great western, visual eye candy

Rating: 8/10 (1 February 2009)

Seen both versions with both Costner & Russell. Must say I prefer this one.
As a previous IMDb reviewer stated ("Kilmer & Russell together in the same picture is a treat for the ladies.") I'd have to agree, not only visually appealing, but also very talented actors.
With that being said, this is a great ensemble cast. Russell, Kilmer, Eliott, Paxton. They work well together and make their respective characters in history come to life. Also keep your eyes peeled for cameos by Billy Zane, and a chubby Billy Bob Thorton.
It's a simple story and it works. While others scream about any historical inaccuracies, Costner was better, etc. The fact remains that Costner's version was BORING. If your idea of seeing a movie is to be entertained, than Tombstone delivers.
I just want to take a minute and reflect of Kilmer's performance, Definitely a highlight of the film. Kilmer is a talented actor, and I like him, his portrayal of Doc Holliday is nothing short of captivating. You're mesmerized by him when he's on screen as he steals every scene he's in. The real Doc Holliday was an educated man from Georgia (a trained dentist). Kilmer puts a touch of this elegance in his performance which I liked. But on the flip-side, plays him as fearless, as the real Holliday (dying from TB) was. Ironically true that he died in a bed with his boots off rather than in a hail of bullets or in s gambling dispute.
Elliott is a wise casting choice, Western's are his forte, and he brings a polished performance. Russell is great as Earp, not to mention handsome. Paxton, I could take or leave. The locations and sets are good, and the movie doesn't keep you bored for a minute. A great and entertaining flick!