human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a 1 epsilon approximation for makespan scheduling with precedence constraints using lp hierarchies"):
  Abstract: In a classical problem in scheduling, one has $n$ unit size jobs with a precedence order and the goal is to find a schedule of those jobs on $m$ identical machines as to minimize the makespan. It is one of the remaining four open problems from the book of Garey & Johnson whether or not this problem is $\mathbf{NP}$-hard for $m=3$. #R##N#We prove that for any fixed $\varepsilon$ and $m$, an LP-hierarchy lift of the time-indexed LP with a slightly super poly-logarithmic number of $r = (\log(n))^{\Theta(\log \log n)}$ rounds provides a $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximation. For example Sherali-Adams suffices as hierarchy. This implies an algorithm that yields a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation in time $n^{O(r)}$. The previously best approximation algorithms guarantee a $2 - \frac{7}{3m+1}$-approximation in polynomial time for $m \geq 4$ and $\frac{4}{3}$ for $m=3$. Our algorithm is based on a recursive scheduling approach where in each step we reduce the correlation in form of long chains. Our method adds to the rather short list of examples where hierarchies are actually useful to obtain better approximation algorithms.

Includes members:
  Member "sparsest cut on bounded treewidth graphs algorithms and hardness results":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the parameterized complexity of sparsest cut and small set expansion problems")
  Member "approximating csps with global cardinality constraints using sdp hierarchies":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "new dependencies of hierarchies in polynomial optimization")
  Member "approximating sparsest cut in graphs of bounded treewidth":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "integrality gaps for bounded color matchings")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)