human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deep neural networks for choice analysis architectural design with alternative specific utility functions"):
  Abstract: Whereas deep neural network (DNN) is increasingly applied to choice analysis, it is challenging to reconcile domain-specific behavioral knowledge with generic-purpose DNN, to improve DNN's interpretability and predictive power, and to identify effective regularization methods for specific tasks. This study designs a particular DNN architecture with alternative-specific utility functions (ASU-DNN) by using prior behavioral knowledge. Unlike a fully connected DNN (F-DNN), which computes the utility value of an alternative k by using the attributes of all the alternatives, ASU-DNN computes it by using only k's own attributes. Theoretically, ASU-DNN can dramatically reduce the estimation error of F-DNN because of its lighter architecture and sparser connectivity. Empirically, ASU-DNN has 2-3% higher prediction accuracy than F-DNN over the whole hyperparameter space in a private dataset that we collected in Singapore and a public dataset in R mlogit package. The alternative-specific connectivity constraint, as a domain-knowledge-based regularization method, is more effective than the most popular generic-purpose explicit and implicit regularization methods and architectural hyperparameters. ASU-DNN is also more interpretable because it provides a more regular substitution pattern of travel mode choices than F-DNN does. The comparison between ASU-DNN and F-DNN can also aid in testing the behavioral knowledge. Our results reveal that individuals are more likely to compute utility by using an alternative's own attributes, supporting the long-standing practice in choice modeling. Overall, this study demonstrates that prior behavioral knowledge could be used to guide the architecture design of DNN, to function as an effective domain-knowledge-based regularization method, and to improve both the interpretability and predictive power of DNN in choice analysis.

Includes members:
  Member "methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "sam the sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters")
  Member "bohb robust and efficient hyperparameter optimization at scale":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "improving the adversarial robustness and interpretability of deep neural networks by regularizing their input gradients":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "size independent sample complexity of neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the implicit and explicit regularization effects of dropout")
  Member "nearly tight vc dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "on the generalization of bayesian deep nets for multi class classification")
  Member "understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "learning functions when is deep better than shallow":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "learning the mapping mathbf x mapsto sum_ i 1 d x_i 2 the cost of finding the needle in a haystack")
  Member "the mythos of model interpretability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)