human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "towards a fatality aware benchmark of probabilistic reaction prediction in highly interactive driving scenarios"):
  Abstract: Autonomous vehicles should be able to generate accurate probabilistic predictions for uncertain behavior of other road users. Moreover, reactive predictions are necessary in highly interactive driving scenarios to answer "what if I take this action in the future" for autonomous vehicles. There is no existing unified framework to homogenize the problem formulation, representation simplification, and evaluation metric for various prediction methods, such as probabilistic graphical models (PGM), neural networks (NN) and inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). In this paper, we formulate a probabilistic reaction prediction problem, and reveal the relationship between reaction and situation prediction problems. We employ prototype trajectories with designated motion patterns other than "intention" to homogenize the representation so that probabilities corresponding to each trajectory generated by different methods can be evaluated. We also discuss the reasons why "intention" is not suitable to serve as a motion indicator in highly interactive scenarios. We propose to use Brier score as the baseline metric for evaluation. In order to reveal the fatality of the consequences when the predictions are adopted by decision-making and planning, we propose a fatality-aware metric, which is a weighted Brier score based on the criticality of the trajectory pairs of the interacting entities. Conservatism and non-defensiveness are defined from the weighted Brier score to indicate the consequences caused by inaccurate predictions. Modified methods based on PGM, NN and IRL are provided to generate probabilistic reaction predictions in an exemplar scenario of nudging from a highway ramp. The results are evaluated by the baseline and proposed metrics to construct a mini benchmark. Analysis on the properties of each method is also provided by comparing the baseline and proposed metric scores.

Includes members:
  Member "a framework for probabilistic generic traffic scene prediction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "generic prediction architecture considering both rational and irrational driving behaviors")
  Member "generic probabilistic interactive situation recognition and prediction from virtual to real":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "social wagdat interaction aware trajectory prediction via wasserstein graph double attention network")
  Member "generic vehicle tracking framework capable of handling occlusions based on modified mixture particle filter":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a novel graph based trajectory predictor with pseudo oracle")
  Member "probabilistic prediction of vehicle semantic intention and motion":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "visionnet a drivable space based interactive motion prediction network for autonomous driving")
  Member "probabilistic prediction of interactive driving behavior via hierarchical inverse reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "social wagdat interaction aware trajectory prediction via wasserstein graph double attention network")
  Member "accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles safety in lane change scenarios based on importance sampling techniques":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "learning to collide an adaptive safety critical scenarios generating method")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.RO(Robotics)