Too abstract

Rating: 4/10 (9 August 2016)

Didn't know what to expect with this movie, but hey it had Michael Caine so I had to give it a go.
Obviously, it's an art film. That is pretty obvious right away. That being said, I don't like art films. Or rather, pompous films cry out "Hey I'm an art film!". Now Stanley Kubrick's are mostly art films but they are not pretentious. His movies are art in their delivery, not an art grandstand like this one.
The only saving grace were the titillating female nude scenes. But even then that was a little over the top, felt as if it was some kind of cheap exploit for lack of real story or substance.
Maybe it was trying to poke fun at the pretensions of Hollywood and/or of film making in general. Sort of laughing at ones self kind of thing. At any rate I found it too abstract and for the most part a waste of time, talent, and a bore.
Your better off going back and watching one of Micheal Caine's classics. Don't waste your time.