human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a novel method for extracting interpretable knowledge from a spiking neural classifier with time varying synaptic weights"):
  Abstract: This paper presents a novel method for information interpretability in an MC-SEFRON classifier. To develop a method to extract knowledge stored in a trained classifier, first, the binary-class SEFRON classifier developed earlier is extended to handle multi-class problems. MC-SEFRON uses the population encoding scheme to encode the real-valued input data into spike patterns. MC-SEFRON is trained using the same supervised learning rule used in the SEFRON. After training, the proposed method extracts the knowledge for a given class stored in the classifier by mapping the weighted postsynaptic potential in the time domain to the feature domain as Feature Strength Functions (FSFs). A set of FSFs corresponding to each output class represents the extracted knowledge from the classifier. This knowledge encoding method is derived to maintain consistency between the classification in the time domain and the feature domain. The correctness of the FSF is quantitatively measured by using FSF directly for classification tasks. For a given input, each FSF is sampled at the input value to obtain the corresponding feature strength value (FSV). Then the aggregated FSVs obtained for each class are used to determine the output class labels during classification. FSVs are also used to interpret the predictions during the classification task. Using ten UCI datasets and the MNIST dataset, the knowledge extraction method, interpretation and the reliability of the FSF are demonstrated. Based on the studies, it can be seen that on an average, the difference in the classification accuracies using the FSF directly and those obtained by MC-SEFRON is only around 0.9% & 0.1\% for the UCI datasets and the MNIST dataset respectively. This clearly shows that the knowledge represented by the FSFs has acceptable reliability and the interpretability of classification using the classifier's knowledge has been justified.

Includes members:
  Member "deep learning in spiking neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a supervised learning algorithm for multilayer spiking neural networks based on temporal coding toward energy efficient vlsi processor design")
  Member "interpreting cnns via decision trees":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "leveraging rationales to improve human task performance")
  Member "a unified approach to interpreting model predictions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "bp stdp approximating backpropagation using spike timing dependent plasticity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a biologically plausible supervised learning method for spiking neural networks using the symmetric stdp rule")
  Member "distilling a neural network into a soft decision tree":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "interpretation and simplification of deep forest")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "training deep spiking neural networks using backpropagation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "matrix lstm a differentiable recurrent surface for asynchronous event based data")
  Member "event driven contrastive divergence for spiking neuromorphic systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "sbsnn stochastic bits enabled binary spiking neural network with on chip learning for energy efficient neuromorphic computing at the edge")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)