Good.

Rating: 10/10 (6 May 2004)

It was good, they had good effects and Hugh Jackman and Kate Beckinsale did good but Richard Roxburgh didn't. He was trying to make his accent to much like the original Dracula instead of making his own. Now to the effects. The effects were very good although the movie relied on it too much but it still made Van Helsing a good movie. The female vampires were really scary by the way. The lines were also not very good because they mixed our time with the time in the movie. And also in near the end when the moon was blocked and Hugh Jackman turned back into a man Dracula didn't kill him or even run away like he was trying to do when Hugh was still a wolf, that part didn't make sense at all. Also didn't you notice that when Van Helsing was a wolf he was bigger than all the other ones, that also didn't make sense. Thats all I have to say, It was good but not really good, because it was actors versus the effects, and lets face it some of the actors didn't do too good but Hugh Jackman and Kate Beckinsale compensated for that. That's why it is only good and not really good.