human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "efficient squares and turing universality at temperature 1 with a unique negative glue"):
  Abstract: Is Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM) "powerful?" Well, if certain tiles are required to "cooperate" in order to be able to bind to a growing tile assembly (a.k.a., temperature 2 self-assembly), then Turing universal computation and the efficient self-assembly of $N \times N$ squares is achievable in the aTAM (Rotemund and Winfree, STOC 2000). So yes, in a computational sense, the aTAM is quite powerful! However, if one completely removes this cooperativity condition (a.k.a., temperature 1 self-assembly), then the computational "power" of the aTAM (i.e., its ability to support Turing universal computation and the efficient self-assembly of $N \times N$ squares) becomes unknown. On the plus side, the aTAM, at temperature 1, isn't only Turing universal but also supports the efficient self-assembly $N \times N$ squares if self-assembly is allowed to utilize three spatial dimensions (Fu, Schweller and Cook, SODA 2011). We investigate the theoretical "power" of a seemingly simple, restrictive class of tile assembly systems (TASs) in which (1) the absolute value of every glue strength is 1, (2) there's a single negative strength glue type and (3) unequal glues can't interact. We call these the \emph{restricted glue} TASs (rgTAS). We first show the tile complexity of producing an $N \times N$ square with an rgTAS is $O(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n})$. We also prove that rgTASs are Turing universal with a construction that simulates an arbitrary Turing machine. Next, we provide results for a variation of the rgTAS class, partially restricted glue TASs, which is similar except that the magnitude of the negative glue's strength can only assumed to be $\ge 1$. These results consist of a construction with $O(\log n)$ tile complexity for building $N \times N$ squares, and one which simulates a Turing machine but with a greater scaling factor than for the rgTAS construction.

Includes members:
  Member "intrinsic universality in self assembly":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the non cooperative tile assembly model is not intrinsically universal or capable of bounded turing machine simulation")
  Member "strong fault tolerance for self assembly with fuzzy temperature":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "randomized self assembly for exact shapes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "universal simulation of directed systems in the abstract tile assembly model requires undirectedness")
  Member "strict self assembly of discrete sierpinski triangles":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "geometric tiles and powers and limitations of geometric hindrance in self assembly")
  Member "temperature 1 self assembly deterministic assembly in 3d and probabilistic assembly in 2d":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "limitations of self assembly at temperature 1":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "complexity of self assembled shapes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")
  Member "reducing tile complexity for self assembly through temperature programming":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "self assembly of 4 sided fractals in the two handed tile assembly model")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.ET(Emerging Technologies)