human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "non adaptive quantitative group testing using irregular sparse graph codes"):
  Abstract: This paper considers the problem of Quantitative Group Testing (QGT) where there are some defective items among a large population of $N$ items. We consider the scenario in which each item is defective with probability $K/N$, independently from the other items. In the QGT problem, the goal is to identify all or a sufficiently large fraction of the defective items by testing groups of items, with the minimum possible number of tests. In particular, the outcome of each test is a non-negative integer which indicates the number of defective items in the tested group. In this work, we propose a non-adaptive QGT scheme for the underlying randomized model for defective items, which utilizes sparse graph codes over irregular bipartite graphs with optimized degree profiles on the left nodes of the graph as well as binary $t$-error-correcting BCH codes. We show that in the sub-linear regime, i.e., when the ratio $K/N$ vanishes as $N$ grows unbounded, the proposed scheme with ${m=c(t,d)K(t\log (\frac{\ell N}{c(t,d)K}+1)+1)}$ tests can identify all the defective items with probability approaching $1$, where $d$ and $\ell$ are the maximum and average left degree, respectively, and $c(t,d)$ depends only on $t$ and $d$ (and does not depend on $K$ and $N$). For any $t\leq 4$, the testing and recovery algorithms of the proposed scheme have the computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}(N\log \frac{N}{K})$ and $\mathcal{O}(K\log \frac{N}{K})$, respectively. The proposed scheme outperforms two recently proposed non-adaptive QGT schemes for the sub-linear regime, including our scheme based on regular bipartite graphs and the scheme of Gebhard et al., in terms of the number of tests required to identify all defective items with high probability.

Includes members:
  Member "optimal multiclass overfitting by sequence reconstruction from hamming queries":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "quantitative group testing in the sublinear regime":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "group testing with runlength constraints for topological molecular storage")
  Member "sparse graph codes for non adaptive quantitative group testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "quantitative group testing in the sublinear regime")
  Member "a simple and efficient strategy for the coin weighing problem with a spring scale":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "sparse graph codes for non adaptive quantitative group testing")
  Member "decoding from pooled data phase transitions of message passing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "group testing with runlength constraints for topological molecular storage")
  Member "nonadaptive group testing with random set of defectives":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "group testing an information theory perspective")
  Member "optimal nested test plan for combinatorial quantitative group testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "group testing an information theory perspective")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IT(Information Theory)