3D not very good in spots

Rating: 6/10 (27 April 2012)

Much of the 3D conversion in the earlier part of the film looked phony and actually detracted from the story. The images looked like multiple 2D layers pasted at different distances and each layer looked flat and lacked depth, making for an incongruous and distracting image, unlike a film shot with a twin lens camera to begin with.
Later scenes, shot at greater distances where the 3D effect was more subtle, were more effective and sometimes quite stunning.
(Note, review policy demands that I have at least ten lines of text. I didn't want to repeat any of the previous comments about this movie, there are over 2000 messages, good and bad, about the story. All I needed to say was in the first eight lines. Anyway, IMDb now you have your ten lines.)