human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "polynomial bottleneck congestion games with optimal price of anarchy"):
  Abstract: We study {\em bottleneck congestion games} where the social cost is determined by the worst congestion of any resource. These games directly relate to network routing problems and also job-shop scheduling problems. In typical bottleneck congestion games, the utility costs of the players are determined by the worst congested resources that they use. However, the resulting Nash equilibria are inefficient, since the price of anarchy is proportional on the number of resources which can be high. Here we show that we can get smaller price of anarchy with the bottleneck social cost metric. We introduce the {\em polynomial bottleneck games} where the utility costs of the players are polynomial functions of the congestion of the resources that they use. In particular, the delay function for any resource $r$ is $C_{r}^\M$, where $C_r$ is the congestion measured as the number of players that use $r$, and $\M \geq 1$ is an integer constant that defines the degree of the polynomial. The utility cost of a player is the sum of the individual delays of the resources that it uses. The social cost of the game remains the same, namely, it is the worst bottleneck resource congestion: $\max_{r} C_r$. We show that polynomial bottleneck games are very efficient and give price of anarchy $O(|R|^{1/(\M+1)})$, where $R$ is the set of resources. This price of anarchy is tight, since we demonstrate a game with price of anarchy $\Omega(|R|^{1/(\M+1)})$, for any $\M \geq 1$. We obtain our tight bounds by using two proof techniques: {\em transformation}, which we use to convert arbitrary games to simpler games, and {\em expansion}, which we use to bound the price of anarchy in a simpler game.

Includes members:
  Member "bottleneck congestion games with logarithmic price of anarchy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "routing games with progressive filling")
  Member "strong nash equilibria in games with the lexicographical improvement property":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "congestion games with mixed objectives")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)