human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "in narrative texts punctuation marks obey the same statistics as words"):
  Abstract: From a grammar point of view, the role of punctuation marks in a sentence is formally defined and well understood. In semantic analysis punctuation plays also a crucial role as a method of avoiding ambiguity of the meaning. A different situation can be observed in the statistical analyses of language samples, where the decision on whether the punctuation marks should be considered or should be neglected is seen rather as arbitrary and at present it belongs to a researcher's preference. An objective of this work is to shed some light onto this problem by providing us with an answer to the question whether the punctuation marks may be treated as ordinary words and whether they should be included in any analysis of the word co-occurrences. We already know from our previous study (S.źDroźdź etźal., Inf. Sci. 331 (2016) 32-44) that full stops that determine the length of sentences are the main carrier of long-range correlations. Now we extend that study and analyse statistical properties of the most common punctuation marks in a few Indo-European languages, investigate their frequencies, and locate them accordingly in the Zipf rank-frequency plots as well as study their role in the word-adjacency networks. We show that, from a statistical viewpoint, the punctuation marks reveal properties that are qualitatively similar to the properties of the most frequent words like articles, conjunctions, pronouns, and prepositions. This refers to both the Zipfian analysis and the network analysis. By adding the punctuation marks to the Zipf plots, we also show that these plots that are normally described by the Zipf-Mandelbrot distribution largely restore the power-law Zipfian behaviour for the most frequent items.Our results indicate that the punctuation marks can fruitfully be considered in the linguistic studies as their inclusion effectively extends dimensionality of an analysis and, therefore, it opens more space for possible manifestation of some previously unobserved effects.

Includes members:
  Member "a complex network approach to stylometry":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "using word embeddings to improve the discriminability of co occurrence text networks")
  Member "modeling the average shortest path length in growth of word adjacency networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "linguistic data mining with complex networks a stylometric oriented approach")
  Member "structure semantics interplay in complex networks and its effects on the predictability of similarity in texts":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "representation of texts as complex networks a mesoscopic approach")
  Member "linguistic complexity english vs polish text vs corpus":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "punctuation effects in english and esperanto texts":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a joint text mining rank size investigation of the rhetoric structures of the us presidents speeches")
  Member "beyond word frequency bursts lulls and scaling in the temporal distributions of words":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "computational human dynamics")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)