human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "can one escape red chains regular path queries determinacy is undecidable"):
  Abstract: For a given set of queries (which are expressions in some query language) $\mathcal{Q}=\{Q_1$, $Q_2, \ldots Q_k\}$ and for another query $Q_0$ we say that $\mathcal{Q}$ determines $Q_0$ if -- informally speaking -- for every database $\mathbb D$, the information contained in the views $\mathcal{Q}({\mathbb D})$ is sufficient to compute $Q_0({\mathbb D})$. Query Determinacy Problem is the problem of deciding, for given $\mathcal{Q}$ and $Q_0$, whether $\mathcal{Q}$ determines $Q_0$. Many versions of this problem, for different query languages, were studied in database theory. In this paper we solve a problem stated in [CGLV02] and show that Query Determinacy Problem is undecidable for the Regular Path Queries -- the paradigmatic query language of graph databases.

Includes members:
  Member "red spider meets a rainworm conjunctive query finite determinacy is undecidable":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on monotonic determinacy and rewritability for recursive queries and views")
  Member "the hunt for a red spider conjunctive query determinacy is undecidable":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on monotonic determinacy and rewritability for recursive queries and views")
  Member "datalog rewritings of regular path queries using views":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on monotonic determinacy and rewritability for recursive queries and views")
  Member "the view update problem revisited":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "red spider meets a rainworm conjunctive query finite determinacy is undecidable")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)