human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "telehammer a stealthy cross boundary rowhammer technique"):
  Abstract: Rowhammer exploits frequently access specific DRAM rows (i.e., hammer rows) to induce bit flips in their adjacent rows (i.e., victim rows), thus allowing an attacker to gain the privilege escalation or steal the private data. A key requirement of all such attacks is that an attacker must have access to at least part of a hammer row adjacent to sensitive victim rows. We refer to these rowhammer attacks as PeriHammer. The state-of-the-art software-only defences against PeriHammer attacks is to make such hammer rows inaccessible to the attacker. #R##N#In this paper, we question the necessity of the above requirement and propose a new class of rowhammer attacks, termed as TeleHammer. It is a paradigm shift in rowhammer attacks since it crosses memory boundary to stealthily rowhammer an inaccessible row by virtue of freeloading inherent features of modern hardware and/or software. We propose a generic model to rigorously formalize the necessary conditions to initiate TeleHammer and PeriHammer, respectively. Compared to PeriHammer, TeleHammer can defeat the advanced software-only defenses, stealthy in hiding itself and hard to mitigate. #R##N#To demonstrate the practicality of TeleHammer and its advantages, we have created a TeleHammer's instance, called PThammer, which leverages the address-translation feature of modern processors. We observe that a memory access can induce a fetch of a Level-1 page-table entry (PTE) from memory and thus cause hammering the PTE once. To achieve a high hammer-frequency, we flush relevant TLB and cache effectively and efficiently. To this end, PThammer can cross user-kernel boundary to rowhammer rows occupied by Level-1 PTEs and induce bit flips in adjacent victim rows that also host Level-1 PTEs. We have exploited PThammer to defeat advanced software-only defenses in bare-metal systems.

Includes members:
  Member "spectre attacks exploiting speculative execution":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards probabilistic verification of machine unlearning")
  Member "still hammerable and exploitable on the effectiveness of software only physical kernel isolation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "understanding rowhammer attacks through the lens of a unified reference framework")
  Member "nethammer inducing rowhammer faults through network requests":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "are we susceptible to rowhammer an end to end methodology for cloud providers")
  Member "another flip in the wall of rowhammer defenses":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "are we susceptible to rowhammer an end to end methodology for cloud providers")
  Member "drama exploiting dram addressing for cross cpu attacks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "are we susceptible to rowhammer an end to end methodology for cloud providers")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)