human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "fairness sample complexity and the case for human intervention"):
  Abstract: With the aim of building machine learning systems that incorporate standards of fairness and accountability, we explore explicit subgroup sample complexity bounds. The work is motivated by the observation that classifier predictions for real world datasets often demonstrate drastically different metrics, such as accuracy, when subdivided by specific sensitive variable subgroups. The reasons for these discrepancies are varied and not limited to the influence of mitigating variables, institutional bias, underlying population distributions as well as sampling bias. Among the numerous definitions of fairness that exist, we argue that at a minimum, principled ML practices should ensure that classification predictions are able to mirror the underlying sub-population distributions. However, as the number of sensitive variables increase, populations meeting at the intersectionality of these variables may simply not exist or may not be large enough to provide accurate samples for classification. In these increasingly likely scenarios, we make the case for human intervention and applying situational and individual definitions of fairness. In this paper we present lower bounds of subgroup sample complexity for metric-fair learning based on the theory of Probably Approximately Metric Fair Learning. We demonstrate that for a classifier to approach a definition of fairness in terms of specific sensitive variables, adequate subgroup population samples need to exist and the model dimensionality has to be aligned with subgroup population distributions. In cases where this is not feasible, we propose an approach using individual fairness definitions for achieving alignment. We look at two commonly explored UCI datasets under this lens and suggest human interventions for data collection for specific subgroups to achieve approximate individual fairness for linear hypotheses.

Includes members:
  Member "towards understanding the role of over parametrization in generalization of neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "the implicit and explicit regularization effects of dropout")
  Member "simplicity creates inequity implications for fairness stereotypes and interpretability":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a resolution in algorithmic fairness calibrated scores for fair classifications")
  Member "fairness under composition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "preventing fairness gerrymandering auditing and learning for subgroup fairness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "to split or not to split the impact of disparate treatment in classification")
  Member "runaway feedback loops in predictive policing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")
  Member "fairness through awareness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "algorithmic fairness")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)