human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "separating k player from t player one way communication with applications to data streams"):
  Abstract: In a $k$-party communication problem, the $k$ players with inputs $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_k$, respectively, want to evaluate a function $f(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_k)$ using as little communication as possible. We consider the message-passing model, in which the inputs are partitioned in an arbitrary, possibly worst-case manner, among a smaller number $t$ of players ($t<k$). The $t$-player communication cost of computing $f$ can only be smaller than the $k$-player communication cost, since the $t$ players can trivially simulate the $k$-player protocol. But how much smaller can it be? We study deterministic and randomized protocols in the one-way model, and provide separations for product input distributions, which are optimal for low error probability protocols. We also provide much stronger separations when the input distribution is non-product. #R##N#A key application of our results is in proving lower bounds for data stream algorithms. In particular, we give an optimal $\Omega(\varepsilon^{-2}\log(N) \log \log(mM))$ bits of space lower bound for the fundamental problem of $(1\pm\varepsilon)$-approximating the number $\|x\|_0$ of non-zero entries of an $n$-dimensional vector $x$ after $m$ updates each of magnitude $M$, and with success probability $\ge 2/3$, in a strict turnstile stream. Our result matches the best known upper bound when $\varepsilon\ge 1/\mathsf{polylog}(mM)$. It also improves on the prior $\Omega(\varepsilon^{-2}\log(mM) )$ lower bound and separates the complexity of approximating $L_0$ from approximating the $p$-norm $L_p$ for $p$ bounded away from $0$, since the latter has an $O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log (mM))$ bit upper bound.

Includes members:
  Member "tight bounds for distributed functional monitoring":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "towards optimal moment estimation in streaming and distributed models")
  Member "fast moment estimation in data streams in optimal space":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "solving tall dense linear programs in nearly linear time")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.CC(Computational Complexity)