human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on the consistency of auc pairwise optimization"):
  Abstract: AUC (area under ROC curve) is an important evaluation criterion, which has been popularly used in many learning tasks such as class-imbalance learning, cost-sensitive learning, learning to rank, etc. Many learning approaches try to optimize AUC, while owing to the non-convexity and discontinuousness of AUC, almost all approaches work with surrogate loss functions. Thus, the consistency of AUC is crucial; however, it has been almost untouched before. In this paper, we provide a sufficient condition for the asymptotic consistency of learning approaches based on surrogate loss functions. Based on this result, we prove that exponential loss and logistic loss are consistent with AUC, but hinge loss is inconsistent. Then, we derive the $q$-norm hinge loss and general hinge loss that are consistent with AUC. We also derive the consistent bounds for exponential loss and logistic loss, and obtain the consistent bounds for many surrogate loss functions under the non-noise setting. Further, we disclose an equivalence between the exponential surrogate loss of AUC and exponential surrogate loss of accuracy, and one straightforward consequence of such finding is that AdaBoost and RankBoost are equivalent.

Includes members:
  Member "one pass auc optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "weakly supervised learning meets ride sharing user experience enhancement")
  Member "on the generalization ability of online learning algorithms for pairwise loss functions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "stability and optimization error of stochastic gradient descent for pairwise learning")
  Member "surrogate regret bounds for bipartite ranking via strongly proper losses":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "risk bounds for low cost bipartite ranking")
  Member "learning to order things":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "improving label ranking ensembles using boosting techniques")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)