human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "knowledge and blameworthiness"):
  Abstract: Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined in terms of the principle of alternative possibilities: for the coalition to be responsible for an outcome, the outcome must take place and the coalition should have had a strategy to prevent it. In this article we argue that in the settings with imperfect information, not only should the coalition have had a strategy, but it also should have known that it had a strategy, and it should have known what the strategy was. The main technical result of the article is a sound and complete bimodal logic that describes the interplay between knowledge and blameworthiness in strategic games with imperfect information.

Includes members:
  Member "blameworthiness in strategic games":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "duty to warn in strategic games")
  Member "strategically knowing how":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "intelligence in strategic games")
  Member "coalition and group announcement logic":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "strategic coalitions in stochastic games")
  Member "strategic coalitions with perfect recall":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "intelligence in strategic games")
  Member "together we know how to achieve an epistemic logic of know how":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "intelligence in strategic games")
  Member "a logic of knowing how":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "intelligence in strategic games")
  Member "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "sat based atl satisfiability checking")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)