human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "strip a defence against trojan attacks on deep neural networks"):
  Abstract: Recent trojan attacks on deep neural network (DNN) models are one insidious variant of data poisoning attacks. Trojan attacks exploit an effective backdoor created in a DNN model by leveraging the difficulty in interpretability of the learned model to misclassify any inputs signed with the attacker's chosen trojan trigger input. Trojan attacks are easy to craft; survive even in adverse conditions such as different viewpoints, and lighting conditions on images; and threaten real world applications such as autonomous vehicles and robotics. The trojan trigger is a secret guarded and exploited by the attacker. Therefore, detecting such trojaned inputs is a challenge, especially at run-time when models are in active operation. #R##N#We focus on vision systems and build the STRong Intentional Perturbation (STRIP) based run-time trojan attack detection system. We intentionally perturb the incoming input, for instance by superimposing various image patterns, and observe the randomness of the predicted classes for the perturbed inputs for a given model---malicious or benign---under deployment. A low entropy in the predicted classes violates the input-dependence property of a benign model and implies the presence of a malicious input---a characteristic of a trojaned input. The high efficacy of our method is validated through case studies on two popular and contrasting datasets: MNIST and CIFAR10. We achieve an overall false acceptance rate (FAR) of less than 1%, given a preset false rejection rate (FRR) of 1%, for four different tested trojan trigger types---three triggers are identified in previous attack works and one dedicated trigger is crafted by us to demonstrate the trigger-size insensitivity of the STRIP detection approach. In particular, on the dataset of natural images in CIFAR10, we have empirically achieved the desired result of 0% for both FRR and FAR.

Includes members:
  Member "one pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "tabor a highly accurate approach to inspecting and restoring trojan backdoors in ai systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "februus input purification defense against trojan attacks on deep neural network systems")
  Member "detecting backdoor attacks on deep neural networks by activation clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence")
  Member "fine pruning defending against backdooring attacks on deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "entangled watermarks as a defense against model extraction")
  Member "model reuse attacks on deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sentinet detecting localized universal attacks against deep learning systems")
  Member "sentinet detecting physical attacks against deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "rab provable robustness against backdoor attacks")
  Member "turning your weakness into a strength watermarking deep neural networks by backdooring":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "entangled watermarks as a defense against model extraction")
  Member "backdoor embedding in convolutional neural network models via invisible perturbation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "rab provable robustness against backdoor attacks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)