what is alan moore's problem?????

Rating: 8/10 (2 August 2006)

i really can't understand why alan moore didn't want to be part of this film. i really believe that the film stayed as close to the graphic novel as it possibly could. personally, i don't see how this film could have stayed more true to the graphic novel unless it was 5+ hours longer, and if they changed the time period to the original thatcher'esquire era as opposed to a futuristic London. does anyone really know what the deal is with moore and this movie? i know previous film's based on his works have been complete garbage- but i don't think he's even seen v yet... i've read a comment with moore bashing the script, saying it was crap- but without giving any reason for why besides some comment about the breakfast scenes and how Americans are implying that that's all the English eat for breakfast. strange given the fact that the director is British.... oh well, i'm not trying to start a war here as to what's better the comic or the film, i'd just like to know alan moore's thoughts on the final product. if anyone has any links, please post them! overall i think v for vendetta is probably one of the most socially important, entertaining, and idealistically punk rock films i've ever been lucky enough to see!!!!