human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals rao stirling diversity relative variety and the gini coefficient"):
  Abstract: Questions of definition and measurement continue to constrain a consensus on the measurement of interdisciplinarity. Using Rao-Stirling (RS) Diversity produces sometimes anomalous results. We argue that these unexpected outcomes can be related to the use of "dual-concept diversity" which combines "variety" and "balance" in the definitions (ex ante). We propose to modify RS Diversity into a new indicator (DIV) which operationalizes variety, balance, and disparity independently and then combines them ex post. "Balance" can be measured using the Gini coefficient. We apply DIV to the aggregated citation patterns of 11,487 journals covered by the Journal Citation Reports 2016 of the Science Citation Index and the Social Sciences Citation Index as an empirical domain and, in more detail, to the citation patterns of 85 journals assigned to the Web-of-Science category "information science & library science" in both the cited and citing directions. We compare the results of the indicators and show that DIV provides improved results in terms of distinguishing between interdisciplinary knowledge integration (citing) versus knowledge diffusion (cited). The new diversity indicator and RS diversity measure different features. A routine for the measurement of the various operationalizations of diversity (in any data matrix) is made available online.

Includes members:
  Member "creativity in science and the link to cited references is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "an evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact and a proposal for making them better")
  Member "diversity and interdisciplinarity how can one distinguish and recombine disparity variety and balance":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "mapping patent classifications portfolio and statistical analysis and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "diversity and interdisciplinarity how can one distinguish and recombine disparity variety and balance")
  Member "betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity a tribute to eugene garfield":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "diversity and interdisciplinarity how can one distinguish and recombine disparity variety and balance")
  Member "information metrics imetrics a research specialty with a socio cognitive identity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a novel method for depicting academic disciplines through google scholar citations the case of bibliometrics")
  Member "how journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research a comparison between innovation studies and business management":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the differing meanings of indicators under different policy contexts the case of internationalisation")
  Member "towards a new crown indicator some theoretical considerations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators")
  Member "indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals diversity centrality and citations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "comparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)