No, It's Wonder's Land.

Rating: 7/10 (6 June 2017)

Here goes. Wonder Woman is worthy, I am not in any way at all, taking that away from it, however, this film has faults too, just too severe to justify a 93% rating. Wonder Woman is a solid 7.2/10, but I feel when it comes to DC, many critics and fans alike just seem to miss the appropriate appreciation. BvS and Suicide Squad were rated way too low, and Man of Steel was just robbed of its excellence, and now, Wonder Woman is rated way too high. 93% is The Dark Knight, The Avengers, Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Iron Man level... Wonder Woman, is not that.
Firstly, let me get into its positives. The script, is well constructed and executed. The story is awesome, cohesive and gripping. Gal Gadot for me is always only as good as her talent allows her to be. She is always, or at least, most of the time, adequate for her roles, and it's no different here. Chris Pine, I'm an absolute fan, and I was afraid that his talents would be misrepresented by a forced dialogue and script; what an amazing surprise it was to see that Jenkins and Co. nailed him so well.
Now, the problems that Wonder Woman had. I'll mention this one first, because it's importance is based on Warner Bros. making the same mistakes as they did with previous DCEU installments, except this time, it's the other way around.
Wonder Wonder, with the awesome script and performances it accomplished, deserved the budget BvS had, and BvS deserved the budget Wonder Woman had (sadly BvS's substandardness could only be known after the fact). This film was impacted negatively by its shoddy editing, questionable cinematography at so many points, and just badly executed fight sequences, all because the budget was thin, based on Warner Bros.'s fear from past outcomes - and we've become accustomed to a certain level of quality, or at least I know I have. There were even points, where Wonder Woman herself, seemed like nothing but a computer generated concoction.
Ares!!! Why? Why was he included in this Wonder Woman? He was a perfect setup as Wonder Woman's ultimate nemesis, in later installments such as, Wonder Woman 3 perhaps. The writers and Jenkins built him up and set him up PERFECTLY... Just so perfectly, but then, he was wasted on a shoestring budget, 15 minutes towards the end of the movie, with armor equivalent to Tony Stark's Mark I when he was stuck in the cave. Ares, who's not only the God of War, but also, the Death God was incredibly, just so unbelievably wasted, and this, cannot by anyone, be denied.
Lastly I'll mention, whether you like it or not; Wonder Woman, as enjoyable as it was, was very, very reminiscent of 1. Thor and 2. Captain America: The First Avenger, all the way down to the British flag waving at the end of the movie. I kept trying to overlook it, but as the story progressed, the harder it became, to a point where it felt like I was watching Captain Thor: The First League Member.
Wonder Woman is awesome, better than Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2., it truly is. The script is on point (though arguably, Steve didn't need to approach the end like he did), Gal was nice, Chris was amazing, the humor was damn near perfect, Rupert Gregson-Williams is deadly on the score and everybody else played their parts like pros, but I can't help but feel that, Warner Bros. played too many of their cards, because Ares, was not at all supposed to be the main villain of this movie. Ares's wasted appearance, the lackluster budget (and keep in mind, this is a blockbuster and a proper budget is part of its armor) and a story too, reminiscent of Marvel's previous installments, compromise what was actually, something awesome to watch.
Is it a 93%? Not by a long shot whatsoever. Is it a good movie however, hells yeah it is. 7.2/10.