human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "optimal identity testing with high probability"):
  Abstract: We study the problem of testing identity against a given distribution with a focus on the high confidence regime. More precisely, given samples from an unknown distribution $p$ over $n$ elements, an explicitly given distribution $q$, and parameters $0< \epsilon, \delta < 1$, we wish to distinguish, {\em with probability at least $1-\delta$}, whether the distributions are identical versus $\varepsilon$-far in total variation distance. Most prior work focused on the case that $\delta = \Omega(1)$, for which the sample complexity of identity testing is known to be $\Theta(\sqrt{n}/\epsilon^2)$. Given such an algorithm, one can achieve arbitrarily small values of $\delta$ via black-box amplification, which multiplies the required number of samples by $\Theta(\log(1/\delta))$. #R##N#We show that black-box amplification is suboptimal for any $\delta = o(1)$, and give a new identity tester that achieves the optimal sample complexity. Our new upper and lower bounds show that the optimal sample complexity of identity testing is \[ #R##N#\Theta\left( \frac{1}{\epsilon^2}\left(\sqrt{n \log(1/\delta)} + \log(1/\delta) \right)\right) \] for any $n, \varepsilon$, and $\delta$. For the special case of uniformity testing, where the given distribution is the uniform distribution $U_n$ over the domain, our new tester is surprisingly simple: to test whether $p = U_n$ versus $d_{\mathrm TV}(p, U_n) \geq \varepsilon$, we simply threshold $d_{\mathrm TV}(\widehat{p}, U_n)$, where $\widehat{p}$ is the empirical probability distribution. The fact that this simple "plug-in" estimator is sample-optimal is surprising, even in the constant $\delta$ case. Indeed, it was believed that such a tester would not attain sublinear sample complexity even for constant values of $\varepsilon$ and $\delta$.

Includes members:
  Member "near optimal closeness testing of discrete histogram distributions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "communication and memory efficient testing of discrete distributions")
  Member "fourier based testing for families of distributions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "testing identity of multidimensional histograms")
  Member "a new approach for testing properties of discrete distributions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "private identity testing for high dimensional distributions")
  Member "collision based testers are optimal for uniformity and closeness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "monotone probability distributions over the boolean cube can be learned with sublinear samples")
  Member "testing bayesian networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "monotone probability distributions over the boolean cube can be learned with sublinear samples")
  Member "optimal testing for properties of distributions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "monotone probability distributions over the boolean cube can be learned with sublinear samples")
  Member "optimal algorithms and lower bounds for testing closeness of structured distributions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "communication and memory efficient testing of discrete distributions")
  Member "testing shape restrictions of discrete distributions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "monotone probability distributions over the boolean cube can be learned with sublinear samples")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)