After you take out feminist propaganda and misandry - a mediocre superhero film

Rating: 4/10 (6 June 2017)

Granted, if you compare to Elektra or Catwoman, this is better. But, other than that, it's nothing special really.
Feminist propaganda is too much (we are "reminded" every 15 minutes or so that "men are bad and only useful for procreation"), but misandry is not as bad as one might expect (it's mostly to feel sorry for the men, not to treat them bad). But, if one were to take them out, what is left is a bunch of stuff that don't make much sense, even if you consider it's about some comic book version of Greek Gods - thus, not even superheroes, really.
Take, for example, the praised "No Man's Land" scene. Is Wonder Woman invulnerable or not? That is, like Superman, if a bullet hits her, it doesn't harm her. There are two options:
1. She is not invulnerable - then, she can't possibly protect herself with those glorified bracelets against a whole army shooting. At least some bullets will hit her in the legs and, also, she's fast, but even as a goddess, she can't be at more than two places at once with her arms, so, if 3 bullets are going towards her...
2. She is invulnerable - then, what's with the bracelets? Just walk over and beat them up.
There's not much fun or funny moments, most jokes are with at least a touch of misandry.
Last, but not the least, Gal Gadot is not a good actress and doesn't really look that good. She's OK, but she's far from the "most beautiful woman in the world" and, while she obviously trained a lot, doesn't fit that great in that silly armor. She fit much better in the white dress in Batman vs Superman. A better actress would do a better job of showing her innocence in learning about the real world, which could have been much more fun.