human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "an empirical study towards characterizing deep learning development and deployment across different frameworks and platforms"):
  Abstract: Deep Learning (DL) has recently achieved tremendous success. A variety of DL frameworks and platforms play a key role to catalyze such progress. However, the differences in architecture designs and implementations of existing frameworks and platforms bring new challenges for DL software development and deployment. Till now, there is no study on how various mainstream frameworks and platforms influence both DL software development and deployment in practice. To fill this gap, we take the first step towards understanding how the most widely-used DL frameworks and platforms support the DL software development and deployment. We conduct a systematic study on these frameworks and platforms by using two types of DNN architectures and three popular datasets. (1) For development process, we investigate the prediction accuracy under the same runtime training configuration or same model weights/biases. We also study the adversarial robustness of trained models by leveraging the existing adversarial attack techniques. The experimental results show that the computing differences across frameworks could result in an obvious prediction accuracy decline, which should draw the attention of DL developers. (2) For deployment process, we investigate the prediction accuracy and performance (refers to time cost and memory consumption) when the trained models are migrated/quantized from PC to real mobile devices and web browsers. The DL platform study unveils that the migration and quantization still suffer from compatibility and reliability issues. Meanwhile, we find several DL software bugs by using the results as a benchmark. We further validate the results through bug confirmation from stakeholders and industrial positive feedback to highlight the implications of our study. Through our study, we summarize practical guidelines, identify challenges and pinpoint new research directions.

Includes members:
  Member "moving deep learning into web browser how far can we go":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "jsdoop and tensorflow js volunteer distributed web browser based neural network training")
  Member "deep learning towards mobile applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "mdldroid a chainsgd reduce approach to mobile deep learning for personal mobile sensing")
  Member "deepgauge multi granularity testing criteria for deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "deepmutation mutation testing of deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")
  Member "a first look at deep learning apps on smartphones":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "neural architecture search over decentralized data")
  Member "lstm a search space odyssey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "refined gate a simple and effective gating mechanism for recurrent units")
  Member "foolbox v0 8 0 a python toolbox to benchmark the robustness of machine learning models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "advbox a toolbox to generate adversarial examples that fool neural networks")
  Member "deepxplore automated whitebox testing of deep learning systems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "importance driven deep learning system testing")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)