human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "resolution and relevance trade offs in deep learning"):
  Abstract: Deep learning has been successfully applied to various tasks, but its underlying mechanism remains unclear. Neural networks associate similar inputs in the visible layer to the same state of hidden variables in deep layers. The fraction of inputs that are associated to the same state is a natural measure of similarity and is simply related to the cost in bits required to represent these inputs. The degeneracy of states with the same information cost provides instead a natural measure of noise and is simply related the entropy of the frequency of states, that we call relevance. Representations with minimal noise, at a given level of similarity (resolution), are those that maximise the relevance. A signature of such efficient representations is that frequency distributions follow power laws. We show, in extensive numerical experiments, that deep neural networks extract a hierarchy of efficient representations from data, because they i) achieve low levels of noise (i.e. high relevance) and ii) exhibit power law distributions. We also find that the layer that is most efficient to reliably generate patterns of training data is the one for which relevance and resolution are traded at the same price, which implies that frequency distribution follows Zipf's law.

Includes members:
  Member "opening the black box of deep neural networks via information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the information bottleneck problems models connections applications and information theoretic views")
  Member "representation learning a review and new perspectives":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "nestedvae isolating common factors via weak supervision")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)