human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "weak supervision helps emergence of word object alignment and improves vision language tasks"):
  Abstract: The large adoption of the self-attention (i.e. transformer model) and BERT-like training principles has recently resulted in a number of high performing models on a large panoply of vision-and-language problems (such as Visual Question Answering (VQA), image retrieval, etc.). In this paper we claim that these State-Of-The-Art (SOTA) approaches perform reasonably well in structuring information inside a single modality but, despite their impressive performances , they tend to struggle to identify fine-grained inter-modality relationships. Indeed, such relations are frequently assumed to be implicitly learned during training from application-specific losses, mostly cross-entropy for classification. While most recent works provide inductive bias for inter-modality relationships via cross attention modules, in this work, we demonstrate (1) that the latter assumption does not hold, i.e. modality alignment does not necessarily emerge automatically, and (2) that adding weak supervision for alignment between visual objects and words improves the quality of the learned models on tasks requiring reasoning. In particular , we integrate an object-word alignment loss into SOTA vision-language reasoning models and evaluate it on two tasks VQA and Language-driven Comparison of Images. We show that the proposed fine-grained inter-modality supervision significantly improves performance on both tasks. In particular, this new learning signal allows obtaining SOTA-level performances on GQA dataset (VQA task) with pre-trained models without finetuning on the task, and a new SOTA on NLVR2 dataset (Language-driven Comparison of Images). Finally, we also illustrate the impact of the contribution on the models reasoning by visualizing attention distributions.

Includes members:
  Member "lxmert learning cross modality encoder representations from transformers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "bert can see out of the box on the cross modal transferability of text representations")
  Member "uniter learning universal image text representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "in defense of grid features for visual question answering")
  Member "learning by abstraction the neural state machine":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "unbiased scene graph generation from biased training")
  Member "block bilinear superdiagonal fusion for visual question answering and visual relationship detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "counterfactual samples synthesizing for robust visual question answering")
  Member "language conditioned graph networks for relational reasoning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "unshuffling data for improved generalization")
  Member "gqa a new dataset for real world visual reasoning and compositional question answering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "unbiased scene graph generation from biased training")
  Member "vilbert pretraining task agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision and language tasks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "bert can see out of the box on the cross modal transferability of text representations")
  Member "deep modular co attention networks for visual question answering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "in defense of grid features for visual question answering")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)