human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "linear signal recovery from b bit quantized linear measurements precise analysis of the trade off between bit depth and number of measurements"):
  Abstract: We consider the problem of recovering a high-dimensional structured signal from independent Gaussian linear measurements each of which is quantized to $b$ bits. Our interest is in linear approaches to signal recovery, where "linear" means that non-linearity resulting from quantization is ignored and the observations are treated as if they arose from a linear measurement model. Specifically, the focus is on a generalization of a method for one-bit observations due to Plan and Vershynin [\emph{IEEE~Trans. Inform. Theory, \textbf{59} (2013), 482--494}]. At the heart of the present paper is a precise characterization of the optimal trade-off between the number of measurements $m$ and the bit depth per measurement $b$ given a total budget of $B = m \cdot b$ bits when the goal is to minimize the $\ell_2$-error in estimating the signal. It turns out that the choice $b = 1$ is optimal for estimating the unit vector (direction) corresponding to the signal for any level of additive Gaussian noise before quantization as well as for a specific model of adversarial noise, while the choice $b = 2$ is optimal for estimating the direction and the norm (scale) of the signal. Moreover, Lloyd-Max quantization is shown to be an optimal quantization scheme w.r.t. $\ell_2$-estimation error. Our analysis is corroborated by numerical experiments showing nearly perfect agreement with our theoretical predictions. The paper is complemented by an empirical comparison to alternative methods of signal recovery taking the non-linearity resulting from quantization into account. The results of that comparison point to a regime change depending on the noise level: in a low-noise setting, linear signal recovery falls short of more sophisticated competitors while being competitive in moderate- and high-noise settings.

Includes members:
  Member "the generalized lasso with non linear observations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "compressed sensing with 1d total variation breaking sample complexity barriers via non uniform recovery")
  Member "error decay of almost consistent signal estimations from quantized gaussian random projections":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "quantized compressed sensing by rectified linear units")
  Member "quantized iterative hard thresholding bridging 1 bit and high resolution quantized compressed sensing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "serial quantization for sparse time sequences")
  Member "robust 1 bit compressed sensing and sparse logistic regression a convex programming approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "efficient active learning of sparse halfspaces with arbitrary bounded noise")
  Member "regime change bit depth versus measurement rate in compressive sensing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "quantized compressed sensing by rectified linear units")
  Member "one bit compressed sensing by linear programming":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "efficient active learning of sparse halfspaces with arbitrary bounded noise")
  Member "robust 1 bit compressive sensing via binary stable embeddings of sparse vectors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "serial quantization for sparse time sequences")
  Member "how well can we estimate a sparse vector":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "an introductory guide to fano s inequality with applications in statistical estimation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)