human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "how did the discussion go discourse act classification in social media conversations"):
  Abstract: Over the last two decades, social media has emerged as almost an alternate world where people communicate with each other and express opinions about almost anything. This makes platforms like Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, Myspace, etc., a rich bank of heterogeneous data, primarily expressed via text but reflecting all textual and non-textual data that human interaction can produce. We propose a novel attention-based hierarchical LSTM model to classify discourse act sequences in social media conversations, aimed at mining data from online discussion using textual meanings beyond sentence level. The very uniqueness of the task is the complete categorization of possible pragmatic roles in informal textual discussions, contrary to extraction of question–answers, stance detection, or sarcasm identification which are very much role specific tasks. Early attempt was made on a Reddit discussion dataset. We train our model on the same data, and present test results on two different datasets, one from Reddit and one from Facebook. Our proposed model outperformed the previous one in terms of domain independence; without using platform-dependent structural features, our hierarchical LSTM with word relevance attention mechanism achieved F1-scores of 71% and 66%, respectively, to predict discourse roles of comments in Reddit and Facebook discussions. Efficiency of recurrent and convolutional architectures in order to learn discursive representation on the same task has been presented and analyzed, with different word and comment embedding schemes. Our attention mechanism enables us to inquire into relevance ordering of text segments according to their roles in discourse. We present a human annotator experiment to unveil important observations about modeling and data annotation. Equipped with our text-based discourse identification model, we inquire into how heterogeneous non-textual features like location, time, leaning of information, etc. play their roles in characterizing online discussions on Facebook.

Includes members:
  Member "friends and enemies of clinton and trump using context for detecting stance in political tweets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "your stance is exposed analysing possible factors for stance detection on social media")
  Member "topic independent identification of agreement and disagreement in social media dialogue":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "estimating causal effects of tone in online debates")
  Member "metrics for community analysis a survey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "when less is more systematic analysis of cascade based community detection")
  Member "distributed representations of sentences and documents":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "sequence to sequence learning with neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "a convolutional neural network for modelling sentences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "recurrent convolutional neural networks for discourse compositionality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "local contextual attention with hierarchical structure for dialogue act recognition")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)