human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "decidability results for atl with imperfect information and perfect recall"):
  Abstract: Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL*) is a central logic for multiagent systems. Its extension to the imperfect information setting (ATL*i ) is well known to have an undecidable model-checking problem when agents have perfect recall. Studies have thus mostly focused either on agents without memory, or on alternative semantics to retrieve decidability. In this work we establish new decidability results for agents with perfect recall: We first prove a meta-theorem that allows the transfer of decidability results for classes of multiplayer games with imperfect information, such as games with hierarchical observation, to the model-checking problem for ATL*i . We then establish that model checking ATL* with strategy context and imperfect information is decidable when restricted to hierarchical instances.

Includes members:
  Member "quantified ctl with imperfect information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "hierarchical information patterns and distributed strategy synthesis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "strategy logic with imperfect information")
  Member "atlsc with partial observation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "strategy logic with imperfect information")
  Member "quantified ctl expressiveness and complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "reasoning about quality and fuzziness of strategic behaviours")
  Member "model checking atl under imperfect information and perfect recall semantics is undecidable":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "sat based atl satisfiability checking")
  Member "reasoning about strategies on the model checking problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "reconfigurable interaction for mas modelling")
  Member "model checking an alternating time temporal logic with knowledge imperfect information perfect recall and communicating coalitions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "reasoning about knowledge and strategies under hierarchical information")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)