human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "auto context r cnn"):
  Abstract: Region-based convolutional neural networks (R-CNN)~\cite{fast_rcnn,faster_rcnn,mask_rcnn} have largely dominated object detection. Operators defined on RoIs (Region of Interests) play an important role in R-CNNs such as RoIPooling~\cite{fast_rcnn} and RoIAlign~\cite{mask_rcnn}. They all only utilize information inside RoIs for RoI prediction, even with their recent deformable extensions~\cite{deformable_cnn}. Although surrounding context is well-known for its importance in object detection, it has yet been integrated in R-CNNs in a flexible and effective way. Inspired by the auto-context work~\cite{auto_context} and the multi-class object layout work~\cite{nms_context}, this paper presents a generic context-mining RoI operator (i.e., \textit{RoICtxMining}) seamlessly integrated in R-CNNs, and the resulting object detection system is termed \textbf{Auto-Context R-CNN} which is trained end-to-end. The proposed RoICtxMining operator is a simple yet effective two-layer extension of the RoIPooling or RoIAlign operator. Centered at an object-RoI, it creates a $3\times 3$ layout to mine contextual information adaptively in the $8$ surrounding context regions on-the-fly. Within each of the $8$ context regions, a context-RoI is mined in term of discriminative power and its RoIPooling / RoIAlign features are concatenated with the object-RoI for final prediction. \textit{The proposed Auto-Context R-CNN is robust to occlusion and small objects, and shows promising vulnerability for adversarial attacks without being adversarially-trained.} In experiments, it is evaluated using RoIPooling as the backbone and shows competitive results on Pascal VOC, Microsoft COCO, and KITTI datasets (including $6.9\%$ mAP improvements over the R-FCN~\cite{rfcn} method on COCO \textit{test-dev} dataset and the first place on both KITTI pedestrian and cyclist detection as of this submission).

Includes members:
  Member "adversarial patch":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sentinet detecting localized universal attacks against deep learning systems")
  Member "auto context convolutional neural network auto net for brain extraction in magnetic resonance imaging":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "abdominal multi organ segmentation with cascaded convolutional and adversarial deep networks")
  Member "non local neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning enriched features for real image restoration and enhancement")
  Member "deformable convolutional networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "megdet a large mini batch object detector":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "harmonizing transferability and discriminability for adapting object detectors")
  Member "adversarial examples for semantic segmentation and object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "category wise attack transferable adversarial examples for anchor free object detection")
  Member "adversarial examples that fool detectors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "lower bounds on adversarial robustness from optimal transport")
  Member "accurate single stage detector using recurrent rolling convolution":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "relationship embedded representation learning for grounding referring expressions")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)