human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "fully dynamic planarity testing in polylogarithmic time"):
  Abstract: Given a dynamic graph subject to insertions and deletions of edges, a natural question is whether the graph presently admits a planar embedding. We give a deterministic fully-dynamic algorithm for general graphs, running in amortized $O(\log^3 n)$ time per edge insertion or deletion, that maintains a bit indicating whether or not the graph is presently planar. This is an exponential improvement over the previous best algorithm [Eppstein, Galil, Italiano, Spencer, 1996] which spends amortized $O(\sqrt{n})$ time per update.

Includes members:
  Member "dynamic planar embeddings of dynamic graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "worst case polylog incremental spqr trees embeddings planarity and triconnectivity")
  Member "popular conjectures as a barrier for dynamic planar graph algorithms":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "rounding dynamic matchings against an adaptive adversary")
  Member "popular conjectures imply strong lower bounds for dynamic problems":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "new algorithms and hardness for incremental single source shortest paths in directed graphs")
  Member "faster deterministic fully dynamic graph connectivity":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "deterministic algorithms for decremental approximate shortest paths faster and simpler")
  Member "dynamic generators of topologically embedded graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "obtaining a canonical polygonal schema from a greedy homotopy basis with minimal mesh refinement")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms)