human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "achieving secure and differentially private computations in multiparty settings"):
  Abstract: Sharing and working on sensitive data in distributed settings from healthcare to finance is a major challenge due to security and privacy concerns. Secure multiparty computation (SMC) is a viable panacea for this, allowing distributed parties to make computations while the parties learn nothing about their data, but the final result. Although SMC is instrumental in such distributed settings, it does not provide any guarantees not to leak any information about individuals to adversaries. Differential privacy (DP) can be utilized to address this; however, achieving SMC with DP is not a trivial task, either. In this paper, we propose a novel Secure Multiparty Distributed Differentially Private (SM-DDP) protocol to achieve secure and private computations in a multiparty environment. Specifically, with our protocol, we simultaneously achieve SMC and DP in distributed settings focusing on linear regression on horizontally distributed data. That is, parties do not see each others' data and further, can not infer information about individuals from the final constructed statistical model. Any statistical model function that allows independent calculation of local statistics can be computed through our protocol. The protocol implements homomorphic encryption for SMC and functional mechanism for DP to achieve the desired security and privacy guarantees. In this work, we first introduce the theoretical foundation for the SM-DDP protocol and then evaluate its efficacy and performance on two different datasets. Our results show that one can achieve individual-level privacy through the proposed protocol with distributed DP, which is independently applied by each party in a distributed fashion. Moreover, our results also show that the SM-DDP protocol incurs minimal computational overhead, is scalable, and provides security and privacy guarantees.

Includes members:
  Member "a survey on homomorphic encryption schemes theory and implementation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "short range audio channels security survey of mechanisms applications and research challenges")
  Member "building better detection with privileged information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "microsoft malware classification challenge")
  Member "extending detection with forensic information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "incorporating privileged information to unsupervised anomaly detection")
  Member "patient driven privacy control through generalized distillation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "curie policy based secure data exchange")
  Member "controlled data sharing for collaborative predictive blacklisting":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on collaborative predictive blacklisting")
  Member "functional mechanism regression analysis under differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "privacy for all demystify vulnerability disparity of differential privacy against membership inference attack")
  Member "differentially private empirical risk minimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "scaffold stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning")
  Member "composition attacks and auxiliary information in data privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "local differential privacy for deep learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)