Oh, so pale, so pale, so pale...

Rating: 4/10 (26 November 2007)

Indeed, so pale. This movie does not have a hint of intelligence, and so many call it remarkably funny-. But funny comedies are truly the ones that remain to the passing of time: no one will remember "Wedding Crashers" in 10 years for its "un-aging" script, but for its supernatural box office report. Owen Wilson is one of Hollywood's worst actor: try to think in any good role of him (or at least serious) Vince Vaughn talking fast and without mistakes? A pond in the screenwriter's continuity (if any). What is it with development of movies that the script has the same pattern everywhere? "Supposedly" funny introduction-Light Comedy-Corny Introduction of Love Story-Conflict with moral dilemma.
I didn't laugh at once, the characters are so mistaken for funny prototypes; the scenes are uncomfortable and painful. The script doesn't even exist. Nothing remembering good, warm movies or at least pseudo-intellectual like "Matrix". They don't have to be intellectual, but at least sharp like Shyamalan's twists, or stupidly hilarious like "Scary Movie" I didn't like the movie, because it didn't apply to my sense of humour. Maybe if you are in a sad streak, or you have a light laugh and a nice mood, you watch this and like it with a little bit of sympathy. Try, I disliked it. Besides: who is the director? Does he even exist? Dubkin? Did he survive WWII?