Not An MCU Movie, Needs to be Negatively Reviewed!

Rating: Null/10 (1 June 2016)

People mocked those who claimed there was a conspiracy to negatively lampoon any comic book movie that wasn't a Marvel Cinematic Universe movie after all of the negative reviews of Batman vs Superman (which I haven't seen anyone give me their own opinion they didn't just parrot from some big "professional" film critic and a movie that I only saw pacing problems with in the first hour).
But this movie is the proof that there is some kind of attempt to crush anything that isn't the MCU.
Civil War relied on a gaping plot hole at the beginning to make the plot work, and no one had any issue with it.
I can't help but think that if The Dark Knight came out this year it would have insanely negative reviews and a low score on Rotten Tomatoes with negative reactions to Heath Ledger's Joker. You know, since it wasn't the MCU.
X-men: Apocalypse was a great movie. I'd write a more in depth review, but I don't have a lot of time and I just got back from seeing the movie and have to leave for work soon.
But I guess since it's "Not the MCU" you're considered "not a true fan of cinema" if you liked this movie. Considering how if you say anything negative about the MCU you have to watch all of your friends bring up Rotten Tomatoes or Meta Critic so they can read out loud what their favorite critic had to say to "disprove" what I said about those movies.
I know someone will see this and get upset that I am implying there is an attempt to crush anything not part of the MCU, but you think it's impossible?
Disney has the money to pay off critics. Especially since the figure that if they can crush the competition (DC) and crush the Fox X-men movies, they figure they can get the rights back to those movies.
Because Marvel Studios NEEDS The X-men. Time is running out and while Marvel is going to be losing their big names, DC will be giving us classic characters on the big screen who have never gotten their own movie.
So I say Disney has paid critics to crush anything Non-MCU. Non-MCU Marvel movies so they can get the rights back to them so their universe isn't carried solely by Spider-man and a bunch of D- listers. And crush DC to keep the competition at bay while they get their ducks in a row about how to keep their shared universe afloat after they lose all of the characters that built it.
And let me address the "plot holes" I've seen mentioned in this movie. Most of the plot holes aren't plot holes. Because you have to remember, this movie takes place in a new timeline after Logan changed history in "Days of Future Past." So "Why is Nightcrawler an X-man at the end, they didn't meet him until X-2 in the 2000s." Well, this is a new timeline, so now they met him earlier.
"Why was Mystique an X-man at the end? She's always been their enemy, look at the first 3 movies!!" Well, new timeline, she never became the killer she was in the original trilogy, so this new Mystique is an X-man and is an Anti-Hero.
"Why did Angel have metal wings? He didn't have them in X-men: The Last Stand?" Because NEW TIME LINE.
"Why didn't we see Jean and Scott in X-men: Origins Wolverine if she was the one who freed him?" Did you not hear the NEW TIMELINE PART?
Seriously, this movie has been picked apart and picked apart and all of the issues people have are only there because they ignore that the last movie altered the timeline so now the events of the first 3 movies and all of their spin-offs NEVER HAPPENED.
Seriously, maybe people should show a little more scrutiny to the MCU. Because if you take the "Critics love it, I gotta love it too" goggles off and pay attention you'll see that every one of those movies is full of huge problems.