human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on many to many mapping between concordance correlation coefficient and mean square error"):
  Abstract: The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) is one of the most widely used reproducibility indices, introduced by Lin in 1989. In addition to its extensive use in assay validation, CCC serves various different purposes in other multivariate population-related tasks. For example, it is often used as a metric to quantify an inter-rater agreement. It is also often used as a performance metric for prediction problems. In terms of the cost function, however, there has been hardly any attempt to design one to train the predictive deep learning models. In this paper, we present a family of lightweight cost functions that aim to also maximise CCC, when minimising the prediction errors. To this end, we first reformulate CCC in terms of the errors in the prediction; and then as a logical next step, in terms of the sequence of the fixed set of errors. To elucidate our motivation and the results we obtain through these error rearrangements, the data we use is the set of gold standard annotations from a well-known database called `Automatic Sentiment Analysis in the Wild' (SEWA), popular thanks to its use in the latest Audio/Visual Emotion Challenges (\textsc{AVEC'17} and \textsc{AVEC'18}). We also present some new and interesting mathematical paradoxes we have discovered through this CCC reformulation endeavour.

Includes members:
  Member "sewa db a rich database for audio visual emotion and sentiment research in the wild":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "adversarial based neural networks for affect estimations in the wild")
  Member "xgboost a scalable tree boosting system":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "monotonic cardinality estimation of similarity selection a deep learning approach")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)