human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "can ai generate love advice toward neural answer generation for non factoid questions"):
  Abstract: Deep learning methods that extract answers for non-factoid questions from QA sites are seen as critical since they can assist users in reaching their next decisions through conversations with AI systems. The current methods, however, have the following two problems: (1) They can not understand the ambiguous use of words in the questions as word usage can strongly depend on the context (e.g. the word “relationship” has quite different meanings in the categories of Love advice and other categories). As a result, the accuracies of their answer selections are not good enough. (2) The current methods can only select from among the answers held by QA sites and can not generate new ones. Thus, they can not answer the questions that are somewhat different with those stored in QA sites. Our solution, Neural Answer Construction Model, tackles these problems as it: (1) Incorporates the biases of semantics behind questions (e.g. categories assigned to questions) into word embeddings while also computing them regardless of the semantics. As a result, it can extract answers that suit the contexts of words used in the question as well as following the common usage of words across semantics. This improves the accuracy of answer selection. (2) Uses biLSTM to compute the embeddings of questions as well as those of the sentences often used to form answers (e.g. sentences representing conclusions or those supplementing the conclusions). It then simultaneously learns the optimum combination of those sentences as well as the closeness between the question and those sentences. As a result, our model can construct an answer that corresponds to the situation that underlies the question; it fills the gap between answer selection and generation and is the first model to move beyond the current simple answer selection model for non-factoid QAs. Evaluations using datasets created for love advice stored in the Japanese QA site, Oshiete goo, indicate that our model achieves 20 % higher accuracy in answer creation than the strong baselines. Our model is practical and has already been applied to the love advice service in Oshiete goo.

Includes members:
  Member "applying deep learning to answer selection a study and an open task":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hybrid tiled convolutional neural networks for text sentiment classification")
  Member "joint word representation learning using a corpus and a semantic lexicon":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a common semantic space for monolingual and cross lingual meta embeddings")
  Member "batch normalization accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "selective weak supervision for neural information retrieval")
  Member "a neural conversational model":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "attention over parameters for dialogue systems")
  Member "lstm based deep learning models for non factoid answer selection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "multi level head wise match and aggregation in transformer for textual sequence matching")
  Member "deep learning for answer sentence selection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a study on efficiency accuracy and document structure for answer sentence selection")
  Member "distributed representations of sentences and documents":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)