human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "an active approach for model interpretation"):
  Abstract: Model interpretation, or explanation of a machine learning classifier, aims to extract generalizable knowledge from a trained classifier into a human-understandable format, for various purposes such as model assessment, debugging and trust. From a computaional viewpoint, it is formulated as approximating the target classifier using a simpler interpretable model, such as rule models like a decision set/list/tree. Often, this approximation is handled as standard supervised learning and the only difference is that the labels are provided by the target classifier instead of ground truth. This paradigm is particularly popular because there exists a variety of well-studied supervised algorithms for learning an interpretable classifier. However, we argue that this paradigm is suboptimal for it does not utilize the unique property of the model interpretation problem, that is, the ability to generate synthetic instances and query the target classifier for their labels. We call this the active-query property, suggesting that we should consider model interpretation from an active learning perspective. Following this insight, we argue that the active-query property should be employed when designing a model interpretation algorithm, and that the generation of synthetic instances should be integrated seamlessly with the algorithm that learns the model interpretation. In this paper, we demonstrate that by doing so, it is possible to achieve more faithful interpretation with simpler model complexity. As a technical contribution, we present an active algorithm Active Decision Set Induction (ADS) to learn a decision set, a set of if-else rules, for model interpretation. ADS performs a local search over the space of all decision sets. In every iteration, ADS computes confidence intervals for the value of the objective function of all local actions and utilizes active-query to determine the best one.

Includes members:
  Member "why did you do that explaining black box models with inductive synthesis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "open the black box data driven explanation of black box decision systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety")
  Member "rule induction for global explanation of trained models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "metafeatures based rule extraction for classifiers on behavioral and textual data")
  Member "rulematrix visualizing and understanding classifiers with rules":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "explainer a visual analytics framework for interactive and explainable machine learning")
  Member "local rule based explanations of black box decision systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences")
  Member "interpretable explorable approximations of black box models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "explainability fact sheets a framework for systematic assessment of explainable approaches")
  Member "interpreting blackbox models via model extraction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "right for the wrong scientific reasons revising deep networks by interacting with their explanations")
  Member "scalable bayesian rule lists":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "interpretation and simplification of deep forest")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)