human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on the understanding and interpretation of machine learning predictions in clinical gait analysis using explainable artificial intelligence"):
  Abstract: Systems incorporating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly used to guide decision-making in the healthcare sector. While AI-based systems provide powerful and promising results with regard to their classification and prediction accuracy (e.g., in differentiating between different disorders in human gait), most share a central limitation, namely their black-box character. Understanding which features classification models learn, whether they are meaningful and consequently whether their decisions are trustworthy is difficult and often impossible to comprehend. This severely hampers their applicability as decision-support systems in clinical practice. There is a strong need for AI-based systems to provide transparency and justification of predictions, which are necessary also for ethical and legal compliance. As a consequence, in recent years the field of explainable AI (XAI) has gained increasing importance. The primary aim of this article is to investigate whether XAI methods can enhance transparency, explainability and interpretability of predictions in automated clinical gait classification. We utilize a dataset comprising bilateral three-dimensional ground reaction force measurements from 132 patients with different lower-body gait disorders and 62 healthy controls. In our experiments, we included several gait classification tasks, employed a representative set of classification methods, and a well-established XAI method - Layer-wise Relevance Propagation - to explain decisions at the signal (input) level. The presented approach exemplifies how XAI can be used to understand and interpret state-of-the-art ML models trained for gait classification tasks, and shows that the features that are considered relevant for machine learning models can be attributed to meaningful and clinically relevant biomechanical gait characteristics.

Includes members:
  Member "towards best practice in explaining neural network decisions with lrp":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "verifying deep learning based decisions for facial expression recognition")
  Member "one explanation does not fit all a toolkit and taxonomy of ai explainability techniques":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "survlime a method for explaining machine learning survival models")
  Member "unmasking clever hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "understanding image captioning models beyond visualizing attention")
  Member "a survey on explainable artificial intelligence xai towards medical xai":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "neural generators of sparse local linear models for achieving both accuracy and interpretability")
  Member "automatic classification of functional gait disorders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "sam the sensitivity of attribution methods to hyperparameters")
  Member "explaining the unique nature of individual gait patterns with deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "towards explainable artificial intelligence")
  Member "explainable artificial intelligence understanding visualizing and interpreting deep learning models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "on the convergence of artificial intelligence and distributed ledger technology a scoping review and future research agenda")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)