human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "fast locality sensitive hashing for approximate near neighbor search"):
  Abstract: The Indyk-Motwani Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH) framework (STOC 1998) is a general technique for constructing a data structure to answer approximate near neighbor queries by using a distribution $\mathcal{H}$ over locality-sensitive hash functions that partition space. For a collection of $n$ points, after preprocessing, the query time is dominated by $O(n^{\rho} \log n)$ evaluations of hash functions from $\mathcal{H}$ and $O(n^{\rho})$ hash table lookups and distance computations where $\rho \in (0,1)$ is determined by the locality-sensitivity properties of $\mathcal{H}$. It follows from a recent result by Dahlgaard et al. (FOCS 2017) that the number of locality-sensitive hash functions can be reduced to $O(\log^2 n)$, leaving the query time to be dominated by $O(n^{\rho})$ distance computations and $O(n^{\rho} \log n)$ additional word-RAM operations. We state this result as a general framework and provide a simpler analysis showing that the number of lookups and distance computations closely match the Indyk-Motwani framework, making it a viable replacement in practice. Using ideas from another locality-sensitive hashing framework by Andoni and Indyk (SODA 2006) we are able to reduce the number of additional word-RAM operations to $O(n^\rho)$.

Includes members:
  Member "fast similarity sketching":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "algorithms for similarity search and pseudorandomness")
  Member "scalable and robust set similarity join":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "blocking and filtering techniques for entity resolution a survey")
  Member "fast cross polytope locality sensitive hashing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "algorithms for similarity search and pseudorandomness")
  Member "optimal hashing based time space trade offs for approximate near neighbors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "on the i o complexity of the k nearest neighbor problem")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)