human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "long timescale credit assignment in neuralnetworks with external memory"):
  Abstract: Credit assignment in traditional recurrent neural networks usually involves back-propagating through a long chain of tied weight matrices. The length of this chain scales linearly with the number of time-steps as the same network is run at each time-step. This creates many problems, such as vanishing gradients, that have been well studied. In contrast, a NNEM's architecture recurrent activity doesn't involve a long chain of activity (though some architectures such as the NTM do utilize a traditional recurrent architecture as a controller). Rather, the externally stored embedding vectors are used at each time-step, but no messages are passed from previous time-steps. This means that vanishing gradients aren't a problem, as all of the necessary gradient paths are short. However, these paths are extremely numerous (one per embedding vector in memory) and reused for a very long time (until it leaves the memory). Thus, the forward-pass information of each memory must be stored for the entire duration of the memory. This is problematic as this additional storage far surpasses that of the actual memories, to the extent that large memories on infeasible to back-propagate through in high dimensional settings. One way to get around the need to hold onto forward-pass information is to recalculate the forward-pass whenever gradient information is available. However, if the observations are too large to store in the domain of interest, direct reinstatement of a forward pass cannot occur. Instead, we rely on a learned autoencoder to reinstate the observation, and then use the embedding network to recalculate the forward-pass. Since the recalculated embedding vector is unlikely to perfectly match the one stored in memory, we try out 2 approximations to utilize error gradient w.r.t. the vector in memory.

Includes members:
  Member "decoupled neural interfaces using synthetic gradients":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sideways depth parallel training of video models")
  Member "neural turing machines":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "mast a memory augmented self supervised tracker")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)