human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "parameterized complexity of maxsat above average"):
  Abstract: In MaxSat, we are given a CNF formula $F$ with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses and asked to find a truth assignment satisfying the maximum number of clauses. Let $r_1,..., r_m$ be the number of literals in the clauses of $F$. Then $asat(F)=\sum_{i=1}^m (1-2^{-r_i})$ is the expected number of clauses satisfied by a random truth assignment (the truth values to the variables are distributed uniformly and independently). It is well-known that, in polynomial time, one can find a truth assignment satisfying at least $asat(F)$ clauses. In the parameterized problem MaxSat-AA, we are to decide whether there is a truth assignment satisfying at least $asat(F)+k$ clauses, where $k$ is the parameter. We prove that MaxSat-AA is para-NP-complete and, thus, MaxSat-AA is not fixed-parameter tractable unless P$=$NP. This is in sharp contrast to MaxLin2-AA which was recently proved to be fixed-parameter tractable by Crowston et al. (arXiv:1104.1135v3). In fact, we consider a more refined version of {\sc MaxSat-AA}, {\sc Max-$r(n)$-Sat-AA}, where $r_j\le r(n)$ for each $j$. Alon {\em et al.} (SODA 2010) proved that if $r=r(n)$ is a constant, then {\sc Max-$r$-Sat-AA} is fixed-parameter tractable. We prove that {\sc Max-$r(n)$-Sat-AA} is para-NP-complete for $r(n)=\lceil \log n\rceil.$ We also prove that assuming the exponential time hypothesis, {\sc Max-$r(n)$-Sat-AA} is not in XP already for any $r(n)\ge \log \log n +\phi(n)$, where $\phi(n)$ is any unbounded strictly increasing function. This lower bound on $r(n)$ cannot be decreased much further as we prove that {\sc Max-$r(n)$-Sat-AA} is (i) in XP for any $r(n)\le \log \log n - \log \log \log n$ and (ii) fixed-parameter tractable for any $r(n)\le \log \log n - \log \log \log n - \phi(n)$, where $\phi(n)$ is any unbounded strictly increasing function. The proof uses some results on {\sc MaxLin2-AA}.

Includes members:
  Member "faster parameterized algorithms using linear programming":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "structural parameterizations with modulator oblivion")
  Member "simultaneously satisfying linear equations over mathbb f _2 maxlin2 and max r lin2 parameterized above average":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "satisfiability of ordering csps above average")
  Member "a new bound for 3 satisfiable maxsat and its algorithmic application":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fixed parameter tractability of satisfying beyond the number of variables")
  Member "on multiway cut parameterized above lower bounds":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "structural parameterizations with modulator oblivion")
  Member "systems of linear equations over mathbb f _2 and problems parameterized above average":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a probabilistic approach to problems parameterized above or below tight bounds")
  Member "a new lower bound on the maximum number of satisfied clauses in max sat and its algorithmic application":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "fixed parameter tractability of satisfying beyond the number of variables")
  Member "a probabilistic approach to problems parameterized above or below tight bounds":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "hamiltonicity below dirac s condition")
  Member "solving max r sat above a tight lower bound":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "domination above r independence does sparseness help")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)