human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the query complexity of mastermind with ell_p distances"):
  Abstract: Consider a variant of the Mastermind game in which queries are $\ell_p$ distances, rather than the usual Hamming distance. That is, a codemaker chooses a hidden vector $\mathbf{y}\in\{-k,-k+1,\dots,k-1,k\}^n$ and answers to queries of the form $\Vert\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\Vert_p$ where $\mathbf{x}\in\{-k,-k+1,\dots,k-1,k\}^n$. The goal is to minimize the number of queries made in order to correctly guess $\mathbf{y}$. #R##N#Motivated by this question, in this work, we develop a nonadaptive polynomial time algorithm that works for a natural class of separable distance measures, i.e.\ coordinate-wise sums of functions of the absolute value. This in particular includes distances such as the smooth max (LogSumExp) as well as many widely-studied $M$-estimator losses, such as $\ell_p$ norms, the $\ell_1$-$\ell_2$ loss, the Huber loss, and the Fair estimator loss. When we apply this result to $\ell_p$ queries, we obtain an upper bound of $O\left(\min\left\{n,\frac{n\log k}{\log n}\right\}\right)$ queries for any real $1\leq p 0$. Thus, essentially any approximation of this problem is as hard as finding the hidden vector exactly, up to constant factors. Finally, we show that for the noisy version of the problem, i.e. the setting when the codemaker answers queries with any $q = (1\pm\varepsilon)\Vert\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\Vert_p$, there is no query efficient algorithm.

Includes members:
  Member "the query complexity of a permutation based variant of mastermind":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "working principles of binary differential evolution")
  Member "playing mastermind with many colors":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the advantages of multiple classes for reducing overfitting from test set reuse")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)