human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the use of application scanners in software product quality assessment"):
  Abstract: Software development needs continuous quality control for a timely detection and removal of quality problems. This includes frequent quality assessments, which need to be automated as far as possible to be feasible. One way of automation in assessing the security of software are application scanners that test an executing software for vulnerabilities. At present, common quality assessments do not integrate such scanners for giving an overall quality statement. This paper presents an integration of application scanners into a general quality assessment method based on explicit quality models and Bayesian nets. Its applicability and the detection capabilities of common scanners are investigated in a case study with two open-source web shops.

Includes members:
  Member "a bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity based quality models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "operationalised product quality models and assessment")
  Member "a bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity based quality models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "operationalised product quality models and assessment")
  Member "tool support for continuous quality control":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "evaluating maintainability prejudices with a large scale study of open source projects")
  Member "a comprehensive model of usability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity based quality models")
  Member "an activity based quality model for maintainability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "evaluating maintainability prejudices with a large scale study of open source projects")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)