human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a new target specific object proposal generation method for visual tracking"):
  Abstract: Object proposal generation methods have been widely applied to many computer vision tasks. However, existing object proposal generation methods often suffer from the problems of motion blur, low contrast, deformation, etc., when they are applied to video related tasks. In this paper, we propose an effective and highly accurate target-specific object proposal generation (TOPG) method, which takes full advantage of the context information of a video to alleviate these problems. Specifically, we propose to generate target-specific object proposals by integrating the information of two important objectness cues: colors and edges, which are complementary to each other for different challenging environments in the process of generating object proposals. As a result, the recall of the proposed TOPG method is significantly increased. Furthermore, we propose an object proposal ranking strategy to increase the rank accuracy of the generated object proposals. The proposed TOPG method has yielded significant recall gain (about 20%-60% higher) compared with several state-of-the-art object proposal methods on several challenging visual tracking datasets. Then, we apply the proposed TOPG method to the task of visual tracking and propose a TOPG-based tracker (called as TOPGT), where TOPG is used as a sample selection strategy to select a small number of high-quality target candidates from the generated object proposals. Since the object proposals generated by the proposed TOPG cover many hard negative samples and positive samples, these object proposals can not only be used for training an effective classifier, but also be used as target candidates for visual tracking. Experimental results show the superior performance of TOPGT for visual tracking compared with several other state-of-the-art visual trackers (about 3%-11% higher than the winner of the VOT2015 challenge in term of distance precision).

Includes members:
  Member "object discovery via cohesion measurement":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a fast face detection method via convolutional neural network")
  Member "sanet structure aware network for visual tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "object adaptive lstm network for real time visual tracking with adversarial data augmentation")
  Member "hypernet towards accurate region proposal generation and joint object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "learning multi domain convolutional neural networks for visual tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "siamese attentional keypoint network for high performance visual tracking")
  Member "faster r cnn towards real time object detection with region proposal networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "return of the devil in the details delving deep into convolutional nets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a survey on deep hashing methods")
  Member "object proposal generation using two stage cascade svms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "object proposal with kernelized partial ranking")
  Member "fast edge detection using structured forests":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "saliency enhancement using gradient domain edges merging")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)