"What is known can become un-known" Friedrich Nietzsche

Rating: Null/10 (31 July 2011)

(I made up the above quote by the way)
This is a preposterous movie and I have never seen one more-so. It is that way by design, with the sole purpose to exasperate the viewer for much of its run-time, then wipe the confusion and anger away with late reveal. And upon learning the "twist", the viewer is supposed to feel the relief of understanding.
All well and good, but if you view the film a second time, in full knowledge of the twist, you will still be shocked at the series of outrageous events and strange coincidences that drive the premise.
I just can't abide a movie, based nominally in the "real world", that requires so much suspension of disbelief. I will close this mini-review with the most minor example: Liam Neeson explains to a scientist (paraphrasing from memory), "When I was 10 years, I told my father I wanted to be a botanist." That is not an example of a plot hole, because it inconsequential to the plot. But it is the least plausible sentence ever uttered on film.