human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "slices of attention in asynchronous video job interviews"):
  Abstract: The impact of non verbal behaviour in a hiring decision remains an open question. Investigating this question is important, as it could provide a better understanding on how to train candidates for job interviews and make recruiters be aware of influential non verbal behaviour. This research has recently been accelerated due to the development of tools for the automatic analysis of social signals, and the emergence of machine learning methods. However, these studies are still mainly based on hand engineered features, which imposes a limit to the discovery of influential social signals. On the other side, deep learning methods are a promising tool to discover complex patterns without the necessity of feature engineering. In this paper, we focus on studying influential non verbal social signals in asynchronous job video interviews that are discovered by deep learning methods. We use a previously published deep learning system that aims at inferring the hirability of a candidate with regard to a sequence of interview questions. One particularity of this system is the use of attention mechanisms, which aim at identifying the relevant parts of an answer. Thus, information at a fine-grained temporal level could be extracted using global (at the interview level) annotations on hirability. While most of the deep learning systems use attention mechanisms to offer a quick visualization of slices when a rise of attention occurs, we perform an in-depth analysis to understand what happens during these moments. First, we propose a methodology to automatically extract slices where there is a rise of attention (attention slices). Second, we study the content of attention slices by comparing them with randomly sampled slices. Finally, we show that they bear significantly more information for hirability than randomly sampled slices.

Includes members:
  Member "attention is not explanation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "counterfactual samples synthesizing for robust visual question answering")
  Member "hirenet a hierarchical attention model for the automatic analysis of asynchronous video job interviews":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning occupational task shares dynamics for the future of work")
  Member "improving the interpretability of deep neural networks with knowledge distillation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "xcos an explainable cosine metric for face verification task")
  Member "learn to pay attention":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "see more know more unsupervised video object segmentation with co attention siamese networks")
  Member "interpretable learning for self driving cars by visualizing causal attention":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "interpretable end to end urban autonomous driving with latent deep reinforcement learning")
  Member "axiomatic attribution for deep networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "adversarial attacks and defenses on graphs a review and empirical study")
  Member "from softmax to sparsemax a sparse model of attention and multi label classification":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "power bert accelerating bert inference for classification tasks")
  Member "why should i trust you explaining the predictions of any classifier":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)