human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "multilingual twitter sentiment classification the role of human annotators"):
  Abstract: What are the limits of automated Twitter sentiment classification? We analyze a large set of manually labeled tweets in different languages, use them as training data, and construct automated classification models. It turns out that the quality of classification models depends much more on the quality and size of training data than on the type of the model trained. Experimental results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference between the performance of the top classification models. We quantify the quality of training data by applying various annotator agreement measures, and identify the weakest points of different datasets. We show that the model performance approaches the inter-annotator agreement when the size of the training set is sufficiently large. However, it is crucial to regularly monitor the self- and inter-annotator agreements since this improves the training datasets and consequently the model performance. Finally, we show that there is strong evidence that humans perceive the sentiment classes (negative, neutral, and positive) as ordered.

Includes members:
  Member "emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards understanding the information ecosystem through the lens of multiple web communities")
  Member "twitter sentiment analysis lexicon method machine learning method and their combination":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a new statistical approach for comparing algorithms for lexicon based sentiment analysis")
  Member "sentiment uncertainty and spam in twitter streams and its implications for general purpose realtime sentiment analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "the effects of twitter sentiment on stock price returns":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "cashtag piggybacking uncovering spam and bot activity in stock microblogs on twitter")
  Member "sentiment of emojis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "vocabulary based method for quantifying controversy in social media")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)