human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "discovering the compositional structure of vector representations with role learning networks"):
  Abstract: Neural networks (NNs) are able to perform tasks that rely on compositional structure even though they lack obvious mechanisms for representing this structure. To analyze the internal representations that enable such success, we propose ROLE, a technique that detects whether these representations implicitly encode symbolic structure. ROLE learns to approximate the representations of a target encoder E by learning a symbolic constituent structure and an embedding of that structure into E's representational vector space. The constituents of the approximating symbol structure are defined by structural positions --- roles --- that can be filled by symbols. We show that when E is constructed to explicitly embed a particular type of structure (string or tree), ROLE successfully extracts the ground-truth roles defining that structure. We then analyze a GRU seq2seq network trained to perform a more complex compositional task (SCAN), where there is no ground truth role scheme available. For this model, ROLE successfully discovers an interpretable symbolic structure that the model implicitly uses to perform the SCAN task, providing a comprehensive account of the representations that drive the behavior of a frequently-used but hard-to-interpret type of model. We verify the causal importance of the discovered symbolic structure by showing that, when we systematically manipulate hidden embeddings based on this symbolic structure, the model's resulting output is changed in the way predicted by our analysis. Finally, we use ROLE to explore whether popular sentence embedding models are capturing compositional structure and find evidence that they are not; we conclude by discussing how insights from ROLE can be used to impart new inductive biases to improve the compositional abilities of such models.

Includes members:
  Member "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial filters of dataset biases")
  Member "the compositionality of neural networks integrating symbolism and connectionism":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "capacity bandwidth and compositionality in emergent language learning")
  Member "correlating neural and symbolic representations of language":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "probing natural language inference models through semantic fragments")
  Member "measuring compositionality in representation learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networks")
  Member "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "analyzing machine learned representations a natural language case study":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "blackbox meets blackbox representational similarity and stability analysis of neural language models and brains":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "semantic drift in multilingual representations")
  Member "collecting diverse natural language inference problems for sentence representation evaluation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "commonsense reasoning for natural language understanding a survey of benchmarks resources and approaches")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)