human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "interpretability with accurate small models"):
  Abstract: Models often need to be constrained to a certain size for them to be considered interpretable. For example, a decision tree of depth 5 is much easier to understand than one of depth 50. Limiting model size, however, often reduces accuracy. We suggest a practical technique that minimizes this trade-off between interpretability and classification accuracy. This enables an arbitrary learning algorithm to produce highly accurate small-sized models. Our technique identifies the training data distribution to learn from that leads to the highest accuracy for a model of a given size. #R##N#We represent the training distribution as a combination of sampling schemes. Each scheme is defined by a parameterized probability mass function applied to the segmentation produced by a decision tree. An Infinite Mixture Model with Beta components is used to represent a combination of such schemes. The mixture model parameters are learned using Bayesian Optimization. Under simplistic assumptions, we would need to optimize for $O(d)$ variables for a distribution over a $d$-dimensional input space, which is cumbersome for most real-world data. However, we show that our technique significantly reduces this number to a \emph{fixed set of eight variables} at the cost of relatively cheap preprocessing. The proposed technique is flexible: it is \emph{model-agnostic}, i.e., it may be applied to the learning algorithm for any model family, and it admits a general notion of model size. We demonstrate its effectiveness using multiple real-world datasets to construct decision trees, linear probability models and gradient boosted models with different sizes. We observe significant improvements in the F1-score in most instances, exceeding an improvement of $100\%$ in some cases.

Includes members:
  Member "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "interpretable neural predictions with differentiable binary variables":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning world graphs to accelerate hierarchical reinforcement learning")
  Member "a unified approach to interpreting model predictions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "the promise and peril of human evaluation for model interpretability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "explainability fact sheets a framework for systematic assessment of explainable approaches")
  Member "hyperband a novel bandit based approach to hyperparameter optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "the mythos of model interpretability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "a tutorial on bayesian optimization of expensive cost functions with application to active user modeling and hierarchical reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "benchmark and survey of automated machine learning frameworks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)