human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "adversary resistant deep neural networks with an application to malware detection"):
  Abstract: Beyond its highly publicized victories in Go, there have been numerous successful applications of deep learning in information retrieval, computer vision and speech recognition. In cybersecurity, an increasing number of companies have become excited about the potential of deep learning, and have started to use it for various security incidents, the most popular being malware detection. These companies assert that deep learning (DL) could help turn the tide in the battle against malware infections. However, deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial samples, a flaw that plagues most if not all statistical learning models. Recent research has demonstrated that those with malicious intent can easily circumvent deep learning-powered malware detection by exploiting this flaw. #R##N#In order to address this problem, previous work has developed various defense mechanisms that either augmenting training data or enhance model's complexity. However, after a thorough analysis of the fundamental flaw in DNNs, we discover that the effectiveness of current defenses is limited and, more importantly, cannot provide theoretical guarantees as to their robustness against adversarial sampled-based attacks. As such, we propose a new adversary resistant technique that obstructs attackers from constructing impactful adversarial samples by randomly nullifying features within samples. In this work, we evaluate our proposed technique against a real world dataset with 14,679 malware variants and 17,399 benign programs. We theoretically validate the robustness of our technique, and empirically show that our technique significantly boosts DNN robustness to adversarial samples while maintaining high accuracy in classification. To demonstrate the general applicability of our proposed method, we also conduct experiments using the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, generally used in image recognition research.

Includes members:
  Member "adversarial perturbations against deep neural networks for malware classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the security of randomized defenses against adversarial samples")
  Member "unifying adversarial training algorithms with flexible deep data gradient regularization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sok security and privacy in machine learning")
  Member "defensive distillation is not robust to adversarial examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "deepdga adversarially tuned domain generation and detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "inline detection of dga domains using side information")
  Member "deep neural network based malware detection using two dimensional binary program features":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "automatic generation of adversarial examples for interpreting malware classifiers")
  Member "distillation as a defense to adversarial perturbations against deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "malicious behavior detection using windows audit logs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "dynamic malware analysis with feature engineering and feature learning")
  Member "towards deep neural network architectures robust to adversarial examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)