human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "netscore towards universal metrics for large scale performance analysis of deep neural networks for practical on device edge usage"):
  Abstract: Much of the focus in the design of deep neural networks has been on improving accuracy, leading to more powerful yet highly complex network architectures that are difficult to deploy in practical scenarios, particularly on edge devices such as mobile and other consumer devices given their high computational and memory requirements. As a result, there has been a recent interest in the design of quantitative metrics for evaluating deep neural networks that accounts for more than just model accuracy as the sole indicator of network performance. In this study, we continue the conversation towards universal metrics for evaluating the performance of deep neural networks for practical on-device edge usage. In particular, we propose a new balanced metric called NetScore, which is designed specifically to provide a quantitative assessment of the balance between accuracy, computational complexity, and network architecture complexity of a deep neural network, which is important for on-device edge operation. In what is one of the largest comparative analysis between deep neural networks in literature, the NetScore metric, the top-1 accuracy metric, and the popular information density metric were compared across a diverse set of 60 different deep convolutional neural networks for image classification on the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC 2012) dataset. The evaluation results across these three metrics for this diverse set of networks are presented in this study to act as a reference guide for practitioners in the field. The proposed NetScore metric, along with the other tested metrics, are by no means perfect, but the hope is to push the conversation towards better universal metrics for evaluating deep neural networks for use in practical on-device edge scenarios to help guide practitioners in model design for such scenarios.

Includes members:
  Member "mobilenetv2 inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "regularized evolution for image classifier architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "searching for winograd aware quantized networks")
  Member "munet a highly compact deep convolutional neural network architecture for real time embedded traffic sign classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "total recall understanding traffic signs using deep hierarchical convolutional neural networks")
  Member "tiny ssd a tiny single shot detection deep convolutional neural network for real time embedded object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "refinedetlite a lightweight one stage object detection framework for cpu only devices")
  Member "squeezenext hardware aware neural network design":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "zeroq a novel zero shot quantization framework")
  Member "shufflenet an extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "post training piecewise linear quantization for deep neural networks")
  Member "progressive neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "gan compression efficient architectures for interactive conditional gans")
  Member "an analysis of deep neural network models for practical applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "crl class representative learning for image classification")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)