Better, but not stunning (no spoilers)

Rating: 6/10 (30 June 2011)

Just come out of a showing, and in summary, yes, it's a definite improvement, but is still not a fantastic movie.
The 3D was actually very good. There were some scenes where I was really impressed with the depth, and it added to the 'experience' without a doubt.
In addition to the excellent 3D, the FX artists have used far less motion blur, and the action and fights are much clearer for it.
I also felt the story was more cohesive than both 1 and 2 - and I was pleased to see we didn't have a repeat of "you need to get item X to position Y" and then rather then dropping Sam off at position Y, they leave him a mile away so he has to run through a war-zone just for the spectacle of it.
Make no mistake, there's still running, and it's still there to segue between massive set pieces, but at least there was a semblance of logic as to why the characters needed to be there.
It wasn't amazing, but it was enjoyable, and from a story perspective (as I'm not going to go so far as to call it a plot) it did seem to have the best pacing of the trilogy.
So in summary, if you enjoyed TF1, I'd say it was equally enjoyable if not slightly more so - as long as you don't expect anything more than a popcorn movie.