human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "generalizing modular logic programs"):
  Abstract: Even though modularity has been studied extensively in conventional logic programming, there are few approaches on how to incorporate modularity into Answer Set Programming, a prominent rule-based declarative programming paradigm. A major approach is Oikarinnen and Janhunen's Gaifman-Shapiro-style architecture of program modules, which provides the composition of program modules. Their module theorem properly strengthens Lifschitz and Turner's splitting set theorem for normal logic programs. However, this approach is limited by module conditions that are imposed in order to ensure the compatibility of their module system with the stable model semantics, namely forcing output signatures of composing modules to be disjoint and disallowing positive cyclic dependencies between different modules. These conditions turn out to be too restrictive in practice and in this paper we discuss alternative ways of lift both restrictions independently, effectively solving the first, widening the applicability of this framework and the scope of the module theorem.

Includes members:
  Member "modularity aspects of disjunctive stable models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "partial compilation of asp programs")
  Member "weight constraints as nested expressions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "strong equivalence and program s structure in arguing essential equivalence between logic programs")
  Member "strong equivalence made easy nested expressions and weight constraints":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on uniform equivalence of epistemic logic programs")
  Member "computing preferred answer sets by meta interpretation in answer set programming":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a family of descriptive approaches to preferred answer sets")
  Member "stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the seventh answer set programming competition design and results")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)