human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "improving machine reading comprehension with general reading strategies"):
  Abstract: Reading strategies have been shown to improve comprehension levels, especially for readers lacking adequate prior knowledge. Just as the process of knowledge accumulation is time-consuming for human readers, it is resource-demanding to impart rich general domain knowledge into a deep language model via pre-training. Inspired by reading strategies identified in cognitive science, and given limited computational resources -- just a pre-trained model and a fixed number of training instances -- we propose three general strategies aimed to improve non-extractive machine reading comprehension (MRC): (i) BACK AND FORTH READING that considers both the original and reverse order of an input sequence, (ii) HIGHLIGHTING, which adds a trainable embedding to the text embedding of tokens that are relevant to the question and candidate answers, and (iii) SELF-ASSESSMENT that generates practice questions and candidate answers directly from the text in an unsupervised manner. #R##N#By fine-tuning a pre-trained language model (Radford et al., 2018) with our proposed strategies on the largest general domain multiple-choice MRC dataset RACE, we obtain a 5.8% absolute increase in accuracy over the previous best result achieved by the same pre-trained model fine-tuned on RACE without the use of strategies. We further fine-tune the resulting model on a target MRC task, leading to an absolute improvement of 6.2% in average accuracy over previous state-of-the-art approaches on six representative non-extractive MRC datasets from different domains (i.e., ARC, OpenBookQA, MCTest, SemEval-2018 Task 11, ROCStories, and MultiRC). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed strategies and the versatility and general applicability of our fine-tuned models that incorporate these strategies. Core code is available at this https URL.

Includes members:
  Member "eliminet a model for eliminating options for reading comprehension with multiple choice questions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "gennet reading comprehension with multiple choice questions using generation and selection model")
  Member "multi granularity hierarchical attention fusion networks for reading comprehension and question answering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a study of the tasks and models in machine reading comprehension")
  Member "generating wikipedia by summarizing long sequences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "what makes reading comprehension questions easier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "beat the ai investigating adversarial human annotations for reading comprehension")
  Member "think you have solved question answering try arc the ai2 reasoning challenge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "natural language qa approaches using reasoning with external knowledge")
  Member "coqa a conversational question answering challenge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "multi range reasoning for machine comprehension":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "dual multi head co attention for multi choice reading comprehension")
  Member "hfl rc system at semeval 2018 task 11 hybrid multi aspects model for commonsense reading comprehension":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "convolutional spatial attention model for reading comprehension with multiple choice questions")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)