human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "an incentive compatible multi armed bandit crowdsourcing mechanism with quality assurance"):
  Abstract: Consider a requester who wishes to crowdsource a series of identical binary labeling tasks to a pool of workers so as to achieve an assured accuracy for each task, in a cost optimal way. The workers are heterogeneous with unknown but fixed qualities and their costs are private. The problem is to select for each task an optimal subset of workers so that the outcome obtained from the selected workers guarantees a target accuracy level. The problem is a challenging one even in a non strategic setting since the accuracy of aggregated label depends on unknown qualities. We develop a novel multi-armed bandit (MAB) mechanism for solving this problem. First, we propose a framework, Assured Accuracy Bandit (AAB), which leads to an MAB algorithm, Constrained Confidence Bound for a Non Strategic setting (CCB-NS). We derive an upper bound on the number of time steps the algorithm chooses a sub-optimal set that depends on the target accuracy level and true qualities. A more challenging situation arises when the requester not only has to learn the qualities of the workers but also elicit their true costs. We modify the CCB-NS algorithm to obtain an adaptive exploration separated algorithm which we call { \em Constrained Confidence Bound for a Strategic setting (CCB-S)}. CCB-S algorithm produces an ex-post monotone allocation rule and thus can be transformed into an ex-post incentive compatible and ex-post individually rational mechanism that learns the qualities of the workers and guarantees a given target accuracy level in a cost optimal way. We provide a lower bound on the number of times any algorithm should select a sub-optimal set and we see that the lower bound matches our upper bound upto a constant factor. We provide insights on the practical implementation of this framework through an illustrative example and we show the efficacy of our algorithms through simulations.

Includes members:
  Member "bandits with concave rewards and convex knapsacks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "exploration exploitation in constrained mdps")
  Member "adaptive crowdsourcing algorithms for the bandit survey problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reply supply efficient crowdsourcing when workers do more than answer questions")
  Member "knapsack based optimal policies for budget limited multi armed bandits":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "advances in bandits with knapsacks")
  Member "mechanism design for cost optimal pac learning in the presence of strategic noisy annotators":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a methodology for customizing clinical tests for esophageal cancer based on patient preferences")
  Member "regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi armed bandit problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "multi source domain adaptation for text classification via distancenet bandits")
  Member "dynamic pricing with limited supply":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "advances in bandits with knapsacks")
  Member "truthful mechanisms with implicit payment computation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "incentivizing exploration with selective data disclosure")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)