MehdiHosseiniMoghadam/ConvFinQA huggingface dataset:
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

12/31/2007
12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
lkq corporation
$ 100
$ 55
$ 93
$ 108
$ 143
$ 201
nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index
$ 100
$ 59
$ 86
$ 100
$ 98
$ 114
peer group
$ 100
$ 83
$ 100
$ 139
$ 187
$ 210

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .
information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the percentage of cumulative return for lkq corporation for the five years ended 12/31/2012?
Answer: 101%

Question: what was the difference in percentage of cumulative return for lkq corporation and the peer group for the five years ended 12/31/2012?
Answer: -9%
dividends for a summary of the cash dividends paid on citi 2019s outstanding common stock during 2009 and 2010 , see note 33 to the consolidated financial statements .
for so long as the u.s .
government holds any citigroup trust preferred securities acquired pursuant to the exchange offers consummated in 2009 , citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $ 0.01 per quarter , subject to certain customary exceptions .
further , any dividend on citi 2019s outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with citi 2019s obligations to any remaining outstanding citigroup preferred stock .
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2010 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested .
citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 .

december 31,
citigroup
s&p 500 index
s&p financial index
2006
119.55
115.79
119.19
2007
66.10
122.15
96.98
2008
15.88
76.96
43.34
2009
7.85
97.33
50.80
2010
11.22
111.99
56.96

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return between cititgroup's common stock and the s&p 500 index for the five year period ending 2010?

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for cititgroup's common stock for the five year period ending 2010?
Answer: -88.78%
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index .
the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested .
market performance .

company / index
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
teleflex incorporated
100
117
138
185
229
266
s&p 500 index
100
102
118
157
178
181
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index
100
99
116
148
187
199

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 99 116 148 187 199 .

Question: based on the table , how much percent did the healthcare sector outperform the overall market in this 5 year period?
Answer: 18%

Question: what is the total return of an investment of $ 1000000 in s&p 500 index in 2010 and sold in 2015?
Answer: 810000
apple inc .
| 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 .
note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
* $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes .
copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial .
all rights reserved .
copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co .
all rights reserved .
september september september september september september .

september2011
september2012
september2013
september2014
september2015
september2016
apple inc .
$ 100
$ 166
$ 123
$ 183
$ 212
$ 213
s&p 500 index
$ 100
$ 130
$ 155
$ 186
$ 185
$ 213
s&p information technology index
$ 100
$ 132
$ 142
$ 183
$ 187
$ 230
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index
$ 100
$ 130
$ 137
$ 178
$ 177
$ 217

.

Question: what was the 1 year return of apple inc . from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 49%

Question: what is the 6 year return of the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index?
Answer: 117%
value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 .
gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively .
gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively .
gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 .
there were no gross realized losses for 2003 .
maturities stated are effective maturities .
f .
restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash .
at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements .
g .
property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively .
in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized .
there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment .
additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated .
the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 .
h .
investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc .
( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 .
the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .

2005
2004
furniture and equipment
$ 98387
$ 90893
leasehold improvements
66318
65294
computers
18971
18421
software
18683
16411
total property and equipment gross
202359
191019
less accumulated depreciation and amortization
147826
126794
total property and equipment net
$ 54533
$ 64225

.

Question: what is the percent change in net loss on disposal of assets between 2004 and 2005?
Answer: 700%

Question: what was the percentage increase in the carrying vale of the furniture and equipment from 2004 to 2005
Answer: 8.3%
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

measurement pointdecember 31
the priceline group inc .
nasdaqcomposite index
s&p 500index
rdg internetcomposite
2010
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
2011
117.06
100.53
102.11
102.11
2012
155.27
116.92
118.45
122.23
2013
290.93
166.19
156.82
199.42
2014
285.37
188.78
178.29
195.42
2015
319.10
199.95
180.75
267.25

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage change between the priceline group inc . and the s&p 500index for the five years ended 2015?
Answer: 138.35%

Question: what was the percent of the growth of the the priceline group inc . from 2014 to 2015
Answer: 11.8%
entergy gulf states , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis .

( in millions )
2003 net revenue
$ 1110.1
volume/weather
26.7
net wholesale revenue
13.0
summer capacity charges
5.5
price applied to unbilled sales
4.8
fuel recovery revenues
-14.2 ( 14.2 )
other
3.9
2004 net revenue
$ 1149.8

the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector .
billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors .
the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers .
summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 .
the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .
the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales .
fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates .
entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds .
these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions .
the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above .
other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 .
the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .
2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 3.58%

Question: what portion of the net change in net revenue during 2004 is due to the change in volume/weather for entergy gulf states , inc?
Answer: 67.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy gulf states , inc?
Answer: 3.6%
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period .
the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 .
it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends .
the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies .
the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
state street corporation
$ 100
$ 159
$ 172
$ 148
$ 178
$ 227
s&p 500 index
100
132
151
153
171
208
s&p financial index
100
136
156
154
189
230
kbw bank index
100
138
151
151
195
231

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment is s&p500 index from 2012 to 2015?
Answer: 53%

Question: what is the roi of an investment is state street corporation from 2012 to 2015?
Answer: 48%

Question: what percent returns did shareholders of state street corporation
Answer: 127%
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward .
unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : .

