human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "optimal algorithms for hitting topological minors on graphs of bounded treewidth"):
  Abstract: For a fixed collection of graphs ${\cal F}$, the ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, decide whether there exists $S \subseteq V(G)$ with $|S| \leq k$ such that $G \setminus S$ does not contain any of the graphs in ${\cal F}$ as a minor. We are interested in the parameterized complexity of ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION when the parameter is the treewidth of $G$, denoted by $tw$. Our objective is to determine, for a fixed ${\cal F}$, the smallest function $f_{{\cal F}}$ such that ${\cal F}$-M-DELETION can be solved in time $f_{{\cal F}}(tw) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ on $n$-vertex graphs. Using and enhancing the machinery of boundaried graphs and small sets of representatives introduced by Bodlaender et al. [J ACM, 2016], we prove that when all the graphs in ${\cal F}$ are connected and at least one of them is planar, then $f_{{\cal F}}(w) = 2^{O (w \cdot\log w)}$. When ${\cal F}$ is a singleton containing a clique, a cycle, or a path on $i$ vertices, we prove the following asymptotically tight bounds: #R##N#$\bullet$ $f_{\{K_4\}}(w) = 2^{\Theta (w \cdot \log w)}$. #R##N#$\bullet$ $f_{\{C_i\}}(w) = 2^{\Theta (w)}$ for every $i \leq 4$, and $f_{\{C_i\}}(w) = 2^{\Theta (w \cdot\log w)}$ for every $i \geq 5$. #R##N#$\bullet$ $f_{\{P_i\}}(w) = 2^{\Theta (w)}$ for every $i \leq 4$, and $f_{\{P_i\}}(w) = 2^{\Theta (w \cdot \log w)}$ for every $i \geq 6$. #R##N#The lower bounds hold unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, and the superexponential ones are inspired by a reduction of Marcin Pilipczuk [Discrete Appl Math, 2016]. The single-exponential algorithms use, in particular, the rank-based approach introduced by Bodlaender et al. [Inform Comput, 2015]. We also consider the version of the problem where the graphs in ${\cal F}$ are forbidden as topological minors, and prove that essentially the same set of results holds.

Includes members:
  Member "slightly superexponential parameterized problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the complexity of finding large odd induced subgraphs and odd colorings")
  Member "deleting vertices to graphs of bounded genus":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a complexity dichotomy for hitting connected minors on bounded treewidth graphs the chair and the banner draw the boundary")
  Member "how much does a treedepth modulator help to obtain polynomial kernels beyond sparse graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on the approximate compressibility of connected vertex cover")
  Member "bidimensionality and kernels":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "hitting topological minors is fpt")
  Member "a tight lower bound for vertex planarization on graphs of bounded treewidth":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a complexity dichotomy for hitting connected minors on bounded treewidth graphs the chair and the banner draw the boundary")
  Member "hitting and harvesting pumpkins":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "parameterized vertex deletion problems for hereditary graph classes with a block property")
  Member "explicit linear kernels via dynamic programming":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a complexity dichotomy for hitting connected minors on bounded treewidth graphs the chair and the banner draw the boundary")
  Member "linear kernels and single exponential algorithms via protrusion decompositions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "hitting topological minors is fpt")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)