human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "standardized assessment of automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensities and results of the wmh segmentation challenge"):
  Abstract: Quantification of cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMH) of presumed vascular origin is of key importance in many neurological research studies. Currently, measurements are often still obtained from manual segmentations on brain MR images, which is a laborious procedure. The automatic WMH segmentation methods exist, but a standardized comparison of the performance of such methods is lacking. We organized a scientific challenge, in which developers could evaluate their methods on a standardized multi-center/-scanner image dataset, giving an objective comparison: the WMH Segmentation Challenge. Sixty T1 + FLAIR images from three MR scanners were released with the manual WMH segmentations for training. A test set of 110 images from five MR scanners was used for evaluation. The segmentation methods had to be containerized and submitted to the challenge organizers. Five evaluation metrics were used to rank the methods: 1) Dice similarity coefficient; 2) modified Hausdorff distance (95th percentile); 3) absolute log-transformed volume difference; 4) sensitivity for detecting individual lesions; and 5) F1-score for individual lesions. In addition, the methods were ranked on their inter-scanner robustness; 20 participants submitted their methods for evaluation. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the results. In brief, there is a cluster of four methods that rank significantly better than the other methods, with one clear winner. The inter-scanner robustness ranking shows that not all the methods generalize to unseen scanners. The challenge remains open for future submissions and provides a public platform for method evaluation.

Includes members:
  Member "do cifar 10 classifiers generalize to cifar 10":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")
  Member "fully convolutional network ensembles for white matter hyperintensities segmentation in mr images":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "e uda efficient unsupervised domain adaptation for cross site medical image segmentation")
  Member "on the compactness efficiency and representation of 3d convolutional networks brain parcellation as a pretext task":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "mri super resolution with gan and 3d multi level densenet smaller faster and better")
  Member "improving automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation with a cascaded 3d convolutional neural network approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "unpaired multi modal segmentation via knowledge distillation")
  Member "a survey on deep learning in medical image analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "medgan medical image translation using gans")
  Member "efficient multi scale 3d cnn with fully connected crf for accurate brain lesion segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "medgan medical image translation using gans")
  Member "rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")
  Member "deep retinal image understanding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "ophthalmic diagnosis using deep learning with fundus images a critical review")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)