human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "vizads b analyzing sequences of ads b images using explainable convolutional lstm encoder decoder to detect cyber attacks"):
  Abstract: The purpose of the automatic dependent surveillance broadcast (ADS-B) technology is to serve as a replacement for the current radar-based, air traffic control systems. Despite the considerable time and resources devoted to designing and developing the system, the ADS-B is well known for its lack of security mechanisms. Attempts to address these security vulnerabilities have been made in previous studies by modifying the protocol's current architecture or by using additional hardware components. These solutions, however, are considered impractical because of 1) the complex regulatory process involving avionic systems, 2) the high costs of using hardware components, and 3) the fact that the ADS-B system itself is already deployed in most aircraft and ground stations around the world. In this paper, we propose VizADS-B, an alternative software-based security solution for detecting anomalous ADS-B messages, which does not require any alteration of the current ADS-B architecture or the addition of sensors. According to the proposed method, the information obtained from all aircraft within a specific geographical area is aggregated and represented as a stream of images. Then, a convolutional LSTM encoder-decoder model is used for analyzing and detecting anomalies in the sequences of images. In addition, we propose an explainability technique, designed specifically for convolutional LSTM encoder-decoder models, which is used for providing operative information to the pilot as a visual indicator of a detected anomaly, thus allowing the pilot to make relevant decisions. We evaluated our proposed method on five datasets by injecting and subsequently identifying five different attacks. Our experiments demonstrate that most of the attacks can be detected based on spatio-temporal anomaly detection approach.

Includes members:
  Member "explaining anomalies detected by autoencoders using shap":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "gee a gradient based explainable variational autoencoder for network anomaly detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "latent space conditioning for improved classification and anomaly detection")
  Member "a unified approach to interpreting model predictions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "learning important features through propagating activation differences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "using lstm encoder decoder algorithm for detecting anomalous ads b messages":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "mad gan multivariate anomaly detection for time series data with generative adversarial networks")
  Member "unsupervised learning for physical interaction through video prediction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "transformation based adversarial video prediction on large scale data")
  Member "anomaly detection in video using predictive convolutional long short term memory networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "anomaly detection in road traffic using visual surveillance a survey")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)