human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "is a good representation sufficient for sample efficient reinforcement learning"):
  Abstract: Modern deep learning methods provide an effective means to learn good representations. However, is a good representation itself sufficient for efficient reinforcement learning? This question is largely unexplored, and the extant body of literature mainly focuses on conditions which permit efficient reinforcement learning with little understanding of what are necessary conditions for efficient reinforcement learning. This work provides strong negative results for reinforcement learning methods with function approximation for which a good representation (feature extractor) is known to the agent, focusing on natural representational conditions relevant to value-based learning and policy-based learning. For value-based learning, we show that even if the agent has a highly accurate linear representation, the agent still needs to sample exponentially many trajectories in order to find a near-optimal policy. For policy-based learning, we show even if the agent's linear representation is capable of perfectly representing the optimal policy, the agent still needs to sample exponentially many trajectories in order to find a near-optimal policy. #R##N#These lower bounds highlight the fact that having a good (value-based or policy-based) representation in and of itself is insufficient for efficient reinforcement learning. In particular, these results provide new insights into why the existing provably efficient reinforcement learning methods rely on further assumptions, which are often model-based in nature. Additionally, our lower bounds imply exponential separations in the sample complexity between 1) value-based learning with perfect representation and value-based learning with a good-but-not-perfect representation, 2) value-based learning and policy-based learning, 3) policy-based learning and supervised learning and 4) reinforcement learning and imitation learning.

Includes members:
  Member "provably efficient rl with rich observations via latent state decoding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "learning zero sum simultaneous move markov games using function approximation and correlated equilibrium")
  Member "provably efficient reinforcement learning with linear function approximation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "learning zero sum simultaneous move markov games using function approximation and correlated equilibrium")
  Member "sample optimal parametric q learning using linearly additive features":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "learning zero sum simultaneous move markov games using function approximation and correlated equilibrium")
  Member "optimality and approximation with policy gradient methods in markov decision processes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "upper confidence primal dual optimization stochastically constrained markov decision processes with adversarial losses and unknown transitions")
  Member "non asymptotic gap dependent regret bounds for tabular mdps":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "learning zero sum simultaneous move markov games using function approximation and correlated equilibrium")
  Member "provably efficient q learning with function approximation via distribution shift error checking oracle":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "learning zero sum simultaneous move markov games using function approximation and correlated equilibrium")
  Member "information theoretic considerations in batch reinforcement learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "provably efficient exploration for rl with unsupervised learning")
  Member "a theory of regularized markov decision processes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "provably efficient exploration for rl with unsupervised learning")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)