human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "simple executions of snapshot implementations"):
  Abstract: The well known snapshot primitive in concurrent programming allows for n-asynchronous processes to write values to an array of single-writer registers and, for each process, to take a snapshot of these registers. In this paper we provide a formulation of the well known linearizability condition for snapshot algorithms in terms of the existence of certain mathematical functions. In addition, we identify a simplifying property of snapshot implementations we call "schedule-based algorithms". This property is natural to assume in the sense that as far as we know, every published snapshot algorithm is schedule-based. Based on this, we prove that when dealing with schedule-based algorithms, it suffices to consider only a small class of very simple executions to prove or disprove correctness in terms of linearizability. We believe that the ideas developed in this paper may help to design automatic verification of snapshot algorithms. Since verifying linearizability was recently proved to be EXPSPACE-complete, focusing on unique objects (snapshot in our case) can potentially lead to designing restricted, but feasible verification methods.

Includes members:
  Member "linearizability is expspace complete":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "linearizability with ownership transfer":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "specifying concurrent programs in separation logic morphisms and simulations")
  Member "linearizable implementations do not suffice for randomized distributed computation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "putting strong linearizability in context preserving hyperproperties in programs that use concurrent objects")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)