human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "an approach to the author citation potential measures of scientific performance which are invariant across scientific fields"):
  Abstract: The citation potential is a measure of the probability of being cited. Obviously, it is different among fields of science, social science, and humanities because of systematic differences in publication and citation behaviour across disciplines. In the past, the citation potential was studied at journal level considering the average number of references in established groups of journals (for example, the crown indicator is based on the journal subject categories in the Web of Science database). In this paper, some characterizations of the author?s scientific research through three different research dimensions are proposed: production (journal papers), impact (journal citations), and reference (bibliographical sources). Then, we propose different measures of the citation potential for authors based on a proportion of these dimensions. An empirical application, in a set of 120 randomly selected highly productive authors from the CSIC Research Centre (Spain) in four subject areas, shows that the ratio between production and impact dimensions is a normalized measure of the citation potential at the level of individual authors. Moreover, this ratio reduces the between-group variance in relation to the within-group variance in a higher proportion than the rest of the indicators analysed. Furthermore, it is consistent with the type of journal impact indicator used. A possible application of this result is in the selection and promotion process within interdisciplinary institutions, since it allows comparisons of authors based on their particular scientific research.

Includes members:
  Member "journal topic citation potential and between field comparisons the topic normalized impact factor":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "field normalization of scientometric indicators")
  Member "impact maturity times and citation time windows the 2 year maximum journal impact factor":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators")
  Member "comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a jcr subject categories normalized impact factor":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "publication modalities article in press and open access in relation to journal average citation")
  Member "alternatives to the journal impact factor i3 and the top 10 or top 25 of the most highly cited papers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "evaluating journal quality a review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management")
  Member "source normalized indicators of citation impact an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators")
  Member "central indexes to the citation distribution a complement to the h index":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "h α an index to quantify an individual s scientific leadership")
  Member "caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the cwts leiden evaluations of research performance":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators")
  Member "indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals diversity centrality and citations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "comparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)