human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "neural collision clearance estimator for fast robot motion planning"):
  Abstract: Collision checking is a well known bottleneck in sampling-based motion planning due to its computational expense and the large number of checks required. To alleviate this bottleneck, we present a fast neural network collision checking heuristic, ClearanceNet, and incorporate it within a planning algorithm, ClearanceNet-RRT (CN-RRT). ClearanceNet takes as input a robot pose and the location of all obstacles in the workspace and learns to predict the clearance, i.e., distance to nearest obstacle. CN-RRT then efficiently computes a motion plan by leveraging three key features of ClearanceNet. First, as neural network inference is massively parallel, CN-RRT explores the space via a parallel RRT, which expands nodes in parallel, allowing for thousands of collision checks at once. Second, CN-RRT adaptively relaxes its clearance threshold for more difficult problems. Third, to repair errors, CN-RRT shifts states towards higher clearance through a gradient-based approach that uses the analytic gradient of ClearanceNet. Once a path is found, any errors are repaired via RRT over the misclassified sections, thus maintaining the theoretical guarantees of sampling-based motion planning. We evaluate the collision checking speed, planning speed, and motion plan efficiency in configuration spaces with up to 30 degrees of freedom. The collision checking achieves speedups of more than two orders of magnitude over traditional collision detection methods. Sampling-based planning over multiple robotic arms in new environment configurations achieves speedups of up to 51% over a baseline, with paths up to 25% more efficient. Experiments on a physical Fetch robot reaching into shelves in a cluttered environment confirm the feasibility of this method on real robots.

Includes members:
  Member "learning based proxy collision detection for robot motion planning applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "autonomous navigation in unknown environments using sparse kernel based occupancy mapping")
  Member "estimating configuration space belief from collision checks for motion planning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "robot motion planning in learned latent spaces":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "probably approximately correct vision based planning using motion primitives")
  Member "fastron an online learning based model and active learning strategy for proxy collision detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "autonomous navigation in unknown environments using sparse kernel based occupancy mapping")
  Member "learning sampling distributions for robot motion planning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "accelerating cooperative planning for automated vehicles with learned heuristics and monte carlo tree search")
  Member "data driven planning via imitation learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "bayesian residual policy optimization scalable bayesian reinforcement learning with clairvoyant experts")
  Member "adam a method for stochastic optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "information theoretic regret bounds for gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "efficient and robust algorithms for adversarial linear contextual bandits")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.RO(Robotics)