human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "tight bounds on the round complexity of the distributed maximum coverage problem"):
  Abstract: We study the maximum $k$-set coverage problem in the following distributed setting. A collection of sets $S_1,\ldots,S_m$ over a universe $[n]$ is partitioned across $p$ machines and the goal is to find $k$ sets whose union covers the most number of elements. The computation proceeds in synchronous rounds. In each round, all machines simultaneously send a message to a central coordinator who then communicates back to all machines a summary to guide the computation for the next round. At the end, the coordinator outputs the answer. The main measures of efficiency in this setting are the approximation ratio of the returned solution, the communication cost of each machine, and the number of rounds of computation. #R##N#Our main result is an asymptotically tight bound on the tradeoff between these measures for the distributed maximum coverage problem. We first show that any $r$-round protocol for this problem either incurs a communication cost of $ k \cdot m^{\Omega(1/r)}$ or only achieves an approximation factor of $k^{\Omega(1/r)}$. This implies that any protocol that simultaneously achieves good approximation ratio ($O(1)$ approximation) and good communication cost ($\widetilde{O}(n)$ communication per machine), essentially requires logarithmic (in $k$) number of rounds. We complement our lower bound result by showing that there exist an $r$-round protocol that achieves an $\frac{e}{e-1}$-approximation (essentially best possible) with a communication cost of $k \cdot m^{O(1/r)}$ as well as an $r$-round protocol that achieves a $k^{O(1/r)}$-approximation with only $\widetilde{O}(n)$ communication per each machine (essentially best possible). #R##N#We further use our results in this distributed setting to obtain new bounds for the maximum coverage problem in two other main models of computation for massive datasets, namely, the dynamic streaming model and the MapReduce model.

Includes members:
  Member "distributed partial clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "fast noise removal for k means clustering")
  Member "tight space approximation tradeoff for the multi pass streaming set cover problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "two player hidden pointer chasing and multi pass lower bounds in turnstile streams")
  Member "on estimating maximum matching size in graph streams":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "two player hidden pointer chasing and multi pass lower bounds in turnstile streams")
  Member "combinatorial auctions do need modest interaction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "polynomial pass lower bounds for graph streaming algorithms")
  Member "submodular optimization over sliding windows":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "bring your own greedy max near optimal 1 2 approximations for submodular knapsack")
  Member "distributed coverage maximization via sketching":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "metric sublinear algorithms via linear sampling")
  Member "almost optimal streaming algorithms for coverage problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "approximability of monotone submodular function maximization under cardinality and matroid constraints in the streaming model")
  Member "better streaming algorithms for the maximum coverage problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "approximability of monotone submodular function maximization under cardinality and matroid constraints in the streaming model")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)