human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "continuous partial quorums for consistency latency tuning in distributed nosql storage systems"):
  Abstract: NoSQL storage systems are used extensively by web applications and provide an attractive alternative to conventional databases when the need for scalability outweighs the need for transactions. Several of these systems provide quorum-based replication and present the application developer with a choice of multiple client-side "consistency levels" that determine the number of replicas accessed by reads and writes, which in turn affects both latency and the consistency observed by the client application. Since using a fixed combination of read and write consistency levels for a given application provides only a limited number of discrete options, we investigate techniques that allow more fine-grained tuning of the consistency-latency trade-off, as may be required to support consistency-based service level agreements (SLAs). We propose a novel technique called \emph{continuous partial quorums} (CPQ) that assigns the consistency level on a per-operation basis by choosing randomly between two options, such as eventual and strong consistency, with a tunable probability. We evaluate our technique experimentally using Apache Cassandra and demonstrate that it outperforms an alternative tuning technique that delays operations artificially.

Includes members:
  Member "characterizing and adapting the consistency latency tradeoff in distributed key value stores":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "consistency analysis of replication based probabilistic key value stores")
  Member "probabilistically bounded staleness for practical partial quorums":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "consistency analysis of replication based probabilistic key value stores")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)