human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "lesion harvester iteratively mining unlabeled lesions and hard negative examples at scale"):
  Abstract: Acquiring large-scale medical image data, necessary for training machine learning algorithms, is frequently intractable, due to prohibitive expert-driven annotation costs. Recent datasets extracted from hospital archives, e.g., DeepLesion, have begun to address this problem. However, these are often incompletely or noisily labeled, e.g., DeepLesion leaves over 50% of its lesions unlabeled. Thus, effective methods to harvest missing annotations are critical for continued progress in medical image analysis. This is the goal of our work, where we develop a powerful system to harvest missing lesions from the DeepLesion dataset at high precision. Accepting the need for some degree of expert labor to achieve high fidelity, we exploit a small fully-labeled subset of medical image volumes and use it to intelligently mine annotations from the remainder. To do this, we chain together a highly sensitive lesion proposal generator and a very selective lesion proposal classifier. While our framework is generic, we optimize our performance by proposing a 3D contextual lesion proposal generator and by using a multi-view multi-scale lesion proposal classifier. These produce harvested and hard-negative proposals, which we then re-use to finetune our proposal generator by using a novel hard negative suppression loss, continuing this process until no extra lesions are found. Extensive experimental analysis demonstrates that our method can harvest an additional 9,805 lesions while keeping precision above 90%. To demonstrate the benefits of our approach, we show that lesion detectors trained on our harvested lesions can significantly outperform the same variants only trained on the original annotations, with boost of average precision of 7% to 10%. We open source our annotations at this https URL.

Includes members:
  Member "attentive ct lesion detection using deep pyramid inference with multi scale booster":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "uldor a universal lesion detector for ct scans with pseudo masks and hard negative example mining":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "weakly supervised lesion segmentation on ct scans using co segmentation")
  Member "mulan multitask universal lesion analysis network for joint lesion detection tagging and segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "weakly supervised lesion segmentation on ct scans using co segmentation")
  Member "objects as points":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "category wise attack transferable adversarial examples for anchor free object detection")
  Member "accurate weakly supervised deep lesion segmentation using large scale clinical annotations slice propagated 3d mask generation from 2d recist":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "weakly supervised lesion segmentation on ct scans using co segmentation")
  Member "soft sampling for robust object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "object detection as a positive unlabeled problem")
  Member "unsupervised joint mining of deep features and image labels for large scale radiology image categorization and scene recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "collaborative learning of semi supervised clustering and classification for labeling uncurated data")
  Member "focal loss for dense object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)