human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "mix and match tuning for self supervised semantic segmentation"):
  Abstract: Deep convolutional networks for semantic image segmentation typically require large-scale labeled data, e.g. ImageNet and MS COCO, for network pre-training. To reduce annotation efforts, self-supervised semantic segmentation is recently proposed to pre-train a network without any human-provided labels. The key of this new form of learning is to design a proxy task (e.g. image colorization), from which a discriminative loss can be formulated on unlabeled data. Many proxy tasks, however, lack the critical supervision signals that could induce discriminative representation for the target image segmentation task. Thus self-supervision's performance is still far from that of supervised pre-training. In this study, we overcome this limitation by incorporating a "mix-and-match" (M&M) tuning stage in the self-supervision pipeline. The proposed approach is readily pluggable to many self-supervision methods and does not use more annotated samples than the original process. Yet, it is capable of boosting the performance of target image segmentation task to surpass fully-supervised pre-trained counterpart. The improvement is made possible by better harnessing the limited pixel-wise annotations in the target dataset. Specifically, we first introduce the "mix" stage, which sparsely samples and mixes patches from the target set to reflect rich and diverse local patch statistics of target images. A "match" stage then forms a class-wise connected graph, which can be used to derive a strong triplet-based discriminative loss for fine-tuning the network. Our paradigm follows the standard practice in existing self-supervised studies and no extra data or label is required. With the proposed M&M approach, for the first time, a self-supervision method can achieve comparable or even better performance compared to its ImageNet pre-trained counterpart on both PASCAL VOC2012 dataset and CityScapes dataset.

Includes members:
  Member "weakly supervised semantic segmentation using web crawled videos":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "ha ccn hierarchical attention based crowd counting network")
  Member "colorization as a proxy task for visual understanding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "rgb based semantic segmentation using self supervised depth pre training")
  Member "the cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "gan compression efficient architectures for interactive conditional gans")
  Member "learning representations for automatic colorization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "learning representations by predicting bags of visual words")
  Member "adversarial feature learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a large scale study of representation learning with the visual task adaptation benchmark")
  Member "learning features by watching objects move":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "learning video object segmentation from unlabeled videos")
  Member "unsupervised learning of visual representations by solving jigsaw puzzles":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "learning representations by predicting bags of visual words")
  Member "split brain autoencoders unsupervised learning by cross channel prediction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "learning representations by predicting bags of visual words")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)