human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "stationary and transition probabilities in slow mixing long memory markov processes"):
  Abstract: We observe a length-$n$ sample generated by an unknown,stationary ergodic Markov process (\emph{model}) over a finite alphabet $\mathcal{A}$. Given any string $\bf{w}$ of symbols from $\mathcal{A}$ we want estimates of the conditional probability distribution of symbols following $\bf{w}$, as well as the stationary probability of $\bf{w}$. Two distinct problems that complicate estimation in this setting are (i) long memory, and (ii) \emph{slow mixing} which could happen even with only one bit of memory. #R##N#Any consistent estimator in this setting can only converge pointwise over the class of all ergodic Markov models. Namely, given any estimator and any sample size $n$, the underlying model could be such that the estimator performs poorly on a sample of size $n$ with high probability. But can we look at a length-$n$ sample and identify \emph{if} an estimate is likely to be accurate? #R##N#Since the memory is unknown \emph{a-priori}, a natural approach is to estimate a potentially coarser model with memory $k_n=\mathcal{O}(\log n)$. As $n$ grows, pointwise consistent estimates that hold eventually almost surely (eas) are known so long as the scaling of $k_n$ is not superlogarithmic in $n$. Here, rather than eas convergence results, we want the best answers possible with a length-$n$ sample. Combining results in universal compression with Aldous' coupling arguments, we obtain sufficient conditions on the length-$n$ sample (even for slow mixing models) to identify when naive (i) estimates of the conditional probabilities and (ii) estimates related to the stationary probabilities are accurate; and also bound the deviations of the naive estimates from true values.

Includes members:
  Member "optimization of information rate upper and lower bounds for channels with memory":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bounding and estimating the classical information rate of quantum channels with memory")
  Member "compression based methods for nonparametric density estimation on line prediction regression and classification for time series":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "experimental investigation of forecasting methods based on universal measures")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)