human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "learning using 1 local membership queries"):
  Abstract: Classic machine learning algorithms learn from labelled examples. For example, to design a machine translation system, a typical training set will consist of English sentences and their translation. There is a stronger model, in which the algorithm can also query for labels of new examples it creates. E.g, in the translation task, the algorithm can create a new English sentence, and request its translation from the user during training. This combination of examples and queries has been widely studied. Yet, despite many theoretical results, query algorithms are almost never used. One of the main causes for this is a report (Baum and Lang, 1992) on very disappointing empirical performance of a query algorithm. These poor results were mainly attributed to the fact that the algorithm queried for labels of examples that are artificial, and impossible to interpret by humans. #R##N#In this work we study a new model of local membership queries (Awasthi et al., 2012), which tries to resolve the problem of artificial queries. In this model, the algorithm is only allowed to query the labels of examples which are close to examples from the training set. E.g., in translation, the algorithm can change individual words in a sentence it has already seen, and then ask for the translation. In this model, the examples queried by the algorithm will be close to natural examples and hence, hopefully, will not appear as artificial or random. We focus on 1-local queries (i.e., queries of distance 1 from an example in the training sample). We show that 1-local membership queries are already stronger than the standard learning model. We also present an experiment on a well known NLP task of sentiment analysis. In this experiment, the users were asked to provide more information than merely indicating the label. We present results that illustrate that this extra information is beneficial in practice.

Includes members:
  Member "complexity theoretic limitations on learning dnf s":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "toward deeper understanding of neural networks the power of initialization and a dual view on expressivity")
  Member "from average case complexity to improper learning complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "time space tradeoffs for distinguishing distributions and applications to security of goldreich s prg")
  Member "more data speeds up training time in learning halfspaces over sparse vectors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "time space tradeoffs for distinguishing distributions and applications to security of goldreich s prg")
  Member "learning using local membership queries":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "on the hardness of robust classification")
  Member "a sentimental education sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sbert wk a sentence embedding method by dissecting bert based word models")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)