human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "optimal sketching for kronecker product regression and low rank approximation"):
  Abstract: We study the Kronecker product regression problem, in which the design matrix is a Kronecker product of two or more matrices. Given $A_i \in \mathbb{R}^{n_i \times d_i}$ for $i=1,2,\dots,q$ where $n_i \gg d_i$ for each $i$, and $b \in \mathbb{R}^{n_1 n_2 \cdots n_q}$, let $\mathcal{A} = A_1 \otimes A_2 \otimes \cdots \otimes A_q$. Then for $p \in [1,2]$, the goal is to find $x \in \mathbb{R}^{d_1 \cdots d_q}$ that approximately minimizes $\|\mathcal{A}x - b\|_p$. Recently, Diao, Song, Sun, and Woodruff (AISTATS, 2018) gave an algorithm which is faster than forming the Kronecker product $\mathcal{A}$ Specifically, for $p=2$ their running time is $O(\sum_{i=1}^q \text{nnz}(A_i) + \text{nnz}(b))$, where nnz$(A_i)$ is the number of non-zero entries in $A_i$. Note that nnz$(b)$ can be as large as $n_1 \cdots n_q$. For $p=1,$ $q=2$ and $n_1 = n_2$, they achieve a worse bound of $O(n_1^{3/2} \text{poly}(d_1d_2) + \text{nnz}(b))$. In this work, we provide significantly faster algorithms. For $p=2$, our running time is $O(\sum_{i=1}^q \text{nnz}(A_i) )$, which has no dependence on nnz$(b)$. For $p<2$, our running time is $O(\sum_{i=1}^q \text{nnz}(A_i) + \text{nnz}(b))$, which matches the prior best running time for $p=2$. We also consider the related all-pairs regression problem, where given $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}, b \in \mathbb{R}^n$, we want to solve $\min_{x} \|\bar{A}x - \bar{b}\|_p$, where $\bar{A} \in \mathbb{R}^{n^2 \times d}, \bar{b} \in \mathbb{R}^{n^2}$ consist of all pairwise differences of the rows of $A,b$. We give an $O(\text{nnz}(A))$ time algorithm for $p \in[1,2]$, improving the $\Omega(n^2)$ time needed to form $\bar{A}$. Finally, we initiate the study of Kronecker product low rank and low $t$-rank approximation. For input $\mathcal{A}$ as above, we give $O(\sum_{i=1}^q \text{nnz}(A_i))$ time algorithms, which is much faster than computing $\mathcal{A}$.

Includes members:
  Member "solving empirical risk minimization in the current matrix multiplication time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "solving tall dense linear programs in nearly linear time")
  Member "almost optimal tensor sketch":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "oblivious sketching of high degree polynomial kernels")
  Member "oblivious sketching of high degree polynomial kernels":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "tensorized random projections")
  Member "a deterministic linear program solver in current matrix multiplication time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "solving tall dense linear programs in nearly linear time")
  Member "tight bounds for ell_p oblivious subspace embeddings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing")
  Member "solving linear programs in the current matrix multiplication time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "solving tall dense linear programs in nearly linear time")
  Member "towards a zero one law for entrywise low rank approximation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing")
  Member "sublinear time low rank approximation of distance matrices":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "robust and sample optimal algorithms for psd low rank approximation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)