human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "vertebral body segmentation with growcut initial experience workflow and practical application"):
  Abstract: Spinal diseases are very common; for example, the risk of osteoporotic fracture is 40% for White women and 13% for White men in the United States during their lifetime. Hence, the total number of surgical spinal treatments is on the rise with the aging population, and accurate diagnosis is of great importance to avoid complications and a reappearance of the symptoms. Imaging and analysis of a vertebral column is an exhausting task that can lead to wrong interpretations. The overall goal of this contribution is to study a cellular automata-based approach for the segmentation of vertebral bodies between the compacta and surrounding structures yielding to time savings and reducing interpretation errors.To obtain the ground truth, T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions of the spine were segmented in a slice-by-slice procedure by several neurosurgeons. Subsequently, the same vertebral bodies have been segmented by a physician using the cellular automata approach GrowCut.Manual and GrowCut segmentations have been evaluated against each other via the Dice Score and the Hausdorff distance resulting in 82.99% ± 5.03% and 18.91 ± 7.2 voxel, respectively. Moreover, the times have been determined during the slice-by-slice and the GrowCut course of actions, indicating a significantly reduced segmentation time (5.77 ± 0.73 min) of the algorithmic approach.In this contribution, we used the GrowCut segmentation algorithm publicly available in three-dimensional Slicer for three-dimensional segmentation of vertebral bodies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the GrowCut method has been studied for the usage of vertebral body segmentation. In brief, we found that the GrowCut segmentation times were consistently less than the manual segmentation times. Hence, GrowCut provides an alternative to a manual slice-by-slice segmentation process.

Includes members:
  Member "refinement cut user guided segmentation algorithm for translational science":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "clinical evaluation of semi automatic open source algorithmic software segmentation of the mandibular bone practical feasibility and assessment of a new course of action")
  Member "cube cut vertebral body segmentation in mri data through cubic shaped divergences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "computed tomography data collection of the complete human mandible and valid clinical ground truth models")
  Member "gbm volumetry using the 3d slicer medical image computing platform":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "computed tomography data collection of the complete human mandible and valid clinical ground truth models")
  Member "integration of the openigtlink network protocol for image guided therapy with the medical platform mevislab":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "computed tomography data collection of the complete human mandible and valid clinical ground truth models")
  Member "pituitary adenoma volumetry with 3d slicer":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "computed tomography data collection of the complete human mandible and valid clinical ground truth models")
  Member "square cut a segmentation algorithm on the basis of a rectangle shape":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "in depth assessment of an interactive graph based approach for the segmentation for pancreatic metastasis in ultrasound acquisitions of the liver with two specialists in internal medicine")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)