human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "dealing with imperfect information in strategy logic"):
  Abstract: We propose an extension of Strategy Logic (SL), in which one can both reason about strategizing under imperfect information and about players' knowledge. One original aspect of our approach is that we do not force strategies to be uniform, i.e. consistent with the players' information, at the semantic level; instead, one can express in the logic itself that a strategy should be uniform. To do so, we first develop a "branching-time" version of SL with perfect information, that we call BSL, in which one can quantify over the different outcomes defined by a partial assignment of strategies to the players; this contrasts with SL, where temporal operators are allowed only when all strategies are fixed, leaving only one possible play. Next, we further extend BSL by adding distributed knowledge operators, the semantics of which rely on equivalence relations on partial plays. The logic we obtain subsumes most strategic logics with imperfect information, epistemic or not.

Includes members:
  Member "games with recurring certainty":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "infinite games with finite knowledge gaps")
  Member "mcmas slk a model checker for the verification of strategy logic specifications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "strategic abilities of asynchronous agents semantic paradoxes and how to tame them")
  Member "reasoning about knowledge and strategies epistemic strategy logic":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "sat based atl satisfiability checking")
  Member "satisfiability of atl with strategy contexts":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "reasoning about strategies on the model checking problem")
  Member "reasoning about strategies on the model checking problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "reconfigurable interaction for mas modelling")
  Member "complete axiomatizations for reasoning about knowledge and time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "propositional dynamic logic for hyperproperties")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)