human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables"):
  Abstract: Hip fractures are a leading cause of death and disability among older adults. Hip fractures are also the most commonly missed diagnosis on pelvic radiographs. Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) algorithms have shown promise for helping radiologists detect fractures, but the image features underpinning their predictions are notoriously difficult to understand. In this study, we trained deep learning models on 17,587 radiographs to classify fracture, five patient traits, and 14 hospital process variables. All 20 variables could be predicted from a radiograph (p < 0.05), with the best performances on scanner model (AUC=1.00), scanner brand (AUC=0.98), and whether the order was marked "priority" (AUC=0.79). Fracture was predicted moderately well from the image (AUC=0.78) and better when combining image features with patient data (AUC=0.86, p=2e-9) or patient data plus hospital process features (AUC=0.91, p=1e-21). The model performance on a test set with matched patient variables was significantly lower than a random test set (AUC=0.67, p=0.003); and when the test set was matched on patient and image acquisition variables, the model performed randomly (AUC=0.52, 95% CI 0.46-0.58), indicating that these variables were the main source of the model's predictive ability overall. We also used Naive Bayes to combine evidence from image models with patient and hospital data and found their inclusion improved performance, but that this approach was nevertheless inferior to directly modeling all variables. If CAD algorithms are inexplicably leveraging patient and process variables in their predictions, it is unclear how radiologists should interpret their predictions in the context of other known patient data. Further research is needed to illuminate deep learning decision processes so that computers and clinicians can effectively cooperate.

Includes members:
  Member "predicting cardiovascular risk factors in retinal fundus photographs using deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "refuge challenge a unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs")
  Member "learning to diagnose from scratch by exploiting dependencies among labels":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "dynamic graph correlation learning for disease diagnosis with incomplete labels")
  Member "variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs a cross sectional study":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "right for the wrong scientific reasons revising deep networks by interacting with their explanations")
  Member "chexnet radiologist level pneumonia detection on chest x rays with deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "an interpretable classifier for high resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization")
  Member "abnormality detection and localization in chest x rays using deep convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "finding interesting frames in deep video analytics a top k approach")
  Member "fast and accurate classification of echocardiograms using deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "pznet efficient 3d convnet inference on manycore cpus")
  Member "gender from iris or gender from mascara":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "demographic bias in biometrics a survey on an emerging challenge")
  Member "semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human like biases":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "think locally act globally federated learning with local and global representations")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)