human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "kgan how to break the minimax game in gan"):
  Abstract: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) were intuitively and attractively explained under the perspective of game theory, wherein two involving parties are a discriminator and a generator. In this game, the task of the discriminator is to discriminate the real and generated (i.e., fake) data, whilst the task of the generator is to generate the fake data that maximally confuses the discriminator. In this paper, we propose a new viewpoint for GANs, which is termed as the minimizing general loss viewpoint. This viewpoint shows a connection between the general loss of a classification problem regarding a convex loss function and a f-divergence between the true and fake data distributions. Mathematically, we proposed a setting for the classification problem of the true and fake data, wherein we can prove that the general loss of this classification problem is exactly the negative f-divergence for a certain convex function f. This allows us to interpret the problem of learning the generator for dismissing the f-divergence between the true and fake data distributions as that of maximizing the general loss which is equivalent to the min-max problem in GAN if the Logistic loss is used in the classification problem. However, this viewpoint strengthens GANs in two ways. First, it allows us to employ any convex loss function for the discriminator. Second, it suggests that rather than limiting ourselves in NN-based discriminators, we can alternatively utilize other powerful families. Bearing this viewpoint, we then propose using the kernel-based family for discriminators. This family has two appealing features: i) a powerful capacity in classifying non-linear nature data and ii) being convex in the feature space. Using the convexity of this family, we can further develop Fenchel duality to equivalently transform the max-min problem to the max-max dual problem.

Includes members:
  Member "dual discriminator generative adversarial nets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "microbatchgan stimulating diversity with multi adversarial discrimination")
  Member "photo realistic single image super resolution using a generative adversarial network":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "density estimation using real nvp":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "unrolled generative adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "pixel recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "mast a memory augmented self supervised tracker")
  Member "generative visual manipulation on the natural image manifold":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "deep generative image models using a laplacian pyramid of adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "transformation based adversarial video prediction on large scale data")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)