human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "object proposal evaluation protocol is gameable"):
  Abstract: Object proposals have quickly become the de-facto pre-processing step in a number of vision pipelines (for object detection, object discovery, and other tasks). Their performance is usually evaluated on partially annotated datasets. In this paper, we argue that the choice of using a partially annotated dataset for evaluation of object proposals is problematic -- as we demonstrate via a thought experiment, the evaluation protocol is 'gameable', in the sense that progress under this protocol does not necessarily correspond to a "better" category independent object proposal algorithm. #R##N#To alleviate this problem, we: (1) Introduce a nearly-fully annotated version of PASCAL VOC dataset, which serves as a test-bed to check if object proposal techniques are overfitting to a particular list of categories. (2) Perform an exhaustive evaluation of object proposal methods on our introduced nearly-fully annotated PASCAL dataset and perform cross-dataset generalization experiments; and (3) Introduce a diagnostic experiment to detect the bias capacity in an object proposal algorithm. This tool circumvents the need to collect a densely annotated dataset, which can be expensive and cumbersome to collect. Finally, we plan to release an easy-to-use toolbox which combines various publicly available implementations of object proposal algorithms which standardizes the proposal generation and evaluation so that new methods can be added and evaluated on different datasets. We hope that the results presented in the paper will motivate the community to test the category independence of various object proposal methods by carefully choosing the evaluation protocol.

Includes members:
  Member "what makes for effective detection proposals":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "deeply activated salient region for instance search")
  Member "learning to segment object candidates":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "stem seg spatio temporal embeddings for instance segmentation in videos")
  Member "watch and learn semi supervised learning of object detectors from videos":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "generalizable semi supervised learning method to estimate mass from sparsely annotated images")
  Member "transferring rich feature hierarchies for robust visual tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "keyfilter aware real time uav object tracking")
  Member "segdeepm exploiting segmentation and context in deep neural networks for object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "deepproposal hunting objects by cascading deep convolutional layers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "cascade retinanet maintaining consistency for single stage object detection")
  Member "unsupervised object discovery and tracking in video collections":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "stem seg spatio temporal embeddings for instance segmentation in videos")
  Member "faster r cnn towards real time object detection with region proposal networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)