The name says it all

Rating: 1/10 (3 May 1999)

Anyone that says this "movie" is of any use to human existence is a consumer who has been brainwashed into conformity and an ethic of non-resistance and docility. When James Cameron self-proclaimed himself as the king of cinema, he effectively tied the noose around his neck. When people look upon this movie in ten years or so, they will realize with shame and embarrassment what complete fools the general public were to ever think this movie was anything besides big money.
Some of the numerous bad points about this movie are as follows: special effects - made me think I was watching a computer game, therefore, not good (for a movie); acting - laughable, DiCaprio shows what a whining brat he can be; script - melodrama over a subject hardly reinvented, love between the lowly squire and rich princess?; directing - nothing extraordinary, actually, nothing UNordinary.
But I suppose the masses have the final say with their wallets. I just hope we aren't fooling ourselves to ever think to immortalize Cameron's titanic waste with the likes of the epic "Citizen Kane." There is a difference between a "movie" that sells and a "film" that inspires.