human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "the privacy blanket of the shuffle model"):
  Abstract: This work studies differential privacy in the context of the recently proposed shuffle model. Unlike in the local model, where the server collecting privatized data from users can track back an input to a specific user, in the shuffle model users submit their privatized inputs to a server anonymously. This setup yields a trust model which sits in between the classical curator and local models for differential privacy. The shuffle model is the core idea in the Encode, Shuffle, Analyze (ESA) model introduced by Bittau et al. (SOPS 2017). Recent work by Cheu et al. (EUROCRYPT 2019) analyzes the differential privacy properties of the shuffle model and shows that in some cases shuffled protocols provide strictly better accuracy than local protocols. Additionally, Erlingsson et al. (SODA 2019) provide a privacy amplification bound quantifying the level of curator differential privacy achieved by the shuffle model in terms of the local differential privacy of the randomizer used by each user. In this context, we make three contributions. First, we provide an optimal single message protocol for summation of real numbers in the shuffle model. Our protocol is very simple and has better accuracy and communication than the protocols for this same problem proposed by Cheu et al. Optimality of this protocol follows from our second contribution, a new lower bound for the accuracy of private protocols for summation of real numbers in the shuffle model. The third contribution is a new amplification bound for analyzing the privacy of protocols in the shuffle model in terms of the privacy provided by the corresponding local randomizer. Our amplification bound generalizes the results by Erlingsson et al. to a wider range of parameters, and provides a whole family of methods to analyze privacy amplification in the shuffle model.

Includes members:
  Member "the role of interactivity in local differential privacy":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")
  Member "improving the gaussian mechanism for differential privacy analytical calibration and optimal denoising":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "a better bound gives a hundred rounds enhanced privacy guarantees via f divergences")
  Member "amplification by shuffling from local to central differential privacy via anonymity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages")
  Member "privacy amplification by subsampling tight analyses via couplings and divergences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "encode shuffle analyze privacy revisited formalizations and empirical evaluation")
  Member "privacy amplification by iteration":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "a better bound gives a hundred rounds enhanced privacy guarantees via f divergences")
  Member "distributed differential privacy via shuffling":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages")
  Member "prochlo strong privacy for analytics in the crowd":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages")
  Member "collecting telemetry data privately":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "locally private hypothesis selection")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)