human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "pure entropic regularization for metrical task systems"):
  Abstract: We show that on every $n$-point HST metric, there is a randomized online algorithm for metrical task systems (MTS) that is $1$-competitive for service costs and $O(\log n)$-competitive for movement costs. In general, these refined guarantees are optimal up to the implicit constant. While an $O(\log n)$-competitive algorithm for MTS on HST metrics was developed by Bubeck et al., that approach could only establish an $O((\log n)^2)$-competitive ratio when the service costs are required to be $O(1)$-competitive. Our algorithm can be viewed as an instantiation of online mirror descent with the regularizer derived from a multiscale conditional entropy. #R##N#In fact, our algorithm satisfies a set of even more refined guarantees; we are able to exploit this property to combine it with known random embedding theorems and obtain, for any $n$-point metric space, a randomized algorithm that is $1$-competitive for service costs and $O((\log n)^2)$-competitive for movement costs.

Includes members:
  Member "metrical task systems on trees via mirror descent and unfair gluing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the online min sum set cover problem")
  Member "regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi armed bandit problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "multi source domain adaptation for text classification via distancenet bandits")
  Member "better algorithms for unfair metrical task systems and applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "competitive ratio versus regret minimization achieving the best of both worlds")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)