human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a random matrix approach to differential privacy and structure preserved social network graph publishing"):
  Abstract: Online social networks are being increasingly used for analyzing various societal phenomena such as epidemiology, information dissemination, marketing and sentiment flow. Popular analysis techniques such as clustering and influential node analysis, require the computation of eigenvectors of the real graph's adjacency matrix. Recent de-anonymization attacks on Netflix and AOL datasets show that an open access to such graphs pose privacy threats. Among the various privacy preserving models, Differential privacy provides the strongest privacy guarantees. #R##N#In this paper we propose a privacy preserving mechanism for publishing social network graph data, which satisfies differential privacy guarantees by utilizing a combination of theory of random matrix and that of differential privacy. The key idea is to project each row of an adjacency matrix to a low dimensional space using the random projection approach and then perturb the projected matrix with random noise. We show that as compared to existing approaches for differential private approximation of eigenvectors, our approach is computationally efficient, preserves the utility and satisfies differential privacy. We evaluate our approach on social network graphs of Facebook, Live Journal and Pokec. The results show that even for high values of noise variance sigma=1 the clustering quality given by normalized mutual information gain is as low as 0.74. For influential node discovery, the propose approach is able to correctly recover 80 of the most influential nodes. We also compare our results with an approach presented in [43], which directly perturbs the eigenvector of the original data by a Laplacian noise. The results show that this approach requires a large random perturbation in order to preserve the differential privacy, which leads to a poor estimation of eigenvectors for large social networks.

Includes members:
  Member "privacy via the johnson lindenstrauss transform":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "interpretable and differentially private predictions")
  Member "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "the johnson lindenstrauss transform itself preserves differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "crypt epsilon crypto assisted differential privacy on untrusted servers")
  Member "beyond worst case analysis in private singular vector computation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "pd ml lite private distributed machine learning from lighweight cryptography")
  Member "defining and evaluating network communities based on ground truth":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "certified robustness of community detection against adversarial structural perturbation via randomized smoothing")
  Member "de anonymizing social networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "knowledge graphs")
  Member "a tutorial on spectral clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "approximating spectral clustering via sampling a review")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)