human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on the utility of context or the lack thereof for object detection"):
  Abstract: The recurring context in which objects appear holds valuable information that can be employed to predict their existence. This intuitive observation indeed led many researchers to endow appearance-based detectors with explicit reasoning about context. The underlying thesis suggests that with stronger contextual relations, the better improvement in detection capacity one can expect from such a combined approach. In practice, however, the observed improvement in many case is modest at best, and often only marginal. In this work we seek to understand this phenomenon better, in part by pursuing an opposite approach. Instead of going from context to detection score, we formulate the score as a function of standard detector results and contextual relations, an approach that allows to treat the utility of context as an optimization problem in order to obtain the largest gain possible from considering context in the first place. Analyzing different contextual relations reveals the most helpful ones and shows that in many cases including context can help while in other cases a significant improvement is simply impossible or impractical. To better understand these results we then analyze the ability of context to handle different types of false detections, revealing that contextual information cannot ameliorate localization errors, which in turn also diminish the observed improvement obtained by correcting other types of errors. These insights provide further explanations and better understanding regarding the success or failure of utilizing context for object detection.

Includes members:
  Member "speed accuracy trade offs for modern convolutional object detectors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "progressive gradient pruning for classification detection and domainadaptation")
  Member "the role of context selection in object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "context aware zero shot learning for object recognition")
  Member "attentive contexts for object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "eleatt rnn adding attentiveness to neurons in recurrent neural networks")
  Member "inside outside net detecting objects in context with skip pooling and recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "faster r cnn towards real time object detection with region proposal networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "very deep convolutional networks for large scale image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)