X-men 3 is better than the fist two

Rating: 9/10 (27 May 2006)

I was sooo tired of hearing that this X-men would be destroyed by Rattner after the success of the first two movies by Singer(who's Superman looks like a Gawd awful circa 1960's version of Superman)This is the fist X-men movie not to revolve around wolverine so that's a huge plus(Although I would surely like to see a well done Wolverine movie).The characters are closer to their source material's versions,as much as possible due to the past 2movies character blundering.Beast is by far the most accurate character,and i would most surely like to see Ratner dive further into the many characters X-men has to offer.At movies end at very least you were introduced to all of the actual founding X-men.Also its fairly Obvious Singer himself was not too sure of his story telling ability or else he could of held wolverine out of the first movie and went with the original X-men.That being said I would definitely go see X-men 4 and hope and pray for a head Villain other than Magneto.....Mr. Sinister would be a nice evolution.All in all I though the first 2movies were good but this one is as good if not better. ACTION was GREAT