M. Night fails yet again.

Rating: 1/10 (2 August 2004)

I shouldn't be able to figure out the "twist" of the film in the first eight minutes, then spend the next two hours bored by shoddy filmmaking. No one at the theater I saw this at seemed even remotely surprised by the big ending.
The same was true of Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, and Signs. The man is a hack. And what's with the self-important director cameos anyway? Does this man actually think he's Hitchcock?
M. Night claims that he's discovered the formula for a blockbuster success. That may be true. But when was the last time a big blockbuster was actually any good?
0 for 4 and I'm done seeing this man's movies.