human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "efficiency guarantees in auctions with budgets"):
  Abstract: In settings where players have a limited access to liquidity, represented in the form of budget constraints, efficiency maximization has proven to be a challenging goal. In particular, the social welfare cannot be approximated by a better factor then the number of players. Therefore, the literature has mainly resorted to Pareto-efficiency as a way to achieve efficiency in such settings. While successful in some important scenarios, in many settings it is known that either exactly one incentive-compatible auction that always outputs a Pareto-efficient solution, or that no truthful mechanism can always guarantee a Pareto-efficient outcome. Traditionally, impossibility results can be avoided by considering approximations. However, Pareto-efficiency is a binary property (is either satisfied or not), which does not allow for approximations. #R##N#In this paper we propose a new notion of efficiency, called \emph{liquid welfare}. This is the maximum amount of revenue an omniscient seller would be able to extract from a certain instance. We explain the intuition behind this objective function and show that it can be 2-approximated by two different auctions. Moreover, we show that no truthful algorithm can guarantee an approximation factor better than 4/3 with respect to the liquid welfare, and provide a truthful auction that attains this bound in a special case. #R##N#Importantly, the liquid welfare benchmark also overcomes impossibilities for some settings. While it is impossible to design Pareto-efficient auctions for multi-unit auctions where players have decreasing marginal values, we give a deterministic $O(\log n)$-approximation for the liquid welfare in this setting.

Includes members:
  Member "polyhedral clinching auctions and the adwords polytope":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "pricing in resource allocation games based on lagrangean duality and convexification")
  Member "clinching auctions with online supply":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "polyhedral clinching auctions for two sided markets")
  Member "prior free auctions for budgeted agents":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a simple mechanism for a budget constrained buyer")
  Member "composable and efficient mechanisms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "complexity theory game theory and economics the barbados lectures")
  Member "bayesian mechanism design for budget constrained agents":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a simple mechanism for a budget constrained buyer")
  Member "incentive compatible budget elicitation in multi unit auctions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a simple mechanism for a budget constrained buyer")
  Member "general auction mechanism for search advertising":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "reserve pricing in repeated second price auctions with strategic bidders")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)