human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "neurovectorizer end to end vectorization with deep reinforcement learning"):
  Abstract: One of the key challenges arising when compilers vectorize loops for today's SIMD-compatible architectures is to decide if vectorization or interleaving is beneficial. Then, the compiler has to determine how many instructions to pack together and how many loop iterations to interleave. Compilers are designed today to use fixed-cost models that are based on heuristics to make vectorization decisions on loops. However, these models are unable to capture the data dependency, the computation graph, or the organization of instructions. Alternatively, software engineers often hand-write the vectorization factors of every loop. This, however, places a huge burden on them, since it requires prior experience and significantly increases the development time. In this work, we explore a novel approach for handling loop vectorization and propose an end-to-end solution using deep reinforcement learning (RL). We conjecture that deep RL can capture different instructions, dependencies, and data structures to enable learning a sophisticated model that can better predict the actual performance cost and determine the optimal vectorization factors. We develop an end-to-end framework, from code to vectorization, that integrates deep RL in the LLVM compiler. Our proposed framework takes benchmark codes as input and extracts the loop codes. These loop codes are then fed to a loop embedding generator that learns an embedding for these loops. Finally, the learned embeddings are used as input to a Deep RL agent, which determines the vectorization factors for all the loops. We further extend our framework to support multiple supervised learning methods. We evaluate our approaches against the currently used LLVM vectorizer and loop polyhedral optimization techniques. Our experiments show 1.29X-4.73X performance speedup compared to baseline and only 3% worse than the brute-force search on a wide range of benchmarks.

Includes members:
  Member "a survey on compiler autotuning using machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "a view on deep reinforcement learning in system optimization")
  Member "a view on deep reinforcement learning in system optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "autophase juggling hls phase orderings in random forests with deep reinforcement learning")
  Member "code2vec learning distributed representations of code":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "adversarial robustness for code")
  Member "machine learning in compiler optimisation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the deep learning compiler a comprehensive survey")
  Member "tune a research platform for distributed model selection and training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "hyper parameter optimization a review of algorithms and applications")
  Member "ray a distributed framework for emerging ai applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "effective diversity in population based reinforcement learning")
  Member "rllib abstractions for distributed reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "review analyze and design a comprehensive deep reinforcement learning framework")
  Member "proximal policy optimization algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)