human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "sparsity lower bounds for dimensionality reducing maps"):
  Abstract: We give near-tight lower bounds for the sparsity required in several dimensionality reducing linear maps. First, consider the JL lemma which states that for any set of n vectors in R there is a matrix A in R^{m x d} with m = O(eps^{-2}log n) such that mapping by A preserves pairwise Euclidean distances of these n vectors up to a 1 +/- eps factor. We show that there exists a set of n vectors such that any such matrix A with at most s non-zero entries per column must have s = Omega(eps^{-1}log n/log(1/eps)) as long as m < O(n/log(1/eps)). This bound improves the lower bound of Omega(min{eps^{-2}, eps^{-1}sqrt{log_m d}}) by [Dasgupta-Kumar-Sarlos, STOC 2010], which only held against the stronger property of distributional JL, and only against a certain restricted class of distributions. Meanwhile our lower bound is against the JL lemma itself, with no restrictions. Our lower bound matches the sparse Johnson-Lindenstrauss upper bound of [Kane-Nelson, SODA 2012] up to an O(log(1/eps)) factor. #R##N#Next, we show that any m x n matrix with the k-restricted isometry property (RIP) with constant distortion must have at least Omega(klog(n/k)) non-zeroes per column if the number of the rows is the optimal value m = O(klog (n/k)), and if k < n/polylog n. This improves the previous lower bound of Omega(min{k, n/m}) by [Chandar, 2010] and shows that for virtually all k it is impossible to have a sparse RIP matrix with an optimal number of rows. #R##N#Lastly, we show that any oblivious distribution over subspace embedding matrices with 1 non-zero per column and preserving all distances in a d dimensional-subspace up to a constant factor with constant probability must have at least Omega(d^2) rows. This matches one of the upper bounds in [Nelson-Nguyen, 2012] and shows the impossibility of obtaining the best of both of constructions in that work, namely 1 non-zero per column and \~O(d) rows.

Includes members:
  Member "low rank approximation and regression in input sparsity time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing")
  Member "osnap faster numerical linear algebra algorithms via sparser subspace embeddings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing")
  Member "low distortion subspace embeddings in input sparsity time and applications to robust linear regression":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing")
  Member "lower bounds for sparse recovery":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "querying a matrix through matrix vector products")
  Member "a sparse johnson lindenstrauss transform":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the effectiveness of johnson lindenstrauss transform for high dimensional optimization with outliers")
  Member "sparser johnson lindenstrauss transforms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing")
  Member "a derandomized sparse johnson lindenstrauss transform":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "distributed learning with sublinear communication")
  Member "new and improved johnson lindenstrauss embeddings via the restricted isometry property":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "finding the mode of a kernel density estimate")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)