human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "observational equivalence in system estimation contractions in complex networks"):
  Abstract: Observability of complex systems/networks is the focus of this paper, which is shown to be closely related to the concept of contraction. Indeed, for observable network tracking it is necessary/sufficient to have one node in each contraction measured. Therefore, nodes in a contraction are equivalent to recover for loss of observability, implying that contraction size is a key factor for observability recovery. Here, using a polynomial order contraction detection algorithm, we analyze the distribution of contractions, studying its relation with key network properties. Our results show that contraction size is related to network clustering coefficient and degree heterogeneity. Particularly, in networks with power-law degree distribution, if the clustering coefficient is high there are less contractions with smaller size on average. The implication is that estimation/tracking of such systems requires less number of measurements, while their observational recovery is more restrictive in case of sensor failure. Further, in Small-World networks higher degree heterogeneity implies that there are more contractions with smaller size on average. Therefore, the estimation of representing system requires more measurements, and also the recovery of measurement failure is more limited. These results imply that one can tune the properties of synthetic networks to alleviate their estimation/observability recovery.

Includes members:
  Member "sensor selection cost optimisation for tracking structurally cyclic systems a p order solution":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "local rewiring algorithms to increase clustering and grow a small world":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "control principles of complex networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "nonlinearity networks a 2020 vision")
  Member "graph theoretic distributed inference in social networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on the controllability of clustered scale free networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SY(Systems and Control)