human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "weihrauch degrees of finding equilibria in sequential games"):
  Abstract: We consider the degrees of non-computability (Weihrauch degrees) of finding winning strategies (or more generally, Nash equilibria) in infinite sequential games with certain winning sets (or more generally, outcome sets). In particular, we show that as the complexity of the winning sets increases in the difference hierarchy, the complexity of constructing winning strategies increases in the effective Borel hierarchy.

Includes members:
  Member "infinite sequential games with real valued payoffs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the existence of weak subgame perfect equilibria")
  Member "how constructive is constructing measures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "computing haar measures")
  Member "towards synthetic descriptive set theory an instantiation with represented spaces":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a comparison of concepts from computable analysis and effective descriptive set theory")
  Member "the degree structure of weihrauch reducibility":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "searching for an analogue of atr in the weihrauch lattice")
  Member "on the semi lattices induced by continuous reducibilities":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "searching for an analogue of atr in the weihrauch lattice")
  Member "real hypercomputation and continuity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a comparison of concepts from computable analysis and effective descriptive set theory")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)