The hell are you giving this movie good votes for, people!?

Rating: 2/10 (28 June 2009)

Because it's horrible, awful, BS, pure cr@p! I just don't understand people who pay their good money for a mental "Deliverance" - treatment with this BS, and won't even admit it! Yes, people, we were screwed! Hard! Instead, they get back here and give this DOA flick 6, 7 stars, because "it wasn't boring. And because the popcorn tasted good". G-sus, people! Like a bunch of wussies against two school bullies that are Bay and Spielberg! I can not believe last year we were treated with summer movies like "Batman II" that got its bucks deservingly, and now this cr@p is NOT flopping, because "everyone says it's this summer's must-see". I didn't like the first one, but I gave this a chance. Last time they were testing the CGI, the characters, the budget. Now they were secured - and they could have spend all the time ON the characters, on the plot, on everything.
They didn't. It's blurry effects, no plot, stupid coincidences and all that cr@p that didn't work in the first part, ALL OVER AGAIN! Just with a bigger budget. In a perfect world word-of-mouth would kill these sorry-ass attempts before they make a profit.
Misters Bay & Spielberg - shame on you. Spielberg - you've lost your keen eye and have demented from the gifted child - minded revisionist into an overbloated megalomaniac who can't tell the difference between touching fantasy and childish melodrama anymore. Bay, from your days of "Bad Boys" and "Rock", you've just kept losing your magic, and now it's gone. Both of you forget directing, forget executive, stick to just producing from now on.