human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "how to win first order safety games"):
  Abstract: First-order (FO) transition systems have recently attracted attention for the verification of parametric systems such as network protocols, software-defined networks or multi-agent workflows like conference management systems. Functional correctness or noninterference of these systems have conveniently been formulated as safety properties. In order to automatically synthesize predicates to enforce safety or noninterference, we generalize FO transition systems to FO safety games. For the important case of FO games with monadic predicates only, we provide a complete classification into decidable and undecidable cases. #R##N#For games with non-monadic predicates, we concentrate on universal first-order invariants, since these are sufficient to express a large class of noninterference properties. Based on general techniques for second-order quantifier elimination, we provide abstraction and refinement techniques to synthesize FO-expressible strategies that enforce safety. #R##N#We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach by automatically inferring nontrivial FO specifications for message passing in a leader election protocol as well as for a conference management system to exclude unappreciated disclosure of reports.

Includes members:
  Member "evolving algebras 1993 lipari guide":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a behavioural theory of recursive algorithms")
  Member "verifying security policies in multi agent workflows with loops":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "paxos made epr decidable reasoning about distributed protocols":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "what s live understanding distributed consensus")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science)