human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on the feasibility of fpga acceleration of molecular dynamics simulations"):
  Abstract: Classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are important tools in life and material sciences since they allow studying chemical and biological processes in detail. However, the inherent scalability problem of particle-particle interactions and the sequential dependency of subsequent time steps render MD computationally intensive and difficult to scale. To this end, specialized FPGA-based accelerators have been repeatedly proposed to ameliorate this problem. However, to date none of the leading MD simulation packages fully support FPGA acceleration and a direct comparison of GPU versus FPGA accelerated codes has remained elusive so far. With this report, we aim at clarifying this issue by comparing measured application performance on GPU-dense compute nodes with performance and cost estimates of a FPGA-based single- node system. Our results show that an FPGA-based system can indeed outperform a similarly configured GPU-based system, but the overall application-level speedup remains in the order of 2x due to software overheads on the host. Considering the price for GPU and FPGA solutions, we observe that GPU-based solutions provide the better cost/performance tradeoff, and hence pure FPGA-based solutions are likely not going to be commercially viable. However, we also note that scaled multi-node systems could potentially benefit from a hybrid composition, where GPUs are used for compute intensive parts and FPGAs for latency and communication sensitive tasks.

Includes members:
  Member "a scalable near memory architecture for training deep neural networks on large in memory datasets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "eden enabling energy efficient high performance deep neural network inference using approximate dram")
  Member "best bang for your buck gpu nodes for gromacs biomolecular simulations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "optimizing airebo navigating the journey from complex legacy code to high performance")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)