human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "an efficient approach to communication aware path planning for long range surveillance missions undertaken by uavs"):
  Abstract: While using drones for remote surveillance missions, it is mandatory to do path planning of the vehicle since these are pilot-less vehicles. Path planning, whether offline or online, entails setting up the path as a sequence of locations in the 3D Euclidean space, whose coordinates happen to be latitude, longitude and altitude. For the specific application of remote surveillance of long linear infrastructures in non-urban terrain, the continuous 3D-ESP problem practically entails two important scalar costs. The first scalar cost is the distance traveled along the planned path. Since drones are battery operated, hence it is needed that the path length between fixed start and goal locations of a mission should be minimal at all costs. The other scalar cost is the cost of transmitting the acquired video during the mission of remote surveillance, via a camera mounted in the drone's belly. Because of the length of surveillance target which is long linear infrastructure, the amount of video generated is very high and cannot be generally stored in its entirety, on board. If the connectivity is poor along certain segments of a naive path, to boost video transmission rate, the transmission power of the signal is kept high, which in turn dissipates more battery energy. Hence a path is desired that simultaneously also betters what is known as communication cost. These two costs trade-off, and hence Pareto optimization is needed for this 3D bi-objective Euclidean shortest path problem. In this report, we study the mono-objective offline path planning problem, based on the distance cost, while posing the communication cost as an upper-bounded constraint. The bi-objective path planning solution is sketched out towards the end.

Includes members:
  Member "grid based angle constrained path planning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sparse 3d point cloud map upsampling and noise removal as a vslam post processing step experimental evaluation")
  Member "theta any angle path planning on grids":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "path finding for the coalition of co operative agents acting in the environment with destructible obstacles")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.RO(Robotics)