human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the design and implementation of a scalable dl benchmarking platform"):
  Abstract: The current Deep Learning (DL) landscape is fast-paced and is rife with non-uniform models, hardware/software (HW/SW) stacks, but lacks a DL benchmarking platform to facilitate evaluation and comparison of DL innovations, be it models, frameworks, libraries, or hardware. Due to the lack of a benchmarking platform, the current practice of evaluating the benefits of proposed DL innovations is both arduous and error-prone - stifling the adoption of the innovations. #R##N#In this work, we first identify $10$ design features which are desirable within a DL benchmarking platform. These features include: performing the evaluation in a consistent, reproducible, and scalable manner, being framework and hardware agnostic, supporting real-world benchmarking workloads, providing in-depth model execution inspection across the HW/SW stack levels, etc. We then propose MLModelScope, a DL benchmarking platform design that realizes the $10$ objectives. MLModelScope proposes a specification to define DL model evaluations and techniques to provision the evaluation workflow using the user-specified HW/SW stack. MLModelScope defines abstractions for frameworks and supports board range of DL models and evaluation scenarios. We implement MLModelScope as an open-source project with support for all major frameworks and hardware architectures. Through MLModelScope's evaluation and automated analysis workflows, we performed case-study analyses of $37$ models across $4$ systems and show how model, hardware, and framework selection affects model accuracy and performance under different benchmarking scenarios. We further demonstrated how MLModelScope's tracing capability gives a holistic view of model execution and helps pinpoint bottlenecks.

Includes members:
  Member "random search and reproducibility for neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "automl zero evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch")
  Member "aibench an industry standard internet service ai benchmark suite":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "mlmodelscope a distributed platform for ml model evaluation and benchmarking at scale")
  Member "analysis of dawnbench a time to accuracy machine learning performance benchmark":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "towards the systematic reporting of the energy and carbon footprints of machine learning")
  Member "dynamic control flow in large scale machine learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "a simple differentiable programming language")
  Member "tbd benchmarking and analyzing deep neural network training":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "aibench an agile domain specific benchmarking methodology and an ai benchmark suite")
  Member "tensorflow serving flexible high performance ml serving":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "aibench an agile domain specific benchmarking methodology and an ai benchmark suite")
  Member "clipper a low latency online prediction serving system":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "mxnet a flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "attention guided chained context aggregation for semantic segmentation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)