human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on the complexity of bandit linear optimization"):
  Abstract: We study the attainable regret for online linear optimization problems with bandit feedback, where unlike the full-information setting, the player can only observe its own loss rather than the full loss vector. We show that the price of bandit information in this setting can be as large as $d$, disproving the well-known conjecture that the regret for bandit linear optimization is at most $\sqrt{d}$ times the full-information regret. Surprisingly, this is shown using "trivial" modifications of standard domains, which have no effect in the full-information setting. This and other results we present highlight some interesting differences between full-information and bandit learning, which were not considered in previous literature.

Includes members:
  Member "bandits with switching costs t 2 3 regret":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "competitive ratio versus regret minimization achieving the best of both worlds")
  Member "volumetric spanners an efficient exploration basis for learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning to route efficiently with end to end feedback the value of networked structure")
  Member "towards minimax policies for online linear optimization with bandit feedback":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "regret bounds for batched bandits")
  Member "on the complexity of bandit and derivative free stochastic convex optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "naive exploration is optimal for online lqr")
  Member "regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi armed bandit problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "multi source domain adaptation for text classification via distancenet bandits")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)