human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a sampling technique of proving lower bounds for noisy computations"):
  Abstract: We present a technique of proving lower bounds for noisy computations. This is achieved by a theorem connecting computations on a kind of randomized decision trees and sampling based algorithms. This approach is surprisingly powerful, and applicable to several models of computation previously studied. #R##N#As a first illustration we show how all the results of Evans and Pippenger (SIAM J. Computing, 1999) for noisy decision trees, some of which were derived using Fourier analysis, follow immediately if we consider the sampling-based algorithms that naturally arise from these decision trees. #R##N#Next, we show a tight lower bound of $\Omega(N \log\log N)$ on the number of transmissions required to compute several functions (including the parity function and the majority function) in a network of $N$ randomly placed sensors, communicating using local transmissions, and operating with power near the connectivity threshold. This result considerably simplifies and strengthens an earlier result of Dutta, Kanoria Manjunath and Radhakrishnan (SODA 08) that such networks cannot compute the parity function reliably with significantly fewer than $N\log \log N$ transmissions. The lower bound for parity shown earlier made use of special properties of the parity function and is inapplicable, e.g., to the majority function. In this paper, we use our approach to develop an interesting connection between computation of boolean functions on noisy networks that make few transmissionss, and algorithms that work by sampling only a part of the input. It is straightforward to verify that such sampling-based algorithms cannot compute the majority function.

Includes members:
  Member "how hard is computing parity with noisy communications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "on distributed computation in noisy random planar networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "broadcasting in noisy radio networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)