human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "efficient average case population recovery in the presence of insertions and deletions"):
  Abstract: Several recent works have considered the \emph{trace reconstruction problem}, in which an unknown source string $x\in\{0,1\}^n$ is transmitted through a probabilistic channel which may randomly delete coordinates or insert random bits, resulting in a \emph{trace} of $x$. The goal is to reconstruct the original string~$x$ from independent traces of $x$. While the best algorithms known for worst-case strings use $\exp(O(n^{1/3}))$ traces \cite{DOS17,NazarovPeres17}, highly efficient algorithms are known \cite{PZ17,HPP18} for the \emph{average-case} version, in which $x$ is uniformly random. We consider a generalization of this average-case trace reconstruction problem, which we call \emph{average-case population recovery in the presence of insertions and deletions}. In this problem, there is an unknown distribution $\cal{D}$ over $s$ unknown source strings $x^1,\dots,x^s \in \{0,1\}^n$, and each sample is independently generated by drawing some $x^i$ from $\cal{D}$ and returning an independent trace of $x^i$. #R##N#Building on \cite{PZ17} and \cite{HPP18}, we give an efficient algorithm for this problem. For any support size $s \leq \smash{\exp(\Theta(n^{1/3}))}$, for a $1-o(1)$ fraction of all $s$-element support sets $\{x^1,\dots,x^s\} \subset \{0,1\}^n$, for every distribution $\cal{D}$ supported on $\{x^1,\dots,x^s\}$, our algorithm efficiently recovers ${\cal D}$ up to total variation distance $\epsilon$ with high probability, given access to independent traces of independent draws from $\cal{D}$. The algorithm runs in time poly$(n,s,1/\epsilon)$ and its sample complexity is poly$(s,1/\epsilon,\exp(\log^{1/3}n)).$ This polynomial dependence on the support size $s$ is in sharp contrast with the \emph{worst-case} version (when $x^1,\dots,x^s$ may be any strings in $\{0,1\}^n$), in which the sample complexity of the most efficient known algorithm \cite{BCFSS19} is doubly exponential in $s$.

Includes members:
  Member "beyond trace reconstruction population recovery from the deletion channel":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "coded trace reconstruction")
  Member "trace reconstruction generalized and parameterized":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "coded trace reconstruction")
  Member "sharp bounds for population recovery":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "beyond trace reconstruction population recovery from the deletion channel")
  Member "average case reconstruction for the deletion channel subpolynomially many traces suffice":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "the error probability of maximum likelihood decoding over two deletion channels")
  Member "noisy population recovery in polynomial time":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "beyond trace reconstruction population recovery from the deletion channel")
  Member "optimal mean based algorithms for trace reconstruction":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "the error probability of maximum likelihood decoding over two deletion channels")
  Member "a polynomial time algorithm for lossy population recovery":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "beyond trace reconstruction population recovery from the deletion channel")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)