human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "towards the tradeoff between service performance and information freshness"):
  Abstract: The last decade has witnessed an unprecedented growth in the demand for data-driven real-time services. These services are fueled by emerging applications that require rapidly injecting data streams and computing updated analytics results in real-time. In many of such applications, the computing resources are often shared for processing both updates from information sources and queries from end users. This requires joint scheduling of updates and queries because the service provider needs to make a critical decision upon receiving a user query: either it responds immediately with currently available but possibly stale information, or it first processes new updates and then responds with fresher information. Hence, the tradeoff between service performance and information freshness naturally arises in this context. To that end, we propose a simple single-server two-queue model that captures the coupled scheduling of updates and queries and aim to design scheduling policies that can properly address the important tradeoff between performance and freshness. Specifically, we consider the response time as a performance metric and the Age of Information (AoI) as a freshness metric. After demonstrating the limitations of the simplest FCFS policy, we propose two threshold-based policies: the Query-k policy that prioritizes queries and the Update-k policy that prioritizes updates. Then, we rigorously analyze both the response time and the Peak AoI (PAoI) of the threshold-based policies. Further, we propose the Joint-(M,N) policy, which allows flexibly prioritizing updates or queries through choosing different values of two thresholds M and N. Finally, we conduct simulations to evaluate the response time and the PAoI of the proposed policies. The results show that our proposed threshold-based policies can effectively control the balance between performance and freshness.

Includes members:
  Member "scheduling policies for minimizing age of information in broadcast wireless networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "who should google scholar update more often")
  Member "the power of waiting for more than one response in minimizing the age of information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "waiting but not aging age of information and utility optimization under the pull model")
  Member "update or wait how to keep your data fresh":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "who should google scholar update more often")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.PF(Performance)