human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "adaptive statistical learning with bayesian differential privacy"):
  Abstract: In statistical learning, a dataset is often partitioned into two parts: the training set and the holdout (i.e., testing) set. For instance, the training set is used to learn a predictor, and then the holdout set is used for estimating the accuracy of the predictor on the true distribution. However, often in practice, the holdout dataset is reused and the estimates tested on the holdout dataset are chosen adaptively based on the results of prior estimates, leading to that the predictor may become dependent of the holdout set. Hence, overfitting may occur, and the learned models may not generalize well to the unseen datasets. Prior studies have established connections between the stability of a learning algorithm and its ability to generalize, but the traditional generalization is not robust to adaptive composition. Recently, Dwork et al. in NIPS, STOC, and Science 2015 show that the holdout dataset from i.i.d. data samples can be reused in adaptive statistical learning, if the estimates are perturbed and coordinated using techniques developed for differential privacy, which is a widely used notion to quantify privacy. Yet, the results of Dwork et al. are applicable to only the case of i.i.d. samples. In contrast, correlations between data samples exist because of various behavioral, social, and genetic relationships between users. Our results in adaptive statistical learning generalize the results of Dwork et al. for i.i.d. data samples to arbitrarily correlated data. Specifically, we show that the holdout dataset from correlated samples can be reused in adaptive statistical learning, if the estimates are perturbed and coordinated using techniques developed for Bayesian differential privacy, which is a privacy notion recently introduced by Yang et al. in SIGMOD 2015 to broaden the application scenarios of differential privacy when data records are correlated.

Includes members:
  Member "composition properties of inferential privacy for time series data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "location trace privacy under conditional priors")
  Member "privtree a differentially private algorithm for hierarchical decompositions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "privgen preserving privacy of sequences through data generation")
  Member "typicality based stability and privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a necessary and sufficient stability notion for adaptive generalization")
  Member "pufferfish privacy mechanisms for correlated data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "minimax rates of estimating approximate differential privacy")
  Member "adaptive learning with robust generalization guarantees":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "max information differential privacy and post selection hypothesis testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "the ladder a reliable leaderboard for machine learning competitions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "do imagenet classifiers generalize to imagenet")
  Member "generalization in adaptive data analysis and holdout reuse":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)