human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "handling adversarial concept drift in streaming data"):
  Abstract: Abstract   Classifiers operating in a dynamic, real world environment, are vulnerable to adversarial activity, which causes the data distribution to change over time. These changes are traditionally referred to as concept drift, and several approaches have been developed in literature to deal with the problem of drift detection and handling. However, most concept drift handling techniques approach it as a domain independent task, to make them applicable to a wide gamut of reactive systems. These techniques are developed from an adversarial agnostic perspective, where they naively assume that adversarial activity is like any other change to the data, which can be fixed by retraining the models. However, this is not the case when a malicious agent is trying to evade the deployed classification system. In such an environment, the properties of concept drift are unique, as the drift is intended to degrade the system and at the same time designed to avoid detection by traditional concept drift detection techniques. This special category of drift is termed as adversarial drift, and this paper analyzes its characteristics and impact in a streaming environment. A novel framework for dealing with adversarial concept drift is proposed, called the Predict-Detect streaming framework. This framework uses adversarial forethought and incorporates the context of classification into the drift detection task, to provide leverage in dynamic-adversarial domains. Experimental evaluation of the framework, on generated adversarial drifting data streams, demonstrates that this framework is able to provide early and reliable unsupervised indication of drift, and is able to recover from drifts swiftly. While traditional drift detectors can be evaded by intelligent adversaries, the proposed framework is especially designed to capture adversaries by misdirecting them into revealing themselves. In addition, the framework is designed to work on imbalanced and sparsely labeled data streams, as a limited-memory, incremental algorithm. The generic design and domain independent nature of the framework makes it applicable as a blueprint for developers wanting to implement reactive security to their classification based systems.

Includes members:
  Member "sok security and privacy in machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "security theater on the vulnerability of classifiers to exploratory attacks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "fraternal twins unifying attacks on machine learning and digital watermarking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a framework for the extraction of deep neural networks by leveraging public data")
  Member "security evaluation of pattern classifiers under attack":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fault sneaking attack a stealthy framework for misleading deep neural networks")
  Member "transferability in machine learning from phenomena to black box attacks using adversarial samples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "stealing machine learning models via prediction apis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "dynamic backdoor attacks against machine learning models")
  Member "evasion attacks against machine learning at test time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "scikit learn machine learning in python":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "scail classifier weights scaling for class incremental learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)