human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "algebraic codes for slepian wolf code design"):
  Abstract: Practical constructions of lossless distributed source codes (for the Slepian-Wolf problem) have been the subject of much investigation in the past decade. In particular, near-capacity achieving code designs based on LDPC codes have been presented for the case of two binary sources, with a binary-symmetric correlation. However, constructing practical codes for the case of non-binary sources with arbitrary correlation remains by and large open. From a practical perspective it is also interesting to consider coding schemes whose performance remains robust to uncertainties in the joint distribution of the sources. #R##N#In this work we propose the usage of Reed-Solomon (RS) codes for the asymmetric version of this problem. We show that algebraic soft-decision decoding of RS codes can be used effectively under certain correlation structures. In addition, RS codes offer natural rate adaptivity and performance that remains constant across a family of correlation structures with the same conditional entropy. The performance of RS codes is compared with dedicated and rate adaptive multistage LDPC codes (Varodayan et al. '06), where each LDPC code is used to compress the individual bit planes. Our simulations show that in classical Slepian-Wolf scenario, RS codes outperform both dedicated and rate-adaptive LDPC codes under $q$-ary symmetric correlation, and are better than rate-adaptive LDPC codes in the case of sparse correlation models, where the conditional distribution of the sources has only a few dominant entries. In a feedback scenario, the performance of RS codes is comparable with both designs of LDPC codes. Our simulations also demonstrate that the performance of RS codes in the presence of inaccuracies in the joint distribution of the sources is much better as compared to multistage LDPC codes.

Includes members:
  Member "source coding with side information using list decoding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hiding symbols and functions new metrics and constructions for information theoretic security")
  Member "improved compression of network coding vectors using erasure decoding and list decoding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "network coding with random packet index assignment for data collection networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)