I can see why the writer took his name off

Rating: 8/10 (3 April 2006)

Years ago I read the graphic novel that is the basis for the movie. I was overjoyed to hear it was being made, but dismayed to discover that the original writer Alan Moore was unhappy with it. Now I've seen it I understand why. The relationship between Evey and V has been romanticised far too much, obviously to broaden the movie's appeal, and this softens the impact of V's behaviour; he is acting out of love and defence now, instead of righteous vengeance seeking anarchy. I can't remember the twist about the St.Mary's/Three Waters outbreak in the original either, but it does serve its purpose to make the totalitarian government look even more manipulative than V. Praise should go to Stephen Rea & Tim Pigott-Smith for their performances. I felt that the movie needed a stronger hand behind the camera though - it all looks a little flat and feels lifeless at times. I'm still happy with the film and glad it was made at last. Now we need some brave fool to try and film Moore's other classic, Watchmen.