human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "decomposition into low rank plus additive matrices for background foreground separation a review for a comparative evaluation with a large scale dataset"):
  Abstract: Recent research on problem formulations based on decomposition into low-rank plus sparse matrices shows a suitable framework to separate moving objects from the background. The most representative problem formulation is the Robust Principal Component Analysis (RPCA) solved via Principal Component Pursuit (PCP) which decomposes a data matrix in a low-rank matrix and a sparse matrix. However, similar robust implicit or explicit decompositions can be made in the following problem formulations: Robust Non-negative Matrix Factorization (RNMF), Robust Matrix Completion (RMC), Robust Subspace Recovery (RSR), Robust Subspace Tracking (RST) and Robust Low-Rank Minimization (RLRM). The main goal of these similar problem formulations is to obtain explicitly or implicitly a decomposition into low-rank matrix plus additive matrices. In this context, this work aims to initiate a rigorous and comprehensive review of the similar problem formulations in robust subspace learning and tracking based on decomposition into low-rank plus additive matrices for testing and ranking existing algorithms for background/foreground separation. For this, we first provide a preliminary review of the recent developments in the different problem formulations which allows us to define a unified view that we called Decomposition into Low-rank plus Additive Matrices (DLAM). Then, we examine carefully each method in each robust subspace learning/tracking frameworks with their decomposition, their loss functions, their optimization problem and their solvers. Furthermore, we investigate if incremental algorithms and real-time implementations can be achieved for background/foreground separation. Finally, experimental results on a large-scale dataset called Background Models Challenge (BMC 2012) show the comparative performance of 32 different robust subspace learning/tracking methods.

Includes members:
  Member "high dimensional low rank plus sparse matrix decomposition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "evolutionary self expressive models for subspace clustering")
  Member "coherence pursuit fast simple and robust principal component analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "inverse transform autoencoder for anomaly detection")
  Member "can dmd obtain a scene background in color":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "efficient background modeling based on sparse representation and outlier iterative removal":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "fast algorithms for robust pca via gradient descent":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on the convergence of stochastic gradient descent with low rank projections for convex low rank matrix problems")
  Member "fast robust pca on graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "predicting graph signals using kernel regression where the input signal is agnostic to a graph")
  Member "approximated robust principal component analysis for improved general scene background subtraction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "mpi faun an mpi based framework for alternating updating nonnegative matrix factorization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sustain scalable unsupervised scoring for tensors and its application to phenotyping")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)