human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "almost quadratic gap between partition complexity and query communication complexity"):
  Abstract: We show nearly quadratic separations between two pairs of complexity measures: #R##N#1. We show that there is a Boolean function $f$ with $D(f)=\Omega((D^{sc}(f))^{2-o(1)})$ where $D(f)$ is the deterministic query complexity of $f$ and $D^{sc}$ is the subcube partition complexity of $f$; #R##N#2. As a consequence, we obtain that there is a communication task $f(x, y)$ such that $D^{cc}(f)=\Omega(\log^{2-o(1)}\chi(f))$ where $D^{cc}(f)$ is the deterministic 2-party communication complexity of $f$ (in the standard 2-party model of communication) and $\chi(f)$ is the partition number of $f$. #R##N#Both of those separations are nearly optimal: it is well known that $D(f)=O((D^{sc}(f))^{2})$ and $D^{cc}(f)=O(\log^2\chi(f))$.

Includes members:
  Member "separating decision tree complexity from subcube partition complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "low sensitivity functions from unambiguous certificates")
  Member "a quadratically tight partition bound for classical communication complexity and query complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "randomized query complexity of sabotaged and composed functions")
  Member "composition limits and separating examples for some boolean function complexity measures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a tight composition theorem for the randomized query complexity of partial functions")
  Member "the partition bound for classical communication complexity and query complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "query to communication lifting using low discrepancy gadgets")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)