human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a 2 3 approximation algorithm for vertex weighted matching"):
  Abstract: We consider the maximum vertex-weighted matching problem (MVM) for non-bipartite graphs. In earlier work we have described a 2/3-approximation algorithm for the MVM on bipartite graphs (Dobrian, Halappanavar, Pothen and Al-Herz, SIAM J. Scientific Computing, 2019). Here we show that a 2/3-approximation algorithm for MVM on non-bipartite graphs can be obtained by restricting the length of augmenting paths to at most three. The algorithm has time complexity $O(m \log \Delta + n \log n)$, where $n$ is the number of vertices, $m$ is the number of edges, and $\Delta$ is the maximum degree of a vertex. #R##N#The approximation ratio of the algorithm is obtained by considering failed vertices, i.e., vertices that the approximation algorithm fails to match but the exact algorithm does. We show that there are two distinct heavier matched vertices that we can charge each failed vertex to. Our proof techniques characterize the structure of augmenting paths in a novel way. #R##N#We have implemented the 2/3-approximation algorithm and show that it runs in under a minute on graphs with tens of millions of vertices and hundreds of millions of edges. We compare its performance with five other algorithms: an exact algorithm for MVM, an exact algorithm for the maximum edge-weighted matching (MEM) problem, as well as three approximation algorithms. In our test set of nineteen problems, there are graphs on which the exact algorithms fail to terminate in 100 hours. The new 2/3-approximation algorithm for MVM outperforms the other approximation algorithms by either being faster (often by orders of magnitude) or obtaining better weights.

Includes members:
  Member "a 2 3 approximation algorithm for vertex weighted matching in bipartite graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "scaling algorithms for weighted matching in general graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a scaling algorithm for weighted f factors in general graphs")
  Member "online vertex weighted bipartite matching and single bid budgeted allocations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "online graph matching problems with a worst case reassignment budget")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)