human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "language gans falling short"):
  Abstract: Generating high-quality text with sufficient diversity is essential for a wide range of Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks. Maximum-Likelihood (MLE) models trained with teacher forcing have constantly been reported as weak baselines, where poor performance is attributed to exposure bias; at inference time, the model is fed its own prediction instead of a ground-truth token, which can lead to accumulating errors and poor samples. This line of reasoning has led to an outbreak of adversarial based approaches for NLG, on the account that GANs do not suffer from exposure bias. In this work, we make several surprising observations with contradict common beliefs. We first revisit the canonical evaluation framework for NLG, and point out fundamental flaws with quality-only evaluation: we show that one can outperform such metrics using a simple, well-known temperature parameter to artificially reduce the entropy of the model's conditional distributions. Second, we leverage the control over the quality / diversity tradeoff given by this parameter to evaluate models over the whole quality-diversity spectrum, and find MLE models constantly outperform the proposed GAN variants, over the whole quality-diversity space. Our results have several implications: 1) The impact of exposure bias on sample quality is less severe than previously thought, 2) temperature tuning provides a better quality / diversity trade off than adversarial training, while being easier to train, easier to cross-validate, and less computationally expensive.

Includes members:
  Member "on accurate evaluation of gans for language generation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bert as a teacher contextual embeddings for sequence level reward")
  Member "eval all trust a few do wrong to none comparing sentence generation models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards generating long and coherent text with multi level latent variable models")
  Member "neural text generation past present and beyond":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "judge the judges a large scale evaluation study of neural language models for online review generation")
  Member "analyzing uncertainty in neural machine translation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "discriminative adversarial search for abstractive summarization")
  Member "adversarial text generation via feature mover s distance":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "learning by semantic similarity makes abstractive summarization better")
  Member "towards diverse text generation with inverse reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "self adversarial learning with comparative discrimination for text generation")
  Member "cot cooperative training for generative modeling of discrete data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "triple to text converting rdf triples into high quality natural languages via optimizing an inverse kl divergence")
  Member "bert pre training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)