human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "ternary residual networks"):
  Abstract: Sub-8-bit representation of DNNs incur some discernible loss of accuracy despite rigorous (re)training at low-precision. Such loss of accuracy essentially makes them equivalent to a much shallower counterpart, diminishing the power of being deep networks. To address this problem of accuracy drop we introduce the notion of \textit{residual networks} where we add more low-precision edges to sensitive branches of the sub-8-bit network to compensate for the lost accuracy. Further, we present a perturbation theory to identify such sensitive edges. Aided by such an elegant trade-off between accuracy and compute, the 8-2 model (8-bit activations, ternary weights), enhanced by ternary residual edges, turns out to be sophisticated enough to achieve very high accuracy ($\sim 1\%$ drop from our FP-32 baseline), despite $\sim 1.6\times$ reduction in model size, $\sim 26\times$ reduction in number of multiplications, and potentially $\sim 2\times$ power-performance gain comparing to 8-8 representation, on the state-of-the-art deep network ResNet-101 pre-trained on ImageNet dataset. Moreover, depending on the varying accuracy requirements in a dynamic environment, the deployed low-precision model can be upgraded/downgraded on-the-fly by partially enabling/disabling residual connections. For example, disabling the least important residual connections in the above enhanced network, the accuracy drop is $\sim 2\%$ (from FP32), despite $\sim 1.9\times$ reduction in model size, $\sim 32\times$ reduction in number of multiplications, and potentially $\sim 2.3\times$ power-performance gain comparing to 8-8 representation. Finally, all the ternary connections are sparse in nature, and the ternary residual conversion can be done in a resource-constraint setting with no low-precision (re)training.

Includes members:
  Member "mobilenets efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "sharp minima can generalize for deep nets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "bayesian deep learning and a probabilistic perspective of generalization")
  Member "incremental network quantization towards lossless cnns with low precision weights":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "squeezenet alexnet level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and 0 5mb model size":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "lossless compression of deep neural networks")
  Member "finn a framework for fast scalable binarized neural network inference":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sqwa stochastic quantized weight averaging for improving the generalization capability of low precision deep neural networks")
  Member "sep nets small and effective pattern networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "mdinference balancing inference accuracy andlatency for mobile applications")
  Member "dorefa net training low bitwidth convolutional neural networks with low bitwidth gradients":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "learning structured sparsity in deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)