human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on optimal top k string retrieval"):
  Abstract: Let ${\cal{D}}$ = $\{d_1, d_2, d_3, ..., d_D\}$ be a given set of $D$ (string) documents of total length $n$. The top-$k$ document retrieval problem is to index $\cal{D}$ such that when a pattern $P$ of length $p$, and a parameter $k$ come as a query, the index returns the $k$ most relevant documents to the pattern $P$. Hon et. al. \cite{HSV09} gave the first linear space framework to solve this problem in $O(p + k\log k)$ time. This was improved by Navarro and Nekrich \cite{NN12} to $O(p + k)$. These results are powerful enough to support arbitrary relevance functions like frequency, proximity, PageRank, etc. In many applications like desktop or email search, the data resides on disk and hence disk-bound indexes are needed. Despite of continued progress on this problem in terms of theoretical, practical and compression aspects, any non-trivial bounds in external memory model have so far been elusive. Internal memory (or RAM) solution to this problem decomposes the problem into $O(p)$ subproblems and thus incurs the additive factor of $O(p)$. In external memory, these approaches will lead to $O(p)$ I/Os instead of optimal $O(p/B)$ I/O term where $B$ is the block-size. We re-interpret the problem independent of $p$, as interval stabbing with priority over tree-shaped structure. This leads us to a linear space index in external memory supporting top-$k$ queries (with unsorted outputs) in near optimal $O(p/B + \log_B n + \log^{(h)} n + k/B)$ I/Os for any constant $h${$\log^{(1)}n =\log n$ and $\log^{(h)} n = \log (\log^{(h-1)} n)$}. Then we get $O(n\log^*n)$ space index with optimal $O(p/B+\log_B n + k/B)$ I/Os.

Includes members:
  Member "cross document pattern matching":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "full fledged real time indexing for constant size alphabets")
  Member "towards an optimal space and query time index for top k document retrieval":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "spaces trees and colors the algorithmic landscape of document retrieval on sequences")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)