human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "deep residual auto encoders for expectation maximization based dictionary learning"):
  Abstract: Convolutional dictionary learning (CDL) has become a popular method for learning sparse representations from data. State-of-the-art algorithms perform dictionary learning (DL) through an optimization-based alternating-minimization procedure that comprises a sparse coding and a dictionary update step respectively. Here, we draw connections between CDL and neural networks by proposing an architecture for CDL termed the constrained recurrent sparse auto-encoder (CRsAE). We leverage the interpretation of the alternating-minimization algorithm for DL as an Expectation-Maximization algorithm to develop auto-encoders (AEs) that, for the first time, enable the simultaneous training of the dictionary and regularization parameter. The forward pass of the encoder, which performs sparse coding, solves the E-step using an encoding matrix and a soft-thresholding non-linearity imposed by the FISTA algorithm. The encoder in this regard is a variant of residual and recurrent neural networks. The M-step is implemented via a two-stage back-propagation. In the first stage, we perform back-propagation through the AE formed by the encoder and a linear decoder whose parameters are tied to the encoder. This stage parallels the dictionary update step in DL. In the second stage, we update the regularization parameter by performing back-propagation through the encoder using a loss function that includes a prior on the parameter motivated by Bayesian statistics. We leverage GPUs to achieve significant computational gains relative to state-of-the-art optimization-based approaches to CDL. We apply CRsAE to spike sorting, the problem of identifying the time of occurrence of neural action potentials in recordings of electrical activity from the brain. We demonstrate on recordings lasting hours that CRsAE speeds up spike sorting by 900x compared to notoriously slow classical algorithms based on convex optimization.

Includes members:
  Member "on the convergence of adam and beyond":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "disentangling adaptive gradient methods from learning rates")
  Member "scalable convolutional dictionary learning with constrained recurrent sparse auto encoders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "convolutional dictionary learning based auto encoders for natural exponential family distributions")
  Member "convolutional dictionary learning a comparative review and new algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "convolutional dictionary learning based auto encoders for natural exponential family distributions")
  Member "cyclical learning rates for training neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning")
  Member "deep residual learning for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "adam a method for stochastic optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "deep unfolding model based inspiration of novel deep architectures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "theoretical interpretation of learned step size in deep unfolded gradient descent")
  Member "k sparse autoencoders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "human to ai coach improving human inputs to ai systems")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)