Wonder Woman 2017 Review

Rating: 9/10 (11 June 2017)

Pros: The Wonder Woman (2017) film proved to be a equilibrium of Man of Steel with a little of Captain America The First Avenger. A mixture of origin was given that was well appreciated, with a superb nature that's aesthetic of vision that brings you into a new world that seems cleansed of pollution; therefore the Island's landscape was good. The storyline was more of a grade 8 out of a 10 point scale, for there was some inspirational moments that promoted somewhat of a Utopian view built of courage, love, humanitarianism and voluntary sacrifice. (Spoiler) Wonder Woman's idea of peace and love in men's hearts is that when a spiritual ground of warfare from the persuasion of the God of War and Malice is obliterated, peace and love will remain the only influence; it's nice to influence that narrative but unfortunately, its much deeper than that.
The action in the film was a total wonder of action, stylized in comic visage - graphic from it's speed-to-slow motion scenes. A warrior like characteristics (heroism) they made Wonder Woman, which I must say they've done exceptionally well. However, there were a good amount of scenes were it's a lot of slow-motion poses (seemingly; it's like "take the picture type of position).
There was many humorous portions, you may inevitably laugh at some of those portions.
My favorite is they've staged Wonder Woman (2017)film as a lover of Men, not the vast majority of feminist today that oppress men, promote wantons, and give improvidence and dissipation. Conversely, Wonder Woman (WW) was portrayed as the treasure, which councils with sensible encouragement while crowning love and kindness to men despite there imperfections, WW symbolic as the nurture, submission of endearment, empowered by sensibility and understand of primitive behavior with hope.
Cons: Before I saw this movie I had skepticism that it would turn out to be a feminist film that would give a propaganda of victimization, and hatred of men and promote lesbianism. However, it was nearly the complete opposition accept for the moment she influence the propaganda that women secretaries is identified as slavery which slaves the last time I recall were barely or ever paid for their services. In addition (spoiler) when Wonder Woman emphasized that men are not needed for pleasure but only for procreation. However, despite the haughty of bitterness of whatever feminist promoted this in the storyline is non-aesthetic, non-prudential, non-ontological in a sense of connection of the physical and it's lingering endearments of erotic love in penetrative way of complementary opposition of the sexes. Furthermore, the very narrative of non-need of pleasure but only procreation denies the foundation of all women that are strong lovers of men, that look for the value of cherishing pleasure from men and have no desire to be socially constructive on the narrative that all else from men is irrelevant accept the portion of procreation. Pleasures in life are built on many things but not just the sense of the mate but that of ontological, fatherhood, and the abilities of a helping consort for vehement flame and backbone that's often innately physically stronger than the other without living in the fantasy conjunction of ignorance. It's wrong for a biological man to instate a biological woman as only need for procreation than pleasure; just as it's wrong for biological woman to instate a biological man is only needed for procreation and not pleasure. For it eliminations ontological of complementary aestheticism.
Overall: I've enjoyed the film and look forward to buying it in both 4k Ultra HD and 3d Blu-ray when made available to add to my collection of Man of Steel, BvS: Dawn of Justice, The Dark Knight Trilogy and Suicide Squad. Wonder Woman is an Epic film that's enjoyable to watch repeatedly like Man of Steel.