human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "how does knowledge of the auc constrain the set of possible ground truth labelings"):
  Abstract: Recent work on privacy-preserving machine learning has considered how data-mining competitions such as Kaggle could potentially be "hacked", either intentionally or inadvertently, by using information from an oracle that reports a classifier's accuracy on the test set. For binary classification tasks in particular, one of the most common accuracy metrics is the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), and in this paper we explore the mathematical structure of how the AUC is computed from an n-vector of real-valued "guesses" with respect to the ground-truth labels. We show how knowledge of a classifier's AUC on the test set can constrain the set of possible ground-truth labelings, and we derive an algorithm both to compute the exact number of such labelings and to enumerate efficiently over them. Finally, we provide empirical evidence that, surprisingly, the number of compatible labelings can actually decrease as n grows, until a test set-dependent threshold is reached.

Includes members:
  Member "the ladder a reliable leaderboard for machine learning competitions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "do imagenet classifiers generalize to imagenet")
  Member "exploiting an oracle that reports auc scores in machine learning contests":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "climbing the kaggle leaderboard by exploiting the log loss oracle")
  Member "preventing false discovery in interactive data analysis is hard":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "preserving statistical validity in adaptive data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "differentially private algorithms for empirical machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "minimax rates of estimating approximate differential privacy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)