human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "linguistic knowledge and transferability of contextual representations"):
  Abstract: Contextual word representations derived from large-scale neural language models are successful across a diverse set of NLP tasks, suggesting that they encode useful and transferable features of language. To shed light on the linguistic knowledge they capture, we study the representations produced by several recent pretrained contextualizers (variants of ELMo, the OpenAI transformer language model, and BERT) with a suite of seventeen diverse probing tasks. We find that linear models trained on top of frozen contextual representations are competitive with state-of-the-art task-specific models in many cases, but fail on tasks requiring fine-grained linguistic knowledge (e.g., conjunct identification). To investigate the transferability of contextual word representations, we quantify differences in the transferability of individual layers within contextualizers, especially between recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and transformers. For instance, higher layers of RNNs are more task-specific, while transformer layers do not exhibit the same monotonic trend. In addition, to better understand what makes contextual word representations transferable, we compare language model pretraining with eleven supervised pretraining tasks. For any given task, pretraining on a closely related task yields better performance than language model pretraining (which is better on average) when the pretraining dataset is fixed. However, language model pretraining on more data gives the best results.

Includes members:
  Member "to tune or not to tune adapting pretrained representations to diverse tasks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "contextual lensing of universal sentence representations")
  Member "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "cross lingual alignment of contextual word embeddings with applications to zero shot dependency parsing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "xpersona evaluating multilingual personalized chatbot")
  Member "what can linguistics and deep learning contribute to each other":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "do rnns learn human like abstract word order preferences")
  Member "what do rnn language models learn about filler gap dependencies":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networks")
  Member "what s going on in neural constituency parsers an analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "head driven phrase structure grammar parsing on penn treebank")
  Member "language modeling teaches you more syntax than translation does lessons learned through auxiliary task analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "on the linguistic representational power of neural machine translation models")
  Member "why self attention a targeted evaluation of neural machine translation architectures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "meta embeddings based on self attention")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)