human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "robustness to out of distribution inputs via task aware generative uncertainty"):
  Abstract: Deep learning provides a powerful tool for machine perception when the observations resemble the training data. However, real-world robotic systems must react intelligently to their observations even in unexpected circumstances. This requires a system to reason about its own uncertainty given unfamiliar, out-of-distribution observations. Approximate Bayesian approaches are commonly used to estimate uncertainty for neural network predictions, but can struggle with out-of-distribution observations. Generative models can in principle detect out-of-distribution observations as those with a low estimated density. However, the mere presence of an out-of-distribution input does not by itself indicate an unsafe situation. In this paper, we present a method for uncertainty-aware robotic perception that combines generative modeling and model uncertainty to cope with uncertainty stemming from out-of-distribution states. Our method estimates an uncertainty measure about the model's prediction, taking into account an explicit (generative) model of the observation distribution to handle out-of-distribution inputs. This is accomplished by probabilistically projecting observations onto the training distribution, such that out-of-distribution inputs map to uncertain in-distribution observations, which in turn produce uncertain task-related predictions, but only if task-relevant parts of the image change. We evaluate our method on an action-conditioned collision prediction task with both simulated and real data, and demonstrate that our method of projecting out-of-distribution observations improves the performance of four standard Bayesian and non-Bayesian neural network approaches, offering more favorable trade-offs between the proportion of time a robot can remain autonomous and the proportion of impending crashes successfully avoided.

Includes members:
  Member "vr goggles for robots real to sim domain adaptation for visual control":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "divis domain invariant visual servoing for collision free goal reaching")
  Member "gibson env real world perception for embodied agents":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "an exploration of embodied visual exploration")
  Member "unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "compact surjective encoding autoencoder for unsupervised novelty detection")
  Member "self supervised deep reinforcement learning with generalized computation graphs for robot navigation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "mvp unified motion and visual self supervised learning for large scale robotic navigation")
  Member "cycada cycle consistent adversarial domain adaptation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a novel framework for selection of gans for an application")
  Member "uncertainty aware reinforcement learning for collision avoidance":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "planet of the bayesians reconsidering and improving deep planning network by incorporating bayesian inference")
  Member "deep exploration via bootstrapped dqn":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "ride rewarding impact driven exploration for procedurally generated environments")
  Member "deep variational information bottleneck":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "intelligence physics and information the tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity in machine learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)