human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "sublinear time estimation of degree distribution moments the arboricity connection"):
  Abstract: We revisit the classic problem of estimating the degree distribution moments of an undirected graph. Consider an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with $n$ (non-isolated) vertices, and define (for $s > 0$) $\mu_s = \frac{1}{n}\cdot\sum_{v \in V} d^s_v$. Our aim is to estimate $\mu_s$ within a multiplicative error of $(1+\varepsilon)$ (for a given approximation parameter $\varepsilon>0$) in sublinear time. We consider the sparse graph model that allows access to: uniform random vertices, queries to the degree of any vertex, and queries to a random neighbor of any vertex. Feige (SICOMP 06) and Goldreich-Ron (RSA 08) proved $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ bounds for the $s=1$ case (the average degree). Gonen-Ron-Shavitt (SIDMA 11) extended this result to all integral $s > 0$, by designing an $\widetilde{O}(n^{1-1/(s+1)})$ algorithm. #R##N#We design a new, significantly simpler algorithm for this problem. In the worst-case, it exactly matches the bounds of Gonen-Ron-Shavitt, and has a much simpler proof. More importantly, the running time of this algorithm is connected to the \emph{arboricity} of $G$: the minimum number of forests into which $E$ can be partitioned. For the family of graphs with arboricity at most $\alpha$, it has a query complexity of $\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{n^{1-1/s}}{\mu^{1/s}_s} \Big(\alpha^{1/s} + \min\{\alpha,\mu^{1/s}_s\}\Big)\right) = \widetilde{O}(n^{1-1/s}\alpha/\mu^{1/s}_s)$. Thus, for the class of bounded arboricity graphs (which includes planar graphs, all minor closed families, and preferential attachment graphs), we can estimate the average degree in $\widetilde{O}(1)$ queries, and can estimate the variance of the degree distribution in $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ queries. This is a major improvement over the previous worst-case bounds. Our key insight is that a certain estimator for $\mu_s$ has significantly smaller variance when $G$ does not have large dense subgraphs.

Includes members:
  Member "sublinear time algorithms for counting star subgraphs with applications to join selectivity estimation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "nearly optimal edge estimation with independent set queries")
  Member "algorithmic complexity of power law networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "prsim sublinear time simrank computation on large power law graphs")
  Member "approximately counting triangles in sublinear time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "parallel algorithms for small subgraph counting")
  Member "catching the head tail and everything in between a streaming algorithm for the degree distribution":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "temporal network sampling")
  Member "why do simple algorithms for triangle enumeration work in the real world":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "parallel clique counting and peeling algorithms")
  Member "a near optimal sublinear time algorithm for approximating the minimum vertex cover size":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "complexity and efficient algorithms for data inconsistency evaluating and repairing")
  Member "listing all maximal cliques in sparse graphs in near optimal time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "teaser fast and certifiable point cloud registration")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)