human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "differentially private distributed data summarization under covariate shift"):
  Abstract: We envision AI marketplaces to be platforms where consumers, with very less data for a target task, can obtain a relevant model by accessing many private data sources with vast number of data samples. One of the key challenges is to construct a training dataset that matches a target task without compromising on privacy of the data sources. To this end, we consider the following distributed data summarizataion problem. Given K private source datasets denoted by $[D_i]_{i\in [K]}$ and a small target validation set $D_v$, which may involve a considerable covariate shift with respect to the sources, compute a summary dataset $D_s\subseteq \bigcup_{i\in [K]} D_i$ such that its statistical distance from the validation dataset $D_v$ is minimized. We use the popular Maximum Mean Discrepancy as the measure of statistical distance. The non-private problem has received considerable attention in prior art, for example in prototype selection (Kim et al., NIPS 2016). Our work is the first to obtain strong differential privacy guarantees while ensuring the quality guarantees of the non-private version. We study this problem in a Parsimonious Curator Privacy Model, where a trusted curator coordinates the summarization process while minimizing the amount of private information accessed. Our central result is a novel protocol that (a) ensures the curator accesses at most $O(K^{\frac{1}{3}}|D_s| + |D_v|)$ points (b) has formal privacy guarantees on the leakage of information between the data owners and (c) closely matches the best known non-private greedy algorithm. Our protocol uses two hash functions, one inspired by the Rahimi-Recht random features method and the second leverages state of the art differential privacy mechanisms. We introduce a novel "noiseless" differentially private auctioning protocol for winner notification and demonstrate the efficacy of our protocol using real-world datasets.

Includes members:
  Member "clustering algorithms for the centralized and local models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "privacy preserving boosting in the local setting")
  Member "learning privately from multiparty data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "differentially private deep learning with smooth sensitivity")
  Member "differentially private stochastic gradient descent for in rdbms analytics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "differentially private mixture of generative neural networks")
  Member "bolt on differential privacy for scalable stochastic gradient descent based analytics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "guidelines for implementing and auditing differentially private systems")
  Member "communication efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "deep domain confusion maximizing for domain invariance":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "mutual mean teaching pseudo label refinery for unsupervised domain adaptation on person re identification")
  Member "the composition theorem for differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "dp cgan differentially private synthetic data and label generation")
  Member "a simple and practical algorithm for differentially private data release":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "a workload adaptive mechanism for linear queries under local differential privacy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)