Why This is the Worst Adaptation Ever:

Rating: 5/10 (19 May 2014)

If this movie had a different title, no one would even have the thought that it might be an adaptation of the book "World War Z". Here's just some of the reasons why:
1) The main character in the movie is a retired U.N. worker named Gerry Lane. Nowhere in the novel "World War Z" does the journalist interview a guy named Gerry Lane. In fact, I don't think he even interviews someone from the United Nations.
2) The novel WWZ is about a journalist that interviews people AFTER the war happened. The movie takes place all DURING the war.
3) The novel WWZ is very realistic and the politics described in it are very accurate. There are basically no politics in WWZ and when there are any they are not very accurate and hardly detailed.
Aside from that, there is also no character development at all, and Brad Pitt's character is the only one we see anything of.
However, it did have some good points. For example, it was nice to see a zombie movie where their main goal was to infect people and not to eat them in the goriest ways possible.
But mostly, this movie was the most failed "adaptation" ever.