human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a systematic identification and analysis of scientists on twitter"):
  Abstract: Metrics derived from Twitter and other social media—often referred to as altmetrics—are increasingly used to estimate the broader social impacts of scholarship. Such efforts, however, may produce highly misleading results, as the entities that participate in conversations about science on these platforms are largely unknown. For instance, if altmetric activities are generated mainly by scientists, does it really capture broader social impacts of science? Here we present a systematic approach to identifying and analyzing scientists on Twitter. Our method can identify scientists across many disciplines, without relying on external bibliographic data, and be easily adapted to identify other stakeholder groups in science. We investigate the demographics, sharing behaviors, and interconnectivity of the identified scientists. We find that Twitter has been employed by scholars across the disciplinary spectrum, with an over-representation of social and computer and information scientists; under-representation of mathematical, physical, and life scientists; and a better representation of women compared to scholarly publishing. Analysis of the sharing of URLs reveals a distinct imprint of scholarly sites, yet only a small fraction of shared URLs are science-related. We find an assortative mixing with respect to disciplines in the networks between scientists, suggesting the maintenance of disciplinary walls in social media. Our work contributes to the literature both methodologically and conceptually—we provide new methods for disambiguating and identifying particular actors on social media and describing the behaviors of scientists, thus providing foundational information for the construction and use of indicators on the basis of social media metrics.

Includes members:
  Member "differences in personal and professional tweets of scholars":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "scholarly twitter metrics")
  Member "astrophysicists on twitter an in depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behavior":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "scholarly twitter metrics")
  Member "studying social networks at scale macroscopic anatomy of the twitter social graph":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "understanding service integration of online social networks a data driven study")
  Member "do altmetrics correlate with citations extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the stability of twitter metrics a study on unavailable twitter mentions of scientific publications")
  Member "alternative metrics in scientometrics a meta analysis of research into three altmetrics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies an empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the uk research excellence framework ref")
  Member "do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research an overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the stability of twitter metrics a study on unavailable twitter mentions of scientific publications")
  Member "how well developed are altmetrics a cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of alternative metrics in scientific publications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "the stability of twitter metrics a study on unavailable twitter mentions of scientific publications")
  Member "tweeting biomedicine an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies an empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the uk research excellence framework ref")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)