human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "rotate textit king to get textit queen word relationships as orthogonal transformations in embedding space"):
  Abstract: A notable property of word embeddings is that word relationships can exist as linear substructures in the embedding space. For example, $\textit{gender}$ corresponds to $\vec{\textit{woman}} - \vec{\textit{man}}$ and $\vec{\textit{queen}} - \vec{\textit{king}}$. This, in turn, allows word analogies to be solved arithmetically: $\vec{\textit{king}} - \vec{\textit{man}} + \vec{\textit{woman}} \approx \vec{\textit{queen}}$. This property is notable because it suggests that models trained on word embeddings can easily learn such relationships as geometric translations. However, there is no evidence that models $\textit{exclusively}$ represent relationships in this manner. We document an alternative way in which downstream models might learn these relationships: orthogonal and linear transformations. For example, given a translation vector for $\textit{gender}$, we can find an orthogonal matrix $R$, representing a rotation and reflection, such that $R(\vec{\textit{king}}) \approx \vec{\textit{queen}}$ and $R(\vec{\textit{man}}) \approx \vec{\textit{woman}}$. Analogical reasoning using orthogonal transformations is almost as accurate as using vector arithmetic; using linear transformations is more accurate than both. Our findings suggest that these transformations can be as good a representation of word relationships as translation vectors.

Includes members:
  Member "analyzing multi head self attention specialized heads do the heavy lifting the rest can be pruned":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "gender bias in contextualized word embeddings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "lipstick on a pig debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "what does bert look at an analysis of bert s attention":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "bert can see out of the box on the cross modal transferability of text representations")
  Member "understanding undesirable word embedding associations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "automatically neutralizing subjective bias in text")
  Member "beyond word importance contextual decomposition to extract interactions from lstms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "understanding image captioning models beyond visualizing attention")
  Member "attention is all you need":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "enriching word vectors with subword information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)