human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "disentangling trainability and generalization in deep learning"):
  Abstract: A fundamental goal in deep learning is the characterization of trainability and generalization of neural networks as a function of their architecture and hyperparameters. In this paper, we discuss these challenging issues in the context of wide neural networks at large depths where we will see that the situation simplifies considerably. To do this, we leverage recent advances that have separately shown: (1) that in the wide network limit, random networks before training are Gaussian Processes governed by a kernel known as the Neural Network Gaussian Process (NNGP) kernel, (2) that at large depths the spectrum of the NNGP kernel simplifies considerably and becomes "weakly data-dependent" and (3) that gradient descent training of wide neural networks is described by a kernel called the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) that is related to the NNGP. Here we show that in the large depth limit the spectrum of the NTK simplifies in much the same way as that of the NNGP kernel. By analyzing this spectrum, we arrive at a precise characterization of trainability and a necessary condition for generalization across a range of architectures including Fully Connected Networks (FCNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). In particular, we find that there are large regions of hyperparameter space where networks can only memorize the training set in the sense they reach perfect training accuracy but completely fail to generalize outside the training set, in contrast with several recent results. By comparing CNNs with- and without-global average pooling, we show that CNNs without average pooling have very nearly identical learning dynamics to FCNs while CNNs with pooling contain a correction that alters its generalization performance. We perform a thorough empirical investigation of these theoretical results and finding excellent agreement on real datasets.

Includes members:
  Member "dynamics of deep neural networks and neural tangent hierarchy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "freeze and chaos for dnns an ntk view of batch normalization checkerboard and boundary effects":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "batch normalization biases deep residual networks towards shallow paths")
  Member "scaling limits of wide neural networks with weight sharing gaussian process behavior gradient independence and neural tangent kernel derivation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "a mean field theory of batch normalization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "batch normalization biases deep residual networks towards shallow paths")
  Member "finite depth and width corrections to the neural tangent kernel":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "dynamical isometry and a mean field theory of lstms and grus":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "provable benefit of orthogonal initialization in optimizing deep linear networks")
  Member "on exact computation with an infinitely wide neural net":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "transfusion understanding transfer learning for medical imaging":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "improving the adversarial robustness of transfer learning via noisy feature distillation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)