human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "crowdgather entity extraction over structured domains"):
  Abstract: Crowdsourced entity extraction is often used to acquire data for many applications, including recommendation systems, construction of aggregated listings and directories, and knowledge base construction. Current solutions focus on entity extraction using a single query, e.g., only using "give me another restaurant", when assembling a list of all restaurants. Due to the cost of human labor, solutions that focus on a single query can be highly impractical. #R##N#In this paper, we leverage the fact that entity extraction often focuses on {\em structured domains}, i.e., domains that are described by a collection of attributes, each potentially exhibiting hierarchical structure. Given such a domain, we enable a richer space of queries, e.g., "give me another Moroccan restaurant in Manhattan that does takeout". Naturally, enabling a richer space of queries comes with a host of issues, especially since many queries return empty answers. We develop new statistical tools that enable us to reason about the gain of issuing {\em additional queries} given little to no information, and show how we can exploit the overlaps across the results of queries for different points of the data domain to obtain accurate estimates of the gain. We cast the problem of {\em budgeted entity extraction} over large domains as an adaptive optimization problem that seeks to maximize the number of extracted entities, while minimizing the overall extraction costs. We evaluate our techniques with experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating a yield of up to 4X over competing approaches for the same budget.

Includes members:
  Member "optimal algorithms for crawling a hidden database in the web":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "mining hidden populations through attributed search")
  Member "crowder crowdsourcing entity resolution":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "crowdsourced collective entity resolution with relational match propagation")
  Member "human powered sorts and joins":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "reducing uncertainty of schema matching via crowdsourcing with accuracy rates")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DB(Databases)