human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "locally differentially private heavy hitter identification"):
  Abstract: The notion of Local Differential Privacy (LDP) enables users to answer sensitive questions while preserving their privacy. The basic LDP frequent oracle protocol enables the aggregator to estimate the frequency of any value. But when the domain of input values is large, finding the most frequent values, also known as the heavy hitters, by estimating the frequencies of all possible values, is computationally infeasible. In this paper, we propose an LDP protocol for identifying heavy hitters. In our proposed protocol, which we call Prefix Extending Method (PEM), users are divided into groups, with each group reporting a prefix of her value. We analyze how to choose optimal parameters for the protocol and identify two design principles for designing LDP protocols with high utility. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the advantage of our proposed protocol.

Includes members:
  Member "blender enabling local search with a hybrid differential privacy model":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the power of synergy in differential privacy combining a small curator with local randomizers")
  Member "practical locally private heavy hitters":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a workload adaptive mechanism for linear queries under local differential privacy")
  Member "towards practical differential privacy for sql queries":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "linkedin s audience engagements api a privacy preserving data analytics system at scale")
  Member "collecting and analyzing data from smart device users with local differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "privacy preserving boosting in the local setting")
  Member "building a rappor with the unknown privacy preserving learning of associations and data dictionaries":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "wireless federated learning with local differential privacy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)