human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "compressive hyperspectral imaging via approximate message passing"):
  Abstract: We consider a compressive hyperspectral imaging reconstruction problem, where three-dimensional spatio-spectral information about a scene is sensed by a coded aperture snapshot spectral imager (CASSI). The CASSI imaging process can be modeled as suppressing three-dimensional coded and shifted voxels and projecting these onto a two-dimensional plane, such that the number of acquired measurements is greatly reduced. On the other hand, because the measurements are highly compressive, the reconstruction process becomes challenging. We previously proposed a compressive imaging reconstruction algorithm that is applied to two-dimensional images based on the approximate message passing (AMP) framework. AMP is an iterative algorithm that can be used in signal and image reconstruction by performing denoising at each iteration. We employed an adaptive Wiener filter as the image denoiser, and called our algorithm “AMP-Wiener.” In this paper, we extend AMP-Wiener to three-dimensional hyperspectral image reconstruction, and call it “AMP-3D-Wiener.” Applying the AMP framework to the CASSI system is challenging, because the matrix that models the CASSI system is highly sparse, and such a matrix is not suitable to AMP and makes it difficult for AMP to converge. Therefore, we modify the adaptive Wiener filter and employ a technique called damping to solve for the divergence issue of AMP. Our approach is applied in nature, and the numerical experiments show that AMP-3D-Wiener outperforms existing widely-used algorithms such as gradient projection for sparse reconstruction (GPSR) and two-step iterative shrinkage/thresholding (TwIST) given a similar amount of runtime. Moreover, in contrast to GPSR and TwIST, AMP-3D-Wiener need not tune any parameters, which simplifies the reconstruction process.

Includes members:
  Member "compressive imaging via approximate message passing with image denoising":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "block coordinate regularization by denoising")
  Member "adaptive damping and mean removal for the generalized approximate message passing algorithm":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "bilinear recovery using adaptive vector amp")
  Member "compressive hyperspectral imaging with side information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "rank minimization for snapshot compressive imaging")
  Member "inference for generalized linear models via alternating directions and bethe free energy minimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "an approximate message passing framework for side information")
  Member "from denoising to compressed sensing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a novel learnable gradient descent type algorithm for non convex non smooth inverse problems")
  Member "sparse estimation with the swept approximated message passing algorithm":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "sparse bayesian learning using approximate message passing with unitary transformation")
  Member "fixed points of generalized approximate message passing with arbitrary matrices":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "bilinear recovery using adaptive vector amp")
  Member "the dynamics of message passing on dense graphs with applications to compressed sensing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "capacity achieving spatially coupled sparse superposition codes with amp decoding")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)