human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "cloud based image classification service is not robust to adversarial examples a forgotten battlefield"):
  Abstract: In recent years, Deep Learning(DL) techniques have been extensively deployed for computer vision tasks, particularly visual classification problems, where new algorithms reported to achieve or even surpass the human performance . While many recent works demonstrated that DL models are vulnerable to adversarial examples.Fortunately, generating adversarial examples usually requires white-box access to the victim model, and real-world cloud-based image classification services are more complex than white-box classifier,the architecture and parameters of DL models on cloud platforms cannot be obtained by the attacker. The attacker can only access the APIs opened by cloud platforms. Thus, keeping models in the cloud can usually give a (false) sense of this http URL this paper, we mainly focus on studying the security of real-world cloud-based image classification services. Specifically, (1) We propose two novel attack methods, Image Fusion(IF) attack and Fast Featuremap Loss PGD (FFL-PGD) attack based on Substitution model ,which achieve a high bypass rate with a very limited number of queries. Instead of millions of queries in previous studies, our methods find the adversarial examples using only two queries per image ; and (2) we make the first attempt to conduct an extensive empirical study of black-box attacks against real-world cloud-based classification services. Through evaluations on four popular cloud platforms including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Clarifai, we demonstrate that Spatial Transformation (ST) attack has a success rate of approximately 100\% except Amazon approximately 50\%, IF and FFL-PGD attack have a success rate over 90\% among different classification services. (3) We discuss the possible defenses to address these security challenges in cloud-based classification services.Our defense technology is mainly divided into model training stage and image preprocessing stage.

Includes members:
  Member "adversarial examples versus cloud based detectors a black box empirical study":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "advbox a toolbox to generate adversarial examples that fool neural networks")
  Member "an analysis of deep neural network models for practical applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "crl class representative learning for image classification")
  Member "google s cloud vision api is not robust to noise":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "advbox a toolbox to generate adversarial examples that fool neural networks")
  Member "query efficient black box adversarial examples superceded":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "transferability of adversarial examples to attack cloud based image classifier service")
  Member "mitigating adversarial effects through randomization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "universal adversarial attack on attention and the resulting dataset damagenet")
  Member "practical black box attacks against machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "ssd single shot multibox detector":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "delving into transferable adversarial examples and black box attacks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)