human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "can you explain that better comprehensible text analytics for se applications"):
  Abstract: Text mining methods are used for a wide range of Software Engineering (SE) tasks. The biggest challenge of text mining is high dimensional data, i.e., a corpus of documents can contain $10^4$ to $10^6$ unique words. To address this complexity, some very convoluted text mining methods have been applied. Is that complexity necessary? Are there simpler ways to quickly generate models that perform as well as the more convoluted methods and also be human-readable? #R##N#To answer these questions, we explore a combination of LDA (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) and FFTs (Fast and Frugal Trees) to classify NASA software bug reports from six different projects. Designed using principles from psychological science, FFTs return very small models that are human-comprehensible. When compared to the commonly used text mining method and a recent state-of-the-art-system (search-based SE method that automatically tune the control parameters of LDA), these FFT models are very small (a binary tree of depth $d = 4$ that references only 4 topics) and hence easy to understand. They were also faster to generate and produced similar or better severity predictions. #R##N#Hence we can conclude that, at least for datasets explored here, convoluted text mining models can be deprecated in favor of simpler method such as LDA+FFTs. At the very least, we recommend LDA+FFTs (a) when humans need to read, understand, and audit a model or (b) as an initial baseline method for the SE researchers exploring text artifacts from software projects.

Includes members:
  Member "applications of psychological science for actionable analytics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "how to improve ai tools by adding in se knowledge experiments with the timelime defect reduction tool")
  Member "what is wrong with topic modeling and how to fix it using search based software engineering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "argulens anatomy of community opinions on usability issues using argumentation models")
  Member "500 times faster than deep learning a case study exploring faster methods for text mining stackoverflow":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "puminer mining security posts from developer question and answer websites with pu learning")
  Member "explainable software analytics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "explainability in human agent systems")
  Member "building better quality predictors using epsilon dominance":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "better software analytics via duo data mining algorithms using used by optimizers")
  Member "we don t need another hero the impact of heroes on software development":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the changing nature of computational science software")
  Member "replicating and scaling up qualitative analysis using crowdsourcing a github based case study":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "conflict and cooperation ai research and development in terms of the economy of conventions")
  Member "the mythos of model interpretability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)