human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "mmalfm explainable recommendation by leveraging reviews and images"):
  Abstract: Personalized rating prediction is an important research problem in recommender systems. Although the latent factor model (e.g., matrix factorization) achieves good accuracy in rating prediction, it suffers from many problems including cold-start, non-transparency, and suboptimal results for individual user-item pairs. In this article, we exploit textual reviews and item images together with ratings to tackle these limitations. Specifically, we first apply a proposed multi-modal aspect-aware topic model (MATM) on text reviews and item images to model users’ preferences and items’ features from different aspects, and also estimate the aspect importance of a user toward an item. Then, the aspect importance is integrated into a novel aspect-aware latent factor model (ALFM), which learns user’s and item’s latent factors based on ratings. In particular, ALFM introduces a weight matrix to associate those latent factors with the same set of aspects in MATM, such that the latent factors could be used to estimate aspect ratings. Finally, the overall rating is computed via a linear combination of the aspect ratings, which are weighted by the corresponding aspect importance. To this end, our model could alleviate the data sparsity problem and gain good interpretability for recommendation. Besides, every aspect rating is weighted by its aspect importance, which is dependent on the targeted user’s preferences and the targeted item’s features. Therefore, it is expected that the proposed method can model a user’s preferences on an item more accurately for each user-item pair. Comprehensive experimental studies have been conducted on the Yelp 2017 Challenge dataset and Amazon product datasets. Results show that (1) our method achieves significant improvement compared to strong baseline methods, especially for users with only few ratings; (2) item visual features can improve the prediction performance—the effects of item image features on improving the prediction results depend on the importance of the visual features for the items; and (3) our model can explicitly interpret the predicted results in great detail.

Includes members:
  Member "aspect aware latent factor model rating prediction with ratings and reviews":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "recommender systems based on generative adversarial networks a problem driven perspective")
  Member "neural factorization machines for sparse predictive analytics":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "parameter efficient transfer from sequential behaviors for user profiling and recommendation")
  Member "neural collaborative filtering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "advances in collaborative filtering and ranking")
  Member "fast matrix factorization for online recommendation with implicit feedback":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "learning to hash with graph neural networks for recommender systems")
  Member "joint deep modeling of users and items using reviews for recommendation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "transnets learning to transform for recommendation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "sherlock sparse hierarchical embeddings for visually aware one class collaborative filtering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "dressing as a whole outfit compatibility learning based on node wise graph neural networks")
  Member "ups and downs modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one class collaborative filtering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "learning to generate multiple style transfer outputs for an input sentence")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)