MehdiHosseiniMoghadam/ConvFinQA huggingface dataset:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 .
this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period .
the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any .
dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar .
the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

10/25/2009
10/31/2010
10/30/2011
10/28/2012
10/27/2013
10/26/2014
applied materials
100.00
97.43
101.85
88.54
151.43
183.29
s&p 500 index
100.00
116.52
125.94
145.09
184.52
216.39
rdg semiconductor composite index
100.00
121.00
132.42
124.95
163.20
207.93

dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each .
during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share .
during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 .
dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively .
applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders .
$ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc .
s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: how many shares received dividends during 2014 , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 1217.5

Question: how much more return was given for investing in the overall market rather than applied materials from 2009 to 2014 ? ( in a percentage )
Answer: 33.1%

Question: what is the return on investment for applied materials if the investment occurred in 2009 and it is liquidated in 2012?
Answer: 11.5%

Question: how much more return was given for investing in the overall market rather than applied materials from 2009 to 2014 ? ( in a percentage )
Answer: 33.1%
entergy new orleans , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue .
2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 .
the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions )
2003 net revenue
$ 208.3
base rates
10.6
volume/weather
8.3
2004 deferrals
7.5
price applied to unbilled electric sales
3.7
other
0.6
2004 net revenue
$ 239.0

the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 .
the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector .
the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors .
the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 .
the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset .
the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively .
the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements .
the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 14.7%

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue for entergy new orleans , inc . in 2004?
Answer: 14.7%

Question: what portion of the net change in net revenue during 2004 occurred due to the volume/weather?
Answer: 27.0%
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period .
the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable .
we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse .
we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance .
the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. .

12/31/2002
12/31/2003
12/31/2004
12/31/2005
12/31/2006
12/31/2007
ventas
$ 100
$ 206
$ 270
$ 331
$ 457
$ 512
nyse composite index
$ 100
$ 132
$ 151
$ 166
$ 200
$ 217
all reit index
$ 100
$ 138
$ 181
$ 196
$ 262
$ 215
healthcare reit index
$ 100
$ 154
$ 186
$ 189
$ 273
$ 279
russell 1000 index
$ 100
$ 130
$ 145
$ 154
$ 178
$ 188

ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the growth rate of the ventas stock as of 12/31/2003
Answer: 106%

Question: what was the 5 year return on ventas common stock?
Answer: 412%

Question: what was the growth rate of reit index as of 12/31/2003
Answer: 38%

Question: what was the 5 year return on the nyse composite index?
Answer: 117%
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .

shares ( thous. )
weighted-averagegrant-date fair value
nonvested at january 1 2009
873
$ 50.70
granted
449
47.28
vested
-240 ( 240 )
43.23
forfeited
-22 ( 22 )
53.86
nonvested at december 31 2009
1060
$ 50.88

at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years .
a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants .
5 .
retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans .
qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements .
other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees .
these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses .
the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 .
funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability .
the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets .
the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases .
the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases .
plan assets are measured at fair value .
we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Question: at december 31 , 2009 , what was the remaining compensation expense per share for the unvested awards?
Answer: 20.75

Question: what is the annual compensation expense for the remaining unvested performance retention awards?
Answer: 1692307
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector .
such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc .
s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 .

as of december 31,
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
alcoainc .
$ 100
$ 57
$ 58
$ 72
$ 107
$ 68
s&p 500 aeindex
100
102
118
157
178
181
s&p 500 aematerials index
100
90
104
130
139
128

s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved .
source : research data group , inc .
( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .

Question: what was the percentual increase observed in the alcoainc . investment during 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 48.6%
34| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential .
our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties .
in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and is focused on accretive growth .
we have continued to operate at a substantially reduced level of new development activity , as compared to recent years , and are focused on the core operations of our existing base of properties .
recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments .
the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively ( in thousands ) : dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the 201ccode 201d ) , in order to maintain our reit status .
because depreciation and impairments are non-cash expenses , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income .
we paid dividends per share of $ 0.76 , $ 1.93 and $ 1.91 for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors .
distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant .
at december 31 , 2009 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding .
the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .

2009
2008
2007
recurring tenant improvements
$ 29321
$ 36885
$ 45296
recurring leasing costs
40412
28205
32238
building improvements
9321
9724
8402
totals
$ 79054
$ 74814
$ 85936

.

