human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "active deep learning attacks under strict rate limitations for online api calls"):
  Abstract: Machine learning has been applied to a broad range of applications and some of them are available online as application programming interfaces (APIs) with either free (trial) or paid subscriptions. In this paper, we study adversarial machine learning in the form of back-box attacks on online classifier APIs. We start with a deep learning based exploratory (inference) attack, which aims to build a classifier that can provide similar classification results (labels) as the target classifier. To minimize the difference between the labels returned by the inferred classifier and the target classifier, we show that the deep learning based exploratory attack requires a large number of labeled training data samples. These labels can be collected by calling the online API, but usually there is some strict rate limitation on the number of allowed API calls. To mitigate the impact of limited training data, we develop an active learning approach that first builds a classifier based on a small number of API calls and uses this classifier to select samples to further collect their labels. Then, a new classifier is built using more training data samples. This updating process can be repeated multiple times. We show that this active learning approach can build an adversarial classifier with a small statistical difference from the target classifier using only a limited number of training data samples. We further consider evasion and causative (poisoning) attacks based on the inferred classifier that is built by the exploratory attack. Evasion attack determines samples that the target classifier is likely to misclassify, whereas causative attack provides erroneous training data samples to reduce the reliability of the re-trained classifier. The success of these attacks show that adversarial machine learning emerges as a feasible threat in the realistic case with limited training data.

Includes members:
  Member "spectrum data poisoning with adversarial deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "when wireless security meets machine learning motivation challenges and research directions")
  Member "generative adversarial learning for spectrum sensing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "when wireless security meets machine learning motivation challenges and research directions")
  Member "deep learning for launching and mitigating wireless jamming attacks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "when wireless security meets machine learning motivation challenges and research directions")
  Member "stealing machine learning models via prediction apis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "dynamic backdoor attacks against machine learning models")
  Member "adversarial examples in the physical world":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "practical black box attacks against deep learning systems using adversarial examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence")
  Member "the limitations of deep learning in adversarial settings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "evasion attacks against machine learning at test time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)