human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "policy gradients for contextual recommendations"):
  Abstract: Decision making is a challenging task in online recommender systems. The decision maker often needs to choose a contextual item at each step from a set of candidates. Contextual bandit algorithms have been successfully deployed to such applications, for the trade-off between exploration and exploitation and the state-of-art performance on minimizing online costs. However, the applicability of existing contextual bandit methods is limited by the over-simplified assumptions of the problem, such as assuming a simple form of the reward function or assuming a static environment where the states are not affected by previous actions.    In this work, we put forward Policy Gradients for Contextual Recommendations (PGCR) to solve the problem without those unrealistic assumptions. It optimizes over a restricted class of policies where the marginal probability of choosing an item (in expectation of other items) has a simple closed form, and the gradient of the expected return over the policy in this class is in a succinct form. Moreover, PGCR leverages two useful heuristic techniques called Time-Dependent Greed and Actor-Dropout. The former ensures PGCR to be empirically greedy in the limit, and the latter addresses the trade-off between exploration and exploitation by using the policy network with Dropout as a Bayesian approximation.    PGCR can solve the standard contextual bandits as well as its Markov Decision Process generalization. Therefore it can be applied to a wide range of realistic settings of recommendations, such as personalized advertising. We evaluate PGCR on toy datasets as well as a real-world dataset of personalized music recommendations. Experiments show that PGCR enables fast convergence and low regret, and outperforms both classic contextual-bandits and vanilla policy gradient methods.

Includes members:
  Member "reinforcement mechanism design for e commerce":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "deep reinforcement learning for search recommendation and online advertising a survey by xiangyu zhao long xia jiliang tang and dawei yin with martin vesely as coordinator")
  Member "seqgan sequence generative adversarial nets with policy gradient":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")
  Member "continuous control with deep reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving a survey")
  Member "memory based control with recurrent neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "dynamic energy dispatch in isolated microgrids based on deep reinforcement learning")
  Member "adam a method for stochastic optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "off policy actor critic":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "improving coordination in small scale multi agent deep reinforcement learning through memory driven communication")
  Member "thompson sampling for contextual bandits with linear payoffs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "neural contextual bandits with ucb based exploration")
  Member "information theoretic regret bounds for gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "efficient and robust algorithms for adversarial linear contextual bandits")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)