human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a dataset of laryngeal endoscopic images with comparative study on convolution neural network based semantic segmentation"):
  Abstract: Purpose Automated segmentation of anatomical structures in medical image analysis is a prerequisite for autonomous diagnosis as well as various computer and robot aided interventions. Recent methods based on deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) have outperformed former heuristic methods. However, those methods were primarily evaluated on rigid, real-world environments. In this study, existing segmentation methods were evaluated for their use on a new dataset of transoral endoscopic exploration. Methods Four machine learning based methods SegNet, UNet, ENet and ErfNet were trained with supervision on a novel 7-class dataset of the human larynx. The dataset contains 536 manually segmented images from two patients during laser incisions. The Intersection-over-Union (IoU) evaluation metric was used to measure the accuracy of each method. Data augmentation and network ensembling were employed to increase segmentation accuracy. Stochastic inference was used to show uncertainties of the individual models. Patient-to-patient transfer was investigated using patient-specific fine-tuning. Results In this study, a weighted average ensemble network of UNet and ErfNet was best suited for the segmentation of laryngeal soft tissue with a mean IoU of 84.7 %. The highest efficiency was achieved by ENet with a mean inference time of 9.22 ms per image. It is shown that 10 additional images from a new patient are sufficient for patient-specific fine-tuning. Conclusion CNN-based methods for semantic segmentation are applicable to endoscopic images of laryngeal soft tissue. The segmentation can be used for active constraints or to monitor morphological changes and autonomously detect pathologies. Further improvements could be achieved by using a larger dataset or training the models in a self-supervised manner on additional unlabeled data.

Includes members:
  Member "denoising adversarial autoencoders classifying skin lesions using limited labelled training data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "semantic denoising autoencoders for retinal optical coherence tomography")
  Member "interactive medical image segmentation using deep learning with image specific fine tuning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "bi directional dermoscopic feature learning and multi scale consistent decision fusion for skin lesion segmentation")
  Member "convolutional neural networks for medical image analysis full training or fine tuning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the future of digital health with federated learning")
  Member "focal loss for dense object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "automatic classification of cancerous tissue in laserendomicroscopy images of the oral cavity using deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "deep transfer learning methods for colon cancer classification in confocal laser microscopy images")
  Member "enet a deep neural network architecture for real time semantic segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "highly efficient salient object detection with 100k parameters")
  Member "what uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")
  Member "the cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "gan compression efficient architectures for interactive conditional gans")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)