I can't believe I lost an EMMY'S night for this!

Rating: 1/10 (30 August 2010)

What a terrible mess this film was for me and for many people also. I mean what these producers (including Mr. Spielberg) were thinking? What Michael Bay was thinking? Too much money on their hands and the result was an excessive, endless, distractive and horrible movie? But I won't point my fingers only to these guys, I must say something to other people too. The blame of this excuse for a movie is on the shoulders of the two writers of this and Columbia Pictures/Sony for allowing a useless form of cinematic experience to been brought on screen.
Is it really that bad? YES it is! I watched this thing for the whole time which means almost three hours of projection and the movie starts to become a boring and endless experience at 15 minutes. But I went ahead, almost crying for missing the EMMY'S (although I've seen some parts of the show and I could honestly say that it was a very good show). When Linkin Park song appeared and the credits rolled I was devastated. And along with that a annoying headache appeared and bothered me for some time.
Reducing the plot: Two great team of Robots fights each other and the arena for this fight is our planet and our fate is on the hands of....Sam (Shia LaBeouf) who has in his pocket a fragment of one of these robots, and this fragment shows some secrets. Gathered with incredible and miraculous special effects there's a group of actors from the first (and excellent) film: Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, John Turturro, Kevin Dunn and Megan Fox (which is here only for the purpose of horny teenagers seeing her bending over a car; she barely has one decent dialog here). Hugo Weaving also makes the dubbing of one of the robots. And adding new elements and actors to the franchise there's a wasted performance of Rainn Wilson, Ramon Rodriguez (the movie could be better without him) and John Benjamin Hickey, who plays a hysterical bureaucrat, and has the worst performance in this film even beating Jon Voight for a similar role in the first film.
There's no plot here. I mean, two Robots hating each other and their fight is going to be here just because someone has a little thing in the pocket? Thousands of plot holes and inconsistencies; thousands of unfunny and annoying jokes; overlong battles; nothing was interesting, and when I say nothing it really means nothing. The trailers offered a dark, sinister and interesting movie to watch, but the real deal is a waste of money, waste of time, waste of actors, waste of director and waste of health (for me who end up who with a headache, perhaps other person might had some nausea).
"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" is a disaster out of salvation. One time I was the biggest defender of Michael Bay's work, even when people called the 1st "Transformers" of being the worst film ever. Everything he directed I truly enjoyed but after this one it is possible that I might not want to watch his future releases. But I know that the fault lies in the writers because nothing could be made of so great or interesting here. The loads of comedy thrown in this gigantic wreck is incredibly shocking, so shocking that you wonder if a robot wrote this movie and the writers is just names of a front like the ones used in the McCarthism.
It's incomprehensible how people liked this incomprehensible adventure and made these the 23rd highest grossing film of all time. I'm writing these because I was there, I watched, I suffered through the whole thing and as a advice coming from the one who was in the battlefield of trying to understand if this was good or not I'll say to you: If you have the guts go for it, take all the necessary risks. But don't say I didn't told you so. It is really that bad. For the indecisive people trust me, you can skip this one easily like a root canal treatment. And I've never been in one! Awful! 1/10