Not a Twilighter, a huge Potter fan though.

Rating: 5/10 (4 August 2009)

I prefer Harry Potter in every way over Twilight. Twilight was like watching Days of our Lives but with awful special effects and vampires. I don't know how people could be obsessed with this. I liked the book, but the film was a mediocre attempt. I know the sequel New Moon, directed by Chris or Paul Weitz, will be better. The Plot: Bella is a teenager moving from Arizona. She moves to Forks, Washington, a dark, cold , wet place. While there, she meets Edward and his family. The Cullen family are all vampires. She is soon attracted to Edward and his dangerousness. Until she is brought to danger. Twilight is a film with many flaws. It has bad special effects, un cared about characters, and poor dialogue. I will give it some credit tough. I like Kirsten Stewart and Billy Burke. That's the only reason why I give it five stars. If I saw it again, I would think of more reasons why I like it. I also liked the last half hour of the film, because it got intense. Those are the only reason why I give it five stars. I also don't like Robert Pattinson. If Rob Pattinson and Daniel Radcliffe got in a fight, I would cheer for Daniel Radcliffe. I like Daniel Radcliffe more and he's a better actor. I'm not recommending Twilight. But if you are at a rental store and are sent to find a film and there is nothing there, then I suppose you could rent Twilight. But try to skip it if you can.