human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "strong eth breaks with merlin and arthur short non interactive proofs of batch evaluation"):
  Abstract: We present an efficient proof system for Multipoint Arithmetic Circuit Evaluation: for every arithmetic circuit $C(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ of size $s$ and degree $d$ over a field ${\mathbb F}$, and any inputs $a_1,\ldots,a_K \in {\mathbb F}^n$, #R##N#$\bullet$ the Prover sends the Verifier the values $C(a_1), \ldots, C(a_K) \in {\mathbb F}$ and a proof of $\tilde{O}(K \cdot d)$ length, and #R##N#$\bullet$ the Verifier tosses $\textrm{poly}(\log(dK|{\mathbb F}|/\varepsilon))$ coins and can check the proof in about $\tilde{O}(K \cdot(n + d) + s)$ time, with probability of error less than $\varepsilon$. #R##N#For small degree $d$, this "Merlin-Arthur" proof system (a.k.a. MA-proof system) runs in nearly-linear time, and has many applications. For example, we obtain MA-proof systems that run in $c^{n}$ time (for various $c < 2$) for the Permanent, $\#$Circuit-SAT for all sublinear-depth circuits, counting Hamiltonian cycles, and infeasibility of $0$-$1$ linear programs. In general, the value of any polynomial in Valiant's class ${\sf VP}$ can be certified faster than "exhaustive summation" over all possible assignments. These results strongly refute a Merlin-Arthur Strong ETH and Arthur-Merlin Strong ETH posed by Russell Impagliazzo and others. #R##N#We also give a three-round (AMA) proof system for quantified Boolean formulas running in $2^{2n/3+o(n)}$ time, nearly-linear time MA-proof systems for counting orthogonal vectors in a collection and finding Closest Pairs in the Hamming metric, and a MA-proof system running in $n^{k/2+O(1)}$-time for counting $k$-cliques in graphs. #R##N#We point to some potential future directions for refuting the Nondeterministic Strong ETH.

Includes members:
  Member "quadratic time hardness of lcs and other sequence similarity measures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "dynamic time warping in strongly subquadratic time algorithms for the low distance regime and approximate evaluation")
  Member "probabilistic polynomials and hamming nearest neighbors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "algorithms for similarity search and pseudorandomness")
  Member "why walking the dog takes time frechet distance has no strongly subquadratic algorithms unless seth fails":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "graphs cannot be indexed in polynomial time for sub quadratic time string matching unless seth fails")
  Member "circuit complexity proof complexity and polynomial identity testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "search problems in algebraic complexity gct and hardness of generator for invariant rings")
  Member "popular conjectures imply strong lower bounds for dynamic problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "new algorithms and hardness for incremental single source shortest paths in directed graphs")
  Member "edit distance cannot be computed in strongly subquadratic time unless seth is false":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "streaming with oracle new streaming algorithms for edit distance and lcs")
  Member "time optimal interactive proofs for circuit evaluation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "doubly efficient pseudo deterministic proofs")
  Member "a satisfiability algorithm for sparse depth two threshold circuits":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "more consequences of falsifying seth and the orthogonal vectors conjecture")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)