human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "generalizing energy based generative convnets from particle evolution perspective"):
  Abstract: Compared with Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), the Energy-Based generative Model (EBM) possesses two appealing properties: i) it can be directly optimized without requiring an auxiliary network during the learning and synthesizing; ii) it can better approximate underlying distribution of the observed data by learning explicitly potential functions. This paper studies a branch of EBMs, i.e., the energy-based Generative ConvNet (GCN), which minimizes its energy function defined by a bottom-up ConvNet. From the perspective of particle physics, we solve the problem of unstable energy dissipation that might damage the quality of the synthesized samples during the maximum likelihood learning. Specifically, we establish a connection between FRAME model [1] and dynamic physics process and provide a generalized formulation of FRAME in discrete flow with a certain metric measure from particle perspective. To address KL-vanishing issue, we generalize the reformulated GCN from the KL discrete flow with KL divergence measure to a Jordan-Kinderleher-Otto (JKO) discrete flow with Wasserastein distance metric and derive a Wasserastein GCN (w-GCN). To further minimize the learning bias and improve the model generalization, we present a Generalized GCN (GGCN). GGCN introduces a hidden space mapping strategy and employs a normal distribution as hidden space for the reference distribution. Besides, it applies a matching trainable non-linear upsampling function for further generalization. Considering the limitation of the efficiency problem in MCMC based learning of EBMs, an amortized learning are also proposed to improve the learning efficiency. Quantitative and qualitative experiments are conducted on several widely-used face and natural image datasets. Our experimental results surpass those of the existing models in both model stability and the quality of generated samples.

Includes members:
  Member "frame revisited an interpretation view based on particle evolution":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "gans trained by a two time scale update rule converge to a nash equilibrium":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "transformation based adversarial video prediction on large scale data")
  Member "wasserstein introspective neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reusing discriminators for encoding towards unsupervised image to image translation")
  Member "density estimation using real nvp":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "improved techniques for training gans":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "deep directed generative models with energy based probability estimation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "your gan is secretly an energy based model and you should use discriminator driven latent sampling")
  Member "unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "lsun construction of a large scale image dataset using deep learning with humans in the loop":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)