human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "compact error resilient self assembly of recursively defined patterns"):
  Abstract: A limitation to molecular implementations of tile-based self-assembly systems is the high rate of mismatch errors which has been observed to be between 1% and 10%. Controlling the physical conditions of the system to reduce this intrinsic error rate $\epsilon$ prohibitively slows the growth rate of the system. This has motivated the development of techniques to redundantly encode information in the tiles of a system in such a way that the rate of mismatch errors in the final assembly is reduced even without a reduction in $\epsilon$. Winfree and Bekbolatov, and Chen and Goel, introduced such error-resilient systems that reduce the mismatch error rate to $\epsilon^k$ by replacing each tile in an error-prone system with a $k \times k$ block of tiles in the error-resilient system, but this increases the number of tile types used by a factor of $k^2$, and the scale of the pattern produced by a factor of $k$. Reif, Sahu and Yin, and Sahu and Reif, introduced compact error-resilient systems for the self-assembly of Boolean arrays that reduce the mismatch error rate to $\epsilon^2$ without increasing the scale of the pattern produced. In this paper, we give a technique to design compact error-resilient systems for the self-assembly of the recursively defined patterns introduced by Kautz and Lathrop. We show that our compact error-resilient systems reduce the mismatch error rate to $\epsilon^2$ by using the independent error model introduced by Sahu and Reif. Surprisingly, our error-resilient systems use the same number of tile types as the error-prone system from which they are constructed.

Includes members:
  Member "self assembly of the discrete sierpinski carpet and related fractals":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hierarchical growth is necessary and sometimes sufficient to self assemble discrete self similar fractals")
  Member "complexity of self assembled shapes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the program size complexity of self assembled paths")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)