human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "publication modalities article in press and open access in relation to journal average citation"):
  Abstract: There has been a generalization in the use of two publication practices by scientific journals during the past decade: (1) ‘article in press’ or early view, which allows access to the accepted paper before its formal publication in an issue; (2) ‘open access’, which allows readers to obtain it freely and free of charge. This paper studies the influence of both publication modalities on the average impact of the journal and its evolution over time. It tries to identify the separate effect of access on citation into two major parts: early view and selection effect, managing to provide some evidence of the positive effect of both. Scopus is used as the database and CiteScore as the measure of journal impact. The prevalence of both publication modalities is quantified. Differences in the average impact factor of group of journals, according to their publication modalities, are tested. The evolution over time of the citation influence, from 2011 to 2016, is also analysed. Finally, a linear regression to explain the correlation of these publication practices with the CiteScore in 2016, in a ceteris paribus context, is estimated. Our main findings show evidence of a positive correlation between average journal impact and advancing the publication of accepted articles, moreover this correlation increases over time. The open access modality, in a ceteris paribus context, also correlates positively with average journal impact.

Includes members:
  Member "prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the scopus database":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "influencia de la fecha de publicacion online de los articulos cientificos en los indicadores bibliometricos":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "can microsoft academic assess the early citation impact of in press articles a multi discipline exploratory analysis")
  Member "reconsidering the gold open access citation advantage postulate in a multidisciplinary context an analysis of the subject categories in the web of science database 2009 2014":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the scopus database")
  Member "the open access advantage considering citation article usage and social media attention":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "the relationship between usage and citations in an open access mega journal")
  Member "an approach to the author citation potential measures of scientific performance which are invariant across scientific fields":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the scopus database")
  Member "comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a jcr subject categories normalized impact factor":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the citation advantage of foreign language references for chinese social science papers")
  Member "self selected or mandated open access increases citation impact for higher quality research":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the citation advantage of linking publications to research data")
  Member "the effect of use and access on citations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "prevalence and citation advantage of gold open access in the subject areas of the scopus database")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DL(Digital Libraries)