human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "degrees of freedom of mimo cellular networks decomposition and linear beamforming design"):
  Abstract: This paper investigates the symmetric degrees of freedom (DoF) of MIMO cellular networks with G cells and K users per cell, having N antennas at each base station and M antennas at each user. In particular, we investigate achievability techniques based on either decomposition with asymptotic interference alignment (IA) or linear beamforming schemes, and show that there are distinct regimes of (G,K,M,N) where one outperforms the other. We first note that both one-sided and two-sided decomposition with asymptotic IA achieve the same degrees of freedom. We then establish specific antenna configurations under which the DoF achieved using decomposition based schemes is optimal by deriving a set of outer bounds on the symmetric DoF. For linear beamforming schemes, we first focus on small networks and propose a structured approach to linear beamforming based on a notion called packing ratios. Packing ratio describes the interference footprint or shadow cast by a set of transmit beamformers and enables us to identify the underlying structures for aligning interference. Such a structured beamforming design can be shown to achieve the optimal spatially normalized DoF (sDoF) of two-cell two-user/cell network and the two-cell three-user/cell network. For larger networks, we develop an unstructured approach to linear interference alignment, where transmit beamformers are designed to satisfy conditions for IA without explicitly identifying the underlying structures for IA. The main numerical insight of this paper is that such an approach appears to be capable of achieving the optimal sDoF for MIMO cellular networks in regimes where linear beamforming dominates asymptotic decomposition, and a significant portion of sDoF elsewhere. Remarkably, polynomial identity test appears to play a key role in identifying the boundary of the achievable sDoF region in the former case.

Includes members:
  Member "real interference alignment exploiting the potential of single antenna systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "multi antenna coded content delivery with caching a low complexity solution")
  Member "progress on polynomial identity testing ii":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a generalized sylvester gallai type theorem for quadratic polynomials")
  Member "on the feasibility of linear interference alignment for mimo interference broadcast channels with constant coefficients":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "role of interference alignment in wireless cellular network optimization")
  Member "genie chain and degrees of freedom of symmetric mimo interference broadcast channels":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "role of interference alignment in wireless cellular network optimization")
  Member "on the degrees of freedom achievable through interference alignment in a mimo interference channel":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "centralized and decentralized cache aided interference management in heterogeneous parallel channels")
  Member "a feasibility test for linear interference alignment in mimo channels with constant coefficients":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "role of interference alignment in wireless cellular network optimization")
  Member "degrees of freedom of mimo x networks spatial scale invariance one sided decomposability and linear feasibility":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "degrees of freedom of interference networks with transmitter side caches")
  Member "subspace alignment chains and the degrees of freedom of the three user mimo interference channel":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "on the degrees of freedom of the miso interference broadcast channel with delayed csit")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)