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the dividend from 2007 to 2008
Answer: 1%
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis refer to 201cselected financial data - five-year comparison of entergy corporation and subsidiaries 201d which accompanies entergy corporation 2019s financial statements in this report for further information with respect to operating statistics .
in november 2007 the board approved a plan to pursue a separation of entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business from entergy through a spin-off of the business to entergy shareholders .
in april 2010 , entergy announced that it planned to unwind the business infrastructure associated with the proposed spin-off transaction .
as a result of the plan to unwind the business infrastructure , entergy recorded expenses in 2010 for the write-off of certain capitalized costs incurred in connection with the planned spin-off transaction .
these costs are discussed in more detail below and throughout this section .
net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .
amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions )
2009 net revenue
$ 4694
volume/weather
231
retail electric price
137
provision for regulatory proceedings
26
rough production cost equalization
19
ano decommissioning trust
-24 ( 24 )
fuel recovery
-44 ( 44 )
other
12
2010 net revenue
$ 5051

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 8362 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all retail sectors , including the effect on the residential sector of colder weather in the first quarter 2010 compared to 2009 and warmer weather in the second and third quarters 2010 compared to 2009 .
the industrial sector reflected strong sales growth on continuing signs of economic recovery .
the improvement in this sector was primarily driven by inventory restocking and strong exports with the chemicals , refining , and miscellaneous manufacturing sectors leading the improvement .
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : increases in the formula rate plan riders at entergy gulf states louisiana effective november 2009 , january 2010 , and september 2010 , at entergy louisiana effective november 2009 , and at entergy mississippi effective july 2009 ; a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 ; rate actions at entergy texas , including base rate increases effective in may and august 2010 ; a formula rate plan provision of $ 16.6 million recorded in the third quarter 2009 for refunds that were made to customers in accordance with settlements approved by the lpsc ; and the recovery in 2009 by entergy arkansas of 2008 extraordinary storm costs , as approved by the apsc , which ceased in january 2010 .
the recovery of storm costs is offset in other operation and maintenance expenses .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the proceedings referred to above. .

Question: what was the percentage change of the net revenue in 2010
Answer: 7.61%

Question: what portion of the net change in net revenue is due to the retail electric price?
Answer: 38.4%
notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) .

2008
$ 317
2009
275
2010
236
2011
214
2012
191
later years
597
total minimum payments required
$ 1830

aon corporation .

Question: what is the percentual decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 13.25%

Question: assuming that actual net rent expense will be the same as presented in the table , what would be the growth rate in the net rent expense from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: -13.2%
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes .
the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 .
market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .
price range of common stock .

2003 first quarter
high $ 4.04
low $ 2.72
2002 first quarter
high $ 17.84
low $ 4.11
second quarter
8.37
3.75
second quarter
9.17
3.55
third quarter
7.70
5.91
third quarter
4.61
1.56
fourth quarter
9.50
7.57
fourth quarter
3.57
0.95

holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .
dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends .
in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests .
our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to .
see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .

Question: in q1 2003 , what was the average of the high and low stock price?
Answer: 3.38
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years .
the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2003 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 5/08 global payments inc .
s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/03 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending may 31 .
global payments s&p 500 information technology .

global payments
s&p 500
s&p information technology
may 31 2003
$ 100.00
$ 100.00
$ 100.00
may 31 2004
137.75
118.33
121.98
may 31 2005
205.20
128.07
123.08
may 31 2006
276.37
139.14
123.99
may 31 2007
238.04
170.85
152.54
may 31 2008
281.27
159.41
156.43

issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors .
under this authorization , we have repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock .
this authorization has no expiration date and may be suspended or terminated at any time .
repurchased shares will be retired but will be available for future issuance. .

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: 49.0%

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 37.8%
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .
backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .
backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) .

2015
2014
( in millions except percentages )
silicon systems
$ 1720
55% ( 55 % )
$ 1400
48% ( 48 % )
applied global services
812
26% ( 26 % )
775
27% ( 27 % )
display
525
16% ( 16 % )
593
20% ( 20 % )
energy and environmental solutions
85
3% ( 3 % )
149
5% ( 5 % )
total
$ 3142
100% ( 100 % )
$ 2917
100% ( 100 % )

applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations .
customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .
delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .
manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems .
applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia .
applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites .
although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .
accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .
applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .

Question: what is the growth rate in the segment of display from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: -11.5%

Question: what is the growth rate in silicon systems from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 22.9%

Question: how much percentage has backlog increased from 2014 to 2015
Answer: 7.7%