human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "replication can improve prior results a github study of pull request acceptance"):
  Abstract: Crowdsourcing and data mining can be used to effectively reduce the effort associated with the partial replication and enhancement of qualitative studies. #R##N#For example, in a primary study, other researchers explored factors influencing the fate of GitHub pull requests using an extensive qualitative analysis of 20 pull requests. Guided by their findings, we mapped some of their qualitative insights onto quantitative questions. To determine how well their findings generalize, we collected much more data (170 additional pull requests from 142 GitHub projects). Using crowdsourcing, that data was augmented with subjective qualitative human opinions about how pull requests extended the original issue. The crowd's answers were then combined with quantitative features and, using data mining, used to build a predictor for whether code would be merged. That predictor was far more accurate that one built from the primary study's qualitative factors (F1=90 vs 68\%), illustrating the value of a mixed-methods approach and replication to improve prior results. #R##N#To test the generality of this approach, the next step in future work is to conduct other studies that extend qualitative studies with crowdsourcing and data mining.

Includes members:
  Member "trends in topics in software engineering conferences 1992 to 2016":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bad smells in software analytics papers")
  Member "tuning for software analytics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "how to improve ai tools by adding in se knowledge experiments with the timelime defect reduction tool")
  Member "continuous integration in a social coding world empirical evidence from github":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "continuous integration theater")
  Member "an insight into the pull requests of github":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "which pull requests get accepted and why a study of popular npm packages")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SE(Software Engineering)