human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "teaching responsible data science charting new pedagogical territory"):
  Abstract: Although numerous ethics courses are available, with many focusing specifically on technology and computer ethics, pedagogical approaches employed in these courses rely exclusively on texts rather than on software development or data analysis. Technical students often consider these courses unimportant and a distraction from the "real" material. To develop instructional materials and methodologies that are thoughtful and engaging, we must strive for balance: between texts and coding, between critique and solution, and between cutting-edge research and practical applicability. Finding such balance is particularly difficult in the nascent field of responsible data science (RDS), where we are only starting to understand how to interface between the intrinsically different methodologies of engineering and social sciences. In this paper we recount a recent experience in developing and teaching an RDS course to graduate and advanced undergraduate students in data science. We then dive into an area that is critically important to RDS -- transparency and interpretability of machine-assisted decision-making, and tie this area to the needs of emerging RDS curricula. Recounting our own experience, and leveraging literature on pedagogical methods in data science and beyond, we propose the notion of an "object-to-interpret-with". We link this notion to "nutritional labels" -- a family of interpretability tools that are gaining popularity in RDS research and practice. With this work we aim to contribute to the nascent area of RDS education, and to inspire others in the community to come together to develop a deeper theoretical understanding of the pedagogical needs of RDS, and contribute concrete educational materials and methodologies that others can use. All course materials are publicly available at this https URL.

Includes members:
  Member "problem formulation and fairness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "no computation without representation avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversity")
  Member "a nutritional label for rankings":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "explainability fact sheets a framework for systematic assessment of explainable approaches")
  Member "datasheets for datasets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "explainability fact sheets a framework for systematic assessment of explainable approaches")
  Member "explaining explanations an overview of interpretability of machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "manipulating and measuring model interpretability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences")
  Member "the dataset nutrition label a framework to drive higher data quality standards":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "explainability fact sheets a framework for systematic assessment of explainable approaches")
  Member "a unified approach to interpreting model predictions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "measuring fairness in ranked outputs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "fair correlation clustering")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CY(Computers and Society)