human: Given a hyperedge-centered hypergraph: <hypergraph>, where the center hyperedge is induced by one source paper and its member nodes are the cited papers.

Details of the hypergraph:
Center hyperedge (induced by source paper "why does my model fail contrastive local explanations for retail forecasting"):
  Abstract: In various business settings, there is an interest in using more complex machine learning techniques for sales forecasting. It is difficult to convince analysts, along with their superiors, to adopt these techniques since the models are considered to be "black boxes," even if they perform better than current models in use. We examine the impact of contrastive explanations about large errors on users' attitudes towards a "black-box'" model. We propose an algorithm, Monte Carlo Bounds for Reasonable Predictions. Given a large error, MC-BRP determines (1) feature values that would result in a reasonable prediction, and (2) general trends between each feature and the target, both based on Monte Carlo simulations. We evaluate on a real dataset with real users by conducting a user study with 75 participants to determine if explanations generated by MC-BRP help users understand why a prediction results in a large error, and if this promotes trust in an automatically-learned model. Our study shows that users are able to answer objective questions about the model's predictions with overall 81.1% accuracy when provided with these contrastive explanations. We show that users who saw MC-BRP explanations understand why the model makes large errors in predictions significantly more than users in the control group. We also conduct an in-depth analysis on the difference in attitudes between Practitioners and Researchers, and confirm that our results hold when conditioning on the users' background.

Includes members:
  Member "efficient search for diverse coherent explanations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-1 (induced by source paper "why is chicago deceptive towards building model driven tutorials for humans")
  Member "explainable ai for trees from local explanations to global understanding":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-2 (induced by source paper "vulnerabilities of connectionist ai applications evaluation and defence")
  Member "grounding visual explanations":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-3 (induced by source paper "explaining with counter visual attributes and examples")
  Member "explanations based on the missing towards contrastive explanations with pertinent negatives":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-4 (induced by source paper "questioning the ai informing design practices for explainable ai user experiences")
  Member "a survey of methods for explaining black box models":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-5 (induced by source paper "vice visual counterfactual explanations for machine learning models")
  Member "finding influential training samples for gradient boosted decision trees":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-6 (induced by source paper "less is better unweighted data subsampling via influence function")
  Member "explanation in artificial intelligence insights from the social sciences":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-7 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")
  Member "counterfactual explanations without opening the black box automated decisions and the gdpr":
    also connected through other hyperedges:
      - Hyperedge HE-8 (induced by source paper "causal interpretability for machine learning problems methods and evaluation")

Question: Please tell me which class the source paper belongs to. The 40 classes are: cs.NA(Numerical Analysis), cs.MM(Multimedia), cs.LO(Logic in Computer Science), cs.CY(Computers and Society), cs.CR(Cryptography and Security), cs.DC(Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing), cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction), cs.CE(Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science), cs.NI(Networking and Internet Architecture), cs.CC(Computational Complexity), cs.AI(Artificial Intelligence), cs.MA(Multiagent Systems), cs.GL(General Literature), cs.NE(Neural and Evolutionary Computing), cs.SC(Symbolic Computation), cs.AR(Hardware Architecture), cs.CV(Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition), cs.GR(Graphics), cs.ET(Emerging Technologies), cs.SY(Systems and Control), cs.CG(Computational Geometry), cs.OH(Other Computer Science), cs.PL(Programming Languages), cs.SE(Software Engineering), cs.LG(Machine Learning), cs.SD(Sound), cs.SI(Social and Information Networks), cs.RO(Robotics), cs.IT(Information Theory), cs.PF(Performance), cs.CL(Computation and Language), cs.IR(Information Retrieval), cs.MS(Mathematical Software), cs.FL(Formal Languages and Automata Theory), cs.DS(Data Structures and Algorithms), cs.OS(Operating Systems), cs.GT(Computer Science and Game Theory), cs.DB(Databases), cs.DL(Digital Libraries), cs.DM(Discrete Mathematics). Directly output the class name.

gpt: cs.HC(Human-Computer Interaction)