human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "pruning filters while training for efficiently optimizing deep learning networks"):
  Abstract: Modern deep networks have millions to billions of parameters, which leads to high memory and energy requirements during training as well as during inference on resource-constrained edge devices. Consequently, pruning techniques have been proposed that remove less significant weights in deep networks, thereby reducing their memory and computational requirements. Pruning is usually performed after training the original network, and is followed by further retraining to compensate for the accuracy loss incurred during pruning. The prune-and-retrain procedure is repeated iteratively until an optimum tradeoff between accuracy and efficiency is reached. However, such iterative retraining adds to the overall training complexity of the network. In this work, we propose a dynamic pruning-while-training procedure, wherein we prune filters of the convolutional layers of a deep network during training itself, thereby precluding the need for separate retraining. We evaluate our dynamic pruning-while-training approach with three different pre-existing pruning strategies, viz. mean activation-based pruning, random pruning, and L1 normalization-based pruning. Our results for VGG-16 trained on CIFAR10 shows that L1 normalization provides the best performance among all the techniques explored in this work with less than 1% drop in accuracy after pruning 80% of the filters compared to the original network. We further evaluated the L1 normalization based pruning mechanism on CIFAR100. Results indicate that pruning while training yields a compressed network with almost no accuracy loss after pruning 50% of the filters compared to the original network and ~5% loss for high pruning rates (>80%). The proposed pruning methodology yields 41% reduction in the number of computations and memory accesses during training for CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and ImageNet compared to training with retraining for 10 epochs .

Includes members:
  Member "pca driven hybrid network design for enabling intelligence at the edge":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "pbgen partial binarization of deconvolution based generators for edge intelligence")
  Member "recovering from random pruning on the plasticity of deep convolutional neural networks":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "reducing transformer depth on demand with structured dropout")
  Member "rethinking the value of network pruning":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "mobilenets efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "dorefa net training low bitwidth convolutional neural networks with low bitwidth gradients":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "pruning convolutional neural networks for resource efficient inference":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "deep compression compressing deep neural networks with pruning trained quantization and huffman coding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")
  Member "deep residual learning for image recognition":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "discrimination aware network pruning for deep model compression")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.LG(Machine Learning)