human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "learning aided physical layer attacks against multicarrier communications in iot"):
  Abstract: Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices that are limited in power and processing capabilities are susceptible to physical layer (PHY) spoofing attacks owing to their inability to implement a full-blown protocol stack for security. The overwhelming adoption of multicarrier communications for the PHY layer makes IoT devices further vulnerable to PHY spoofing attacks. These attacks which aim at injecting bogus data into the receiver, involve inferring transmission parameters and finding PHY characteristics of the transmitted signals so as to spoof the received signal. Non-contiguous orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (NC-OFDM) systems have been argued to have low probability of exploitation (LPE) characteristics against classic attacks based on cyclostationary analysis. However, with the advent of machine learning (ML) algorithms, adversaries can devise data-driven attacks to compromise such systems. It is in this vein that PHY spoofing performance of adversaries equipped with supervised and unsupervised ML tools are investigated in this paper. The supervised ML approach is based on estimation/classification utilizing deep neural networks (DNN) while the unsupervised one employs variational autoencoders (VAEs). In particular, VAEs are shown to be capable of learning representations from NC-OFDM signals related to their PHY characteristics such as frequency pattern and modulation scheme, which are useful for PHY spoofing. In addition, a new metric based on the disentanglement principle is proposed to measure the quality of such learned representations. Simulation results demonstrate that the performance of the spoofing adversaries highly depends on the subcarriers' allocation patterns used at the transmitter. Particularly, it is shown that utilizing a random subcarrier occupancy pattern precludes the adversary from spoofing and secures NC-OFDM systems against ML-based attacks.

Includes members:
  Member "communication without interception defense against deep learning based modulation detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "when wireless security meets machine learning motivation challenges and research directions")
  Member "an overview of physical layer security with finite alphabet signaling":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      (none)
  Member "an introduction to deep learning for the physical layer":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a survey on machine learning based performance improvement of wireless networks phy mac and network layer")
  Member "variational inference of disentangled latent concepts from unlabeled observations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "nestedvae isolating common factors via weak supervision")
  Member "infovae information maximizing variational autoencoders":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "nestedvae isolating common factors via weak supervision")
  Member "power of deep learning for channel estimation and signal detection in ofdm systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a deep learning framework for optimization of miso downlink beamforming")
  Member "a survey on wireless security technical challenges recent advances and future trends":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "physical layer security in the finite blocklength regime over fading channels")
  Member "fingerprints in the ether using the physical layer for wireless authentication":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "physical layer authentication in mission critical mtc networks a security and delay performance analysis")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)