human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deep neural review text interaction for recommendation systems"):
  Abstract: Users' reviews contain valuable information which are not taken into account in most recommender systems. According to the latest studies in this field, using review texts could not only improve the performance of recommendation, but it can also alleviate the impact of data sparsity and help to tackle the cold start problem. In this paper, we present a neural recommender model which recommends items by leveraging user reviews. In order to predict user rating for each item, our proposed model, named MatchPyramid Recommender System (MPRS), represents each user and item with their corresponding review texts. Thus, the problem of recommendation is viewed as a text matching problem such that the matching score obtained from matching user and item texts could be considered as a good representative of their joint extent of similarity. To solve the text matching problem, inspired by MatchPyramid (Pang, 2016), we employed an interaction-based approach according to which a matching matrix is constructed given a pair of input texts. The matching matrix, which has the property of hierarchical matching patterns, is then fed into a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to compute the matching score for the given user-item pair. Our experiments on the small data categories of Amazon review dataset show that our proposed model gains from 1.76% to 21.72% relative improvement compared to DeepCoNN model, and from 0.83% to 3.15% relative improvement compared to TransNets model. Also, on two large categories, namely AZ-CSJ and AZ-Mov, our model achieves relative improvements of 8.08% and 7.56% compared to the DeepCoNN model, and relative improvements of 1.74% and 0.86% compared to the TransNets model, respectively.

Includes members:
  Member "neural rating regression with abstractive tips generation for recommendation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "developing multi task recommendations with long term rewards via policy distilled reinforcement learning")
  Member "joint deep modeling of users and items using reviews for recommendation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "transnets learning to transform for recommendation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "text matching as image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "selective weak supervision for neural information retrieval")
  Member "inferring networks of substitutable and complementary products":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "cube2net efficient query specific network construction with data cube organization")
  Member "image based recommendations on styles and substitutes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "learning distributed representations from reviews for collaborative filtering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "ai powered text generation for harmonious human machine interaction current state and future directions")
  Member "collaborative deep learning for recommender systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)