human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "being even slightly shallow makes life hard"):
  Abstract: We study the computational complexity of identifying dense substructures, namely $r/2$-shallow topological minors and $r$-subdivisions. Of particular interest is the case when $r=1$, when these substructures correspond to very localized relaxations of subgraphs. Since Densest Subgraph can be solved in polynomial time, we ask whether these slight relaxations also admit efficient algorithms. #R##N#In the following, we provide a negative answer: Dense $r/2$-Shallow Topological Minor and Dense $r$-Subdivsion are already NP-hard for $r = 1$ in very sparse graphs. Further, they do not admit algorithms with running time $2^{o(\mathbf{tw}^2)} n^{O(1)}$ when parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph for $r \geq 2$ unless ETH fails.

Includes members:
  Member "kernelization and sparseness the case of dominating set":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "domination above r independence does sparseness help")
  Member "kernelization using structural parameters on sparse graph classes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on the parameterized complexity of reconfiguration of connected dominating sets")
  Member "solving connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth in single exponential time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "hamiltonian cycle parameterized by treedepth in single exponential time and polynomial space")
  Member "problems parameterized by treewidth tractable in single exponential time a logical approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "subexponential parameterized algorithms and kernelization on almost chordal graphs")
  Member "minimum weight triangulation is np hard":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "geometry and generation of a new graph planarity game")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)