human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "effect of confidence and explanation on accuracy and trust calibration in ai assisted decision making"):
  Abstract: Today, AI is being increasingly used to help human experts make decisions in high-stakes scenarios. In these scenarios, full automation is often undesirable, not only due to the significance of the outcome, but also because human experts can draw on their domain knowledge complementary to the model's to ensure task success. We refer to these scenarios as AI-assisted decision making, where the individual strengths of the human and the AI come together to optimize the joint decision outcome. A key to their success is to appropriately \textit{calibrate} human trust in the AI on a case-by-case basis; knowing when to trust or distrust the AI allows the human expert to appropriately apply their knowledge, improving decision outcomes in cases where the model is likely to perform poorly. This research conducts a case study of AI-assisted decision making in which humans and AI have comparable performance alone, and explores whether features that reveal case-specific model information can calibrate trust and improve the joint performance of the human and AI. Specifically, we study the effect of showing confidence score and local explanation for a particular prediction. Through two human experiments, we show that confidence score can help calibrate people's trust in an AI model, but trust calibration alone is not sufficient to improve AI-assisted decision making, which may also depend on whether the human can bring in enough unique knowledge to complement the AI's errors. We also highlight the problems in using local explanation for AI-assisted decision making scenarios and invite the research community to explore new approaches to explainability for calibrating human trust in AI.

Includes members:
  Member "on human predictions with explanations and predictions of machine learning models a case study on deception detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences")
  Member "explaining models an empirical study of how explanations impact fairness judgment":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences")
  Member "metrics for explainable ai challenges and prospects":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences")
  Member "manipulating and measuring model interpretability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences")
  Member "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "a unified approach to interpreting model predictions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "deep neural networks are easily fooled high confidence predictions for unrecognizable images":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "sam the sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)