human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "convergent learning do different neural networks learn the same representations"):
  Abstract: Recent success in training deep neural networks have prompted active investigation into the features learned on their intermediate layers. Such research is difficult because it requires making sense of non-linear computations performed by millions of parameters, but valuable because it increases our ability to understand current models and create improved versions of them. In this paper we investigate the extent to which neural networks exhibit what we call convergent learning, which is when the representations learned by multiple nets converge to a set of features which are either individually similar between networks or where subsets of features span similar low-dimensional spaces. We propose a specific method of probing representations: training multiple networks and then comparing and contrasting their individual, learned representations at the level of neurons or groups of neurons. We begin research into this question using three techniques to approximately align different neural networks on a feature level: a bipartite matching approach that makes one-to-one assignments between neurons, a sparse prediction approach that finds one-to-many mappings, and a spectral clustering approach that finds many-to-many mappings. This initial investigation reveals a few previously unknown properties of neural networks, and we argue that future research into the question of convergent learning will yield many more. The insights described here include (1) that some features are learned reliably in multiple networks, yet other features are not consistently learned; (2) that units learn to span low-dimensional subspaces and, while these subspaces are common to multiple networks, the specific basis vectors learned are not; (3) that the representation codes show evidence of being a mix between a local code and slightly, but not fully, distributed codes across multiple units.

Includes members:
  Member "understanding neural networks through deep visualization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adapting object detectors with conditional domain normalization")
  Member "understanding deep image representations by inverting them":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "crl class representative learning for image classification")
  Member "how transferable are features in deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "deep neural networks are easily fooled high confidence predictions for unrecognizable images":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "sam the sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters")
  Member "identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high dimensional non convex optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "understanding global loss landscape of one hidden layer relu neural networks")
  Member "caffe convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "why does deep learning work a perspective from group theory":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "short sighted deep learning")
  Member "understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalence":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "incorporating symmetry into deep dynamics models for improved generalization")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)