the usual mediocrity

Rating: 1/10 (16 April 2005)

As usual the director has made another mediocre film. It's basically a student film far too long. The story could have been told in less than an hour episode and it could have been as well as a TV film. Such a waste of actors but I guess they have to pay their bills as well. Dialogues were at time even irritating for how they were obvious and bad. Cinematic ally speaking the film had nice images, not special though but that's the job of a cinematographer who is another person employed for the film. This director strangely enough writes and direct overrated movies, still manages movie after movie. For one thing is very skilled of is finding financiers and producers because anyone else coming out with those "thin" scripts with one plot would be impossible to sell even the ideas. I believe at film school they might teach story constructions and all but perhaps he didn't even go to a film school. He was already a genius, check out his homemade film he is so proud to show in each DVD. It's insulting the intelligence of the audience. I wish only that the reviewer would write honest article when his movies are released but because of what probably the distribution companies pay to the magazine by the time the film is going into the theaters all reviews are great (even though many magazine don't even get a screening copy or preview, weird isn't it?!) but months after that the same film magazines publish other reviews and usually those are more "realistic", in fact the latest I read finally told the truth, this movie sucks!!!