human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "double spend counterattacks threat of retaliation in proof of work systems"):
  Abstract: Proof-of-Work mining is intended to provide blockchains with robustness against double-spend attacks. However, an economic analysis that follows from Budish (2018), which considers free entry conditions together with the ability to rent sufficient hashrate to conduct an attack, suggests that the resulting block rewards can make an attack cheap. We formalize a defense to double-spend attacks. We show that when the victim can counterattack in the same way as the attacker, this leads to a variation on the classic game-theoretic War of Attrition model. The threat of this kind of counterattack induces a subgame perfect equilibrium in which no attack occurs in the first place.

Includes members:
  Member "oceanic games centralization risks and incentives in blockchain mining":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "presto a systematic framework for blockchain consensus protocols")
  Member "mind the mining":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "pricing asics for cryptocurrency mining")
  Member "bitcoin a natural oligopoly":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "pricing asics for cryptocurrency mining")
  Member "optimal selfish mining strategies in bitcoin":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "incentive analysis of bitcoin ng revisited")
  Member "analysis of hashrate based double spending":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "joint time scheduling and transaction fee selection in blockchain based rf powered backscatter cognitive radio network")
  Member "majority is not enough bitcoin mining is vulnerable":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "on the convergence of artificial intelligence and distributed ledger technology a scoping review and future research agenda")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)