human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "evidence of distrust and disorientation towards immunization on online social media after contrasting political communication on vaccines results from an analysis of twitter data in italy"):
  Abstract: Background. Recently, In Italy the vaccination coverage for key immunizations, as MMR, has been declining, with measles outbreaks. In 2017, the Italian Government expanded the number of mandatory immunizations establishing penalties for families of unvaccinated children. During the 2018 elections campaign, immunization policy entered the political debate, with the government accusing oppositions of fuelling vaccine scepticism. A new government established in 2018 temporarily relaxed penalties and announced the introduction of flexibility. #R##N#Objectives and Methods. By a sentiment analysis on tweets posted in Italian during 2018, we aimed at (i) characterising the temporal flow of communication on vaccines, (ii) evaluating the usefulness of Twitter data for estimating vaccination parameters, and (iii) investigating whether the ambiguous political communication might have originated disorientation among the public. #R##N#Results. The population appeared to be mostly composed by "serial twitterers" tweeting about everything including vaccines. Tweets favourable to vaccination accounted for 75% of retained tweets, undecided for 14% and unfavourable for 11%. Twitter activity of the Italian public health institutions was negligible. After smoothing the temporal pattern, an up-and-down trend in the favourable proportion emerged, synchronized with the switch between governments, providing clear evidence of disorientation. #R##N#Conclusion. The reported evidence of disorientation documents that critical health topics, as immunization, should never be used for political consensus. This is especially true given the increasing role of online social media as information source, which might yield to social pressures eventually harmful for vaccine uptake, and is worsened by the lack of institutional presence on Twitter. This calls for efforts to contrast misinformation and the ensuing spread of hesitancy.

Includes members:
  Member "polarization of the vaccination debate on facebook":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the covid 19 social media infodemic")
  Member "science vs conspiracy collective narratives in the age of misinformation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the covid 19 social media infodemic")
  Member "emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "towards understanding the information ecosystem through the lens of multiple web communities")
  Member "a planetary nervous system for social mining and collective awareness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "an analytical framework to nowcast well being using mobile phone data")
  Member "assessing vaccination sentiments with online social media implications for infectious disease dynamics and control":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "mining social media data for biomedical signals and health related behavior")
  Member "machine learning in automated text categorization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "utilizing neural networks and linguistic metadata for early detection of depression indications in text sequences")
  Member "thumbs up sentiment classification using machine learning techniques":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "description based text classification with reinforcement learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)