human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "refuge challenge a unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs"):
  Abstract: Abstract   Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible but preventable blindness in working age populations. Color fundus photography (CFP) is the most cost-effective imaging modality to screen for retinal disorders. However, its application to glaucoma has been limited to the computation of a few related biomarkers such as the vertical cup-to-disc ratio. Deep learning approaches, although widely applied for medical image analysis, have not been extensively used for glaucoma assessment due to the limited size of the available data sets. Furthermore, the lack of a standardize benchmark strategy makes difficult to compare existing methods in a uniform way. In order to overcome these issues we set up the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge, REFUGE ( https://refuge.grand-challenge.org ), held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018. The challenge consisted of two primary tasks, namely optic disc/cup segmentation and glaucoma classification. As part of REFUGE, we have publicly released a data set of 1200 fundus images with ground truth segmentations and clinical glaucoma labels, currently the largest existing one. We have also built an evaluation framework to ease and ensure fairness in the comparison of different models, encouraging the development of novel techniques in the field. 12 teams qualified and participated in the online challenge. This paper summarizes their methods and analyzes their corresponding results. In particular, we observed that two of the top-ranked teams outperformed two human experts in the glaucoma classification task. Furthermore, the segmentation results were in general consistent with the ground truth annotations, with complementary outcomes that can be further exploited by ensembling the results.

Includes members:
  Member "patch based output space adversarial learning for joint optic disc and cup segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hierarchical attention networks for medical image segmentation")
  Member "classification of findings with localized lesions in fundoscopic images using a regionally guided cnn":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "ophthalmic diagnosis using deep learning with fundus images a critical review")
  Member "mobilenetv2 inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "predicting cardiovascular risk factors in retinal fundus photographs using deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "unsupervised learning of audio perception for robotics applications learning to project data to t sne umap space")
  Member "why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "nnu net breaking the spell on successful medical image segmentation")
  Member "joint optic disc and cup segmentation based on multi label deep network and polar transformation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "multi organ segmentation over partially labeled datasets with multi scale feature abstraction")
  Member "deep learning to assess glaucoma risk and associated features in fundus images":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "encoder decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "learning enriched features for real image restoration and enhancement")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)