human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "incremental sequence learning"):
  Abstract: Deep learning research over the past years has shown that by increasing the scope or difficulty of the learning problem over time, increasingly complex learning problems can be addressed. We study incremental learning in the context of sequence learning, using generative RNNs in the form of multi-layer recurrent Mixture Density Networks. While the potential of incremental or curriculum learning to enhance learning is known, indiscriminate application of the principle does not necessarily lead to improvement, and it is essential therefore to know which forms of incremental or curriculum learning have a positive effect. This research contributes to that aim by comparing three instantiations of incremental or curriculum learning.#N##N#We introduce Incremental Sequence Learning, a simple incremental approach to sequence learning. Incremental Sequence Learning starts out by using only the first few steps of each sequence as training data. Each time a performance criterion has been reached, the length of the parts of the sequences used for training is increased.#N##N#We introduce and make available a novel sequence learning task and data set: predicting and classifying MNIST pen stroke sequences. We find that Incremental Sequence Learning greatly speeds up sequence learning and reaches the best test performance level of regular sequence learning 20 times faster, reduces the test error by 74%, and in general performs more robustly; it displays lower variance and achieves sustained progress after all three comparison methods have stopped improving. The other instantiations of curriculum learning do not result in any noticeable improvement. A trained sequence prediction model is also used in transfer learning to the task of sequence classification, where it is found that transfer learning realizes improved classification performance compared to methods that learn to classify from scratch.

Includes members:
  Member "sim to real robot learning from pixels with progressive nets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "deep drone racing from simulation to reality with domain randomization")
  Member "on large batch training for deep learning generalization gap and sharp minima":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "communication optimization strategies for distributed deep learning a survey")
  Member "a critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "ten social dimensions of conversations and relationships")
  Member "actor mimic deep multitask and transfer reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "review analyze and design a comprehensive deep reinforcement learning framework")
  Member "deep residual learning for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "scheduled sampling for sequence prediction with recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "videoflow a conditional flow based model for stochastic video generation")
  Member "generating sequences with recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "representation learning a review and new perspectives":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "nestedvae isolating common factors via weak supervision")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)