human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation"):
  Abstract: The combination of argumentation and probability paves the way to new accounts of qualitative and quantitative uncertainty, thereby offering new theoretical and applicative opportunities. Due to a variety of interests, probabilistic argumentation is approached in the literature with different frameworks, pertaining to structured and abstract argumentation, and with respect to diverse types of uncertainty, in particular the uncertainty on the credibility of the premises, the uncertainty about which arguments to consider, and the uncertainty on the acceptance status of arguments or statements. Towards a general framework for probabilistic argumentation, we investigate a labelling-oriented framework encompassing a basic setting for rule-based argumentation and its (semi-) abstract account, along with diverse types of uncertainty. Our framework provides a systematic treatment of various kinds of uncertainty and of their relationships and allows us to back or question assertions from the literature.

Includes members:
  Member "formulating semantics of probabilistic argumentation by characterizing subgraphs theory and empirical results":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a preliminary report on probabilistic attack normal form for constellation semantics")
  Member "probabilistic argumentation an equational approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the attack as strong negation part i")
  Member "probabilistic argumentation with epistemic extensions and incomplete information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches")
  Member "afra argumentation framework with recursive attacks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments")
  Member "chr prism based probabilistic logic learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "an operational semantics for the cognitive architecture act r and its translation to constraint handling rules")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)