human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "relationships paths and principal matching a new approach to access control"):
  Abstract: Recent work on relationship-based access control has begun to show how it can be applied to general computing systems, as opposed to simply being employed for social networking applications. The use of relationships to determine authorization policies enables more powerful policies to be defined than those based solely on the commonly used concept of role membership. The relationships, paths and principal matching (RPPM) model described here is a formal access control model using relationships and a two-stage request evaluation process. We make use of path conditions, which are similar to regular expressions, to define policies. We then employ non-deterministic finite automata to determine which policies are applicable to a request. The power and robustness of the RPPM model allows us to include contextual information in the authorization process (through the inclusion of logical entities) and allows us to support desirable policy foundations such as separation of duty and Chinese Wall. Additionally, the RPPM model naturally supports a caching mechanism which has significant impact on request evaluation performance.

Includes members:
  Member "caching and auditing in the rppm model":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "path conditions and principal matching a new approach to access control":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "greedy and evolutionary algorithms for mining relationship based access control policies")
  Member "ptacl a language for attribute based access control in open systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a rigorous framework for specification analysis and enforcement of access control policies")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)