human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "learning robust representations with graph denoising policy network"):
  Abstract: Graph representation learning, aiming to learn low-dimensional representations which capture the geometric dependencies between nodes in the original graph, has gained increasing popularity in a variety of graph analysis tasks, including node classification and link prediction. Existing representation learning methods based on graph neural networks and their variants rely on the aggregation of neighborhood information, which makes it sensitive to noises in the graph. In this paper, we propose Graph Denoising Policy Network (short for GDPNet) to learn robust representations from noisy graph data through reinforcement learning. GDPNet first selects signal neighborhoods for each node, and then aggregates the information from the selected neighborhoods to learn node representations for the down-stream tasks. Specifically, in the signal neighborhood selection phase, GDPNet optimizes the neighborhood for each target node by formulating the process of removing noisy neighborhoods as a Markov decision process and learning a policy with task-specific rewards received from the representation learning phase. In the representation learning phase, GDPNet aggregates features from signal neighbors to generate node representations for down-stream tasks, and provides task-specific rewards to the signal neighbor selection phase. These two phases are jointly trained to select optimal sets of neighbors for target nodes with maximum cumulative task-specific rewards, and to learn robust representations for nodes. Experimental results on node classification task demonstrate the effectiveness of GDNet, outperforming the state-of-the-art graph representation learning methods on several well-studied datasets. Additionally, GDPNet is mathematically equivalent to solving the submodular maximizing problem, which theoretically guarantees the best approximation to the optimal solution with GDPNet.

Includes members:
  Member "graph neural networks a review of methods and applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "natural language qa approaches using reasoning with external knowledge")
  Member "adversarial attack on graph structured data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "transferring robustness for graph neural network against poisoning attacks")
  Member "network embedding as matrix factorization unifying deepwalk line pte and node2vec":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "adversarial attacks and defenses on graphs a review and empirical study")
  Member "gaan gated attention networks for learning on large and spatiotemporal graphs":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "transferring robustness for graph neural network against poisoning attacks")
  Member "adaptive sampling towards fast graph representation learning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "spectral graph attention network")
  Member "graph embedding techniques applications and performance a survey":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "relatext exploiting visual relationships for arbitrary shaped scene text detection with graph convolutional networks")
  Member "fastgcn fast learning with graph convolutional networks via importance sampling":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "spectral graph attention network")
  Member "representation learning on graphs methods and applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "learning to segment 3d point clouds in 2d image space")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)