human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "synchronization strings explicit constructions local decoding and applications"):
  Abstract: This paper gives new results for synchronization strings, a powerful combinatorial object that allows to efficiently deal with insertions and deletions in various communication settings: #R##N#$\bullet$ We give a deterministic, linear time synchronization string construction, improving over an $O(n^5)$ time randomized construction. Independently of this work, a deterministic $O(n\log^2\log n)$ time construction was just put on arXiv by Cheng, Li, and Wu. We also give a deterministic linear time construction of an infinite synchronization string, which was not known to be computable before. Both constructions are highly explicit, i.e., the $i^{th}$ symbol can be computed in $O(\log i)$ time. #R##N#$\bullet$ This paper also introduces a generalized notion we call long-distance synchronization strings that allow for local and very fast decoding. In particular, only $O(\log^3 n)$ time and access to logarithmically many symbols is required to decode any index. #R##N#We give several applications for these results: #R##N#$\bullet$ For any $\delta 0$ we provide an insdel correcting code with rate $1-\delta-\epsilon$ which can correct any $O(\delta)$ fraction of insdel errors in $O(n\log^3n)$ time. This near linear computational efficiency is surprising given that we do not even know how to compute the (edit) distance between the decoding input and output in sub-quadratic time. We show that such codes can not only efficiently recover from $\delta$ fraction of insdel errors but, similar to [Schulman, Zuckerman; TransInf'99], also from any $O(\delta/\log n)$ fraction of block transpositions and replications. #R##N#$\bullet$ We show that highly explicitness and local decoding allow for infinite channel simulations with exponentially smaller memory and decoding time requirements. These simulations can be used to give the first near linear time interactive coding scheme for insdel errors.

Includes members:
  Member "synchronization strings list decoding for insertions and deletions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "an overview of capacity results for synchronization channels")
  Member "synchronization strings channel simulations and interactive coding for insertions and deletions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "locally decodable codes with randomized encoding")
  Member "synchronization strings efficient and fast deterministic constructions over small alphabets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "locally decodable codes with randomized encoding")
  Member "local list recovery of high rate tensor codes and applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "linear time erasure list decoding of expander codes")
  Member "synchronization strings codes for insertions and deletions approaching the singleton bound":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "locally decodable codes with randomized encoding")
  Member "efficiently decodable insertion deletion codes for high noise and high rate regimes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "locally decodable codes with randomized encoding")
  Member "coding for interactive communication correcting insertions and deletions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "covering codes for insertions and deletions")
  Member "edit distance cannot be computed in strongly subquadratic time unless seth is false":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "streaming with oracle new streaming algorithms for edit distance and lcs")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)