human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the price of order"):
  Abstract: We present tight bounds on the spanning ratio of a large family of ordered $\theta$-graphs. A $\theta$-graph partitions the plane around each vertex into $m$ disjoint cones, each having aperture $\theta = 2 \pi/m$. An ordered $\theta$-graph is constructed by inserting the vertices one by one and connecting each vertex to the closest previously-inserted vertex in each cone. We show that for any integer $k \geq 1$, ordered $\theta$-graphs with $4k + 4$ cones have a tight spanning ratio of $1 + 2 \sin(\theta/2) / (\cos(\theta/2) - \sin(\theta/2))$. We also show that for any integer $k \geq 2$, ordered $\theta$-graphs with $4k + 2$ cones have a tight spanning ratio of $1 / (1 - 2 \sin(\theta/2))$. We provide lower bounds for ordered $\theta$-graphs with $4k + 3$ and $4k + 5$ cones. For ordered $\theta$-graphs with $4k + 2$ and $4k + 5$ cones these lower bounds are strictly greater than the worst case spanning ratios of their unordered counterparts. These are the first results showing that ordered $\theta$-graphs have worse spanning ratios than unordered $\theta$-graphs. Finally, we show that, unlike their unordered counterparts, the ordered $\theta$-graphs with 4, 5, and 6 cones are not spanners.

Includes members:
  Member "the θ 5 graph is a spanner":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "maximum matchings and minimum blocking sets in θ 6 graphs")
  Member "theta 3 is connected":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "expected complexity of routing in theta 6 and half theta 6 graphs")
  Member "towards tight bounds on theta graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "expected complexity of routing in theta 6 and half theta 6 graphs")
  Member "optimal local routing on delaunay triangulations defined by empty equilateral triangles":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "routing in histograms")
  Member "on the stretch factor of the theta 4 graph":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "routing in polygonal domains")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CG(Computational Geometry)