human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a nearly optimal and agnostic algorithm for properly learning a mixture of k gaussians for any constant k"):
  Abstract: Learning a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is a fundamental problem in machine learning, learning theory, and statistics. One notion of learning a GMM is proper learning: here, the goal is to find a mixture of $k$ Gaussians $\mathcal{M}$ that is close to the density $f$ of the unknown distribution from which we draw samples. The distance between $\mathcal{M}$ and $f$ is typically measured in the total variation or $L_1$-norm. #R##N#We give an algorithm for learning a mixture of $k$ univariate Gaussians that is nearly optimal for any fixed $k$. The sample complexity of our algorithm is $\tilde{O}(\frac{k}{\epsilon^2})$ and the running time is $(k \cdot \log\frac{1}{\epsilon})^{O(k^4)} + \tilde{O}(\frac{k}{\epsilon^2})$. It is well-known that this sample complexity is optimal (up to logarithmic factors), and it was already achieved by prior work. However, the best known time complexity for proper learning a $k$-GMM was $\tilde{O}(\frac{1}{\epsilon^{3k-1}})$. In particular, the dependence between $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ and $k$ was exponential. We significantly improve this dependence by replacing the $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ term with a $\log \frac{1}{\epsilon}$ while only increasing the exponent moderately. Hence, for any fixed $k$, the $\tilde{O} (\frac{k}{\epsilon^2})$ term dominates our running time, and thus our algorithm runs in time which is nearly-linear in the number of samples drawn. Achieving a running time of $\textrm{poly}(k, \frac{1}{\epsilon})$ for proper learning of $k$-GMMs has recently been stated as an open problem by multiple researchers, and we make progress on this question. #R##N#Moreover, our approach offers an agnostic learning guarantee: our algorithm returns a good GMM even if the distribution we are sampling from is not a mixture of Gaussians. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first agnostic proper learning algorithm for GMMs.

Includes members:
  Member "sparse solutions to nonnegative linear systems and applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "learning mixtures of gaussians in high dimensions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "monotone probability distributions over the boolean cube can be learned with sublinear samples")
  Member "sample optimal density estimation in nearly linear time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning structured distributions from untrusted batches faster and simpler")
  Member "tight bounds for learning a mixture of two gaussians":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "em algorithm is sample optimal for learning mixtures of well separated gaussians")
  Member "smoothed analysis of tensor decompositions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "improper learning for non stochastic control")
  Member "faster and sample near optimal algorithms for proper learning mixtures of gaussians":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "the more the merrier the blessing of dimensionality for learning large gaussian mixtures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "em algorithm is sample optimal for learning mixtures of well separated gaussians")
  Member "efficient density estimation via piecewise polynomial approximation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "em algorithm is sample optimal for learning mixtures of well separated gaussians")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)