human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "on exact computation with an infinitely wide neural net"):
  Abstract: How well does a classic deep net architecture like AlexNet or VGG19 classify on a standard dataset such as CIFAR-10 when its width --- namely, number of channels in convolutional layers, and number of nodes in fully-connected internal layers --- is allowed to increase to infinity? Such questions have come to the forefront in the quest to theoretically understand deep learning and its mysteries about optimization and generalization. They also connect deep learning to notions such as Gaussian processes and kernels. A recent paper [Jacot et al., 2018] introduced the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) which captures the behavior of fully-connected deep nets in the infinite width limit trained by gradient descent; this object was implicit in some other recent papers. An attraction of such ideas is that a pure kernel-based method is used to capture the power of a fully-trained deep net of infinite width. #R##N#The current paper gives the first efficient exact algorithm for computing the extension of NTK to convolutional neural nets, which we call Convolutional NTK (CNTK), as well as an efficient GPU implementation of this algorithm. This results in a significant new benchmark for the performance of a pure kernel-based method on CIFAR-10, being $10\%$ higher than the methods reported in [Novak et al., 2019], and only $6\%$ lower than the performance of the corresponding finite deep net architecture (once batch normalization, etc. are turned off). Theoretically, we also give the first non-asymptotic proof showing that a fully-trained sufficiently wide net is indeed equivalent to the kernel regression predictor using NTK.

Includes members:
  Member "scaling limits of wide neural networks with weight sharing gaussian process behavior gradient independence and neural tangent kernel derivation":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "width provably matters in optimization for deep linear neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "fine grained analysis of optimization and generalization for overparameterized two layer neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "disentangling adaptive gradient methods from learning rates")
  Member "a generalization theory of gradient descent for learning over parameterized deep relu networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "convergence of end to end training in deep unsupervised contrasitive learning")
  Member "learning and generalization in overparameterized neural networks going beyond two layers":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "gradient descent finds global minima of deep neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "learning overparameterized neural networks via stochastic gradient descent on structured data":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "backward feature correction how deep learning performs deep learning")
  Member "deep convolutional gaussian processes":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "scaling limits of wide neural networks with weight sharing gaussian process behavior gradient independence and neural tangent kernel derivation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)