human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "optimal schemes for discrete distribution estimation under locally differential privacy"):
  Abstract: We consider the minimax estimation problem of a discrete distribution with support size $k$ under privacy constraints. A privatization scheme is applied to each raw sample independently, and we need to estimate the distribution of the raw samples from the privatized samples. A positive number $\epsilon$ measures the privacy level of a privatization scheme. For a given $\epsilon,$ we consider the problem of constructing optimal privatization schemes with $\epsilon$-privacy level, i.e., schemes that minimize the expected estimation loss for the worst-case distribution. Two schemes in the literature provide order optimal performance in the high privacy regime where $\epsilon$ is very close to $0,$ and in the low privacy regime where $e^{\epsilon}\approx k,$ respectively. #R##N#In this paper, we propose a new family of schemes which substantially improve the performance of the existing schemes in the medium privacy regime when $1\ll e^{\epsilon} \ll k.$ More concretely, we prove that when $3.8 < \epsilon <\ln(k/9) ,$ our schemes reduce the expected estimation loss by $50\%$ under $\ell_2^2$ metric and by $30\%$ under $\ell_1$ metric over the existing schemes. We also prove a lower bound for the region $e^{\epsilon} \ll k,$ which implies that our schemes are order optimal in this regime.

Includes members:
  Member "mutual information optimally local private discrete distribution estimation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a workload adaptive mechanism for linear queries under local differential privacy")
  Member "rappor randomized aggregatable privacy preserving ordinal response":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "extremal mechanisms for local differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a workload adaptive mechanism for linear queries under local differential privacy")
  Member "universally utility maximizing privacy mechanisms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "guidelines for implementing and auditing differentially private systems")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)