human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the complexity of nash equilibria in simple stochastic multiplayer games"):
  Abstract: We analyse the computational complexity of finding Nash equilibria in simple stochastic multiplayer games. We show that restricting the search space to equilibria whose payoffs fall into a certain interval may lead to undecidability. In particular, we prove that the following problem is undecidable: Given a game $\mathcal G$, does there exist a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium of $\mathcal G$ where player 0 wins with probability 1. Moreover, this problem remains undecidable if it is restricted to strategies with (unbounded) finite memory. However, if mixed strategies are allowed, decidability remains an open problem. One way to obtain a provably decidable variant of the problem is to restrict the strategies to be positional or stationary. For the complexity of these two problems, we obtain a common lower bound of NP and upper bounds of NP and  PSpace  respectively.

Includes members:
  Member "solving simple stochastic games with few random vertices":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "synthesising strategy improvement and recursive algorithms for solving 2 5 player parity games")
  Member "decision problems for nash equilibria in stochastic games":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "multi objective model checking of markov decision processes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the probabilistic model checker storm")
  Member "settling the complexity of computing two player nash equilibria":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning zero sum simultaneous move markov games using function approximation and correlated equilibrium")
  Member "complexity results about nash equilibria":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "inference based strategy alignment for general sum differential games")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)