What's wrong with Zero Dark Thirty?

Rating: 4/10 (9 September 2013)

What's wrong with Zero Dark Thirty? Too many things to list here. Unless you are blind to the factual and ground evidence, most of the crap in the movie was overblown and over exaggerated. Sure, it showed CIA torturing prisoners but it never really showed the true picture. It painted a very bleak picture of Pakistan, never cared to show anything positive. I didn't find it as offensive to me as a Pakistani but as a story based on true events, they should have at least stayed close to the facts. Seals came to Pakistan like a Ninja and do you really think each detail that they show in the operation was correct.It was also pretty funny how they crashed their helicopter. Did it all look believable to you. Than there was one totally ridiculous scene in which Jessica shouts out a slur in front of the CIA director , he doesn't even seem to care about it. Lastly, look at some scenes like the one that showed the guys in Burqa and the other one where they were showing excitement by the CIA female agent, who was going to meet a insider of Al-Qaeda, who ended up blowing himself. It is like they were trying desperately to gather sympathy for that woman so that they can make the story emotionally stronger.Zero Dark Shitty was a bad movie if we look at the facts shown in the movie. It barely deserves a 4/10 on facts alone. As a standalone movie, based on entirely fictitious accounts, it is pretty mediocre and deserve no more than 5 to 6. Also it is too much lengthy and has a run time of 2 and half hour, most of which ends up being boring unless you want to see Chastain. And if you REALLY want to so Chastain so badly, just watch her in Lawless and skip this movie.