human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "ccs it s not fair fair schedulers cannot be implemented in ccs like languages even under progress and certain fairness assumptions"):
  Abstract: In the process algebra community it is sometimes suggested that, on some level of abstraction, any distributed system can be modelled in standard process-algebraic specification formalisms like CCS. This sentiment is strengthened by results testifying that CCS, like many similar formalisms, is Turing powerful and provides a mechanism for interaction. This paper counters that sentiment by presenting a simple fair scheduler---one that in suitable variations occurs in many distributed systems---of which no implementation can be expressed in CCS, unless CCS is enriched with a fairness assumption. #R##N#Since Dekker's and Peterson's mutual exclusion protocols implement fair schedulers, it follows that these protocols cannot be rendered correctly in CCS without imposing a fairness assumption. Peterson expressed this algorithm correctly in pseudocode without resorting to a fairness assumption, so it furthermore follows that CCS lacks the expressive power to accurately capture such pseudocode.

Includes members:
  Member "progress fairness and justness in process algebra":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "ensuring liveness properties of distributed systems open problems")
  Member "a process algebra for wireless mesh networks used for modelling verifying and analysing aodv":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ensuring liveness properties of distributed systems open problems")
  Member "musings on encodings and expressiveness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "ensuring liveness properties of distributed systems open problems")
  Member "reactive turing machines":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "toward a uniform theory of effectful state machines")
  Member "abstract processes of place transition systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on characterising distributability")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)