if after action, find another, otherwise avoid entirely.

Rating: 3/10 (19 July 2016)

Self obsessive as of a ongoing lost-within-their-mirrors absurdist minority within the already intolerable professionalists within ONLY SOME, film industries / TV production groups, specifically, the kind of military-machine obsessives that think of themselves when portraying the combinations of professionalisms and domestic managements IN COMPARISON to others' methods-of , try to create but continue to only embarrass themselves in the process of trying, a COMBINATION of command and professionalism, that has been so over used that just about any possibly-professional role of a character on screen, can be somehow styled-up to somewhat correspond to this or be portrayed as in the shadow of and then by inference, dependent on it, or be "less" able to be AS professional, without it - a mere shoe-saleswoman, struts with unquestionable confidence along her own catwalk of self-purposefullnesses Bluueeerrrrgh!!
However, Unfortunately for her , just about everybody else, not wishing to somehow set standards for HOW to demonstrate, just generally... doesn't give a sh##.
WHY, oh why... always in agreement with each other (heh heh) USA military-machine slamming-door producers ... do you try futiley, to maintain your door-slamming Shockwave-tech audio BS ... when by comparison, YOU, are in the shadow, of Monty Python, in fact.
It is embarrassing and tedious in the extreme, for not only the true cinema appreciators , but even both yourselves, as well as your own children.
Not saying you thought it stunk , does not mean you did not think it did.
EXTRACT yourselves from yourselves , and take a step back and have a look at how obsessed with yourselves you have become.
Getting back to the film , I literally could not watch more than about 10-25 seconds at a time , this movie when it was on TV, primarily because of the utterly appalling/non existent INTRODUCTION, to the early story / setting.
There was more intro, in the opening credits, than in the following 20 minutes of relationship-role priming and consumerist-brainwashing.
Revolting and not truly-self-aware ... more like aware of what their CHOSEN 'selfness'es, would be, able to be OF, in one's then own awareness, of one's chosen identity.
Anyone worth their bread in developmental psych however, knows that such choices depend on imitation ... and although much naturally developed identity has functional observation which INCLUDES normal imitation INAMONGST observation, by comparison, ARBRITRARY choice of would be identity, as perceived in movies like this, is what leads ppl to the state of fragility, they end up in, when not as naturally developed as they would otherwise be.
Do not mistake the apparent toughness of the identity, as being of things exactly opposite of fragility - subsequent defence mechanisms, that come out as demonstrative in defiance, of then portrayed as undermining identity EXTERNAL to perceived as internal sources of this identity, whilst perhaps sometimes truly external, are not external when one's own is somehow isolated and protected, ONLY needing, some vague sense of internal - all things in our current experience DEPEND on the external somewhere along the line.
VAIN of its 'self' knowing audience, but then also, the producers themselves are to be only non-military-professionalist ... this movie should be well and truly thrown in the kept-some-symphony-orchestra-musicians-in-a-job-but-otherwise-crap bin, and hopefully, forgotten about entirely.
Difficult to follow, and needing referral to other content, to be watched.
Wastes massive amounts of time on personal face-to-face exchanges, even if plot-fleshing out, isn't your thing.