human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "end to end learning from spectrum data a deep learning approach for wireless signal identification in spectrum monitoring applications"):
  Abstract: This paper presents end-to-end learning from spectrum data - an umbrella term for new sophisticated wireless signal identification approaches in spectrum monitoring applications based on deep neural networks. End-to-end learning allows to (i) automatically learn features directly from simple wireless signal representations, without requiring design of hand-crafted expert features like higher order cyclic moments, and (ii) train wireless signal classifiers in one end-to-end step which eliminates the need for complex multi-stage machine learning processing pipelines. The purpose of this article is to present the conceptual framework of end-to-end learning for spectrum monitoring and systematically introduce a generic methodology to easily design and implement wireless signal classifiers. Furthermore, we investigate the importance of the choice of wireless data representation to various spectrum monitoring tasks. In particular, two case studies are elaborated (i) modulation recognition and (ii) wireless technology interference detection. For each case study three convolutional neural networks are evaluated for the following wireless signal representations: temporal IQ data, the amplitude/phase representation and the frequency domain representation. From our analysis we prove that the wireless data representation impacts the accuracy depending on the specifics and similarities of the wireless signals that need to be differentiated, with different data representations resulting in accuracy variations of up to 29%. Experimental results show that using the amplitude/phase representation for recognizing modulation formats can lead to performance improvements up to 2% and 12% for medium to high SNR compared to IQ and frequency domain data, respectively. For the task of detecting interference, frequency domain representation outperformed amplitude/phase and IQ data representation up to 20%.

Includes members:
  Member "electrosense open and big spectrum data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a survey on machine learning based performance improvement of wireless networks phy mac and network layer")
  Member "deep learning models for wireless signal classification with distributed low cost spectrum sensors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey on machine learning based performance improvement of wireless networks phy mac and network layer")
  Member "an introduction to deep learning for the physical layer":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a survey on machine learning based performance improvement of wireless networks phy mac and network layer")
  Member "spectrum monitoring for radar bands using deep convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a survey on machine learning based performance improvement of wireless networks phy mac and network layer")
  Member "wireless interference identification with convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a survey on machine learning based performance improvement of wireless networks phy mac and network layer")
  Member "hardware accelerated sdr platform for adaptive air interfaces":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "software defined radios architecture state of the art and challenges")
  Member "will sdn be part of 5g":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "blockchain for 5g and beyond networks a state of the art survey")
  Member "deepsense a unified deep learning framework for time series mobile sensing data processing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "patdnn achieving real time dnn execution on mobile devices with pattern based weight pruning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture)