human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "nas bench 102 extending the scope of reproducible neural architecture search"):
  Abstract: Neural architecture search (NAS) has achieved breakthrough success in a great number of applications in the past few years. It could be time to take a step back and analyze the good and bad aspects in the field of NAS. A variety of algorithms search architectures under different search space. These searched architectures are trained using different setups, e.g., hyper-parameters, data augmentation, regularization. This raises a comparability problem when comparing the performance of various NAS algorithms. NAS-Bench-101 has shown success to alleviate this problem. In this work, we propose an extension to NAS-Bench-101: NAS-Bench-102 with a different search space, results on multiple datasets, and more diagnostic information. NAS-Bench-102 has a fixed search space and provides a unified benchmark for almost any up-to-date NAS algorithms. The design of our search space is inspired from the one used in the most popular cell-based searching algorithms, where a cell is represented as a DAG. Each edge here is associated with an operation selected from a predefined operation set. For it to be applicable for all NAS algorithms, the search space defined in NAS-Bench-102 includes all possible architectures generated by 4 nodes and 5 associated operation options, which results in 15,625 candidates in total. The training log and the performance for each architecture candidate are provided for three datasets. This allows researchers to avoid unnecessary repetitive training for selected candidate and focus solely on the search algorithm itself. The training time saved for every candidate also largely improves the efficiency of many methods. We provide additional diagnostic information such as fine-grained loss and accuracy, which can give inspirations to new designs of NAS algorithms. In further support, we have analyzed it from many aspects and benchmarked 10 recent NAS algorithms.

Includes members:
  Member "nas bench 1shot1 benchmarking and dissecting one shot neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "stabilizing differentiable architecture search via perturbation based regularization")
  Member "random search and reproducibility for neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "automl zero evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch")
  Member "one shot neural architecture search via self evaluated template network":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "nas bench 201 extending the scope of reproducible neural architecture search")
  Member "searching for a robust neural architecture in four gpu hours":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "learning architectures for binary networks")
  Member "tabular benchmarks for joint architecture and hyperparameter optimization":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategies")
  Member "dropblock a regularization method for convolutional networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "on feature normalization and data augmentation")
  Member "graph hypernetworks for neural architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "learning architectures for binary networks")
  Member "regularized evolution for image classifier architecture search":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "searching for winograd aware quantized networks")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)