human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "improving description based person re identification by multi granularity image text alignments"):
  Abstract: Description-based person re-identification (Re-id) is an important task in video surveillance that requires discriminative cross-modal representations to distinguish different people. It is difficult to directly measure the similarity between images and descriptions due to the modality heterogeneity (the cross-modal problem). And all samples belonging to a single category (the fine-grained problem) makes this task even harder than the conventional image-description matching task. In this paper, we propose a Multi-granularity Image-text Alignments (MIA) model to alleviate the cross-modal fine-grained problem for better similarity evaluation in description-based person Re-id. Specifically, three different granularities, i.e., global-global, global-local and local-local alignments are carried out hierarchically. Firstly, the global-global alignment in the Global Contrast (GC) module is for matching the global contexts of images and descriptions. Secondly, the global-local alignment employs the potential relations between local components and global contexts to highlight the distinguishable components while eliminating the uninvolved ones adaptively in the Relation-guided Global-local Alignment (RGA) module. Thirdly, as for the local-local alignment, we match visual human parts with noun phrases in the Bi-directional Fine-grained Matching (BFM) module. The whole network combining multiple granularities can be end-to-end trained without complex pre-processing. To address the difficulties in training the combination of multiple granularities, an effective step training strategy is proposed to train these granularities step-by-step. Extensive experiments and analysis have shown that our method obtains the state-of-the-art performance on the CUHK-PEDES dataset and outperforms the previous methods by a significant margin.

Includes members:
  Member "deep representation learning with part loss for person re identification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "learning shape representations for clothing variations in person re identification")
  Member "stacked cross attention for image text matching":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "pamm pose aware multi shot matching for improving person re identification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "towards better validity dispersion based clustering for unsupervised person re identification")
  Member "person search with natural language description":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "cross modality person re identification with shared specific feature transfer")
  Member "dual path convolutional image text embedding with instance loss":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "adaptive offline quintuplet loss for image text matching")
  Member "convolutional image captioning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "latent normalizing flows for many to many cross domain mappings")
  Member "vse improving visual semantic embeddings with hard negatives":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "adversarial ranking attack and defense")
  Member "learning semantic concepts and order for image and sentence matching":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "mhsan multi head self attention network for visual semantic embedding")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)