MehdiHosseiniMoghadam/ConvFinQA huggingface dataset:
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 .
it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested .
the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .
total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis .

12/31/2006
12/31/2007
12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
ball corporation
$ 100.00
$ 104.05
$ 97.04
$ 121.73
$ 161.39
$ 170.70
dj us containers & packaging
$ 100.00
$ 106.73
$ 66.91
$ 93.98
$ 110.23
$ 110.39
s&p 500
$ 100.00
$ 105.49
$ 66.46
$ 84.05
$ 96.71
$ 98.75

copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved .
( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company .
all rights reserved. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in ball corporation from 2006 to 2008?
Answer: 2.96%

Question: what is the roi of an investment in dj us containers & packaging from 2006 to 2008?
Answer: -33.1%
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
12/31/2017
united parcel service inc .
$ 100.00
$ 146.54
$ 159.23
$ 148.89
$ 182.70
$ 195.75
standard & poor 2019s 500 index
$ 100.00
$ 132.38
$ 150.49
$ 152.55
$ 170.79
$ 208.06
dow jones transportation average
$ 100.00
$ 141.38
$ 176.83
$ 147.19
$ 179.37
$ 213.49

.

Question: what is the total cumulative percentage return on investment on class b common stock for the five years ended 122/31/2017?
Answer: 95.75%

Question: what is the difference in percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . versus the dow jones transportation average for the five years ended 12/31/2017?
Answer: -17.74%

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2017?
Answer: 95.75%
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 .
the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .
$ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
masco
$ 128.21
$ 120.32
$ 102.45
$ 165.80
$ 229.59
s&p 500 index
$ 125.92
$ 144.58
$ 147.60
$ 171.04
$ 225.85
s&p industrials index
$ 120.19
$ 151.89
$ 150.97
$ 173.87
$ 243.73
s&p consumer durables & apparel index
$ 136.29
$ 177.91
$ 191.64
$ 232.84
$ 316.28

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise .
at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares .
during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards .
we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2013?
Answer: 129.59%

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the performance of s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2010
Answer: 14.82%
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
united parcel service inc .
$ 100.00
$ 107.75
$ 140.39
$ 145.84
$ 151.44
$ 221.91
standard & poor 2019s 500 index
$ 100.00
$ 126.45
$ 145.49
$ 148.55
$ 172.30
$ 228.09
dow jones transportation average
$ 100.00
$ 118.59
$ 150.30
$ 150.31
$ 161.56
$ 228.42

.

Question: what was the percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2013?
Answer: 121.91

Question: what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the dow jones transportation average for the five years ended 12/31/2013?
Answer: -6.51%
part ii , item 8 fourth quarter of 2007 : 0160 schlumberger sold certain workover rigs for $ 32 million , resulting in a pretax gain of $ 24 million ( $ 17 million after-tax ) which is classified in interest and other income , net in the consolidated statement of income .
4 .
acquisitions acquisition of eastern echo holding plc on december 10 , 2007 , schlumberger completed the acquisition of eastern echo holding plc ( 201ceastern echo 201d ) for $ 838 million in cash .
eastern echo was a dubai-based marine seismic company that did not have any operations at the time of acquisition , but had signed contracts for the construction of six seismic vessels .
the purchase price has been allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated fair values as follows : ( stated in millions ) .

cash and short-term investments
$ 266
other current assets
23
fixed income investments held to maturity
54
vessels under construction
694
accounts payable and accrued liabilities
-17 ( 17 )
long-term debt
-182 ( 182 )
total purchase price
$ 838

other acquisitions schlumberger has made other acquisitions and minority interest investments , none of which were significant on an individual basis , for cash payments , net of cash acquired , of $ 514 million during 2009 , $ 345 million during 2008 , and $ 281 million during 2007 .
pro forma results pertaining to the above acquisitions are not presented as the impact was not significant .
5 .
drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco drilling fluids joint venture is owned 40% ( 40 % ) by schlumberger and 60% ( 60 % ) by smith international , inc .
schlumberger records income relating to this venture using the equity method of accounting .
the carrying value of schlumberger 2019s investment in the joint venture on december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.3 billion , respectively , and is included within investments in affiliated companies on the consolidated balance sheet .
schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 .
schlumberger received cash distributions from the joint venture of $ 106 million in 2009 , $ 57 million in 2008 and $ 46 million in 2007 .
the joint venture agreement contains a provision under which either party to the joint venture may offer to sell its entire interest in the venture to the other party at a cash purchase price per percentage interest specified in an offer notice .
if the offer to sell is not accepted , the offering party will be obligated to purchase the entire interest of the other party at the same price per percentage interest as the prices specified in the offer notice. .

