human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "defense in depth a recipe for logic locking to prevail"):
  Abstract: Logic locking has emerged as a promising solution for protecting the semiconductor intellectual Property (IP) from the untrusted entities in the design and fabrication process. Logic locking hides the functionality of the IP by embedding additional key-gates in the circuit. The correct output of the chip is produced, once the correct key value is available at the input of the key-gates. The confidentiality of the key is imperative for the security of the locked IP as it stands as the lone barrier against IP infringement. Therefore, the logic locking is considered as a broken scheme once the key value is exposed. The research community has shown the vulnerability of the logic locking techniques against different classes of attacks, such as Oracle-guided and physical attacks. Although several countermeasures have already been proposed against such attacks, none of them is simultaneously impeccable against Oracle-guided, Oracle-less, and physical attacks. Under such circumstances, a defense-in-depth approach can be considered as a practical approach in addressing the vulnerabilities of logic locking. Defense-in-depth is a multilayer defense approach where several independent countermeasures are implemented in the device to provide aggregated protection against different attack vectors. Introducing such a multilayer defense model in logic locking is the major contribution of this paper. With regard to this, we first identify the core components of logic locking schemes, which need to be protected. Afterwards, we categorize the vulnerabilities of core components according to potential threats for the locking key in logic locking schemes. Furthermore, we propose several defense layers and countermeasures to protect the device from those vulnerabilities. Finally, we turn our focus to open research questions and conclude with suggestions for future research directions.

Includes members:
  Member "functional analysis attacks on logic locking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "dfssd deep faults and shallow state duality a provably strong obfuscation solution for circuits with restricted access to scan chain")
  Member "taal tampering attack on any key based logic locked circuits":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "threats on logic locking a decade later":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "dfssd deep faults and shallow state duality a provably strong obfuscation solution for circuits with restricted access to scan chain")
  Member "sail machine learning guided structural analysis attack on hardware obfuscation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "hardware security for and beyond cmos technology an overview on fundamentals applications and challenges")
  Member "logic locking for secure outsourced chip fabrication a new attack and provably secure defense mechanism":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "hardware security for and beyond cmos technology an overview on fundamentals applications and challenges")
  Member "physical design obfuscation of hardware a comprehensive investigation of device and logic level techniques":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "protect your chip design intellectual property an overview")
  Member "threshold based obfuscated keys with quantifiable security against invasive readout":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)