human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on locally decodable codes in resource bounded channels"):
  Abstract: Constructions of locally decodable codes (LDCs) have one of two undesirable properties: low rate or high locality (polynomial in the length of the message). In settings where the encoder/decoder have already exchanged cryptographic keys and the channel is a probabilistic polynomial time (PPT) algorithm, it is possible to circumvent these barriers and design LDCs with constant rate and small locality. However, the assumption that the encoder/decoder have exchanged cryptographic keys is often prohibitive. We thus consider the problem of designing explicit and efficient LDCs in settings where the channel is slightly more constrained than the encoder/decoder with respect to some resource e.g., space or (sequential) time. Given an explicit function $f$ that the channel cannot compute, we show how the encoder can transmit a random secret key to the local decoder using $f(\cdot)$ and a random oracle $H(\cdot)$. This allows bootstrap from the private key LDC construction of Ostrovsky, Pandey and Sahai (ICALP, 2007), thereby answering an open question posed by Guruswami and Smith (FOCS 2010) of whether such bootstrapping techniques may apply to LDCs in weaker channel models than just PPT algorithms. Specifically, in the random oracle model we show how to construct explicit constant rate LDCs with optimal locality of polylog in the security parameter against various resource constrained channels.

Includes members:
  Member "relaxed locally correctable codes in computationally bounded channels":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a lower bound for relaxed locally decodable codes")
  Member "sustained space complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "approximating cumulative pebbling cost is unique games hard")
  Member "high rate locally correctable and locally testable codes with sub polynomial query complexity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "complexity theory game theory and economics the barbados lectures")
  Member "optimal rate code constructions for computationally simple channels":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "locally decodable codes with randomized encoding")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)