human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "off policy evaluation via off policy classification"):
  Abstract: In this work, we consider the problem of model selection for deep reinforcement learning (RL) in real-world environments. Typically, the performance of deep RL algorithms is evaluated via on-policy interactions with the target environment. However, comparing models in a real-world environment for the purposes of early stopping or hyperparameter tuning is costly and often practically infeasible. This leads us to examine off-policy policy evaluation (OPE) in such settings. We focus on OPE for value-based methods, which are of particular interest in deep RL, with applications like robotics, where off-policy algorithms based on Q-function estimation can often attain better sample complexity than direct policy optimization. Existing OPE metrics either rely on a model of the environment, or the use of importance sampling (IS) to correct for the data being off-policy. However, for high-dimensional observations, such as images, models of the environment can be difficult to fit and value-based methods can make IS hard to use or even ill-conditioned, especially when dealing with continuous action spaces. In this paper, we focus on the specific case of MDPs with continuous action spaces and sparse binary rewards, which is representative of many important real-world applications. We propose an alternative metric that relies on neither models nor IS, by framing OPE as a positive-unlabeled (PU) classification problem with the Q-function as the decision function. We experimentally show that this metric outperforms baselines on a number of tasks. Most importantly, it can reliably predict the relative performance of different policies in a number of generalization scenarios, including the transfer to the real-world of policies trained in simulation for an image-based robotic manipulation task.

Includes members:
  Member "qt opt scalable deep reinforcement learning for vision based robotic manipulation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")
  Member "deep reinforcement learning for vision based robotic grasping a simulated comparative evaluation of off policy methods":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "acceleration of actor critic deep reinforcement learning for visual grasping in clutter by state representation learning based on disentanglement of a raw input image")
  Member "stochastic adversarial video prediction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "transformation based adversarial video prediction on large scale data")
  Member "representation balancing mdps for off policy policy evaluation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "safe counterfactual reinforcement learning")
  Member "quantifying generalization in reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "sim to real via sim to sim data efficient robotic grasping via randomized to canonical adaptation networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adapting object detectors with conditional domain normalization")
  Member "rudder return decomposition for delayed rewards":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "challenges of real world reinforcement learning")
  Member "gotta learn fast a new benchmark for generalization in rl":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)