human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "combinatorial bandits with full bandit feedback sample complexity and regret minimization"):
  Abstract: Combinatorial Bandits generalize multi-armed bandits, where k out of n arms are chosen at each round and the sum of the rewards is gained. We address the full-bandit feedback, in which the agent observes only the sum of rewards, in contrast to the semi-bandit feedback, in which the agent observes also the individual arms' rewards. We present the Combinatorial Successive Accepts and Rejects (CSAR) algorithm, which is a generalization of the SAR algorithm (Bubeck et al. 2013) for the combinatorial setting. Our main contribution is an efficient sampling scheme that uses Hadamard matrices in order to estimate accurately the individual arms' expected rewards. We discuss two variants of the algorithm, the first minimizes the sample complexity and the second minimizes the regret. For the sample complexity we also prove a matching lower bound that shows it is optimal. For the regret minimization, we prove a lower bound which is tight up to a factor of k. Finally, we run experiments and show that our algorithm outperforms other methods.

Includes members:
  Member "polynomial time algorithms for combinatorial pure exploration with full bandit feedback":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "top k combinatorial bandits with full bandit feedback")
  Member "introduction to multi armed bandits":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "effective diversity in population based reinforcement learning")
  Member "regret bounds for stochastic combinatorial multi armed bandits with linear space complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "thompson sampling for combinatorial network optimization in unknown environments")
  Member "tight bounds for bandit combinatorial optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "top k combinatorial bandits with full bandit feedback")
  Member "combinatorial multi armed bandit with general reward functions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "combinatorial semi bandit in the non stationary environment")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)