human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "noisy subspace clustering via matching pursuits"):
  Abstract: Sparsity-based subspace clustering algorithms have attracted significant attention thanks to their excellent performance in practical applications. A prominent example is the sparse subspace clustering (SSC) algorithm by Elhamifar and Vidal, which performs spectral clustering based on an adjacency matrix obtained by sparsely representing each data point in terms of all the other data points via the Lasso. When the number of data points is large or the dimension of the ambient space is high, the computational complexity of SSC quickly becomes prohibitive. Dyer  et al.  observed that SSC-orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) obtained by replacing the Lasso by the greedy OMP algorithm results in significantly lower computational complexity, while often yielding comparable performance. The central goal of this paper is an analytical performance characterization of SSC-OMP for noisy data. Moreover, we introduce and analyze the SSC-matching pursuit (MP) algorithm, which employs MP in lieu of OMP. Both SSC-OMP and SSC-MP are proven to succeed even when the subspaces intersect and when the data points are contaminated by severe noise. The clustering conditions we obtain for SSC-OMP and SSC-MP are similar to those for SSC and for the thresholding-based subspace clustering (TSC) algorithm due to Heckel and Bolcskei. Analytical results in combination with numerical results indicate that both SSC-OMP and SSC-MP with a data-dependent stopping criterion automatically detect the dimensions of the subspaces underlying the data. Experiments on synthetic and on real data show that SSC-MP often matches or exceeds the performance of the computationally more expensive SSC-OMP algorithm. Moreover, SSC-MP compares very favorably to SSC, TSC, and the nearest subspace neighbor algorithm, both in terms of clustering performance and running time. In addition, we find that, in contrast to SSC-OMP, the performance of SSC-MP is very robust with respect to the choice of parameters in the stopping criteria.

Includes members:
  Member "scalable sparse subspace clustering by orthogonal matching pursuit":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "multi level representation learning for deep subspace clustering")
  Member "robust subspace clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "provably efficient exploration for rl with unsupervised learning")
  Member "greedy feature selection for subspace clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "multi level representation learning for deep subspace clustering")
  Member "sparse subspace clustering algorithm theory and applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "provably efficient exploration for rl with unsupervised learning")
  Member "a geometric analysis of subspace clustering with outliers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "arae adversarially robust training of autoencoders improves novelty detection")
  Member "orthogonal matching pursuit with replacement":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "sketching for large scale learning of mixture models")
  Member "a tutorial on spectral clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "approximating spectral clustering via sampling a review")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)