human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "semantic relatedness for keyword disambiguation exploiting different embeddings"):
  Abstract: Understanding the meaning of words is crucial for many tasks that involve human-machine interaction. This has been tackled by research in Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) in the Natural Language Processing (NLP) field. Recently, WSD and many other NLP tasks have taken advantage of embeddings-based representation of words, sentences, and documents. However, when it comes to WSD, most embeddings models suffer from ambiguity as they do not capture the different possible meanings of the words. Even when they do, the list of possible meanings for a word (sense inventory) has to be known in advance at training time to be included in the embeddings space. Unfortunately, there are situations in which such a sense inventory is not known in advance (e.g., an ontology selected at run-time), or it evolves with time and its status diverges from the one at training time. This hampers the use of embeddings models for WSD. Furthermore, traditional WSD techniques do not perform well in situations in which the available linguistic information is very scarce, such as the case of keyword-based queries. In this paper, we propose an approach to keyword disambiguation which grounds on a semantic relatedness between words and senses provided by an external inventory (ontology) that is not known at training time. Building on previous works, we present a semantic relatedness measure that uses word embeddings, and explore different disambiguation algorithms to also exploit both word and sentence representations. Experimental results show that this approach achieves results comparable with the state of the art when applied for WSD, without training for a particular domain.

Includes members:
  Member "word sense disambiguation a complex network approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "using word embeddings to improve the discriminability of co occurrence text networks")
  Member "from word to sense embeddings a survey on vector representations of meaning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "tedl a text encryption method based on deep learning")
  Member "deep contextualized word representations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")
  Member "knowledge based word sense disambiguation using topic models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "zero shot entity linking by reading entity descriptions")
  Member "embedding words and senses together via joint knowledge enhanced training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "modelling semantic categories using conceptual neighborhood")
  Member "an empirical evaluation of doc2vec with practical insights into document embedding generation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "can x2vec save lives integrating graph and language embeddings for automatic mental health classification")
  Member "distributed representations of sentences and documents":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "chameleon a deep learning meta architecture for news recommender systems phd thesis")
  Member "distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "multi simlex a large scale evaluation of multilingual and cross lingual lexical semantic similarity")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CL(Computation and Language)