human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "evaluation of community structures using kappa index and f score instead of normalized mutual information"):
  Abstract: Community structures are critical towards understanding not only the network topology but also how the network functions. However, how to evaluate the quality of detected community structures is still challenging and remains unsolved. The most widely used metric, normalized mutual information (NMI), was proved to have finite size effect, and its improved form rNMI has reverse finite size effect. cNMI is thus proposed and has neither finite size effect nor reverse finite size effect. However, in this paper we show that cNMI violates the so-called proportionality assumption. In addition, NMI-type metrics have the problem of ignoring importance of small communities. Finally, they cannot be used to evaluate a single community of interest. In this paper, we map the computed community labels to the ground-truth ones through integer linear programming, then use Kappa index and F-score to evaluate the detected community structures. Experimental results demonstrate the rationality of our method.

Includes members:
  Member "a new metric for quality of network community structure":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a new measure of modularity density for community detection")
  Member "defining and evaluating network communities based on ground truth":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "certified robustness of community detection against adversarial structural perturbation via randomized smoothing")
  Member "bad communities with high modularity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a statistical density based analysis of graph clustering algorithm performance")
  Member "objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "interpretable and fair comparison of link prediction or entity alignment methods with adjusted mean rank")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)