Not as good as IMDb's rating. Not even close.

Rating: 3/10 (14 July 2016)

The good: The CG is very well done for the most part. A fair bit of action and interesting special effects. Seeing a world from a much-loved video game franchise brought to life on the big screen will fill WoW fans with contentment for a short while.
The bad: Although the plot has more than a few twists, they aren't that surprising. Worse, they don't have much impact because, among the large cast of characters, only a couple can be connected to on an emotional level. In my case, Durotan, the main Orc protagonist, was the only character I felt any attachment to, and it wasn't all that much. Garona, the human-orc hybrid, played by Paula Patton, was next in line. She has some complexity and an interesting look, but I mostly "meh". The rest of the characters could bathe in glory or their own blood for all I cared.
My two sons agreed that the movie was forgettable with my eleven year-old stating that the best thing about the movie was the popcorn.
Which brings me to my point: As I write, Warcraft currently has an IMDb rating of 7.4. The reviews written in May, most of which were made before the official release date of May 24th (in France), are highly positive (9-10). The reviews begin to shift to highly negative (3-4) in late May and into June as the movie was released in more countries (ie. North America on June 10th). Currently, the main competing movie and TV review sites rate Warcraft much more negatively than IMDb. Clearly, the IMDb rating and review system is being successfully gamed. I will be taking that into account from here on out when looking at IMDb reviews and will be consulting ratings from competing review sites before making any decisions.
How the mighty have fallen.