human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "privacy preserving crowd guided ai decision making in ethical dilemmas"):
  Abstract: With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), ethical issues surrounding AI have attracted increasing attention. In particular, autonomous vehicles may face moral dilemmas in accident scenarios, such as staying the course resulting in hurting pedestrians or swerving leading to hurting passengers. To investigate such ethical dilemmas, recent studies have adopted preference aggregation, in which each voter expresses her/his preferences over decisions for the possible ethical dilemma scenarios, and a centralized system aggregates these preferences to obtain the winning decision. Although a useful methodology for building ethical AI systems, such an approach can potentially violate the privacy of voters since moral preferences are sensitive information and their disclosure can be exploited by malicious parties resulting in negative consequences. In this paper, we report a first-of-its-kind privacy-preserving crowd-guided AI decision-making approach in ethical dilemmas. We adopt the formal and popular notion of differential privacy to quantify privacy, and consider four granularities of privacy protection by taking voter-/record-level privacy protection and centralized/distributed perturbation into account, resulting in four approaches VLCP, RLCP, VLDP, and RLDP, respectively. Moreover, we propose different algorithms to achieve these privacy protection granularities, while retaining the accuracy of the learned moral preference model. Specifically, VLCP and RLCP are implemented with the data aggregator setting a universal privacy parameter and perturbing the averaged moral preference to protect the privacy of voters' data. VLDP and RLDP are implemented in such a way that each voter perturbs her/his local moral preference with a personalized privacy parameter. Extensive experiments based on both synthetic data and real-world data of voters' moral decisions demonstrate that the proposed approaches achieve high accuracy of preference aggregation while protecting individual voter's privacy.

Includes members:
  Member "collecting and analyzing multidimensional data with local differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "locally private distributed reinforcement learning")
  Member "mathematical notions vs human perception of fairness a descriptive approach to fairness for machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "deep tractable probabilistic models for moral responsibility":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "building ethics into artificial intelligence":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "bias in data driven ai systems an introductory survey")
  Member "privacy loss in apple s implementation of differential privacy on macos 10 12":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "encode shuffle analyze privacy revisited formalizations and empirical evaluation")
  Member "a voting based system for ethical decision making":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "mathematical notions vs human perception of fairness a descriptive approach to fairness for machine learning")
  Member "the social dilemma of autonomous vehicles":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "task motion planning for safe and efficient urban driving")
  Member "rappor randomized aggregatable privacy preserving ordinal response":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)