The worst X-movie ever! Can't Hollywood get over of the Bat-effect?

Rating: 3/10 (12 June 2011)

Ever since I stepped out of the cinema, something so did not felt right about the movie. I watched it in English too, and all though its cleared one of the things that did not made sense to me (In Hungarian there's a translation mistake, which makes it sound the William Stryker in First Class is the same how we meet in X-men origins: Wolverine and X-2, and not the Father of him.) But that was only a slight difference, and the others still remained there. I checked the Faq section of First Class and finally I got some answers, but totally not the type of answers I would have liked.
"Is "First Class" a prequel or reboot? It's both actually. First Class goes back to 1962, to a time before Charles Xavier and Erik Lehnsherr took the names Professor X and Magneto, making it a prequel in the X-Men franchise. However, there are changes in continuity because, as director Matthew Vaughn explains it, we "were trying to reboot and start a whole new X-Men franchise and therefore, making a film work on its own two feet was far more important than trying to be referential to the prior movies." . In short, First Class is an attempt to take the characters back to an earlier period (a prequel) from which future movies can be rebooted."
So thats a replay to many of the things which did not feel right about X-men First Class. Personally to represent how I feel about this "brilliant" idea I would send Wolverines words to the Director and Story writers of First class. The ones he says when Charles and Eric approach him at the pub...
This fact alone blows down, 5 stars from the movie. Why the hack was there any need to reboot a great and developed tale? Dose Matthew Vaughn has a brain size of a peanut? and cant remember / keep in mind 4 movies? Not to do things which conflicts with the other movies? Or simply he just has zero Creativity and could not make up something, Like Hank Mccoy/Beast developed a machine which makes him able to look like a human for a period of time. //In X-2 we see him as a human. // Its don't even need to be genetic solution, a hologram or something could do that as well. Or for another example which got people confused in Wolverine movie... hint that the government toked blood sample from Emma Frost, which later on Stryker could use for his experiment, and the girl how we see in the end of the Wolverine movie, and claimed to be Silverfox sister aren't really Emma Frost, just a girl how Stryker experimented with.
So generally I would say First Class has a huge lack of story development. And the answer "oh its a reboot so it doesn't need to match with the other movies" don't make it a bit better, just even worst.
Over all the story wasn't so bad, quite watchable, if You can ignore the things I listed above. Acting was good, I cant complain to any of the actors. Visual effects was nicely made. But the concepts, and development of the movie is quite lame. I don't feel its a well though trough tale, no surprises like "Oh i did not see that coming". Its kinda showed what it should have shown, without creativity and lots of laziness... and "oh its a reboot" aren't an excuse. Thats whats makes X-men First Class The worst X-men movie ever, and makes it barely reach the line Watchable.
So like I say in the beginning of my review... Director and writers of X-men First class: Go F Your self's...