human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "privacy attacks on network embeddings"):
  Abstract: Data ownership and data protection are increasingly important topics with ethical and legal implications, e.g., with the right to erasure established in the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In this light, we investigate network embeddings, i.e., the representation of network nodes as low-dimensional vectors. We consider a typical social network scenario with nodes representing users and edges relationships between them. We assume that a network embedding of the nodes has been trained. After that, a user demands the removal of his data, requiring the full deletion of the corresponding network information, in particular the corresponding node and incident edges. In that setting, we analyze whether after the removal of the node from the network and the deletion of the vector representation of the respective node in the embedding significant information about the link structure of the removed node is still encoded in the embedding vectors of the remaining nodes. This would require a (potentially computationally expensive) retraining of the embedding. For that purpose, we deploy an attack that leverages information from the remaining network and embedding to recover information about the neighbors of the removed node. The attack is based on (i) measuring distance changes in network embeddings and (ii) a machine learning classifier that is trained on networks that are constructed by removing additional nodes. Our experiments demonstrate that substantial information about the edges of a removed node/user can be retrieved across many different datasets. This implies that to fully protect the privacy of users, node deletion requires complete retraining - or at least a significant modification - of original network embeddings. Our results suggest that deleting the corresponding vector representation from network embeddings alone is not sufficient from a privacy perspective.

Includes members:
  Member "towards demystifying membership inference attacks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "data and model dependencies of membership inference attack")
  Member "graph embedding techniques applications and performance a survey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "algorithms that remember model inversion attacks and data protection law":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "bias in data driven ai systems an introductory survey")
  Member "ml leaks model and data independent membership inference attacks and defenses on machine learning models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "dynamic backdoor attacks against machine learning models")
  Member "sok security and privacy in machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "a comprehensive survey of graph embedding problems techniques and applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "learning to segment 3d point clouds in 2d image space")
  Member "node2vec scalable feature learning for networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "deep graph matching consensus")
  Member "semi supervised classification with graph convolutional networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)