human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "characterizing and avoiding problematic global optima of variational autoencoders"):
  Abstract: Variational Auto-encoders (VAEs) are deep generative latent variable models consisting of two components: a generative model that captures a data distribution p(x) by transforming a distribution p(z) over latent space, and an inference model that infers likely latent codes for each data point (Kingma and Welling, 2013). Recent work shows that traditional training methods tend to yield solutions that violate modeling desiderata: (1) the learned generative model captures the observed data distribution but does so while ignoring the latent codes, resulting in codes that do not represent the data (e.g. van den Oord et al. (2017); Kim et al. (2018)); (2) the aggregate of the learned latent codes does not match the prior p(z). This mismatch means that the learned generative model will be unable to generate realistic data with samples from p(z)(e.g. Makhzani et al. (2015); Tomczak and Welling (2017)). In this paper, we demonstrate that both issues stem from the fact that the global optima of the VAE training objective often correspond to undesirable solutions. Our analysis builds on two observations: (1) the generative model is unidentifiable - there exist many generative models that explain the data equally well, each with different (and potentially unwanted) properties and (2) bias in the VAE objective - the VAE objective may prefer generative models that explain the data poorly but have posteriors that are easy to approximate. We present a novel inference method, LiBI, mitigating the problems identified in our analysis. On synthetic datasets, we show that LiBI can learn generative models that capture the data distribution and inference models that better satisfy modeling assumptions when traditional methods struggle to do so.

Includes members:
  Member "lagging inference networks and posterior collapse in variational autoencoders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "dlow diversifying latent flows for diverse human motion prediction")
  Member "preventing posterior collapse with delta vaes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "latent normalizing flows for many to many cross domain mappings")
  Member "constrained graph variational autoencoders for molecule design":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "hierarchical generation of molecular graphs using structural motifs")
  Member "infovae information maximizing variational autoencoders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "nestedvae isolating common factors via weak supervision")
  Member "improved variational autoencoders for text modeling using dilated convolutions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "blank language models")
  Member "towards deeper understanding of variational autoencoding models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "hierarchical quantized autoencoders")
  Member "vae with a vampprior":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "nestedvae isolating common factors via weak supervision")
  Member "neural discrete representation learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "learning representations by predicting bags of visual words")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)