human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deeprace finding data race bugs via deep learning"):
  Abstract: With the proliferation of multi-core hardware, parallel programs have become ubiquitous. These programs have their own type of bugs known as concurrency bugs and among them, data race bugs have been mostly in the focus of researchers over the past decades. In fact, detecting data races is a very challenging and important task. There have been several research paths in this area with many sophisticated tools designed and utilized that focus on detecting data race at the file level. In this paper, we propose DeepRace, a novel approach toward detecting data races in the source code. We build a deep neural network model to find data races instead of creating a data race detector manually. Our model uses a one-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) with different window size to find data races method. Then we adopt the class activation map function with global average pooling to extract the weights of the last convolutional layer and backpropagate it with the input source code to extract the line of codes with a data race. Thus, the DeepRace model can detect the data race bugs on a file and line of code level. In addition, we noticed that DeepRace successfully detects several buggy lines of code at different locations of the file. We tested the model with OpenMP and POSIX source code datasets which consist of more than 5000 and 8000 source code files respectively. We were able to successfully classify buggy source code files and achieve accuracies ranging from 81% and 86%. We also measured the performance of detecting and visualizing the data race at the line of code levels and our model achieved promising results. We only had a small number of false positives and false, ranging from 1 to 10. Furthermore, we used the intersection of union to measure the accuracy of the buggy lines of code, our model achieved promising results of 66 percent.

Includes members:
  Member "conpredictor concurrency defect prediction in real world applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "learning deep features for discriminative localization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "ha ccn hierarchical attention based crowd counting network")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)