human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "catching up with trends the changing landscape of political discussions on twitter in 2014 and 2019"):
  Abstract: The advent of 4G increased the usage of internet in India, which took a huge number of discussions online. Online Social Networks (OSNs) are the center of these discussions. During elections, political discussions constitute a significant portion of the trending topics on these networks. Politicians and political parties catch up with these trends, and social media then becomes a part of their publicity agenda. We cannot ignore this trend in any election, be it the U.S, Germany, France, or India. Twitter is a major platform where we observe these trends. In this work, we examine the magnitude of political discussions on twitter by contrasting the platform usage on levels like gender, political party, and geography, in 2014 and 2019 Indian General Elections. In a further attempt to understand the strategies followed by political parties, we compare twitter usage by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Indian National Congress (INC) in 2019 General Elections in terms of how efficiently they make use of the platform. We specifically analyze the handles of politicians who emerged victorious. We then proceed to compare political handles held by frontmen of BJP and INC: Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) and Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) using parameters like "following", "tweeting habits", "sources used to tweet", along with text analysis of tweets. With this work, we also introduce a rich dataset covering a majority of tweets made during the election period in 2014 and 2019.

Includes members:
  Member "tactics and tallies inferring voter preferences in the 2016 u s presidential primaries using sparse learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "catching fire via likes inferring topic preferences of trump followers on twitter":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "how polarized have we become a multimodal classification of trump followers and clinton followers")
  Member "twitter and polls analyzing and estimating political orientation of twitter users in india general elections2014":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "is change the only constant profile change perspective on loksabhaelections2019")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.SI(Social and Information Networks)