human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "multi criterion evolutionary design of deep convolutional neural networks"):
  Abstract: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the backbones of deep learning paradigms for numerous vision tasks. Early advancements in CNN architectures are primarily driven by human expertise and elaborate design. Recently, neural architecture search was proposed with the aim of automating the network design process and generating task-dependent architectures. While existing approaches have achieved competitive performance in image classification, they are not well suited under limited computational budget for two reasons: (1) the obtained architectures are either solely optimized for classification performance or only for one targeted resource requirement; (2) the search process requires vast computational resources in most approaches. To overcome this limitation, we propose an evolutionary algorithm for searching neural architectures under multiple objectives, such as classification performance and FLOPs. The proposed method addresses the first shortcoming by populating a set of architectures to approximate the entire Pareto frontier through genetic operations that recombine and modify architectural components progressively. Our approach improves the computation efficiency by carefully down-scaling the architectures during the search as well as reinforcing the patterns commonly shared among the past successful architectures through Bayesian Learning. The integration of these two main contributions allows an efficient design of architectures that are competitive and in many cases outperform both manually and automatically designed architectures on benchmark image classification datasets, CIFAR, ImageNet and human chest X-ray. The flexibility provided from simultaneously obtaining multiple architecture choices for different compute requirements further differentiates our approach from other methods in the literature.

Includes members:
  Member "random search and reproducibility for neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "automl zero evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch")
  Member "evolutionary neural automl for deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "neuroevolution of neural network architectures using codeepneat and keras")
  Member "searching for a robust neural architecture in four gpu hours":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning architectures for binary networks")
  Member "exploring randomly wired neural networks for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "automl zero evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch")
  Member "auto deeplab hierarchical neural architecture search for semantic image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "automl zero evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch")
  Member "benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "universal adversarial attack on attention and the resulting dataset damagenet")
  Member "do imagenet classifiers generalize to imagenet":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a large scale study of representation learning with the visual task adaptation benchmark")
  Member "mobilenetv2 inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)