human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "robust comparison in population protocols"):
  Abstract: There has recently been a surge of interest in the computational and complexity properties of the population model, which assumes $n$ anonymous, computationally-bounded nodes, interacting at random, and attempting to jointly compute global predicates. In particular, a significant amount of work, has gone towards investigating majority and consensus dynamics in this model: assuming that each node is initially in one of two states $X$ or $Y$, determine which state had higher initial count. #R##N#In this paper, we consider a natural generalization of majority/consensus, which we call comparison. We are given two baseline states, $X_0$ and $Y_0$, present in any initial configuration in fixed, possibly small counts. Importantly, one of these states has higher count than the other: we will assume $|X_0| \ge C |Y_0|$ for some constant $C$. The challenge is to design a protocol which can quickly and reliably decide on which of the baseline states $X_0$ and $Y_0$ has higher initial count. #R##N#We propose a simple algorithm solving comparison: the baseline algorithm uses $O(\log n)$ states per node, and converges in $O(\log n)$ (parallel) time, with high probability, to a state where whole population votes on opinions $X$ or $Y$ at rates proportional to initial $|X_0|$ vs. $|Y_0|$ concentrations. We then describe how such output can be then used to solve comparison. The algorithm is self-stabilizing, in the sense that it converges to the correct decision even if the relative counts of baseline states $X_0$ and $Y_0$ change dynamically during the execution, and leak-robust, in the sense that it can withstand spurious faulty reactions. Our analysis relies on a new martingale concentration result which relates the evolution of a population protocol to its expected (steady-state) analysis, which should be broadly applicable in the context of population protocols and opinion dynamics.

Includes members:
  Member "majority stabilization in population protocols":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "fast space optimal leader election in population protocols":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "noidy conmunixatipn on the convergence of the averaging population protocol")
  Member "robust detection in leak prone population protocols":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "democratic existential and consensus based output conventions in stable computation by chemical reaction networks")
  Member "space optimal majority in population protocols":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "popsgd decentralized stochastic gradient descent in the population model")
  Member "time space trade offs in population protocols":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "popsgd decentralized stochastic gradient descent in the population model")
  Member "determining majority in networks with local interactions and very small local memory":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the power of global knowledge on self stabilizing population protocols")
  Member "passively mobile communicating machines that use restricted space":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "almost logarithmic time space optimal leader election in population protocols")
  Member "the computational power of population protocols":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "distributed computation and reconfiguration in actively dynamic networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)