human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "intriguing properties of adversarial ml attacks in the problem space"):
  Abstract: Recent research efforts on adversarial ML have investigated problem-space attacks, focusing on the generation of real evasive objects in domains where, unlike images, there is no clear inverse mapping to the feature space (e.g., software). However, the design, comparison, and real-world implications of problem-space attacks remain underexplored. This paper makes two major contributions. First, we propose a novel formalization for adversarial ML evasion attacks in the problem-space, which includes the definition of a comprehensive set of constraints on available transformations, preserved semantics, robustness to preprocessing, and plausibility. We shed light on the relationship between feature space and problem space, and we introduce the concept of side-effect features as the byproduct of the inverse feature-mapping problem. This enables us to define and prove necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of problem-space attacks. We further demonstrate the expressive power of our formalization by using it to describe several attacks from related literature across different domains. Second, building on our formalization, we propose a novel problem-space attack on Android malware that overcomes past limitations. Experiments on a dataset with 170K Android apps from 2017 and 2018 show the practical feasibility of evading a state-of-the-art malware classifier along with its hardened version. Our results demonstrate that "adversarial-malware as a service" is a realistic threat, as we automatically generate thousands of realistic and inconspicuous adversarial applications at scale, where on average it takes only a few minutes to generate an adversarial app. Our formalization of problem-space attacks paves the way to more principled research in this domain.

Includes members:
  Member "misleading authorship attribution of source code using adversarial learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "backdooring and poisoning neural networks with image scaling attacks")
  Member "on evaluating adversarial robustness":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "anomalous instance detection in deep learning a survey")
  Member "tesseract eliminating experimental bias in malware classification across space and time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "on model evaluation under non constant class imbalance")
  Member "evading classifiers in discrete domains with provable optimality guarantees":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "adversarial examples for deep learning cyber security analytics")
  Member "wild patterns ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence")
  Member "textbugger generating adversarial text against real world applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "advbox a toolbox to generate adversarial examples that fool neural networks")
  Member "generating natural language adversarial examples":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "humpty dumpty controlling word meanings via corpus poisoning")
  Member "adversarial malware binaries evading deep learning for malware detection in executables":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "automatic generation of adversarial examples for interpreting malware classifiers")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)