human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "buying private data without verification"):
  Abstract: We consider the problem of designing a survey to aggregate non-verifiable information from a privacy-sensitive population: an analyst wants to compute some aggregate statistic from the private bits held by each member of a population, but cannot verify the correctness of the bits reported by participants in his survey. Individuals in the population are strategic agents with a cost for privacy, \ie, they not only account for the payments they expect to receive from the mechanism, but also their privacy costs from any information revealed about them by the mechanism's outcome---the computed statistic as well as the payments---to determine their utilities. How can the analyst design payments to obtain an accurate estimate of the population statistic when individuals strategically decide both whether to participate and whether to truthfully report their sensitive information? #R##N#We design a differentially private peer-prediction mechanism that supports accurate estimation of the population statistic as a Bayes-Nash equilibrium in settings where agents have explicit preferences for privacy. The mechanism requires knowledge of the marginal prior distribution on bits $b_i$, but does not need full knowledge of the marginal distribution on the costs $c_i$, instead requiring only an approximate upper bound. Our mechanism guarantees $\epsilon$-differential privacy to each agent $i$ against any adversary who can observe the statistical estimate output by the mechanism, as well as the payments made to the $n-1$ other agents $j\neq i$. Finally, we show that with slightly more structured assumptions on the privacy cost functions of each agent, the cost of running the survey goes to $0$ as the number of agents diverges.

Includes members:
  Member "private matchings and allocations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "differentially private call auctions and market impact")
  Member "redrawing the boundaries on purchasing data from privacy sensitive individuals":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "prior free data acquisition for accurate statistical estimation")
  Member "asymptotically truthful equilibrium selection in large congestion games":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "differentially private call auctions and market impact")
  Member "privacy and mechanism design":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "segmentation incentives and privacy")
  Member "calibrating data to sensitivity in private data analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "conducting truthful surveys cheaply":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "towards data auctions with externalities")
  Member "mechanism design in large games incentives and privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "differentially private call auctions and market impact")
  Member "take it or leave it running a survey when privacy comes at a cost":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "reinforcement learning for the manipulation of eye tracking data")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)