human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deep learning on edge extracting field boundaries from satellite images with a convolutional neural network"):
  Abstract: Applications of digital agricultural services often require either farmers or their advisers to provide digital records of their field boundaries. Automatic extraction of field boundaries from satellite imagery would reduce the reliance on manual input of these records which is time consuming and error-prone, and would underpin the provision of remote products and services. The lack of current field boundary data sets seems to indicate low uptake of existing methods,presumably because of expensive image preprocessing requirements and local, often arbitrary, tuning. In this paper, we address the problem of field boundary extraction from satellite images as a multitask semantic segmentation problem. We used ResUNet-a, a deep convolutional neural network with a fully connected UNet backbone that features dilated convolutions and conditioned inference, to assign three labels to each pixel: 1) the probability of belonging to a field; 2) the probability of being part of a boundary; and 3) the distance to the closest boundary. These labels can then be combined to obtain closed field boundaries. Using a single composite image from Sentinel-2, the model was highly accurate in mapping field extent, field boundaries, and, consequently, individual fields. Replacing the monthly composite with a single-date image close to the compositing period only marginally decreased accuracy. We then showed in a series of experiments that our model generalised well across resolutions, sensors, space and time without recalibration. Building consensus by averaging model predictions from at least four images acquired across the season is the key to coping with the temporal variations of accuracy. By minimising image preprocessing requirements and replacing local arbitrary decisions by data-driven ones, our approach is expected to facilitate the extraction of individual crop fields at scale.

Includes members:
  Member "resunet a a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "fully convolutional architectures for multi class segmentation in chest radiographs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "resunet a a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed data")
  Member "an overview of multi task learning in deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")
  Member "identity mappings in deep residual networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")
  Member "deeplab semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets atrous convolution and fully connected crfs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "relationship embedded representation learning for grounding referring expressions")
  Member "v net fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "pyramid scene parsing network":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "attention guided chained context aggregation for semantic segmentation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)