human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deep convolutional networks for pancreas segmentation in ct imaging"):
  Abstract: Automatic organ segmentation is an important prerequisite for many computer-aided diagnosis systems. The high anatomical variability of organs in the abdomen, such as the pancreas, prevents many segmentation methods from achieving high accuracies when compared to state-of-the-art segmentation of organs like the liver, heart or kidneys. Recently, the availability of large annotated training sets and the accessibility of affordable parallel computing resources via GPUs have made it feasible for "deep learning" methods such as convolutional networks (ConvNets) to succeed in image classification tasks. These methods have the advantage that used classification features are trained directly from the imaging data.     We present a fully-automated bottom-up method for pancreas segmentation in computed tomography (CT) images of the abdomen. The method is based on hierarchical coarse-to-fine classification of local image regions (superpixels). Superpixels are extracted from the abdominal region using Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC). An initial probability response map is generated, using patch-level confidences and a two-level cascade of random forest classifiers, from which superpixel regions with probabilities larger 0.5 are retained. These retained superpixels serve as a highly sensitive initial input of the pancreas and its surroundings to a ConvNet that samples a bounding box around each superpixel at different scales (and random non-rigid deformations at training time) in order to assign a more distinct probability of each superpixel region being pancreas or not.     We evaluate our method on CT images of 82 patients (60 for training, 2 for validation, and 20 for testing). Using ConvNets we achieve maximum Dice scores of an average 68% ± 10% (range, 43-80%) in testing. This shows promise for accurate pancreas segmentation, using a deep learning approach and compares favorably to state-of-the-art methods.

Includes members:
  Member "one weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "communication optimization strategies for distributed deep learning a survey")
  Member "detection of sclerotic spine metastases via random aggregation of deep convolutional neural network classifications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "deep learning in bioinformatics")
  Member "a new 2 5d representation for lymph node detection using random sets of deep convolutional neural network observations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "lesion harvester iteratively mining unlabeled lesions and hard negative examples at scale")
  Member "a bottom up approach for automatic pancreas segmentation in abdominal ct scans":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "mcmc guided cnn training and segmentation for pancreas extraction")
  Member "visualizing and understanding convolutional networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "improving neural networks by preventing co adaptation of feature detectors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "hyper parameter optimization a review of algorithms and applications")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)