human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the performance of orthogonal multi matching pursuit under rip"):
  Abstract: The orthogonal multi-matching pursuit (OMMP) is a natural extension of orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP). We denote the OMMP with the parameter $M$ as OMMP(M) where $M\geq 1$ is an integer. The main difference between OMP and OMMP(M) is that OMMP(M) selects $M$ atoms per iteration, while OMP only adds one atom to the optimal atom set. In this paper, we study the performance of orthogonal multi-matching pursuit (OMMP) under RIP. In particular, we show that, when the measurement matrix A satisfies $(9s, 1/10)$-RIP, there exists an absolutely constant $M_0\leq 8$ so that OMMP(M_0) can recover $s$-sparse signal within $s$ iterations. We furthermore prove that, for slowly-decaying $s$-sparse signal, OMMP(M) can recover s-sparse signal within $O(\frac{s}{M})$ iterations for a large class of $M$. In particular, for $M=s^a$ with $a\in [0,1/2]$, OMMP(M) can recover slowly-decaying $s$-sparse signal within $O(s^{1-a})$ iterations. The result implies that OMMP can reduce the computational complexity heavily.

Includes members:
  Member "a remark on the restricted isometry property in orthogonal matching pursuit":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "progressive stochastic greedy sparse reconstruction and support selection")
  Member "improved rip analysis of orthogonal matching pursuit":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "when does omp achieve support recovery with continuous dictionaries")
  Member "sparse recovery with orthogonal matching pursuit under rip":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "efficient active learning of sparse halfspaces with arbitrary bounded noise")
  Member "new bounds for restricted isometry constants":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the use of mutual coherence to prove ell 1 ell 0 equivalence in classification problems")
  Member "subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "compressive sensing for cut improvement and local clustering")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)