human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "interpretation of semantic tweet representations"):
  Abstract: Research in analysis of microblogging platforms is experiencing a renewed surge with a large number of works applying representation learning models for applications like sentiment analysis, semantic textual similarity computation, hashtag prediction, etc. Although the performance of the representation learning models has been better than the traditional baselines for such tasks, little is known about the elementary properties of a tweet encoded within these representations, or why particular representations work better for certain tasks. Our work presented here constitutes the first step in opening the black-box of vector embeddings for tweets. Traditional feature engineering methods for high-level applications have exploited various elementary properties of tweets. We believe that a tweet representation is effective for an application because it meticulously encodes the application-specific elementary properties of tweets. To understand the elementary properties encoded in a tweet representation, we evaluate the representations on the accuracy to which they can model each of those properties such as tweet length, presence of particular words, hashtags, mentions, capitalization, etc. Our systematic extensive study of nine supervised and four unsupervised tweet representations against most popular eight textual and five social elementary properties reveal that Bi-directional LSTMs (BLSTMs) and Skip-Thought Vectors (STV) best encode the textual and social properties of tweets respectively. FastText is the best model for low resource settings, providing very little degradation with reduction in embedding size. Finally, we draw interesting insights by correlating the model performance obtained for elementary property prediction tasks with the highlevel downstream applications.

Includes members:
  Member "semeval 2016 task 4 sentiment analysis in twitter":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "related tasks can share a multi task framework for affective language")
  Member "tweet2vec character based distributed representations for social media":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "maskdga a black box evasion technique against dga classifiers and adversarial defenses")
  Member "fine grained analysis of sentence embeddings using auxiliary prediction tasks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "sentence analogies exploring linguistic relationships and regularities in sentence embeddings")
  Member "siamese cbow optimizing word embeddings for sentence representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "unsupervised common question generation from multiple documents using reinforced contrastive coordinator")
  Member "learning distributed representations of sentences from unlabelled data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "contextual lensing of universal sentence representations")
  Member "bag of tricks for efficient text classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "description based text classification with reinforcement learning")
  Member "skip thought vectors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "improved semantic representations from tree structured long short term memory networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "unbiased scene graph generation from biased training")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)