human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "exploring the bounds of the utility of context for object detection"):
  Abstract: The recurring context in which objects appear holds valuable information that can be employed to predict their existence. This intuitive observation indeed led many researchers to endow appearance-based detectors with explicit reasoning about context. The underlying thesis suggests that stronger contextual relations would facilitate greater improvements in detection capacity. In practice, however, the observed improvement in many cases is modest at best, and often only marginal. In this work we seek to improve our understanding of this phenomenon, in part by pursuing an opposite approach. Instead of attempting to improve detection scores by employing context, we treat the utility of context as an optimization problem: to what extent can detection scores be improved by considering context or any other kind of additional information? With this approach we explore the bounds on improvement by using contextual relations between objects and provide a tool for identifying the most helpful ones. We show that simple co-occurrence relations can often provide large gains, while in other cases a significant improvement is simply impossible or impractical with either co-occurrence or more precise spatial relations. To better understand these results we then analyze the ability of context to handle different types of false detections, revealing that tested contextual information cannot ameliorate localization errors, severely limiting its gains. These and additional insights further our understanding on where and why utilization of context for object detection succeeds and fails.

Includes members:
  Member "inner scene similarities as a contextual cue for object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "seeing without looking contextual rescoring of object detections for ap maximization")
  Member "understanding the effective receptive field in deep convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "joint anchor feature refinement for real time accurate object detection in images and videos")
  Member "deep feature based contextual model for object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "object detection with convolutional neural networks")
  Member "ssd single shot multibox detector":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "speed accuracy trade offs for modern convolutional object detectors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "progressive gradient pruning for classification detection and domainadaptation")
  Member "the role of context selection in object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "context aware zero shot learning for object recognition")
  Member "attentive contexts for object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "eleatt rnn adding attentiveness to neurons in recurrent neural networks")
  Member "inside outside net detecting objects in context with skip pooling and recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)