human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping"):
  Abstract: Classic similarity measures of strings are longest common subsequence and Levenshtein distance (i.e., the classic edit distance). A classic similarity measure of curves is dynamic time warping. These measures can be computed by simple $O(n^2)$ dynamic programming algorithms, and despite much effort no algorithms with significantly better running time are known. #R##N#We prove that, even restricted to binary strings or one-dimensional curves, respectively, these measures do not have strongly subquadratic time algorithms, i.e., no algorithms with running time $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. We generalize the result to edit distance for arbitrary fixed costs of the four operations (deletion in one of the two strings, matching, substitution), by identifying trivial cases that can be solved in constant time, and proving quadratic-time hardness on binary strings for all other cost choices. This improves and generalizes the known hardness result for Levenshtein distance [Backurs, Indyk STOC'15] by the restriction to binary strings and the generalization to arbitrary costs, and adds important problems to a recent line of research showing conditional lower bounds for a growing number of quadratic time problems. #R##N#As our main technical contribution, we introduce a framework for proving quadratic-time hardness of similarity measures. To apply the framework it suffices to construct a single gadget, which encapsulates all the expressive power necessary to emulate a reduction from satisfiability. #R##N#Finally, we prove quadratic-time hardness for longest palindromic subsequence and longest tandem subsequence via reductions from longest common subsequence, showing that conditional lower bounds based on the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis also apply to string problems that are not necessarily similarity measures.

Includes members:
  Member "quadratic time hardness of lcs and other sequence similarity measures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "dynamic time warping in strongly subquadratic time algorithms for the low distance regime and approximate evaluation")
  Member "why walking the dog takes time frechet distance has no strongly subquadratic algorithms unless seth fails":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "graphs cannot be indexed in polynomial time for sub quadratic time string matching unless seth fails")
  Member "popular conjectures imply strong lower bounds for dynamic problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "new algorithms and hardness for incremental single source shortest paths in directed graphs")
  Member "edit distance cannot be computed in strongly subquadratic time unless seth is false":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "streaming with oracle new streaming algorithms for edit distance and lcs")
  Member "polylogarithmic approximation for edit distance and the asymmetric query complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "streaming with oracle new streaming algorithms for edit distance and lcs")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)