human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "eegnet a compact convolutional neural network for eeg based brain computer interfaces"):
  Abstract: Brain computer interfaces (BCI) enable direct communication with a computer, using neural activity as the control signal. This neural signal is generally chosen from a variety of well-studied electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. For a given BCI paradigm, feature extractors and classifiers are tailored to the distinct characteristics of its expected EEG control signal, limiting its application to that specific signal. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), which have been used in computer vision and speech recognition, have successfully been applied to EEG-based BCIs; however, they have mainly been applied to single BCI paradigms and thus it remains unclear how these architectures generalize to other paradigms. Here, we ask if we can design a single CNN architecture to accurately classify EEG signals from different BCI paradigms, while simultaneously being as compact as possible. In this work we introduce EEGNet, a compact convolutional network for EEG-based BCIs. We introduce the use of depthwise and separable convolutions to construct an EEG-specific model which encapsulates well-known EEG feature extraction concepts for BCI. We compare EEGNet to current state-of-the-art approaches across four BCI paradigms: P300 visual-evoked potentials, error-related negativity responses (ERN), movement-related cortical potentials (MRCP), and sensory motor rhythms (SMR). We show that EEGNet generalizes across paradigms better than the reference algorithms when only limited training data is available. We demonstrate three different approaches to visualize the contents of a trained EEGNet model to enable interpretation of the learned features. Our results suggest that EEGNet is robust enough to learn a wide variety of interpretable features over a range of BCI tasks, suggesting that the observed performances were not due to artifact or noise sources in the data.

Includes members:
  Member "methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sam the sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters")
  Member "deep learning with convolutional neural networks for eeg decoding and visualization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "collaborative inference for efficient remote monitoring")
  Member "learning important features through propagating activation differences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "towards better understanding of gradient based attribution methods for deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "explaining explanations axiomatic feature interactions for deep networks")
  Member "learning robust features using deep learning for automatic seizure detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "temporal graph convolutional networks for automatic seizure detection")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "xception deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "deepfakes and beyond a survey of face manipulation and fake detection")
  Member "tensorflow a system for large scale machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)