human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "spanning tree congestion and computation of generalized gy h o ri lov a sz partition"):
  Abstract: We study a natural problem in graph sparsification, the Spanning Tree Congestion (\STC) problem. Informally, the \STC problem seeks a spanning tree with no tree-edge \emph{routing} too many of the original edges. The root of this problem dates back to at least 30 years ago, motivated by applications in network design, parallel computing and circuit design. Variants of the problem have also seen algorithmic applications as a preprocessing step of several important graph algorithms. #R##N#For any general connected graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, we show that its STC is at most $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{mn})$, which is asymptotically optimal since we also demonstrate graphs with STC at least $\Omega(\sqrt{mn})$. We present a polynomial-time algorithm which computes a spanning tree with congestion $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{mn}\cdot \log n)$. We also present another algorithm for computing a spanning tree with congestion $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{mn})$; this algorithm runs in sub-exponential time when $m = \omega(n \log^2 n)$. #R##N#For achieving the above results, an important intermediate theorem is \emph{generalized Gy\H{o}ri-Lov{\'{a}}sz theorem}, for which Chen et al. gave a non-constructive proof. We give the first elementary and constructive proof by providing a local search algorithm with running time $\mathcal{O}^*\left( 4^n \right)$, which is a key ingredient of the above-mentioned sub-exponential time algorithm. We discuss a few consequences of the theorem concerning graph partitioning, which might be of independent interest. #R##N#We also show that for any graph which satisfies certain \emph{expanding properties}, its STC is at most $\mathcal{O}(n)$, and a corresponding spanning tree can be computed in polynomial time. We then use this to show that a random graph has STC $\Theta(n)$ with high probability.

Includes members:
  Member "nearly tight low stretch spanning trees":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "2 node connectivity network design")
  Member "tight bounds for the min max boundary decomposition cost of weighted graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)