Catering to the juvenile Warcraft gamers.

Rating: 2/10 (18 June 2016)

There is a reason why real gamers pick on Warcraft gamers as being immature, and the least respectable of gamers. Blizzard doesn't care so much about quality as they do for their bottom line, so integrity in gaming goes out the window, especially obviously in movie making as well, and flashy over the top seeming special effects trickery get lost with the extremely weak and unmotivated story line. The majority of most of the character motivation are lost with unexplained illogical pettiness. All of the civilian reviews are of Warcraft gamers base. If Blizzard didn't have that they would never have made a movie knowing they would not have gotten their money back.
There are some that even dare to compare this to 'Lord Of The Rings'. Are you kidding me? They are different worlds, and don't even belong in the same universe. If Bizarro would have made a fantasy movie based off of 'Lord Of The Rings', 'Warcraft' would have been it. Flashy special effects can fool the least intellectually challenged among us, and the weak story line, and conversations can and did smoothly slip by like a snake to the uninitiated. Even the special effects really weren't that well done. If I can tell it's CGI then it's not very good. The whole point is to fool you that its real isn't it? It's an 'Avatar' wanna be. It's the same people that think '2012', 'Battleship', 'Hardcore Henry' where phenomenal movies. If you are one of those people I'm sure you will be tickled pink by the lost attempts at humor, and puns. The only time I knew there was a joke intended was because of the very awkward long pause. Then I was left thinking, what was the joke?
I have played Warcraft for years, and had thee most successful guild of over 300 active players on my server, and quit, because of the maturity factor with the game and the players. Too much trolling.
So if you are of the more cerebral variety you won't get much from this movie including your money back. There is a reason why we need to ignore the wanna be civilian critics since they tend to always be wrong, and rate opposite of official critics. Why is that? Take a look at Rotten Tomatoes. 27%. I didn't think anything could be worse than 'Superman vs. Batman'. I was wrong. You will get the same shameless overzealous immature wanna be critics of that movie as well saying it's the best movie ever! I think there should be consequences for these critics that they pay for your ticket if you didn't like the movie, and I don't mean little bit, but hated it. Maybe then they would be a bit more conservative with their over zealous critique.
Comparing this to 'Lord Of The Rings' is beyond laughable. No Oscar nominations for this movie, not even for special effects. LOL