human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "reconciling event structures with modern multiprocessors"):
  Abstract: Weakestmo is a recently proposed memory consistency model that uses event structures to resolve the infamous "out-of-thin-air" problem. Although it has been shown to have important benefits over other memory models, its established compilation schemes are suboptimal in that they add more fences than necessary. In this paper, we prove the correctness in Coq of the intended compilation schemes for Weakestmo to a range of hardware memory models (x86, POWER, ARMv7, ARMv8, RISC-V). Our proof is the first that establishes correctness of compilation of an event-structure-based model that forbids "thin-air" behaviors, as well as the first mechanized compilation proof of a weak memory model supporting sequentially consistent accesses to such a range of hardware platforms. Our compilation proof goes via the recent Intermediate Memory Model (IMM), which we suitably extend with sequentially consistent accesses.

Includes members:
  Member "bridging the gap between programming languages and hardware weak memory models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "qed at large a survey of engineering of formally verified software")
  Member "on thin air reads towards an event structures model of relaxed memory":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "pridemm a solver for relaxed memory models")
  Member "operational aspects of c c concurrency":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "verifying c11 programs operationally")
  Member "herding cats modelling simulation testing and data mining for weak memory":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "realitycheck bringing modularity hierarchy and abstraction to automated microarchitectural memory consistency verification")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.PL(Programming Languages)