering four dominate CAVs scenarios and takes four datasets as standard input. CAVBench provides quantitative evaluation results via application and system perspective output metrics. We perform a series of experiments and acquire three systemic characteristics of the applications in CAVBench. First, the operation intensity of the applications is polarized, which explains why heterogeneous hardware is important for a CAVs computing system. Second, all applications in CAVBench consume high memory bandwidth, so the system should be equipped with high bandwidth memory or leverage good memory bandwidth management to avoid the performance degradation caused by memory bandwidth competition. Third, some applications have worse data/instruction locality based on the cache miss observation, so the computing system targeting these applications should optimize the cache architecture. Last, we use the CAVBench to evaluate a typical edge computing platform and present the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the benchmarking results.

Includes members:
  Member "combined image and world space tracking in traffic scenes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "joint 3d tracking and forecasting with graph neural network and diversity sampling")
  Member "mot16 a benchmark for multi object tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "stem seg spatio temporal embeddings for instance segmentation in videos")
  Member "a unified multi scale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "ha ccn hierarchical attention based crowd counting network")
  Member "ssd single shot multibox detector":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "learning to track at 100 fps with deep regression networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "object adaptive lstm network for real time visual tracking with adversarial data augmentation")
  Member "you only look once unified real time object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "motchallenge 2015 towards a benchmark for multi target tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "stem seg spatio temporal embeddings for instance segmentation in videos")
  Member "introducing slambench a performance and accuracy benchmarking methodology for slam":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "good feature matching towards accurate robust vo vslam with low latency")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)