human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a selfie is worth a thousand words mining personal patterns behind user selfie posting behaviours"):
  Abstract: Selfies have become increasingly fashionable in the social media era. People are willing to share their selfies in various social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and Flicker. The popularity of selfie have caught researchers' attention, especially psychologists. In computer vision and machine learning areas, little attention has been paid to this phenomenon as a valuable data source. In this paper, we focus on exploring the deeper personal patterns behind people's different kinds of selfie-posting behaviours. We develop this work based on a dataset of WeChat, one of the most extensively used instant messaging platform in China. In particular, we first propose an unsupervised approach to classify the images posted by users. Based on the classification result, we construct three types of user-level features that reflect user preference, activity and posting habit. Based on these features, for a series of selfie related tasks, we build classifiers that can accurately predict two sets of users with opposite selfie-posting behaviours. We have found that people's interest, activity and posting habit have a great influence on their selfie-posting behaviours. For example, the classification accuracy between selfie-posting addict and nonaddict reaches 89.36%. We also prove that using user's image information to predict these behaviours achieve better performance than using text information. More importantly, for each set of users with a specific selfie-posting behaviour, we extract and visualize significant personal patterns about them. In addition, we cluster users and extract their high-level attributes, revealing the correlation between these attributes and users' selfie-posting behaviours. In the end, we demonstrate that users' selfie-posting behaviour, as a good predictor, could predict their different preferences toward these high-level attributes accurately.

Includes members:
  Member "what the language you tweet says about your occupation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "social media based user embedding a literature review")
  Member "on diffusion restricted social network a measurement study of wechat moments":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "modelling of information diffusion on social networks with applications to wechat")
  Member "deep residual learning for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "identifying relevant messages in a twitter based citizen channel for natural disaster situations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "on identifying disaster related tweets matching based or learning based")
  Member "the lifecycle and cascade of wechat social messaging groups":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "vulnds top k vulnerable sme detection system in networked loans")
  Member "the digital life of walkable streets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "facelift a transparent deep learning framework to beautify urban scenes")
  Member "a picture tells a thousand words about you user interest profiling from user generated visual content":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "user preference prediction in visual data on mobile devices")
  Member "going deeper with convolutions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)