human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "settling the query complexity of non adaptive junta testing"):
  Abstract: We prove that any non-adaptive algorithm that tests whether an unknown Boolean function $f: \{0, 1\}^n\to \{0, 1\}$ is a $k$-junta or $\epsilon$-far from every $k$-junta must make $\widetilde{\Omega}(k^{3/2} / \epsilon)$ many queries for a wide range of parameters $k$ and $\epsilon$. Our result dramatically improves previous lower bounds from [BGSMdW13, STW15], and is essentially optimal given Blais's non-adaptive junta tester from [Blais08], which makes $\widetilde{O}(k^{3/2})/\epsilon$ queries. Combined with the adaptive tester of [Blais09] which makes $O(k\log k + k /\epsilon)$ queries, our result shows that adaptivity enables polynomial savings in query complexity for junta testing.

Includes members:
  Member "testing unateness of real valued functions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "almost optimal testers for concise representations")
  Member "a widetilde o n non adaptive tester for unateness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "almost optimal testers for concise representations")
  Member "a polynomial lower bound for testing monotonicity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "almost optimal testers for concise representations")
  Member "boolean function monotonicity testing requires almost n 1 2 non adaptive queries":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "almost optimal testers for concise representations")
  Member "new algorithms and lower bounds for monotonicity testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "almost optimal testers for concise representations")
  Member "a o n monotonicity tester for boolean functions over the hypercube":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "almost optimal testers for concise representations")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)