human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "visual tracking via dynamic memory networks"):
  Abstract: Template-matching methods for visual tracking have gained popularity recently due to their good performance and fast speed. However, they lack effective ways to adapt to changes in the target object's appearance, making their tracking accuracy still far from state-of-the-art. In this paper, we propose a dynamic memory network to adapt the template to the target's appearance variations during tracking. The reading and writing process of the external memory is controlled by an LSTM network with the search feature map as input. A spatial attention mechanism is applied to concentrate the LSTM input on the potential target as the location of the target is at first unknown. To prevent aggressive model adaptivity, we apply gated residual template learning to control the amount of retrieved memory that is used to combine with the initial template. In order to alleviate the drift problem, we also design a "negative" memory unit that stores templates for distractors, which are used to cancel out wrong responses from the object template. To further boost the tracking performance, an auxiliary classification loss is added after the feature extractor part. Unlike tracking-by-detection methods where the object's information is maintained by the weight parameters of neural networks, which requires expensive online fine-tuning to be adaptable, our tracker runs completely feed-forward and adapts to the target's appearance changes by updating the external memory. Moreover, the capacity of our model is not determined by the network size as with other trackers --- the capacity can be easily enlarged as the memory requirements of a task increase, which is favorable for memorizing long-term object information. Extensive experiments on the OTB and VOT datasets demonstrate that our trackers perform favorably against state-of-the-art tracking methods while retaining real-time speed.

Includes members:
  Member "a twofold siamese network for real time object tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "spark spatial aware online incremental attack against visual tracking")
  Member "learning dynamic memory networks for object tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "object adaptive lstm network for real time visual tracking with adversarial data augmentation")
  Member "recurrent filter learning for visual tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "object adaptive lstm network for real time visual tracking with adversarial data augmentation")
  Member "end to end representation learning for correlation filter based tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "siamese attentional keypoint network for high performance visual tracking")
  Member "mavot memory augmented video object tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "dawn dual augmented memory network for unsupervised video object tracking")
  Member "learning spatial aware regressions for visual tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "siamese attentional keypoint network for high performance visual tracking")
  Member "learning policies for adaptive tracking with deep feature cascades":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "object adaptive lstm network for real time visual tracking with adversarial data augmentation")
  Member "dual deep network for visual tracking":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "siamese attentional keypoint network for high performance visual tracking")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)