human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "sketching and embedding are equivalent for norms"):
  Abstract: An outstanding open question (Question #5, this http URL) asks to characterize metric spaces in which distances can be estimated using efficient sketches. Specifically, we say that a sketching algorithm is efficient if it achieves constant approximation using constant sketch size. A well-known result of Indyk (J. ACM, 2006) implies that a metric that admits a constant-distortion embedding into $\ell_p$ for $p\in(0,2]$ also admits an efficient sketching scheme. But is the converse true, i.e., is embedding into $\ell_p$ the only way to achieve efficient sketching? #R##N#We address these questions for the important special case of normed spaces, by providing an almost complete characterization of sketching in terms of embeddings. In particular, we prove that a finite-dimensional normed space allows efficient sketches if and only if it embeds (linearly) into $\ell_{1-\varepsilon}$ with constant distortion. We further prove that for norms that are closed under sum-product, efficient sketching is equivalent to embedding into $\ell_1$ with constant distortion. Examples of such norms include the Earth Mover's Distance (specifically its norm variant, called Kantorovich-Rubinstein norm), and the trace norm (a.k.a. Schatten $1$-norm or the nuclear norm). Using known non-embeddability theorems for these norms by Naor and Schechtman (SICOMP, 2007) and by Pisier (Compositio. Math., 1978), we then conclude that these spaces do not admit efficient sketches either, making progress towards answering another open question (Question #7, this http URL). #R##N#Finally, we observe that resolving whether "sketching is equivalent to embedding into $\ell_1$ for general norms" (i.e., without the above restriction) is equivalent to resolving a well-known open problem in Functional Analysis posed by Kwapien in 1969.

Includes members:
  Member "streaming symmetric norms via measure concentration":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing")
  Member "sketching as a tool for numerical linear algebra":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "approximating spectral clustering via sampling a review")
  Member "an optimal lower bound on the communication complexity of gap hamming distance":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "approximate mathbb f _2 sketching of valuation functions")
  Member "a multi round communication lower bound for gap hamming and some consequences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "distributed data summarization in well connected networks")
  Member "optimal lower bounds for locality sensitive hashing except when q is tiny":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a survey on deep hashing methods")
  Member "better gap hamming lower bounds via better round elimination":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "some bounds on communication complexity of gap hamming distance")
  Member "planar earthmover is not in l_1":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "scalable nearest neighbor search for optimal transport")
  Member "lower bounds on locality sensitive hashing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "algorithms for similarity search and pseudorandomness")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)