human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "learning to cluster in order to transfer across domains and tasks"):
  Abstract: This paper introduces a novel method to perform transfer learning across domains and tasks, formulating it as a problem of learning to cluster. The key insight is that, in addition to features, we can transfer similarity information and this is sufficient to learn a similarity function and clustering network to perform both domain adaptation and cross-task transfer learning. We begin by reducing categorical information to pairwise constraints, which only considers whether two instances belong to the same class or not. This similarity is category-agnostic and can be learned from data in the source domain using a similarity network. We then present two novel approaches for performing transfer learning using this similarity function. First, for unsupervised domain adaptation, we design a new loss function to regularize classification with a constrained clustering loss, hence learning a clustering network with the transferred similarity metric generating the training inputs. Second, for cross-task learning (i.e., unsupervised clustering with unseen categories), we propose a framework to reconstruct and estimate the number of semantic clusters, again using the clustering network. Since the similarity network is noisy, the key is to use a robust clustering algorithm, and we show that our formulation is more robust than the alternative constrained and unconstrained clustering approaches. Using this method, we first show state of the art results for the challenging cross-task problem, applied on Omniglot and ImageNet. Our results show that we can reconstruct semantic clusters with high accuracy. We then evaluate the performance of cross-domain transfer using images from the Office-31 and SVHN-MNIST tasks and present top accuracy on both datasets. Our approach doesn't explicitly deal with domain discrepancy. If we combine with a domain adaptation loss, it shows further improvement.

Includes members:
  Member "adversarial discriminative domain adaptation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "unsupervised multi class domain adaptation theory algorithms and practice")
  Member "asymmetric tri training for unsupervised domain adaptation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "unsupervised domain adaptive object detection using forward backward cyclic adaptation")
  Member "semi supervised kernel metric learning using relative comparisons":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "multi class classification without multi class labels")
  Member "deep transfer learning with joint adaptation networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "unsupervised multi class domain adaptation theory algorithms and practice")
  Member "unsupervised domain adaptation with residual transfer networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "unsupervised multi class domain adaptation theory algorithms and practice")
  Member "learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "deep residual learning for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "batch normalization accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)