human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "extension complexity of stable set polytopes of bipartite graphs"):
  Abstract: The extension complexity $\mathsf{xc}(P)$ of a polytope $P$ is the minimum number of facets of a polytope that affinely projects to $P$. Let $G$ be a bipartite graph with $n$ vertices, $m$ edges, and no isolated vertices. Let $\mathsf{STAB}(G)$ be the convex hull of the stable sets of $G$. It is easy to see that $n \leqslant \mathsf{xc} (\mathsf{STAB}(G)) \leqslant n+m$. We improve both of these bounds. For the upper bound, we show that $\mathsf{xc} (\mathsf{STAB}(G))$ is $O(\frac{n^2}{\log n})$, which is an improvement when $G$ has quadratically many edges. For the lower bound, we prove that $\mathsf{xc} (\mathsf{STAB}(G))$ is $\Omega(n \log n)$ when $G$ is the incidence graph of a finite projective plane. We also provide examples of $3$-regular bipartite graphs $G$ such that the edge vs stable set matrix of $G$ has a fooling set of size $|E(G)|$.

Includes members:
  Member "fooling sets and the spanning tree polytope":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the combinatorial lower bound for the extension complexity of the spanning tree polytope")
  Member "extension complexity of independent set polytopes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "lifting with simple gadgets and applications to circuit and proof complexity")
  Member "communication complexity for algorithm designers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "complexity theory game theory and economics the barbados lectures")
  Member "the matching polytope has exponential extension complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "extended formulation lower bounds for refuting random csps")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics)