human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the shield that never was societies with single peaked preferences are more open to manipulation and control"):
  Abstract: Much work has been devoted, during the past twenty years, to using complexity to protect elections from manipulation and control. Many results have been obtained showing NP-hardness shields, and recently there has been much focus on whether such worst-case hardness protections can be bypassed by frequently correct heuristics or by approximations. This paper takes a very different approach: We argue that when electorates follow the canonical political science model of societal preferences the complexity shield never existed in the first place. In particular, we show that for electorates having single-peaked preferences, many existing NP-hardness results on manipulation and control evaporate.

Includes members:
  Member "eliciting single peaked preferences using comparison queries":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "swap dynamics in single peaked house markets")
  Member "sincere strategy preference based approval voting fully resists constructive control and broadly resists destructive control":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a parameterized perspective on protecting elections")
  Member "how hard is bribery in elections":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "selecting voting locations for fun and profit")
  Member "hybrid elections broaden complexity theoretic resistance to control":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a parameterized perspective on protecting elections")
  Member "a richer understanding of the complexity of election systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "computational social choice and computational complexity bffs")
  Member "dichotomy for voting systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the complexity of online bribery in sequential elections")
  Member "anyone but him the complexity of precluding an alternative":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "selecting voting locations for fun and profit")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)