human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "unbiased evaluation of ranking metrics reveals consistent performance in science and technology citation data"):
  Abstract: Despite the increasing use of citation-based metrics for research evaluation purposes, we do not know yet which metrics best deliver on their promise to gauge the significance of a scientific paper or a patent. We assess 17 network-based metrics by their ability to identify milestone papers and patents in three large citation datasets. We find that traditional information-retrieval evaluation metrics are strongly affected by the interplay between the age distribution of the milestone items and age biases of the evaluated metrics. Outcomes of these metrics are therefore not representative of the metrics' ranking ability. We argue in favor of a modified evaluation procedure that explicitly penalizes biased metrics and allows us to reveal metrics' performance patterns that are consistent across the datasets. PageRank and LeaderRank turn out to be the best-performing ranking metrics when their age bias is suppressed by a simple transformation of the scores that they produce, whereas other popular metrics, including citation count, HITS and Collective Influence, produce significantly worse ranking results.

Includes members:
  Member "influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "topology comparison of twitter diffusion networks effectively reveals misleading information")
  Member "early identification of important patents design and validation of citation network metrics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "bias amplification in artificial intelligence systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "implications of computer vision driven assistive technologies towards individuals with visual impairment")
  Member "a review of theory and practice in scientometrics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "how well does i3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators the convergent validity of several field normalized indicators")
  Member "a review of the literature on citation impact indicators":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "comparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals")
  Member "methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics which method best reflects the judgements of experts":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "an evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact and a proposal for making them better")
  Member "coauthorship and citation patterns in the physical review":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "predicting research trends with semantic and neural networks with an application in quantum physics")
  Member "the use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data opportunities and limits":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "an evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact and a proposal for making them better")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)