human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "tree projections and constraint optimization problems fixed parameter tractability and parallel algorithms"):
  Abstract: Tree projections provide a unifying framework to deal with most structural decomposition methods of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). Within this framework, a CSP instance is decomposed into a number of sub-problems, called views, whose solutions are either already available or can be computed efficiently. The goal is to arrange portions of these views in a tree-like structure, called tree projection, which determines an efficiently solvable CSP instance equivalent to the original one. Deciding whether a tree projection exists is NP-hard. Solution methods have therefore been proposed in the literature that do not require a tree projection to be given, and that either correctly decide whether the given CSP instance is satisfiable, or return that a tree projection actually does not exist. These approaches had not been generalized so far on CSP extensions for optimization problems, where the goal is to compute a solution of maximum value/minimum cost. The paper fills the gap, by exhibiting a fixed-parameter polynomial-time algorithm that either disproves the existence of tree projections or computes an optimal solution, with the parameter being the size of the expression of the objective function to be optimized over all possible solutions (and not the size of the whole constraint formula, used in related works). Tractability results are also established for the problem of returning the best K solutions. Finally, parallel algorithms for such optimization problems are proposed and analyzed. Given that the classes of acyclic hypergraphs, hypergraphs of bounded treewidth, and hypergraphs of bounded generalized hypertree width are all covered as special cases of the tree projection framework, the results in this paper directly apply to these classes. These classes are extensively considered in the CSP setting, as well as in conjunctive database query evaluation and optimization.

Includes members:
  Member "constraint solving via fractional edge covers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "complexity analysis of general and fractional hypertree decompositions")
  Member "greedy strategies and larger islands of tractability for conjunctive queries and constraint satisfaction problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "general and fractional hypertree decompositions hard and easy cases":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "complexity analysis of general and fractional hypertree decompositions")
  Member "aggregations over generalized hypertree decompositions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "memory efficient group by aggregates over multi way joins")
  Member "faq questions asked frequently":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "complexity analysis of general and fractional hypertree decompositions")
  Member "structural tractability of enumerating csp solutions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "answering conjunctive queries under updates")
  Member "a quasi polynomial time partition oracle for graphs with an excluded minor":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "local computation algorithms for spanners")
  Member "possibilistic constraint satisfaction problems or how to handle soft constraints":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "human in the loop learning of qualitative preference models")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)