human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "doublesqueeze parallel stochastic gradient descent with double pass error compensated compression"):
  Abstract: A standard approach in large scale machine learning is distributed stochastic gradient training, which requires the computation of aggregated stochastic gradients over multiple nodes on a network. Communication is a major bottleneck in such applications, and in recent years, compressed stochastic gradient methods such as QSGD (quantized SGD) and sparse SGD have been proposed to reduce communication. It was also shown that error compensation can be combined with compression to achieve better convergence in a scheme that each node compresses its local stochastic gradient and broadcast the result to all other nodes over the network in a single pass. However, such a single pass broadcast approach is not realistic in many practical implementations. For example, under the popular parameter server model for distributed learning, the worker nodes need to send the compressed local gradients to the parameter server, which performs the aggregation. The parameter server has to compress the aggregated stochastic gradient again before sending it back to the worker nodes. In this work, we provide a detailed analysis on this two-pass communication model and its asynchronous parallel variant, with error-compensated compression both on the worker nodes and on the parameter server. We show that the error-compensated stochastic gradient algorithm admits three very nice properties: 1) it is compatible with an \emph{arbitrary} compression technique; 2) it admits an improved convergence rate than the non error-compensated stochastic gradient methods such as QSGD and sparse SGD; 3) it admits linear speedup with respect to the number of workers. The empirical study is also conducted to validate our theoretical results.

Includes members:
  Member "error feedback fixes signsgd and other gradient compression schemes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "communication optimization strategies for distributed deep learning a survey")
  Member "pipe sgd a decentralized pipelined sgd framework for distributed deep net training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "turbo aggregate breaking the quadratic aggregation barrier in secure federated learning")
  Member "communication compression for decentralized training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "stochastic sign sgd for federated learning with theoretical guarantees")
  Member "sparcml high performance sparse communication for machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "communication optimization strategies for distributed deep learning a survey")
  Member "improving the privacy and accuracy of admm based distributed algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "local sgd with periodic averaging tighter analysis and adaptive synchronization")
  Member "sparsified sgd with memory":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "sparse weight activation training")
  Member "signsgd compressed optimisation for non convex problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "communication optimization strategies for distributed deep learning a survey")
  Member "error compensated quantized sgd and its applications to large scale distributed optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "communication optimization strategies for distributed deep learning a survey")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)