human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "spright a fast and robust framework for sparse walsh hadamard transform"):
  Abstract: We consider the problem of computing the Walsh-Hadamard Transform (WHT) of some $N$-length input vector in the presence of noise, where the $N$-point Walsh spectrum is $K$-sparse with $K = {O}(N^{\delta})$ scaling sub-linearly in the input dimension $N$ for some $0<\delta<1$. Over the past decade, there has been a resurgence in research related to the computation of Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) for some length-$N$ input signal that has a $K$-sparse Fourier spectrum. In particular, through a sparse-graph code design, our earlier work on the Fast Fourier Aliasing-based Sparse Transform (FFAST) algorithm computes the $K$-sparse DFT in time ${O}(K\log K)$ by taking ${O}(K)$ noiseless samples. Inspired by the coding-theoretic design framework, Scheibler et al. proposed the Sparse Fast Hadamard Transform (SparseFHT) algorithm that elegantly computes the $K$-sparse WHT in the absence of noise using ${O}(K\log N)$ samples in time ${O}(K\log^2 N)$. However, the SparseFHT algorithm explicitly exploits the noiseless nature of the problem, and is not equipped to deal with scenarios where the observations are corrupted by noise. Therefore, a question of critical interest is whether this coding-theoretic framework can be made robust to noise. Further, if the answer is yes, what is the extra price that needs to be paid for being robust to noise? In this paper, we show, quite interestingly, that there is {\it no extra price} that needs to be paid for being robust to noise other than a constant factor. In other words, we can maintain the same sample complexity ${O}(K\log N)$ and the computational complexity ${O}(K\log^2 N)$ as those of the noiseless case, using our SParse Robust Iterative Graph-based Hadamard Transform (SPRIGHT) algorithm.

Includes members:
  Member "nearly optimal deterministic algorithm for sparse walsh hadamard transform":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sublinear time non adaptive group testing with o k log n tests via bit mixing coding")
  Member "phasecode fast and efficient compressive phase retrieval based on sparse graph codes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "stronger l2 l2 compressed sensing without iterating")
  Member "sample optimal average case sparse fourier transform in two dimensions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a fast face detection method via convolutional neural network")
  Member "a fast hadamard transform for signals with sub linear sparsity in the transform domain":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "computing a k sparse n length discrete fourier transform using at most 4k samples and o k log k complexity")
  Member "polarization of the r enyi information dimension for single and multi terminal analog compression":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the fractality of polar and reed muller codes")
  Member "computing a k sparse n length discrete fourier transform using at most 4k samples and o k log k complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "an adaptive sublinear time block sparse fourier transform")
  Member "nearly optimal sparse fourier transform":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "privacy preserving learning via deep net pruning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)