Personally, I felt this film defined 'mediocre'

Rating: 3/10 (16 March 2007)

With the exception of Crash, V for Vendetta is the film least deserving of a place in the top 250.
This film has all the problems of the matrix trilogy, with none of the good points. It's script is clunky and melodramatic, and it lacks any of the amazing action that is so endearing with the Matrix. Hugo weaving hams it up spectacularly behind a grinning mask who has a practically schizophrenic personality (seriously, if we are to believe that this man is a cold-blooded freedom fighter, we do not need to see him flipping pancakes). Natalie Portman proves beyond all doubt that she cannot act for toffee, and gets by on attractiveness alone. Stephen Fry makes the best use of a badly written character, but even he is below his usual standard. The rest of the cast were perfectly unmemorable.
The film was V. V. boring (see what I did there!). Without any action, coherent storyline, decent script or well rounded characters, this film is not worth anyones time and energy. I suppose it's because I'm British and can't stand any melodrama, but this film just irritated me.