human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "how compact assessing compactness of representations through layer wise pruning"):
  Abstract: Various forms of representations may arise in the many layers embedded in deep neural networks (DNNs). Of these, where can we find the most compact representation? We propose to use a pruning framework to answer this question: How compact can each layer be compressed, without losing performance? Most of the existing DNN compression methods do not consider the relative compressibility of the individual layers. They uniformly apply a single target sparsity to all layers or adapt layer sparsity using heuristics and additional training. We propose a principled method that automatically determines the sparsity of individual layers derived from the importance of each layer. To do this, we consider a metric to measure the importance of each layer based on the layer-wise capacity. Given the trained model and the total target sparsity, we first evaluate the importance of each layer from the model. From the evaluated importance, we compute the layer-wise sparsity of each layer. The proposed method can be applied to any DNN architecture and can be combined with any pruning method that takes the total target sparsity as a parameter. To validate the proposed method, we carried out an image classification task with two types of DNN architectures on two benchmark datasets and used three pruning methods for compression. In case of VGG-16 model with weight pruning on the ImageNet dataset, we achieved up to 75% (17.5% on average) better top-5 accuracy than the baseline under the same total target sparsity. Furthermore, we analyzed where the maximum compression can occur in the network. This kind of analysis can help us identify the most compact representation within a deep neural network.

Includes members:
  Member "rethinking the smaller norm less informative assumption in channel pruning of convolution layers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards efficient model compression via learned global ranking")
  Member "building efficient convnets using redundant feature pruning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "on correlation of features extracted by deep neural networks")
  Member "stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "learning efficient convolutional networks through network slimming":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "mask r cnn":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "channel pruning for accelerating very deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "yolo9000 better faster stronger":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "object detection in optical remote sensing images a survey and a new benchmark")
  Member "pruning convolutional neural networks for resource efficient inference":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)