human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "how intelligent are convolutional neural networks"):
  Abstract: Motivated by the Gestalt pattern theory, and the Winograd Challenge for language understanding, we design synthetic experiments to investigate a deep learning algorithm's ability to infer simple (at least for human) visual concepts, such as symmetry, from examples. A visual concept is represented by randomly generated, positive as well as negative, example images. We then test the ability and speed of algorithms (and humans) to learn the concept from these images. The training and testing are performed progressively in multiple rounds, with each subsequent round deliberately designed to be more complex and confusing than the previous round(s), especially if the concept was not grasped by the learner. However, if the concept was understood, all the deliberate tests would become trivially easy. Our experiments show that humans can often infer a semantic concept quickly after looking at only a very small number of examples (this is often referred to as an "aha moment": a moment of sudden realization), and performs perfectly during all testing rounds (except for careless mistakes). On the contrary, deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) could approximate some concepts statistically, but only after seeing many (x10^4) more examples. And it will still make obvious mistakes, especially during deliberate testing rounds or on samples outside the training distributions. This signals a lack of true "understanding", or a failure to reach the right "formula" for the semantics. We did find that some concepts are easier for DCNN than others. For example, simple "counting" is more learnable than "symmetry", while "uniformity" or "conformance" are much more difficult for DCNN to learn. To conclude, we propose an "Aha Challenge" for visual perception, calling for focused and quantitative research on Gestalt-style machine intelligence using limited training examples.

Includes members:
  Member "adversarial attacks on neural network policies":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "challenges and countermeasures for adversarial attacks on deep reinforcement learning")
  Member "robust physical world attacks on deep learning models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "prototypical networks for few shot learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "intelligence physics and information the tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity in machine learning")
  Member "vulnerability of deep reinforcement learning to policy induction attacks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "challenges and countermeasures for adversarial attacks on deep reinforcement learning")
  Member "practical black box attacks against machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "deep learning in neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "π nets deep polynomial neural networks")
  Member "deep residual learning for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "visual learning of arithmetic operations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "arithmetic addition of two integers by deep image classification networks experiments to quantify their autonomous reasoning ability")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)