human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "learning geometric concepts with nasty noise"):
  Abstract: We study the efficient learnability of geometric concept classes - specifically, low-degree polynomial threshold functions (PTFs) and intersections of halfspaces - when a fraction of the data is adversarially corrupted. We give the first polynomial-time PAC learning algorithms for these concept classes with dimension-independent error guarantees in the presence of nasty noise under the Gaussian distribution. In the nasty noise model, an omniscient adversary can arbitrarily corrupt a small fraction of both the unlabeled data points and their labels. This model generalizes well-studied noise models, including the malicious noise model and the agnostic (adversarial label noise) model. Prior to our work, the only concept class for which efficient malicious learning algorithms were known was the class of origin-centered halfspaces. #R##N#Specifically, our robust learning algorithm for low-degree PTFs succeeds under a number of tame distributions -- including the Gaussian distribution and, more generally, any log-concave distribution with (approximately) known low-degree moments. For LTFs under the Gaussian distribution, we give a polynomial-time algorithm that achieves error $O(\epsilon)$, where $\epsilon$ is the noise rate. At the core of our PAC learning results is an efficient algorithm to approximate the low-degree Chow-parameters of any bounded function in the presence of nasty noise. To achieve this, we employ an iterative spectral method for outlier detection and removal, inspired by recent work in robust unsupervised learning. Our aforementioned algorithm succeeds for a range of distributions satisfying mild concentration bounds and moment assumptions. The correctness of our robust learning algorithm for intersections of halfspaces makes essential use of a novel robust inverse independence lemma that may be of broader interest.

Includes members:
  Member "being robust in high dimensions can be practical":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "private mean estimation of heavy tailed distributions")
  Member "robustly learning a gaussian getting optimal error efficiently":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "prophet inequalities with linear correlations and augmentations")
  Member "statistical query lower bounds for robust estimation of high dimensional gaussians and gaussian mixtures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning structured distributions from untrusted batches faster and simpler")
  Member "robust estimators in high dimensions without the computational intractability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "complexity theoretic limitations on learning halfspaces":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "time space tradeoffs for distinguishing distributions and applications to security of goldreich s prg")
  Member "a ptas for agnostically learning halfspaces":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "efficient active learning of sparse halfspaces with arbitrary bounded noise")
  Member "the power of localization for efficiently learning linear separators with noise":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "efficient active learning of sparse halfspaces with arbitrary bounded noise")
  Member "the average sensitivity of an intersection of half spaces":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "top down induction of decision trees rigorous guarantees and inherent limitations")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)