human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "three element min sol and conservative min cost hom"):
  Abstract: Thapper and Zivny [STOC'13] recently classified the complexity of VCSP for all finite-valued constraint languages. However, the complexity of VCSPs for constraint languages that are not finite-valued remains poorly understood. In this paper we study the complexity of two such VCSPs, namely Min-Cost-Hom and Min-Sol. We obtain a full classification for the complexity of Min-Sol on domains that contain at most three elements and for the complexity of conservative Min-Cost-Hom on arbitrary finite domains. Our results answer a question raised by Takhanov [STACS'10, COCOON'10].

Includes members:
  Member "the complexity of finite valued csps":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the complexity of boolean surjective general valued csps")
  Member "the complexity of conservative valued csps":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "representing fitness landscapes by valued constraints to understand the complexity of local search")
  Member "the power of linear programming for valued csps":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "piecewise linear valued csps solvable by linear programming relaxation")
  Member "extensions of the minimum cost homomorphism problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "binarisation for valued constraint satisfaction problems")
  Member "a dichotomy theorem for general minimum cost homomorphism problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "computational complexity of the minimum cost homomorphism problem on three element domains")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)