human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "language independent tokenisation rivals language specific tokenisation for word similarity prediction"):
  Abstract: Language-independent tokenisation (LIT) methods that do not require labelled language resources or lexicons have recently gained popularity because of their applicability in resource-poor languages. Moreover, they compactly represent a language using a fixed size vocabulary and can efficiently handle unseen or rare words. On the other hand, language-specific tokenisation (LST) methods have a long and established history, and are developed using carefully created lexicons and training resources. Unlike subtokens produced by LIT methods, LST methods produce valid morphological subwords. Despite the contrasting trade-offs between LIT vs. LST methods, their performance on downstream NLP tasks remain unclear. In this paper, we empirically compare the two approaches using semantic similarity measurement as an evaluation task across a diverse set of languages. Our experimental results covering eight languages show that LST consistently outperforms LIT when the vocabulary size is large, but LIT can produce comparable or better results than LST in many languages with comparatively smaller (i.e. less than 100K words) vocabulary sizes, encouraging the use of LIT when language-specific resources are unavailable, incomplete or a smaller model is required. Moreover, we find that smoothed inverse frequency (SIF) to be an accurate method to create word embeddings from subword embeddings for multilingual semantic similarity prediction tasks. Further analysis of the nearest neighbours of tokens show that semantically and syntactically related tokens are closely embedded in subword embedding spaces

Includes members:
  Member "analogies explained towards understanding word embeddings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "product knowledge graph embedding for e commerce")
  Member "word similarity datasets for thai construction and evaluation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "a systematic study of leveraging subword information for learning word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "how multilingual is multilingual bert":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "sentencepiece a simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "multilingual denoising pre training for neural machine translation")
  Member "generalizing word embeddings using bag of subwords":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "hierarchical character embeddings learning phonological and semantic representations in languages of logographic origin using recursive neural networks")
  Member "subword regularization improving neural network translation models with multiple subword candidates":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "fastai a layered api for deep learning")
  Member "adapting word embeddings to new languages with morphological and phonological subword representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "on the importance of subword information for morphological tasks in truly low resource languages")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)