human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "read beyond the lines understanding the implied textual meaning via a skim and intensive reading model"):
  Abstract: The nonliteral interpretation of a text is hard to be understood by machine models due to its high context-sensitivity and heavy usage of figurative language. In this study, inspired by human reading comprehension, we propose a novel, simple, and effective deep neural framework, called Skim and Intensive Reading Model (SIRM), for figuring out implied textual meaning. The proposed SIRM consists of two main components, namely the skim reading component and intensive reading component. N-gram features are quickly extracted from the skim reading component, which is a combination of several convolutional neural networks, as skim (entire) information. An intensive reading component enables a hierarchical investigation for both local (sentence) and global (paragraph) representation, which encapsulates the current embedding and the contextual information with a dense connection. More specifically, the contextual information includes the near-neighbor information and the skim information mentioned above. Finally, besides the normal training loss function, we employ an adversarial loss function as a penalty over the skim reading component to eliminate noisy information arisen from special figurative words in the training data. To verify the effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency of the proposed architecture, we conduct extensive comparative experiments on several sarcasm benchmarks and an industrial spam dataset with metaphors. Experimental results indicate that (1) the proposed model, which benefits from context modeling and consideration of figurative language, outperforms existing state-of-the-art solutions, with comparable parameter scale and training speed; (2) the SIRM yields superior robustness in terms of parameter size sensitivity; (3) compared with ablation and addition variants of the SIRM, the final framework is efficient enough.

Includes members:
  Member "detect camouflaged spam content via stoneskipping graph and text joint embedding for chinese character variation representation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "ordered neurons integrating tree structures into recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "are pre trained language models aware of phrases simple but strong baselines for grammar induction")
  Member "baseline needs more love on simple word embedding based models and associated pooling mechanisms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "meta embeddings based on self attention")
  Member "what you can cram into a single vector probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "sbert wk a sentence embedding method by dissecting bert based word models")
  Member "simple recurrent units for highly parallelizable recurrence":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "refined gate a simple and effective gating mechanism for recurrent units")
  Member "attention is all you need":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "a large self annotated corpus for sarcasm":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "xslue a benchmark and analysis platform for cross style language understanding and evaluation")
  Member "convolutional sequence to sequence learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a brief survey of multilingual neural machine translation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)