MehdiHosseiniMoghadam/ConvFinQA huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index .
the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested .
market performance .

company / index
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
teleflex incorporated
100
102
119
142
190
235
s&p 500 index
100
115
117
136
180
205
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index
100
97
97
113
144
182

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 97 97 113 144 182 .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 2%

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 16.7%
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively .
this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance .
the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2007 and ending december 31 , 2012 .
our peer group consists of the following ten companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ( bp ) ; cvr energy , inc. ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; phillips 66 ( psx ) ; royal dutch shell plc ( rds ) ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc .
our peer group previously included chevron corporation ( cvx ) and exxon mobil corporation ( xom ) but they were replaced with bp , psx , and rds .
in 2012 , psx became an independent downstream energy company and was added to our peer group .
cvx and xom were replaced with bp and rds as they were viewed as having operations that more closely aligned with our core businesses .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .

12/2007
12/2008
12/2009
12/2010
12/2011
12/2012
valero common stock
$ 100.00
$ 31.45
$ 25.09
$ 35.01
$ 32.26
$ 53.61
s&p 500
100.00
63.00
79.67
91.67
93.61
108.59
old peer group
100.00
80.98
76.54
88.41
104.33
111.11
new peer group
100.00
66.27
86.87
72.84
74.70
76.89

____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 .
201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012. .

Question: what was the percentage growth of the s&p 500 common stock from 2007 to 2012
Answer: 8.59%

Question: what was the biggest decline , in percentage , from 2007-2008 , among the four groups?
Answer: 68.55%
and $ 19 million of these expenses in 2011 and 2010 , respectively , with the remaining expense unallocated .
the company financed the acquisition with the proceeds from a $ 1.0 billion three-year term loan credit facility , $ 1.5 billion in unsecured notes , and the issuance of 61 million shares of aon common stock .
in addition , as part of the consideration , certain outstanding hewitt stock options were converted into options to purchase 4.5 million shares of aon common stock .
these items are detailed further in note 8 2018 2018debt 2019 2019 and note 11 2018 2018stockholders 2019 equity 2019 2019 .
the transaction has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting which requires , among other things , that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date .
the following table summarizes the amounts recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date ( in millions ) : amounts recorded as of the acquisition .

amountsrecorded as ofthe acquisitiondate
working capital ( 1 )
$ 348
property equipment and capitalized software
297
identifiable intangible assets:
customer relationships
1800
trademarks
890
technology
215
other noncurrent assets ( 2 )
344
long-term debt
346
other noncurrent liabilities ( 3 )
360
net deferred tax liability ( 4 )
1021
net assets acquired
2167
goodwill
2765
total consideration transferred
$ 4932

( 1 ) includes cash and cash equivalents , short-term investments , client receivables , other current assets , accounts payable and other current liabilities .
( 2 ) includes primarily deferred contract costs and long-term investments .
( 3 ) includes primarily unfavorable lease obligations and deferred contract revenues .
( 4 ) included in other current assets ( $ 31 million ) , deferred tax assets ( $ 30 million ) , other current liabilities ( $ 7 million ) and deferred tax liabilities ( $ 1.1 billion ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of financial position .
the acquired customer relationships are being amortized over a weighted average life of 12 years .
the technology asset is being amortized over 7 years and trademarks have been determined to have indefinite useful lives .
goodwill is calculated as the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired and represents the synergies and other benefits that are expected to arise from combining the operations of hewitt with the operations of aon , and the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized .
goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes .
a single estimate of fair value results from a complex series of the company 2019s judgments about future events and uncertainties and relies heavily on estimates and assumptions .
the company 2019s .

Question: what is the total value of identified intangible assets?
Answer: 2905
notes to consolidated financial statements the firm permanently reinvests eligible earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and , accordingly , does not accrue any u.s .
income taxes that would arise if such earnings were repatriated .
as of december 2012 and december 2011 , this policy resulted in an unrecognized net deferred tax liability of $ 3.75 billion and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , attributable to reinvested earnings of $ 21.69 billion and $ 20.63 billion , respectively .
unrecognized tax benefits the firm recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position .
a position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized on settlement .
a liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements .
as of december 2012 and december 2011 , the accrued liability for interest expense related to income tax matters and income tax penalties was $ 374 million and $ 233 million , respectively .
the firm recognized $ 95 million , $ 21 million and $ 28 million of interest and income tax penalties for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .
it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to december 2012 due to potential audit settlements , however , at this time it is not possible to estimate any potential change .
the table below presents the changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits .
this liability is included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 17 for further information. .

in millions
as of december 2012
as of december 2011
as of december 2010
balance beginning of year
$ 1887
$ 2081
$ 1925
increases based on tax positions related to the current year
190
171
171
increases based on tax positions related to prior years
336
278
162
decreases related to tax positions of prior years
-109 ( 109 )
-41 ( 41 )
-104 ( 104 )
decreases related to settlements
-35 ( 35 )
-638 ( 638 )
-128 ( 128 )
acquisitions/ ( dispositions )
-47 ( 47 )
47
56
exchange rate fluctuations
15
-11 ( 11 )
-1 ( 1 )
balance end of year
$ 2237
$ 1887
$ 2081
related deferred income tax asset1
685
569
972
net unrecognized tax benefit2
$ 1552
$ 1318
$ 1109

related deferred income tax asset 1 685 569 972 net unrecognized tax benefit 2 $ 1552 $ 1318 $ 1109 1 .
included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 .
2 .
if recognized , the net tax benefit would reduce the firm 2019s effective income tax rate .
194 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .

Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2012 compare to 2011?
Answer: 17.8%

Question: what is the percentage change in the net unrecognized tax benefit in 2011 compare to 2010?
Answer: 18.8%
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index .

date
pmi
pmi compensation survey group ( 12 )
s&p 500 index
december 31 2010
$ 100.00
$ 100.00
$ 100.00
december 31 2011
$ 139.80
$ 114.10
$ 102.10
december 31 2012
$ 154.60
$ 128.00
$ 118.50
december 31 2013
$ 167.70
$ 163.60
$ 156.80
december 31 2014
$ 164.20
$ 170.10
$ 178.30
december 31 2015
$ 186.20
$ 179.20
$ 180.80

( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc .
( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc .
( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc .
( nasdaq : krft ) .
international , inc .
was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint .
the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc .
and kraft foods group , inc .
on october 2 , 2012 .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?
Answer: 5.40%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?
Answer: 86.20%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in s&p 500 in 2010 and liquidated in 2011?
Answer: 2.1%
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 .
this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period .
the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any .
dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar .
the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved. .

10/28/2012
10/27/2013
10/26/2014
10/25/2015
10/30/2016
10/29/2017
applied materials
100.00
171.03
207.01
165.34
293.64
586.91
s&p 500 index
100.00
127.18
149.14
156.89
163.97
202.72
rdg semiconductor composite index
100.00
131.94
167.25
160.80
193.36
288.96

dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share .
applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders .
10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc .
s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: what is the roi in applied materials if the investment was made in 2012 and sold in 2015?
Answer: 65.3%

Question: what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made in 2012 and sold in 2015?
Answer: 56.9%
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

balance december 31 2003
$ 514177
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense
82551
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property
-1390 ( 1390 )
balance december 31 2004
595338
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense
83656
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property
-15244 ( 15244 )
balance december 31 2005
663750
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense
89564
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property
-12807 ( 12807 )
balance december 31 2006
$ 740507

.

Question: what is the average of the deductions during the period of 2003-2006?
Answer: 9813.66
item 6 .
selected financial data the following table represents our selected financial data .
the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this report .
the table below reflects immaterial error corrections discussed in note 2 : summary of significant accounting policies in item 8. .

( $ in millions except per share amounts )
year ended december 31 2012
year ended december 31 2011
year ended december 31 2010
year ended december 31 2009
year ended december 31 2008
sales and service revenues
$ 6708
$ 6575
$ 6723
$ 6292
$ 6189
goodwill impairment
2014
290
2014
2014
2465
operating income ( loss )
358
100
241
203
-2332 ( 2332 )
net earnings ( loss )
146
-100 ( 100 )
131
119
-2397 ( 2397 )
total assets
6392
6069
5270
5097
4821
long-term debt ( 1 )
1779
1830
105
283
283
total long-term obligations
4341
3838
1637
1708
1823
free cash flow ( 2 )
170
331
168
-269 ( 269 )
121
dividends declared per share
$ 0.10
$ 2014
$ 2014
$ 2014
$ 2014
basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )
$ 2.96
$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )
$ 2.68
$ 2.44
$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )
diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 )
$ 2.91
$ -2.05 ( 2.05 )
$ 2.68
$ 2.44
$ -49.14 ( 49.14 )

basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.96 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.91 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities .
( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures .
see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure .
( 3 ) on march 30 , 2011 , the record date of the stock distribution associated with the spin-off from northrop grumman , approximately 48.8 million shares of $ 0.01 par value hii common stock were distributed to northrop grumman stockholders .
this share amount was utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings ( loss ) per share for the three months ended march 31 , 2011 , and all prior periods , as no common stock of the company existed prior to march 30 , 2011 , and the impact of dilutive securities in the three month period ended march 31 , 2011 , was not meaningful. .

Question: what was the net increase in total assets during the 5 year period ?
Answer: 1571000000
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc .
under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing .
the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group .
the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc .
the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims .
many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking .
the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any .
the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only .
they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock .
s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

5/9/2013
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
q
$ 100
$ 110
$ 140
$ 163
$ 181
peer group
$ 100
$ 116
$ 143
$ 151
$ 143
s&p 500
$ 100
$ 114
$ 127
$ 126
$ 138

item 6 .
selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 if the investment is sold at the end of year 2014?
Answer: 27%

Question: in 2013 what was the anticipated percentage growth in the stock performance for the peer group in 2014
Answer: 43%

Question: what is the return on investment for q if the investment is sold at the end of year 2014?
Answer: 40%
apple inc .
| 2018 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index for the five years ended september 29 , 2018 .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index as of the market close on september 27 , 2013 .
note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
* $ 100 invested on september 27 , 2013 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes .
copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved .
copyright a9 2018 s&p dow jones indices llc , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved .
september september september september september september .

september2013
september2014
september2015
september2016
september2017
september2018
apple inc .
$ 100
$ 149
$ 173
$ 174
$ 242
$ 359
s&p 500 index
$ 100
$ 120
$ 119
$ 137
$ 163
$ 192
s&p information technology index
$ 100
$ 129
$ 132
$ 162
$ 209
$ 275
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index
$ 100
$ 130
$ 130
$ 159
$ 203
$ 266

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for apple inc . for the five year period ended september 2018?
Answer: 259%
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

december 31 ( in dollars )
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
jpmorgan chase
$ 100.00
$ 80.03
$ 108.98
$ 148.98
$ 163.71
$ 177.40
kbw bank index
100.00
76.82
102.19
140.77
153.96
154.71
s&p financial index
100.00
82.94
106.78
144.79
166.76
164.15
s&p 500 index
100.00
102.11
118.44
156.78
178.22
180.67

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what was the 5 year return of the s&p 500 index?
Answer: 80.67%

Question: what was the 5 year return of the s&p financial index?
Answer: 64.15%