human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "can i trust the explainer verifying post hoc explanatory methods"):
  Abstract: For AI systems to garner widespread public acceptance, we must develop methods capable of explaining the decisions of black-box models such as neural networks. In this work, we identify two issues of current explanatory methods. First, we show that two prevalent perspectives on explanations --- feature-additivity and feature-selection --- lead to fundamentally different instance-wise explanations. In the literature, explainers from different perspectives are currently being directly compared, despite their distinct explanation goals. The second issue is that current post-hoc explainers are either validated under simplistic scenarios (on simple models such as linear regression, or on models trained on syntactic datasets), or, when applied to real-world neural networks, explainers are commonly validated under the assumption that the learned models behave reasonably. However, neural networks often rely on unreasonable correlations, even when producing correct decisions. We introduce a verification framework for explanatory methods under the feature-selection perspective. Our framework is based on a non-trivial neural network architecture trained on a real-world task, and for which we are able to provide guarantees on its inner workings. We validate the efficacy of our evaluation by showing the failure modes of current explainers. We aim for this framework to provide a publicly available, off-the-shelf evaluation when the feature-selection perspective on explanations is needed.

Includes members:
  Member "multimodal explanations justifying decisions and pointing to the evidence":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "robust explanations for visual question answering")
  Member "annotation artifacts in natural language inference data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "adversarial filters of dataset biases")
  Member "evaluating neural network explanation methods using hybrid documents and morphological prediction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on attribution of recurrent neural network predictions via additive decomposition")
  Member "breaking nli systems with sentences that require simple lexical inferences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "stance detection benchmark how robust is your stance detection")
  Member "model agnostic supervised local explanations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "what made you do this understanding black box decisions with sufficient input subsets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "overinterpretation reveals image classification model pathologies")
  Member "textual explanations for self driving vehicles":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "explaining with counter visual attributes and examples")
  Member "e snli natural language inference with natural language explanations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "learning from explanations with neural execution tree")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)