Actually pretty good!

Rating: 10/10 (2 July 2010)

So the first Twilight movie received like a 6 rating on IMDb. New Moon received like a 4 something and I do not understand how Eclipse can get a 3!!! If anything at all, I think that the ratings were in backwards order. Now Twilight was not horrible horrible but there were many many things wrongs with it. The acting was just okay, the cinematography was amateurish, and the special effects were unimaginably horrible. I've seen Youtube videos that have better special effects. The soundtrack/score were pretty good though. New Moon was a tremendous step up from Twilight, especially in acting (except Rob Pattinson) and extremely in the special effects. Yet somehow, it received a lower rating. Eclipse was even better. The acting was a major improvement for almost all the characters, but especially Rob, Kristen, and the Jasper guy (forgot his real name). Taylor Lautner seemed a little lacking but he did okay. The previews had me worried that this sequel was going to be really really cheesy but it actually kept the cheese factor down to a low. There were certain parts in Twilight in New Moon that actually made me cringe with the acting and cheesiness. The screenwriter (Melissa Rosenburg or something like that) actually did a pretty decent job with this one. I wanted to smack after seeing Twilight and New Moon but she did pretty good with this one. The Eclipse book actually bored me a little through the middle but the movie did a good job of not boring us too much. So overall, this movie was a lot better than the previous two which is why I do not understand why it's receiving such harsh reviews. If you're a fan of the books than you'll love seeing this movie, but if your not, than just stay away because us fans aren't really going to care much about your criticism anyway. And hey! If it's such a bad movie....than why does it top the box office charts every time it comes out?!?!?