human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "towards fair and decentralized privacy preserving deep learning with blockchain"):
  Abstract: In collaborative deep learning, current learning frameworks follow either a centralized architecture or a distributed architecture. Whilst centralized architecture deploys a central server to train a global model over the massive amount of joint data from all parties, distributed architecture aggregates parameter updates from participating parties' local model training, via a parameter server. These two server-based architectures present security and robustness vulnerabilities such as single-point-of-failure, single-point-of-breach, privacy leakage, and lack of fairness. To address these problems, we design, implement, and evaluate a purely decentralized privacy-preserving deep learning framework, called DPPDL. DPPDL makes the first investigation on the research problem of fairness in collaborative deep learning, and simultaneously provides fairness and privacy by proposing two novel algorithms: initial benchmarking and privacy-preserving collaborative deep learning. During initial benchmarking, each party trains a local Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Network (DPGAN) and publishes the generated privacy-preserving artificial samples for other parties to label, based on the quality of which to initialize local credibility list for other parties. The local credibility list reflects how much one party contributes to another party, and it is used and updated during collaborative learning to ensure fairness. To protect gradients transaction during privacy-preserving collaborative deep learning, we further put forward a three-layer onion-style encryption scheme. We experimentally demonstrate, on benchmark image datasets, that accuracy, privacy and fairness in collaborative deep learning can be effectively addressed at the same time by our proposed DPPDL framework. Moreover, DPPDL provides a viable solution to detect and isolate the cheating party in the system.

Includes members:
  Member "differentially private releasing via deep generative model technical report":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adaclip adaptive clipping for private sgd")
  Member "modelchain decentralized privacy preserving healthcare predictive modeling framework on private blockchain networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "towards fair and decentralized privacy preserving deep learning")
  Member "dimensionality driven learning with noisy labels":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "dividemix learning with noisy labels as semi supervised learning")
  Member "iterative learning with open set noisy labels":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "dividemix learning with noisy labels as semi supervised learning")
  Member "differentially private fair learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "removing disparate impact of differentially private stochastic gradient descent on model accuracy")
  Member "deep models under the gan information leakage from collaborative deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "trends and advancements in deep neural network communication")
  Member "communication efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "secure and robust machine learning for healthcare a survey")
  Member "crypto nets neural networks over encrypted data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "privacy preserving deep visual recognition an adversarial learning framework and a new dataset")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)