human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a near optimal algorithm for l1 difference"):
  Abstract: We give the first L_1-sketching algorithm for integer vectors which produces nearly optimal sized sketches in nearly linear time. This answers the first open problem in the list of open problems from the 2006 IITK Workshop on Algorithms for Data Streams. Specifically, suppose Alice receives a vector x in {-M,...,M}^n and Bob receives y in {-M,...,M}^n, and the two parties share randomness. Each party must output a short sketch of their vector such that a third party can later quickly recover a (1 +/- eps)-approximation to ||x-y||_1 with 2/3 probability given only the sketches. We give a sketching algorithm which produces O(eps^{-2}log(1/eps)log(nM))-bit sketches in O(n*log^2(nM)) time, independent of eps. The previous best known sketching algorithm for L_1 is due to [Feigenbaum et al., SICOMP 2002], which achieved the optimal sketch length of O(eps^{-2}log(nM)) bits but had a running time of O(n*log(nM)/eps^2). Notice that our running time is near-linear for every eps, whereas for sufficiently small values of eps, the running time of the previous algorithm can be as large as quadratic. Like their algorithm, our sketching procedure also yields a small-space, one-pass streaming algorithm which works even if the entries of x,y are given in arbitrary order.

Includes members:
  Member "fuzzy extractors how to generate strong keys from biometrics and other noisy data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a capacity achieving one message key agreement with finite blocklength analysis")
  Member "revisiting norm estimation in data streams":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "optimal error pseudodistributions for read once branching programs")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)