human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "semantic granularity metric learning for visual search"):
  Abstract: Deep metric learning applied to various applications has shown promising results in identification, retrieval and recognition. Existing methods often do not consider different granularity in visual similarity. However, in many domain applications, images exhibit similarity at multiple granularities with visual semantic concepts, e.g. fashion demonstrates similarity ranging from clothing of the exact same instance to similar looks/design or a common category. Therefore, training image triplets/pairs used for metric learning inherently possess different degree of information. However, the existing methods often treats them with equal importance during training. This hinders capturing the underlying granularities in feature similarity required for effective visual search. #R##N#In view of this, we propose a new deep semantic granularity metric learning (SGML) that develops a novel idea of leveraging attribute semantic space to capture different granularity of similarity, and then integrate this information into deep metric learning. The proposed method simultaneously learns image attributes and embeddings using multitask CNNs. The two tasks are not only jointly optimized but are further linked by the semantic granularity similarity mappings to leverage the correlations between the tasks. To this end, we propose a new soft-binomial deviance loss that effectively integrates the degree of information in training samples, which helps to capture visual similarity at multiple granularities. Compared to recent ensemble-based methods, our framework is conceptually elegant, computationally simple and provides better performance. We perform extensive experiments on benchmark metric learning datasets and demonstrate that our method outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods, e.g., 1-4.5\% improvement in Recall@1 over the previous state-of-the-arts [1],[2] on DeepFashion In-Shop dataset.

Includes members:
  Member "generalization in metric learning should the embedding layer be the embedding layer":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adapting grad cam for embedding networks")
  Member "deep randomized ensembles for metric learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "revisiting training strategies and generalization performance in deep metric learning")
  Member "where and when to look deep siamese attention networks for video based person re identification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "pay attention to the activations a modular attention mechanism for fine grained image recognition")
  Member "deep metric learning with hierarchical triplet loss":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "revisiting training strategies and generalization performance in deep metric learning")
  Member "deep learning based large scale visual recommendation and search for e commerce":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "featurenms non maximum suppression by learning feature embeddings")
  Member "in defense of the triplet loss for person re identification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "stem seg spatio temporal embeddings for instance segmentation in videos")
  Member "local similarity aware deep feature embedding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "informative sample mining network for multi domain image to image translation")
  Member "hard aware deeply cascaded embedding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "a metric learning reality check")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)