human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "seeing far vs seeing wide volume complexity of local graph problems"):
  Abstract: Consider a graph problem that is locally checkable but not locally solvable: given a solution we can check that it is feasible by verifying all constant-radius neighborhoods, but to find a solution each node needs to explore the input graph at least up to distance $\Omega(\log n)$ in order to produce its output.Such problems have been studied extensively in the recent years in the area of distributed computing, where the key complexity measure has been distance: how far does a node need to see in order to produce its output. However, if we are interested in e.g. sublinear-time centralized algorithms, a more appropriate complexity measure would be volume: how large a subgraph does a node need to see in order to produce its output. #R##N#In this work we study locally checkable graph problems on bounded-degree graphs. We give a number of constructions that exhibit tradeoffs between deterministic distance, randomized distance, deterministic volume, and randomized volume: #R##N#- If the deterministic distance is linear, it is also known that randomized distance is near-linear. In contrast, we show that there are problems with linear deterministic volume but only logarithmic randomized volume. #R##N#- We prove a volume hierarchy theorem for randomized complexity: among problems with linear deterministic volume complexity, there are infinitely many distinct randomized volume complexity classes between $\Omega(\log n)$ and $O(n)$. This hierarchy persists even when restricting to problems whose randomized and deterministic distance complexities are $\Theta(\log n)$. #R##N#- Similar hierarchies exist for polynomial distance complexities: for any $k, \ell \in N$ with $k \leq \ell$, there are problems whose randomized and deterministic distance complexities are $\Theta(n^{1/\ell})$, randomized volume complexities are $\Theta(n^{1/k})$, and whose deterministic volume complexities are $\Theta(n)$.

Includes members:
  Member "an automatic speedup theorem for distributed problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "truly tight in delta bounds for bipartite maximal matching and variants")
  Member "polylogarithmic time deterministic network decomposition and distributed derandomization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "massively parallel algorithms for distance approximation and spanners")
  Member "how much does randomness help with locally checkable problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "distributed graph problems through an automata theoretic lens")
  Member "locality of not so weak coloring":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "truly tight in delta bounds for bipartite maximal matching and variants")
  Member "almost global problems in the local model":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "distributed graph problems through an automata theoretic lens")
  Member "the distributed complexity of locally checkable problems on paths is decidable":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "distributed graph problems through an automata theoretic lens")
  Member "sparsifying distributed algorithms with ramifications in massively parallel computation and centralized local computation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "equivalence classes and conditional hardness in massively parallel computations")
  Member "hardness of minimal symmetry breaking in distributed computing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "truly tight in delta bounds for bipartite maximal matching and variants")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)