human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "sublogarithmic distributed algorithms for lov asz local lemma and the complexity hierarchy"):
  Abstract: Locally Checkable Labeling (LCL) problems include essentially all the classic problems of $\mathsf{LOCAL}$ distributed algorithms. In a recent enlightening revelation, Chang and Pettie [arXiv 1704.06297] showed that any LCL (on bounded degree graphs) that has an $o(\log n)$-round randomized algorithm can be solved in $T_{LLL}(n)$ rounds, which is the randomized complexity of solving (a relaxed variant of) the Lov\'asz Local Lemma (LLL) on bounded degree $n$-node graphs. Currently, the best known upper bound on $T_{LLL}(n)$ is $O(\log n)$, by Chung, Pettie, and Su [PODC'14], while the best known lower bound is $\Omega(\log\log n)$, by Brandt et al. [STOC'16]. Chang and Pettie conjectured that there should be an $O(\log\log n)$-round algorithm. #R##N#Making the first step of progress towards this conjecture, and providing a significant improvement on the algorithm of Chung et al. [PODC'14], we prove that $T_{LLL}(n)= 2^{O(\sqrt{\log\log n})}$. Thus, any $o(\log n)$-round randomized distributed algorithm for any LCL problem on bounded degree graphs can be automatically sped up to run in $2^{O(\sqrt{\log\log n})}$ rounds. #R##N#Using this improvement and a number of other ideas, we also improve the complexity of a number of graph coloring problems (in arbitrary degree graphs) from the $O(\log n)$-round results of Chung, Pettie and Su [PODC'14] to $2^{O(\sqrt{\log\log n})}$. These problems include defective coloring, frugal coloring, and list vertex-coloring.

Includes members:
  Member "a time hierarchy theorem for the local model":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "distributed graph problems through an automata theoretic lens")
  Member "lopsidependency in the moser tardos framework beyond the lopsided lovasz local lemma":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "deterministic algorithms for the lovasz local lemma simpler more general and more parallel")
  Member "the locality of distributed symmetry breaking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "distributed maximum matching verification in congest")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)