Question: what was the debt to asset ratio in the eastern echo holding plc acquisition
Answer: 0.19
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 .
this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period .
the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any .
dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar .
the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

10/28/2007
10/26/2008
10/25/2009
10/31/2010
10/30/2011
10/28/2012
applied materials
100.00
61.22
71.06
69.23
72.37
62.92
s&p 500 index
100.00
63.90
70.17
81.76
88.37
101.81
rdg semiconductor composite index
100.00
54.74
68.59
84.46
91.33
82.37

dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share .
during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share .
during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 .
dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively .
applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders .
10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc .
s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: for how many common stock shares did the company pay dividends in 2012 , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 1251.4

Question: what is the roi of s&p500 if the investment takes place in october 2007 and it is sold in october 2010?
Answer: 18.24%

Question: how much did the quarterly dividend yield change from 2010 to 2012 for applied materials?
Answer: the dividend yield increased 0.04% from 2010 to 2012
10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc .
granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees .
the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle .
these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group .
the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met .
at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc .
had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit .
the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period .
altria group , inc .
recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million .
the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 .
altria group , inc .
did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 .
note 12 .
earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: .

( in millions )
for the years ended december 31 , 2017
for the years ended december 31 , 2016
for the years ended december 31 , 2015
net earnings attributable to altria group inc .
$ 10222
$ 14239
$ 5241
less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards
-14 ( 14 )
-24 ( 24 )
-10 ( 10 )
earnings for basic and diluted eps
$ 10208
$ 14215
$ 5231
weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps
1921
1952
1961

net earnings attributable to altria group , inc .
$ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . in 2017?
Answer: -28.2%

Question: what is the growth rate in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . in 2016?
Answer: 171.7%

Question: what is the percent change in net earnings attributable to altria group inc . from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 39.3%

Question: what is the percent change in earnings for basic and diluted eps from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 39.3%
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue
$ 991.1
retail electric price
-17.1 ( 17.1 )
purchased power capacity
-12.0 ( 12.0 )
net wholesale revenue
-7.4 ( 7.4 )
other
4.6
2008 net revenue
$ 959.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 .
refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing .
the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 .
purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges .
see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales .
gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage .
the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: -34.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008?
Answer: -3.2%

Question: what percent of the change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008 was due to purchased power capacity?
Answer: 37.6%

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008?
Answer: -31.9
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2013 versus 2012 .
net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.39 billion for 2013 , 13% ( 13 % ) lower than 2012 .
the decrease compared with 2012 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , partially offset by lower interest expense on financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value and collateralized financings .
2012 versus 2011 .
net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 .
the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value and collateralized agreements .
see 201cstatistical disclosures 2014 distribution of assets , liabilities and shareholders 2019 equity 201d for further information about our sources of net interest income .
operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .
compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .
discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment .
the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff ( which includes employees , consultants and temporary staff ) . .

$ in millions
year ended december 2013
year ended december 2012
year ended december 2011
compensation and benefits
$ 12613
$ 12944
$ 12223
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees
2341
2208
2463
market development
541
509
640
communications and technology
776
782
828
depreciation and amortization
1322
1738
1865
occupancy
839
875
1030
professional fees
930
867
992
insurance reserves1
176
598
529
other expenses
2931
2435
2072
total non-compensation expenses
9856
10012
10419
total operating expenses
$ 22469
$ 22956
$ 22642
total staff at period-end
32900
32400
33300

1 .
related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d in the consolidated statements of earnings .
goldman sachs 2013 annual report 45 .

Question: what is the percentage change in staff number in 2013?
Answer: 1.5%
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share .
our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt .
information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share .

quarter
dividends paid per share 2018
dividends paid per share 2017
first
$ 2.00
$ 1.82
second
2.00
1.82
third
2.00
1.82
fourth
2.20
2.00
year
$ 8.20
$ 7.46

stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index .
the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation .
the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .

Question: what is the percentage change in total dividends paid per share from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 9.9%
during the third quarter ended 30 june 2017 , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 145.3 and an intangible asset impairment charge of $ 16.8 associated with our lasa reporting unit .
refer to note 11 , goodwill , and note 12 , intangible assets , for more information related to these charges and the associated fair value measurement methods and significant inputs/assumptions , which were classified as level 3 since unobservable inputs were utilized in the fair value measurements .
16 .
debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2019 and 2018 : total debt .

30 september
2019
2018
short-term borrowings
$ 58.2
$ 54.3
current portion of long-term debt ( a ) ( b )
40.4
406.6
long-term debt
2907.3
2967.4
long-term debt 2013 related party ( b )
320.1
384.3
total debt
$ 3326.0
$ 3812.6

( a ) fiscal year 2019 includes the current portion of long-term debt owed to a related party of $ 37.8 .
( b ) refer to note 7 , acquisitions , for additional information regarding related party debt .
short-term borrowings short-term borrowings consisted of bank obligations of $ 58.2 and $ 54.3 at 30 september 2019 and 2018 , respectively .
the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2019 and 2018 was 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , respectively. .

Question: what is the short-term debt as a percent of long-term debt , in 2019?
Answer: 1.80%