human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "inverse graph learning over optimization networks"):
  Abstract: Many inferential and learning tasks can be accomplished efficiently by means of distributed optimization algorithms where the network topology plays a critical role in driving the local interactions among neighboring agents. There is a large body of literature examining the effect of the graph structure on the performance of optimization strategies. In this article, we examine the inverse problem and consider the reverse question: How much information does observing the behavior at the nodes convey about the underlying network structure used for optimization? Over large-scale networks, the difficulty of addressing such inverse questions (or problems) is compounded by the fact that usually only a limited portion of nodes can be probed, giving rise to a second important question: Despite the presence of several unobserved nodes, are partial and local observations still sufficient to discover the graph linking the probed nodes? The article surveys recent advances on this inverse learning problem and related questions. Examples of applications are provided to illustrate how the interplay between graph learning and distributed optimization arises in practice, e.g., in cognitive engineered systems such as distributed detection, or in other real-world problems such as the mechanism of opinion formation over social networks and the mechanism of coordination in biological networks. A unifying framework for examining the reconstruction error will be described, which allows to devise and examine various estimation strategies enabling successful graph learning. The relevance of specific network attributes, such as sparsity versus density of connections, and node degree concentration, is discussed in relation to the topology inference goal. It is shown how universal (i.e., data-driven) clustering algorithms can be exploited to solve the graph learning problem.

Includes members:
  Member "learning graphs from data a signal representation perspective":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "graph signal processing part iii machine learning on graphs from graph topology to applications")
  Member "interplay between topology and social learning over weak graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "local tomography of large networks under the low observability regime":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning graph influence from social interactions")
  Member "consistent tomography under partial observations over adaptive networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning graph influence from social interactions")
  Member "signal processing on graphs causal modeling of un structured data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "learning graphs from data a signal representation perspective")
  Member "network inference from consensus dynamics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "exact blind community detection from signals on multiple graphs")
  Member "stationary signal processing on graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "predicting graph signals using kernel regression where the input signal is agnostic to a graph")
  Member "stationary graph processes and spectral estimation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "predicting graph signals using kernel regression where the input signal is agnostic to a graph")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.MA(Multiagent Systems)