human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "taking a stance on fake news towards automatic disinformation assessment via deep bidirectional transformer language models for stance detection"):
  Abstract: The exponential rise of social media and digital news in the past decade has had the unfortunate consequence of escalating what the United Nations has called a global topic of concern: the growing prevalence of disinformation. Given the complexity and time-consuming nature of combating disinformation through human assessment, one is motivated to explore harnessing AI solutions to automatically assess news articles for the presence of disinformation. A valuable first step towards automatic identification of disinformation is stance detection, where given a claim and a news article, the aim is to predict if the article agrees, disagrees, takes no position, or is unrelated to the claim. Existing approaches in literature have largely relied on hand-engineered features or shallow learned representations (e.g., word embeddings) to encode the claim-article pairs, which can limit the level of representational expressiveness needed to tackle the high complexity of disinformation identification. In this work, we explore the notion of harnessing large-scale deep bidirectional transformer language models for encoding claim-article pairs in an effort to construct state-of-the-art stance detection geared for identifying disinformation. Taking advantage of bidirectional cross-attention between claim-article pairs via pair encoding with self-attention, we construct a large-scale language model for stance detection by performing transfer learning on a RoBERTa deep bidirectional transformer language model, and were able to achieve state-of-the-art performance (weighted accuracy of 90.01%) on the Fake News Challenge Stage 1 (FNC-I) benchmark. These promising results serve as motivation for harnessing such large-scale language models as powerful building blocks for creating effective AI solutions to combat disinformation.

Includes members:
  Member "assessing social and intersectional biases in contextualized word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "measuring social biases in grounded vision and language embeddings")
  Member "fakta an automatic end to end fact checking system":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "gradient based adversarial training on transformer networks for detecting check worthy factual claims")
  Member "seeing things from a different angle discovering diverse perspectives about claims":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "stance detection benchmark how robust is your stance detection")
  Member "measuring bias in contextualized word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "predictive biases in natural language processing models a conceptual framework and overview")
  Member "huggingface s transformers state of the art natural language processing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "unsupervised question decomposition for question answering")
  Member "xlnet generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "roberta a robustly optimized bert pretraining approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "a retrospective analysis of the fake news challenge stance detection task":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "stance detection benchmark how robust is your stance detection")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)