human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "automatic visual theme discovery from joint image and text corpora"):
  Abstract: A popular approach to semantic image understanding is to manually tag images with keywords and then learn a mapping from vi- sual features to keywords. Manually tagging images is a subjective pro- cess and the same or very similar visual contents are often tagged with different keywords. Furthermore, not all tags have the same descriptive power for visual contents and large vocabulary available from natural language could result in a very diverse set of keywords. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised visual theme discovery framework as a better (more compact, efficient and effective) alternative to semantic represen- tation of visual contents. We first show that tag based annotation lacks consistency and compactness for describing visually similar contents. We then learn the visual similarity between tags based on the visual features of the images containing the tags. At the same time, we use a natural language processing technique (word embedding) to measure the seman- tic similarity between tags. Finally, we cluster tags into visual themes based on their visual similarity and semantic similarity measures using a spectral clustering algorithm. We conduct user studies to evaluate the effectiveness and rationality of the visual themes discovered by our unsu- pervised algorithm and obtains promising result. We then design three common computer vision tasks, example based image search, keyword based image search and image labelling to explore potential applica- tion of our visual themes discovery framework. In experiments, visual themes significantly outperforms tags on semantic image understand- ing and achieve state-of-art performance in all three tasks. This again demonstrate the effectiveness and versatility of proposed framework.

Includes members:
  Member "automatic concept discovery from parallel text and visual corpora":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "image captioning with unseen objects")
  Member "selecting relevant web trained concepts for automated event retrieval":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "image to video domain adaptation using web supervision")
  Member "very deep convolutional networks for large scale image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "neural codes for image retrieval":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "multi source domain adaptation for text classification via distancenet bandits")
  Member "from captions to visual concepts and back":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "object centric image generation from layouts")
  Member "word2vec explained deriving mikolov et al s negative sampling word embedding method":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "convergence of end to end training in deep unsupervised contrasitive learning")
  Member "conceptlearner discovering visual concepts from weakly labeled image collections":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "weakly supervised segment annotation via expectation kernel density estimation")
  Member "distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)