human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "recurrent neural networks with specialized word embeddings for health domain named entity recognition"):
  Abstract: Display Omitted Past approaches to health-domain NER have mainly used manual features and conventional classifiers.In this paper, we explore a neural network approach (B-LSTM-CRF) that can learn the features automatically.In addition, initializing the features with pre-trained embeddings can lead to higher accuracy.We pre-train the features using a critical care database (MIMIC-III).Experiments have been carried out over three contemporary datasets for health-domain NER, outperforming past systems. BackgroundPrevious state-of-the-art systems on Drug Name Recognition (DNR) and Clinical Concept Extraction (CCE) have focused on a combination of text feature engineering and conventional machine learning algorithms such as conditional random fields and support vector machines. However, developing good features is inherently heavily time-consuming. Conversely, more modern machine learning approaches such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have proved capable of automatically learning effective features from either random assignments or automated word embeddings. Objectives(i) To create a highly accurate DNR and CCE system that avoids conventional, time-consuming feature engineering. (ii) To create richer, more specialized word embeddings by using health domain datasets such as MIMIC-III. (iii) To evaluate our systems over three contemporary datasets. MethodsTwo deep learning methods, namely the Bidirectional LSTM and the Bidirectional LSTM-CRF, are evaluated. A CRF model is set as the baseline to compare the deep learning systems to a traditional machine learning approach. The same features are used for all the models. ResultsWe have obtained the best results with the Bidirectional LSTM-CRF model, which has outperformed all previously proposed systems. The specialized embeddings have helped to cover unusual words in DrugBank and MedLine, but not in the i2b2/VA dataset. ConclusionsWe present a state-of-the-art system for DNR and CCE. Automated word embeddings has allowed us to avoid costly feature engineering and achieve higher accuracy. Nevertheless, the embeddings need to be retrained over datasets that are adequate for the domain, in order to adequately cover the domain-specific vocabulary.

Includes members:
  Member "de identification of patient notes with recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "secnlp a survey of embeddings in clinical natural language processing")
  Member "an investigation of recurrent neural architectures for drug name recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "secnlp a survey of embeddings in clinical natural language processing")
  Member "feature augmented neural networks for patient note de identification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "secnlp a survey of embeddings in clinical natural language processing")
  Member "structured prediction models for rnn based sequence labeling in clinical text":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "secnlp a survey of embeddings in clinical natural language processing")
  Member "neural architectures for named entity recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "knowledge graphs")
  Member "distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)