human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "human level performance on word analogy questions by latent relational analysis"):
  Abstract: This paper introduces Latent Relational Analysis (LRA), a method for measuring relational similarity. LRA has potential applications in many areas, including information extraction, word sense disambiguation, machine translation, and information retrieval. Relational similarity is correspondence between relations, in contrast with attributional similarity, which is correspondence between attributes. When two words have a high degree of attributional similarity, we call them synonyms. When two pairs of words have a high degree of relational similarity, we say that their relations are analogous. For example, the word pair mason/stone is analogous to the pair carpenter/wood; the relations between mason and stone are highly similar to the relations between carpenter and wood. Past work on semantic similarity measures has mainly been concerned with attributional similarity. For instance, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) can measure the degree of similarity between two words, but not between two relations. Recently the Vector Space Model (VSM) of information retrieval has been adapted to the task of measuring relational similarity, achieving a score of 47% on a collection of 374 college-level multiple-choice word analogy questions. In the VSM approach, the relation between a pair of words is characterized by a vector of frequencies of predefined patterns in a large corpus. LRA extends the VSM approach in three ways: (1) the patterns are derived automatically from the corpus (they are not predefined), (2) the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to smooth the frequency data (it is also used this way in LSA), and (3) automatically generated synonyms are used to explore reformulations of the word pairs. LRA achieves 56% on the 374 analogy questions, statistically equivalent to the average human score of 57%. On the related problem of classifying noun-modifier relations, LRA achieves similar gains over the VSM, while using a smaller corpus.

Includes members:
  Member "roget s thesaurus and semantic similarity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "from word to sense embeddings a survey on vector representations of meaning")
  Member "corpus based learning of analogies and semantic relations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "sentence analogies exploring linguistic relationships and regularities in sentence embeddings")
  Member "word sense disambiguation by web mining for word co occurrence probabilities":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "combining independent modules to solve multiple choice synonym and analogy problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "using the web as an implicit training set application to noun compound syntax and semantics")
  Member "coherent keyphrase extraction via web mining":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "automatically extracting subroutine summary descriptions from unstructured comments")
  Member "learning analogies and semantic relations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "combining independent modules in lexical multiple choice problems")
  Member "measuring praise and criticism inference of semantic orientation from association":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "revisiting paraphrase question generator using pairwise discriminator")
  Member "thumbs up or thumbs down semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "utilizing neural networks and linguistic metadata for early detection of depression indications in text sequences")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)