human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "case study predictive fairness to reduce misdemeanor recidivism through social service interventions"):
  Abstract: The criminal justice system is currently ill-equipped to improve outcomes of individuals who cycle in and out of the system with a series of misdemeanor offenses. Often due to constraints of caseload and poor record linkage, prior interactions with an individual may not be considered when an individual comes back into the system, let alone in a proactive manner through the application of diversion programs. The Los Angeles City Attorney's Office recently created a new Recidivism Reduction and Drug Diversion unit (R2D2) tasked with reducing recidivism in this population. Here we describe a collaboration with this new unit as a case study for the incorporation of predictive equity into machine learning based decision making in a resource-constrained setting. The program seeks to improve outcomes by developing individually-tailored social service interventions (i.e., diversions, conditional plea agreements, stayed sentencing, or other favorable case disposition based on appropriate social service linkage rather than traditional sentencing methods) for individuals likely to experience subsequent interactions with the criminal justice system, a time and resource-intensive undertaking that necessitates an ability to focus resources on individuals most likely to be involved in a future case. Seeking to achieve both efficiency (through predictive accuracy) and equity (improving outcomes in traditionally under-served communities and working to mitigate existing disparities in criminal justice outcomes), we discuss the equity outcomes we seek to achieve, describe the corresponding choice of a metric for measuring predictive fairness in this context, and explore a set of options for balancing equity and efficiency when building and selecting machine learning models in an operational public policy setting.

Includes members:
  Member "putting fairness principles into practice challenges metrics and improvements":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "classification with fairness constraints a meta algorithm with provable guarantees":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "fairness by explicability and adversarial shap learning")
  Member "a reductions approach to fair classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "on formalizing fairness in prediction with machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "data and model dependencies of membership inference attack")
  Member "algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "equality of opportunity in supervised learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "censoring representations with an adversary":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "fairness through awareness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CY(Computers and Society)