human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deep item based collaborative filtering for top n recommendation"):
  Abstract: Item-based Collaborative Filtering(short for ICF) has been widely adopted in recommender systems in industry, owing to its strength in user interest modeling and ease in online personalization. By constructing a user's profile with the items that the user has consumed, ICF recommends items that are similar to the user's profile. With the prevalence of machine learning in recent years, significant processes have been made for ICF by learning item similarity (or representation) from data. Nevertheless, we argue that most existing works have only considered linear and shallow relationship between items, which are insufficient to capture the complicated decision-making process of users. #R##N#In this work, we propose a more expressive ICF solution by accounting for the nonlinear and higher-order relationship among items. Going beyond modeling only the second-order interaction (e.g. similarity) between two items, we additionally consider the interaction among all interacted item pairs by using nonlinear neural networks. Through this way, we can effectively model the higher-order relationship among items, capturing more complicated effects in user decision-making. For example, it can differentiate which historical itemsets in a user's profile are more important in affecting the user to make a purchase decision on an item. We treat this solution as a deep variant of ICF, thus term it as DeepICF. To justify our proposal, we perform empirical studies on two public datasets from MovieLens and Pinterest. Extensive experiments verify the highly positive effect of higher-order item interaction modeling with nonlinear neural networks. Moreover, we demonstrate that by more fine-grained second-order interaction modeling with attention network, the performance of our DeepICF method can be further improved.

Includes members:
  Member "deep learning based recommender system a survey and new perspectives":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "explainable recommendation a survey and new perspectives":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey on knowledge graph based recommender systems")
  Member "nais neural attentive item similarity model for recommendation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "lightgcn simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation")
  Member "neural factorization machines for sparse predictive analytics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "parameter efficient transfer from sequential behaviors for user profiling and recommendation")
  Member "neural collaborative filtering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "advances in collaborative filtering and ranking")
  Member "item silk road recommending items from information domains to social users":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "fast matrix factorization for online recommendation with implicit feedback":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "learning to hash with graph neural networks for recommender systems")
  Member "related pins at pinterest the evolution of a real world recommender system":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "handling position bias for unbiased learning to rank in hotels search")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)