human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the computational complexity of dominance and consistency in cp nets"):
  Abstract: We investigate the computational complexity of testing dominance and consistency in CP-nets. Previously, the complexity of dominance has been determined for restricted classes in which the dependency graph of the CP-net is acyclic. However, there are preferences of interest that define cyclic dependency graphs; these are modeled with general CP-nets. In our main results, we show here that both dominance and consistency for general CP-nets are PSPACE-complete. We then consider the concept of strong dominance, dominance equivalence and dominance incomparability, and several notions of optimality, and identify the complexity of the corresponding decision problems. The reductions used in the proofs are from STRIPS planning, and thus reinforce the earlier established connections between both areas.

Includes members:
  Member "introducing variable importance tradeoffs into cp nets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "an approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems")
  Member "reasoning about soft constraints and conditional preferences complexity results and approximation techniques":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "rank pruning for dominance queries in cp nets")
  Member "on graphical modeling of preference and importance":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "norm conflict resolution in stochastic domains")
  Member "cp nets a tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "on validating repairing and refining heuristic ml explanations")
  Member "structure and complexity in planning with unary operators":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a complete parameterized complexity analysis of bounded planning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)