human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "disentangling feature and lazy learning in deep neural networks an empirical study"):
  Abstract: Two distinct limits for deep learning as the net width $h\to\infty$ have been proposed, depending on how the weights of the last layer scale with $h$. In the "lazy-learning" regime, the dynamics becomes linear in the weights and is described by a Neural Tangent Kernel $\Theta$. By contrast, in the "feature-learning" regime, the dynamics can be expressed in terms of the density distribution of the weights. Understanding which regime describes accurately practical architectures and which one leads to better performance remains a challenge. We answer these questions and produce new characterizations of these regimes for the MNIST data set, by considering deep nets $f$ whose last layer of weights scales as $\frac{\alpha}{\sqrt{h}}$ at initialization, where $\alpha$ is a parameter we vary. We performed systematic experiments on two setups (A) fully-connected Softplus momentum full batch and (B) convolutional ReLU momentum stochastic. We find that (1) $\alpha^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{h}}$ separates the two regimes. (2) for (A) and (B) feature learning outperforms lazy learning, a difference in performance that decreases with $h$ and becomes hardly detectable asymptotically for (A) but is very significant for (B). (3) In both regimes, the fluctuations $\delta f$ induced by initial conditions on the learned function follow $\delta f\sim1/\sqrt{h}$, leading to a performance that increases with $h$. This improvement can be instead obtained at intermediate $h$ values by ensemble averaging different networks. (4) In the feature regime there exists a time scale $t_1\sim\alpha\sqrt{h}$, such that for $t\ll t_1$ the dynamics is linear. At $t\sim t_1$, the output has grown by a magnitude $\sqrt{h}$ and the changes of the tangent kernel $\|\Delta\Theta\|$ become significant. Ultimately, it follows $\|\Delta\Theta\|\sim(\sqrt{h}\alpha)^{-a}$ for ReLU and Softplus activation, with $a<2$ & $a\to2$ when depth grows.

Includes members:
  Member "a tail index analysis of stochastic gradient noise in deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "unique properties of wide minima in deep networks")
  Member "a jamming transition from under to over parametrization affects generalization in deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "self adaptive training beyond empirical risk minimization")
  Member "scaling limits of wide neural networks with weight sharing gaussian process behavior gradient independence and neural tangent kernel derivation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "asymptotics of wide networks from feynman diagrams":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "on the infinite width limit of neural networks with a standard parameterization")
  Member "the effect of network width on stochastic gradient descent and generalization an empirical study":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "batch normalization biases deep residual networks towards shallow paths")
  Member "the asymptotic spectrum of the hessian of dnn throughout training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "disentangling feature and lazy training in deep neural networks")
  Member "mean field limit of the learning dynamics of multilayer neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "a rigorous framework for the mean field limit of multilayer neural networks")
  Member "on exact computation with an infinitely wide neural net":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)