human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "effective multi query expansions collaborative deep networks for robust landmark retrieval"):
  Abstract: Given a query photo issued by a user (q-user), the landmark retrieval is to return a set of photos with their landmarks similar to those of the query, while the existing studies on the landmark retrieval focus on exploiting geometries of landmarks for similarity matches between candidate photos and a query photo. We observe that the same landmarks provided by different users over social media community may convey different geometry information depending on the viewpoints and/or angles, and may subsequently yield very different results. In fact, dealing with the landmarks with \illshapes caused by the photography of q-users is often nontrivial and has seldom been studied. In this paper we propose a novel framework, namely multi-query expansions, to retrieve semantically robust landmarks by two steps. Firstly, we identify the top-$k$ photos regarding the latent topics of a query landmark to construct multi-query set so as to remedy its possible \illshape. For this purpose, we significantly extend the techniques of Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Then, motivated by the typical \emph{collaborative filtering} methods, we propose to learn a \emph{collaborative} deep networks based semantically, nonlinear and high-level features over the latent factor for landmark photo as the training set, which is formed by matrix factorization over \emph{collaborative} user-photo matrix regarding the multi-query set. The learned deep network is further applied to generate the features for all the other photos, meanwhile resulting into a compact multi-query set within such space. Extensive experiments are conducted on real-world social media data with both landmark photos together with their user information to show the superior performance over the existing methods.

Includes members:
  Member "iterative views agreement an iterative low rank based structured optimization method to multi view spectral clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a bert based sentiment analysis and key entity detection approach for online financial texts")
  Member "harvesting discriminative meta objects with deep cnn features for scene classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "inspect transfer learning architecture with dilated convolution")
  Member "pcanet a simple deep learning baseline for image classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "when deep learning meets data alignment a review on deep registration networks drns")
  Member "return of the devil in the details delving deep into convolutional nets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a survey on deep hashing methods")
  Member "imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "caffe convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "decaf a deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "crl class representative learning for image classification")
  Member "visualizing and understanding convolutional networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)