human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "why not give this work to them explaining ai moderated task allocation outcomes using negotiation trees"):
  Abstract: The problem of multi-agent task allocation arises in a variety of scenarios involving human teams. In many such settings, human teammates may act with selfish motives and try to minimize their cost metrics. In the absence of (1) complete knowledge about the reward of other agents and (2) the team's overall cost associated with a particular allocation outcome, distributed algorithms can only arrive at sub-optimal solutions within a reasonable amount of time. To address these challenges, we introduce the notion of an AI Task Allocator (AITA) that, with complete knowledge, comes up with fair allocations that strike a balance between the individual human costs and the team's performance cost. To ensure that AITA is explicable to the humans, we allow each human agent to question AITA's proposed allocation with counterfactual allocations. In response, we design AITA to provide a replay negotiation tree that acts as an explanation showing why the counterfactual allocation, with the correct costs, will eventually result in a sub-optimal allocation. This explanation also updates a human's incomplete knowledge about their teammate's and the team's actual costs. We then investigate whether humans are (1) able to understand the explanations provided and (2) convinced by it using human factor studies. Finally, we show the effect of various kinds of incompleteness on the length of explanations. We conclude that underestimation of other's costs often leads to the need for explanations and in turn, longer explanations on average.

Includes members:
  Member "negotiation strategies for agents with ordinal preferences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "competitive equilibrium for almost all incomes existence and fairness")
  Member "towards providing explanations for ai planner decisions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards explainable ai planning as a service")
  Member "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "plan explanations as model reconciliation moving beyond explanation as soliloquy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the emerging landscape of explainable ai planning and decision making")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "negotiating socially optimal allocations of resources":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "multi cycle assignment problems with rotational diversity")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)