'Eclipse'? More like Boring.

Rating: 2/10 (2 July 2010)

First, let me clarify: I hate Twilight. I could give you a million reasons why I hate the books and the movies, but I won't. I only went to the movie a) to see if it would be any good, and b) to poke fun at it. Even after I started hating the series, Eclipse was still my favorite. So, of course, I thought that maybe the movie wouldn't be too bad. But was I wrong.
I mean, even from an unbiased point of view, it still stands that the movie was just downright boring. I felt myself wishing for scenes where no one was talking. The script was, in my opinion, poorly written and very predictable, just like in the two previous movies. The characters were flat and the acting horrible. I'm starting to wonder if the actors are being bad on purpose. The ending felt as if they were just brushing it all away, like, "Well, that was our little adventure. Let's go back to our normal lives and forget all this, shall we?" There was no big cliffhanger ending, no sudden, gripping desire for me to see Breaking Dawn. In short, it was a complete and utter waste of two hours.
On a last, more positive note, the movie did have a few redeeming points. The action scenes were great (especially the first one with Victoria) and well-executed. I also liked Charlie and Bella's 'talk'; it was nice to see Kristen Stewart actually showing some emotion for once. But one of the top moments was when Riley and his little army were emerging from the water (I was practically squealing at the epicness). Also, the movie seemed well directed.
But overall, it was boring, it was predictable, and by the end of it, I wanted my money back. Twilight fan or not, you probably won't like it.