human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "adversarially robust learning could leverage computational hardness"):
  Abstract: Over recent years, devising classification algorithms that are robust to adversarial perturbations has emerged as a challenging problem. In particular, deep neural nets (DNNs) seem to be susceptible to small imperceptible changes over test instances. However, the line of work in provable robustness, so far, has been focused on information-theoretic robustness, ruling out even the existence of any adversarial examples. In this work, we study whether there is a hope to benefit from algorithmic nature of an attacker that searches for adversarial examples, and ask whether there is any learning task for which it is possible to design classifiers that are only robust against polynomial-time adversaries. Indeed, numerous cryptographic tasks can only be secure against computationally bounded adversaries, and are indeed impossible for computationally unbounded attackers. Thus, it is natural to ask if the same strategy could help robust learning. #R##N#We show that computational limitation of attackers can indeed be useful in robust learning by demonstrating the possibility of a classifier for some learning task for which computational and information theoretic adversaries of bounded perturbations have very different power. Namely, while computationally unbounded adversaries can attack successfully and find adversarial examples with small perturbation, polynomial time adversaries are unable to do so unless they can break standard cryptographic hardness assumptions. Our results, therefore, indicate that perhaps a similar approach to cryptography (relying on computational hardness) holds promise for achieving computationally robust machine learning. On the reverse directions, we also show that the existence of such learning task in which computational robustness beats information theoretic robustness requires computational hardness by implying (average-case) hardness of NP.

Includes members:
  Member "lower bounds for adversarially robust pac learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "more data can expand the generalization gap between adversarially robust and standard models")
  Member "vc classes are adversarially robustly learnable but only improperly":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "more data can expand the generalization gap between adversarially robust and standard models")
  Member "scaling provable adversarial defenses":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")
  Member "the curse of concentration in robust learning evasion and poisoning attacks from concentration of measure":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "utilizing network properties to detect erroneous inputs")
  Member "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence")
  Member "can adversarially robust learning leverage computational hardness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "adversarial spheres":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "utilizing network properties to detect erroneous inputs")
  Member "adversarial vulnerability for any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "utilizing network properties to detect erroneous inputs")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)