human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "beyond trace reconstruction population recovery from the deletion channel"):
  Abstract: \emph{Population recovery} is the problem of learning an unknown distribution over an unknown set of $n$-bit strings, given access to independent draws from the distribution that have been independently corrupted according to some noise channel. Recent work has intensively studied such problems both for the bit-flip and erasure noise channels. #R##N#We initiate the study of population recovery under the \emph{deletion channel}, in which each bit is independently \emph{deleted} with some fixed probability and the surviving bits are concatenated and transmitted. This is a far more challenging noise model than bit-flip~noise or erasure noise; indeed, even the simplest case in which the population size is 1 (corresponding to a trivial distribution supported on a single string) corresponds to the \emph{trace reconstruction} problem, a challenging problem that has received much recent attention (see e.g.~\cite{DOS17,NP17,PZ17,HPP18,HHP18}). #R##N#We give algorithms and lower bounds for population recovery under the deletion channel when the population size is some $\ell>1$. As our main sample complexity upper bound, we show that for any $\ell=o(\log n/\log \log n)$, a population of $\ell$ strings from $\{0,1\}^n$ can be learned under deletion channel noise using $\smash{2^{n^{1/2+o(1)}}}$ samples. On the lower bound side, we show that $n^{\Omega(\ell)}$ samples are required to perform population recovery under the deletion channel, for all $\ell \leq n^{1/2-\epsilon}$. #R##N#Our upper bounds are obtained via a robust multivariate generalization of a polynomial-based analysis, due to Krasikov and Roddity \cite{KR97}, of how the $k$-deck of a bit-string uniquely identifies the string; this is a very different approach from recent algorithms for trace reconstruction (the $\ell=1$ case). Our lower bounds build on moment-matching results of Roos~\cite{Roo00} and Daskalakis and Papadimitriou~\cite{DP15}.

Includes members:
  Member "sharp bounds for population recovery":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "efficient average case population recovery in the presence of insertions and deletions")
  Member "average case reconstruction for the deletion channel subpolynomially many traces suffice":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "the error probability of maximum likelihood decoding over two deletion channels")
  Member "noisy population recovery in polynomial time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "efficient average case population recovery in the presence of insertions and deletions")
  Member "optimal mean based algorithms for trace reconstruction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the error probability of maximum likelihood decoding over two deletion channels")
  Member "a polynomial time algorithm for lossy population recovery":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "efficient average case population recovery in the presence of insertions and deletions")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)