human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "vuldeepecker a deep learning based system for vulnerability detection"):
  Abstract: The automatic detection of software vulnerabilities is an important research problem. However, existing solutions to this problem rely on human experts to define features and often miss many vulnerabilities (i.e., incurring high false negative rate). In this paper, we initiate the study of using deep learning-based vulnerability detection to relieve human experts from the tedious and subjective task of manually defining features. Since deep learning is motivated to deal with problems that are very different from the problem of vulnerability detection, we need some guiding principles for applying deep learning to vulnerability detection. In particular, we need to find representations of software programs that are suitable for deep learning. For this purpose, we propose using code gadgets to represent programs and then transform them into vectors, where a code gadget is a number of (not necessarily consecutive) lines of code that are semantically related to each other. This leads to the design and implementation of a deep learning-based vulnerability detection system, called Vulnerability Deep Pecker (VulDeePecker). In order to evaluate VulDeePecker, we present the first vulnerability dataset for deep learning approaches. Experimental results show that VulDeePecker can achieve much fewer false negatives (with reasonable false positives) than other approaches. We further apply VulDeePecker to 3 software products (namely Xen, Seamonkey, and Libav) and detect 4 vulnerabilities, which are not reported in the National Vulnerability Database but were "silently" patched by the vendors when releasing later versions of these products; in contrast, these vulnerabilities are almost entirely missed by the other vulnerability detection systems we experimented with.

Includes members:
  Member "expose a character level convolutional neural network with embeddings for detecting malicious urls file paths and registry keys":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "nested multiple instance learning in modelling of http network traffic")
  Member "sourcerercc scaling code clone detection to big code":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a study of potential code borrowing and license violations in java projects on github")
  Member "lattice based recurrent neural network encoders for neural machine translation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "lattice based transformer encoder for neural machine translation")
  Member "deep api learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "big code big vocabulary open vocabulary models for source code")
  Member "adam a method for stochastic optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "on the properties of neural machine translation encoder decoder approaches":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "show and tell a neural image caption generator":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "relationship embedded representation learning for grounding referring expressions")
  Member "building program vector representations for deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "modeling programs hierarchically with stack augmented lstm")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)