human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the squared error of generalized lasso a precise analysis"):
  Abstract: We consider the problem of estimating an unknown signal $x_0$ from noisy linear observations $y = Ax_0 + z\in R^m$. In many practical instances, $x_0$ has a certain structure that can be captured by a structure inducing convex function $f(\cdot)$. For example, $\ell_1$ norm can be used to encourage a sparse solution. To estimate $x_0$ with the aid of $f(\cdot)$, we consider the well-known LASSO method and provide sharp characterization of its performance. We assume the entries of the measurement matrix $A$ and the noise vector $z$ have zero-mean normal distributions with variances $1$ and $\sigma^2$ respectively. For the LASSO estimator $x^*$, we attempt to calculate the Normalized Square Error (NSE) defined as $\frac{\|x^*-x_0\|_2^2}{\sigma^2}$ as a function of the noise level $\sigma$, the number of observations $m$ and the structure of the signal. We show that, the structure of the signal $x_0$ and choice of the function $f(\cdot)$ enter the error formulae through the summary parameters $D(cone)$ and $D(\lambda)$, which are defined as the Gaussian squared-distances to the subdifferential cone and to the $\lambda$-scaled subdifferential, respectively. The first LASSO estimator assumes a-priori knowledge of $f(x_0)$ and is given by $\arg\min_{x}\{{\|y-Ax\|_2}~\text{subject to}~f(x)\leq f(x_0)\}$. We prove that its worst case NSE is achieved when $\sigma\rightarrow 0$ and concentrates around $\frac{D(cone)}{m-D(cone)}$. Secondly, we consider $\arg\min_{x}\{\|y-Ax\|_2+\lambda f(x)\}$, for some $\lambda\geq 0$. This time the NSE formula depends on the choice of $\lambda$ and is given by $\frac{D(\lambda)}{m-D(\lambda)}$. We then establish a mapping between this and the third estimator $\arg\min_{x}\{\frac{1}{2}\|y-Ax\|_2^2+ \lambda f(x)\}$. Finally, for a number of important structured signal classes, we translate our abstract formulae to closed-form upper bounds on the NSE.

Includes members:
  Member "corrupted sensing novel guarantees for separating structured signals":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "gradient descent with early stopping is provably robust to label noise for overparameterized neural networks")
  Member "the achievable performance of convex demixing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "exact matrix completion based on low rank hankel structure in the fourier domain")
  Member "living on the edge phase transitions in convex programs with random data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on the convex geometry of blind deconvolution and matrix completion")
  Member "regularly random duality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "compressed sensing of block sparse positive vectors")
  Member "a performance analysis framework for socp algorithms in noisy compressed sensing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sharp time data tradeoffs for linear inverse problems")
  Member "a framework to characterize performance of lasso algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a simple bound on the ber of the map decoder for massive mimo systems")
  Member "the phase transition of matrix recovery from gaussian measurements matches the minimax mse of matrix denoising":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "implicit regularization of normalization methods")
  Member "sharp mse bounds for proximal denoising":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "compressed sensing with 1d total variation breaking sample complexity barriers via non uniform recovery")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)