human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "simple deterministic algorithms for fully dynamic maximal matching"):
  Abstract: A maximal matching can be maintained in fully dynamic (supporting both addition and deletion of edges) $n$-vertex graphs using a trivial deterministic algorithm with a worst-case update time of O(n). No deterministic algorithm that outperforms the na\"{\i}ve O(n) one was reported up to this date. The only progress in this direction is due to Ivkovi\'{c} and Lloyd \cite{IL93}, who in 1993 devised a deterministic algorithm with an \emph{amortized} update time of $O((n+m)^{\sqrt{2}/2})$, where $m$ is the number of edges. #R##N#In this paper we show the first deterministic fully dynamic algorithm that outperforms the trivial one. Specifically, we provide a deterministic \emph{worst-case} update time of $O(\sqrt{m})$. Moreover, our algorithm maintains a matching which is in fact a 3/2-approximate maximum cardinality matching (MCM). We remark that no fully dynamic algorithm for maintaining $(2-\eps)$-approximate MCM improving upon the na\"{\i}ve O(n) was known prior to this work, even allowing amortized time bounds and \emph{randomization}. #R##N#For low arboricity graphs (e.g., planar graphs and graphs excluding fixed minors), we devise another simple deterministic algorithm with \emph{sub-logarithmic update time}. Specifically, it maintains a fully dynamic maximal matching with amortized update time of $O(\log n/\log \log n)$. This result addresses an open question of Onak and Rubinfeld \cite{OR10}. #R##N#We also show a deterministic algorithm with optimal space usage, that for arbitrary graphs maintains a maximal matching in amortized $O(\sqrt{m})$ time, and uses only $O(n+m)$ space.

Includes members:
  Member "fully dynamic maximal matching in o log n update time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "coarse grained complexity for dynamic algorithms")
  Member "dynamic ordered sets with exponential search trees":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "improved dynamic graph coloring")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)