human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "too far to see not really pedestrian detection with scale aware localization policy"):
  Abstract: A major bottleneck of pedestrian detection lies on the sharp performance deterioration in the presence of small-size pedestrians that are relatively far from the camera. Motivated by the observation that pedestrians of disparate spatial scales exhibit distinct visual appearances, we propose in this paper an active pedestrian detector that explicitly operates over multiple-layer neuronal representations of the input still image. More specifically, convolutional neural nets, such as ResNet and faster R-CNNs, are exploited to provide a rich and discriminative hierarchy of feature representations, as well as initial pedestrian proposals. Here each pedestrian observation of distinct size could be best characterized in terms of the ResNet feature representation at a certain layer of the hierarchy. Meanwhile, initial pedestrian proposals are attained by the faster R-CNNs techniques, i.e., region proposal network and follow-up region of interesting pooling layer employed right after the specific ResNet convolutional layer of interest, to produce joint predictions on the bounding-box proposals' locations and categories (i.e., pedestrian or not). This is engaged as an input to our active detector, where for each initial pedestrian proposal, a sequence of coordinate transformation actions is carried out to determine its proper x-y 2D location and the layer of feature representation, or eventually terminated as being background. Empirically our approach is demonstrated to produce overall lower detection errors on widely used benchmarks, and it works particularly well with far-scale pedestrians. For example, compared with 60.51% log-average miss rate of the state-of-the-art MS-CNN for far-scale pedestrians (those below 80 pixels in bounding-box height) of the Caltech benchmark, the miss rate of our approach is 41.85%, with a notable reduction of 18.66%.

Includes members:
  Member "tree structured reinforcement learning for sequential object localization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "pixelrl fully convolutional network with reinforcement learning for image processing")
  Member "pedestrian detection inspired by appearance constancy and shape symmetry":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "synthtext3d synthesizing scene text images from 3d virtual worlds")
  Member "how far are we from solving pedestrian detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "pedestrian detection the elephant in the room")
  Member "a unified multi scale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "ha ccn hierarchical attention based crowd counting network")
  Member "is faster r cnn doing well for pedestrian detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "psc net learning part spatial co occurence for occluded pedestrian detection")
  Member "ssd single shot multibox detector":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "scale aware fast r cnn for pedestrian detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "psc net learning part spatial co occurence for occluded pedestrian detection")
  Member "filtered channel features for pedestrian detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "adapted center and scale prediction more stable and more accurate")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)