Prepubertal Massproduct

Rating: 1/10 (1 July 2017)

The movie is not a real disaster, and a younger audience may even like it, but for me it is just the 1.000.000st superhero-movie. The plot set in WWI is super-dumb, generic, and well, Gal Gadot is very pretty. The first hour felt really loong stretched and extremely boring. The rest of the movie is just boring and the fighting scenes are all a terrible awful composed overloaded cgi-feast.
How this movie gets such a high rate, and especially even by the IMDb staff is a mystery to me. But lately, I noticed that many movies I didn't like at all were rated high by IMDb staff - Wonder Woman got a 8.0 and the last King Arthur a 7.7 by IMDb staff. Really!? For comparison - a masterpiece like Apocalypse Now is rated 8.4 by IMDb staff. King Arthur and Wonder Woman are not even on the same planet as the dark vision of Mr. Coppola.
For me IMDb loses it's creditability rapidly. Wonder Woman like King Arthur - mediocre movies at best. A rating of 8 or higher!? Ridiculous.
Some reviewers call this the best D.C. output so far - well, if this is the best D.C. can do, the company should pull back from movie bizz and focus on publishing comics again.
But I will confess, if I would be still aged around 10 or 12 I maybe would like Wonder Woman more.
Last but not least, the main theme, the setting of a woman fighting in the trenches of WWI is just a recycled idea - Mr. Zack Snyder did this already in Sucker Punch and the execution of the fighting scene there is zillion times better done. Even too lazy to write an original script for such a big production... Disappointing.
Anti-Fake-Rate: 1 Real rate: 5