human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "f3net fusion feedback and focus for salient object detection"):
  Abstract: Most of existing salient object detection models have achieved great progress by aggregating multi-level features extracted from convolutional neural networks. However, because of the different receptive fields of different convolutional layers, there exists big differences between features generated by these layers. Common feature fusion strategies (addition or concatenation) ignore these differences and may cause suboptimal solutions. In this paper, we propose the F3Net to solve above problem, which mainly consists of cross feature module (CFM) and cascaded feedback decoder (CFD) trained by minimizing a new pixel position aware loss (PPA). Specifically, CFM aims to selectively aggregate multi-level features. Different from addition and concatenation, CFM adaptively selects complementary components from input features before fusion, which can effectively avoid introducing too much redundant information that may destroy the original features. Besides, CFD adopts a multi-stage feedback mechanism, where features closed to supervision will be introduced to the output of previous layers to supplement them and eliminate the differences between features. These refined features will go through multiple similar iterations before generating the final saliency maps. Furthermore, different from binary cross entropy, the proposed PPA loss doesn't treat pixels equally, which can synthesize the local structure information of a pixel to guide the network to focus more on local details. Hard pixels from boundaries or error-prone parts will be given more attention to emphasize their importance. F3Net is able to segment salient object regions accurately and provide clear local details. Comprehensive experiments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that F3Net outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on six evaluation metrics.

Includes members:
  Member "salient object detection in the deep learning era an in depth survey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "spatiotemporal knowledge distillation for efficient estimation of aerial video saliency")
  Member "pyramid feature attention network for saliency detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "weakly supervised salient object detection via scribble annotations")
  Member "a simple pooling based design for real time salient object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "highly efficient salient object detection with 100k parameters")
  Member "cascaded partial decoder for fast and accurate salient object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "highly efficient salient object detection with 100k parameters")
  Member "deeply supervised salient object detection with short connections":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "highly efficient salient object detection with 100k parameters")
  Member "reverse attention for salient object detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "highly efficient salient object detection with 100k parameters")
  Member "enhanced alignment measure for binary foreground map evaluation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "weakly supervised salient object detection via scribble annotations")
  Member "structure measure a new way to evaluate foreground maps":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "adaptive graph convolutional network with attention graph clustering for co saliency detection")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)