The God of... THUNDER

Rating: 8/10 (22 May 2011)

*** out of (****)
After the critical and financial success of 2008's iconic "Iron Man" and its inevitable follow-up in 2009, I knew I could count on Marvel to bring us full circle with "Thor", another line up with their summer blockbusters. Adding Portman and Hopkins to the mix certainly didn't hurt one bit. However, the post-converted 3D detracted from some of my hopes. Fortunately, "Thor" is a strong summer opener, and hopefully more blockbusters pave the way. It goes to show that you don't have to make another sequel or re-boot to ensure greatness. A solid comic adaptation with something new brought to the table is just as sufficient.
"Thor" revolves around the namesake protagonist (Hemsworth) who is the God of Thunder, who waves his hammer around with great pride. However, Thor's father thinks he is morally irresponsible for such actions, and thinks his son takes pride in the gratuity of his works, not for the overall message. So, he confiscates his son's artillery choice until Thor is fully capable and understanding of his actions.
First of all, the script just works. The dialogue is well-written, the characters are developed to an extent, and the overall premise is an efficient one. I personally think the six writers knew what they were doing. Furthermore, the leads are pretty likable and charismatic in their own ways. Portman is just a pleasure to the eye, but every scene she's in, she makes it worthwhile. Hemsworth obviously portrays a great and aspiring character. Dennings, while not extraordinary, does her job and makes the audience laugh here and there.
Also, the action in this movie is just killer. It's very well choreographed, and the special effects are stunning. However, there were a few problems I had with this movie. For one, the film takes a while to get going. The first act starts out very cliché-ridden and reminded me heavily of "Clash of the Titans", except less cheesier. And also, I know this has been mentioned before, but if your 3D is converted or serves no purpose to the story, don't use it. Period. It almost makes the film suffer, and just really agitates the viewer for squeezing out a few more dollars.
All in all, "Thor" lives up to its hype. With charismatic performances and a well-written story, this film worked. Not to mention the action doesn't disappoint, and doesn't detract from the film. If you're going to see "Thor", which I wholeheartedly recommend, please skip the 3D viewing. It is completely useless and serves absolutely no purpose hence being post- converted. I think maybe the only time post-conversion 3D has worked is with "The Green Hornet", and even then, it wasn't anything of brilliance.