human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "scalable multi task imitation learning with autonomous improvement"):
  Abstract: While robot learning has demonstrated promising results for enabling robots to automatically acquire new skills, a critical challenge in deploying learning-based systems is scale: acquiring enough data for the robot to effectively generalize broadly. Imitation learning, in particular, has remained a stable and powerful approach for robot learning, but critically relies on expert operators for data collection. In this work, we target this challenge, aiming to build an imitation learning system that can continuously improve through autonomous data collection, while simultaneously avoiding the explicit use of reinforcement learning, to maintain the stability, simplicity, and scalability of supervised imitation. To accomplish this, we cast the problem of imitation with autonomous improvement into a multi-task setting. We utilize the insight that, in a multi-task setting, a failed attempt at one task might represent a successful attempt at another task. This allows us to leverage the robot's own trials as demonstrations for tasks other than the one that the robot actually attempted. Using an initial dataset of multi-task demonstration data, the robot autonomously collects trials which are only sparsely labeled with a binary indication of whether the trial accomplished any useful task or not. We then embed the trials into a learned latent space of tasks, trained using only the initial demonstration dataset, to draw similarities between various trials, enabling the robot to achieve one-shot generalization to new tasks. In contrast to prior imitation learning approaches, our method can autonomously collect data with sparse supervision for continuous improvement, and in contrast to reinforcement learning algorithms, our method can effectively improve from sparse, task-agnostic reward signals.

Includes members:
  Member "unsupervised visuomotor control through distributional planning networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "learning task driven control policies via information bottlenecks")
  Member "qt opt scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision based robotic manipulation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")
  Member "one shot high fidelity imitation training large scale deep nets with rl":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "making efficient use of demonstrations to solve hard exploration problems")
  Member "soft actor critic algorithms and applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "ready policy one world building through active learning")
  Member "neural task graphs generalizing to unseen tasks from a single video demonstration":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "learning to generalize across long horizon tasks from human demonstrations")
  Member "task embedded control networks for few shot imitation learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "goal conditioned end to end visuomotor control for versatile skill primitives")
  Member "one shot imitation from observing humans via domain adaptive meta learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "revisiting meta learning as supervised learning")
  Member "hindsight experience replay":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "review analyze and design a comprehensive deep reinforcement learning framework")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.RO(Robotics)