human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "diagnostic accuracy of content based dermatoscopic image retrieval with deep classification features"):
  Abstract: Background: Automated classification of medical images through neural networks can reach high accuracy rates but lack interpretability. #R##N#Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy obtained by using content based image retrieval (CBIR) to retrieve visually similar dermatoscopic images with corresponding disease labels against predictions made by a neural network. #R##N#Methods: A neural network was trained to predict disease classes on dermatoscopic images from three retrospectively collected image datasets containing 888, 2750 and 16691 images respectively. Diagnosis predictions were made based on the most commonly occurring diagnosis in visually similar images, or based on the top-1 class prediction of the softmax output from the network. Outcome measures were area under the ROC curve for predicting a malignant lesion (AUC), multiclass-accuracy and mean average precision (mAP), measured on unseen test images of the corresponding dataset. #R##N#Results: In all three datasets the skin cancer predictions from CBIR (evaluating the 16 most similar images) showed AUC values similar to softmax predictions (0.842, 0.806 and 0.852 versus 0.830, 0.810 and 0.847 respectively; p-value>0.99 for all). Similarly, the multiclass-accuracy of CBIR was comparable to softmax predictions. Networks trained for detecting only 3 classes performed better on a dataset with 8 classes when using CBIR as compared to softmax predictions (mAP 0.184 vs. 0.368 and 0.198 vs. 0.403 respectively). #R##N#Conclusions: Presenting visually similar images based on features from a neural network shows comparable accuracy to the softmax probability-based diagnoses of convolutional neural networks. CBIR may be more helpful than a softmax classifier in improving diagnostic accuracy of clinicians in a routine clinical setting.

Includes members:
  Member "the ham10000 dataset a large collection of multi source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "multiresunet rethinking the u net architecture for multimodal biomedical image segmentation")
  Member "chexnet radiologist level pneumonia detection on chest x rays with deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "an interpretable classifier for high resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization")
  Member "what do we need to build explainable ai systems for the medical domain":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "foundations of explainable knowledge enabled systems")
  Member "attentive explanations justifying decisions and pointing to the evidence":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "chexplain enabling physicians to explore and understanddata driven ai enabled medical imaging analysis")
  Member "skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection a challenge at the 2017 international symposium on biomedical imaging isbi hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration isic":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "multiresunet rethinking the u net architecture for multimodal biomedical image segmentation")
  Member "deep residual learning for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)