human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "use net incorporating squeeze and excitation blocks into u net for prostate zonal segmentation of multi institutional mri datasets"):
  Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most common malignant tumors in men but prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) analysis remains challenging. Besides whole prostate gland segmentation, the capability to differentiate between the blurry boundary of the Central Gland (CG) and Peripheral Zone (PZ) can lead to differential diagnosis, since tumor's frequency and severity differ in these regions. To tackle the prostate zonal segmentation task, we propose a novel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), called USE-Net, which incorporates Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks into U-Net. Especially, the SE blocks are added after every Encoder (Enc USE-Net) or Encoder-Decoder block (Enc-Dec USE-Net). This study evaluates the generalization ability of CNN-based architectures on three T2-weighted MRI datasets, each one consisting of a different number of patients and heterogeneous image characteristics, collected by different institutions. The following mixed scheme is used for training/testing: (i) training on either each individual dataset or multiple prostate MRI datasets and (ii) testing on all three datasets with all possible training/testing combinations. USE-Net is compared against three state-of-the-art CNN-based architectures (i.e., U-Net, pix2pix, and Mixed-Scale Dense Network), along with a semi-automatic continuous max-flow model. The results show that training on the union of the datasets generally outperforms training on each dataset separately, allowing for both intra-/cross-dataset generalization. Enc USE-Net shows good overall generalization under any training condition, while Enc-Dec USE-Net remarkably outperforms the other methods when trained on all datasets. These findings reveal that the SE blocks' adaptive feature recalibration provides excellent cross-dataset generalization when testing is performed on samples of the datasets used during training.

Includes members:
  Member "cnn based prostate zonal segmentation on t2 weighted mr images a cross dataset study":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "attention gated networks learning to leverage salient regions in medical images":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "an interpretable classifier for high resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization")
  Member "brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "squeeze and excitation networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning enriched features for real image restoration and enhancement")
  Member "a survey on deep learning in medical image analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "medgan medical image translation using gans")
  Member "efficient multi scale 3d cnn with fully connected crf for accurate brain lesion segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "medgan medical image translation using gans")
  Member "deepcut object segmentation from bounding box annotations using convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "model based and data driven strategies in medical image computing")
  Member "image to image translation with conditional adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "generative adversarial networks in computer vision a survey and taxonomy")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)