Thumbs up for the movie, thumbs down for Radcliffe

Rating: 7/10 (8 February 2012)

I went to see this film for two reasons. First, because I like old-fashioned ghost stories. Second, I was curious how I would like Daniel Radcliffe outside of his Harry Potter role.
In terms of being an old-fashioned ghost story, mission accomplished! And, this has some real chills in it. Not to mention a surprise ending that almost stunned me.
Now, in regard to Daniel Radcliffe, I have to admit to begin with that about half way through the Harry Potter films, I came to the conclusion that Rupert Grint and Emma Watson were far better actors than Radcliffe, and that in the long run, they were probably most likely to have long-lasting careers. Of course, we won't know that for a while yet. But in terms of his acting in this film, I was not particularly impressed with Radcliffe. Part of that may not be his fault. There are very, very long segments of this film with absolutely no dialog...perhaps as much silent time as in any film I have ever seen. Of course, my negativity only increased since I went to this film just a day or two after Radcliffe admitted being drunk in some scenes in the Harry Potter series, and that's not a trait of acting I respect...particularly in a children's film. The next Radcliffe film to come along -- well, I may go IF the film itself appeals to me, but not to see Radcliffe. Oh, and BTW, trim those eyebrows!!!!! In terms of the supporting cast, Ciarán Hinds deserves the most credit. Really a very nice performance.
A good film with a so-so starring actor. Okay to watch, once, but it won't find its way to my DVD shelf.