human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a simple and efficient strategy for the coin weighing problem with a spring scale"):
  Abstract: This paper considers a generalized version of the coin weighing problem with a spring scale that lies at the intersection of group testing and compressed sensing problems. Given a collection of $n\geq 2$ coins of total weight $d$ (for a known integer $d$), where the weight of each coin is an unknown integer in the range of $\{0,1,\dots,k\}$ (for a known integer $k\geq 1$), the problem is to determine the weight of each coin by weighing subsets of coins in a spring scale. The goal is to minimize the average number of weighings over all possible weight configurations. For $d=k=1$, an adaptive bisecting weighing strategy is known to be optimal. However, even the case of $d=k=2$, which is the simplest non-trivial case of the problem, is still open. For this case, we propose and analyze a simple and effective adaptive weighing strategy. A numerical evaluation of the exact recursive formulas, derived for the analysis of the proposed strategy, shows that this strategy requires about ${1.365\log_2 n -0.5}$ weighings on average. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first non-trivial achievable upper bound on the minimum expected required number of weighings for the case of $d=k=2$. As $n$ grows unbounded, the proposed strategy, when compared to an optimal strategy within the commonly-used class of nested strategies, requires about $31.75\%$ less number of weighings on average; and in comparison with the information-theoretic lower bound, it requires at most about $8.16\%$ extra number of weighings on average.

Includes members:
  Member "optimal nested test plan for combinatorial quantitative group testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "group testing an information theory perspective")
  Member "semiquantitative group testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "group testing with runlength constraints for topological molecular storage")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)