human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "foundations properties and security applications of puzzles a survey"):
  Abstract: Cryptographic algorithms have been used not only to create robust ciphertexts, but also to generate cryptograms that, contrary to the classic goal of cryptography, are meant to be broken. These cryptograms, generally called puzzles, required the use of a certain amount of resources to find the solution, introducing a time delay and, in some cases, an economic cost. These powerful features have made puzzles the core of many security protocols, giving them increasingly importance in the IT security landscape. The concept of puzzle has subsequently been extended to other types of schemes that do not use cryptographic functions, like CAPTCHAs, used to discriminate humans from machines, and has experienced a renewed interest with the advent of Bitcoin. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive study of the most important puzzle construction schemes present in the literature, categorizing them according to several attributes, such as resource type, verification type, and applications. We have redefined the term puzzle by collecting and integrating the scattered notions used in different works, to cover all the existing applications. Finally, we provide an overview of the possible applications, identifying key requirements and different design approaches. Then, we highlight features and limitations of each approach, providing a useful guide for the future development of new puzzle schemes.

Includes members:
  Member "revisiting client puzzles for state exhaustion attacks resilience":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "majority is not enough bitcoin mining is vulnerable":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "on the convergence of artificial intelligence and distributed ledger technology a scoping review and future research agenda")
  Member "sybilcontrol practical sybil defense with computational puzzles":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "resource competitive sybil defenses")
  Member "a new bound on the performance of the bandwidth puzzle":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CR(Cryptography and Security)