human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "performance analysis of source image estimators in blind source separation"):
  Abstract: Blind methods often separate or identify signals or signal subspaces up to an unknown scaling factor. Sometimes it is necessary to cope with the scaling ambiguity, which can be done through reconstructing signals as they are received by sensors, because scales of the sensor responses (images) have known physical interpretations. In this paper, we analyze two approaches that are widely used for computing the sensor responses, especially, in frequency-domain independent component analysis. One approach is the least-squares projection, whereas the other one assumes a regular mixing matrix and computes its inverse. Both estimators are invariant to the unknown scaling. Although frequently used, their differences were not studied yet. A goal of this paper is to fill this gap. The estimators are compared through a theoretical study, perturbation analysis, and simulations. We point to the fact that the estimators are equivalent when the separated signal subspaces are orthogonal, and vice versa. Two applications are shown, one of which demonstrates a case where the estimators yield substantially different results.

Includes members:
  Member "spatial source subtraction based on incomplete measurements of relative transfer function":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "block online multi channel speech enhancement using dnn supported relative transfer function estimates")
  Member "independent vector analysis identification conditions and performance bounds":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "determining the dimension and structure of the subspace correlated across multiple data sets")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SD(Sound)