human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "scalable nonlinear planning with deep neural network learned transition models"):
  Abstract: In many real-world planning problems with factored, mixed discrete and continuous state and action spaces such as Reservoir Control, Heating Ventilation, and Air Conditioning, and Navigation domains, it is difficult to obtain a model of the complex nonlinear dynamics that govern state evolution. However, the ubiquity of modern sensors allows us to collect large quantities of data from each of these complex systems and build accurate, nonlinear deep neural network models of their state transitions. But there remains one major problem for the task of control -- how can we plan with deep network learned transition models without resorting to Monte Carlo Tree Search and other black-box transition model techniques that ignore model structure and do not easily extend to mixed discrete and continuous domains? In this paper, we introduce two types of nonlinear planning methods that can leverage deep neural network learned transition models: Hybrid Deep MILP Planner (HD-MILP-Plan) and Tensorflow Planner (TF-Plan). In HD-MILP-Plan, we make the critical observation that the Rectified Linear Unit transfer function for deep networks not only allows faster convergence of model learning, but also permits a direct compilation of the deep network transition model to a Mixed-Integer Linear Program encoding. Further, we identify deep network specific optimizations for HD-MILP-Plan that improve performance over a base encoding and show that we can plan optimally with respect to the learned deep networks. In TF-Plan, we take advantage of the efficiency of auto-differentiation tools and GPU-based computation where we encode a subclass of purely continuous planning problems as Recurrent Neural Networks and directly optimize the actions through backpropagation. We compare both planners and show that TF-Plan is able to approximate the optimal plans found by HD-MILP-Plan in less computation time...

Includes members:
  Member "compact and efficient encodings for planning in factored state and action spaces with learned binarized neural network transition models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "reward potentials for planning with learned neural network transition models")
  Member "scalable planning with tensorflow for hybrid nonlinear domains":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "synthesizing action sequences for modifying model decisions")
  Member "understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "densely connected convolutional networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "lossless compression of deep neural networks")
  Member "a hybrid lp rpg heuristic for modelling numeric resource flows in planning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "ffrob leveraging symbolic planning for efficient task and motion planning")
  Member "playing atari with deep reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "review analyze and design a comprehensive deep reinforcement learning framework")
  Member "do deep nets really need to be deep":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "distilled hierarchical neural ensembles with adaptive inference cost")
  Member "solving factored mdps with hybrid state and action variables":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "hybrid planning for dynamic multimodal stochastic shortest paths")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence)