human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "length bounded cuts proper interval graphs and structural parameters"):
  Abstract: In the presented paper we study the Length-Bounded Cut problem for special graph classes as well as from a parameterized-complexity viewpoint. Here, we are given a graph $G$, two vertices $s$ and $t$, and positive integers $\beta$ and $\lambda$. The task is to find a set of edges $F$ of size at most $\beta$ such that every $s$-$t$-path of length at most $\lambda$ in $G$ contains some edge in $F$. #R##N#Bazgan et al. conjectured that Length-Bounded Cut admits a polynomial-time algorithm if the input graph $G$ is a~proper interval graph. We confirm this conjecture by showing a dynamic-programming based polynomial-time algorithm. We strengthen the W[1]-hardness result of Dvořak and Knop. Our reduction is shorter, seems simpler to describe, and the target of the reduction has stronger structural properties. Consequently, we give W[1]-hardness for the combined parameter pathwidth and maximum degree of the input graph. Finally, we prove that Length-Bounded Cut is W[1]-hard for the feedback vertex number. Both our hardness results complement known XP algorithms.

Includes members:
  Member "a more fine grained complexity analysis of finding the most vital edges for undirected shortest paths":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on polynomial time combinatorial algorithms for maximum l bounded flow")
  Member "the complexity of finding small separators in temporal graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "multistage s t path confronting similarity with dissimilarity")
  Member "fractals for kernelization lower bounds":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a more fine grained complexity analysis of finding the most vital edges for undirected shortest paths")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)