human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "perils and challenges of social media and election manipulation analysis the 2018 us midterms"):
  Abstract: One of the hallmarks of a free and fair society is the ability to conduct a peaceful and seamless transfer of power from one leader to another. Democratically, this is measured in a citizen population's trust in the electoral system of choosing a representative government. In view of the well documented issues of the 2016 US Presidential election, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the 2018 US Midterm elections looking specifically for voter fraud or suppression. The Midterm election occurs in the middle of a 4 year presidential term. For the 2018 midterms, 35 senators and all the 435 seats in the House of Representatives were up for re-election, thus, every congressional district and practically every state had a federal election. In order to collect election related tweets, we analyzed Twitter during the month prior to, and the two weeks following, the November 6, 2018 election day. In a targeted analysis to detect statistical anomalies or election interference, we identified several biases that can lead to wrong conclusions. Specifically, we looked for divergence between actual voting outcomes and instances of the #ivoted hashtag on the election day. This analysis highlighted three states of concern: New York, California, and Texas. We repeated our analysis discarding malicious accounts, such as social bots. Upon further inspection and against a backdrop of collected general election-related tweets, we identified some confounding factors, such as population bias, or bot and political ideology inference, that can lead to false conclusions. We conclude by providing an in-depth discussion of the perils and challenges of using social media data to explore questions about election manipulation.

Includes members:
  Member "influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "topology comparison of twitter diffusion networks effectively reveals misleading information")
  Member "senator we sell ads analysis of the 2016 russian facebook ads campaign":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "don t feed the troll detecting troll behavior via inverse reinforcement learning")
  Member "analyzing the digital traces of political manipulation the 2016 russian interference twitter campaign":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "don t feed the troll detecting troll behavior via inverse reinforcement learning")
  Member "deep neural networks for bot detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "don t feed the troll detecting troll behavior via inverse reinforcement learning")
  Member "who falls for online political manipulation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "don t feed the troll detecting troll behavior via inverse reinforcement learning")
  Member "the spread of low credibility content by social bots":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "topology comparison of twitter diffusion networks effectively reveals misleading information")
  Member "fake news detection on social media a data mining perspective":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "benchmark performance of machine and deep learning based methodologies for urdu text document classification")
  Member "early detection of promoted campaigns on social media":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "don t feed the troll detecting troll behavior via inverse reinforcement learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)