human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "games on graphs with a public signal monitoring"):
  Abstract: We study Nash equilibria in games on graphs with an imperfect monitoring based on a public signal. In such games, deviations and players responsible for those deviations can be hard to detect and track. We propose a generic epistemic game abstraction, which conveniently allows to represent the knowledge of the players about these deviations, and give a characterization of Nash equilibria in terms of winning strategies in the abstraction. We then use the abstraction to develop algorithms for some payoff functions.

Includes members:
  Member "decidability results for atl with imperfect information and perfect recall":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "strategic coalitions in stochastic games")
  Member "deviator detection under imperfect monitoring":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "strategy logic with imperfect information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reconfigurable interaction for mas modelling")
  Member "hierarchical information and the synthesis of distributed strategies":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "synthesis in presence of dynamic links")
  Member "infinite games with finite knowledge gaps":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "the complexity of nash equilibria in limit average games":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the complexity of subgame perfect equilibria in quantitative reachability games full version")
  Member "model checking an alternating time temporal logic with knowledge imperfect information perfect recall and communicating coalitions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "decidability results for atl with imperfect information and perfect recall")
  Member "algorithms for omega regular games with imperfect information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "alternating tree automata with qualitative semantics")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)