human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "decoding visemes improving machine lipreading phd thesis"):
  Abstract: Machine lipreading (MLR) is speech recognition from visual cues and a niche research problem in speech processing & computer vision. Current challenges fall into two groups: the content of the video, such as rate of speech or; the parameters of the video recording e.g, video resolution. We show that HD video is not needed to successfully lipread with a computer. The term "viseme" is used in machine lipreading to represent a visual cue or gesture which corresponds to a subgroup of phonemes where the phonemes are visually indistinguishable. A phoneme is the smallest sound one can utter, because there are more phonemes per viseme, maps between units show a many-to-one relationship. Many maps have been presented, we compare these and our results show Lee's is best. We propose a new method of speaker-dependent phoneme-to-viseme maps and compare these to Lee's. Our results show the sensitivity of phoneme clustering and we use our new knowledge to augment a conventional MLR system. It has been observed in MLR, that classifiers need training on test subjects to achieve accuracy. Thus machine lipreading is highly speaker-dependent. Conversely speaker independence is robust classification of non-training speakers. We investigate the dependence of phoneme-to-viseme maps between speakers and show there is not a high variability of visemes, but there is high variability in trajectory between visemes of individual speakers with the same ground truth. This implies a dependency upon the number of visemes within each set for each individual. We show that prior phoneme-to-viseme maps rarely have enough visemes and the optimal size, which varies by speaker, ranges from 11-35. Finally we decode from visemes back to phonemes and into words. Our novel approach uses the optimum range visemes within hierarchical training of phoneme classifiers and demonstrates a significant increase in classification accuracy.

Includes members:
  Member "finding phonemes improving machine lip reading":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "visual speech recognition aligning terminologies for better understanding")
  Member "speaker independent machine lip reading with speaker dependent viseme classifiers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "algorithms that remember model inversion attacks and data protection law")
  Member "which phoneme to viseme maps best improve visual only computer lip reading":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "pushing the boundaries of audiovisual word recognition using residual networks and lstms")
  Member "some observations on computer lip reading moving from the dream to the reality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "phoneme to viseme mappings")
  Member "decoding visemes improving machine lipreading":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "large scale visual speech recognition")
  Member "resolution limits on visual speech recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "can we read speech beyond the lips rethinking roi selection for deep visual speech recognition")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)