human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "increasing the efficiency of sparse matrix matrix multiplication with a 2 5d algorithm and one sided mpi"):
  Abstract: Matrix-matrix multiplication is a basic operation in linear algebra and an essential building block for a wide range of algorithms in various scientific fields. Theory and implementation for the dense, square matrix case are well-developed. If matrices are sparse, with application-specific sparsity patterns, the optimal implementation remains an open question. Here, we explore the performance of communication reducing 2.5D algorithms and one-sided MPI communication in the context of linear scaling electronic structure theory. In particular, we extend the DBCSR sparse matrix library, which is the basic building block for linear scaling electronic structure theory and low scaling correlated methods in CP2K. The library is specifically designed to efficiently perform block-sparse matrix-matrix multiplication of matrices with a relatively large occupation. Here, we compare the performance of the original implementation based on Cannon's algorithm and MPI point-to-point communication, with an implementation based on MPI one-sided communications (RMA), in both a 2D and a 2.5D approach. The 2.5D approach trades memory and auxiliary operations for reduced communication, which can lead to a speedup if communication is dominant. The 2.5D algorithm is somewhat easier to implement with one-sided communications. A detailed description of the implementation is provided, also for non ideal processor topologies, since this is important for actual applications. Given the importance of the precise sparsity pattern, and even the actual matrix data, which decides the effective fill-in upon multiplication, the tests are performed within the CP2K package with application benchmarks. Results show a substantial boost in performance for the RMA based 2.5D algorithm, up to 1.80x, which is observed to increase with the number of processes involved in the parallelization.

Includes members:
  Member "hypergraph partitioning for sparse matrix matrix multiplication":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a systematic survey of general sparse matrix matrix multiplication")
  Member "locality aware parallel block sparse matrix matrix multiplication using the chunks and tasks programming model":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a systematic survey of general sparse matrix matrix multiplication")
  Member "exploiting multiple levels of parallelism in sparse matrix matrix multiplication":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a systematic survey of general sparse matrix matrix multiplication")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)