human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "towards optimal moment estimation in streaming and distributed models"):
  Abstract: One of the oldest problems in the data stream model is to approximate the $p$-th moment $\|\mathcal{X}\|_p^p = \sum_{i=1}^n |\mathcal{X}_i|^p$ of an underlying vector $\mathcal{X} \in \mathbb{R}^n$, which is presented as a sequence of poly$(n)$ updates to its coordinates. Of particular interest is when $p \in (0,2]$. Although a tight space bound of $\Theta(\epsilon^{-2} \log n)$ bits is known for this problem when both positive and negative updates are allowed, surprisingly there is still a gap in the space complexity when all updates are positive. Specifically, the upper bound is $O(\epsilon^{-2} \log n)$ bits, while the lower bound is only $\Omega(\epsilon^{-2} + \log n)$ bits. Recently, an upper bound of $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-2} + \log n)$ bits was obtained assuming that the updates arrive in a random order. #R##N#We show that for $p \in (0, 1]$, the random order assumption is not needed. Namely, we give an upper bound for worst-case streams of $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-2} + \log n)$ bits for estimating $\|\mathcal{X}\|_p^p$. Our techniques also give new upper bounds for estimating the empirical entropy in a stream. On the other hand, we show that for $p \in (1,2]$, in the natural coordinator and blackboard communication topologies, there is an $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ bit max-communication upper bound based on a randomized rounding scheme. Our protocols also give rise to protocols for heavy hitters and approximate matrix product. We generalize our results to arbitrary communication topologies $G$, obtaining an $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{2} \log d)$ max-communication upper bound, where $d$ is the diameter of $G$. Interestingly, our upper bound rules out natural communication complexity-based approaches for proving an $\Omega(\epsilon^{-2} \log n)$ bit lower bound for $p \in (1,2]$ for streaming algorithms. In particular, any such lower bound must come from a topology with large diameter.

Includes members:
  Member "optimal random sampling from distributed streams revisited":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "communication efficient weighted reservoir sampling from fully distributed data streams")
  Member "weighted reservoir sampling from distributed streams":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "communication efficient weighted reservoir sampling from fully distributed data streams")
  Member "turning big data into tiny data constant size coresets for k means pca and projective clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "fair clustering with multiple colors")
  Member "distributed statistical estimation of matrix products with applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the communication complexity of optimization")
  Member "revisiting frequency moment estimation in random order streams":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sketching transformed matrices with applications to natural language processing")
  Member "optimal lower bounds for universal relation and for samplers and finding duplicates in streams":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "dynamic streaming spectral sparsification in nearly linear time and space")
  Member "continuous monitoring of ell_p norms in data streams":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "nearly optimal distinct elements and heavy hitters on sliding windows")
  Member "communication optimal distributed clustering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "the communication complexity of optimization")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)