Better than I expected

Rating: 7/10 (16 July 2004)

Whenever I watch movies of this sort, I'm always afraid that I'm going to watch a special effects extravaganza that's all style and no substance. I honestly feel that a great film can be made without flashy f/x, but as long as the whole feature is not merely a showcase for those f/x, I don't have a problem. That was the case with "Underworld." Along with the fast-paced action sequences is a well-written story that develops nicely throughout the course of the film. It is an original spin on the age-old vampire tale. As one of the co-writers pointed out in an interview, the film is based more on science than folklore. Therefore, don't expect your usual wooden crosses and stakes through the heart. The director's intention was to create an action film, only featuring vampires and werewolves (referred to as Lycans). Personally, I still think it falls into the horror genre, but it doesn't follow too many of the cliches of its genre. The story is hard-to-follow at times, but that's part of what I liked. I like when a movie challenges me to pay attention and use my brain, rather than insult my intelligence. So those who are expecting wall-to-wall action, blood and gore might be disappointed. I think the film's rich storyline is what made it a success. I was impressed to find out it was made for a little over 20 million. As the director pointed out in the DVD commentary, the budget for this movie is half of what is costed to make the chase sequence in "Matrix Reloaded." So I can't classify this as high-budget trash, because there wasn't even a high budget. But it's not low-budget trash either. It's funny how I just read a review complaining about the film's cheesy "CGI effects." There was hardly any CGI! Most of the effects are practical, which is refreshing in a day and age where directors seem to live and die by CGI (hey, it rhymes!). Kate Beckinsale makes a great heroine, and brings a nice element of class to the film. Plus, seeing her roam around in a tight rubber suit didn't cause any complaints on my part. Boy, is she beautiful! And for the ladies, there's Scott Speedman who brings a nice vulnerability to his role. It's a lot more impressive than his flat performance in "Dark Blue." I loved the whole look of the film. It almost appears film-noirish. If you want to see a horror movie that delivers and isn't full of cliches, you'll be in for a treat. (7 out of 10)