human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "data depth and design learning reliable models for melanoma screening"):
  Abstract: State of the art on melanoma screening evolved rapidly in the last two years, with the adoption of deep learning. Those models, however, pose challenges of their own, as they are expensive to train and difficult to parameterize. Objective: We investigate the methodological issues for designing and evaluating deep learning models for melanoma screening, by exploring nine choices often faced to design deep networks: model architecture, training dataset, image resolution, type of data augmentation, input normalization, use of segmentation, duration of training, additional use of SVM, and test data augmentation. Methods: We perform a two-level full factorial experiment, for five different test datasets, resulting in 2560 exhaustive trials, which we analyze using a multi-way ANOVA. Results: The main finding is that the size of training data has a disproportionate influence, explaining almost half the variation in performance. Of the other factors, test data augmentation and input resolution are the most helpful. Deeper models, when combined, with extra data, also help. We show that the costly full factorial design, or the unreliable sequential optimization, are not the only options: ensembles of models provide reliable results with limited resources. Conclusions and Significance: To move research forward on automated melanoma screening, we need to curate larger shared datasets. Optimizing hyperparameters and measuring performance on the same dataset is common, but leads to overoptimistic results. Ensembles of models are a cost-effective alternative to the expensive full-factorial and to the unstable sequential designs.

Includes members:
  Member "knowledge transfer for melanoma screening with deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "3d medical image segmentation with labeled and unlabeled data using autoencoders at the example of liver segmentation in ct images")
  Member "a survey on deep learning in medical image analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "medgan medical image translation using gans")
  Member "deep learning ensembles for melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "assessing robustness of deep learning methods in dermatological workflow")
  Member "inception v4 inception resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "stem seg spatio temporal embeddings for instance segmentation in videos")
  Member "identity mappings in deep residual networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")
  Member "u net convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)