human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "improved inception residual convolutional neural network for object recognition"):
  Abstract: Machine learning and computer vision have driven many of the greatest advances in the modeling of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs). Nowadays, most of the research has been focused on improving recognition accuracy with better DCNN models and learning approaches. The recurrent convolutional approach is not applied very much, other than in a few DCNN architectures. On the other hand, Inception-v4 and Residual networks have promptly become popular among computer the vision community. In this paper, we introduce a new DCNN model called the Inception Recurrent Residual Convolutional Neural Network (IRRCNN), which utilizes the power of the Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN), the Inception network, and the Residual network. This approach improves the recognition accuracy of the Inception-residual network with same number of network parameters. In addition, this proposed architecture generalizes the Inception network, the RCNN, and the Residual network with significantly improved training accuracy. We have empirically evaluated the performance of the IRRCNN model on different benchmarks including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, TinyImageNet-200, and CU3D-100. The experimental results show higher recognition accuracy against most of the popular DCNN models including the RCNN. We have also investigated the performance of the IRRCNN approach against the Equivalent Inception Network (EIN) and the Equivalent Inception Residual Network (EIRN) counterpart on the CIFAR-100 dataset. We report around 4.53%, 4.49% and 3.56% improvement in classification accuracy compared with the RCNN, EIN, and EIRN on the CIFAR-100 dataset respectively. Furthermore, the experiment has been conducted on the TinyImageNet-200 and CU3D-100 datasets where the IRRCNN provides better testing accuracy compared to the Inception Recurrent CNN (IRCNN), the EIN, and the EIRN.

Includes members:
  Member "squeezenet alexnet level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and 0 5mb model size":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "lossless compression of deep neural networks")
  Member "inception recurrent convolutional neural network for object recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "advanced deep convolutional neural network approaches for digital pathology image analysis a comprehensive evaluation with different use cases")
  Member "aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")
  Member "identity mappings in deep residual networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")
  Member "cnn architectures for large scale audio classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "multi modal dense video captioning")
  Member "the microsoft 2016 conversational speech recognition system":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "accelerating rnn transducer inference via one step constrained beam search")
  Member "wide residual networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "learning representations by predicting bags of visual words")
  Member "wavenet a generative model for raw audio":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "noise estimation using density estimation for self supervised multimodal learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)