human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a pumping lemma for non cooperative self assembly"):
  Abstract: We prove the computational weakness of a model of tile assembly that has so far resisted many attempts of formal analysis or positive constructions. Specifically, we prove that, in Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model, when restricted to use only noncooperative bindings, any long enough path that can grow in all terminal assemblies is pumpable, meaning that this path can be extended into an infinite, ultimately periodic path. #R##N#This result can be seen as a geometric generalization of the pumping lemma of finite state automata, and closes the question of what can be computed deterministically in this model. Moreover, this question has motivated the development of a new method called visible glues. We believe that this method can also be used to tackle other long-standing problems in computational geometry, in relation for instance with self-avoiding paths. #R##N#Tile assembly (including non-cooperative tile assembly) was originally introduced by Winfree and Rothemund in STOC 2000 to understand how to program shapes. The non-cooperative variant, also known as temperature 1 tile assembly, is the model where tiles are allowed to bind as soon as they match on one side, whereas in cooperative tile assembly, some tiles need to match on several sides in order to bind. In this work, we prove that only very simple shapes can indeed be programmed, whereas exactly one known result (SODA 2014) showed a restriction on the assemblies general non-cooperative self-assembly could achieve, without any implication on its computational expressiveness. With non-square tiles (like polyominos, SODA 2015), other recent works have shown that the model quickly becomes computationally powerful.

Includes members:
  Member "universal computation with arbitrary polyomino tiles in non cooperative self assembly":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "the power of duples in self assembly it s not so hip to be square":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "the two handed tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "intrinsic universality in tile self assembly requires cooperation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "intrinsic universality and the computational power of self assembly":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "the self assembly of paths and squares at temperature 1":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "size separable tile self assembly a tight bound for temperature 1 mismatch free systems")
  Member "one tile to rule them all simulating any turing machine tile assembly system or tiling system with a single puzzle piece":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "two hands are better than one up to constant factors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)