human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "tabor a highly accurate approach to inspecting and restoring trojan backdoors in ai systems"):
  Abstract: A trojan backdoor is a hidden pattern typically implanted in a deep neural network. It could be activated and thus forces that infected model behaving abnormally only when an input data sample with a particular trigger present is fed to that model. As such, given a deep neural network model and clean input samples, it is very challenging to inspect and determine the existence of a trojan backdoor. Recently, researchers design and develop several pioneering solutions to address this acute problem. They demonstrate the proposed techniques have a great potential in trojan detection. However, we show that none of these existing techniques completely address the problem. On the one hand, they mostly work under an unrealistic assumption (e.g. assuming availability of the contaminated training database). On the other hand, the proposed techniques cannot accurately detect the existence of trojan backdoors, nor restore high-fidelity trojan backdoor images, especially when the triggers pertaining to the trojan vary in size, shape and position. In this work, we propose TABOR, a new trojan detection technique. Conceptually, it formalizes a trojan detection task as a non-convex optimization problem, and the detection of a trojan backdoor as the task of resolving the optimization through an objective function. Different from the existing technique also modeling trojan detection as an optimization problem, TABOR designs a new objective function--under the guidance of explainable AI techniques as well as heuristics--that could guide optimization to identify a trojan backdoor in a more effective fashion. In addition, TABOR defines a new metric to measure the quality of a trojan backdoor identified. Using an anomaly detection method, we show the new metric could better facilitate TABOR to identify intentionally injected triggers in an infected model and filter out false alarms......

Includes members:
  Member "understanding impacts of high order loss approximations and features in deep learning interpretation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "robust saliency maps with decoy enhanced saliency score")
  Member "strip a defence against trojan attacks on deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "dynamic backdoor attacks against machine learning models")
  Member "detecting backdoor attacks on deep neural networks by activation clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence")
  Member "fine pruning defending against backdooring attacks on deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "entangled watermarks as a defense against model extraction")
  Member "explaining deep learning models a bayesian non parametric approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "interpretability of blackbox machine learning models through dataview extraction and shadow model creation")
  Member "sentinet detecting physical attacks against deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "rab provable robustness against backdoor attacks")
  Member "textbugger generating adversarial text against real world applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "advbox a toolbox to generate adversarial examples that fool neural networks")
  Member "turning your weakness into a strength watermarking deep neural networks by backdooring":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "entangled watermarks as a defense against model extraction")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)