human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "neutaint efficient dynamic taint analysis with neural networks"):
  Abstract: Dynamic taint analysis (DTA) is widely used by various applications to track information flow during runtime execution. Existing DTA techniques use rule-based taint-propagation, which is neither accurate (i.e., high false positive) nor efficient (i.e., large runtime overhead). It is hard to specify taint rules for each operation while covering all corner cases correctly. Moreover, the overtaint and undertaint errors can accumulate during the propagation of taint information across multiple operations. Finally, rule-based propagation requires each operation to be inspected before applying the appropriate rules resulting in prohibitive performance overhead on large real-world applications. #R##N#In this work, we propose NEUTAINT, a novel end-to-end approach to track information flow using neural program embeddings. The neural program embeddings model the target's programs computations taking place between taint sources and sinks, which automatically learns the information flow by observing a diverse set of execution traces. To perform lightweight and precise information flow analysis, we utilize saliency maps to reason about most influential sources for different sinks. NEUTAINT constructs two saliency maps, a popular machine learning approach to influence analysis, to summarize both coarse-grained and fine-grained information flow in the neural program embeddings. #R##N#We compare NEUTAINT with 3 state-of-the-art dynamic taint analysis tools. The evaluation results show that NEUTAINT can achieve 68% accuracy, on average, which is 10% improvement while reducing 40 times runtime overhead over the second-best taint tool Libdft on 6 real world programs. NEUTAINT also achieves 61% more edge coverage when used for taint-guided fuzzing indicating the effectiveness of the identified influential bytes.

Includes members:
  Member "neuro symbolic execution the feasibility of an inductive approach to symbolic execution":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "neuzz efficient fuzzing with neural program smoothing")
  Member "vuldeepecker a deep learning based system for vulnerability detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "meuzz smart seed scheduling for hybrid fuzzing")
  Member "smartseed smart seed generation for efficient fuzzing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a systematic review of fuzzing based on machine learning techniques")
  Member "neuzz efficient fuzzing with neural program smoothing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "privacy for all demystify vulnerability disparity of differential privacy against membership inference attack")
  Member "angora efficient fuzzing by principled search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "meuzz smart seed scheduling for hybrid fuzzing")
  Member "robustfill neural program learning under noisy i o":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "intelligence physics and information the tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity in machine learning")
  Member "end to end prediction of buffer overruns from raw source code via neural memory networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "neural bug finding a study of opportunities and challenges")
  Member "axiomatic attribution for deep networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "adversarial attacks and defenses on graphs a review and empirical study")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)