Terrible film but nice to see that the IMDb can still be bought

Rating: 1/10 (7 April 2008)

Does anyone else ever wonder why the worst movies have all their 10 star comments at the beginning of the list? I wonder how much the film companies have to pay to the IMDb to keep it this way? Ever notice how many of the 10 star comments are usually the only comment by that person? The scenario: One guy watches one really terrible film, thinks its the greatest thing he has ever seen and then never writes another comment in their life. Sound fishy? Or how about the guy who only seems to give 10 stars to the worst movies? Never bothers to rate anything other than new bad films and never gives them anything less than 10?! Its pretty laughable. I am really glad I don't know any of those people. It is pretty sad that the IMDb can be bought in this way and does nothing to police itself. But I guess that's show biz.
And as far as the Mel Gibson fascist film industry goes, I'd rather watch anything by Mel Brooks than the best of Mel Gibson. Maybe when Obama shows that the US still has some balls, will racists like Mel Gibson have to learn that we see though his Christian veneer to the ugly hatemonger he really is.