human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "heavy tailed universality predicts trends in test accuracies for very large pre trained deep neural networks"):
  Abstract: Given two or more Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) with the same or similar architectures, and trained on the same dataset, but trained with different solvers, parameters, hyper-parameters, regularization, etc., can we predict which DNN will have the best test accuracy, and can we do so without peeking at the test data? In this paper, we show how to use a new Theory of Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) to answer this. HT-SR suggests, among other things, that modern DNNs exhibit what we call Heavy-Tailed Mechanistic Universality (HT-MU), meaning that the correlations in the layer weight matrices can be fit to a power law with exponents that lie in common Universality classes from Heavy-Tailed Random Matrix Theory (HT-RMT). From this, we develop a Universal capacity control metric that is a weighted average of these PL exponents. Rather than considering small toy NNs, we examine over 50 different, large-scale pre-trained DNNs, ranging over 15 different architectures, trained on ImagetNet, each of which has been reported to have different test accuracies. We show that this new capacity metric correlates very well with the reported test accuracies of these DNNs, looking across each architecture (VGG16/.../VGG19, ResNet10/.../ResNet152, etc.). We also show how to approximate the metric by the more familiar Product Norm capacity measure, as the average of the log Frobenius norm of the layer weight matrices. Our approach requires no changes to the underlying DNN or its loss function, it does not require us to train a model (although it could be used to monitor training), and it does not even require access to the ImageNet data.

Includes members:
  Member "a jamming transition from under to over parametrization affects generalization in deep learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "self adaptive training beyond empirical risk minimization")
  Member "traditional and heavy tailed self regularization in neural network models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "resilient cyberphysical systems and their application drivers a technology roadmap")
  Member "on the optimization of deep networks implicit acceleration by overparameterization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "implicit self regularization in deep neural networks evidence from random matrix theory and implications for learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "self orthogonality module a network architecture plug in for learning orthogonal filters")
  Member "theory iiib generalization in deep networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "think global act local relating dnn generalisation and node level snr")
  Member "stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approach":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "train large then compress rethinking model size for efficient training and inference of transformers")
  Member "rethinking generalization requires revisiting old ideas statistical mechanics approaches and complex learning behavior":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "predicting trends in the quality of state of the art neural networks without access to training or testing data")
  Member "a surprising linear relationship predicts test performance in deep networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "an empirical study of large batch stochastic gradient descent with structured covariance noise")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)