human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "facebook ads as a demographic tool to measure the urban rural divide"):
  Abstract: In the global move toward urbanization, making sure the people remaining in rural areas are not left behind in terms of development and policy considerations is a priority for governments worldwide. However, it is increasingly challenging to track important statistics concerning this sparse, geographically dispersed population, resulting in a lack of reliable, up-to-date data. In this study, we examine the usefulness of the Facebook Advertising platform, which offers a digital "census" of over two billions of its users, in measuring potential rural-urban inequalities. We focus on Italy, a country where about 30% of the population lives in rural areas. First, we show that the population statistics that Facebook produces suffer from instability across time and incomplete coverage of sparsely populated municipalities. To overcome such limitation, we propose an alternative methodology for estimating Facebook Ads audiences that nearly triples the coverage of the rural municipalities from 19% to 55% and makes feasible fine-grained sub-population analysis. Using official national census data, we evaluate our approach and confirm known significant urban-rural divides in terms of educational attainment and income. Extending the analysis to Facebook-specific user "interests" and behaviors, we provide further insights on the divide, for instance, finding that rural areas show a higher interest in gambling. Notably, we find that the most predictive features of income in rural areas differ from those for urban centres, suggesting researchers need to consider a broader range of attributes when examining rural wellbeing. The findings of this study illustrate the necessity of improving existing tools and methodologies to include under-represented populations in digital demographic studies -- the failure to do so could result in misleading observations, conclusions, and most importantly, policies.

Includes members:
  Member "human values and attitudes towards vaccination in social media":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "moralstrength exploiting a moral lexicon and embedding similarity for moral foundations prediction")
  Member "analyzing gender inequality through large scale facebook advertising data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "boosting privately privacy preserving federated extreme boosting for mobile crowdsensing")
  Member "predicting demographics moral foundations and human values from digital behaviours":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "moralstrength exploiting a moral lexicon and embedding similarity for moral foundations prediction")
  Member "parents mention sons more often than daughters on social media":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "effect of values and technology use on exercise implications for personalized behavior change interventions":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "moralstrength exploiting a moral lexicon and embedding similarity for moral foundations prediction")
  Member "demographic differentials in facebook usage around the world":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "a total error framework for digital traces of humans":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "mater certa est pater numquam what can facebook advertising data tell us about male fertility rates":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "rock rap or reggaeton assessing mexican immigrants cultural assimilation using facebook data")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CY(Computers and Society)