human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "metamorphic testing for object detection systems"):
  Abstract: Recent advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) have led to object detectors that can rapidly process pictures or videos, and recognize the objects that they contain. Despite the promising progress by industrial manufacturers such as Amazon and Google in commercializing deep learning-based object detection as a standard computer vision service, object detection systems - similar to traditional software - may still produce incorrect results. These errors, in turn, can lead to severe negative outcomes for the users of these object detection systems. For instance, an autonomous driving system that fails to detect pedestrians can cause accidents or even fatalities. However, principled, systematic methods for testing object detection systems do not yet exist, despite their importance. #R##N#To fill this critical gap, we introduce the design and realization of MetaOD, the first metamorphic testing system for object detectors to effectively reveal erroneous detection results by commercial object detectors. To this end, we (1) synthesize natural-looking images by inserting extra object instances into background images, and (2) design metamorphic conditions asserting the equivalence of object detection results between the original and synthetic images after excluding the prediction results on the inserted objects. MetaOD is designed as a streamlined workflow that performs object extraction, selection, and insertion. Evaluated on four commercial object detection services and four pretrained models provided by the TensorFlow API, MetaOD found tens of thousands of detection defects in these object detectors. To further demonstrate the practical usage of MetaOD, we use the synthetic images that cause erroneous detection results to retrain the model. Our results show that the model performance is increased significantly, from an mAP score of 9.3 to an mAP score of 10.5.

Includes members:
  Member "metamorphic testing a new approach for generating next test cases":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "object based metamorphic testing through image structuring")
  Member "adversarial sample detection for deep neural network through model mutation testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reliability validation of learning enabled vehicle tracking")
  Member "yolact real time instance segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "multi task collaborative network for joint referring expression comprehension and segmentation")
  Member "deepgauge comprehensive and multi granularity testing criteria for gauging the robustness of deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "reliability validation of learning enabled vehicle tracking")
  Member "symbolic execution for deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "deep learning for generic object detection a survey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "identifying implementation bugs in machine learning based image classifiers using metamorphic testing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "reliability validation of learning enabled vehicle tracking")
  Member "bdd100k a diverse driving video database with scalable annotation tooling":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)