human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "gan vs jpeg2000 image compression for distributed automotive perception higher peak snr does not mean better semantic segmentation"):
  Abstract: The high amount of sensors required for autonomous driving poses enormous challenges on the capacity of automotive bus systems. There is a need to understand tradeoffs between bitrate and perception performance. In this paper, we compare the image compression standards JPEG, JPEG2000, and WebP to a modern encoder/decoder image compression approach based on generative adversarial networks (GANs). We evaluate both the pure compression performance using typical metrics such as peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM) and others, but also the performance of a subsequent perception function, namely a semantic segmentation (characterized by the mean intersection over union (mIoU) measure). Not surprisingly, for all investigated compression methods, a higher bitrate means better results in all investigated quality metrics. Interestingly, however, we show that the semantic segmentation mIoU of the GAN autoencoder in the highly relevant low-bitrate regime (at 0.0625 bit/pixel) is better by 3.9% absolute than JPEG2000, although the latter still is considerably better in terms of PSNR (5.91 dB difference). This effect can greatly be enlarged by training the semantic segmentation model with images originating from the decoder, so that the mIoU using the segmentation model trained by GAN reconstructions exceeds the use of the model trained with original images by almost 20% absolute. We conclude that distributed perception in future autonomous driving will most probably not provide a solution to the automotive bus capacity bottleneck by using standard compression schemes such as JPEG2000, but requires modern coding approaches, with the GAN encoder/decoder method being a promising candidate.

Includes members:
  Member "generative adversarial networks for extreme learned image compression":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "learning to structure an image with few colors")
  Member "semantic aware grad gan for virtual to real urban scene adaption":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "can giraffes become birds an evaluation of image to image translation for data generation")
  Member "defense gan protecting classifiers against adversarial attacks using generative models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "the perception distortion tradeoff":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "softmax splatting for video frame interpolation")
  Member "generating adversarial examples with adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "category wise attack transferable adversarial examples for anchor free object detection")
  Member "began boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "gans trained by a two time scale update rule converge to a nash equilibrium":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "transformation based adversarial video prediction on large scale data")
  Member "unpaired image to image translation using cycle consistent adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)