human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "evaluating scalable uncertainty estimation methods for dnn based molecular property prediction"):
  Abstract: Advances in deep neural network (DNN) based molecular property prediction have recently led to the development of models of remarkable accuracy and generalization ability, with graph convolution neural networks (GCNNs) reporting state-of-the-art performance for this task. However, some challenges remain and one of the most important that needs to be fully addressed concerns uncertainty quantification. DNN performance is affected by the volume and the quality of the training samples. Therefore, establishing when and to what extent a prediction can be considered reliable is just as important as outputting accurate predictions, especially when out-of-domain molecules are targeted. Recently, several methods to account for uncertainty in DNNs have been proposed, most of which are based on approximate Bayesian inference. Among these, only a few scale to the large datasets required in applications. Evaluating and comparing these methods has recently attracted great interest, but results are generally fragmented and absent for molecular property prediction. In this paper, we aim to quantitatively compare scalable techniques for uncertainty estimation in GCNNs. We introduce a set of quantitative criteria to capture different uncertainty aspects, and then use these criteria to compare MC-Dropout, deep ensembles, and bootstrapping, both theoretically in a unified framework that separates aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty and experimentally on the QM9 dataset. Our experiments quantify the performance of the different uncertainty estimation methods and their impact on uncertainty-related error reduction. Our findings indicate that ensembling and bootstrapping consistently outperform MC-Dropout, with different context-specific pros and cons. Our analysis also leads to a better understanding of the role of aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty and highlights the challenge posed by out-of-domain uncertainty.

Includes members:
  Member "cyclical stochastic gradient mcmc for bayesian deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "gradient based adversarial attacks on categorical sequence models via traversing an embedded world")
  Member "evaluating and calibrating uncertainty prediction in regression tasks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "semi local 3d lane detection and uncertainty estimation")
  Member "evaluating scalable bayesian deep learning methods for robust computer vision":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "bayesian deep learning and a probabilistic perspective of generalization")
  Member "bayesian semi supervised learning for uncertainty calibrated prediction of molecular properties and active learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a comprehensive study on the prediction reliability of graph neural networks for virtual screening")
  Member "accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a financial service chatbot based on deep bidirectional transformers")
  Member "evaluating bayesian deep learning methods for semantic segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "scalable uncertainty for computer vision with functional variational inference")
  Member "uncertainty estimates and multi hypotheses networks for optical flow":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "distilled hierarchical neural ensembles with adaptive inference cost")
  Member "on calibration of modern neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "spatiotemporal relationship reasoning for pedestrian intent prediction")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)