human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "measuring and understanding sensory representations within deep networks using a numerical optimization framework"):
  Abstract: A central challenge in sensory neuroscience is describing how the activity of populations of neurons can represent useful features of the external environment. However, while neurophysiologists have long been able to record the responses of neurons in awake, behaving animals, it is another matter entirely to say what a given neuron does. A key problem is that in many sensory domains, the space of all possible stimuli that one might encounter is effectively infinite; in vision, for instance, natural scenes are combinatorially complex, and an organism will only encounter a tiny fraction of possible stimuli. As a result, even describing the response properties of sensory neurons is difficult, and investigations of neuronal functions are almost always critically limited by the number of stimuli that can be considered. In this paper, we propose a closed-loop, optimization-based experimental framework for characterizing the response properties of sensory neurons, building on past efforts in closed-loop experimental methods, and leveraging recent advances in artificial neural networks to serve as as a proving ground for our techniques. Specifically, using deep convolutional neural networks, we asked whether modern black-box optimization techniques can be used to interrogate the "tuning landscape" of an artificial neuron in a deep, nonlinear system, without imposing significant constraints on the space of stimuli under consideration. We introduce a series of measures to quantify the tuning landscapes, and show how these relate to the performances of the networks in an object recognition task. To the extent that deep convolutional neural networks increasingly serve as de facto working hypotheses for biological vision, we argue that developing a unified approach for studying both artificial and biological systems holds great potential to advance both fields together.

Includes members:
  Member "going deeper with convolutions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "very deep convolutional networks for large scale image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "deep learning face representation by joint identification verification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "adaptive deep metric embeddings for person re identification under occlusions")
  Member "convolutional kernel networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "why do deep residual networks generalize better than deep feedforward networks a neural tangent kernel perspective")
  Member "imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "decaf a deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "crl class representative learning for image classification")
  Member "exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "transformation based adversarial video prediction on large scale data")
  Member "unsupervised learning of invariant representations in hierarchical architectures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "learning non parametric invariances from data with permanent random connectomes")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)