2009
2008
balance at january 1
$ 86
$ 70
additions based on tax positions related to the current year
2
5
additions for tax positions of prior years
5
12
reductions for tax positions of prior years
-11 ( 11 )
-11 ( 11 )
settlements
-10 ( 10 )
-4 ( 4 )
lapse of statute of limitations
-3 ( 3 )
-1 ( 1 )
acquisitions
6
21
foreign currency translation
2
-6 ( 6 )
balance at december 31
$ 77
$ 86

as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized .
aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months .
the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes .
aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .
aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 .
as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively .
aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s .
federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions .
aon has substantially concluded all u.s .
federal income tax matters for years through 2006 .
material u.s .
state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 .
aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .

Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the increase observed in the liability for interest?
Answer: 28.57%

Question: what was the percent of the change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2008 to 2009
Answer: -10.5%
on may 20 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 600 million of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior notes due may 2045 .
the 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) notes due may 2045 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation .
we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes .
on september 30 , 2015 , $ 600 million of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior notes issued by aon corporation matured and were repaid .
on november 13 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 400 million of 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) senior notes due march 2021 .
the 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) notes due march 2021 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation .
we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes .
credit facilities as of december 31 , 2015 , we had two committed credit facilities outstanding : our $ 400 million u.s .
credit facility expiring in march 2017 ( the "2017 facility" ) and $ 900 million multi-currency u.s .
credit facility expiring in february 2020 ( the "2020 facility" ) .
the 2020 facility was entered into on february 2 , 2015 and replaced the previous 20ac650 million european credit facility .
each of these facilities is intended to support our commercial paper obligations and our general working capital needs .
in addition , each of these facilities includes customary representations , warranties and covenants , including financial covenants that require us to maintain specified ratios of adjusted consolidated ebitda to consolidated interest expense and consolidated debt to adjusted consolidated ebitda , tested quarterly .
at december 31 , 2015 , we did not have borrowings under either the 2017 facility or the 2020 facility , and we were in compliance with the financial covenants and all other covenants contained therein during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2015 .
effective february 2 , 2016 , the 2020 facility terms were extended for 1 year and will expire in february 2021 our total debt-to-ebitda ratio at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , is calculated as follows: .

years ended december 31,
2015
2014
net income
1422
1431
interest expense
273
255
income taxes
267
334
depreciation of fixed assets
229
242
amortization of intangible assets
314
352
total ebitda
2505
2614
total debt
5737
5582
total debt-to-ebitda ratio
2.3
2.1

we use ebitda , as defined by our financial covenants , as a non-gaap measure .
this supplemental information related to ebitda represents a measure not in accordance with u.s .
gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto .
shelf registration statement on september 3 , 2015 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the sec , registering the offer and sale from time to time of an indeterminate amount of , among other securities , debt securities , preference shares , class a ordinary shares and convertible securities .
our ability to access the market as a source of liquidity is dependent on investor demand , market conditions and other factors. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the interest expense from 2014 to 2015
Answer: 7.1%

Question: what is the ebit of aon for 2015?
Answer: 2062
part a0ii item a05 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201ctfx . 201d as of february 19 , 2019 , we had 473 holders of record of our common stock .
a substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are beneficial owners whose shares are held by brokers and other financial institutions for the accounts of beneficial owners .
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index .
the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested .
market performance .

company / index
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
teleflex incorporated
100
124
143
177
275
288
s&p 500 index
100
114
115
129
157
150
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index
100
126
134
142
186
213

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 126 134 142 186 213 .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 24%

Question: what was the percentage increase for teleflex incorporated's market performance from 2014-2015?
Answer: 15.32%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 15.3%
the company further presents total net 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure , net of deferred compensation investments and hedged investments , to reflect another gauge for investors as the economic impact of investments held pursuant to deferred compensation arrangements is substantially offset by a change in compensation expense and the impact of hedged investments is substantially mitigated by total return swap hedges .
carried interest capital allocations are excluded as there is no impact to blackrock 2019s stockholders 2019 equity until such amounts are realized as performance fees .
finally , the company 2019s regulatory investment in federal reserve bank stock , which is not subject to market or interest rate risk , is excluded from the company 2019s net economic investment exposure .
( dollar amounts in millions ) december 31 , december 31 .

( dollar amounts in millions )
december 31 2012
december 31 2011
total investments gaap
$ 1750
$ 1631
investments held by consolidated sponsored investmentfunds ( 1 )
-524 ( 524 )
-587 ( 587 )
net exposure to consolidated investment funds
430
475
total investments as adjusted
1656
1519
federal reserve bank stock ( 2 )
-89 ( 89 )
-328 ( 328 )
carried interest
-85 ( 85 )
-21 ( 21 )
deferred compensation investments
-62 ( 62 )
-65 ( 65 )
hedged investments
-209 ( 209 )
-43 ( 43 )
total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure
$ 1211
$ 1062

total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure .
.
.
$ 1211 $ 1062 ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , approximately $ 524 million and $ 587 million , respectively , of blackrock 2019s total gaap investments were maintained in sponsored investment funds that were deemed to be controlled by blackrock in accordance with gaap , and , therefore , are consolidated even though blackrock may not economically own a majority of such funds .
( 2 ) the decrease of $ 239 million related to a lower holding requirement of federal reserve bank stock held by blackrock institutional trust company , n.a .
( 201cbtc 201d ) .
total investments , as adjusted , at december 31 , 2012 increased $ 137 million from december 31 , 2011 , resulting from $ 765 million of purchases/capital contributions , $ 185 million from positive market valuations and earnings from equity method investments , and $ 64 million from net additional carried interest capital allocations , partially offset by $ 742 million of sales/maturities and $ 135 million of distributions representing return of capital and return on investments. .

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of total investments gaap from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 7.3%

Question: in 2012 , investments held by consolidated sponsored investment funds reduced the company's investment exposure by what percent?
Answer: 30.2%

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 14.0%