human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "a high efficiency framework for constructing large scale face parsing benchmark"):
  Abstract: Face parsing, which is to assign a semantic label to each pixel in face images, has recently attracted increasing interest due to its huge application potentials. Although many face related fields (e.g., face recognition and face detection) have been well studied for many years, the existing datasets for face parsing are still severely limited in terms of the scale and quality, e.g., the widely used Helen dataset only contains 2,330 images. This is mainly because pixel-level annotation is a high cost and time-consuming work, especially for the facial parts without clear boundaries. The lack of accurate annotated datasets becomes a major obstacle in the progress of face parsing task. It is a feasible way to utilize dense facial landmarks to guide the parsing annotation. However, annotating dense landmarks on human face encounters the same issues as the parsing annotation. To overcome the above problems, in this paper, we develop a high-efficiency framework for face parsing annotation, which considerably simplifies and speeds up the parsing annotation by two consecutive modules. Benefit from the proposed framework, we construct a new Dense Landmark Guided Face Parsing (LaPa) benchmark. It consists of 22,000 face images with large variations in expression, pose, occlusion, etc. Each image is provided with accurate annotation of a 11-category pixel-level label map along with coordinates of 106-point landmarks. To the best of our knowledge, it is currently the largest public dataset for face parsing. To make full use of our LaPa dataset with abundant face shape and boundary priors, we propose a simple yet effective Boundary-Sensitive Parsing Network (BSPNet). Our network is taken as a baseline model on the proposed LaPa dataset, and meanwhile, it achieves the state-of-the-art performance on the Helen dataset without resorting to extra face alignment.

Includes members:
  Member "devil in the details towards accurate single and multiple human parsing":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "hierarchical human parsing with typed part relation reasoning")
  Member "look at boundary a boundary aware face alignment algorithm":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "kpnet towards minimal face detector")
  Member "style aggregated network for facial landmark detection":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "kpnet towards minimal face detector")
  Member "synthesis of high quality visible faces from polarimetric thermal faces using generative adversarial networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "polarimetric thermal to visible face verification via self attention guided synthesis")
  Member "how far are we from solving the 2d 3d face alignment problem and a dataset of 230 000 3d facial landmarks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "first order motion model for image animation")
  Member "face parsing via recurrent propagation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "learning structure via consensus for face segmentation and parsing")
  Member "rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "probabilistic future prediction for video scene understanding")
  Member "stacked hourglass networks for human pose estimation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "learning enriched features for real image restoration and enhancement")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)