human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "covering convex bodies and the closest vector problem"):
  Abstract: We present algorithms for the $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate version of the closest vector problem for certain norms. The currently fastest algorithm (Dadush and Kun 2016) for general norms has running time of $2^{O(n)} (1/\epsilon)^n$. We improve this substantially in the following two cases. For $\ell_p$-norms with $p>2$ (resp. $p \in [1,2]$) fixed, we present an algorithm with a running time of $2^{O(n)} (1/\epsilon)^{n/2}$ (resp. $2^{O(n)} (1/\epsilon)^{n/p}$). This result is based on a geometric covering problem, that was introduced in the context of CVP by Eisenbrand et al.: How many convex bodies are needed to cover the ball of the norm such that, if scaled by two around their centroids, each one is contained in the $(1+\epsilon)$-scaled homothet of the norm ball? We provide upper bounds for this problem by exploiting the \emph{modulus of smoothness} of the $\ell_p$-balls. Applying a covering scheme, we can boost any constant approximation algorithm for CVP to a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm with the improved run time, either using a straightforward sampling routine or using the deterministic algorithm of Dadush for the construction of an epsilon net. The space requirement only depends on the constant approximation CVP solver used. Furthermore, we generalise the result of Eisenbrand et al. for the $\ell_\infty$-norm. For centrally symmetric polytopes (resp. zonotopes) with $O(n)$ facets (resp. generated by $O(n)$ line segments), we provide a deterministic $O(\log_2(1/\epsilon))^{O(n)}$ time algorithm. Finally, we establish a connection between the \emph{modulus of smoothness} and \emph{lattice sparsification}. Using the enumeration and sparsification tools developped by Dadush, Kun, Peikert and Vempala, this leads to a simple alternative to the boosting procedure for CVP under $\ell_p$-norms. This connection might be of independent interest.

Includes members:
  Member "on compact representations of voronoi cells of lattices":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "just take the average an embarrassingly simple 2 n time algorithm for svp and cvp":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "faster provable sieving algorithms for the shortest vector problem and the closest vector problem on lattices in 120001 p norm")
  Member "a deterministic polynomial space construction for eps nets under any norm":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "lattice sparsification and the approximate closest vector problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "faster provable sieving algorithms for the shortest vector problem and the closest vector problem on lattices in 120001 p norm")
  Member "a o 1 eps 2 n time sieving algorithm for approximate integer programming":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fine grained hardness of cvp p everything that we can prove and nothing else")
  Member "covering cubes and the closest vector problem":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "faster provable sieving algorithms for the shortest vector problem and the closest vector problem on lattices in 120001 p norm")
  Member "enumerative lattice algorithms in any norm via m ellipsoid coverings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "faster provable sieving algorithms for the shortest vector problem and the closest vector problem on lattices in 120001 p norm")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)