human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "solve select scale a three step process for sparse signal estimation"):
  Abstract: In the theory of compressed sensing (CS), the sparsity $\|x\|_0$ of the unknown signal $\mathbf{x} \in \mathcal{R}^n$ is of prime importance and the focus of reconstruction algorithms has mainly been either $\|x\|_0$ or its convex relaxation (via $\|x\|_1$). However, it is typically unknown in practice and has remained a challenge when nothing about the size of the support is known. As pointed recently, $\|x\|_0$ might not be the best metric to minimize directly, both due to its inherent complexity as well as its noise performance. Recently a novel stable measure of sparsity $s(\mathbf{x}) := \|\mathbf{x}\|_1^2/\|\mathbf{x}\|_2^2$ has been investigated by Lopes \cite{Lopes2012}, which is a sharp lower bound on $\|\mathbf{x}\|_0$. The estimation procedure for this measure uses only a small number of linear measurements, does not rely on any sparsity assumptions, and requires very little computation. The usage of the quantity $s(\mathbf{x})$ in sparse signal estimation problems has not received much importance yet. We develop the idea of incorporating $s(\mathbf{x})$ into the signal estimation framework. We also provide a three step algorithm to solve problems of the form $\mathbf{Ax=b}$ with no additional assumptions on the original signal $\mathbf{x}$.

Includes members:
  Member "estimating unknown sparsity in compressed sensing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "compressive spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks")
  Member "performance analysis of sparse recovery based on constrained minimal singular values":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sparse recovery based on q ratio constrained minimal singular values")
  Member "comparing measures of sparsity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "concise explanations of neural networks using adversarial training")
  Member "non negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "disentangling overlapping beliefs by structured matrix factorization")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)