The Worst Film ever made

Rating: 1/10 (31 May 2006)

This has got to be one of the worst films ever made. The story line is so bad that I know children that could have done better. The story line appeared to lack any direction or content. The star character is unbelievable and throughout the film I was amazed by the things occurring. After I finished watching this film my first thought was that there is 2 hours of my life I will never get back.
The cinematography and make-up were very good, though, and about the only positive in an otherwise pointless film.
I have my reservations as Tom Cruise as an actor. Whilst Tom has been in some very good films I feel that the films would have been a lot better if someone else was starring. Tom has got to be one of the luckiest actors around because some of the parts he has been given could fool anybody into believing he could actual act. You can always measure an actors ability in a film when the are co-staring with undoubtedly good actors. For example 'Interview with a vampire' showed me that whilst Brad Pitt could act Tom Cruise couldn't. This film would have been better if they had employed a better actor which could have raised the standard of the film, but the story still would have been terrible and unbelievable.
My suggestion is get another film.