human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "model agnostic private learning via stability"):
  Abstract: We design differentially private learning algorithms that are agnostic to the learning model. Our algorithms are interactive in nature, i.e., instead of outputting a model based on the training data, they provide predictions for a set of $m$ feature vectors that arrive online. We show that, for the feature vectors on which an ensemble of models (trained on random disjoint subsets of a dataset) makes consistent predictions, there is almost no-cost of privacy in generating accurate predictions for those feature vectors. To that end, we provide a novel coupling of the distance to instability framework with the sparse vector technique. We provide algorithms with formal privacy and utility guarantees for both binary/multi-class classification, and soft-label classification. For binary classification in the standard (agnostic) PAC model, we show how to bootstrap from our privately generated predictions to construct a computationally efficient private learner that outputs a final accurate hypothesis. Our construction - to the best of our knowledge - is the first computationally efficient construction for a label-private learner. We prove sample complexity upper bounds for this setting. As in non-private sample complexity bounds, the only relevant property of the given concept class is its VC dimension. For soft-label classification, our techniques are based on exploiting the stability properties of traditional learning algorithms, like stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We provide a new technique to boost the average-case stability properties of learning algorithms to strong (worst-case) stability properties, and then exploit them to obtain private classification algorithms. In the process, we also show that a large class of SGD methods satisfy average-case stability properties, in contrast to a smaller class of SGD methods that are uniformly stable as shown in prior work.

Includes members:
  Member "learning privately from multiparty data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "differentially private deep learning with smooth sensitivity")
  Member "bolt on differential privacy for scalable stochastic gradient descent based analytics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "guidelines for implementing and auditing differentially private systems")
  Member "differentially private release and learning of threshold functions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "privately learning markov random fields")
  Member "train faster generalize better stability of stochastic gradient descent":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "disentangling adaptive gradient methods from learning rates")
  Member "private learning and sanitization pure vs approximate differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "an equivalence between private classification and online prediction")
  Member "interactive fingerprinting codes and the hardness of preventing false discovery":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "a learning theory approach to non interactive database privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)