human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the asymmetric traveling salesman path lp has constant integrality ratio"):
  Abstract: We show that the classical LP relaxation of the asymmetric traveling salesman path problem (ATSPP) has constant integrality ratio. If $\rho_{\text{ATSP}}$ and $\rho_{\text{ATSPP}}$ denote the integrality ratios for the asymmetric TSP and its path version, then $\rho_{\text{ATSPP}}\le 4\rho_{\text{ATSP}}-3$. #R##N#We prove an even better bound for node-weighted instances: if the integrality ratio for ATSP on node-weighted instances is $\rho_{\text{ATSP}}^{\text{NW}}$, then the integrality ratio for ATSPP on node-weighted instances is at most $2\rho_{\text{ATSP}}^{\text NW}-1$. #R##N#Moreover, we show that for ATSP node-weighted instances and unweighted digraph instances are almost equivalent. From this we deduce a lower bound of 2 on the integrality ratio of unweighted digraph instances.

Includes members:
  Member "a constant factor approximation algorithm for the asymmetric traveling salesman problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a constant factor approximation for directed latency in quasi polynomial time")
  Member "approximating atsp by relaxing connectivity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "an improved approximation algorithm for atsp")
  Member "an improved integrality gap for asymmetric tsp paths":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a constant factor approximation for directed latency in quasi polynomial time")
  Member "asymmetric traveling salesman path and directed latency problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a constant factor approximation for directed latency in quasi polynomial time")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)