human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "freeze and chaos for dnns an ntk view of batch normalization checkerboard and boundary effects"):
  Abstract: In this paper, we analyze a number of architectural features of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), using the so-called Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK). The NTK describes the training trajectory and generalization of DNNs in the infinite-width limit. #R##N#In this limit, we show that for (fully-connected) DNNs, as the depth grows, two regimes appear: "freeze" (also known as "order"), where the (scaled) NTK converges to a constant (slowing convergence), and "chaos", where it converges to a Kronecker delta (limiting generalization). #R##N#We show that when using the scaled ReLU as a nonlinearity, we naturally end up in the "freeze". We show that Batch Normalization (BN) avoids the freeze regime by reducing the importance of the constant mode in the NTK. A similar effect is obtained by normalizing the nonlinearity which moves the network to the chaotic regime. #R##N#We uncover the same "freeze" and "chaos" modes in Deep Deconvolutional Networks (DC-NNs). The "freeze" regime is characterized by checkerboard patterns in the image space in addition to the constant modes in input space. Finally, we introduce a new NTK-based parametrization to eliminate border artifacts and we propose a layer-dependent learning rate to improve the convergence of DC-NNs. #R##N#We illustrate our findings by training DCGANs using our setup. When trained in the "freeze" regime, we see that the generator collapses to a checkerboard mode. We also demonstrate numerically that the generator collapse can be avoided and that good quality samples can be obtained, by tuning the nonlinearity to reach the "chaos" regime (without using batch normalization).

Includes members:
  Member "scaling limits of wide neural networks with weight sharing gaussian process behavior gradient independence and neural tangent kernel derivation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "a mean field theory of batch normalization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "batch normalization biases deep residual networks towards shallow paths")
  Member "on exact computation with an infinitely wide neural net":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "large scale gan training for high fidelity natural image synthesis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "a style based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "a convergence theory for deep learning via over parameterization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "gradient descent provably optimizes over parameterized neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "toward deeper understanding of neural networks the power of initialization and a dual view on expressivity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)