human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "theory iii dynamics and generalization in deep networks a simple solution"):
  Abstract: We review recent observations on the dynamical systems induced by gradient descent (GD) methods used for training deep networks and summarize properties of the solutions they converge to. Recent results illuminate the absence of overfitting in the special case of linear networks for binary classification. They prove that minimization of loss functions such as the logistic, the cross-entropy and the exponential loss yields asymptotic convergence to the maximum margin solution for linearly separable datasets, independently of the initial conditions. Here we discuss the case of nonlinear DNNs near zero minima of the empirical loss, under exponential-type and square losses, for several variations of the basic GD algorithm, including a new NMGD version that converges to the minimum norm fixed points. Our main results are: 1) GD algorithms with weight normalization constraint achieve generalization; 2) the fundamental reason for the effectiveness of existing weight and batch normalization techniques is that they are approximate implementations of maximizing the margin under unit norm constraint; 3) even without explicit unit norm constraints, generalization can still be obtained for not-too-deep networks because standard GD is intrinsically consistent with the dynamics of normalized weights. In addition, the balance of the weights across different layers, if present at initialization, is maintained by the gradient flow. In the perspective of these theoretical results, we discuss experimental evidence around the apparent absence of overfitting, that is the observation that the expected classification error does not get worse when increasing the number of parameters. Our explanation focuses on the implicit normalization enforced by algorithms such as batch normalization. In particular, the control of the norm of the weights is related to Halpern iterations for minimum norm solutions.

Includes members:
  Member "mean field limit of the learning dynamics of multilayer neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a rigorous framework for the mean field limit of multilayer neural networks")
  Member "gradient descent maximizes the margin of homogeneous neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "mean field analysis of two layer neural networks non asymptotic rates and generalization bounds")
  Member "fine grained analysis of optimization and generalization for overparameterized two layer neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "disentangling adaptive gradient methods from learning rates")
  Member "loss landscapes of regularized linear autoencoders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a linear systems theory of normalizing flows")
  Member "learning and generalization in overparameterized neural networks going beyond two layers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "gradient descent finds global minima of deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "learning overparameterized neural networks via stochastic gradient descent on structured data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "algorithmic regularization in learning deep homogeneous models layers are automatically balanced":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "on the global convergence of training deep linear resnets")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)