human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "relative upper confidence bound for the k armed dueling bandit problem"):
  Abstract: This paper proposes a new method for the K-armed dueling bandit problem, a variation on the regular K-armed bandit problem that offers only relative feedback about pairs of arms. Our approach extends the Upper Confidence Bound algorithm to the relative setting by using estimates of the pairwise probabilities to select a promising arm and applying Upper Confidence Bound with the winner as a benchmark. We prove a finite-time regret bound of order O(log t). In addition, our empirical results using real data from an information retrieval application show that it greatly outperforms the state of the art.

Includes members:
  Member "exponential regret bounds for gaussian process bandits with deterministic observations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on hyper parameter tuning for stochastic optimization algorithms")
  Member "information theoretic regret bounds for gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "efficient and robust algorithms for adversarial linear contextual bandits")
  Member "an adaptive algorithm for finite stochastic partial monitoring":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "dcm bandits learning to rank with multiple clicks")
  Member "analysis of thompson sampling for the multi armed bandit problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "effective diversity in population based reinforcement learning")
  Member "x armed bandits":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on thompson sampling for smoother than lipschitz bandits")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)