Worst 'monster'-movie ever

Rating: 1/10 (17 November 2006)

I'm not gonna explain the plot of this movie, because that would be a waste of space, trust me. Everything about this movie is wrong. Hollywood just scrambled some nice and famous actors, spent millions, and I mean MILLIONS of dollars on CGI, and 0,000 in story/plot line and/or logic. The logic in this movie is so bad, that I think only a 4-year old could see through these horrid flaws. I.e.: Hugh Jackman wears a ring throughout the movie, but when he transforms into a werewolf later-on, he doesn't wear it anymore. "Could've come of by the transformation into a werewolf" I hear you say, but here comes the funny part; When he talks to Dracula himself later on and changes back into his human form, Dracula makes a comment about the ring on Hugh's hand that supposedly belongs to him. Ermmm... What happened here?! Did he put the ring back on in a split-second or what?? Thats just bad movie-making! Also, if you want to make a movie about monster-movie classics, make sure you got your facts right. The monster of Frankenstein wasn't called Frankenstein, only the doctor was called like that.
I have to admit that at least the idea behind the whole 'monster-classic'-ode of the movie sounds cool, but when it comes to it, this movie can't even get clóse to those classics.
The CGI-effects are also so wááááy to much on the foreground, that it made me feel like I was watching somebody play a (bad) video game on his PC. The werewolves look like furries on steroids, and act like gorrila's. Isn't a werewolf suppose to act wolvish, or at least something like that anyway? Now they jump over buildings like a furry version of the incredible Hulk. The barks-sounds that they made also were not very convinsing (wolves don't bark). Same thing goes for the vampires: just as terrible.
All in all; just rent some monster-classics and keep on dreaming of what this movie cóuld have been. This is a 'modern'-view of monsters that should not be.