if in the end he didn't tapped and won with a broken shoulder it was awesome movie

Rating: 7/10 (17 January 2013)

I've noticed a lot of people complaining that the ending spoils the film and is clichéd because the underdog and not the better fighter wins and i am one of them, if you take out the last half hour from the movie it was perfect 10 on 10 but a fighter like Kobe with such experience lost to a school teacher , i cant digest that and in all of his fights he was taking the beating still won all of them in a similar fashion. and apart from Kobe and two brothers it was evident none of the other fighters had any chance because they had no limelight in movie, so top16 fighters in world and you come with this? fighting scenes were good and real in starting but in the end it was shown in movie that you cant beat that teacher because it does not matter the amount of beating he will have he will still stand up and win by submission somehow 3 times in a row , i wondered why other opponent were so dumb to not to submit him when they were so dominant. and why the hell tommy was not able to take the teacher down in a fashion like he destroyed his other opponents ? just because you wanted to show a good fight between brothers in end? these things are so away from reality + the format why brothers were not scheduled to fight earlier or Kobe fight with brothers in start ? as if format was also tricked . only plus point is the story other than fighting.