human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "coloring down 3 2 approximation for special cases of the weighted tree augmentation problem"):
  Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the weighted tree augmentation problem (TAP), where the goal is to augment a tree with a minimum cost set of edges such that the graph becomes two edge connected. First we show that in weighted TAP, we can restrict our attention to trees which are binary and where all the non-tree edges go between two leaves of the tree. We then give two different top-down coloring algorithms. Both algorithms differ from known techniques for a 3/2-approximation in unweighted TAP and current attempts to reach a 3/2-approximation for weighted TAP. #R##N#The first algorithm we describe always gives a 2-approximation for any feasible fractional solution to the natural edge cover LP. When the fractional solution is such that all the edges with non-zero weight are at least $\alpha$, then this algorithm achieves a $2/(1+\alpha)$-approximation. We propose a new conjecture on extreme points of LP relaxations for the problem, which if true, will lead to a constructive proof of an integrality gap of at most 3/2 for weighted TAP. In the second algorithm, we introduce simple valid constraints to the edge cover LP. In this algorithm, we focus on deficient edges, edges covered to an extent less than 4/3 in the fractional solution. We show that for fractional feasible solutions, deficient edges occur in node-disjoint paths in the tree. When the number of such paths is at most two, we give a top-down coloring algorithm which decomposes 3/2 times the fractional solution into a convex combination of integer solutions. We believe our algorithms will be useful in eventually resolving the integrality gap of linear programming formulations for TAP. #R##N#We also investigate a variant of TAP where each edge in the solution must be covered by a cycle of length three. We give a $\Theta(\log n)$-approximation algorithm for this problem in the weighted case and a 4-approximation in the unweighted case.

Includes members:
  Member "a frac 3 2 approximation algorithm for tree augmentation via chvatal gomory cuts":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "improved approximation for tree augmentation saving by rewiring")
  Member "on the tree augmentation problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "2 node connectivity network design")
  Member "improved approximation for weighted tree augmentation with bounded costs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "approximating unweighted tree augmentation via lift and project part i stemless tap":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "a 1 75 lp approximation for the tree augmentation problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "approximating unweighted tree augmentation via lift and project part i stemless tap")
  Member "approximating unweighted tree augmentation via lift and project part ii":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "breaching the 2 approximation barrier for connectivity augmentation a reduction to steiner tree")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)