human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "assortment auctions a myersonian characterization for markov chain based choice models"):
  Abstract: We introduce the assortment auction optimization problem, defined as follows. A seller has a set of substitute products with exogenously-given prices. Each buyer has a ranked list from which she would like to purchase at most one product. The buyers report their lists to the seller, who then allocates products to the buyers using a truthful mechanism, subject to constraints on how many products can be allocated. The seller collects revenues equal to the prices of the products allocated, and would like to design an auction to maximize total revenue, when the buyers' lists are drawn independently from known distributions. #R##N#If there is a single buyer, then our problem reduces to the assortment optimization problem, which is solved for Markov Chain choice models. We extend this result and compute the optimal assortment auction when each buyer's list distribution arises from its own Markov chain. Moreover, we show that the optimal auction is structurally ``Myersonian'', in that each buyer is assigned a virtual valuation based on her list and Markov chain, and then the mechanism maximizes virtual surplus. Since Markov Chain choice models capture valuation distributions, our optimal assortment auction generalizes the classical Myerson's auction. Markov chains also capture the commonly used MNL choice model. We show that without the Markov chain assumption, the optimal assortment auction may be structurally non-Myersonian. #R##N#Finally, we apply the concept of an assortment auction in online assortment problems. We show that any personalized assortment policy is a special case of a truthful assortment auction, and that moreover, the optimal auction provides a tighter relaxation for online policies than the commonly-used ``deterministic LP''. Using this fact, we improve many online assortment policies, and derive the first approximation guarantees that strictly exceed 1-1/e.

Includes members:
  Member "prophet inequalities on the intersection of a matroid and a graph":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "multi stage and multi customer assortment optimization with inventory constraints":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "online assortment with limited inventories and set dependent revenues")
  Member "prophet secretary through blind strategies":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "prophet inequalities with linear correlations and augmentations")
  Member "a duality based unified approach to bayesian mechanism design":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "a permutation equivariant neural network architecture for auction design")
  Member "dynamic pricing under a static calendar":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "multi stage and multi customer assortment optimization with inventory constraints")
  Member "improved approximations for free order prophets and second price auctions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "lp based approximation for personalized reserve prices")
  Member "on policies for single leg revenue management with limited demand information":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "dynamic pricing under a static calendar")
  Member "welfare maximization and truthfulness in mechanism design with ordinal preferences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "size versus truthfulness in the house allocation problem")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory)