The mad adrenaline and non-stop action makes up for the at best weak plot.

Rating: 7/10 (3 May 2009)

I'm not certain why so many people hated this movie. I think it's because they expected something fantastic, Oscar-material, CGI laden action with deep philosophical ruminations, etc...
No. Van Helsing isn't like that. The plot is at it's very best weak, there are obvious stupidities, and the acting, while not at all bad, is really unremarkable. But Van Helsing makes up for it by having boundless energy. The movie doesn't stop for one moment, piling acting upon action upon action sequences. All of that stuff about automatic crossbows, miniature bombs, and life-experiments... that's all bull. Of course it is. But it looks extremely good on screen, so just accept it and enjoy the fast-paced action.
The acting... well, varied. Princess Anna was quite unconvincing to me. Too much pathos and drama, not enough regality (although again, that's just my opinion). Van Helsing, Carl, and Velkan were all on the level, convincing, and sometimes even very good (I particularly like that little line after Van Helsing shoots quite a few baby vampires. 'Now that I have your attention'.) Count Dracula was quite brilliant, and I believe that is the best role of vampire/scientist gone mad I have seen. His evil is believable, and his manner of speech is perfect for the role: a bit drawling, aloof, mocking. Best of all, he actually LOOKS the part. He is quite tall, equine, and there is the mark of those graced with aristocratic disregard for human life.
Should you watch Van Helsing? Sure. But not if you need a quiet night in. Gather around with some friends, watch it on a big screen with good surround sound.
7/10