human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "data encoding for byzantine resilient distributed optimization"):
  Abstract: We study distributed optimization in the presence of Byzantine adversaries, where both data and computation are distributed among $m$ worker machines, $t$ of which can be corrupt and collaboratively deviate arbitrarily from their pre-specified programs, and a designated (master) node iteratively computes the model/parameter vector for {\em generalized linear models}. In this work, we primarily focus on two iterative algorithms: {\em Proximal Gradient Descent} (PGD) and {\em Coordinate Descent} (CD). Gradient descent (GD) is a special case of these algorithms. PGD is typically used in the data-parallel setting, where data is partitioned across different samples, whereas, CD is used in the model-parallelism setting, where the data is partitioned across the parameter space. #R##N#In this paper, we propose a method based on data encoding and error correction over real numbers to combat adversarial attacks. We can tolerate up to $t\leq \lfloor\frac{m-1}{2}\rfloor$ corrupt worker nodes, which is information-theoretically optimal. We give deterministic guarantees, and our method does not assume any probability distribution on the data. We develop a {\em sparse} encoding scheme which enables computationally efficient data encoding and decoding. We demonstrate a trade-off between corruption threshold and the resource requirement (storage and computational/communication complexity). As an example, for $t\leq\frac{m}{3}$, our scheme incurs only a {\em constant} overhead on these resources, over that required by the plain distributed PGD/CD algorithms which provide no adversarial protection. #R##N#Our encoding scheme extends {\em efficiently} to (i) the data streaming model, where data samples come in an online fashion and are encoded as they arrive, and (ii) making {\em stochastic gradient descent} (SGD) Byzantine-resilient. In the end, we give experimental results to show the efficacy of our method.

Includes members:
  Member "speeding up distributed machine learning using codes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "gcsa codes with noise alignment for secure coded multi party batch matrix multiplication")
  Member "byzantine robust distributed learning towards optimal statistical rates":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "turbo aggregate breaking the quadratic aggregation barrier in secure federated learning")
  Member "short dot computing large linear transforms distributedly using coded short dot products":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "gcsa codes with noise alignment for secure coded multi party batch matrix multiplication")
  Member "distributed statistical machine learning in adversarial settings byzantine gradient descent":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "trends and advancements in deep neural network communication")
  Member "stochastic distributed and federated optimization for machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "distributed machine learning on mobile devices a survey")
  Member "an equivalence between the lasso and support vector machines":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "modified frank wolfe algorithm for enhanced sparsity in support vector machine classifiers")
  Member "making gradient descent optimal for strongly convex stochastic optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "wireless federated learning with local differential privacy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)