human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "advcodec towards a unified framework for adversarial text generation"):
  Abstract: While there has been great interest in generating imperceptible adversarial examples in continuous data domain (e.g. image and audio) to explore the model vulnerabilities, generating \emph{adversarial text} in the discrete domain is still challenging. The main contribution of this paper is to propose a general targeted attack framework AdvCodec for adversarial text generation which addresses the challenge of discrete input space and is easily adapted to general natural language processing (NLP) tasks. In particular, we propose a tree-based autoencoder to encode discrete text data into continuous vector space, upon which we optimize the adversarial perturbation. A tree-based decoder is then applied to ensure the grammar correctness of the generated text. It also enables the flexibility of making manipulations on different levels of text, such as sentence (AdvCodec(sent)) and word (AdvCodec(word)) levels. We consider multiple attacking scenarios, including appending an adversarial sentence or adding unnoticeable words to a given paragraph, to achieve the arbitrary targeted attack. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we consider two most representative NLP tasks: sentiment analysis and question answering (QA). Extensive experimental results and human studies show that AdvCodec generated adversarial text can successfully attack the neural models without misleading the human. In particular, our attack causes a BERT-based sentiment classifier accuracy to drop from 0.703$ to 0.006, and a BERT-based QA model's F1 score to drop from 88.62 to 33.21 (with best targeted attack F1 score as 46.54). Furthermore, we show that the white-box generated adversarial texts can transfer across other black-box models, shedding light on an effective way to examine the robustness of existing NLP models.

Includes members:
  Member "achieving verified robustness to symbol substitutions via interval bound propagation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "robustness verification for transformers")
  Member "universal adversarial triggers for attacking and analyzing nlp":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "is bert really robust a strong baseline for natural language attack on text classification and entailment":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "gradient based adversarial attacks on categorical sequence models via traversing an embedded world")
  Member "adversarial example generation with syntactically controlled paraphrase networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "stress test evaluation of transformer based models in natural language understanding tasks")
  Member "textbugger generating adversarial text against real world applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "advbox a toolbox to generate adversarial examples that fool neural networks")
  Member "deep text classification can be fooled":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "humpty dumpty controlling word meanings via corpus poisoning")
  Member "generating natural language adversarial examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "humpty dumpty controlling word meanings via corpus poisoning")
  Member "seq2sick evaluating the robustness of sequence to sequence models with adversarial examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "robustness verification for transformers")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)