human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "influence of neighborhood on the preference of an item in ecommerce search"):
  Abstract: Surfacing a ranked list of items for a search query to help buyers discover inventory and make purchase decisions is a critical problem in eCommerce search. Typically, items are independently predicted with a probability of sale with respect to a given search query. But in a dynamic marketplace like eBay, even for a single product, there are various different factors distinguishing one item from another which can influence the purchase decision for the user. Users have to make a purchase decision by considering all of these options. Majority of the existing learning to rank algorithms model the relative relevance between labeled items only at the loss functions like pairwise or list-wise losses. But they are limited to point-wise scoring functions where items are ranked independently based on the features of the item itself. In this paper, we study the influence of an item's neighborhood to its purchase decision. Here, we consider the neighborhood as the items ranked above and below the current item in search results. By adding delta features comparing items within a neighborhood and learning a ranking model, we are able to experimentally show that the new ranker with delta features outperforms our baseline ranker in terms of Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR). The ranking models with proposed delta features result in $3-5\%$ improvement in MRR over the baseline model. We also study impact of different sizes for neighborhood. Experimental results show that neighborhood size $3$ perform the best based on MRR with an improvement of $4-5\%$ over the baseline model.

Includes members:
  Member "on application of learning to rank for e commerce search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "handling position bias for unbiased learning to rank in hotels search")
  Member "query chains learning to rank from implicit feedback":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "semeval 2016 task 3 community question answering")
  Member "learning to order things":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "improving label ranking ensembles using boosting techniques")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.IR(Information Retrieval)