human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "time space trade offs in molecular computation"):
  Abstract: Population protocols are a popular model of distributed computing, in which randomly-interacting agents with little computational power cooperate to jointly perform computational tasks. Inspired by developments in molecular computation, and in particular DNA computing, recent algorithmic work has focused on the complexity of solving simple yet fundamental tasks in the population model, such as leader election (which requires convergence to a single agent in a special "leader" state), and majority (in which agents must converge to a decision as to which of two possible initial states had higher initial count). Known results point towards an inherent trade-off between the time complexity of such algorithms, and the space complexity, i.e. size of the memory available to each agent. #R##N#In this paper, we explore this trade-off and provide new upper and lower bounds for majority and leader election. First, we prove a unified lower bound, which relates the space available per node with the time complexity achievable by a protocol: for instance, our result implies that any protocol solving either of these tasks for $n$ agents using $O( \log \log n )$ states must take $\Omega( n / \rm{polylog} n )$ expected time. This is the first result to characterize time complexity for protocols which employ super-constant number of states per node, and proves that fast, poly-logarithmic running times require protocols to have relatively large space costs. #R##N#On the positive side, we give algorithms showing that fast, poly-logarithmic convergence time can be achieved using $O( \log^2 n )$ space per node, in the case of both tasks. Overall, our results highlight a time complexity separation between $O(\log \log n)$ and $\Theta( \log^2 n )$ state space size for both majority and leader election in population protocols, and introduce new techniques, which should be applicable more broadly.

Includes members:
  Member "plurality consensus via shuffling lessons learned from load balancing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "space optimal majority in population protocols")
  Member "programming discrete distributions with chemical reaction networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "computing with chemical reaction networks a tutorial")
  Member "tight lower bounds for data dependent locality sensitive hashing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "algorithms for similarity search and pseudorandomness")
  Member "stable leader election in population protocols requires linear time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "constructive expressive power of population protocols")
  Member "determining majority in networks with local interactions and very small local memory":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "robust comparison in population protocols")
  Member "timing in chemical reaction networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "communication cost of consensus for nodes with limited memory")
  Member "passively mobile communicating machines that use restricted space":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "robust comparison in population protocols")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)