human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "variations on multi core nested depth first search"):
  Abstract: Recently, two new parallel algorithms for on-the-fly model checking of LTL properties were presented at the same conference: Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis, 2011. Both approaches extend Swarmed NDFS, which runs several sequential NDFS instances in parallel. While parallel random search already speeds up detection of bugs, the workers must share some global information in order to speed up full verification of correct models. The two algorithms differ considerably in the global information shared between workers, and in the way they synchronize. #R##N#Here, we provide a thorough experimental comparison between the two algorithms, by measuring the runtime of their implementations on a multi-core machine. Both algorithms were implemented in the same framework of the model checker LTSmin, using similar optimizations, and have been subjected to the full BEEM model database. #R##N#Because both algorithms have complementary advantages, we constructed an algorithm that combines both ideas. This combination clearly has an improved speedup. We also compare the results with the alternative parallel algorithm for accepting cycle detection OWCTY-MAP. Finally, we study a simple statistical model for input models that do contain accepting cycles. The goal is to distinguish the speedup due to parallel random search from the speedup that can be attributed to clever work sharing schemes.

Includes members:
  Member "parallel recursive state compression for free":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "boosting multi core reachability performance with shared hash tables":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a generic inverted index framework for similarity search on the gpu technical report")
  Member "comparison of algorithms for checking emptiness on buechi automata":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)