Fantastic Film, Flimsy Premise!

Rating: 1/10 (12 January 2020)

Reviewers unthinkingly praising this flick seriously need to develop the simplest of critical thinking skills, people!
Arthur Leigh Allen was a primed, not prime suspect, totally eliminated by all rational and scientific standards of evidence.
If we're to believe this flick's lame conclusion, victim Mike Mageau identifies Allen as the Zodiac killer 22 years after the fact from a grainy driver's license photo after having seen the shooter only in the dark of night, reputedly with a blinding flashlight's glare in his face. Even the actor in the scene was wincing.
Fast forward to the San Joaquin jail, where the intrepid faux-investigator, Graysmith, presses Darlene Ferrin's incarcerated sister, Linda del Buono, to finally blurt out the name of the mysterious stranger-in-a-suit from their so-called, "painting party," as LEE! Somebody del Buono would've seen as a direct eye-witness, up close and personal, in the light of day, and not whilst being shot by a gun multiple times in the dead of night.
Funny, nobody's thought to RUSH back to del Buono to confront HER with a clear photograph of Arthur Leigh Allen to either confirm or deny his identity and presence at that party!
In that single, solitary scene alone, the flick's whole silly and phony premise collapses into the mountainous heap of all the other fact-bending circumstantial non-evidence falsely peddled as the truth for profiteering purposes.
THINK, people, think!!!! Please.