human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deconstructing the blockchain to approach physical limits"):
  Abstract: Transaction throughput, confirmation latency and confirmation reliability are fundamental performance measures of any blockchain system in addition to its security. In a decentralized setting, these measures are limited by two underlying physical network attributes: communication capacity and speed-of-light propagation delay. Existing systems operate far away from these physical limits. In this work we introduce Prism, a new proof-of-work blockchain protocol, which can achieve 1) security against up to 50% adversarial hashing power; 2) optimal throughput up to the capacity C of the network; 3) confirmation latency for honest transactions proportional to the propagation delay D, with confirmation error probability exponentially small in CD ; 4) eventual total ordering of all transactions. Our approach to the design of this protocol is based on deconstructing the blockchain into its basic functionalities and systematically scaling up these functionalities to approach their physical limits.

Includes members:
  Member "scaling nakamoto consensus to thousands of transactions per second":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "surface a practical blockchain consensus algorithm for real world networks")
  Member "the balance attack against proof of work blockchains the r3 testbed as an example":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "continuous time analysis of the bitcoin and prism backbone protocols")
  Member "enhancing bitcoin security and performance with strong consistency via collective signing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "surface a practical blockchain consensus algorithm for real world networks")
  Member "solida a blockchain protocol based on reconfigurable byzantine consensus":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "on the feasibility of sybil attacks in shard based permissionless blockchains")
  Member "bitcoin meets strong consistency":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on the feasibility of sybil attacks in shard based permissionless blockchains")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)