human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "controversial stimuli pitting neural networks against each other as models of human recognition"):
  Abstract: Distinct scientific theories can make similar predictions. To adjudicate between theories, we must design experiments for which the theories make distinct predictions. Here we consider the problem of comparing deep neural networks as models of human visual recognition. To efficiently determine which models better explain human responses, we synthesize controversial stimuli: images for which different models produce distinct responses. We tested nine different models, which employed different architectures and recognition algorithms, including discriminative and generative models, all trained to recognize handwritten digits (from the MNIST set of digit images). We synthesized controversial stimuli to maximize the disagreement among the models. Human subjects viewed hundreds of these stimuli and judged the probability of presence of each digit in each image. We quantified how accurately each model predicted the human judgements. We found that the generative models (which learn the distribution of images for each class) better predicted the human judgments than the discriminative models (which learn to directly map from images to labels). The best performing model was the generative Analysis-by-Synthesis model (based on variational autoencoders). However, a simpler generative model (based on Gaussian-kernel-density estimation) also performed better than each of the discriminative models. None of the candidate models fully explained the human responses. We discuss the advantages and limitations of controversial stimuli as an experimental paradigm and how they generalize and improve on adversarial examples as probes of discrepancies between models and human perception.

Includes members:
  Member "mnist c a robustness benchmark for computer vision":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "increasing the robustness of dnns against image corruptions by playing the game of noise")
  Member "conditional generative models are not robust":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "exact information bottleneck with invertible neural networks getting the best of discriminative and generative modeling")
  Member "benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "universal adversarial attack on attention and the resulting dataset damagenet")
  Member "detecting and diagnosing adversarial images with class conditional capsule reconstructions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "deflecting adversarial attacks")
  Member "humans can decipher adversarial images":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a hierarchy of limitations in machine learning")
  Member "deep predictive coding network for object recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "differential dynamic programming neural optimizer")
  Member "adversarial examples that fool both computer vision and time limited humans":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "mga momentum gradient attack on network")
  Member "towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on mnist":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "increasing the robustness of dnns against image corruptions by playing the game of noise")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)