human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "minimizing close k aggregate loss improves classification"):
  Abstract: In classification, the de facto method for aggregating individual losses is the average loss. When the actual metric of interest is 0-1 loss, it is common to minimize the average surrogate loss for some well-behaved (e.g. convex) surrogate. Recently, several other aggregate losses such as the maximal loss and average top-$k$ loss were proposed as alternative objectives to address shortcomings of the average loss. However, we identify common classification settings, e.g. the data is imbalanced, has too many easy or ambiguous examples, etc., when average, maximal and average top-$k$ all suffer from suboptimal decision boundaries, even on an infinitely large training set. To address this problem, we propose a new classification objective called the close-$k$ aggregate loss, where we adaptively minimize the loss for points close to the decision boundary. We provide theoretical guarantees for the 0-1 accuracy when we optimize close-$k$ aggregate loss. We also conduct systematic experiments across the PMLB and OpenML benchmark datasets. Close-$k$ achieves significant gains in 0-1 test accuracy, improvements of $\geq 2$% and $p<0.05$, in over 25% of the datasets compared to average, maximal and average top-$k$. In contrast, the previous aggregate losses outperformed close-$k$ in less than 2% of the datasets.

Includes members:
  Member "learning to reweight examples for robust deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "noise estimation using density estimation for self supervised multimodal learning")
  Member "focal loss for dense object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "pmlb a large benchmark suite for machine learning evaluation and comparison":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the tree ensemble layer differentiability meets conditional computation")
  Member "minimizing the maximal loss how and why":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "distribution agnostic model agnostic meta learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)