human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "typicality based stability and privacy"):
  Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a new notion of algorithmic stability called typical stability. When our goal is to release real-valued queries (statistics) computed over a dataset, this notion does not require the queries to be of bounded sensitivity -- a condition that is generally assumed under a standard notion of algorithmic stability known as differential privacy [DMNS06, Dwo06]. Instead, typical stability requires the output of the query, when computed on a dataset drawn from the underlying distribution, to be "well-concentrated" around its expected value with respect to that distribution. Typical stability can also be motivated as an alternative definition for database privacy (in such case, we call it typical privacy). Like differential privacy, this notion enjoys several important properties including robustness to post-processing and adaptive composition. #R##N#We also discuss the guarantees of typical stability on the generalization error for a broader class of queries than that of bounded-sensitivity queries. This class contains all queries whose output distributions have a "light" tail, e.g., subgaussian and subexponential queries. In particular, we show that if a typically stable interaction with a dataset yields a query from that class, then this query when evaluated on the same dataset will have small generalization error with high probability (i.e., it will not overfit to the dataset). #R##N#We discuss the composition guarantees of typical stability and prove a composition theorem that gives a characterization of the degradation of the parameters of typical stability/privacy under $k$-fold adaptive composition. We also give simple noise-addition algorithms that achieve this notion. These algorithms are similar to their differentially private counterparts, however, the added noise is calibrated differently.

Includes members:
  Member "adaptive learning with robust generalization guarantees":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "max information differential privacy and post selection hypothesis testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "generalization in adaptive data analysis and holdout reuse":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "algorithmic stability for adaptive data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "preserving statistical validity in adaptive data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "reasoning about generalization via conditional mutual information")
  Member "the geometry of differential privacy the sparse and approximate cases":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages")
  Member "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "a learning theory approach to non interactive database privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)