human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "photo filter recommendation by category aware aesthetic learning"):
  Abstract: Nowadays, social media has become a popular platform for the public to share photos. To make photos more visually appealing, users usually apply filters on their photos without domain knowledge. However, due to the growing number of filter types, it becomes a major issue for users to choose the best filter type. For this purpose, filter recommendation for photo aesthetics takes an important role in image quality ranking problems. In these years, several works have declared that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) outperform traditional methods in image aesthetic categorization, which classifies images into high or low quality. Most of them do not consider the effect on filtered images; hence, we propose a novel image aesthetic learning for filter recommendation. Instead of binarizing image quality, we adjust the state-of-the-art CNN architectures and design a pairwise loss function to learn the embedded aesthetic responses in hidden layers for filtered images. Based on our pilot study, we observe image categories (e.g., portrait, landscape, food) will affect user preference on filter selection. We further integrate category classification into our proposed aesthetic-oriented models. To the best of our knowledge, there is no public dataset for aesthetic judgment with filtered images. We create a new dataset called Filter Aesthetic Comparison Dataset (FACD). It contains 28,160 filtered images based on the AVA dataset and 42,240 reliable image pairs with aesthetic annotations using Amazon Mechanical Turk. It is the first dataset containing filtered images and user preference labels. We conduct experiments on the collected FACD for filter recommendation, and the results show that our proposed category-aware aesthetic learning outperforms aesthetic classification methods (e.g., 12% relative improvement).

Includes members:
  Member "fast r cnn":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "faster r cnn towards real time object detection with region proposal networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "going deeper with convolutions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "very deep convolutional networks for large scale image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "caffe convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "learning fine grained image similarity with deep ranking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "deep metric learning using triplet network":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "opengan open set generative adversarial networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)