human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "impact maturity times and citation time windows the 2 year maximum journal impact factor"):
  Abstract: Journal metrics are employed for the assessment of scientific scholar journals from a general bibliometric perspective. In this context, the Thomson Reuters journal impact factors (JIFs) are the citation-based indicators most used. The 2-year journal impact factor (2-JIF) counts citations to one and two year old articles, while the 5-year journal impact factor (5-JIF) counts citations from one to five year old articles. Nevertheless, these indicators are not comparable among fields of science for two reasons: (i) each field has a different impact maturity time, and (ii) because of systematic differences in publication and citation behavior across disciplines. In fact, the 5-JIF firstly appeared in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) in 2007 with the purpose of making more comparable impacts in fields in which impact matures slowly. However, there is not an optimal fixed impact maturity time valid for all the fields. In some of them two years provides a good performance whereas in others three or more years are necessary. Therefore, there is a problem when comparing a journal from a field in which impact matures slowly with a journal from a field in which impact matures rapidly. In this work, we propose the 2-year maximum journal impact factor (2M-JIF), a new impact indicator that considers the 2-year rolling citation time window of maximum impact instead of the previous 2-year time window. Finally, an empirical application comparing 2-JIF, 5-JIF, and 2M-JIF shows that the maximum rolling target window reduces the between-group variance with respect to the within-group variance in a random sample of about six hundred journals from eight different fields.

Includes members:
  Member "comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a jcr subject categories normalized impact factor":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "publication modalities article in press and open access in relation to journal average citation")
  Member "alternatives to the journal impact factor i3 and the top 10 or top 25 of the most highly cited papers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "evaluating journal quality a review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management")
  Member "source normalized indicators of citation impact an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators")
  Member "central indexes to the citation distribution a complement to the h index":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "h α an index to quantify an individual s scientific leadership")
  Member "indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals diversity centrality and citations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "comparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals")
  Member "rivals for the crown reply to opthof and leydesdorff":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators")
  Member "measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators")
  Member "can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal journal citation relations using the journal citation reports":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)