Artistic License is one thing, but this film is just stupid!

Rating: 2/10 (30 January 2016)

It's understandable for film makers to use some artistic license to portray real events.
To explain something to the audience in simplistic terms rather than go into long winded in depth historical analysis. To shorten something due to the practicalities of film making etc.
This film goes way beyond 'artistic license' it is frankly stupid.
Whats frightening is that many people will now believe they know some history based on this awful film.
It is totally inaccurate, totally implausible and totally unbelievable.
The biggest insult is that the 'writers' clearly think we (the audience) are all un-educated, dull witted morons.
I have to say this film is so bad, that I think the term 'writer' should be replaced with 'crayon wielding clueless chimp'.