Surely it is not a movie that deserves to be in the Top 250 list

Rating: 1/10 (11 July 2007)

A movie that relies on CGI and attempts to cover all its deficiencies (weak plot, awful dialogs and bad acting) through computer generated animations surely does not deserve to be in the top 250. The first part of the movie was 'ok', which could barely deserve a 7, however the second part was no better than a Walt Disney movie based on the friendship of benevolent giant robots and kids. The tense atmosphere of the first part was gone and something not better than a well-designed video game demo came through. How can people be so generous in their votes is another question. However, it can be explained by "kids voting kids' movies". 6 is my vote, which is more than it deserves...