human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "dependability modeling and optimization of triple modular redundancy partitioning for sram based fpgas"):
  Abstract: Abstract   SRAM-based FPGAs are popular in the aerospace industry for their field programmability and low cost. However, they suffer from cosmic radiation-induced Single Event Upsets (SEUs). Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) is a well-known technique to mitigate SEUs in FPGAs that is often used with another SEU mitigation technique known as configuration scrubbing. Traditional TMR provides protection against a single fault at a time, while partitioned TMR provides improved reliability and availability. In this paper, we present a methodology to analyze TMR partitioning at early design stage using probabilistic model checking. The proposed formal model can capture both single and multiple-cell upset scenarios, regardless of any assumption of equal partition sizes. Starting with a high-level description of a design, a Markov model is constructed from the Data Flow Graph (DFG) using a specified number of partitions, a component characterization library and a user defined scrub rate. Such a model and exhaustive analysis captures all the considered failures and repairs possible in the system within the radiation environment. Various reliability and availability properties are then verified automatically using the PRISM model checker exploring the relationship between the scrub frequency and the number of TMR partitions required to meet the design requirements. Also, the reported results show that based on a known voter failure rate, it is possible to find an optimal number of partitions at early design stages using our proposed method.

Includes members:
  Member "formal analysis of seu mitigation for early dependability and performability analysis of fpga based space applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "maintenance of smart buildings using fault trees")
  Member "a fault tolerance improved majority voter for tmr system architectures":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "performance comparison of some synchronous adders")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing)