human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "nas evaluation is frustratingly hard"):
  Abstract: Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is an exciting new field which promises to be as much as a game-changer as Convolutional Neural Networks were in 2012. Despite many great works leading to substantial improvements on a variety of tasks, comparison between different methods is still very much an open issue. While most algorithms are tested on the same datasets, there is no shared experimental protocol followed by all. As such, and due to the under-use of ablation studies, there is a lack of clarity regarding why certain methods are more effective than others. Our first contribution is a benchmark of $8$ NAS methods on $5$ datasets. To overcome the hurdle of comparing methods with different search spaces, we propose using a method's relative improvement over the randomly sampled average architecture, which effectively removes advantages arising from expertly engineered search spaces or training protocols. Surprisingly, we find that many NAS techniques struggle to significantly beat the average architecture baseline. We perform further experiments with the commonly used DARTS search space in order to understand the contribution of each component in the NAS pipeline. These experiments highlight that: (i) the use of tricks in the evaluation protocol has a predominant impact on the reported performance of architectures; (ii) the cell-based search space has a very narrow accuracy range, such that the seed has a considerable impact on architecture rankings; (iii) the hand-designed macro-structure (cells) is more important than the searched micro-structure (operations); and (iv) the depth-gap is a real phenomenon, evidenced by the change in rankings between $8$ and $20$ cell architectures. To conclude, we suggest best practices, that we hope will prove useful for the community and help mitigate current NAS pitfalls. The code used is available at this https URL.

Includes members:
  Member "random search and reproducibility for neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "automl zero evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch")
  Member "sharpdarts faster and more accurate differentiable architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "single path mobile automl efficient convnet design and nas hyperparameter optimization")
  Member "exploring randomly wired neural networks for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "automl zero evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch")
  Member "xnas neural architecture search with expert advice":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "cifar 10 image classification using feature ensembles")
  Member "evaluating the search phase of neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "semi supervised neural architecture search")
  Member "manas multi agent neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "darts improved differentiable architecture search with early stopping":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "nas count counting by density with neural architecture search")
  Member "stacnas towards stable and consistent differentiable neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "fair darts eliminating unfair advantages in differentiable architecture search")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)