human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "revenue relevance arbitrage and more joint optimization framework for search experiences in two sided marketplaces"):
  Abstract: Two-sided marketplaces such as eBay, Etsy and Taobao have two distinct groups of customers: buyers who use the platform to seek the most relevant and interesting item to purchase and sellers who view the same platform as a tool to reach out to their audience and grow their business. Additionally, platforms have their own objectives ranging from growing both buyer and seller user bases to revenue maximization. It is not difficult to see that it would be challenging to obtain a globally favorable outcome for all parties. Taking the search experience as an example, any interventions are likely to impact either buyers or sellers unfairly to course correct for a greater perceived need. In this paper, we address how a company-aligned search experience can be provided with competing business metrics that E-commerce companies typically tackle. As far as we know, this is a pioneering work to consider multiple different aspects of business indicators in two-sided marketplaces to optimize a search experience. We demonstrate that many problems are difficult or impossible to decompose down to credit assigned scores on individual documents, rendering traditional methods inadequate. Instead, we express market-level metrics as constraints and discuss to what degree multiple potentially conflicting metrics can be tuned to business needs. We further explore the use of policy learners in the form of Evolutionary Strategies to jointly optimize both group-level and market-level metrics simultaneously, side-stepping traditional cascading methods and manual interventions. We empirically evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method on Etsy data and demonstrate its potential with insights.

Includes members:
  Member "back to basics benchmarking canonical evolution strategies for playing atari":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "assuring the machine learning lifecycle desiderata methods and challenges")
  Member "reinforcement learning to rank in e commerce search engine formalization analysis and application":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "online similarity learning with feedback for invoice line item matching")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)