human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "entropy regularization with discounted future state distribution in policy gradient methods"):
  Abstract: The policy gradient theorem is defined based on an objective with respect to the initial distribution over states. In the discounted case, this results in policies that are optimal for one distribution over initial states, but may not be uniformly optimal for others, no matter where the agent starts from. Furthermore, to obtain unbiased gradient estimates, the starting point of the policy gradient estimator requires sampling states from a normalized discounted weighting of states. However, the difficulty of estimating the normalized discounted weighting of states, or the stationary state distribution, is quite well-known. Additionally, the large sample complexity of policy gradient methods is often attributed to insufficient exploration, and to remedy this, it is often assumed that the restart distribution provides sufficient exploration in these algorithms. In this work, we propose exploration in policy gradient methods based on maximizing entropy of the discounted future state distribution. The key contribution of our work includes providing a practically feasible algorithm to estimate the normalized discounted weighting of states, i.e, the \textit{discounted future state distribution}. We propose that exploration can be achieved by entropy regularization with the discounted state distribution in policy gradients, where a metric for maximal coverage of the state space can be based on the entropy of the induced state distribution. The proposed approach can be considered as a three time-scale algorithm and under some mild technical conditions, we prove its convergence to a locally optimal policy. Experimentally, we demonstrate usefulness of regularization with the discounted future state distribution in terms of increased state space coverage and faster learning on a range of complex tasks.

Includes members:
  Member "information asymmetry in kl regularized rl":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "periodic intra ensemble knowledge distillation for reinforcement learning")
  Member "the value function polytope in reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "policy evaluation networks")
  Member "provably efficient maximum entropy exploration":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "explore discover and learn unsupervised discovery of state covering skills")
  Member "an off policy policy gradient theorem using emphatic weightings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "provably convergent two timescale off policy actor critic with function approximation")
  Member "addressing function approximation error in actor critic methods":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "self supervised discovering of causal features towards interpretable reinforcement learning")
  Member "diversity is all you need learning skills without a reward function":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "meta learning curiosity algorithms")
  Member "soft actor critic off policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "learning to walk in the real world with minimal human effort")
  Member "vfunc a deep generative model for functions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "marginalized state distribution entropy regularization in policy optimization")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)