human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "combo loss handling input and output imbalance in multi organ segmentation"):
  Abstract: Simultaneous segmentation of multiple organs from different medical imaging modalities is a crucial task as it can be utilized for computer-aided diagnosis, computer-assisted surgery, and therapy planning. Thanks to the recent advances in deep learning, several deep neural networks for medical image segmentation have been introduced successfully for this purpose. In this paper, we focus on learning a deep multi-organ segmentation network that labels voxels. In particular, we examine the critical choice of a loss function in order to handle the notorious imbalance problem that plagues both the input and output of a learning model. The input imbalance refers to the class-imbalance in the input training samples (i.e., small foreground objects embedded in an abundance of background voxels, as well as organs of varying sizes). The output imbalance refers to the imbalance between the false positives and false negatives of the inference model. In order to tackle both types of imbalance during training and inference, we introduce a new curriculum learning based loss function. Specifically, we leverage Dice similarity coefficient to deter model parameters from being held at bad local minima and at the same time gradually learn better model parameters by penalizing for false positives/negatives using a cross entropy term. We evaluated the proposed loss function on three datasets: whole body positron emission tomography (PET) scans with 5 target organs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate scans, and ultrasound echocardigraphy images with a single target organ i.e., left ventricular. We show that a simple network architecture with the proposed integrative loss function can outperform state-of-the-art methods and results of the competing methods can be improved when our proposed loss is used.

Includes members:
  Member "deepigeos a deep interactive geodesic framework for medical image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a survey on active learning and human in the loop deep learning for medical image analysis")
  Member "revisiting small batch training for deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "hyper parameter optimization a review of algorithms and applications")
  Member "focal loss for dense object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "an exploration of 2d and 3d deep learning techniques for cardiac mr image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "deep learning in cardiology")
  Member "generalised dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on the road with 16 neurons mental imagery with bio inspired deep neural networks")
  Member "a survey on deep learning in medical image analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "medgan medical image translation using gans")
  Member "hyperparameters optimization in deep convolutional neural network bayesian approach with gaussian process prior":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "interactive subspace exploration on generative image modelling")
  Member "3d u net learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "convolutional occupancy networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)