human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deeper deep entity resolution"):
  Abstract: Entity resolution (ER) is a key data integration problem. Despite the efforts in 70+ years in all aspects of ER, there is still a high demand for democratizing ER - humans are heavily involved in labeling data, performing feature engineering, tuning parameters, and defining blocking functions. With the recent advances in deep learning, in particular distributed representation of words (a.k.a. word embeddings), we present a novel ER system, called DeepER, that achieves good accuracy, high efficiency, as well as ease-of-use (i.e., much less human efforts). For accuracy, we use sophisticated composition methods, namely uni- and bi-directional recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with long short term memory (LSTM) hidden units, to convert each tuple to a distributed representation (i.e., a vector), which can in turn be used to effectively capture similarities between tuples. We consider both the case where pre-trained word embeddings are available as well the case where they are not; we present ways to learn and tune the distributed representations. For efficiency, we propose a locality sensitive hashing (LSH) based blocking approach that uses distributed representations of tuples; it takes all attributes of a tuple into consideration and produces much smaller blocks, compared with traditional methods that consider only a few attributes. For ease-of-use, DeepER requires much less human labeled data and does not need feature engineering, compared with traditional machine learning based approaches which require handcrafted features, and similarity functions along with their associated thresholds. We evaluate our algorithms on multiple datasets (including benchmarks, biomedical data, as well as multi-lingual data) and the extensive experimental results show that DeepER outperforms existing solutions.

Includes members:
  Member "data curation with deep learning vision towards self driving data curation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "slide in defense of smart algorithms over hardware acceleration for large scale deep learning systems")
  Member "enriching word vectors with subword information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "when are tree structures necessary for deep learning of representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "description based text classification with reinforcement learning")
  Member "how transferable are features in deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "distributed representations of sentences and documents":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "retrofitting word vectors to semantic lexicons":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "hashing for similarity search a survey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a survey on deep hashing methods")
  Member "a comparison of blocking methods for record linkage":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "blocking and filtering techniques for entity resolution a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)