human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "ekt exercise aware knowledge tracing for student performance prediction"):
  Abstract: For offering proactive services to students in intelligent education, one of the fundamental tasks is predicting their performance (e.g., scores) on future exercises, where it is necessary to track each student's knowledge acquisition during her exercising activities. However, existing approaches can only exploit the exercising records of students, and the problem of extracting rich information existed in the exercise's materials (e.g., knowledge concepts, exercise content) to achieve both precise predictions of student performance and interpretable analysis of knowledge acquisition remains underexplored. In this paper, we present a holistic study of student performance prediction. To directly achieve the primary goal of prediction, we first propose a general Exercise-Enhanced Recurrent Neural Network (EERNN) framework by exploring both student's records and the exercise contents. In EERNN, we simply summarize each student's state into an integrated vector and trace it with a recurrent neural network, where we design a bidirectional LSTM to learn the encoding of each exercise's content. For making predictions, we propose two implementations under EERNN with different strategies, i.e., EERNNM with Markov property and EERNNA with Attention mechanism. Then, to explicitly track student's knowledge acquisition on multiple knowledge concepts, we extend EERNN to an explainable Exercise-aware Knowledge Tracing (EKT) by incorporating the knowledge concept effects, where the student's integrated state vector is extended to a knowledge state matrix. In EKT, we further develop a memory network for quantifying how much each exercise can affect the mastery of students on concepts during the exercising process. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on large-scale real-world data. The results demonstrate the prediction effectiveness of two frameworks as well as the superior interpretability of EKT.

Includes members:
  Member "transcribing content from structural images with spotlight mechanism":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "neural cognitive diagnosis for intelligent education systems")
  Member "stable prediction across unknown environments":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "stable prediction with model misspecification and agnostic distribution shift")
  Member "a survey on network embedding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning to segment 3d point clouds in 2d image space")
  Member "multi behavioral sequential prediction with recurrent log bilinear model":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "deep learning for sequential recommendation algorithms influential factors and evaluations")
  Member "dynamic memory networks for visual and textual question answering":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "component analysis for visual question answering architectures")
  Member "dynamic key value memory networks for knowledge tracing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "what changed your mind the roles of dynamic topics and discourse in argumentation process")
  Member "end to end memory networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "learning video object segmentation from unlabeled videos")
  Member "lstm based deep learning models for non factoid answer selection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "multi level head wise match and aggregation in transformer for textual sequence matching")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CY(Computers and Society)