human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "lc gan image to image translation based on generative adversarial network for endoscopic images"):
  Abstract: The intelligent perception of endoscopic vision is appealing in many computer-assisted and robotic surgeries. Achieving good vision-based analysis with deep learning techniques requires large labeled datasets, but manual data labeling is expensive and time-consuming in medical problems. When applying a trained model to a different but relevant dataset, a new labeled dataset may be required for training to avoid performance degradation. In this work, we investigate a novel cross-domain strategy to reduce the need for manual data labeling by proposing an image-to-image translation model called live-cadaver GAN (LC-GAN) based on generative adversarial networks (GANs). More specifically, we consider a situation when a labeled cadaveric surgery dataset is available while the task is instrument segmentation on a live surgery dataset. We train LC-GAN to learn the mappings between the cadaveric and live datasets. To achieve instrument segmentation on live images, we can first translate the live images to fake-cadaveric images with LC-GAN, and then perform segmentation on the fake-cadaveric images with models trained on the real cadaveric dataset. With this cross-domain strategy, we fully leverage the labeled cadaveric dataset for segmentation on live images without the need to label the live dataset again. Two generators with different architectures are designed for LC-GAN to make use of the deep feature representation learned from the cadaveric image based instrument segmentation task. Moreover, we propose structural similarity loss and segmentation consistency loss to improve the semantic consistency during translation. The results demonstrate that LC-GAN achieves better image-to-image translation results, and leads to improved segmentation performance in the proposed cross-domain segmentation task.

Includes members:
  Member "2018 robotic scene segmentation challenge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "towards better surgical instrument segmentation in endoscopic vision multi angle feature aggregation and contour supervision":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "attention guided lightweight network for real time segmentation of robotic surgical instruments":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "learning where to look while tracking instruments in robot assisted surgery":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "ap mtl attention pruned multi task learning model for real time instrument detection and segmentation in robot assisted surgery")
  Member "2017 robotic instrument segmentation challenge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ap mtl attention pruned multi task learning model for real time instrument detection and segmentation in robot assisted surgery")
  Member "not so supervised a survey of semi supervised multi instance and transfer learning in medical image analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a survey on semi self and unsupervised techniques in image classification")
  Member "multimodal unsupervised image to image translation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "transformation based adversarial video prediction on large scale data")
  Member "automatic instrument segmentation in robot assisted surgery using deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "ap mtl attention pruned multi task learning model for real time instrument detection and segmentation in robot assisted surgery")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)