human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "combining fact extraction and verification with neural semantic matching networks"):
  Abstract: The increasing concern with misinformation has stimulated research efforts on automatic fact checking. The recently-released FEVER dataset introduced a benchmark fact-verification task in which a system is asked to verify a claim using evidential sentences from Wikipedia documents. In this paper, we present a connected system consisting of three homogeneous neural semantic matching models that conduct document retrieval, sentence selection, and claim verification jointly for fact extraction and verification. For evidence retrieval (document retrieval and sentence selection), unlike traditional vector space IR models in which queries and sources are matched in some pre-designed term vector space, we develop neural models to perform deep semantic matching from raw textual input, assuming no intermediate term representation and no access to structured external knowledge bases. We also show that Pageview frequency can also help improve the performance of evidence retrieval results, that later can be matched by using our neural semantic matching network. For claim verification, unlike previous approaches that simply feed upstream retrieved evidence and the claim to a natural language inference (NLI) model, we further enhance the NLI model by providing it with internal semantic relatedness scores (hence integrating it with the evidence retrieval modules) and ontological WordNet features. Experiments on the FEVER dataset indicate that (1) our neural semantic matching method outperforms popular TF-IDF and encoder models, by significant margins on all evidence retrieval metrics, (2) the additional relatedness score and WordNet features improve the NLI model via better semantic awareness, and (3) by formalizing all three subtasks as a similar semantic matching problem and improving on all three stages, the complete model is able to achieve the state-of-the-art results on the FEVER test set.

Includes members:
  Member "adaptive document retrieval for deep question answering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a study on efficiency accuracy and document structure for answer sentence selection")
  Member "natural language inference over interaction space":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "adversarial nli a new benchmark for natural language understanding")
  Member "supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "neural ranking models with weak supervision":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "selective weak supervision for neural information retrieval")
  Member "r 3 reinforced reader ranker for open domain question answering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "k adapter infusing knowledge into pre trained models with adapters")
  Member "quasar datasets for question answering by search and reading":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "k adapter infusing knowledge into pre trained models with adapters")
  Member "shortcut stacked sentence encoders for multi domain inference":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "stress test evaluation of transformer based models in natural language understanding tasks")
  Member "automatic detection of fake news":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "hgat hierarchical graph attention network for fake news detection")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)