human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "sharpdarts faster and more accurate differentiable architecture search"):
  Abstract: Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has been a source of dramatic improvements in neural network design, with recent results meeting or exceeding the performance of hand-tuned architectures. However, our understanding of how to represent the search space for neural net architectures and how to search that space efficiently are both still in their infancy. #R##N#We have performed an in-depth analysis to identify limitations in a widely used search space and a recent architecture search method, Differentiable Architecture Search (DARTS). These findings led us to introduce novel network blocks with a more general, balanced, and consistent design; a better-optimized Cosine Power Annealing learning rate schedule; and other improvements. Our resulting sharpDARTS search is 50% faster with a 20-30% relative improvement in final model error on CIFAR-10 when compared to DARTS. Our best single model run has 1.93% (1.98+/-0.07) validation error on CIFAR-10 and 5.5% error (5.8+/-0.3) on the recently released CIFAR-10.1 test set. To our knowledge, both are state of the art for models of similar size. This model also generalizes competitively to ImageNet at 25.1% top-1 (7.8% top-5) error. #R##N#We found improvements for existing search spaces but does DARTS generalize to new domains? We propose Differentiable Hyperparameter Grid Search and the HyperCuboid search space, which are representations designed to leverage DARTS for more general parameter optimization. Here we find that DARTS fails to generalize when compared against a human's one shot choice of models. We look back to the DARTS and sharpDARTS search spaces to understand why, and an ablation study reveals an unusual generalization gap. We finally propose Max-W regularization to solve this problem, which proves significantly better than the handmade design. Code will be made available.

Includes members:
  Member "mobilenetv2 inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "regularized evolution for image classifier architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "searching for winograd aware quantized networks")
  Member "do cifar 10 classifiers generalize to cifar 10":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")
  Member "proxylessnas direct neural architecture search on target task and hardware":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "gan compression efficient architectures for interactive conditional gans")
  Member "autoaugment learning augmentation policies from data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "intelligence physics and information the tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity in machine learning")
  Member "gpipe efficient training of giant neural networks using pipeline parallelism":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a large scale study of representation learning with the visual task adaptation benchmark")
  Member "darts differentiable architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "gan compression efficient architectures for interactive conditional gans")
  Member "the costar block stacking dataset learning with workspace constraints":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "good robot efficient reinforcement learning for multi step visual tasks with sim to real transfer")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)