MehdiHosseiniMoghadam/ConvFinQA huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 31 , 2013 .
( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc .
company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

company index
november 17 2011
december 31 2011
december 31 2012
december 31 2013
delphi automotive plc ( 1 )
$ 100.00
$ 100.98
$ 179.33
$ 285.81
s&p 500 ( 2 )
100.00
100.80
116.93
154.80
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )
100.00
89.27
110.41
166.46

dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares .
the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 .
in addition , in january 2014 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2014 .
in october 2011 , the board of managers of delphi automotive llp approved a distribution of approximately $ 95 million , which was paid on december 5 , 2011 , principally in respect of taxes , to members of delphi automotive llp who held membership interests as of the close of business on october 31 , 2011. .

Question: what was the percentage total return for delphi automotive plc for the three years ended december 31 2013?\\n
Answer: 185.81%

Question: what is the increase in the dividend in total for the year of 2014?
Answer: $ 0.32
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 .
the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company .
the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 .
note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved .
copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co .
all rights reserved .
apple inc .
| 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes .
september september september september september september .

september 2009
september 2010
september 2011
september 2012
september 2013
september 2014
apple inc .
$ 100
$ 160
$ 222
$ 367
$ 272
$ 407
s&p 500 index
$ 100
$ 110
$ 111
$ 145
$ 173
$ 207
dow jones u.s . technology supersector index
$ 100
$ 112
$ 115
$ 150
$ 158
$ 205
s&p information technology index
$ 100
$ 111
$ 115
$ 152
$ 163
$ 210

.

Question: what was the percentage of cumulative total shareholder return for the five year period ended september 2014 for apple inc.?
Answer: 307%
other expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: .

( in thousands )
year ended december 31 , 2013
year ended december 31 , 2012
foreign currency losses net
$ -1115 ( 1115 )
$ -1401 ( 1401 )
other income ( expense ) net
69
-4 ( 4 )
total other expense net
$ -1046 ( 1046 )
$ -1405 ( 1405 )

income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) .
during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) .
in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 .
an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns .
in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year .
in january 2013 , the u.s .
congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 .
the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity .
the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s .
research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities .
when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 .
net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
table of contents .

Question: what was the percentage change in the foreign currency losses net from 2012 to 2013
Answer: -20.4%

Question: what was the percentage change in the company 2019s net income from 2012 to 2013 .
Answer: 20.5%
entergy new orleans , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .
results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue .
2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue
$ 272.9
retail electric price
-16.9 ( 16.9 )
net gas revenue
-9.1 ( 9.1 )
gas cost recovery asset
-3.0 ( 3.0 )
volume/weather
5.4
other
-2.3 ( 2.3 )
2011 net revenue
$ 247.0

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .
the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 .
the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset .
see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .

Question: from the change in net revenue in 2011 , what percentage is attributed to change in retail electric price?
Answer: 65.3%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -9.5%

Question: what was the average net revenue between 2010 and 2011
Answer: 259.95
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis .
as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions .
as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

amount ( in thousands )
2009
$ 32452
2010
35138
2011
50421
2012
39067
2013
26301
years thereafter
137858
total
321237
less : amount representing interest
73512
present value of net minimum lease payments
$ 247725

grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million .
the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf .
the leases expire in 2015 .
under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases .
at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate .
in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf .
the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs .
system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements .
for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation .
however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes .
consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .
the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what is the growth rate in the net regulatory asset in 2008 compare 2007?
Answer: -47.5%
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

december 31 ( in dollars )
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
jpmorgan chase
$ 100.00
$ 109.88
$ 119.07
$ 160.23
$ 203.07
$ 189.57
kbw bank index
100.00
109.36
109.90
141.23
167.49
137.82
s&p financial index
100.00
115.18
113.38
139.17
169.98
147.82
s&p 500 index
100.00
113.68
115.24
129.02
157.17
150.27

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what is the estimated variation between the percentual decrease observed in the s&p 500 index and in the jpmorgan chase during the years 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 2.3%
entergy arkansas , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges .
the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue .
2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 .
the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges .
net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions )
2003 net revenue
$ 998.7
deferred fuel cost revisions
-16.9 ( 16.9 )
other
-3.4 ( 3.4 )
2004 net revenue
$ 978.4

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis .
deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million .
the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 2.08%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy arkansas inc.?
Answer: -2.0%
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense .
the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price .
as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt .
in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana .
grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million .
the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 .
system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 .
at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value .
in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy .
system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements .
for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation .
however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes .
consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .
the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

amount ( in thousands )
2017
$ 17188
2018
17188
2019
17188
2020
17188
2021
17188
years thereafter
257812
total
343752
less : amount representing interest
309393
present value of net minimum lease payments
$ 34359

.

Question: what are the implicit interest costs for the 2018 lease payments , in thousands?
Answer: 881.7

Question: what are the implicit interest costs for the lease payments due after 2021 , in thousands?
Answer: 13225.7
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

date
citi
s&p 500
s&p financials
31-dec-2011
100.0
100.0
100.0
31-dec-2012
150.6
116.0
128.8
31-dec-2013
198.5
153.6
174.7
31-dec-2014
206.3
174.6
201.3
31-dec-2015
197.8
177.0
198.2
31-dec-2016
229.3
198.2
243.4

.

Question: in 2016 what was the ratio of the five-year cumulative total return for citi compared to s&p 500
Answer: 1.32

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for citi common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2016?
Answer: 129.3%
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 29 , 2011 : fiscal years operating leases .

fiscal years
operating leases
2012
$ 17590
2013
12724
2014
6951
2015
5649
2016
3669
later years
19472
total
$ 66055

12 .
commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes .
as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail .
the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows .
13 .
retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees .
the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s .
employees .
this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation .
in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation .
the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s .
employees was $ 21.9 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 .
the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s .
employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices .
the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s .
employees was $ 21.4 million in fiscal 2011 , $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 and $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 .
non-u.s .
plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country .
the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s .
and non-u.s .
equity securities , bonds , property and cash .
the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 .
analog devices , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what is the growth rate in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for non-u.s.employees in 2011?
Answer: 82.9%

Question: what is the growth rate in the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s.employees in 2011?
Answer: 6.8%