human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a longitudinal assessment of the persistence of twitter datasets"):
  Abstract: With social media datasets being increasingly shared by researchers, it also presents the caveat that those datasets are not always completely replicable. Having to adhere to requirements of platforms like Twitter, researchers cannot release the raw data and instead have to release a list of unique identifiers, which others can then use to recollect the data from the platform themselves. This leads to the problem that subsets of the data may no longer be available, as content can be deleted or user accounts deactivated. To quantify the impact of content deletion in the replicability of datasets in a long term, we perform a longitudinal analysis of the persistence of 30 Twitter datasets, which include over 147 million tweets. Having the original datasets collected between 2012 and 2016, and recollecting them later by using the tweet IDs, we look at four different factors that quantify the extent to which recollected datasets resemble original ones: completeness, representativity, similarity and changingness. Even though the ratio of available tweets keeps decreasing as the dataset gets older, we find that the textual content of the recollected subset is still largely representative of the whole dataset that was originally collected. The representativity of the metadata, however, keeps decreasing over time, both because the dataset shrinks and because certain metadata, such as the users' number of followers, keeps changing. Our study has important implications for researchers sharing and using publicly shared Twitter datasets in their research.

Includes members:
  Member "detection and resolution of rumours in social media a survey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "discover your social identity from what you tweet a content based approach")
  Member "big questions for social media big data representativeness validity and other methodological pitfalls":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "bias in data driven ai systems an introductory survey")
  Member "i wish i didn t say that analyzing and predicting deleted messages in twitter":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "forex trading and twitter spam bots and reputation manipulation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)