human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the complexity of learning halfspaces using generalized linear methods"):
  Abstract: Many popular learning algorithms (E.g. Regression, Fourier-Transform based algorithms, Kernel SVM and Kernel ridge regression) operate by reducing the problem to a convex optimization problem over a vector space of functions. These methods offer the currently best approach to several central problems such as learning half spaces and learning DNF's. In addition they are widely used in numerous application domains. Despite their importance, there are still very few proof techniques to show limits on the power of these algorithms. #R##N#We study the performance of this approach in the problem of (agnostically and improperly) learning halfspaces with margin $\gamma$. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a distribution over labeled examples. The $\gamma$-margin error of a hyperplane $h$ is the probability of an example to fall on the wrong side of $h$ or at a distance $\le\gamma$ from it. The $\gamma$-margin error of the best $h$ is denoted $\mathrm{Err}_\gamma(\mathcal{D})$. An $\alpha(\gamma)$-approximation algorithm receives $\gamma,\epsilon$ as input and, using i.i.d. samples of $\mathcal{D}$, outputs a classifier with error rate $\le \alpha(\gamma)\mathrm{Err}_\gamma(\mathcal{D}) + \epsilon$. Such an algorithm is efficient if it uses $\mathrm{poly}(\frac{1}{\gamma},\frac{1}{\epsilon})$ samples and runs in time polynomial in the sample size. #R##N#The best approximation ratio achievable by an efficient algorithm is $O\left(\frac{1/\gamma}{\sqrt{\log(1/\gamma)}}\right)$ and is achieved using an algorithm from the above class. Our main result shows that the approximation ratio of every efficient algorithm from this family must be $\ge \Omega\left(\frac{1/\gamma}{\mathrm{poly}\left(\log\left(1/\gamma\right)\right)}\right)$, essentially matching the best known upper bound.

Includes members:
  Member "from average case complexity to improper learning complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "time space tradeoffs for distinguishing distributions and applications to security of goldreich s prg")
  Member "minimizing the misclassification error rate using a surrogate convex loss":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "minimizers of the empirical risk and risk monotonicity")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)