human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "amortised map inference for image super resolution"):
  Abstract: Image super-resolution (SR) is an underdetermined inverse problem, where a large number of plausible high-resolution images can explain the same downsampled image. Most current single image SR methods use empirical risk minimisation, often with a pixel-wise mean squared error (MSE) loss. However, the outputs from such methods tend to be blurry, over-smoothed and generally appear implausible. A more desirable approach would employ Maximum a Posteriori (MAP) inference, preferring solutions that always have a high probability under the image prior, and thus appear more plausible. Direct MAP estimation for SR is non-trivial, as it requires us to build a model for the image prior from samples. Furthermore, MAP inference is often performed via optimisation-based iterative algorithms which don't compare well with the efficiency of neural-network-based alternatives. Here we introduce new methods for amortised MAP inference whereby we calculate the MAP estimate directly using a convolutional neural network. We first introduce a novel neural network architecture that performs a projection to the affine subspace of valid SR solutions ensuring that the high resolution output of the network is always consistent with the low resolution input. We show that, using this architecture, the amortised MAP inference problem reduces to minimising the cross-entropy between two distributions, similar to training generative models. We propose three methods to solve this optimisation problem: (1) Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) (2) denoiser-guided SR which backpropagates gradient-estimates from denoising to train the network, and (3) a baseline method using a maximum-likelihood-trained image prior. Our experiments show that the GAN based approach performs best on real image data. Lastly, we establish a connection between GANs and amortised variational inference as in e.g. variational autoencoders.

Includes members:
  Member "photo realistic single image super resolution using a generative adversarial network":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "energy based generative adversarial network":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "generating images with perceptual similarity metrics based on deep networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "object centric image generation from layouts")
  Member "improved techniques for training gans":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "densely connected convolutional networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "lossless compression of deep neural networks")
  Member "real time single image and video super resolution using an efficient sub pixel convolutional neural network":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adversarial perturbations prevail in the y channel of the ycbcr color space")
  Member "theano a python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "the deep learning compiler a comprehensive survey")
  Member "unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)