human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "dast model deciding about semantic complexity of a text"):
  Abstract: Measuring text complexity is an essential task in several fields and applications (such as NLP, semantic web, smart education, etc.). The semantic layer of text is more tacit than its syntactic structure and, as a result, calculation of semantic complexity is more difficult than syntactic complexity. While there are famous and powerful academic and commercial syntactic complexity measures, the problem of measuring semantic complexity is still a challenging one. In this paper, we introduce the DAST model, which stands for Deciding About Semantic Complexity of a Text. DAST proposes an intuitionistic approach to semantics that lets us have a well-defined model for the semantics of a text and its complexity: semantic is considered as a lattice of intuitions and, as a result, semantic complexity is defined as the result of a calculation on this lattice. A set theoretic formal definition of semantic complexity, as a 6-tuple formal system, is provided. By using this formal system, a method for measuring semantic complexity is presented. The evaluation of the proposed approach is done by a set of three human-judgment experiments. The results show that DAST model is capable of deciding about semantic complexity of text. Furthermore, the analysis of the results leads us to introduce a Markovian model for the process of common-sense, multiple-steps and semantic-complexity reasoning in people. The results of Experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms the random baseline with improvement in better precision and competes with other methods by less error percentage.

Includes members:
  Member "the language of dialogue is complex":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "ten social dimensions of conversations and relationships")
  Member "a readable read automatic assessment of language learning materials based on linguistic complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "candidate sentence selection for language learning exercises from a comprehensive framework to an empirical evaluation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)