human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "meta learning for fast classifier adaptation to new users of signature verification systems"):
  Abstract: Offline Handwritten Signature verification presents a challenging Pattern Recognition problem, where only knowledge of the positive class is available for training. While classifiers have access to a few genuine signatures for training, during generalization they also need to discriminate forgeries. This is particularly challenging for skilled forgeries, where a forger practices imitating the user's signature, and often is able to create forgeries visually close to the original signatures. Most work in the literature address this issue by training for a surrogate objective: discriminating genuine signatures of a user and random forgeries (signatures from other users). In this work, we propose a solution for this problem based on meta-learning, where there are two levels of learning: a task-level (where a task is to learn a classifier for a given user) and a meta-level (learning across tasks). In particular, the meta-learner guides the adaptation (learning) of a classifier for each user, which is a lightweight operation that only requires genuine signatures. The meta-learning procedure learns what is common for the classification across different users. In a scenario where skilled forgeries from a subset of users are available, the meta-learner can guide classifiers to be discriminative of skilled forgeries even if the classifiers themselves do not use skilled forgeries for learning. Experiments conducted on the GPDS-960 dataset show improved performance compared to Writer-Independent systems, and achieve results comparable to state-of-the-art Writer-Dependent systems in the regime of few samples per user (5 reference signatures).

Includes members:
  Member "learning deep features for one class classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "deep learning achieves perfect anomaly detection on 108 308 retinal images including unlearned diseases")
  Member "meta dataset a dataset of datasets for learning to learn from few examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "how to train your maml":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "deepemd few shot image classification with differentiable earth mover s distance and structured classifiers")
  Member "a writer independent approach for offline signature verification using deep convolutional neural networks features":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "biometric recognition using deep learning a survey")
  Member "fixed sized representation learning from offline handwritten signatures of different sizes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "multi representational learning for offline signature verification using multi loss snapshot ensemble of cnns")
  Member "offline handwritten signature verification literature review":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "multi representational learning for offline signature verification using multi loss snapshot ensemble of cnns")
  Member "learning features for offline handwritten signature verification using deep convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "character independent font identification")
  Member "model agnostic meta learning for fast adaptation of deep networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)