human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "privileged features distillation for e commerce recommendations"):
  Abstract: Features play an important role in most prediction tasks of e-commerce recommendations. To guarantee the consistence of off-line training and on-line serving, we usually utilize the same features that are both available. However, the consistence in turn neglects some discriminative features. For example, when estimating the conversion rate (CVR), i.e., the probability that a user would purchase the item after she has clicked it, features like dwell time on the item detailed page can be very informative. However, CVR prediction should be conducted for on-line ranking before the click happens. Thus we cannot get such post-event features during serving. #R##N#Here we define the features that are discriminative but only available during training as the privileged features. Inspired by the distillation techniques which bridge the gap between training and inference, in this work, we propose privileged features distillation (PFD). We train two models, i.e., a student model that is the same as the original one and a teacher model that additionally utilizes the privileged features. Knowledge distilled from the more accurate teacher is transferred to the student, which helps to improve its prediction accuracy. During serving, only the student part is extracted. To our knowledge, this is the first work to fully exploit the potential of such features. To validate the effectiveness of PFD, we conduct experiments on two fundamental prediction tasks in Taobao recommendations, i.e., click-through rate (CTR) at coarse-grained ranking and CVR at fine-grained ranking. By distilling the interacted features that are prohibited during serving for CTR and the post-event features for CVR, we achieve significant improvements over both of the strong baselines. Besides, by addressing several issues of training PFD, we obtain comparable training speed as the baselines without any distillation.

Includes members:
  Member "deep learning under privileged information using heteroscedastic dropout":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "privileged features distillation at taobao recommendations")
  Member "xdeepfm combining explicit and implicit feature interactions for recommender systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "cross gcn enhancing graph convolutional network with k order feature interactions")
  Member "large scale distributed neural network training through online distillation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "distilled hierarchical neural ensembles with adaptive inference cost")
  Member "modality distillation with multiple stream networks for action recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "input dropout for spatially aligned modalities")
  Member "self attentive sequential recommendation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "advances in collaborative filtering and ranking")
  Member "deep mutual learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "cross resolution adversarial dual network for person re identification and beyond")
  Member "attention is all you need":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "apprentice using knowledge distillation techniques to improve low precision network accuracy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "switchable precision neural networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)