human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "attenuate locally win globally an attenuation based framework for online stochastic matching with timeouts"):
  Abstract: Online matching problems have garnered significant attention in recent years due to numerous applications in e-commerce, online advertisements, ride-sharing, etc. Many of them capture the uncertainty in the real world by including stochasticity in both the arrival process and the matching process. The Online Stochastic Matching with Timeouts problem introduced by Bansal, et al., (Algorithmica, 2012) models matching markets (e.g., E-Bay, Amazon). Buyers arrive from an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) known distribution on buyer profiles and can be shown a list of items one at a time. Each buyer has some probability of purchasing each item and a limit (timeout) on the number of items they can be shown. #R##N#Bansal et al., (Algorithmica, 2012) gave a 0.12-competitive algorithm which was improved by Adamczyk, et al., (ESA, 2015) to 0.24. We present an online attenuation framework that uses an algorithm for offline stochastic matching as a black box. On the upper bound side, we show that this framework, combined with a black-box adapted from Bansal et al., (Algorithmica, 2012), yields an online algorithm which nearly doubles the ratio to 0.46. On the lower bound side, we show that no algorithm can achieve a ratio better than 0.632 using the standard LP for this problem. This framework has a high potential for further improvements since new algorithms for offline stochastic matching can directly improve the ratio for the online problem. #R##N#Our online framework also has the potential for a variety of extensions. For example, we introduce a natural generalization: Online Stochastic Matching with Two-sided Timeouts in which both online and offline vertices have timeouts. Our framework provides the first algorithm for this problem achieving a ratio of 0.30. We once again use the algorithm of Adamczyk et al., (ESA, 2015) as a black-box and plug-it into our framework.

Includes members:
  Member "near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "online stochastic max weight matching prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models")
  Member "new algorithms better bounds and a novel model for online stochastic matching":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "online graph matching problems with a worst case reassignment budget")
  Member "improved approximation algorithms for stochastic matching":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the markovian price of information")
  Member "fast algorithms for online stochastic convex programming":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "simple and fast algorithm for binary integer and online linear programming")
  Member "a stochastic probing problem with applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "learning optimal search algorithms from data")
  Member "when lp is the cure for your matching woes improved bounds for stochastic matchings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "predict and match prophet inequalities with uncertain supply")
  Member "online stochastic matching online actions based on offline statistics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "online graph matching problems with a worst case reassignment budget")
  Member "online stochastic packing applied to display ad allocation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)