human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "dlime a deterministic local interpretable model agnostic explanations approach for computer aided diagnosis systems"):
  Abstract: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) is a popular technique used to increase the interpretability and explainability of black box Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. LIME typically generates an explanation for a single prediction by any ML model by learning a simpler interpretable model (e.g. linear classifier) around the prediction through generating simulated data around the instance by random perturbation, and obtaining feature importance through applying some form of feature selection. While LIME and similar local algorithms have gained popularity due to their simplicity, the random perturbation and feature selection methods result in "instability" in the generated explanations, where for the same prediction, different explanations can be generated. This is a critical issue that can prevent deployment of LIME in a Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system, where stability is of utmost importance to earn the trust of medical professionals. In this paper, we propose a deterministic version of LIME. Instead of random perturbation, we utilize agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (HC) to group the training data together and K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) to select the relevant cluster of the new instance that is being explained. After finding the relevant cluster, a linear model is trained over the selected cluster to generate the explanations. Experimental results on three different medical datasets show the superiority for Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (DLIME), where we quantitatively determine the stability of DLIME compared to LIME utilizing the Jaccard similarity among multiple generated explanations.

Includes members:
  Member "ibreakdown uncertainty of model explanations for non additive predictive models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "model agnostic supervised local explanations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "assessing the stability of interpretable models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ibreakdown uncertainty of model explanations for non additive predictive models")
  Member "axiomatic attribution for deep networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "adversarial attacks and defenses on graphs a review and empirical study")
  Member "a unified approach to interpreting model predictions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "right for the right reasons training differentiable models by constraining their explanations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "counterfactual samples synthesizing for robust visual question answering")
  Member "interpretable explanations of black boxes by meaningful perturbation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "self supervised discovering of causal features towards interpretable reinforcement learning")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)