human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "multi party set reconciliation using characteristic polynomials"):
  Abstract: In the standard set reconciliation problem, there are two parties $A_1$ and $A_2$, each respectively holding a set of elements $S_1$ and $S_2$. The goal is for both parties to obtain the union $S_1 \cup S_2$. In many distributed computing settings the sets may be large but the set difference $|S_1-S_2|+|S_2-S_1|$ is small. In these cases one aims to achieve reconciliation efficiently in terms of communication; ideally, the communication should depend on the size of the set difference, and not on the size of the sets. #R##N#Recent work has considered generalizations of the reconciliation problem to multi-party settings, using a framework based on a specific type of linear sketch called an Invertible Bloom Lookup Table. Here, we consider multi-party set reconciliation using the alternative framework of characteristic polynomials, which have previously been used for efficient pairwise set reconciliation protocols, and compare their performance with Invertible Bloom Lookup Tables for these problems.

Includes members:
  Member "simple multi party set reconciliation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bandwidth efficient transaction relay for bitcoin")
  Member "invertible bloom lookup tables":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "peeling close to the orientability threshold spatial coupling in hashing based data structures")
  Member "analyzing network coding gossip made easy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "synchronous transmissions in low power wireless a survey of communication protocols and network services")
  Member "fuzzy extractors how to generate strong keys from biometrics and other noisy data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a capacity achieving one message key agreement with finite blocklength analysis")
  Member "straggler identification in round trip data streams via newton s identities and invertible bloom filters":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "peeling close to the orientability threshold spatial coupling in hashing based data structures")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)