If Radcliffe is a good actor, I should receive an Oscar!

Rating: 3/10 (27 October 2014)

I didn't see Harry Potter, but I know of course that those movies are very popular. I just don't understand how Radcliffe can be considered an "actor". Maybe some actors are good only when they are children? Because here, in this movie, he is stiff as a board and probably the most wooden "actor" I have ever seen! What made it even worse: many veeeeery long shots showing his wooden face. I don't know the film industry, how it works, so it's beyond me how a terrible actor like him (with only one facial expression) can be invited to play the main character in a movie, especially in a horror movie, which requires the actor to be really terrified.
Add to this that the movie is not really scary, the slow pace and the simple story.
Watchable? Yes, if you have nothing better to watch. Good? No.