human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on the linguistic representational power of neural machine translation models"):
  Abstract: Despite the recent success of deep neural networks in natural language processing (NLP), their interpretability remains a challenge. We analyze the representations learned by neural machine translation models at various levels of granularity and evaluate their quality through relevant extrinsic properties. In particular, we seek answers to the following questions: (i) How accurately is word-structure captured within the learned representations, an important aspect in translating morphologically-rich languages? (ii) Do the representations capture long-range dependencies, and effectively handle syntactically divergent languages? (iii) Do the representations capture lexical semantics? We conduct a thorough investigation along several parameters: (i) Which layers in the architecture capture each of these linguistic phenomena; (ii) How does the choice of translation unit (word, character, or subword unit) impact the linguistic properties captured by the underlying representations? (iii) Do the encoder and decoder learn differently and independently? (iv) Do the representations learned by multilingual NMT models capture the same amount of linguistic information as their bilingual counterparts? Our data-driven, quantitative evaluation illuminates important aspects in NMT models and their ability to capture various linguistic phenomena. We show that deep NMT models learn a non-trivial amount of linguistic information. Notable findings include: i) Word morphology and part-of-speech information are captured at the lower layers of the model; (ii) In contrast, lexical semantics or non-local syntactic and semantic dependencies are better represented at the higher layers; (iii) Representations learned using characters are more informed about wordmorphology compared to those learned using subword units; and (iv) Representations learned by multilingual models are richer compared to bilingual models.

Includes members:
  Member "to tune or not to tune adapting pretrained representations to diverse tasks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "contextual lensing of universal sentence representations")
  Member "what do you learn from context probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "the emergence of number and syntax units in lstm language models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networks")
  Member "a hybrid morpheme word representation for machine translation of morphologically rich languages":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "subword elmo")
  Member "linguistic knowledge and transferability of contextual representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a survey on contextual embeddings")
  Member "the missing ingredient in zero shot neural machine translation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "a brief survey of multilingual neural machine translation")
  Member "language modeling teaches you more syntax than translation does lessons learned through auxiliary task analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "linguistic knowledge and transferability of contextual representations")
  Member "bpe and charcnns for translation of morphology a cross lingual comparison and analysis":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "character aware decoder for neural machine translation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)