human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "vanishing nodes another phenomenon that makes training deep neural networks difficult"):
  Abstract: It is well known that the problem of vanishing/exploding gradients is a challenge when training deep networks. In this paper, we describe another phenomenon, called vanishing nodes, that also increases the difficulty of training deep neural networks. As the depth of a neural network increases, the network's hidden nodes have more highly correlated behavior. This results in great similarities between these nodes. The redundancy of hidden nodes thus increases as the network becomes deeper. We call this problem vanishing nodes, and we propose the metric vanishing node indicator (VNI) for quantitatively measuring the degree of vanishing nodes. The VNI can be characterized by the network parameters, which is shown analytically to be proportional to the depth of the network and inversely proportional to the network width. The theoretical results show that the effective number of nodes vanishes to one when the VNI increases to one (its maximal value), and that vanishing/exploding gradients and vanishing nodes are two different challenges that increase the difficulty of training deep neural networks. The numerical results from the experiments suggest that the degree of vanishing nodes will become more evident during back-propagation training, and that when the VNI is equal to 1, the network cannot learn simple tasks (e.g. the XOR problem) even when the gradients are neither vanishing nor exploding. We refer to this kind of gradients as the walking dead gradients, which cannot help the network converge when having a relatively large enough scale. Finally, the experiments show that the likelihood of failed training increases as the depth of the network increases. The training will become much more difficult due to the lack of network representation capability.

Includes members:
  Member "resurrecting the sigmoid in deep learning through dynamical isometry theory and practice":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a comprehensive and modularized statistical framework for gradient norm equality in deep neural networks")
  Member "convolutional neural networks for medical image analysis full training or fine tuning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the future of digital health with federated learning")
  Member "identity mappings in deep residual networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")
  Member "google s neural machine translation system bridging the gap between human and machine translation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "automl zero evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch")
  Member "deep residual learning for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "mxnet a flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "attention guided chained context aggregation for semantic segmentation")
  Member "delving deep into rectifiers surpassing human level performance on imagenet classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "gradient surgery for multi task learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)