human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "conversational flow in oxford style debates"):
  Abstract: Public debates are a common platform for presenting and juxtaposing diverging views on important issues. In this work we propose a methodology for tracking how ideas flow between participants throughout a debate. We use this approach in a case study of Oxford-style debates---a competitive format where the winner is determined by audience votes---and show how the outcome of a debate depends on aspects of conversational flow. In particular, we find that winners tend to make better use of a debate's interactive component than losers, by actively pursuing their opponents' points rather than promoting their own ideas over the course of the conversation.

Includes members:
  Member "a piece of my mind a sentiment analysis approach for online dispute detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "trouble on the horizon forecasting the derailment of online conversations as they develop")
  Member "conversational markers of constructive discussions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "trouble on the horizon forecasting the derailment of online conversations as they develop")
  Member "winning arguments interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good faith online discussions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "ten social dimensions of conversations and relationships")
  Member "linguistic harbingers of betrayal a case study on an online strategy game":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "trouble on the horizon forecasting the derailment of online conversations as they develop")
  Member "mimicry is presidential linguistic style matching in presidential debates and improved polling numbers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "get out the vote determining support or opposition from congressional floor debate transcripts":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "stance detection benchmark how robust is your stance detection")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)