human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "polylogarithmic bounds on the competitiveness of min cost bipartite perfect matching with delays"):
  Abstract: We consider the problem of online Min-cost Perfect Matching with Delays (MPMD) recently introduced by Emek et al, (STOC 2016). This problem is defined on an underlying $n$-point metric space. An adversary presents real-time requests online at points of the metric space, and the algorithm is required to match them, possibly after keeping them waiting for some time. The cost incurred is the sum of the distances between matched pairs of points (the connection cost), and the sum of the waiting times of the requests (the delay cost). We present an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\log n)$, which improves the upper bound of $O(\log^2n+\log\Delta)$ of Emek et al, by removing the dependence on $\Delta$, the aspect ratio of the metric space (which can be unbounded as a function of $n$). The core of our algorithm is a deterministic algorithm for MPMD on metrics induced by edge-weighted trees of height $h$, whose cost is guaranteed to be at most $O(1)$ times the connection cost plus $O(h)$ times the delay cost of every feasible solution. The reduction from MPMD on arbitrary metrics to MPMD on trees is achieved using the result on embedding $n$-point metric spaces into distributions over weighted hierarchically separated trees of height $O(\log n)$, with distortion $O(\log n)$. We also prove a lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{\log n})$ on the competitive ratio of any randomized algorithm. This is the first lower bound which increases with $n$, and is attained on the metric of $n$ equally spaced points on a line. #R##N#The problem of Min-cost Bipartite Perfect Matching with Delays (MBPMD) is the same as MPMD except that every request is either positive or negative, and requests can be matched only if they have opposite polarity. We prove an upper bound of $O(\log n)$ and a lower bound of $\Omega(\log^{1/3}n)$ on the competitive ratio of MBPMD with a more involved analysis.

Includes members:
  Member "online matching haste makes waste":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "putting ridesharing to the test efficient and scalable solutions and the power of dynamic vehicle relocation")
  Member "improved bounds for online preemptive matching":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "prophet inequality for bipartite matching merits of being simple and non adaptive")
  Member "online vertex weighted bipartite matching and single bid budgeted allocations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "online graph matching problems with a worst case reassignment budget")
  Member "online stochastic matching beating 1 1 e":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "online graph matching problems with a worst case reassignment budget")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)