human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "popular matchings and limits to tractability"):
  Abstract: We consider popular matching problems in both bipartite and non-bipartite graphs with strict preference lists. It is known that every stable matching is a min-size popular matching. A subclass of max-size popular matchings called dominant matchings has been well-studied in bipartite graphs: they always exist and there is a simple linear time algorithm to find one. #R##N#We show that stable and dominant matchings are the only two tractable subclasses of popular matchings in bipartite graphs; more precisely, we show that it is NP-complete to decide if $G$ admits a popular matching that is neither stable nor dominant. We also show a number of related hardness results, such as (tight) inapproximability of the maximum weight popular matching problem. In non-bipartite graphs, we show a strong negative result: it is NP-hard to decide whether a popular matching exists or not, and the same result holds if we replace popular with dominant. #R##N#On the positive side, we show the following results in any graph: - we identify a subclass of dominant matchings called strongly dominant matchings and show a linear time algorithm to decide if a strongly dominant matching exists or not; - we show an efficient algorithm to compute a popular matching of minimum cost in a graph with edge costs and bounded treewidth.

Includes members:
  Member "max size popular matchings and extensions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "understanding popular matchings via stable matchings")
  Member "popular matching in roommates setting is np hard":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "understanding popular matchings via stable matchings")
  Member "the popular roommates problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "popular edges and dominant matchings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "understanding popular matchings via stable matchings")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)