human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "f bleau fast black box leakage estimation"):
  Abstract: We consider the problem of measuring how much a system reveals about its secret inputs. We work under the black-box setting: we assume no prior knowledge of the system's internals, and we run the system for choices of secrets and measure its leakage from the respective outputs. Our goal is to estimate the Bayes risk, from which one can derive some of the most popular leakage measures (e.g., min-entropy, additive, and multiplicative leakage). #R##N#The state-of-the-art method for estimating these leakage measures is the frequentist paradigm, which approximates the system's internals by looking at the frequencies of its inputs and outputs. Unfortunately, this does not scale for systems with large output spaces, where it would require too many input-output examples. Consequently, it also cannot be applied to systems with continuous outputs (e.g., time side channels, network traffic). #R##N#In this paper, we exploit an analogy between Machine Learning (ML) and black-box leakage estimation to show that the Bayes risk of a system can be estimated by using a class of ML methods: the universally consistent learning rules; these rules can exploit patterns in the input-output examples to improve the estimates' convergence, while retaining formal optimality guarantees. We focus on a set of them, the nearest neighbor rules; we show that they significantly reduce the number of black-box queries required for a precise estimation whenever nearby outputs tend to be produced by the same secret; furthermore, some of them can tackle systems with continuous outputs. We illustrate the applicability of these techniques on both synthetic and real-world data, and we compare them with the state-of-the-art tool, leakiEst, which is based on the frequentist approach.

Includes members:
  Member "mine mutual information neural estimation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "intelligence physics and information the tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity in machine learning")
  Member "learning to explain an information theoretic perspective on model interpretation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "bayes not naive security bounds on website fingerprinting defenses":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "mockingbird defending against deep learning based website fingerprinting attacks with adversarial traces")
  Member "back to the drawing board revisiting the design of optimal location privacy preserving mechanisms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "memguard defending against black box membership inference attacks via adversarial examples")
  Member "membership inference attacks against machine learning models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "the future of digital health with federated learning")
  Member "infogan interpretable representation learning by information maximizing generative adversarial nets":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "geo indistinguishability differential privacy for location based systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "local information privacy and its application to privacy preserving data aggregation")
  Member "on an improvement over renyi s equivocation bound":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "generating optimal privacy protection mechanisms via machine learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)