human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "probing natural language inference models through semantic fragments"):
  Abstract: Do state-of-the-art models for language understanding already have, or can they easily learn, abilities such as boolean coordination, quantification, conditionals, comparatives, and monotonicity reasoning (i.e., reasoning about word substitutions in sentential contexts)? While such phenomena are involved in natural language inference (NLI) and go beyond basic linguistic understanding, it is unclear the extent to which they are captured in existing NLI benchmarks and effectively learned by models. To investigate this, we propose the use of semantic fragments---systematically generated datasets that each target a different semantic phenomenon---for probing, and efficiently improving, such capabilities of linguistic models. This approach to creating challenge datasets allows direct control over the semantic diversity and complexity of the targeted linguistic phenomena, and results in a more precise characterization of a model's linguistic behavior. Our experiments, using a library of 8 such semantic fragments, reveal two remarkable findings: (a) State-of-the-art models, including BERT, that are pre-trained on existing NLI benchmark datasets perform poorly on these new fragments, even though the phenomena probed here are central to the NLI task. (b) On the other hand, with only a few minutes of additional fine-tuning---with a carefully selected learning rate and a novel variation of "inoculation"---a BERT-based model can master all of these logic and monotonicity fragments while retaining its performance on established NLI benchmarks.

Includes members:
  Member "can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "right for the wrong reasons diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial filters of dataset biases")
  Member "monalog a lightweight system for natural language inference based on monotonicity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "assessing bert s syntactic abilities":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "are pre trained language models aware of phrases simple but strong baselines for grammar induction")
  Member "inoculation by fine tuning a method for analyzing challenge datasets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "adversarial filters of dataset biases")
  Member "correlating neural and symbolic representations of language":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "discovering the compositional structure of vector representations with role learning networks")
  Member "a logical based corpus for cross lingual evaluation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "posing fair generalization tasks for natural language inference":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "what does my qa model know devising controlled probes using expert knowledge")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)