human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "satisfaction in societies with opinion leaders and mediators properties and an axiomatization"):
  Abstract: In this paper we propose the opinion leader-follower through mediators systems — OLFM systems— a multiple-action collective choice model for societies. In those societies three kind of actors are considered: opinion leaders that can exert certain influence over the decision of other actors, followers that can be convinced to modify their original decisions, and independent actors that neither are influenced nor can influence; mediators are actors that both are influenced and influence other actors. This is a generalization of the opinion leader-follower systems —OLF systems— proposed by (9). The satisfaction score is defined on the set of actors. For each actor it measures the number of society initial decisions in which the final collective decision coincides with the one that the actor initially selected. We generalize in OLFM systems some properties that the satisfaction score meets for OLF systems. By using these properties, we provide an axiomatization of the satisfaction score for the case in which followers maintain their own initial decisions unless all their opinion leaders share an opposite inclination. This new axiomatization generalizes the one given by (10) for OLF systems under the same restrictions.

Includes members:
  Member "social influence as a voting system a complexity analysis of parameters and properties":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "power indices of influence games and new centrality measures for social networks")
  Member "computing the nucleolus of weighted voting games":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "computing stable outcomes in symmetric additively separable hedonic games")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)