human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "classification accuracy score for conditional generative models"):
  Abstract: Deep generative models (DGMs) of images are now sufficiently mature that they produce nearly photorealistic samples and obtain scores similar to the data distribution on heuristics such as Frechet Inception Distance (FID). These results, especially on large-scale datasets such as ImageNet, suggest that DGMs are learning the data distribution in a perceptually meaningful space and can be used in downstream tasks. To test this latter hypothesis, we use class-conditional generative models from a number of model classes---variational autoencoders, autoregressive models, and generative adversarial networks (GANs)---to infer the class labels of real data. We perform this inference by training an image classifier using only synthetic data and using the classifier to predict labels on real data. The performance on this task, which we call Classification Accuracy Score (CAS), reveals some surprising results not identified by traditional metrics and constitute our contributions. First, when using a state-of-the-art GAN (BigGAN-deep), Top-1 and Top-5 accuracy decrease by 27.9\% and 41.6\%, respectively, compared to the original data; and conditional generative models from other model classes, such as Vector-Quantized Variational Autoencoder-2 (VQ-VAE-2) and Hierarchical Autoregressive Models (HAMs), substantially outperform GANs on this benchmark. Second, CAS automatically surfaces particular classes for which generative models failed to capture the data distribution, and were previously unknown in the literature. Third, we find traditional GAN metrics such as Inception Score (IS) and FID neither predictive of CAS nor useful when evaluating non-GAN models. Furthermore, in order to facilitate better diagnoses of generative models, we open-source the proposed metric.

Includes members:
  Member "training discriminative models to evaluate generative ones":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "mining gold samples for conditional gans")
  Member "generating diverse high fidelity images with vq vae 2":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "memory based graph networks")
  Member "hype a benchmark for human eye perceptual evaluation of generative models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on the evaluation of conditional gans")
  Member "hierarchical autoregressive image models with auxiliary decoders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "hierarchical quantized autoencoders")
  Member "cgans with projection discriminator":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "object centric image generation from layouts")
  Member "how good is my gan":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adaptive density estimation for generative models")
  Member "geometry score a method for comparing generative adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "topology distance a topology based approach for evaluating generative adversarial networks")
  Member "on accurate evaluation of gans for language generation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "bert as a teacher contextual embeddings for sequence level reward")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)