human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "linspector multilingual probing tasks for word representations"):
  Abstract: Despite an ever growing number of word representation models introduced for a large number of languages, there is a lack of a standardized technique to provide insights into what is captured by these models. Such insights would help the community to get an estimate of the downstream task performance, as well as to design more informed neural architectures, while avoiding extensive experimentation which requires substantial computational resources not all researchers have access to. A recent development in NLP is to use simple classification tasks, also called probing tasks, that test for a single linguistic feature such as part-of-speech. Existing studies mostly focus on exploring the linguistic information encoded by the continuous representations of English text. However, from a typological perspective the morphologically poor English is rather an outlier: the information encoded by the word order and function words in English is often stored on a morphological level in other languages. To address this, we introduce 15 type-level probing tasks such as case marking, possession, word length, morphological tag count and pseudoword identification for 24 languages. We present a reusable methodology for creation and evaluation of such tests in a multilingual setting. We then present experiments on several diverse multilingual word embedding models, in which we relate the probing task performance for a diverse set of languages to a range of five classic NLP tasks: POS-tagging, dependency parsing, semantic role labeling, named entity recognition and natural language inference. We find that a number of probing tests have significantly high positive correlation to the downstream tasks, especially for morphologically rich languages. We show that our tests can be used to explore word embeddings or black-box neural models for linguistic cues in a multilingual setting.

Includes members:
  Member "linspector web a multilingual probing suite for word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "a survey of cross lingual word embedding models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "multilingual alignment of contextual word representations")
  Member "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "towards better ud parsing deep contextualized word embeddings ensemble and treebank concatenation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "parsing as pretraining")
  Member "xnli evaluating cross lingual sentence representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "on the complexity and typology of inflectional morphological systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "morphological irregularity correlates with frequency")
  Member "allennlp a deep semantic natural language processing platform":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "beat the ai investigating adversarial human annotations for reading comprehension")
  Member "unimorph 2 0 universal morphology":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "few shot and zero shot learning for historical text normalization")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)