human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "recursive algorithms to repair prioritized and inconsistent dl lite knowledge base"):
  Abstract: The inconsistency in prioritized knowledge base is because the assertions (ABoxes) come from several sources with different levels of reliability. We introduce the handling of this inconsistency problem to query inconsistent \textit{DL-Lite} knowledge bases. In the literature, firstly, repair all the inconsistent assertions of the \textit{DL-Lite}'s inconsistent knowledge base. Then, interrogate it. However, our algorithm, on proceeds directly with an interrogation of the knowledge base in order to recover an exhaustive list of answers to a given query. In a second time, to repair the answers of this list. The novelty of our article is the proposition of a recurring function that calculates the rank of coherence in order to manage the inconsistencies in the set of responses. This strategy allowed us to reduce execution time compared to existing algorithms. The experimental study as well as the analysis of the results, which we carried out, showed that our algorithm is much more productive than the other algorithms since it gives the greatest number of answers while remaining the best from the point of view of the execution time. Finally, as shown in our experimental studies, they allow an efficient handling of inconsistency. Such facts make all the repairs suitable for \textit{DL-Lite

Includes members:
  Member "a general modifier based framework for inconsistency tolerant query answering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "prioritized repairing and consistent query answering in relational databases":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "querying and repairing inconsistent prioritized knowledge bases complexity analysis and links with abstract argumentation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)