human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "attack and defense of dynamic analysis based adversarial neural malware classification models"):
  Abstract: Recently researchers have proposed using deep learning-based systems for malware detection. Unfortunately, all deep learning classification systems are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Previous work has studied adversarial attacks against static analysis-based malware classifiers which only classify the content of the unknown file without execution. However, since the majority of malware is either packed or encrypted, malware classification based on static analysis often fails to detect these types of files. To overcome this limitation, anti-malware companies typically perform dynamic analysis by emulating each file in the anti-malware engine or performing in-depth scanning in a virtual machine. These strategies allow the analysis of the malware after unpacking or decryption. In this work, we study different strategies of crafting adversarial samples for dynamic analysis. These strategies operate on sparse, binary inputs in contrast to continuous inputs such as pixels in images. We then study the effects of two, previously proposed defensive mechanisms against crafted adversarial samples including the distillation and ensemble defenses. We also propose and evaluate the weight decay defense. Experiments show that with these three defensive strategies, the number of successfully crafted adversarial samples is reduced compared to a standard baseline system without any defenses. In particular, the ensemble defense is the most resilient to adversarial attacks. Importantly, none of the defenses significantly reduce the classification accuracy for detecting malware. Finally, we demonstrate that while adding additional hidden layers to neural models does not significantly improve the malware classification accuracy, it does significantly increase the classifier's robustness to adversarial attacks.

Includes members:
  Member "feature squeezing detecting adversarial examples in deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "hardening classifiers against evasion the good the bad and the ugly":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on training robust pdf malware classifiers")
  Member "on the statistical detection of adversarial examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "anomalous instance detection in deep learning a survey")
  Member "adversarial perturbations against deep neural networks for malware classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "on the security of randomized defenses against adversarial samples")
  Member "ensemble robustness of deep learning algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on model stability as a function of random seed")
  Member "stealing machine learning models via prediction apis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "dynamic backdoor attacks against machine learning models")
  Member "practical black box attacks against deep learning systems using adversarial examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence")
  Member "deep neural network based malware detection using two dimensional binary program features":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "automatic generation of adversarial examples for interpreting malware classifiers")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)