Documentary?

Rating: 1/10 (2 March 2013)

If I was told this movie was a Documentary, I would have loved it, and perhaps politely not watched it as I was in for a movie. But to claim that this is cinematography, please believe me I registered specifically to write this review and inform how silly, dull and senseless this motion picture is (I'm not calling it a movie).
Sometimes you look around you and you say, OK, I can keep my opinion to myself, it is a subjective matter. Not in this case. There is no political correctness in the world to give justice to anything in this piece of work. Is it really complete? Has it been reviewed? Did someone other than the person who has to have something out there by a given date or their job is on the line agree to it?
It's like the sort of rubbish one comes up with at first shot, but people then polish and review it, hire professionals and keep working on it until it becomes decent enough to put out there for the public without collecting all the rotten tomatoes harvests from now till Kingdom Come. This incomplete deliverable stopped at the stage of rubbish at first and went straight to market.