human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "ablation studies in artificial neural networks"):
  Abstract: Ablation studies have been widely used in the field of neuroscience to tackle complex biological systems such as the extensively studied Drosophila central nervous system, the vertebrate brain and more interestingly and most delicately, the human brain. In the past, these kinds of studies were utilized to uncover structure and organization in the brain, i.e. a mapping of features inherent to external stimuli onto different areas of the neocortex. considering the growth in size and complexity of state-of-the-art artificial neural networks (ANNs) and the corresponding growth in complexity of the tasks that are tackled by these networks, the question arises whether ablation studies may be used to investigate these networks for a similar organization of their inner representations. In this paper, we address this question and performed two ablation studies in two fundamentally different ANNs to investigate their inner representations of two well-known benchmark datasets from the computer vision domain. We found that features distinct to the local and global structure of the data are selectively represented in specific parts of the network. Furthermore, some of these representations are redundant, awarding the network a certain robustness to structural damages. We further determined the importance of specific parts of the network for the classification task solely based on the weight structure of single units. Finally, we examined the ability of damaged networks to recover from the consequences of ablations by means of recovery training. We argue that ablations studies are a feasible method to investigate knowledge representations in ANNs and are especially helpful to examine a networks robustness to structural damages, a feature of ANNs that will become increasingly important for future safety-critical applications.

Includes members:
  Member "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "faster gaze prediction with dense networks and fisher pruning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards efficient model compression via learned global ranking")
  Member "impala scalable distributed deep rl with importance weighted actor learner architectures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "explore discover and learn unsupervised discovery of state covering skills")
  Member "learning dexterous in hand manipulation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "never give up learning directed exploration strategies")
  Member "speaker independent speech separation with deep attractor network":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "supervised speaker embedding de mixing in two speaker environment")
  Member "observe and look further achieving consistent performance on atari":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "scaling data driven robotics with reward sketching and batch reinforcement learning")
  Member "rainbow combining improvements in deep reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "challenges and countermeasures for adversarial attacks on deep reinforcement learning")
  Member "network dissection quantifying interpretability of deep visual representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "grad cam visual explanations from deep networks via gradient based localization")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing)