human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "measuring social media activity of scientific literature an exhaustive comparison of scopus and novel altmetrics big data"):
  Abstract: This paper measures social media activity of 15 broad scientific disciplines indexed in Scopus database using Altmetric.com data. First, the presence of Altmetric.com data in Scopus database is investigated, overall and across disciplines. Second, the correlation between the bibliometric and altmetric indices is examined using Spearman correlation. Third, a zero-truncated negative binomial model is used to determine the association of various factors with increasing or decreasing citations. Lastly, the effectiveness of altmetric indices to identify publications with high citation impact is comprehensively evaluated by deploying Area Under the Curve (AUC) - an application of receiver operating characteristic. Results indicate a rapid increase in the presence of Altmetric.com data in Scopus database from 10.19% in 2011 to 20.46% in 2015. A zero-truncated negative binomial model is implemented to measure the extent to which different bibliometric and altmetric factors contribute to citation counts. Blog count appears to be the most important factor increasing the number of citations by 38.6% in the field of Health Professions and Nursing, followed by Twitter count increasing the number of citations by 8% in the field of Physics and Astronomy. Interestingly, both Blog count and Twitter count always show positive increase in the number of citations across all fields. While there was a positive weak correlation between bibliometric and altmetric indices, the results show that altmetric indices can be a good indicator to discriminate highly cited publications, with an encouragingly AUC= 0.725 between highly cited publications and total altmetric count. Overall, findings suggest that altmetrics could better distinguish highly cited publications.

Includes members:
  Member "altmetrics of altmetrics using google scholar twitter mendeley facebook google plus citeulike blogs and wiki":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "scholarly use of social media and altmetrics a review of the literature":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the stability of twitter metrics a study on unavailable twitter mentions of scientific publications")
  Member "do altmetrics correlate with citations extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the stability of twitter metrics a study on unavailable twitter mentions of scientific publications")
  Member "how well developed are altmetrics a cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the stability of twitter metrics a study on unavailable twitter mentions of scientific publications")
  Member "tweeting biomedicine an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies an empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the uk research excellence framework ref")
  Member "coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies an empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the uk research excellence framework ref")
  Member "beyond citations scholars visibility on the social web":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "author level metrics in the new academic profile platforms the online behaviour of the bibliometrics community")
  Member "altmetrics in the wild using social media to explore scholarly impact":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "readership data and research impact")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)