human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deepvoting a robust and explainable deep network for semantic part detection under partial occlusion"):
  Abstract: In this paper, we study the task of detecting semantic parts of an object, e.g., a wheel of a car, under partial occlusion. We propose that all models should be trained without seeing occlusions while being able to transfer the learned knowledge to deal with occlusions. This setting alleviates the difficulty in collecting an exponentially large dataset to cover occlusion patterns and is more essential. In this scenario, the proposal-based deep networks, like RCNN-series, often produce unsatisfactory results, because both the proposal extraction and classification stages may be confused by the irrelevant occluders. To address this, [25] proposed a voting mechanism that combines multiple local visual cues to detect semantic parts. The semantic parts can still be detected even though some visual cues are missing due to occlusions. However, this method is manually-designed, thus is hard to be optimized in an end-to-end manner. #R##N#In this paper, we present DeepVoting, which incorporates the robustness shown by [25] into a deep network, so that the whole pipeline can be jointly optimized. Specifically, it adds two layers after the intermediate features of a deep network, e.g., the pool-4 layer of VGGNet. The first layer extracts the evidence of local visual cues, and the second layer performs a voting mechanism by utilizing the spatial relationship between visual cues and semantic parts. We also propose an improved version DeepVoting+ by learning visual cues from context outside objects. In experiments, DeepVoting achieves significantly better performance than several baseline methods, including Faster-RCNN, for semantic part detection under occlusion. In addition, DeepVoting enjoys explainability as the detection results can be diagnosed via looking up the voting cues.

Includes members:
  Member "visual concepts and compositional voting":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "compositional convolutional neural networks a deep architecture with innate robustness to partial occlusion")
  Member "single shot object detection with enriched semantics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "proposal learning for semi supervised object detection")
  Member "scalenet guiding object proposal generation in supermarkets and beyond":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "msr multi scale shape regression for scene text detection")
  Member "ssd single shot multibox detector":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "deeplab semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets atrous convolution and fully connected crfs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "relationship embedded representation learning for grounding referring expressions")
  Member "v net fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "you only look once unified real time object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "conditional random fields as recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "real time high performance semantic image segmentation of urban street scenes")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)