Poorly done movie with misleading title.

Rating: 2/10 (5 July 2013)

WORLD WAR Z is like watching Brad Pitt walk around talking about his new conditioner and his cool new pants. IT WAS TERRIBLE!!! Read the book and go see something else. Don't like reading? Get the World War Z audio book and listen to it in your car! This was such a typical
Hollywood junk move: buy the rights to something that was awesome and turn it into a steaming pile of over-hyped garbage.
Max Brooks, the author of Zombie Survival guide and World War Z, went out of his way in these books to undo the damage done by low grade zombie movies and give credibility to a zombie outbreak. The zombie moved in a predictable slow rate, they were defeated by faster, more agile living, they were truly undead due to a virus that transforms the front of the brain to an anaerobic organism. The advantage they had was simply their numbers, being able to infect new hosts and their undead stamina.
The movie had "fast zombies" who ran and bounced around like a glittering vampire from Twilight. The movie had NO resemblance to the memoir style the book or the events that took place within. The guy who is supposed to be an interviewer/narrator is instead cast as the most "Joe Bad-ass" journalist I've ever seen (Brad Pitt) and he saves the world. Good thing he has Jesus hair, because he went all sorts of savior on this one.