human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "short dot computing large linear transforms distributedly using coded short dot products"):
  Abstract: Faced with saturation of Moore's law and increasing dimension of data, system designers have increasingly resorted to parallel and distributed computing. However, distributed computing is often bottle necked by a small fraction of slow processors called "stragglers" that reduce the speed of computation because the fusion node has to wait for all processors to finish. To combat the effect of stragglers, recent literature introduces redundancy in computations across processors, e.g.,~using repetition-based strategies or erasure codes. The fusion node can exploit this redundancy by completing the computation using outputs from only a subset of the processors, ignoring the stragglers. In this paper, we propose a novel technique -- that we call "Short-Dot" -- to introduce redundant computations in a coding theory inspired fashion, for computing linear transforms of long vectors. Instead of computing long dot products as required in the original linear transform, we construct a larger number of redundant and short dot products that can be computed faster and more efficiently at individual processors. In reference to comparable schemes that introduce redundancy to tackle stragglers, Short-Dot reduces the cost of computation, storage and communication since shorter portions are stored and computed at each processor, and also shorter portions of the input is communicated to each processor. We demonstrate through probabilistic analysis as well as experiments that Short-Dot offers significant speed-up compared to existing techniques. We also derive trade-offs between the length of the dot-products and the resilience to stragglers (number of processors to wait for), for any such strategy and compare it to that achieved by our strategy.

Includes members:
  Member "codenet training large scale neural networks in presence of soft errors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the optimal recovery threshold of coded matrix multiplication")
  Member "speeding up distributed machine learning using codes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "gcsa codes with noise alignment for secure coded multi party batch matrix multiplication")
  Member "fundamental limits of coded linear transform":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "gcsa codes with noise alignment for secure coded multi party batch matrix multiplication")
  Member "a unified coded deep neural network training strategy based on generalized polydot codes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "gcsa codes with noise alignment for secure coded multi party batch matrix multiplication")
  Member "straggler mitigation in distributed matrix multiplication fundamental limits and optimal coding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "gcsa codes with noise alignment for secure coded multi party batch matrix multiplication")
  Member "on the optimal recovery threshold of coded matrix multiplication":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "gcsa codes with noise alignment for secure coded multi party batch matrix multiplication")
  Member "coded sparse matrix multiplication":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "gcsa codes with noise alignment for secure coded multi party batch matrix multiplication")
  Member "straggler mitigation by delayed relaunch of tasks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "codenet training large scale neural networks in presence of soft errors")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)