human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "minor free graphs have light spanners"):
  Abstract: We show that every $H$-minor-free graph has a light $(1+\epsilon)$-spanner, resolving an open problem of Grigni and Sissokho and proving a conjecture of Grigni and Hung. Our lightness bound is \[O\left(\frac{\sigma_H}{\epsilon^3}\log \frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)\] where $\sigma_H = |V(H)|\sqrt{\log |V(H)|}$ is the sparsity coefficient of $H$-minor-free graphs. That is, it has a practical dependency on the size of the minor $H$. Our result also implies that the polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for the Travelling Salesperson Problem (TSP) in $H$-minor-free graphs by Demaine, Hajiaghayi and Kawarabayashi is an efficient PTAS whose running time is $2^{O_H\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon^4}\log \frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)}n^{O(1)}$ where $O_H$ ignores dependencies on the size of $H$. Our techniques significantly deviate from existing lines of research on spanners for $H$-minor-free graphs, but build upon the work of Chechik and Wulff-Nilsen for spanners of general graphs.

Includes members:
  Member "light spanners for bounded treewidth graphs imply light spanners for h minor free graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "the greedy spanner is existentially optimal":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a polynomial time algorithm for almost optimal vertex fault tolerant spanners")
  Member "light spanners in bounded pathwidth graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the greedy spanner is existentially optimal")
  Member "polynomial time approximation schemes for subset connectivity problems in bounded genus graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "minimum cuts in surface graphs")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)